Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2024 Sep 13;39(3):ME24027. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME24027

Isolation of a Moderately Acidophilic Nitrobacter from a Nitrifying Community Supplied with Urea

Yuta Endo 1,†, Hirotsugu Fujitani 1,†,*, Ayano Kaneko 1, Takuya Ninomiya 1, Chiharu Umezawa 1, Megumi Kuroiwa 1,‡, Yuichi Suwa 1
PMCID: PMC11427310  PMID: 39284717

Abstract

Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB), which perform the second step of aerobic nitrification, play an important role in soil. In the present study, we report a novel isolate from agricultural soil affiliated with the genus Nitrobacter and its physiological characteristics. We sampled the surface soil of a vegetable field and obtained mixed culture A31 using the most probable number (MPN) method with inorganic medium containing 0.75‍ ‍mM urea (pH 5.5). The dilution–extinction procedure on culture A31 led to the isolation of a strain that was designated as Nitrobacter sp. A67. The nxrB1 gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 (302 bp) was classified into Cluster 5, and the highest sequence identity was 96.10% with Nitrobacter sp. BS5/19. The NO2– oxidation activity of Nitrobacter sp. A67 was investigated at various pH. The optimum pH for NO2– oxidation was 5.8–6.4. This result indicates that Nitrobacter sp. A67 is a moderately acidophilic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium.

Keywords: acidic pH, isolation, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, soil, urea

Nitrification, the biological oxidation of ammonia (NH3) to nitrate (NO3–) in the global nitrogen cycle, is regarded as a major pathway for supplying NO3–, a rate-limiting nutrient source for primary production in soil and aquatic ecosystems. The nitrification process often results in environmental issues, such as the eutrophication of aquatic systems due to NO3– outflow, greenhouse gas (mainly N2O) emission, and nitrogen loss from agricultural soils (Robertson et al., 2013; Norton and Ouyang, 2019; Prosser et al., 2020). Nitrification typically consists of two steps: the oxidation of NH3 to nitrite (NO2–) by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), collectively designated as ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM), and the consecutive oxidation of NO2– to NO3– by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB). Therefore, NO2– rarely accumulates in the environment. Nitrospira that mediate the complete ammonia oxidation (comammox) of NH3 to NO3– have recently been discovered (Daims et al., 2015; van Kessel et al., 2015).

In the soil NOB community, the importance of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira as two NOB genera that are more abundant and sensitive to agricultural management has been recognized (Han et al., 2018). In paddy field soil, the abundance of Nitrobacter-like NOB increased in response to nitrogen levels, whereas Nitrospira-like NOB predominated in nutrient-limited surface soil (Ke et al., 2013). Potential nitrite oxidation (PNO) in tilled/no-tillage agricultural soils with high nitrogen availability positively correlated with the abundance of Nitrobacter, but negatively correlated with that of Nitrospira-like NOB (Attard et al., 2010). Long-term fertilization in acidic forest soil increased the abundance of Nitrobacter-like NOB, but did not markedly affect that of Nitrospira-like NOB (Wertz et al., 2012). In acidic agricultural soils (pH 4.92) fertilized with urea, the abundance of Nitrospira-like NOB exceeded that of Nitrobacter-like NOB (Wang et al., 2014a). As described above, N availability markedly affected the abundance of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira and pH also had an impact on NOB.

Ni et al. (2023) recently reviewed nitrification in acidic and alkaline environments. Soil pH has been regarded as an important factor affecting the activity, population, and diversity of nitrifying microorganisms in the environment (Li et al., 2019). The abundance of AOM in acidic environments and the physiology of AOM isolates from acidic agricultural soils have been extensively exami­ned (e.g. Nicol et al., 2008; Lehtovirta-Morley et al., 2011; Lehtovirta-Morley et al., 2014; Hayatsu et al., 2017). Previous studies reported the abundance of NOB at the genus level in acidic soil (e.g. Wertz et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014a) and comammox Nitrospira was enriched in acidic soil from a tea field (Takahashi et al., 2020). However, to the best of our knowledge, only three strains of the genus Nitrobacter, Nitrobacter sp. Io acid, Nitrobacter winogradskyi, and Nitrobacter sp. strain NHB1, were shown to be capable of oxidizing nitrite at acidic pH in cultures (Bock and Heinrich, 1969; Hankinson and Schmidt, 1988; De Boer et al., 1991). Therefore, the isolation of novel NOB with ecologically relevant characteristics remains an important challenge.

The majority of previous NOB isolates were obtained from cultures containing NO2– as the sole nitrogen and energy source for NOB (e.g., Watson et al., 1986; Hankinson and Schmidt, 1988; Sorokin et al., 1998; Spieck et al., 2014). In some cases, NH3 was used as the sole nitrogen and energy source in co-cultures with AOM (Watson and Waterbury, 1971; Sorokin et al., 2014; Fujitani et al., 2020). As shown in Fig. S1, in acidic pH, free ammonia, NH3 (FA) decreased (NH4++OH–⇌NH3+H2O), whereas free nitrous acid, HNO2 (FNA) increased (H++NO2–⇌HNO2) due to chemical equilibria (Anthonisen et al., 1976). HNO2 and a high concentration of NH3 were previously reported to inhibit NOB and AOB (Kim et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2014b; Zhang et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2021). When urea is supplied to a nitrification community, it is decomposed into NH3 either/both by heterotrophic bacteria and/or urease-positive nitrifiers, and NH3 may then be intracellularly oxidized to NO2– by AOM. The NO2– produced may be consecutively oxidized to NO3– by NOB. Therefore, the potential inhibitory effects of free NH3 and HNO2 on NOB may be suppressed, and acidic NOB may then be more easily isolated.

We herein report the isolation of a novel Nitrobacter strain in agricultural soil that accommodates a moderately acidic pH. The aims of the present study were as follows: i) to obtain a nitrifying community in which complete nitrification progresses to NO3– with urea, and ii) to isolate acidophilic Nitrobacter from the nitrifying community by dilution-extinction with NO2– as the sole nitrogen and energy source.

Materials and Methods

Soil sample

Soil was sampled on October 2, 2017 from an open field for cultivating vegetables, such as onions, carrots, and sweet corn, which was supplied for more than 20 years with organic compost made mainly from cow dung and residues at Tsukuba, Ibaraki. Five kilograms of soil was obtained at a depth of 10‍ ‍cm from the field surface, placed in a cooler box with ice, and transferred to the laboratory. Soil subsamples were placed in plastic bags or glass containers with screw caps and stored at 4°C until used. Soil pH was measured using the H-SERIES H160 pH meter (HACH). Measurements were performed with a water/soil (v/w) ratio of 2.5. The pH of soil samples was 7.2 (Table S1). Other soil chemical properties are shown in Supplementary materials (Table S1)

Media

In the present study, we used a medium modified from the previously described basal medium C (Suwa et al., 1994) by adding 220‍ ‍mg L–1 NaHCO3 as a carbon source due to the reduced CO2 supply under acidic conditions and by lowering the amount of the trace element mixture in ATCC medium #1573 from 1.0 to 0.6‍ ‍mL L–1. ULAC medium (pH 5.5), containing 0.75‍ ‍mmol L–1 urea in modified basal medium C, and UL medium (pH 7.6) were used for most probable number (MPN) enumeration. ULAC medium was used for the subculture of culture A31. NUAC medium (pH 5.5), containing 100‍ ‍μmol L–1 NaNO2 in modified basal medium C as the sole source of nitrogen and energy for NOB, was used to isolate NOB (pH 5.5). Detailed information is provided in Supplementary materials.

In physiological studies on Nitrobacter sp. A67, the isolate designated in the present study, modified basal medium C containing 0.75‍ ‍mmol L–1 NaNO2 was dispensed into eight bottles and citric acid and Na2HPO4 were added as the buffer of this medium. pH was adjusted to 3.7, 4.2, 4.7, 5.3, 5.8, 6.4, 6.8, and 7.3 based on the concentration ratio of citric acid and Na2HPO4. Media were sterilized by filtration using a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.2‍ ‍μm. To select the optimum temperature, sterile NUAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 0.75‍ ‍mmol L–1 NaNO2 was used.

MPN enumeration

One gram of the soil sample was fully suspended in 9‍ ‍mL of sterile ULAC medium. The soil suspension (3‍ ‍mL, 10-fold diluted suspension) was transferred to 27‍ ‍mL sterile ULAC medium (102-fold diluted suspension) and was thoroughly resuspended. This procedure was repeated to prepare a 103- to 106-fold diluted suspension. Subsequently, 0.5-mL aliquots of each dilution (102- to 106-fold) were transferred to small test tubes containing 4.5‍ ‍mL of sterile ULAC medium in five replicates for MPN enumeration. The same method was performed with UL medium for MPN enumeration. After an incubation at 25°C for 42 days, NO2– and NO3– concentrations were measured using the colorimetric method (Miranda et al., 2001). Cultures were regarded as ‘AOM-positive’ and ‘AOM+NOB-positive’ when NO2– and NO3– concentrations, respectively, were higher than 10‍ ‍μM.

Isolation of NOB

The NOB pure culture candidate (A67) was isolated from mixed culture A31 via a dilution-extinction procedure employing NUAC medium. An aliquot of fresh medium from culture A31 was diluted 108-fold with sterile NUAC medium containing 100‍ ‍μmol L–1 NaNO2 as the sole source of nitrogen and energy for NOB, and 0.3-mL aliquots were transferred to 400 small test tubes containing 2.7‍ ‍mL of sterile NUAC medium, which made a 109-fold dilution of the culture. After an incubation at 25°C for 25 days, NO3– concentrations were measured using the colorimetric method, and NO3– positivity was assessed by the naked eye. The flow of procedures to isolate NOB is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Flow chart of this study.

Physiological characterization of the isolate

To select the optimum pH for NO2– oxidation, Nitrobacter sp. A67 was incubated at various pH (3.7, 4.2, 4.7, 5.3, 5.8, 6.4, 6.8, 7.3) at 25°C for 17 days. Nitrobacter sp. A67 was precultured without stirring in 135‍ ‍mL of modified NUAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 0.75‍ ‍mmol L–1 NaNO2 in a 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask at 25°C at 10% (v/v). Sterile NaNO2 solution was added to the fed-batch. When the culture consumed 1.5‍ ‍mM NO2–, 5‍ ‍mL of the preculture were transferred to freshly prepared medium consisting of 45‍ ‍mL of sterile modified basal medium C with various pH values and 0.75‍ ‍mM NaNO2 in 100-mL Erlenmeyer flasks. NO2– and NO3– concentrations and pH were assessed throughout the incubation period. Experiments were performed in duplicate. To select the optimum temperature for NO2– oxidation, Nitrobacter sp. A67 was incubated at various temperatures (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, and 42°C) for 16 days using the same method as the pH test. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Chemical ana­lysis

Nitrite and nitrate concentrations were measured by a colorimetric method using the Enspire Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer). Nitrite concentrations were quantified by coloring with Griess reagent (Miranda et al., 2001) and measuring absorbance at‍ ‍538‍ ‍nm. Nitrate concentrations were assessed as nitrite after reducing nitrate with vanadium (III) solution (Miranda et al., 2001).

Purification check

Strain A67 was proven to be pure by (1) an examination of 94 16S rRNA gene clones using the primer set 27f/1492r (Table S2), and (2) microscopic observations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a genus-specific probe (Table S3) and (3) 4 media commonly used to cultivate heterotrophs. Detailed information is provided in Supplementary material.

PCR and sequencing ana­lysis

A microbial community ana­lysis of culture A31 (isolation source of strain A67), which was maintained for 1 year by subculturing on ULAC medium (pH 5.5), was performed using a next-generation sequencing amplicon ana­lysis targeting the 16S rRNA gene (TechnoSuruga Laboratory). Briefly, DNA was extracted from culture A31 using ISOIL for the Beads Beating kit (Nippon Gene). Extracted DNA was amplified by PCR with a primer set targeting the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplicon was sequenced using MiSeq (Illumina) and MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina). The sequence was analyzed using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) and DB-BA 13.0 (TechnoSuruga Laboratory). Sequences with homology of 97% or higher were compiled as operational taxonomic units (OTUs).

In the PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain A67, the primer set 27f/1492r (Table S1) was used with TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa Bio) according to the following thermal protocol: at 94°C for 30 s; 35 cycles at 98°C for 10‍ ‍s, 56°C for 30‍ ‍s, and 72°C for 90 s; and at 72°C for 5‍ ‍min. In the PCR amplification of the nxrB1 gene sequences of strain A67, the primer set nxrB-1F/1R (Table S1) was used with the following thermal protocol: at 95°C for 10‍ ‍min; 35 cycles at 98°C for 10‍ ‍s, 55°C for 90‍ ‍s, and 72°C for 1‍ ‍min; and at 72°C for 12‍ ‍min. The nearly full lengths of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences (1,326‍ ‍bp) and nxrB1 gene sequences (302 bp) were sequenced by Fasmac.

Phylogenetic ana­lysis

A phylogenetic ana­lysis of strain A67 based on the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and nxrB1 gene was conducted. Evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method. The Jukes-Cantor model (Jukes and Cantor, 1969) was used for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences and the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) for nxrB1 gene sequences. Evolutionary ana­lyses were conducted using MEGA X software (Kumar et al., 2018).

Data availability

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 was deposited at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession number LC702421. The nxrB gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 was deposited at DDBJ under the accession number LC702422.

Results and Discussion

A source culture to isolate novel NOB from agricultural soil

The experimental procedure for a community ana­lysis of an isolation source and the isolation of novel NOB is shown in a flow chart (Fig. 1). AOM and NOB in agricultural soil were enumerated using two media containing urea: ULAC medium (pH 5.5) and UL medium (pH 7.6) (Table 1). NO3– was detected in all 12 nitrification-positive tubes for a MPN-enumerating nitrifying population using ULAC medium (pH 5.5), indicating AOM+NOB (and/or comammox) positivity. Among 20 nitrification-positive tubes when UL medium (pH 7.6) was used for MPN enumeration, NO3– was detected in one out of 20 nitrification-positive tubes, indicating AOM+NOB (and/or comammox) positivity. In the remaining 19 tubes, NO3– was absent, whereas NO2– was detected, indicating AOM positivity and NOB negativity. Comparisons of the MPN estimates of AOM using two media revealed 61-fold higher estimates (1.7×105 [g wet soil]–1) in UL medium (pH 7.6), the pH of which was markedly closer to that measured with the soil sample used (pH 7.2). Regarding the MPN score of NOB, ULAC medium (pH 5.5) recovered 140-fold more (2.8×103 [g wet soil]–1) than UL medium (pH 7.6). However, medium pH during cultivation was not monitored. This result suggests that NOB in the soil sample adapted to acidification in their microhabitat. If this is the case and if medium corresponding to the bulk pH of soil was used, ‘acidophilic and/or acid-tolerant’ NOB may have been overlooked. Therefore, NOB isolated from enrichment cultures with conventional methods may not necessarily reflect the ecology of NOB. The NOB isolation strategy used in the present study (Fig. 1) overcame these essential issues in microbial ecology and related ecophysiology. One of the 12 AOM+NOB-positive cultures in ULAC medium was designated as culture A31. The nitrification activity of culture A31 was maintained even after being subcultured for 1 year. Therefore, culture A31 was used as an isolation source for NOB that adapt to an acidic environment.

Table 1.

MPN enumeration of NO2– and NO3– production after a 42-day incubation of an agricultural soil sample on ULAC medium (pH 5.5) and UL medium (pH 7.6) amended with 0.75‍ ‍mM urea.

dilution MPN score on1)
ULAC medium UL medium
10–2 + + + + + * * + * *
10–3 +2) – + + + * * * * *
10–4 – – + + + * * * * *
10–5 – – – – – * – * * *
10–6 – – – – – – – – – *
MPN3) of AOM
(ratio)		 2.8×103
(1)		 1.7×105
(61)
MPN of NOB
(ratio)		 2.8×103
(140)		 0.02×103
(1)
Open in a new tab

1) “+”, NO3– was detected (≥10‍ ‍μM); “*” NO2– was detected (≥10‍ ‍μM).

2) This culture was selected as the isolation source of NOB and designated as culture A31.

3) MPN (g wet soil)–1.

The nitrification process from urea to NO3– in culture A31 was observed by measuring NO2– and NO3– concentrations (Fig. 2). The accumulation of NO2– was not observed. In community ana­lyses of culture A31 based on the 16S rRNA gene, the ratios of the sequences affiliated with the genus Nitrososphaera (AOA) and the genus Nitrobacter (NOB) were 20.58 and 0.12%, respectively. Sequences related to comammox Nitrospira were not detected.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Nitrification activity and microbial community ana­lysis of culture A31 (isolation source of strain A67). NO2– (closed circle) and NO3– (open circle) in culture A31 by subculturing on ULAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 0.75‍ ‍mM urea. NO2– was not detected during the incubation, and complete nitrification from urea to NO3– was observed. The experiment was conducted without replication. However, re-experiments provided similar results (data not shown).

Some AOA in acidic soils are ureolytic and may generate NH3 directly from urea (Lu and Jia, 2013). The adaptive growth of Nitrososphaera-like AOA (1.1b group) in acidic soil has also been reported (Wang et al., 2014a). In sequences related to the genus Nitrososphaera in culture A31, the closest strain was Nitrososphaera viennensis EN76 isolated from garden soil (CP007536). A previous study found an urease gene cluster in the genome of strain EN76 and suggested that this archaeon used urea as a sole energy source instead of ammonia (Tourna et al., 2011). The acidic nitrification process in the A31 culture may be maintained through the oxidation of NH3 to NO2– by Nitrososphaera (AOA) and the oxidation of NO2– to NO3– by Nitrobacter (NOB). Since the concentration of NO2– produced was very low (Fig. 2), the concentration of free nitrite may have been below the inhibitory value of NOB based on chemical equilibria at acidic pH (Fig. S1).

Additionally, ammonia as a sole energy source was used to enrich comammox and NOB Nitrospira in a previous study (Takahashi et al., 2020). In the present study, urea instead of ammonia was supplied to enrich AOA and NOB. Although the abundance of AOA and comammox Nitrospira in the sampling site in the present study remains unknown, a difference in ammonia or urea availability under acidic conditions may contribute to the selective enrichment of AOA and comammox Nitrospira.

Isolation and phylogenetic ana­lysis of NOB

The dilution-extinction procedure was applied to culture A31 for the isolation of NOB. NUAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 100‍ ‍μmol L–1 NaNO2 was used. After an incubation for 25 days, 2 out of 400 cultures were positive for NO3– (i.e., positive for NOB), and an aliquot of one of the two, designated as culture A67, was transferred (10% [v/v]) to 13.5‍ ‍mL of freshly prepared NUAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 100‍ ‍μmol L–1 NaNO2. After subculturing A67 (10% [v/v]) for 2 years on 90‍ ‍mL NUAC medium (pH 5.5) containing 0.3‍ ‍mmol L–1 NaNO2 in a 200-mL Erlenmeyer flask, a purity check of culture A67 was conducted by investigating (1) whether the sequences of 16S rRNA gene clones were identical, (2) the consistency of cells stained for FISH, and (3) the growth of heterotrophs. Candidate culture A67 was a pure culture because (1) all 94 clones of the 16S rRNA gene sequences formed a single OTU with a sequence identity of 98.7% or higher, (2) all bacterial cells stained with the EUB338 probe and targeted cells stained with the Nbac-154 probe were consistent (Fig. S2), and (3) there was no growth of heterotrophs. Collectively, these results confirmed that we obtained a pure culture of NOB designated as strain A67.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 (1,326 bp) was classified into cluster 5, as defined by Vanparys et al. (2007) (Fig. 3A), and sequence identity was‍ ‍99.92% with Nitrobacter sp. BS5/19, 99.77% with Nitrobacter sp. 263, and 99.70% with Nitrobacter sp. 219. Sequence identity with the type strains was 99.39% with N. winogradskyi Nb-255, 99.32% with Nitrobacter alkalicus AN1, 99.39% with Nitrobacter vulgaris DSM10236, and 98.94% with Nitrobacter hamburgensis X14.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

(A) Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of the genus Nitrobacter. Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris DSM123T was inserted as an outgroup. The tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method. Bootstrap values at the branch nodes were iterated 1,000 times. The strain obtained in the present study is shown in bold. The scale bar corresponds to 0.5% estimated sequence divergence. Accession numbers are shown to the right of the organism names in brackets. Cluster numbers from 1 to 5 are shown based on a previous study (Vanparys et al., 2007). (B) Phylogenetic tree based on the nxrB1 gene sequences of the genus Nitrobacter. A Nitrococcus mobilis Nb-231T nxrB homologue was used as an outgroup. The tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method. Bootstrap values at the branch nodes were iterated 1,000 times. The strain obtained in the present study is shown in bold. The scale bar corresponds to 5% estimated sequence divergence. Accession numbers are shown to the right of the organism names in brackets. Cluster numbers from 1 to 5 are shown based on a previous study (Vanparys et al., 2007).

The nxrB1 gene sequences of Nitrobacter sp. A67 (302‍ ‍bp) were also classified into cluster 5, as defined by Vanparys et al. (2007) (Fig. 3B), and sequence identity was 96.10% with Nitrobacter sp. BS5/19 and 94.98% with Nitrobacter sp. 219. Sequence identity with the type strains was 92.36% with N. winogradskyi Nb-255, 93.82% with N. vulgaris DSM10236, and 91.44% with N. hamburgensis X14.

Vanparys et al. (2007) summarized that strains 263, BS5/19, and 219 were distantly related to the strains of all currently known Nitrobacter species and, thus, may belong to another species. Since Nitrobacter sp. A67 was classified into cluster 5 and the nxrB1 gene had low sequence identity with the previously isolated strains, Nitrobacter sp. A67 may be a novel species; however, genome sequencing in a future study may clarify whether strain A67 is a new species of Nitrobacter.

Physiology of Nitrobacter sp. A67

NO2– consumption and NO3– production by Nitrobacter sp. A67 from pH 3.7 to 7.3 was monitored for 17 days. The chemical destruction of NO2– at pH 3.7 and 4.2 was observed in negative control (non-inoculated) experiments; however, NO2– was stable at other pH. The optimum pH for NO2– oxidation by strain A67 was 5.8–6.4, while NO2– oxidation at pH 4.7 was not observed (Fig. 4). A previous study reported that the NO2– oxidation rate of Nitrobacter sp. Io acid was optimum at pH 5.5 and declined with decreases in pH (Hankinson and Schmidt, 1988). This finding suggests that Nitrobacter sp. A67 and Nitrobacter sp. Io acid are moderately acidophilic NOB. Cluster classification in the genus Nitrobacter was based on the 16S rRNA and nxrB1 genes (Fig. 3). Phylogenetically, Nitrobacter sp. Io Acid and strain A67 were classified as clusters 4 and 5, respectively. The acidophilic or acid-tolerant properties of the genus Nitrobacter may depend on strains. It currently remains unknown whether Nitrobacter strains adapting to acidic conditions concentrate in specific clusters within the phylogeny.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

NO2– oxidation rate of Nitrobacter sp. A67 at various pH. (A) Nitrite consumption, (B) nitrate production. Data show average values obtained in duplicate.

Regarding temperature, Nitrobacter sp. A67 showed high nitrite consumption rates from 25°C to 37°C. The optimum temperature for nitrite consumption by strain A67 was 30°C, whereas nitrite consumption at 10°C was not observed (Fig. 5). Additionally, Nitrobacter sp. A67 did not exhibit urea degradation activity (data not shown). To the best of our knowledge, urea degradation by Nitrobacter strains has yet to be reported.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Optimum temperature of Nitrobacter sp. A67. The maximum NO2– oxidation rate was defined as the average value of the three cultures. Error bars show standard deviations (n=3).

Ecological aspects of NOB

Nitrobacter sp. A67 cells were cultured at pH 6.1 and pH 7.1 and then stained using DAPI. The cells of Nitrobacter sp. A67 dispersed at pH 6.1, but formed dense aggregates at pH 7.1 (Fig. S3). Nitrobacter strain NHB1 performs nitrification by forming aggregates surrounding AOB at pH 4.0 and protecting AOB from the toxicity of nitrous acid (HNO2) (De Boer et al., 1991). Nitrobacter sp. A67 may protect itself from external stress and maintains its NO2– oxidation activity by forming aggregates at neutral pH. Further studies on Nitrobacter sp. A67 are required to elucidate the relationship between pH and aggregation. Additionally, Nitrobacter sp. A67, one of the NOB strains that accommodates moderately acidic pH, may provide insights into the mechanisms underlying NO2– oxidation activity in low pH environments. Genome information on strain A67 needs to be obtained in future studies in order to elucidate these mechanisms. The genes and transporters necessary for acidic adaptation may be found in the genome of strain A67. Apart from the genus Nitrobacter, two strains affiliated with the genus Nitrotoga, a group of ecologically important NOB, had an optimum pH in the slightly acidic range, whereas the majority of other cultures of Nitrobacter and Nitrotoga showed optimal pH in the neutral to slightly alkaline range (Spieck et al., 2021). Therefore, the adaptation of Nitrobacter and Nitrotoga to low pH may be specific to each strain. Since nitrite oxidation occurs in acidic environments, including soils, the isolation of acid-tolerant or acidophilic NOB is essential for understanding the physiology of these NOB.

Citation

Endo, Y., Fujitani, H., Kaneko, A., Ninomiya, T., Umezawa, C., Kuroiwa, M., and Suwa, Y. (2024) Isolation of a Moderately Acidophilic Nitrobacter from a Nitrifying Community Supplied with Urea. Microbes Environ 39: ME24027.

https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME24027

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material (362.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Shinya Ishida and Tomoyoshi Hashimoto for soil sampling. This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (18K19857). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

References

  1. Anthonisen, A.C., Loehr, R.C., Prakasam, T.B.S., and Srinath, E.G. (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J-Water Pollut Control Fed 48: 835–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Attard, E., Poly, F., Commeaux, C., Laurent, F., Terada, A., Smets, B.F., et al. (2010) Shifts between Nitrospira- and Nitrobacter-like nitrite oxidizers underlie the response of soil potential nitrite oxidation to changes in tillage practices. Environ Microbiol 12: 315–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bock, E., and Heinrich, G. (1969) Morphologische und physiologische untersuchungen an zellen Von Nitrobacter winogradskyi Buch. Arch Microbiol 69: 149–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daims, H., Lebedeva, E., Pjevac, P., Han, P., Herbold, C., Albertsen, M., et al. (2015) Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528: 504–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Boer, W., Gunnewiek, P., Veenhuis, M., Bock, E., and Laanbroek, H.J. (1991) Nitrification at low pH by aggregated chemolithotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 3600–3604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fujitani, H., Momiuchi, K., Ishii, K., Nomachi, M., Kikuchi, S., Ushiki, N., et al. (2020) Genomic and physiological characteristics of a novel nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira strain isolated from a drinking water treatment plant. Front Microbiol 11: 545190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, S., Zeng, L.Y., Luo, X.S., Xiong, X., Wen, S.L., Wang, B.R., et al. (2018) Shifts in Nitrobacter-and Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacterial communities under long-term fertilization practices. Soil Biol Biochem 124: 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hankinson, T.R., and Schmidt, E.L. (1988) An acidophilic and a neutrophilic Nitrobacter strain isolated from the numerically predominant nitrite-oxidizing population of an acid forest soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1536–1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayatsu, M., Tago, K., Uchiyama, I., Toyoda, A., Wang, Y., Shimomura, Y., et al. (2017) An acid-tolerant ammonia-oxidizing gamma-proteobacterium from soil. ISME J 11: 1130–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jukes, T.H., and Cantor, C.R. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Munro, H.N. (ed.) New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 21–132. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ke, X.B., Angel, R., Lu, Y.H., and Conrad, R. (2013) Niche differentiation of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers in rice paddy soil. Environ Microbiol 15: 2275–2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, D.J., Lee, D.I., and Keller, J. (2006) Effect of temperature and free ammonia on nitrification and nitrite accumulation in landfill leachate and ana­lysis of its nitrifying bacterial community by FISH. Bioresour Technol 97: 459–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35: 1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lehtovirta-Morley, L.E., Stoecker, K., Vilcinskas, A., Prosser, J.I., and Nicol, G.W. (2011) Cultivation of an obligate acidophilic ammonia oxidizer from a nitrifying acid soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 15892–15897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehtovirta-Morley, L.E., Ge, C., Ross, J., Yao, H., Nicol, G.W., and Prosser, J.I. (2014) Characterisation of terrestrial acidophilic archaeal ammonia oxidizers and their inhibition and stimulation by organic compounds. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 89: 542–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, Y.Y., Xi, R.J., Wang, W.J., and Yao, H.Y. (2019) The relative contribution of nitrifiers to autotrophic nitrification across a pH-gradient in a vegetable cropped soil. J Soils Sediments 19: 1416–1426. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, L., and Jia, Z.J. (2013) Urease gene-containing Archaea dominate autotrophic ammonia oxidation in two acid soils. Environ Microbiol 15: 1795–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miranda, K.M., Espey, M.G., and Wink, D.A. (2001) A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 5: 62–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ni, G., Leung, P.M., Daebeler, A., Guo, J., Hu, S., Cook, P., et al. (2023) Nitrification in acidic and alkaline environments. Essays Biochem 67: 753–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicol, G.W., Leininger, S., Schleper, C., and Prosser, J.I. (2008) The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10: 2966–2978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Norton, J., and Ouyang, Y. (2019) Controls and adaptive management of nitrification in agricultural soils. Front Microbiol 10: 1931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prosser, J.I., Hink, L., Gubry-Rangin, C., and Nicol, G.W. (2020) Nitrous oxide production by ammonia oxidizers: Physiological diversity, niche differentiation and potential mitigation strategies. Glob Chang Biol 26: 103–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson, G.P., Bruulsema, T.W., Gehl, R.J., Kanter, D., Mauzerall, D.L., Rotz, C.A., and Williams, C.O. (2013) Nitrogen-climate interactions in US agriculture. Biogeochemistry 114: 41–70. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sorokin, D.Y., Muyzer, G., Brinkhoff, T., Kuenen, J.G., and Jetten, M.S.M. (1998) Isolation and characterization of a novel facultatively alkaliphilic Nitrobacter species, N. alkalicus sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 170: 345–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sorokin, D.Y., Vejmelkova, D., Lücker, S., Streshinskaya, G.M., Rijpstra, W.I.C., Damsté, J.S.S., et al. (2014) Nitrolancea hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., a chemolithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a bioreactor belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64: 1859–1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spieck, E., Keuter, S., Wenzel, T., Bock, E., and Ludwig, W. (2014) Characterization of a new marine nitrite oxidizing bacterium, Nitrospina watsonii sp. nov., a member of the newly proposed phylum “Nitrospinae”. Syst Appl Microbiol 37: 170–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spieck, E., Wegen, S., and Keuter, S. (2021) Relevance of Candidatus Nitrotoga for nitrite oxidation in technical nitrogen removal systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105: 7123–7139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Suwa, Y., Imamura, Y., Suzuki, T., Tashiro, T., and Urushigawa, Y. (1994) Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria with different sensitivities to (NH4)2SO4 in activated sludges. Water Res 28: 1523–1532. [Google Scholar]
  30. Takahashi, Y., Fujitani, H., Hirono, Y., Tago, K., Wang, Y., Hayatsu, M., and Tsuneda, S. (2020) Enrichment of comammox and nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira from acidic soils. Front Microbiol 11: 1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tourna, M., Stieglmeier, M., Spang, A., Könneke, M., Schintlmeister, A., Urich, T., et al. (2011) Nitrososphaera viennensis, an ammonia oxidizing archaeon from soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 8420–8425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van Kessel, M., Speth, D., Albertsen, M., Nielsen, P., Op den Camp, H., Kartal, B., et al. (2015) Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature 528: 555–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vanparys, B., Spieck, E., Heylen, K., Wittebolle, L., Geets, J., Boon, N., and De Vos, P. (2007) The phylogeny of the genus Nitrobacter based on comparative rep-PCR, 16S rRNA and nitrite oxidoreductase gene sequence ana­lysis. Syst Appl Microbiol 30: 297–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, B.Z., Zheng, Y., Huang, R., Zhou, X., Wang, D.M., He, Y.Q., and Jia, Z.J. (2014a) Active ammonia oxidizers in an acidic soil are phylogenetically closely related to neutrophilic archaeon. Appl Environ Microbiol 80: 1684–1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, Q.L., Ye, L., Jiang, G.M., Hu, S.H., and Yuan, Z.G. (2014b) Side-stream sludge treatment using free nitrous acid selectively eliminates nitrite oxidizing bacteria and achieves the nitrite pathway. Water Res 55: 245–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Watson, S.W., and Waterbury, J.B. (1971) Characteristics of two marine nitrite oxidizing bacteria, Nitrospina gracilis nov. gen. nov. sp. and Nitrococcus mobilis nov. gen. nov. sp. Arch Microbiol 77: 203–230. [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson, S.W., Bock, E., Valois, F.W., Waterbury, J.B., and Schlosser, U. (1986) Nitrospira marina gen. nov. sp. nov.: a chemolithotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium. Arch Microbiol 144: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wertz, S., Leigh, A.K.K., and Grayston, S.J. (2012) Effects of long-term fertilization of forest soils on potential nitrification and on the abundance and community structure of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79: 142–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, F., Yang, H., Wang, J.W., Liu, Z.Q., and Guan, Q.K. (2018) Effect of free ammonia inhibition on NOB activity in high nitrifying performance of sludge. RSC Adv 8: 31987–31995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zheng, M., Wang, Z.Y., Meng, J., Hu, Z.T., Liu, Y.C., Yuan, Z.G., and Hu, S.H. (2021) Inactivation kinetics of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by free nitrous acid. Sci Total Environ 752: 141876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material (362.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 was deposited at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession number LC702421. The nxrB gene sequence of Nitrobacter sp. A67 was deposited at DDBJ under the accession number LC702422.

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES