Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2024 Sep 27;74(9):006516. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006516

Characterization of gut symbionts from wild-caught Drosophila and other Diptera: description of Utexia brackfieldae gen. nov., sp. nov., Orbus sturtevantii sp. nov., Orbus wheelerorum sp. nov, and Orbus mooreae sp. nov.

Laila E Phillips 1,*, Kathleen L Sotelo 1, Nancy A Moran 1
PMCID: PMC11434166  PMID: 39331838

Abstract

Non-culture based surveys show that the bacterial family Orbaceae is widespread in guts of insects, including wild Drosophila. Relatively few isolates have been described, and none has been described from Drosophila. We present the isolation and characterization of five strains of Orbaceae from wild-caught flies of the genera Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and Neogriphoneura (Diptera: Lauxaniidae). Cells are generally rod-shaped, mesophilic, and measure 0.8–2.0 µm long by 0.3–0.5 µm wide. Optimal growth was observed under ambient atmosphere. Reconstruction of phylogenies from the 16S rRNA gene and from single-copy orthologs verify placement of these strains within Orbaceae. Cells exhibited similar fatty acid profiles to those of other Orbaceae. Strain lpD01T shared 74% average nucleotide identity (ANI) with its closest relatives Ca. Schmidhempelia bombi Bimp and Zophobihabitans entericus IPMB12T. Results from multiple genome-wide similarity comparisons indicate lpD01T should be classified as a novel species within a novel genus. The major respiratory quinone for lpD01T is ubiquinone Q-8. lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT are more closely related to Orbus hercynius CN3T (76, 77, 76, and 77% ANI, respectively) than to other described Orbaceae. Genomic and phylogenetic analyses suggest that lpD03 and lpD04T belong to the same species and that lpD02T, lpD03/lpD04T, and BiBT are each novel species of the genus Orbus. The proposed names of these strains are Utexia brackfieldae gen. nov., sp. nov. (type strain lpD01T =NCIMB 15517T =ATCC TSD-399T), Orbus sturtevantii sp. nov (type strain lpD02T =NCIMB 15518T =ATCC TSD-400T), Orbus wheelerorum sp. nov. (type strain lpD04T =NCIMB 15520T =ATCC TSD-401T), and Orbus mooreae sp. nov (type strain BiBT=NCIMB 15516T =ATCC TSD-402T). The isolation and characterization of these strains expands the repertoire of culturable bacteria naturally associated with insects, including the model organism D. melanogaster.

Keywords: Drosophila, host specificity, host-associated microbiota, insect microbiome, Orbaceae, symbiosis

Introduction

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a favoured model for animal genetics, and more recently a model for gut microbiome research due to its compositionally simple and experimentally tractable gut microbiota [1]. However, little is known about the natural gut microbiome of Diptera and the molecular bases of colonization of the dipteran gut by commensal bacteria. Most experimental studies concerning the Drosophila microbiome have been performed using bacteria that are widespread in different environments and that are associated with lab-reared flies but less common in natural populations. As a result, the isolation of host-restricted bacteria that are naturally associated with flies is a welcome supplement to the D. melanogaster model system, and even more beneficial when they are amenable to genetic engineering and other experimental manipulations.

Non-culture-based studies of gut microbiomes of wild Diptera, particularly of the genus Drosophila, indicate a high relative abundance of bacteria in the family Orbaceae [2,5]. The first member of this family was described by Volkmann et al. [6] upon isolation of Orbus hercynius CN3T from wild boar faeces [6]. The family Orbaceae with O. hercynius as the type species was later proposed by Kwong and Moran following isolation of Gilliamella apicola from the honey bee, Apis mellifera [7]. Subsequent non-culture-based sampling of gut microbiotas from a variety of insect taxa has revealed a specific association between Orbaceae and insects, and studies of Gilliamella spp. and honeybees demonstrate the experimental potential of this family [8,12].

Over a dozen species of Orbaceae have been formally characterized and described [6,7, 13,19], but none has been isolated from a fly. Studying Orbaceae in D. melanogaster may facilitate the identification of molecular mechanisms governing colonization, host specificity, and interbacterial dynamics of commensal bacteria, due to the availability of genetic tools for hosts and their potential development for these symbionts.

Here we describe five strains of bacteria in the family Orbaceae newly isolated from wild-caught flies.

Methods

Isolation

Flies were collected using baits of fermented banana and yeast [20] between 2018 and 2022 at Brackenridge Field Laboratory and a residential area in Austin, Texas, USA. Flies were photographed and surface sterilized with 10% w/v sodium hypochlorite. Wings and legs were removed and stored in 95% v/v ethanol for subsequent DNA extraction to confirm species identity of flies. Single flies were homogenized in Insectagro (Corning, AZ, USA) using a sterile micropestle and serial dilutions of the homogenate were plated onto heart infusion agar (HIA) with 5% v/v defibrinated sheep’s blood (HIAb) and incubated at 30 °C and 5% CO2. Single colonies with a morphology resembling other Orbaceae (transparent perimeter with an off-white centre in a ‘bullseye’ pattern) were inoculated in Insectagro and subsequently stored as glycerol stocks (20% v/v) at −80 °C.

Host identification by mitochondrial DNA barcoding

DNA was extracted from preserved wings and legs using the supplementary protocol ‘Purification of total DNA from insects using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit’ from the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). PCR amplification of mitochondrial genes was performed using primers LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′; forward) and HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′; reverse) [21] for cytochrome oxidase I (COI), and primers A-tLEU (5′-ATGGCAGATTAGTGCAATGG-3′; forward) and B-tLYS (5′-GTTTAAGAGACCAGTACTTG-3′; reverse) [22] for cytochrome oxidase II (COII). COI PCR amplicons were Sanger sequenced at the Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility (GSAF) at the University of Texas at Austin (UT-Austin, USA). COII PCR amplicons were nanopore-sequenced (Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT], Oxford, UK) by Plasmidsaurus (OR, USA). COI and COII sequences were aligned to the NCBI nt database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (blast) [23], and COI sequences were also aligned to the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) database [24].

16S rRNA gene phylogeny

Initial phylogenetic analysis was performed using 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Bacterial lysates were used as the template for PCR amplification of an Orbaceae-specific ~750 bp region of the 16S rRNA gene using primers 27f-CM (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′; forward) [25] and Orbaceae-specific primer Orb742R (5′-ATCTCAGCGTCAGTATCTGTCCAGAA-3′; reverse) [26]. Amplicons were purified using the QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and submitted for Sanger sequencing at the UT-Austin GSAF as described previously. Sequences were trimmed in Geneious Prime (v. 2021.1) and aligned to the NCBI nt database using blast [23]. Isolates yielding sequences closest to Orbaceae 16S rRNA sequences were inoculated in Insectagro or BD BBL brain heart infusion broth (BHI; Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) and grown for 2 days at 30 °C and 5% CO2. Genomic DNA was extracted from these cultures using the ‘Pretreatment for Gram-Negative Bacteria’ and ‘Purification of Total DNA from Animal Blood or Cells’ protocols for the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). A longer portion of the 16S rRNA gene (~1450 bp) was amplified via PCR with universal bacterial 16S rRNA primers 16SA1 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′; forward) and 16SB1 (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′; reverse) [27] and amplicons were purified as described previously. Amplicons were Sanger-sequenced using the same primers by the UT-Austin GSAF. Trimming and alignment to obtain the consensus sequence for the near-full 16S rRNA gene was performed in Geneious Prime (v. 2021.1). Final, full-length (~1535 bp) 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from subsequently assembled genomes using Barrnap (v. 0.9) [28], which agreed with those obtained via PCR amplicon sequencing.

For phylogenetic analysis, Orbaceae and outgroup 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from NCBI or extracted from RefSeq assemblies using Barrnap (v. 0.9) when 16S rRNA sequences were not available. SSU-Align [29] (v. 0.1.1) was used to align and mask sequences for a final maximum length of 1468 residues. mega [30] (v. 11.0.11) was used to identify the best-fit model, and mega-CC [31] was used to reconstruct a maximum-likelihood phylogeny using the Kimura two-parameter (K2) model with proportion of invariable sites (+I) and gamma distribution (+G) and 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Genome features

Genomic analyses were performed using whole genome sequence assemblies obtained from long- and short-read sequencing. Glycerol stocks were streaked onto HIAb and grown for 3–4 days. Plates were sent to SeqCenter (Pittsburgh, PA) for DNA extraction, sequencing, and assembly. DNA extraction was performed using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. Genome sequencing was based on a combination of Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) short reads and nanopore long reads. Libraries were prepared with the ONT Ligation Sequencing Kit (ONT, SQK-LSK109), NEBNext Companion Module (E7180L; New England Biolabs, MA, USA) and ONT Native Barcode Kits (ONT, EXP-NBD104, EXP-NBD114). Samples were run on Nanopore R9.4.1 flow cells and a MinION Mk1B device. Guppy (v. 5.0.16) was used for high-accuracy base calling and demultiplexing [32]. Illumina sequencing was performed as paired-end (2×151 bp) reads on a NovaSeq X. Quality control and adapter trimming was performed using default parameters in the proprietary Illumina software bcl-convert (v. 3.9.3) for Illumina reads and porechop (v. 0.2.3_seqan2.1.1) [33] for ONT reads. Hybrid assembly of Illumina and nanopore reads was performed using Unicycler (v. 0.4.8) [34]. Assembly statistics were recorded using QUAST (v. 5.0.2) [35].

Baseline assembly metrics for the presently-described strains and previously-described Orbaceae were calculated using genomes annotated using the RAST Server [36,38]. Annotated assemblies were assessed for quality and completeness using CheckM (v. 1.1.6) [39] and BUSCO (v. 5.4.7) [40,41]. tRNAs were predicted using trnaSCAN-SE (v. 2.0.12) [42] using default options for bacterial genomes. All tRNAs flagged as possible pseudogenes were removed. Barrnap (v. 0.9) [28] was used to extract full ribosomal RNA gene sequences from assembled genomes.

Pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) based on BLASTN+ alignments (ANIb) [23,43] and tetranucleotide frequency analysis (TI) were calculated in anvi’o (v. 8.0) [44] using PyANI 0.2.12 [45]. Reported ANIb values are averages of the reciprocal comparisons. In silico ddDH values were obtained using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) v. 3.0 [46,47] with the BLAST+ alignment and Formula two options selected via the online portal (https://ggdc.dsmz.de). Pairwise average amino acid identity (AAI) estimation of RAST-annotated assemblies was performed using the online tool AAI-matrix (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/g-matrix) [48].

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using 856 single-copy orthologs shared between the presently-described strains and other Orbaceae for which whole genome sequences were available. Escherichia coli ATCC 11775T was included as an outgroup. Assemblies were annotated using the RAST server [36] and orthogroups were identified using OrthoFinder [49] (v. 2.5.5). Single-copy orthologs were aligned using muscle [50] (v. 5.1), and alignments were trimmed using ClipKIT [51] (v. 1.3.0). IQ-TREE (v. 2.2.5) [52] was used to identify the best-fit model via ModelFinder [53] and reconstruct the phylogeny from trimmed alignments. The general amino-acid exchange rate matrix (LG) [54] with empirical amino acid frequencies (+F), proportion of invariable sites (+I), and the FreeRate model of heterogeneity across sites with five categories [55,56] was used. Non-parametric bootstrapping was performed with 1000 replicates.

Genes encoding secretion systems were predicted from RAST-annotated assemblies using MacSyFinder (v. 2.0) via the TXSScan model (v. 1.1.0) [57,60]. Further analyses were performed using anvi’o [44]. Genes and pathways underlying metabolism were predicted using the programme anvi-estimate-metabolism according to Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthologs (KOs) in the KEGG MODULE database [61,63]. Modules for which ≥75% required genes were detected were considered complete. Pangenome analysis was performed using the programme anvi-pan-genome and annotated according to KEGG, NCBI Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs) [64,65], and Pfam [66,67] databases. Assemblies were annotated with COGs using DIAMOND [68] in sensitive mode. A functional enrichment analysis according to host order was performed on all Orbaceae assemblies using the programme anvi-compute-functional-enrichment-in-pan.

Physiology and biochemical characteristics

Morphology and size were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Strains were grown on HIAb for 4 days. Fixative comprised of 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde in 0.1M sodium cacodylate was added either directly to the colonies on the plates, or a small disc of ACLAR was carefully touched to the colonies to adhere them to the surface. Cells were fixed overnight at room temperature. The following day, colonies remaining on plates were carefully transferred to 1.5 ml tubes, and 1% w/v osmium tetroxide in 0.1M sodium cacodylate was added to all samples. Cells were washed with DI water before adding freshly-prepared and 0.22-µm-filtered 1% w/v thiocarbohydrazide in DI water. Samples were washed before adding the 1% osmium tetroxide solution an additional time, followed by a final wash. Samples were left overnight in DI water at room temperature. The following day, dehydration was performed by sequentially adding ethanol at the following concentrations: 15, 30, 50, 70, 90, 95, and 100% (v/v). Samples were then immersed in 1 : 1 100% ethanol:hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), then 100% HMDS, and allowed to dry completely. Samples were sputter-coated in 5 nm platinum and palladium. Samples were imaged at 5 kV with a working distance of 8–12 mm on a Zeiss Supra 40VP Scanning Electron Microscope. The purity of each culture used for SEM was confirmed using a plate streak method on HIAb, and expected identities of the cultures were confirmed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

Strains were subjected to various growth experiments to determine the optimal growth conditions and media. Rate of growth and cellular density were taken into consideration when determining optimal ranges. Growth in different liquid media was tested by inoculating wells of a 96-well plate containing 200 µl BHI, LB, trypticase soy broth (TSB), Columbia broth (CB), or Insectagro with 1 µl of cultures adjusted to absorbance OD600=1.0. Absorbance was measured following a shaking step every hour for 48 h. In a similar experiment, growth was assessed after 48 h in CB, fastidious anaerobe broth (FAB), liver infusion broth (LIB), M9 minimal media, marine broth (MB), tryptose broth (TB), and TSB. Growth on agar media was tested by streaking a single colony onto the agar surface followed by incubation for 5–7 days at 30 °C. The rate of growth and the size of isolated colonies were taken into consideration when assessing results. Growth under different oxygen conditions was assessed by growing strains on HIAb plates and in 96-well plates containing BHI at 30 and 35 °C in atmospheric O2, 5% CO2, or inside sealed pouches containing CO2 or anaerobic sachets (GasPak EZ Pouch Systems; Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA). A separate experiment testing growth under different agitation conditions (still or 100 r.p.m.) in 5% CO2 and atmospheric O2 was conducted by inoculating 5 ml cultures of BHI with 10 µl of OD600=1.0 overnight culture for each strain and measuring OD600 after 24 and 48 h for each condition. NaCl tolerance was determined by measuring the OD600 of each strain grown in media supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl. In an initial experiment, NaCl was added to BHI powder already containing 0.5% w/v NaCl, for final concentrations in increments of 1.0% NaCl ranging from 0.5–6.5% NaCl. Strains were grown for 96 h at 30 °C and 5% CO2. In a subsequent experiment, strains were grown in 2X YTD (2X yeast extract tryptone medium supplemented with 0.3% w/v dextrose) containing 0.0–3.5% added NaCl in 0.5% increments for 72 h at 30 °C under ambient atmosphere. Optimal pH was determined by measuring absorbance at OD600 of each strain grown in BHI adjusted to pH 4.0–10.0 and CB adjusted to pH 6.0–9.0 in 0.5 pH increments every 24 h up to 96 h at 30 °C. Growth at different temperatures was assessed by inoculating BHI with 1 µl of OD600=1.0 overnight cultures for each strain and measuring OD600 on a Spark 20M plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) every 24 h up to 72 h.

Strains were assessed for lyophilization tolerance to identify additional culture preservation methods. BHI (5 ml) was inoculated with a single colony of bacteria using a sterile toothpick and grown for 24–48 h. The starting absorbance of these cultures was OD600≥0.3. Cultures were separated into 2 ml aliquots and spun at 4 000 r.p.m. for 10 min and resuspended in 500 µl of ATCC Medium 9520. Samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to lyophilization. Cultures were revived after 3 days by adding 0.5 ml BHI and incubating at room temperature for 10 min. Viability was assessed by plating serial dilutions of the culture on HIAb.

Motility was tested by stabbing a single colony into Motility Agar with TTC (Hardy Diagnostics, CA, USA). Tubes were removed from incubation after 5 days and left on a bench at room temperature. Results were confirmed a week later. Follow-up experiments were performed using semisolid Columbia agar (0.25 and 0.30% w/v agar). Briefly, 1.5 µl of 24–48 h cultures were spotted on the centre of 0.25% Columbia agar plates and incubated at 30 °C. A subsequent experiment intended to assess twitching motility using 0.30% Columbia agar was performed; plates were inoculated in the centre by taking a loop of bacterial culture, mixing it into 0.30% Columbia agar, then using a sharp toothpick to stab a blob of the mixture through to the bottom of the plate. The formation of an interstitial colony potentially indicates twitching motility [69].

Biofilm formation in Insectagro was assessed for strains lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and BiBT compared to biofilm-forming Snodgrassella alvi wkB2T by inoculating 180 µl with 20 µl of OD600=1.0 culture in a tissue culture-treated 96-well plate (Corning, NY, USA). After incubating for 48 h at 30 °C and 5% CO2, media was removed and the plate was washed twice with DI H2O before staining each well with 0.1% w/v crystal violet solution (Ward’s Science, NY, USA) for 15 min. The stain was removed, washed four times with deionized H2O, and dried for 3 h in a biosafety cabinet. Any residual cells stained with crystal violet were solubilized using 30% w/v acetic acid, and the absorbance was measured at OD550.

Oxidase activity was assessed by smearing colonies onto OxiStrips (Hardy Diagnostics, CA, USA) and observing colour changes after incubation at room temperature for 120 s. Strains were considered oxidase-positive if a colour change occurred in less than 30 s, delayed oxidase-positive if a colour change occurred between 30–90 s, and oxidase negative if no colour change was observed. Catalase activity was tested by submerging pelleted cells in 3.0% v/v hydrogen peroxide and observing bubble formation. Activity of nitrate reductase, ornithine decarboxylase, β-galactosidase, urease, and tryptophan deaminase, as well as indole and acetoin production, and glucose, mannose, and xylose fermentation were assessed using the Microgen GN-ID A System (Microgen Bioproducts Ltd, Surrey, UK). Each strain was streaked onto HIAb and grown for 2–4 days until colonies were large enough for isolation. A single colony was suspended in 3 ml 0.85% w/v NaCl and 100 µl of the suspension was added to each well of the microwell test strip. Tests were repeated three times; twice with 48 h incubation periods as suggested by the manufacturer, and once with a 72 h incubation period to determine if possible false negatives occurred due to insufficient incubation time. Strips were incubated for 48 h at 30 °C. Following incubation, the following reagents were added to the appropriate wells: Kovacs’ reagent (Remel, KS, USA), Voges-Proskauer reagents 40% w/v KOH and 5.0% w/v α-naphthol (Remel), and TDA reagent (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK). A nitrate reduction test was performed by adding nitrate reagents A and B (Remel). A small amount of zinc powder (Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) was added to wells of the nitrate reduction test that remained colourless. Glucose, lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, H2S, and gas production were assessed using an 8 ml triple sugar iron (TSI) agar slant (Hardy Diagnostics) by stabbing a single colony into the middle of the slant, streaking the agar surface, and incubating for a total of 7 days. Results were checked 1, 5, and 7 days after inoculation. DNase activity was assessed using BD DNAse Test Agar. Briefly, single colonies were streaked in triplicate onto DNAse agar and incubated for 4 days at 30 °C. HCl (1 N) was added to each plate and allowed to sit for ~2 min to observe if clearance zones indicating depolymerized DNA appeared.

Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed via a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay in a 96-well plate format as described in Elston et al. [26]. Briefly, 2X serial dilutions of carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, spectinomycin, and tetracycline were prepared to test concentrations of 800–3.125 µg ml−1 in 100 µl media. Each well was inoculated with 1 µl of OD600=1.0 culture.

The presently-described strains except for lpD04T were previously genetically engineered via conjugation [26]. We intoduced Pathfinder plasmids into lpD04T via Escherichia coli MFDpir containing pSL1 or pSL1-GFP as detailed in Elston et al. [26].

Chemotaxonomy

The fatty acid profiles for the presently-described strains were assessed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. (NJ, USA). Briefly, pure colonies were removed from culture plates, and fatty acids were extracted using the Instant FAME method developed for the Sherlock Microbial Identification System by Biolog, Inc. (DE, USA; previously MIDI, Inc.) [70]. Following extraction, fatty acid methyl esters were assessed using an Agilent 6890 series gas chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., CA, USA) [70].

Respiratory quinone analysis was carried out by DSMZ Services, Leibniz-Institut DSMZ – Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.

Results

Isolation

Five strains were identified as potentially novel species of Orbaceae by 16S rRNA gene amplicon and whole genome sequencing. Strains confirmed as Orbaceae were grown for 48 h in Insectagro or BHI and amended with glycerol (20% v/v) to create stocks for cryopreservation at −80 °C.

Host identification by mitochondrial DNA barcoding

Mitochondrial gene sequences from flies from which strains lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and lpD04T were isolated aligned most closely to sequences associated with Neogriphoneura sordida, Drosophila cardini, Drosophila meridiana, and Drosophila melanogaster, respectively. There was insufficient DNA available for molecular identification of the fly from which strain BiBT was isolated, but it was identified as a species in the genus Drosophila based on morphology.

16S rRNA gene phylogeny

The 16S rRNA gene phylogeny places strains lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT within the family Orbaceae (Fig. 1). Strain lpD01T forms a distinct lineage within the Orbaceae, and its closest relatives are Ca. Schmidhempelia bombi Bimp [71] and two other uncultured bacteria from Bombus spp. Strains lpD02T, lpD03, and lpD04T are closely related to each other, and are part of a lineage of uncultured bacteria associated with Drosophila spp. BiBT is part of a lineage of uncultured bacteria associated with Drosophila and two other fly genera, Bactrocera and Musca. Its closest cultured relatives are Orbus hercynius CN3T and Orbus sasakiae C7T. Notably, this phylogeny suggests a general association between distinct lineages of Orbaceae and order of the insect host, with few exceptions.

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the Orbales based on the 16S rRNA gene; the Enterobacterales and Pasteurellales are included as outgroups. The presently-described strains are indicated in bold with an arrow. Parentheses indicate NCBI accession numbers except for DC005 and DC022, which are from reference [3], and DM001 and DM012, which are from reference [2]. The source of isolation is indicated in brackets, and the corresponding host order is indicated according to colour. * = putatively fly-associated [6]. The scale bar represents 0.1 nucleotide substitutions per site.

Fig. 1.

Genome features

The assemblies for lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT ranged from ~2.4–3.0 Mb, within the range known for Orbaceae (Table 1). The largest contigs for all strains except for lpD03 were circular, representing the main chromosome. The second largest contigs for lpD02T and lpD03 were circular with higher coverage, indicating they are likely plasmids. GenBank Assembly accession numbers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Genome characteristics of strains lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT compared to previously described species of the family Orbaceae and Escherichia coli ATCC 11775T.

Strain Genome size (Mb) CDS G+C content (%) Contigs tRNAs rRNAs N50 Busco (%) CheckM (%) NCBI assembly
lpD01T 2.4 2231 41.3 1 48 14 2 386 378 97 99 GCA_036251705.1
lpD02T 2.9 2618 37.2 2 50 13 2 838 661 97 99 GCA_036251875.1
lpD03 3.0 2690 36.2 5 49 13 2 993 133 98 99 GCA_036326945.1
lpD04T 2.9 2574 36.0 1 50 13 2 890 389 98 99 GCA_036251935.1
BiBT 2.9 2818 35.7 1 55 13 2 925 206 97 99 GCA_036251205.1
Frischella japonica Ac13T 2.7 2490 34.5 40 48 4 219 086 97 98 GCA_014489845.1
Frischella perrara PEB0191T 2.7 2375 34.1 1 53 13 2 692 351 98 98 GCA_000807275.1
Gilliamella apicola wkB1T 3.1 2883 33.6 1 52 12 3 139 412 98 99 GCA_000599985.1
Gilliamella apicola wkB7 2.9 2583 34.0 1 52 12 2 901 642 98 99 GCA_001693435.1
Gilliamella apis NO3T 2.5 2383 34.7 54 43 6 100 334 98 99 GCA_002142155.1
Gilliamella bombi LMG 29879T 2.6 2609 34.6 163 42 3 55 982 98 99 GCA_900103255.1
Gilliamella bombicola LMG 28359T 2.3 2225 35.9 34 45 4 113 150 97 98 GCA_900094945.1
Gilliamella intestini LMG 28358T 2.5 2539 34.6 123 44 2 46 484 97 99 GCA_900094935.1
Gilliamella mensalis LMG 29880T 2.3 2155 35.5 46 42 3 167 669 97 98 GCA_900103085.1
Orbus hercynius CN3T 2.4 2180 38.8 16 45 4 395 466 97 99 GCA_003634275.1
Ca. Schmidhempelia bombi Bimp 2.2 2067 36.4 131 51 16 38 219 95 97 GCA_000471645.3
Zophobihabitans entericus IPMB12T 2.7 2384 39.3 2 46 13 2 634 037 98 99 GCA_011745665.1
Escherichia coli ATCC 11775T 5.0 4984 50.6 2 86 22 4 903 501 100 100 GCA_003697165.2

The genomic G+C content ranged from 35.7–41.3%, falling within the range of ~34.0–40.0% characteristic of other members of the family Orbaceae (Table 1). lpD01T had six 5S, four 16S, and six 23S rRNA genes. lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT had five 5S, four 16S, and six 23S rRNA genes. In all pairwise genomic comparisons between the novel strains and previously-described Orbaceae, values were below the species-level cutoff (ANIb/AAI <96.0%, dDDH <70.0%, TI<99.8%; Figs 2, S1, available in the online version of this article). Though lpD01T is most closely related to Ca. Schmidhempelia bombi Bimp (Figs 1, 2), pairwise comparisons suggest that this strain represents a distinct, novel genus (ANI=74.3 %, AAI=71.3%). This suggestion is also based on emerging patterns in similarity indices for previously-described Orbaceae, as those classified as the same genus share ANI and AAI values ≥75.0% or higher. Pairwise comparisons between lpD03 and lpD04T indicate that these strains belong to the same novel species (dDDH=84.1%, ANIb=98.3%, AAI=97.8%; Figs 2, S1). Strains lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT are more closely related to Orbus hercynius CN3T (75.8, 76.5, 76.4, and 77.2% ANI, respectively) than to other described Orbaceae, suggesting they should be placed as novel species within the genus Orbus.

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Orbaceae based on 856 single copy orthologs and corresponding average nucleotide identity (ANIb) values. Accession numbers for assemblies are available in Table 1. Nodes with 100% bootstrap support are indicated with a black circle. The phylogeny scale bar represents 0.1 nucleotide substitutions per site. ANIb values below the suggested species cutoff of 96% are indicated in shades of red, and ANIb values at or above the suggested species cutoff are indicated in white or blue, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Genes encoding type IVa pili, type Va secretion systems, and type VI secretion systems, subtype i were shared by the presently-described strains and O. hercynius CN3T (Fig. S2) [6]. Complete systems not detected included flagella, mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin pili (MSH), type II secretion systems, type III secretion systems, type IV secretion systems subtypes B, C, F, G, I, T, type IVb pili, type VI secretion systems subtypes ii and iii, type IX secretion systems, and type IV protein secretion system subtype i.

A table containing complete KEGG modules identified in anvi’o using anvi-estimate-metabolism for all Orbaceae type strains, G. apicola wkB7, and lpD03 is available in Table S1. Genes with notable differences between host order groups are shown in Table 2. Pangenomic analysis of Orbaceae revealed 8 638 groups of orthologous genes (orthogroups; referred to as ‘gene clusters’ in anvi’o), 983 of which were core clusters (conservatively defined as those present in all Orbaceae assemblies included in the analysis), 3 288 of which were present in more than one genome (‘accessory clusters’), and 4 367 of which were unique (Fig. S3). Eleven orthogroups, defined on the basis of homology, were ubiquitous across the six fly-associated Orbaceae and absent from all other genomes included in the analysis (‘core dipteran’; Fig. S3, Table S2). These orthogroups putatively encode genes involved in energy production and conversion, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, inorganic ion transfer and metabolism, defence mechanisms, and proteins of unknown or generally-predicted functions. Of these, certain orthogroups encoding stalled ribosome alternative rescue factor (ArfA) and a specific acetyltransferase (Eis) according to COG annotation were only found in all six fly-associated Orbaceae genomes. Orthologous genes encoding the catalytic subunit of an aromatic ring-opening dioxygenase (LigB family) were found exclusively in fly-associated Orbaceae, though a separate orthogroup annotated with the same function was also identified in the genome of Z. entericus IPMB12T, isolated from a beetle. According to Pfam annotation, all compared Orbaceae genomes contained a single-copy gene cluster putatively encoding a FUSC-like inner membrane protein (YccS) potentially involved in resistance to fusaric acid, but five additional gene clusters in the fusaric acid resistance protein family were exclusively found in fly-associated Orbaceae. Two COG-annotated penicillin V acyclase or related amidase, Ntn superfamily (YxeI) protein-coding orthogroups were found exclusively in fly-associated Orbaceae. Penicillin and fusaric acid are antimicrobial secondary metabolite produced by fungi in the genera Penicillium and Fusarium, respectively [72,73]; an expanded resistance strategy to mycotoxins may reflect exposure to these toxins due to the saprophagous diet of many Diptera.

Table 2. Select genes annotated with NCBI COGs in anvi’o and sorted and assigned enrichment scores with the programme anvi-compute-functional-enrichment-in-pan and grouped according to host order. Select genes with enrichment scores >9 and unadjusted p-values <0.01 are shown.

Strains: 1, lpD01T; 2, lpD02T; 3, lpD03; 4, lpD04T; 5, BiBT; 6, Orbus hercynius CN3T; 7, Frischella japonica Ac13T; 8, Frischella perrara PEB0191T; 9, Gilliamella apicola wkB1T; 10, Gilliamella apicola wkB7; 11, Gilliamella apis NO3T; 12, Gilliamella bombi LMG 29879T; 13, Gilliamella bombicola LMG 28359T; 14, Gilliamella intestini LMG 28358T; 15, Gilliamella mensalis LMG 29880T; 16, Ca. Schmidhempelia bombi Bimp; 17, Zophobihabitans entericus IPMB12T. COG categories: C, Energy production and conversion; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; H, Coenzyme transport and metabolism; J, Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, Transcription; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, Cell motility; O, Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; S, Function unknown; U, Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; V, Defence mechanisms; W, Extracellular structures. +, Present; –, absent.

COG category Genes putatively encoding 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
C Citrate lyase synthetase (CitC) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C Citrate lyase, alpha subunit (CitF) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C Citrate lyase beta subunit (CitE) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C Acyl-carrier protein (citrate lyase gamma subunit) (CitD) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C Na+/H+-dicarboxylate symporter (GltP) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
C FMN-dependent NADH-azoreductase (AzoR) + + + + + + +
C, O, P Nitrate reductase assembly protein (NarJ) + + + + + + + +
C, P Nitrate reductase gamma subunit (NarI) + + + + + + + +
C, P Nitrate reductase alpha subunit (NarG) + + + + + + + +
C, P Nitrate reductase beta subunit (NarY) + + + + + + + +
E Tryptophanase (TnaA) +
E Urease subunits (UreA-C) + + + +
H 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase (QueD) + + + + + + + + + +
J Stalled ribosome alternative rescue factor (ArfA) + + + + + +
K, N Negative regulator of flagellin synthesis (anti-sigma28 factor) (FlgM) + + + + + + + + +
M Penicillin V acylase or related amidase, Ntn superfamily + + + + + +
M, O, V Uncharacterized lipoprotein NlpE involved in copper resistance (CutF), Heat shock protein (HslJ) + + + + +
N Pilin (type one fimbrial protein) (FimA) + + + + + +
N Flagellar biosynthesis proteins (FlgA-N) + + + + + + + + +
N Flagellar biosynthesis proteins (FlhA and B) + + + + + + + + +
N Flagellar motor component (MotA) + + + + + + + + +
N Flagellar motor protein (MotB) + + + + + + + + + +
N, U Flagellar biosynthesis proteins FliA-G + + + + + + + + +
N, W Outer membrane usher protein (FimD/PapC) + + + + + + +
O Urease accessory proteins (UreE,F,H) + + + +
P Nitrous oxide reductase accessory protein, contains tandem CASH domains (NosD) +
P Cation transport regulator (ChaB) + + + + + + + + + +
P Zinc transporter (ZupT) + + + + + + + +
P Alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) + + + + +
S Predicted periplasmic protein with OB-fold, BOF family (YdeI) + + + + + + +
V Chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase (CatA) +
w P pilus assembly protein, chaperone (FimC/PapD) + + + + + + +

Physiology and biochemical characteristics

Cells of lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT were generally rod-shaped, but appeared more coccoid in certain contexts (Fig. 3). lpD01T commonly measured ~1.6 µm long and ~0.5 wide. Cells of lpD02T commonly measured ~2.0 µm long and ~0.3 µm wide. lpD03 and lpD04T commonly measured ~1.3 µm long and ~0.5 µm wide. Some cells of lpD03 and lpD04T grown in CB displayed long filamentous morphologies, similar to observations of O. hercynius CN3T made by Volkmann et al. (Fig. S4). BiBT commonly measured ~0.8 µm long and ~0.5 µm wide when grown on HIAb but appeared noticeably longer when grown in CB at a common measurement of ~1.5 µm long.

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of (a), lpD01T; (b), lpD02T; (c), lpD03; (d), lpD04T; and (e), BiBT grown for 2 days at 30 °C. Scale bar=1.0 µm.

Fig. 3.

Optimal growth conditions are summarized in Table 3. In liquid culture, growth was observed for all strains in all tested media except for MB, and very poor growth was observed for all strains in M9 minimal media (OD600 <0.001, slightly turbid wells). Summarized results from growth experiments indicated lpD01T grew best in BHI, CB, FAB, Insectagro, and 2X YTD, moderately in LB, and poorly in LIB, TB, and TSB. lpD02T grew best in BHI, CB, and 2X YTD, moderately in FAB and Insectagro, and poorly in LB, LIB, TB, and TSB. lpD03T grew best in BHI, CB, and 2X YTD, moderately in FAB, Insectagro, LIB, TB, and TSB, and poorly in LB. lpD04T grew best in BHI, CB, and 2X YTD, and moderately in FAB, Insectagro, LB, LIB, TB, and TSB. BiBT grew best in BHI, CB, and 2X YTD, moderately in Insectagro, LB, and TSB, and poorly in FAB, LIB, and TB. Optimal growth was observed on HIAb and Columbia agar +5% v/v defibrinated sheep’s blood (CAb) for all of the presently-described strains, and all five strains grew moderately when blood was omitted from HIA and Columbia agar. lpD01T grew moderately on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar, LB agar, and TSA, and poorly on BHI agar. lpD02T grew poorly on TSA and very poorly on MH, HIA, and LB. lpD03 grew moderately on TSA and BHI and poorly on LB and MH. lpD04 grew poorly on MH, LB, and BHI, and very poorly on TSA. BiBT grew moderately on MH, LB, BHI, and TSA. Strains lpD01T, lpD02T, and lpD03 were capable of growth between 10–35 °C, lpD04T was capable of growth between 10–30 °C, and BiBT was capable of growth between 10–40 °C. The optimal temperature range was 25–30 °C for lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and lpD04T and 25–35 °C for BiBT. All five strains grew well in atmospheric O2 and 5% CO2 incubators, but less optimally under anaerobic conditions. Differences in growth with or without agitation were negligible for lpD01T and BiBT, lpD02T grew optimally when grown without agitation regardless of the O2 concentration, and strains lpD03, and lpD04T grew optimally when shaken at 100 r.p.m. with a slight preference for atmospheric O2. Strains lpD01T and lpD03T grew between 0.0–3.0% w/v NaCl, but lpD01T grew optimally at 0.5–2.5% NaCl, and lpD03 grew optimally at 0.5–1.0% NaCl. Strains lpD02T and lpD04T grew between 0.0–2.5% NaCl, but optimally between 0.5–1.0% NaCl. BiBT grew between 0.0–≥3.5% NaCl, but optimally between 0.0–3.0% NaCl. lpD01T grew between pH 5.5–8.5 but optimally at 6.5–7.5 in BHI and between pH ≤6.0–8.5 but optimally between 7.5–8.5 in CB. lpD02T grew between pH 6.0–9.0 but optimally at 7.0–8.5 in BHI and between pH ≤6.0–8.5 but optimally at 7.5–8.5 in CB. lpD03 grew between pH 6.0–8.5 but optimally at 7.0–8.5 in BHI and between pH ≤6.0–8.5 but optimally at 7.5–8.5 in CB. lpD04T grew between pH 5.5–8.0 but optimally at 7.0–7.5 in BHI and between pH ≤6.0–8.5 but optimally at 7.5–8.5 in CB. BiBT grew between pH 5.0–9.5 but optimally at 6.0–6.5 in BHI and between pH ≤6.0–≥9.0 but optimally at 6.5–7.5 in CB.

Table 3. Optimal growth conditions for strains lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT. NaCl range is based on summarized results from experiments using BHI and 2X YTD broths.

Strains: 1, lpD01T; 2, lpD02T; 3, lpD03; 4, lpD04T; 5, BiBT. np=no preference was observed between tested conditions.

Optimal condition 1 2 3 4 5
Temperature (°C) 25–30 25–30 25–30 25–30 25–35
Shaking np No Yes Yes np
pH (BHI) 6.5–7.5 7.0–8.5 7.0–8.5 7.0–7.5 6.0–6.5
pH (CB) 7.5–8.5 7.5–8.5 7.5–8.5 7.5–8.5 6.5–7.5
NaCl (%) 0.5–2.5 0.5–1.0 0.5–1.0 0.5–1.0 0.0–3.0
Agar HIAb/CAb HIAb/CAb HIAb/CAb HIAb/CAb HIAb/CAb
Broth BHI/CB/FAB/2X YTD BHI/CB/2X YTD BHI/CB/2X YTD BHI/CB/2X YTD BHI/CB/2X YTD

Glycerol stocks or lyophilized cultures are both acceptable forms of cryopreservation for these strains. The strains remained viable following lyophilization in ATCC Medium 9520 (10% w/v BSA and 20% w/v sucrose) and storage for 72 h at room temperature. The revived lyophilized cultures of lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and BiBT contained ~107 CFU ml−1, whereas lpD04T retained a viability of ~106 CFU ml−1.

Results from motility assays suggest that the presently-described strains are motile, but we cannot confidently determine their precise method of motility. Initially, after 5 days of incubating the motility agar assay at 30 °C, results indicated a lack of motility due to a lack of diffused growth outside the stab line. However, we observed considerable diffusion approximately 1 week later, indicating that these strains are potentially motile. A repeat of this experiment yielded the same results. In subsequent experiments using semisolid agar a wide zone of diffuse growth was not observed for lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT compared to E. coli ATCC 25922; however, a multi-ring-like, star-shaped colony morphology with a transparent perimeter formed after approximately 2–4 days. This transparent ring around the site of inoculation measured approximately 2.0 cm in diameter for BiBT and 1.5 cm for lpD01T, noticeably larger than those observed for lpD02T, lpD03, and lpD04T, which were ~0.6 cm in diameter. For twitching motility assays wide, star-shaped surface colonies and interstitial colonies, both with a highly asymmetrical morphology, were observed for all of the presently-described strains. These results were similar to those observed for O. hercynius CN3T, concluded to be motile by an undetermined method by Volkmann et al. [6].

lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and BiBT did not exhibit noticeable biofilm formation under tested conditions; however, a ‘mesh-like’ substrate was observed in multiple samples, including lpD03, during scanning electron microscopic analysis (Fig. 3).

A summary of biochemical characteristics is available in Table 4. Strains lpD03 and lpD04T were oxidase-positive, and strains lpD01T, lpD02T, and BiBT were delayed oxidase-positive. All strains were positive for catalase activity. All of the presently-described strains except for lpD02 exhibited d-glucose and d-mannose fermentation in assays performed using the Microgen GN ID-A kit. lpD01T, lpD03, and lpD04T exhibited urease activity, which correlated perfectly with the presence of urease genes in urease-positive organisms and absence in urease-negative ones. All other Microgen GN ID-A test results were negative. Interestingly, the presently-described organisms encode citrate lyases and nitrate reductases, indicating the potential for relevant biochemical activities, though they were not observed using this testing method. Results from TSI slant cultures indicated all strains were positive for glucose and lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, and tests for lpD03 and lpD04T indicated the possible production of gas based on observed bubbles and cracks in the agar. The conflicting glucose fermentation results for lpD02T are possibly due to an incompatibility of this strain with the Microgen GN ID-A microwell contents. lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT did not exhibit DNase activity.

Table 4. Differential biochemical characteristics of the five newly isolated strains and close relatives in the family Orbaceae.

Strains: 1, lpD01T; 2, lpD02T; 3, lpD03; 4, lpD04T; 5, BiBT; 6, Frischella japonica Ac13T; 7, Frischella perrara PEB0191T; 8, Gilliamella apicola wkB1T; 9, Gilliamella apis NO3T; 10, Gilliamella bombi LMG 29879T; 11, Gilliamella bombicola LMG 28359T; 12, Gilliamella intestini LMG 28358T; 13, Gilliamella mensalis LMG 29880T; 14, Orbus hercynius CN3T; 15, Orbus sasakiae C7T; 16, Zophobihabitans entericus IPMB12T. +, Positive; d+, delayed positive; –, negative; w, weakly positive; v, variable; nd, no data.

Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Acetoin production nd nd nd + nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
Catalase + + + + + + + + + +
Citrate utilization nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd +
Glucose fermentation + + + + + + v v + + + +
Mannitol fermentation + + + + + nd nd nd nd nd nd + +
Xylose fermentation nd + nd nd nd nd nd nd nd + nd
DNAse nd nd nd nd nd nd
Indole production nd nd nd nd +
Lactose and/or sucrose fermentation + + + + + + nd + nd nd + +
Lysine decarboxylase + nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
Nitrate reductase nd + + +
β-Galactosidase + + + + nd
Ornithine decarboxylase nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd +
Oxidase d+ d+ + + d+ + +
Tryptophan deaminase nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
Urease + + + +

Strain lpD04T exhibited the following MIC: >800 µg ml−1 carbenicillin, 6.25 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol, 25 µg ml−1 kanamycin, 50 µg ml−1 spectinomycin, and 12.5 µg ml−1 tetracycline. MIC for lpD01T, lpD02T, lpD03, and BiBT were previously reported in Elston et al. [26]. The summarized MIC results are available in Table S3.

Strain lpD04T was successfully genetically engineered to express Pathfinder plasmids pSL1 and pSL1-GFP [26] via conjugation.

Chemotaxonomy

The major fatty acids (>10%) for lpD01T were summed feature 8, C16 : 0, summed feature 3, and C14 : 0. Major fatty acids for lpD02T, lpD03, and BiBT were summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c), C16 : 0, and summed feature 3 (C16 : 1 ω6c and/or C16 : 1 ω7c). Major fatty acids for lpD04T were summed feature 8 and C16 : 0. A comparison with 11 previously-described Orbaceae shows that all currently-described strains share the same major fatty acids, summed feature 8 and C16 : 0, and differ notably in compositions of C12 : 0, C14 : 0, summed feature 2 (C16 : 0 isomer I and/or C14 : 0 3OH), summed feature 3, C18 : 0, and/or C18 : 1 ω9c (Table S4).

The major respiratory quinone for lpD01T was ubiquinone 8 (Q-8; 99.3%), and trace amounts of ubiquinone 9 were detected (0.7%).

Discussion

Isolation and characterization of the presently-described strains expands the repertoire of culturable bacteria naturally associated with insects. Results from phylogenetic and genomic analyses suggest that strain lpD01T belongs to a novel genus, Utexia, and strains lpD02T, lpD03, lpD04T, and BiBT belongs to novel species in the genus Orbus. We propose the names Utexia brackfieldae gen. nov., sp. nov. lpD01T, Orbus sturtevantii sp. nov. lpD02T, Orbus wheelerorum sp. nov. lpD04T, and Orbus mooreae sp. nov. BiBT. These bacteria are amenable to genetic engineering and capable of colonizing lab-reared D. melanogaster [26] and are thus promising subjects for investigation of host-microbe interactions in this model organism. In conclusion, this description enriches our understanding of insect microbiota and presents a valuable resource for fine-scale exploration of host-microbe dynamics within the controlled environment of lab-reared D. melanogaster.

Description of Utexia gen. nov.

Utexia brackfieldae (U.tex’i.a. N.L. fem. n. Utexia, arbitrary name formed from the contraction of The University of Texas at Austin, where descriptive studies of this taxon were performed).

Cells are mesophilic, Gram-negative rods. Optimal growth conditions are reached under atmospheric O2 conditions, but growth is also observed in anaerobic conditions and 5% CO2. The predominant respiratory quinone is Q-8. The major fatty acids are cis-vaccenic acid (summed feature 8; C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c) and palmitic acid (C16 : 0). Based on 16S rRNA gene and single-copy ortholog phylogenetic analysis, the genus is most closely related to Ca. Schmidhempelia and Zophobihabitans. The type species of the genus is Utexia brackfieldae.

Description of Utexia brackfieldae sp. nov.

Utexia brackfieldae (brack.fiel’dae N.L. gen. n. brackfieldae, arbitrary epithet formed from a contraction of Brackenridge Field Laboratory, the research station where the fly from which this taxon was first isolated was caught).

In addition to those given in the genus description, Utexia brackfieldae exhibits the following characteristics. Strains grow optimally on blood agar, but are capable of growth on TSA, HIA, LBA, 2X YTD agar, Columbia, and DNase agar. They form smooth, round, off-white colonies with a transparent perimeter approximately 4 mm in diameter or smaller after 3 days of incubation at 30 °C. Strains grow between 10–35 °C, but optimally at 25–30 °C. In BHI, the growth range is pH 5.5–8.5 (optimal range 6.5–7.5), and in CB, the growth range is pH ≤6.0–8.5 (optimal range 7.5–8.5). In 2X YTD broth, the growth range is 0.0–3.0% w/v NaCl (optimal range 0.5–2.5%). Cells are approximately 1.6 by 0.5 µm. Cultures were delayed-positive for oxidase, and positive for glucose/dextrose fermentation, mannitol fermentation, lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, urease, and catalase. They were negative for acetoin production, citrate utilization, nitrate reductase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, hydrogen sulphide, xylose fermentation, β-galactosidase, indole production, tryptophan deaminase, and DNAse activity. The main constituent fatty acids are cis-vaccenic acid (36.4%, C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c) and palmitic acid (35.1%, C16 : 0).

The type strain is lpD01T (=NCIMB 15517T =ATCC TSD-399T) isolated from a wild-caught Neogriphoneura sordida in Austin, Texas, USA. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence are OR490959 and CP133959, respectively. The genome assembly accession number and name are GCA_036251705.1 and ASM3625170v1, respectively.

Description of Orbus sturtevantii sp. nov.

Orbus sturtevantii (stur.te.van’ti.i. N. L. gen. n. sturtevantii, named after Alfred Henry Sturtevant, American fly geneticist, professor, and describer of Drosophila cardini, the fly species from which this bacterium was isolated).

In addition to those given in the genus description, O. sturtevantii exhibits the following characteristics. Strains grow optimally on blood agar, but are capable of growth on TSA, HIA, LBA, 2X YTD agar, Columbia, and DNase agar. They form smooth, round, off-white colonies with a transparent perimeter approximately 3 mm in diameter or smaller after 5 days of incubation at 30 °C. Strains grow between 10–35 °C, but optimally at 25–30 °C. In BHI, the growth range is pH 6.0–9.0 (optimal range 7.0–8.5), and in CB, the growth range is pH ≤6.0–8.5 (optimal range 7.5–8.5). In 2X YTD broth, the growth range is 0.0–2.5% w/v NaCl (optimal range 0.5–1.0%). Cells are approximately 2.0 µm by 0.3 µm. Cultures were delayed-positive for oxidase, and positive for glucose/dextrose fermentation, mannitol fermentation, lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, urease, and catalase. They were negative for nitrate reductase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, hydrogen sulphide, xylose fermentation, ONPG hydrolysis, indole production, acetoin, citrate utilization, tryptophan deaminase, and DNAse activity. The main constituent fatty acids are palmitic acid (C16 : 0) and cis-vaccenic acid (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c).

The type strain is lpD02T (=NCIMB 15518T =ATCC TSD-400T) isolated from wild-caught Drosophila cardini in Austin, Texas, USA. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence are OR490960 and CP133960-CP133961, respectively. The genome assembly accession number and name are GCA_036251875.1 and ASM3625187v1, respectively.

Description of Orbus wheelerorum sp. nov.

Orbus wheelerorum (whee.le.ro’rum. N.L. gen. pl. n. wheelerorum, ‘of Wheelers,’ named after William Morton Wheeler and Marshall R. Wheeler, American biologists, naturalists, and professors who performed research on insects at the University of Texas at Austin, USA).

In addition to those given in the genus description, O. wheelerorum exhibits the following characteristics. Strains grow optimally on blood agar, but are also capable of growth on TSA, HIA, LBA, 2X YTD agar, Columbia, and DNase agar. They form smooth, round, off-white colonies with a transparent perimeter approximately 2.5 mm in diameter or smaller after 3 days of incubation at 30 °C. Strains grow between 10–30 °C for lpD04T (10–35 °C for lpD03), but optimally at 25–30 °C. For lpD04T the growth range is pH 5.5–8.0 (optimal range 7.0–7.5) in BHI, and pH ≤6.0–8.5 (optimal range 7.5–8.5) in CB. In 2X YTD broth, the growth range is 0.0–2.0% w/v NaCl for type strain lpD04T (optimal range 0.5–1.0%). Cells are approximately 1.3 µm by 0.5 µm (Fig. 3). Strains are positive for oxidase, glucose/dextrose fermentation, mannitol fermentation, lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, urease, and catalase, are negative for nitrate reductase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, hydrogen sulphide, xylose fermentation, ONPG hydrolysis, indole production, acetoin, citrate utilization, tryptophan deaminase, and DNAse activity. The main constituent fatty acids are cis-vaccenic acid (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c) and palmitic acid (C16 : 0).

The type strain is lpD04T (=NCIMB 15520T =ATCC TSD-401T) isolated from a wild-caught male Drosophila melanogaster in Austin, Texas, USA. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence of lpD04T are OR490962 and CP133967, respectively. The genome assembly accession number and name are GCA_036251935.1 and ASM3625193v1, respectively. Another strain of this species, lpD03 (=NCIMB 15519=ATCC BAA-3339), was isolated from a wild-caught Drosophila meridiana in Austin, Texas, USA. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence of lpD03 are OR490961 and CP133962-CP133966, respectively. The genome assembly accession number and name are GCA_036326945.1 and ASM3632694v1, respectively.

Description of Orbus mooreae sp. nov.

Orbus mooreae (moo’re.ae. N.L. gen. n. mooreae, named after Ruth Ella Moore, microbiologist, professor, and the first Black American woman to receive a PhD in the Natural Sciences [74]).

In addition to those given in the genus description, O. mooreae exhibits the following characteristics. Strains grow optimally on blood agar, but are capable of growth on TSA, HIA, LBA, 2X YTD agar, Columbia, and DNase agar. They form smooth, round, off-white colonies with a transparent perimeter approximately 3.5 mm in diameter or smaller after 3 days of incubation at 30 °C. Strains grow between 10–40 °C, but optimally at 25–35 °C. In BHI, the growth range is pH 5.0–9.5 (optimal range 6.0–6.5), and in CB, the growth range is pH ≤6.0-≥9.0 (optimal range 6.5–7.5). In 2X YTD broth, the growth range is 0–≥3.5 % w/v NaCl, with an optimal range of 0.0–3.0%. Cells are approximately 0.8 µm by 0.5 µm on HIAb, and 1.5 µm long in CB. Cultures were delayed-positive for oxidase, and positive for lysine decarboxylase, glucose/dextrose fermentation, mannitol fermentation, lactose and/or sucrose fermentation, β-galactosidase, and catalase. They were negative for nitrate reductase, ornithine decarboxylase, hydrogen sulphide, xylose fermentation, indole production, urease, acetoin, citrate utilization, tryptophan deaminase, and DNAse activity. The main constituent fatty acids are cis-vaccenic acid (45.8%, C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c) and palmitic acid (36.6%, C16 : 0).

The type strain is BiBT (=NCIMB 15516T =ATCC TSD-402T) isolated from a wild-caught Drosophila sp. in Austin, Texas, USA. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence are OR490958 and CP133958, respectively. The genome assembly accession number and name are GCA_036251205.1 and ASM3625120v1, respectively.

supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006516

Acknowledgements

We thank Larry Gilbert for his input regarding names, and Aharon Oren for his guidance on nomenclature. Thank you to Despoina Mavridou for the use of her lyophilizer and relevant guidance. Microscopy was performed at the Centre for Biomedical Research Support Microscopy and Imaging Facility at UT Austin (RRID:SCR_021756). We thank Michelle Mikesh, Gudrun Holland, and Wilharm Gottfried for their guidance on SEM. We thank Jo-anne C. Holley and Alan E. Silva Cerqueira for assisting with EM photography. We thank Patrick O’Grady for his assistance with morphological identification of flies. We thank Yiyuan Li and Olivia Smith for their assistance with R.

Abbreviations

AAI

average amino acid identity

ANI

average nucleotide identity

ANIb

average nucleotide identity based on BLASTN+ alignments

BHI

brain heart infusion

BLAST

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

BOLD

Barcode of Life Data System

CAb

Columbia agar + 5% v/v defibrinated sheep's blood

CB

Columbia broth

CFU

colony-forming unit

COG

Cluster of Orthologous Group of proteins

COI

cytochrome oxidase I

COII

cytochrome oxidase II

FAB

fastidious anaerobe broth

GGDC

Leibniz Institute DSMZ Genome to Genome Distance Calculator

GSAF

The University of Texas at Austin Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility

HIA

heart infusion agar

HIAb

heart infusion agar + 5% v/v defibrinated sheep's blood

HMDS

hexamethyldisilazane

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KO

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes ortholog

LB

lysogeny broth or Luria-Bertani

LIB

liver infusion broth

MB

marine broth

MH

Mueller-Hinton

MSH

mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin pili

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

ONT

Oxford Nanopore Technologies

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

TB

tryptose broth

TI

tetranucleotide identity

TSB

trypticase soy broth

TSI

triple sugar iron

TTC

2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride

YT

yeast extract tryptone

YTD

yeast extract tryptone + 0.3% w/v dextrose

Footnotes

Funding: This research was supported by funding provided by the U.S. Army Research Office (W911NF-20-1-0195) and by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R35GM131738).

Accession No: Proposed Name: Utexia brackfieldae, Strain: lpD01, 16S rRNA: OR490959, GenBank Sequence Accession(s): CP133959, Assembly Accession: GCA_036251705.1, Assembly Name: ASM3625170v1. Proposed Name: Orbus sturtevantii, Strain: lpD02, 16S rRNA: OR490960, GenBank Sequence Accession(s): CP133960-CP133961, Assembly Accession: GCA_036251875.1, Assembly Name: ASM3625187v1. Proposed Name: Orbus wheelerorum, Strain: lpD03, 16S rRNA: OR490961, GenBank Sequence Accession(s): CP133962-CP133966, Assembly Accession: GCA_036326945.1, Assembly Name: ASM3632694v1. Proposed Name: Orbus wheelerorum, Strain: lpD04, 16S rRNA: OR490962, GenBank Sequence Accession(s): CP133967, Assembly Accession: GCA_036251935.1, Assembly Name: ASM3625193v1. Proposed Name: Orbus mooreae, Strain: BiB, 16S rRNA OR490958, GenBank Sequence Accession(s): CP133958, Assembly Accession: GCA_036251205.1, Assembly Name: ASM3625120v1. BioProject Accession Number: PRJNA1009822.

Contributor Information

Laila E. Phillips, Email: lphillips@utexas.edu.

Kathleen L. Sotelo, Email: ksot6127@utexas.edu.

Nancy A. Moran, Email: nancy.moran@austin.utexas.edu.

References

  • 1.Ludington WB, Ja WW. Drosophila as a model for the gut microbiome. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martinson VG, Douglas AE, Jaenike J.Community structure of the gut microbiota in sympatric species of wild Drosophila .Ecol Lett 201720629–639. 10.1111/ele.12761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martinson VG, Carpinteyro-Ponce J, Moran NA, Markow TA. A distinctive and host-restricted gut microbiota in populations of a cactophilic Drosophila species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e01551-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01551-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Corby-Harris V, Pontaroli AC, Shimkets LJ, Bennetzen JL, Habel KE, et al. Geographical distribution and diversity of bacteria associated with natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3470–3479. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02120-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chandler JA, Lang JM, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Kopp A. Bacterial communities of diverse Drosophila species: ecological context of a host-microbe model system. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Volkmann M, Skiebe E, Kerrinnes T, Faber F, Lepka D, et al. Orbus hercynius gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from faeces of wild boar, is most closely related to members of the orders ‘Enterobacteriales’ and Pasteurellales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:2601–2605. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.019026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kwong WK, Moran NA. Cultivation and characterization of the gut symbionts of honey bees and bumble bees: description of Snodgrassella alvi gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Neisseriaceae of the Betaproteobacteria, and Gilliamella apicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of Orbaceae fam. nov., Orbales ord. nov., a sister taxon to the order ‘Enterobacteriales’ of the Gammaproteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:2008–2018. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.044875-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwong WK, Engel P, Koch H, Moran NA. Genomics and host specialization of honey bee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:11509–11514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405838111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwong WK, Moran NA. Evolution of host specialization in gut microbes: the bee gut as a model. Gut Microbes. 2015;6:214–220. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1047129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kwong WK, Moran NA. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:374–384. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zheng H, Nishida A, Kwong WK, Koch H, Engel P, et al. Metabolism of toxic sugars by strains of the bee gut symbiont Gilliamella apicola. mBio. 2016;7:1–9. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01326-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leonard SP, Perutka J, Powell JE, Geng P, Richhart DD, et al. Genetic engineering of bee gut microbiome bacteria with a toolkit for modular assembly of broad-host-range plasmids. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:1279–1290. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim JY, Lee J, Shin NR, Yun JH, Whon TW, et al. Orbus sasakiae sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the gut of the butterfly Sasakia charonda, and emended description of the genus Orbus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1766–1770. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.041871-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Engel P, Kwong WK, Moran NA. Frischella perrara gen. nov., sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium isolated from the gut of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:3646–3651. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.049569-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Praet J, Cnockaert M, Meeus I, Smagghe G, Vandamme P. Gilliamella intestini sp. nov., Gilliamella bombicola sp. nov., Gilliamella bombi sp. nov. and Gilliamella mensalis sp. nov.: four novel Gilliamella species isolated from the bumblebee gut. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2017;40:199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ludvigsen J, Porcellato D, Amdam GV, Rudi K. Addressing the diversity of the honeybee gut symbiont Gilliamella: description of Gilliamella apis sp. nov., isolated from the gut of honeybees (Apis mellifera) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:1762–1770. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolter LA, Suenami S, Miyazaki R. Frischella japonica sp. nov., an anaerobic member of the Orbales in the Gammaproteobacteria, isolated from the gut of the eastern honey bee, Apis cerana japonica Fabricius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuo CH, Huang PY, Sheu SY, Sheu DS, Jheng LC, et al. Zophobihabitans entericus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Orbaceae isolated from the gut of a superworm Zophobas morio. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5607–5612. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Markow TA, O’Grady PM. Drosophila: A Guide to Species Identification and Use. Amsterdam ; Boston: Elsevier/AP; 2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu H, Beckenbach AT. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1992;1:41–52. doi: 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90034-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data system. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:355–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2461–2470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elston KM, Phillips LE, Leonard SP, Young E, Holley J-AC, et al. The Pathfinder plasmid toolkit for genetically engineering newly isolated bacteria enables the study of Drosophila-colonizing Orbaceae. ISME Commun. 2023;3:49. doi: 10.1038/s43705-023-00255-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fukatsu T, Nikoh N. Two intracellular symbiotic bacteria from the mulberry psyllid Anomoneura mori (Insecta, Homoptera) Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3599–3606. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.10.3599-3606.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seemann T. Barrnap: rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. (0.9) 2018.
  • 29.Nawrocki EP. Washington University in Saint Louis, School of Medicine; 2009. Structural RNA Homology Search and Alignment using Covariance Models. Ph.D. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar S, Stecher G, Peterson D, Tamura K. MEGA-CC: computing core of molecular evolutionary genetics analysis program for automated and iterative data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2685–2686. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol. 2019;20:129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3:e000132. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008;9:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–6. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol. 2020;6:3–6. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00834-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods. 2016;8:12–24. doi: 10.1039/C5AY02550H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints. 2016 doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900. [DOI]
  • 49.Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20:238. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Steenwyk JL, Buida TJ, III, Li Y, Shen X-X, Rokas A. ClipKIT: a multiple sequence alignment-trimming algorithm for accurate phylogenomic inference. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:1–17. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.08.140384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1307–1320. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yang Z. A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1995;139:993–1005. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Soubrier J, Steel M, Lee MSY, Der Sarkissian C, Guindon S, et al. The influence of rate heterogeneity among sites on the time dependence of molecular rates. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:3345–3358. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abby SS, Rocha EPC. The non-flagellar type III secretion system evolved from the bacterial flagellum and diversified into host-cell adapted systems. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abby SS, Néron B, Ménager H, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. MacSyFinder: a program to mine genomes for molecular systems with an application to CRISPR-Cas systems. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Abby SS, Cury J, Guglielmini J, Néron B, Touchon M, et al. Identification of protein secretion systems in bacterial genomes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23080. doi: 10.1038/srep23080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Denise R, Abby SS, Rocha EPC. Diversification of the type IV filament superfamily into machines for adhesion, protein secretion, DNA uptake, and motility. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28:1947–1951. doi: 10.1002/pro.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D587–D592. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–637. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D261–D269. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Durbin R. Pfam: a comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins. 1997;28:405–420. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199707)28:3&#x0003c;405::AID-PROT10&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D412–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Turnbull L, Whitchurch CB.Motility Assay: Twitching MotilityFilloux A.Pseudomonas Methods and Protocols Methods in Molecular Biologyvol1149New York, NY: Humana; 2014 10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID, Inc; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Martinson VG, Magoc T, Koch H, Salzberg SL, Moran NA, et al. Genomic features of a bumble bee symbiont reflect its host environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:3793–3803. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00322-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pandey N, Cascella M. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Beta-lactam antibiotics. StatPearls. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tung TT, Jakobsen TH, Dao TT, Fuglsang AT, Givskov M, et al. Fusaric acid and analogues as Gram-negative bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;126:1011–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Warren W. Black Women Scientists in the United States. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006516

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES