Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Surgery logoLink to The British Journal of Surgery
. 1981 Nov 1;68(11):766–770. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681105

Radionuclide biliary scanning in acute pancreatitis*

Geoffrey Glazer 1, Frank Murphy 2, Gerald S Clayden 3, Rosemary G Lawrence 4, Oscar Craig 5
PMCID: PMC11428041  PMID: 7296245

Summary

Radionuclide biliary scanning with 99Tcm-labelled HIDA was performed in 36 patients with acute pancreatitis within 3 days of admission. Twenty had a non-visualized gallbladder on scanning and all were subsequently shown by cholecystography (n = 16) andlor operation (n = 16) to have underlying gallstones; 5 of the 16 cholecystograms revealed a ‘functioning’ gallbladder. Sixteen patients had normal HIDA scans with gallbladder visualization, and subsequently all were shown by cholecystography (n = 15) or operation (n = 1) to have a normal biliary tree; 15 of these had an alcoholic background. In the differentiation of gallstone from non-gallstone pancreatitis, biliary scanning was completely accurate and a better discriminant than the liver function profile or the clinical features, the latter being valueless.

Whether or not the gallbladder is visualized on biliary scanning depends on the presence or absence of cystic duct obstruction, a fact confirmed in two other groups: in 53 patients with acute cholecystitis and non-visualized gallbladders on scanning, 52 were subsequently shown to have ‘non-functioning’ gallbladders by oral cholecystography (1 having stones in a functioning gallbladder), whereas 9 other patients with normal biliary scans, all had ‘functioning’ gallbladders on oral cholecystography.

Thus, acute gallstone pancreatitis appears to be accompanied in the early stages by occlusion of the cystic duct, though this is a transient phenomenon in about one-third of the patients. The cause of this occlusion may be oedema in some cases but its relationship to the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis is unclear.

Contributor Information

Geoffrey Glazer, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY.

Frank Murphy, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY.

Gerald S Clayden, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY.

Rosemary G Lawrence, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY.

Oscar Craig, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY.

References

  • 1. Prince  M: Pancreatic apoplexy with a report of two cases. Boston Med. Surg. J.  1882; 107: 28–32 and 55–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Acosta  J M, Rossi  R, Galli  O M R  et al. : Early surgery for acute gallstone pancreatitis: evaluation of a systemic approach. Surgery  1978; 83: 367–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Matolo  N M, Stadalnik  R C, Krohn  K A  et al. : Biliary tract scanning with 99Tcm-pyridoxilidene glutamate: a new gallbladder scanning agent. Surgery  1976; 80: 317–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weissman  H S, Frank  M S, Bernstein  L H  et al. : Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with 99Tcm-HIDA cholescintigraphy. Am. J. Roentgenol.  1979; 132: 523–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. O'callaghan  J D, Verow  P W, Hopton  D  et al. : The diagnosis of acute gallbladder disease by technetium-99m-labelled HIDA hepatobiliary scanning. Br. J. Surg.  1980; 67: 805–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Graham  D F and Wyllie Frances  J: Prediction of gallstone pancreatitis by computer. Br. Med J.  1979; 1: 515–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Paloyan  D and Simonowitz  D: Diagnostic considerations in acute alcoholic and gallstone pancreatitis. Am. J. Surg.  1976; 132: 329–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McMahon  M J and Pickford  I R: Biochemical prediction of gallstones early in an attack of acute pancreatitis. Lancet  1979; 2: 541–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dammann  H G, Dopner  M, Wichert  P  et al. : Gallstones and acute pancreatitis. Lancet  1980; 1: 308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ranson  J H C, Rifkind  K M, Roses  D F  et al. : Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.  1974; 139: 69–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Taplin  G V, Meredith  O M and Kade  H: Radioactive (131I tagged) rose bengal uptake-excretion test for liver function using external gamma-ray scintillation counting techniques. J. Lab. Clin. Med.  1955; 45: 665–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Baker  R J, Belien  J C and Ronai  P M: 99MTechnetium pyridoxilidene glutamate: a new rapid cholescintigraphic agent. J. Nucl. Med.  1974; 15: 476. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ronai  P M, Baker  R J, Belien  J C  et al. : Technetium-99m-pyridoxilidene glutamate: a new hepatobiliary radiopharmaceutical. II. Clinical aspects. J. Nucl. Med.  1975; 16: 728–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ryan  J, Cooper  M, Loberg  M  et al. : Technetium 99m-labelled N-(2,6 dimethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl) iminodiacetic acid (99mTc-HIDA). A new radiopharmaceutical for hepatobiliary imaging studies. J. Nucl. Med.  1977; 18: 997–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Murphy  F, Hinton  J, Craig  J O M C  et al. : The results of biliary scanning with 99mTc pyridoxylidene glutamate in jaundiced patients. Br. J. Surg.  1978; 65: 812.31227 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Williams  J A R, Baker  R J, Walsh  J R  et al. : The role of biliary scanning in the investigation of surgically jaundiced patients. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.  1977; 144: 525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Adams  J T, Libertino  J A and Schwartz  S I  Significance of elevated serum amylase. Surgery  1968; 63: 877–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lesser  P B and Warshaw  A L: Differentiation of pancreatitis from common bile duct obstruction with hyperamylasaemia. Gastroenterology  1975; 68: 636–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ranson  J H C: The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann. Surg.  1979; 189: 654–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. McMahon  M J and Pickford  I R  Gallstones and acute pancreatitis. Lancet  1980; 1: 545–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kaden  V C, Howard  J M and Doubleday  L C: Cholecystographic studies during and immediately following acute pancreatitis. Surgery  1955; 38: 1082–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Burrell  M I, Avella  J, Spiro  H M  et al. : Diagnostic imaging procedures in acute pancreatitis: a comparison of ultrasound, intravenous cholangiography and oral cholecystography. JAMA  1979; 242: 342–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. McKay  A J, Duncan  J G, Imrie  C W  et al. : A prospective study of the clinical value and accuracy of grey scale ultrasound in detecting gallstones. Br. J. Surg.  1978; 65: 330–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Acosta  J M and Ledesma  C L: Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N. Engl. J. Med.  1974; 290: 484–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kelly  T R: Gallstone pancreatitis: pathophysiology. Surgery  1976; 80: 488–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Opie  E L: The aetiology of acute haemorrhagic pancreatitis. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.  1901; 12: 182–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. McMahon  M J and Shefta  J R: Physical characteristics of gallstones and the calibre of the cystic duct in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br. J. Surg.  1980; 67: 6–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Weiner  S, Gramatica  L, Voegle  L D  et al. : Role of the lymphatic system in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disease in the biliary tract and pancreas. Am. J. Surg.  1970; 119: 55–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES