Abstract
Rhopalocercous Cercaria duplicata von Baer, 1827 develops in an intermediate host, the unionid bivalve Anodonta anatina (L.), but its adult form has been unknown. We examined eight fish species occurring in the presence of a highly infested population of A. anatina in the Zesławice reservoir (S Poland). Gravid Phyllodistomum specimens were obtained from the ureters of ide, Leuciscus idus (L.) and common rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.). One of the rudd specimens was doubly infected, a trematode was also found in the urinary bladder. In addition, a gravid Phyllodistomum specimen was found in the ureter of a tench Tinca tinca (L.), caught in Lake Ilmėdas (Lithuania). In order to clarify the phylogenetic position of larval and adult gorgoderids and to establish their life cycle, ITS2 and 28S rDNA sequences were analysed. The analysis showed that adult Phyllodistomum specimens located in the ureters are conspecific with C. duplicata. The trematode found in the urinary bladder of S. erythrophthalmus was P. folium (Olfers, 1816). It is suggested that adult stages of C. duplicata should be referred to as Phyllodistomum duplicatum n. comb. The intercaecal position of the uterus and the deeply-lobed ovary are the main features distinguishing it from other Phyllodistomum species. Host specificity and ecology are discussed.
Keywords: Fish parasite, Digenean trematode, Phyllodistomum, 28S rDNA, ITS2, Life cycle
Subject terms: Atmospheric dynamics, Hydrology
Introduction
Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899, a widespread genus of digeneans with a global distribution, comprises over 120 species, identified principally on the basis of morphological characters. New species are still being described using an integrative morphological and molecular approach1–12. GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) contains publicly available nucleotide sequences for somewhat more than 30 formally described Phyllodistomum species.
Considerable variation occurs in the life-cycles of Phyllodistomum species, which is related to the morphology and biology of their larval stages. One type of life-cycle known for Phyllodistomum spp. is that characterized by rhopalocercous cercariae (with a comparatively short, club-shaped tail but no stylet or pharynx) developing in sporocysts in the viscera of unionid bivalves. Rhopalocercous cercariae encyst soon after emergence from the bivalve host; the tail swells rapidly to form a spherical structure into which the cercarial body is quickly retracted, which, presumably, can then be directly eaten by the definitive host, a fish13,14.
The only known species with such a life cycle in Europe is Cercaria duplicata, discovered and described by von Baer15 probably somewhere in former Prussia (now Northeastern Poland, Kaliningrad Oblast and Western Lithuania). Molecular data based on 28S and ITS2 sequences and karyotype structure, 2n = 18, confirmed that C. duplicata was a member of Gorgoderinae16. Two genetic lineages were discovered in that study: 28S 1103 bp length and 5.8S-ITS2-28S 425 bp length sequences of C. duplicata from Finland differed by 4 bp and 1 bp, respectively, from cercariae collected in Lithuania, Ukraine and Russia. The results of published experimental studies on the life cycle are contradictory, because different species of adult trematodes have been identified after experimental fish infections with C. duplicata under controlled conditions17,18. Moreover, molecular studies have revealed no match between C. duplicata and any species of Phyllodistomum investigated in comparative studies, including adults found in the experimental infections9,19. Ultimately, the correct affiliation of larval specimens of C. duplicata and recognition of its complete life cycle remain unresolved questions.
Cercaria duplicata has been found most frequently in the duck mussel, Anodonta anatina (L.) (Bivalvia: Unionidae), which acts as the first intermediate host. Some publications have reported it from A. cygnea (L.) in Italy17, and Russia20 and also from A. cygnea, A. anatina and Unio sp. from Ukraine (Fig. 1.)21–23.
Fig. 1.

Distribution map of C. duplicata and its adult stage locations: white circles – C. duplicata identified by morphology (found in A. anatina), black circles – C. duplicata identified by morphology and subjected to molecular studies (found in A. anatina), circle with a letter “C” inside – C. duplicata identified by morphology (found in A. cygnea), circle with lines inside – C. duplicata identified by morphology (found in Unio sp.), white triangles – adult stage distinguished with molecular characters (found in fish host). The base of the map: Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area projection; 1:14 000 000 map scale; based on a modified World Bank dataset licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0
The prevalences of infection in previously studied populations of A. anatina were relatively low; for example, 5.4% in the River Slutch in Ukraine24 and 7% in Lake Võrtsjärv in Estonia25. Our previous helminthological studies of bivalves9,19 also revealed a low prevalence of C. duplicata. More than 100 individuals of A. anatina from each population were studied and the following data on the prevalence of infection were obtained (unpublished): 1.88% in Kaunas reservoir, Lithuania; 0.92 % in Lake Saraavesi, Finland; 0.76 % in the River Chesnava, Russia. In Poland, the prevalence of infection of different populations ranged from 0.2 to 8.6%25–27.
Although C. duplicata has been recorded in A. anatina in various water bodies of Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine and the European part of Russia (Fig.1)9,19,24,25,27,28, its host A. anatina has a wider geographical distribution that includes almost all parts of Europe and parts of Asia29,30. Moreover, identification of definitive hosts is potentially important in explaining the geographic range of this trematode species; for example, the presence of Phyllodistomum cercariae in A. anatina from the Amu-Daria Delta31 requires further detailed study, because it may be the first record of C. duplicata or of different rhopalocercous species of Phyllodistomum in Asia. Given the obvious knowledge gap and uncertainty surrounding this topic, there is a clear need to address these questions in order to aquire a better understanding of the species’ ecology and patterns of host-parasite coevolution. These studies may also be useful in evaluating the impact of C. duplicata on intermediate host populations, because in some cases, parthenogenetically reproducing larvae of digeneans fill a gonad of a mussel, eventually causing its castration and, in consequence, decreasing the reproductive capacity of mussel populations32,33.
Here, we present the results of a search for the adult stage of C. duplicata in natural definitive hosts in the Zesławice reservoir in Krakow, (S Poland), which is inhabited by a population of A. anatina heavily infected with C. duplicata (according to our unpublished data). This study also provides information on the definitive host from another location, Lake Ilmėdas in Lithuania.
Results
Helminthological studies of the population of A. anatina living in the Zesławice reservoir, conducted in 2021 and 2022, revealed a varying prevalence of C. duplicata infection: in 2021, the prevalence was 6.52% (n=42), while in 2022 it was 11.90 % (n=46). Samples of U. pictorum (n=35), were completely free of gorgoderids.
Infected bivalves had their gonads filled with sporocysts and did not produce their own gametes (Fig. 2): the parasite led to the castration of the mussel host.
Fig. 2.
Fresh specimens of A. anatina with: (A) dissected uninfected gonad, (B) dissected infected gonad full of sporocysts, scale bar 1 cm; (C) and (D) microphotographs of sporocysts, scale bar 500 µm, (E) Cercaria duplicata, scale bar 300 µm.
Nine mature Phyllodistomum sp. were obtained from the urinary system of four specimens of S. erythrophthalmus (prevalence 75%) and four worms were found in the ureters of two specimens of L. idus (prevalence 100%). All other fish collected at the same location on the same day were negative for gorgoderids. The partial sequences of 28S rDNA and ITS2 from adult and larval samples were analysed. One gravid specimen, identical to the genetic lineage of C. duplicata from Lithuania, Ukraine and Russia19, was retrieved from the ureter of T. tinca, caught in Lake Ilmėdas, Lithuania. The sequences of the adult Phyllodistomum sp. from ureters of common rudd and ide were identical to the sequences of C. duplicata from that study; the 28S analysis revealed no difference between those larval samples and C. duplicata from Lithuania, Ukraine and Russia. The ITS2 of C. duplicata from Poland is identical to C. duplicata from Finland and differs by 1bp from the ITS2 rDNA of samples collected in Lithuania, Ukraine and Russia. In one case of double infection, a specimen recovered from the urinary bladder of one common rudd was genetically identical to Phyllodistomum folium specimens collected in Norway, Ukraine and Russia in our previous studies19.
Phylogenetic analyses of ITS2 and 28S rDNA nucleotide sequences of Gorgoderinae were based on 368 and 797 positions in the final datasets, respectively. In the phylogenetic tree based on 28S rDNA, P. duplicatum formed a clade with the rhopalocercous cercaria from the unionid bivalves of North America, while Phyllodistomum species developing in Japanese unionids were phylogenetically more distant (Fig. 3). These results are consistent with the study by Gosho et al.12. The P. duplicatum clade appears to be sister to that of gorgoderids for which only cystocercous cercariae are known and the first intermediate hosts are exclusively species of Sphaeriidae.
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree of gorgoderid species based on the Maximum Likelihood analysis of partial sequences of the 28S nuclear rDNA gene, with notes about first intermediate host taxa. Bootstrap support values lower than 70% are not shown. GenBank accession numbers of the collapsed clades are provided in Table 1.
Other gorgoderids were clustered into two distinct clades (Fig. 3). One of these comprises exclusivelly marine Phyllodistomum species from the Australasian region, including two sequences of larvae collected from venerid bivalves. The other, most diverse clade comprises Pseudophyllodistomum and marine Xystretrum species together with freshwater Phyllodistomum with different cercaria types and a wide range of bivalvia species as intermediate hosts, including Dreissenidae, Sphaeriidae, Unionidae and Corbiculidae. The branch of P. cyprini developing in Japanese unionids is the longest and, like a branch of Phyllodistomum chauhani from India, lacks bootstrap support with other groups in this clade. Also, besides the highly supported subclades of Xystretrum and Pseudophyllodistomum, there are two highly supported subclades of Phyllodistomum species. One of them comprises six species with unknown first intermediate hosts from the Neotropical and Paleotropical regions; the other consists of European species P. pseudofolium and P. macrocotyle, which have macrocercous cercariae developing in the sphaeriid clam Pisidium amnicum and microcercous cercariae developing in Dreissena polymorpha, respectively.
Although there are significantly fewer data for ITS2 than for 28S, the topology of the ITS2 tree is identical to previously obtained molecular phylogenetic trees of gorgoderids, with the position of P. duplicatum being the same as in the 28S tree9.
Morphological description
Family Gorgoderidae Looss, 1899
Genus Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899
Phyllodistomum duplicatum (von Baer, 1827) n. comb.
Syn.Cercaria duplicata von Baer 1827
Type-host: Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.), (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae).
Other hosts: Leuciscus idus (L.) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae), Tinca tinca (L.) (Cypriniformes: Tincidae).
Type-locality: Zesławice reservoir, Krakow, Poland.
Site in host: Ureters.
Voucher material: EKOI-252PL EKOI -253PL, EKOI-226LT are deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Nature Research Centre, Lithuania.
Representative DNA sequences: 28S rDNA, PP061384 - PP061387, ITS1-ITS2 rDNA, PP082092 - PP082094, PP748525.
Description based on 4 gravid specimens; Fig. 4. Body elongate, lanceolate, 2400-3050 (2700) long, maximum width 690‒920 (800) at level of anterior testis; lateral margins smooth. Forebody 900‒1020 (950) long, representing 35% of total body length. Body length to width ratio 1:3.35. Oral sucker rounded, subterminal, 180‒225 × 150‒260 (200 × 210). Ventral sucker round or oval, approximately the same size as or slightly larger than oral sucker, 180‒240 × 190‒220 (210 × 220). Pharynx absent. Oesophagus straight, 190‒220 (200) long. Intestinal bifurcation closer to oral than ventral sucker. Caeca simple, wide, blind, extending close to posterior end.
Fig. 4.

Phyllodistomum duplicatum n. comb., ex. Scardinius erythrophthalmus: ventral view of adult specimen; os, oral sucker; c, caecum; gp, genital pore; vs, ventral sucker; vg, vitelline gland; o, ovary; at, anterior testis; pt, posterior testis; ev, excretory vesicle. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Gonads and vitelline masses located intercaecally, posterior to ventral sucker. Testes two, slightly lobed, oblique, in mid-body, not overlapping caeca; anterior testis 170‒300 × 110‒150 (230 × 130); posterior testis 160‒260 × 125‒180 (220 × 150). Seminal vesicle saccular (spherical), comparatively large 80‒85 × 80‒90 (84 × 82), dorsal to genital pore. Pars prostatica not observed. Genital pore median, close to anterior margin of ventral sucker.
Ovary irregular, lobed (3-4 lobes), dextral in all four specimens, slightly overlapping and ventral to vitellarium, 100‒145 × 95‒160 (120 × 135).
Vitelline masses two, strongly elongated in direction transverse to long axis of body, irregular, posterior to ventral sucker. Right vitelline mass 70‒95 × 120‒155 (85 × 145), left vitelline mass 60‒75 × 120‒160 (65 × 140).
Uterus extensively coiled, almost entirely intercaecal in hindbody. Eggs oval, 33‒40 × 20‒24 (35 × 21). Excretory vesicle tubular; anterior extent obscured by uterus in all specimens. Excretory pore terminal.
Remarks
Phyllodistomum duplicatum is only the second described species of the genus that has an intercaecal uterus. This condition is also characteristic of P. cyprini Feng et Wang, 1995, recovered from the ureters of Cyprinus carpio (L.) in Japan12, but the ovary of P. cyprini is smooth and oval. Moreover, these species are phylogenetically distant. All other valid Phyllodistomum species are characterized by the distribution of the uterus in inter- and extracaecal space.
Morphologically, Phyllodistomum duplicatum closely resembles P. macrocotyle (Lühe, 1909) Odhner, 1911 (syn. P. dogieli Pigulevsky, 1953). Both parasitize the same fish host species, i.e. S. erythrophthalmus and L. idus, and have been isolated from the ureters rather than the urinary bladder, but the two species are not closely related in molecularly based phylogenies. Phyllodistomum duplicatum can be differentiated from P. macrocotyle by its intercaecal uterus, the relatively larger seminal vesicle, and the more elongated vitelline masses; the oral sucker to ventral sucker size ratio varies in the descriptions of P. macrocotyle by different authors. In the description according to Pigulevsky34 and35, the ventral sucker is twice as large as the oral sucker. In the recent redescription of P. macrocotyle the suckers were about the same size9, as P. duplicatum suckers.
Phyllodistomum duplicatum has many morphological similarities to P. elongatum Nybelin, 1926: similar body shape, sucker sizes, genital pore near to ventral sucker margin, and lobed ovary. However, many reasonable doubts have arisen regarding the morphological descriptions of P. elongatum provided by different researchers. Specimens of different species were probably described under this name34,36, but the position of the uterus in all descriptions is both intra- and inter-caecal. Reports incorporating molecular data have shown that Phyllodistomum specimens, recovered from ureters of fish hosts and morphologically resembling P. elongatum, may be representatives of multiple species9,19. Due to the morphological plasticity of Phyllodistomum specimens located in ureters, they tend to have an elongated body shape and resemble ‘P. elongatum’. In our previous studies, P. elongatum-like trematodes isolated from the ureters of European cyprinid fish (Abramis bramae, S. erythrophthalmus, L. idus, R. rutilus) were identified by DNA analysis as P. macrocotyle or P. folium, suggesting that location in the fish excretory system leads to a similar elongated body shape and morphology9.
Discussion
Despite the increasing availability of molecular data, there is still confusion and difficulty in determining the taxonomy of the genus Phyllodistomum, particularly in relating morphological species to genetic lineages. Most species of trematodes are only known from their adult stage, while some well-known larval (asexual) trematodes have been described from their intermediate hosts and have never been associated with any adult. However, a species cannot be fully understood without knowledge of its life-cycle. Different approaches, including morphological matching and ecological evidence, experimental infections, and molecular matching, have been used in life cycle studies. Recent comparative molecular analysis has shown that inferences based on morphological similarities or ecological evidence are often incorrect, and that even experimental data can be contradictory6,19,37,38.
The host specificity of P. duplicatum differs for its adult and larval stages. According to our molecular studies, the larval stage of P. duplicatum is strictly host-specific to A. anatina (i.e. oioxeny also known in P. cyprini, P. macrocotyle and P. pseudofolium), while larval stages of other Phyllodistomum species exhibit much broader host specificity, reaching the genus or family level6. In view of the fact that in North America at least six different rhopalocercous gorgoderid cercariae with strict host specificity to the first intermediate host have been described13,14, the identity of C. duplicata reported from A. cygnea should be verified by molecular methods, because it may be another species of rhopalocercous Phyllodistomum in Europe.
In this study, three fish species were identified as definitive hosts of P. duplicatum, suggesting that the host range includes relatively closely-related species from the families Leuciscinae and Tincidae (stenoxeny). However, it is still unclear whether other fish species may be suitable definitive hosts. The host specificity patterns of P. duplicatum are identical to those of the morphologically similar P. macrocotyle.
Phenotypic plasticity poses challenges in species recognition as it can obscure species identity. Adult trematodes that grow in different hosts can exhibit intraspecific, host-induced variation in morphology6,39,40. The morphology of Phyllodistomum species depends not only on the fish host species but also on the site within the host, principally the ureters or urinary bladder41. Specimens obtained from the ureters of the fish host have an elongated form and thus are “P. elongatum – like”.
Urabe et al.2 described rhopalocercous gorgoderid cercaria found in the unionid mussel Nodularia douglasiae (now N. nipponensis (Martens, 1877)42) from the Yodo River in Japan, along with immature phyllodistomes collected from the ureters of the common carp, C. carpio, from the same water body. Comparative molecular analysis confirmed the conspecificity of the two developmental stages. Based on their general morphology, this species does not correspond to any other species previously described in freshwater fish from Japan. The morphology of the immature trematodes resembles that of P. elongatum recorded in Europe, but molecular and morphological studies of gravid trematodes from ureters of C. carpio have revealed that this species is P. cyprini12.
Our previous studies based on comparative sequence analysis showed that specimens of Phyllodistomum species recovered from the ureters and urinary bladder of S. erythrophthalmus represent two species, P. macrocotyle and P. folium, while Phyllodistomum from the ureters of L. idus proved to be P. macrocotyle9. It is likely that Phyllodistomum species typically have a location preference in the urinary system of their definitive hosts.
Our phylogenetic analysis does not fully support the suggestions that Gorgoderinae species associated with distinct intermediate host groups represent distinct main clades in the species tree43 or that the morphology of cercariae may be a more accurate indicator of the phylogenetic distinctions than the taxonomy of their molluscan hosts12. The present phylogenetic analyses confirm our previous observations6,9 that the morphological or biological features of adult forms, as well as cercariae, do not provide a reliable basis for recognizing distinct phylogenetic units in Gorgoderinae. Indeed, in the 28S tree at least two main clades of Gorgoderinae species characterized by a single type of cercariae are associated with distinct first intermediate host groups. The main clade including P. folium consists of species for which only cystocercous cercariae are known to develop only in sphaeriid bivalves. Another significant group consists of P. duplicatum and rhopalocercous gorgoderid cercaria from North America, which are associated exclusively with unionid mussels. But the most diverse major clade includes species with different cercaria morphologies and distinct pattern of first intermediate host identity (Fig. 3). Thus, the phylogenetically closely-related P. pseudofolium and P. macrocotyle have morphologically very different macrocercous and microcercous cercariae that develop in the phylogenetically distant bivalves Pisidium amnicum and Dreissena polymorpha. The rhopalocercous cercaria of P. cyprini developing in unionid bivalves from the Yodo River (Japan)2 is phylogenetically distant from P. duplicatum. Incidentally, Gosho et al.12 stated that Urabe et al.2 incorrectly assigned this cercaria to the rhopalocercous morphological group and that the morphology of cercariae resembles that of macrocercous cercariae, but no arguments were provided to support this decision. The rhopalocercous cercariae are characterized as follows: they are produced by sporocysts in the viscera of unionid bivalves; they have no stylet and only a short tail, and they use cystogenous cells surrounding the excretory bladder to encyst within their own tail soon after emergence from the bivalve13,14. The cercaria of P. cyprini meets all these morphological characteristics, but data regarding the metacercarial stage and its formation are not provided. Therefore, the assignment of P. cyprini cercaria to a group other than rhopalocerca cannot be accepted without further observations.
It is obvious that some phylogenetic groups of Gorgoderinae species are associated with distinct intermediate host groups and the morphology of cercariae, but these are not regularities common to all groups of phylogenetically closely-related Phyllodistomum species. It is worth noting that the first intermediate hosts are unknown for most Phylodistomum species, especially those of marine species, and no intermediate host is known for species from the Neotropical and Paleotropical regions.
Numerous populations of the unionids A. anatina and U. pictorum inhabit the Zesławice reservoir. Mussels were found along the whole surveyed shoreline (about 300 m along the west bank of the Zesławice II reservoir, which is about 13.5 % of its total shoreline length). Locally, the densities of both mussel species, co-occuring in equal measure, reached 10 specimens per 1 m2.
Dreissenid and sphaeriid bivalves were not recorded in this reservoir. The majority of S. erythrophthalmus and L. idus examined were infected with P. duplicatum, suggesting a high prevalence of infection in these definitive hosts in the wild (unfortunately, only a small number of these fish were studied). However, during more than ten years of molecular - helminthological studies of fish in Lithuania, P. duplicatum was detected only in T. tinca, while during this study not a single infected T. tinca was found in the Zesławice reservoir. The three fish species that act as definitive hosts, i.e. T. tinca, S. erythrophthalmus and L. idus, belong to the order Cypriniformes and have distinct characteristics in terms of biology and ecological preferences44,45. Given the different preferences for either benthic or benthopelagic activity, the definitive host range of P. duplicatum cannot be explained solely on the basis of fish feeding behaviour. Two of them, T. tinca and S. erythrophthalmus, prefer slow-moving or stagnant waters like ponds and lakes, whereas L. idus is typically found in flowing waters such as rivers and streams. Benthopelagic L. idus and S. erythrophthalmus, feed on plankton, various aquatic and terrestrial animals and plant material. Tinca tinca, a bottom feeder, preys mainly on molluscs and other benthic animals. There is also a noticeable difference in the type of waterbodies which held definite hosts inspected during the study: both L. idus and S. erythrophthalmus were caught in a small artificial water body that was very shallow and eutrophic, whereas T. tinca was caught in a large oligotrophic, natural, glacial lake. Both waterbodies are of the inflow-outflow type.
This study corroborates the strict specificity of P. duplicatum to its first intermediate host A. anatina and identifies three final host species from two different families of fish. Further research is needed to understand the range and host specificity, ecology, behaviour, and population dynamics of P. duplicatum in its intermediate and definitive hosts. Conducting research on larger fish populations with a focus on ecology could provide valuable insights into these matters.
Materials and methods
Research sites
The biological material was collected at two sites (Fig. 1). One of them, the Zesławice dam reservoir (50º 6' 31.475" N, 20º 1' 50.064" E), was created in 1987 by damming the valley of the River Dłubnia, ca 8 km from its confluence with the River Vistula; it is surrounded by the suburbs of Kraków in southern Poland. The research was conducted in the eastern part of the reservoir (area = 11.3 ha, water depth rarely > 2.0 m). The bottom substrate consists solely of a thick layer of silt, fine organic sediment and detritus, ca 15 to 30 cm deep in the littoral zone46,47. The water transparency varies during the year; it is mostly dark and murky, with significant amounts of suspended matter, so that visibility is limited; in September 2023, the Secchi disc visibility was no more than 30 cm, which suggests eutrophication.
The second site where research material was obtained was the natural, glacial Lake Ilmėdas in the Labanoras Regional Park, a protected area, in eastern Lithuania (55°15’39.7"N 25°33’44.8"E). The lake is 83.6 ha in area, with maximum and average depths of 17.5 and 6.6 m, respectively. The lake is situated in a glacial trough with a very winding shoreline and small islets in the western and central parts. The shores are mostly high and covered with forest, while in some places they are flat and swampy. On the other shores, there are meadows and cultivated fields. Ilmėdas is an inflow-outflow lake with a 17% water exchange rate; it belongs to the catchment area of the River Žeimena.
Mussel collection and examination
Two species of unionid mussels, Unio pictorum (L.) (painter’s mussel) and A. anatina (duck mussel) were identified in the Zesławice reservoir. To examine the presence of trematodes in the mussels’ gonads, 46 specimens of A. anatina were collected in January 2021, and 42 specimens of A. anatina in October 2022, when 35 specimens of the co-occurring U. pictorum were also collected.
The mussels were sampled close to the reservoir shore using bottom-scrapers (rakes with nets) and manually (through tactile means). The mussels were carefully placed in multiple 10-litre containers filled with fresh water and transported to the laboratory at the Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
In the laboratory, the mussels were stored in pails (the water was aerated) and examined for the presence of trematodes in their gonads. Syringe puncture and microscope examination were employed, following the method described by Brian and Aldridge48, utilizing a Leica S8 APO stereo microscope and a Phenix BMC100 light microscope at magnifications ranging from 40× to 400×. Heavily infected specimens were selected and dissected in order to obtain intra-molluscan stages for subsequent analysis.
Fish collection and manipulation
In October 2022, fish were caught in the littoral zone along a 300 m stretch of the shoreline using electrofishing techniques from an inflatable dinghy. An engine-powered EL62IIGI (Hans-Grassl) device, was used for this purpose. A maximum of four individuals per species were captured for subsequent dissection. To euthanise the fish, anaesthetics (MS-222, Sigma Aldrich) were administered through immersion in a buffered solution: a dosage of 250 mg/L to sedate the specimens and then 500 mg/L to euthanize them. Mortality was confirmed after 30 minutes by the onset of rigor mortis. The following species were analyzed: Cypriniformes: Abramis brama (L.) (3 specimens), Rutilus rutilus (L.) (2), Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.) (4), Leuciscus idus (L.) (2), Blicca bjoerkna (L.) (1), Tinca tinca (4); Perciformes: Perca fluviatilis (L.) (4), Sander lucioperca (L.) (1). After being euthanized, the fish were immediately transported to the laboratory at the Kraków University of Agriculture and stored in a cooler set at 3°C for 20 hours before dissection could take place on the following day. These storage conditions were sufficient to prevent the material from freezing and to maintain the viability of most of the trematodes present in the fish.
Live T. tinca were caught with a fishing rod in Lake Ilmėdas in August 2018 and were dissected the next day at the Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Adult stages of trematode collection
Adult gorgoderids were collected from naturally infected fish. The urinary bladder and ureters of the fish were isolated and placed in saline solution (0.65% NaCl). They were carefully examined under a stereomicroscope. Mature adult worms were recovered from the ureters and urinary bladder of common rudd S. erythrophthalmus, as well as from the ureters of ide L. idus and tench T. tinca. Specimens for molecular analysis were fixed in absolute ethanol and stored in a freezer.
Five gravid specimens of Phyllodistomum from the ureters of the fish were used for light microscopy examination and molecular analysis: one live specimen from T. tinca and two live and two fixed specimens from S. erythrophthalmus. One specimen of Phyllodistomum from L. idus was used for molecular analysis. To prepare permanent slides, the flukes were rinsed in saline solution, fixed by pipetting into near-boiling saline, and preserved in 70% ethanol. The specimens were stained with alum carmine, dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol, cleared in dimethyl phthalate and mounted in Canada balsam. All measurements are in micrometres (μm) and given as a range followed by the mean in parentheses.
Samples for the molecular analysis of rhopalocercous cercariae were obtained from three specimens of A. anatina collected at the Zesławice reservoir, at roughly the same time two days later.
The voucher specimens are deposited in the helminthological collection of P.B. Šivickis Laboratory of Parasitology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Molecular sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
Genomic DNA of adult specimens and larval trematodes was extracted from ethanol-fixed material according to the protocol of Stunžėnas16,49. Amplification and sequencing of the two rDNA markers, the nuclear internal transcribed spacers (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA) and the beginning of the large (28S) ribosomal subunit RNA coding regions, were performed following the protocol used in our previous studies16. A primer pair designed for Gorgoderidae species9, the forward primer GoJe-F (5′-CTTGCAATTGTTCCCCGTGA-3′) and the reverse primer GoJe-R (5′-CTGTTCACTCGCCGTTACTG-3′), were used to amplify part of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), the complete 5.8S rDNA and ITS2. A fragment at the 5′ end of the 28S rRNA gene was amplified using the forward primers Digl2 (5′-AAG CAT ATC ACT AAG CGG-3′) or ZX-1 (5′-ACC CGC TGA ATT TAA GCA TAT-3′)50 and the reverse primers L0 (5′-GCT ATC CTG AG (AG) GAA ACT TCG-3′)51 or 1500R (5′-GCT ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCG-3′)52,53. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were purified and sequenced by the Sanger sequencing method in both directions at Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) using PCR primers. Contiguous sequences were assembled using Sequencher 4.10.1 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA). Estimates of mean evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs within and between groups were calculated using the MEGA v.11.0.11 programme54. Newly generated 28S and ITS2 sequences from larval intramolluscan and adult stages were compared and identical, similar and related sequences for phylogenetic analyses were found by the “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool” (BLAST)55. Both the ITS2 and 28S datasets were aligned independently using ClustalW56 with an open gap penalty of 15 and a gap extension penalty of 6.66. The maximum likelihood (ML) trees were obtained using the general time reversible model with a gamma distribution rate (GTR + G) for both the ITS2 and the 28S gene datasets. The value for gamma and the number of invariant sites were estimated from the data. Parsimony analysis based on subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR) was used with default parsimony settings. Branch support was estimated by bootstrap analyses with 1000 pseudoreplicates. If two or more sequences belonged to one species, they were collapsed into one branch, except those newly obtained in this study. Furthermore, additional rDNA sequences of gorgoderid species and outgroup taxa were downloaded from GenBank and included in phylogenetic analysis (Table 1).
Table 1.
Species subjected to molecular phylogenetic analysis with information of their host, locality and GenBank accession numbers.
| Species | Host | Locality | GenBank IDa [Reference] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28S | 5.8S-ITS2-28S | |||
| Phyllodistomum angulatum | Sander lucioperca | River Chesnava, Russia | KJ740511, KJ74051219 | |
| P. angulatum | S. lucioperca | Rybinsk water reservoir on the Volga River, Russia | KX95773419 | |
| Phyllodistomum brevicaecum | Umbra limi | Brokenhead, Manitoba, Canada | KC76020757 | |
| Phyllodistomum brevicaecum | U. limi | Canada | HQ32500858 | |
| Phyllodistomum centropomi | Centropomus parallelus | Tlacotalpan, Veracruz, Mexico | KM6593844 | |
| Phyllodistomum chauhani | Channa punctatus | Uttar Pradesh, India | KX34407459 | |
| Phyllodistomum cribbi | Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis | Mexico | KT3767183 | |
| Phyllodistomum cyprini | Cyprinus carpio | Yodo River, Japan | LC77673012 | |
| Phyllodistomum duplicatum n. comb. (= C. duplicata) | Anodonta anatina | Zesławice Reservoir, Poland | PP061387 | PP082092 |
| P. duplicatum | Leuciscus idus | Zesławice Reservoir, Poland | PP061385 | PP082094 |
| P. duplicatum | Scardinius erythrophthalmus | Zesławice Reservoir, Poland | PP061386 | PP082093 |
| P. duplicatum | Tinca tinca | Lake Ilmėdas, Lithuania | PP061384 | PP748525 |
| P. duplicatum (= C. duplicata) | A. anatina | Lake Saravesi, Finland | KJ72951619 | KJ74049019 |
| P. duplicatum (= C. duplicata) | A. anatina | Kaunas water Reservoir, Lithuania | KJ72951519 | KJ74049219 |
| P. duplicatum (= C. duplicata) | A. anatina | River Sluch, Ukraine | KJ72951719 | KJ74048919 |
| P. duplicatum (= C. duplicata) | A. anatina | River Chesnava, Russia | KJ72951419 | KJ74049119 |
| Phyllodistomum folium | Esox lucius | River Ild, Russia | KJ72954219 | KJ74050019 |
| P. folium | Cottus gobio | River Neris, Lithuania | KJ72955019 | KJ74050719 |
| P. folium | Gasterosteus aculeatus | River Vilnelė, Lithuania | AY27770760 | AY27770560 |
| P. folium | Scardinius erythrophthalmus | Zesławice Reservoir, Poland | PP716808 | PP718688 |
| P. folium | Sphaerium corneum | River Hegga, Norway | KJ72955119 | KJ74049519 |
| P. folium | Pisidium supinum | River Ūla, Lithuania | KJ72954419 | KJ74049619 |
| Phyllodistomum hoggettae | Plectropomus leopardus |
Lizard Island, Queensland, Australia |
KF01319143 | KF01314843 |
| Phyllodistomum hyporhamphi | Hyporhamphus australis | Australia | KF01319043 | KF01315043 |
| Phyllodistomum inecoli | Heterandria bimaculata | Agua Bendita, Xico, Veracruz, Mexico | KC76019957 | |
| Phyllodistomum isabelae | Maskaheros regansis | Río Grande, Matías Romero, Oaxaca, Mexico | MW80432010 | |
| Phyllodistomum kanae | Hynobius retardatus | Pippu, Hokkaido, Japan | AB9798685 | |
| Phyllodistomum kupermani | Perca fluviatilis | Rybinsk water reservoir on the Volga River, Russia | MT875008, MT8750099 | MT875012, MT8750139 |
| Phyllodistomum lacustri | Noturus flavus | Canada | HQ32501058 | |
| Phyllodistomum macrocotyle | Dreissena polymorpha | Lake Vilkokšnis, Lithuania | KJ72951819 | KJ74051819 |
| P. macrocotyle (= P. folium sensu Sinitsin, 1905) | D. polymorpha | Lake Lepelskoe, Belarus | AY28882861 | AY28883161 |
| P. macrocotyle (= P. folium sensu Sinitsin, 1905) | D. polymorpha | Lake Lukomskoe, Belarus | AY28112761 | AF53301561 |
| P. macrocotyle | S. erythrophthalmus | Rybinsk water reservoir on the Volga River, Russia | MT8726649 | MT8750119 |
| Phyllodistomum magnificum | Tandanus tandanus | Moggill Creek, Queensland, Australia | KF01318943 | KF013153, KF01315643 |
| Phyllodistomum pacificum | Pantolabus radiatus | Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia | MG8455997 | MG8456017 |
| Phyllodistomum parasiluri | Silurus asotus | Japan | LC0025225 | |
| Phyllodistomum pseudofolium | Gymnocephalus cernuus | River Chesnava, Russia | KX9577326 | KY3078756 |
| P. pseudofolium | Pisidium amnicum | River Chesnava, Russia | KJ74051319 | |
| P. pseudofolium (= Phyllodistomum sp. Ginetzinskaya (1959)) | P. amnicum | Lithuania | AY28112660 | |
| Phyllodistomum romualdae | Archocentrus centrarchus | Finca el Espavel, San Carlos, Nicaragua | MW80431410 | |
| Phyllodistomum scotti | Rhamdia nicaraguensis | Finca El Espavel, San Carlos, Nicaragua | MW80432310 | |
| Phyllodistomum simonae | Profundulus labialis | Río San Carlos, Chiapas, Mexico | MW80432510 | |
| Phyllodistomum cf. symmetrorchis | Clarias gariepinus | Lake Victoria, Kenya | KF01317143 | KF01316243 |
| Phyllodistomum spinopapillatum | Profundulus balsanus | Rio PuebloViejo, Mexico | KM6593824 | |
| Phyllodistomum staffordi | Ameiurus melas | Canada | HQ32502758 | |
| Phyllodistomum wallacei | Xenotaenia resolanae | Mexico | KT3767143 | |
| Phyllodistomum vaili | Mulloidichthys flavolineatus | Lizard Island, Queensland, Australia | KF01317343 | KF01315543 |
| Phyllodistomum virmantasi | Gobiomorus dormitor | Río La Palma, Veracruz, Mexico | W80431510 | |
| Phyllodistomum sp. | Perca fluviatilis | Rybinsk water reservoir on the Volga River, Russia | KY3078696 | KY3078866 |
| Phyllodistomum sp. 5 | Cephalopholis boenak | Australia | KF01317543 | |
| Phyllodistomum sp. 4 | Epibulus insidiator | French Polynesia | KF01317943 | |
| Phyllodistomum sp. | Lampsilis siliquoidea | USA | LC77673112 | |
| Pseudophyllodistomum anguilae | Siniperca scherzeri | China | MH777022, Zhang,S. unpublished | |
| Pseudophyllodistomum johnstoni | Macrobrachium australiense | Warrill Creek, Queensland, Australia | KF01317743 | KF01316643 |
| Pseudophyllodistomum macrobrachicola | Anguilla japonica | Japan | LC0025212 | |
| Gorgodera cygnoides | Rana ridibunda | Switzerland | AF15193862 | |
| G. cygnoides | R. ridibunda | Kokaljane, near Sofia, Bulgaria | AY22226452 | |
| Gorgodera amplicava | Rana catesbeiana | Nebraska, USA | FJ44574363 | |
| Gorgoderina attenuata | Rana clamitans | Nebraska, USA | FJ44574163 | |
| Gorgoderina simplex | R. clamitans | Nebraska, USA | FJ44574263 | |
| Gorgoderina lufengensis | Nanorana yunnanensis | China |
Ding,J. unpublished |
Ding,J. unpublished |
| Gorgoderidae larvae | Lioconcha castrensis | Australia Heron Island, Queensland, Australia | KF013172, KF01319343 | KF013157, KF01316943 |
| Xystretrum solidum | Sphoeroides testudineus | Conch Key, Florida, USA | KF01318843 | KF01314943 |
| Xystretrum caballeroi | Balistes polylepis | Mexico | HQ32503058 | |
| Xystretrum sp. | Sufflamen fraenatum | Ningaloo, Western Australia, Australia | KF01316043 | |
| Outgroup | ||||
| Allocreadium crassum | S. erythrophthalmus | Lithuania: Lake Ilmėdas | OQ35913338 | OQ35914138 |
| Bucephalus polymorphus | D. polymorpha | Belarus | AY28924861 | AY28923961 |
| B. polymorphus | P. fluviatilis | Curonian Lagoon, Lithuania | JQ34672516 | |
| Nagmia floridensis | Rhinoptera bonasus | Gulf of Mexico, East Ship Island, Mississippi, USA | AY22226252 | |
| Maritrema arenaria | Semibalanus balanoides | Belfast Lough, Northern Ireland | HM58417164 | |
aSequences generated in the present study are indicated in bold.
Ethical approval
The Polish Act relating to the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific and Educational Purposes does not apply to the euthanasia of animals when it is intended solely to obtain tissues or organs. An ethical review from the relevant Local Ethics Committee was therefore not required. The anaesthesia and euthanasia of the fish which provided tissues for examination was carried out in compliance with the American Veterinary Medical Association’s (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, and with Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. This research was conducted in compliance with local regulations and legal requirements in the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Lithuania: for fishing with electric devices in the Zesławice reservoir, we obtained a permit from the Provincial Marshall’s Office (RO-II.7143.1.7.2022), and also a letter with a permit from the Polish Angling Association (L.dz. GRW 400/1/2022). The fishing group was headed by a competent person (valid electrofishing certificate number 1825/14) and the capture caused no avoidable pain or distress to the fish. The tenches (T. tinca) from Lake Ilmėdas were caught by an angler possessing a valid license, and in accordance with the regulations and limits applicable in inland fisheries in the Republic of Lithuania. The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Acknowledgements
Our research, which involves catching wild fish in Poland for the purpose of killing them solely for the purpose of using their organs or tissues for parasitological research, is in line with the Resolution of the National Ethical Commission No. 12/2022 of March 11, 2022. The authors would like to warmly thank Artur Klaczak, Paweł Szczerbik (University of Agriculture, Kraków), Łukasz Sroka (Polish Angling Association, Kraków) and Robert Waradzyn for their help with the fieldwork logistics, including assembling and operating the fishing gear, as well as Teofil Zając for his help with preparing the map. This study was conducted in part from the statutory funds of the Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków and in part from the programme for study visits in 2022 run by the International Cooperation Department of the Polish Academy of Sciences. This research was carried out within the framework of the long-term institutional research and experimental development (IIMTEP) program “Biodiversity”, based at the Nature Research Centre (Lithuania), but received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This publication is based upon work from COST Action CA18239: CONFREMU—Conservation of freshwater mussels: a pan-European approach, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The calculations for this research were conducted on the high-performance computer of the Alfred Wagner Institute.
Author contributions
K.Z., R.P., G.S. and V.S. put forward the idea of the project and its implementation plan; K.Z., E. Ł-T and J.D. organized and undertook the fieldwork to capture fish and unionid bivalves; K.Z. carried out the mussel dissections and took the microphotographs; R.P., G.S., and V.S. carried out the fish dissections, collected and fixed the helminths for further morphological and molecular analysis; R.P. and V.S. performed the morphological analysis of the adult helminths and prepared a morphological description and figure with the drawing of an adult; V.S. carried out the molecular phylogenetic analysis; R.P. and V.S. prepared the draft of the article; all the authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
All the authors declare that all the data supporting the results reported in our article have been included in this article.Dataset can be download at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10335684. The datasets generated or analysed during this study are available in the GENE BANK repository, accession numbers: PP061384 - PP061387, PP082092 - PP082094, PP716808, PP718688, PP748525.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ho, H. W., Bray, R. A., Cutmore, S. C., Ward, S. & Cribb, T. H. Two new species of Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899 (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae Looss, 1899) from Great Barrier Reef fishes. Zootaxa 3779, 551–562. 10.11646/zootaxa.3779.5.5 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Urabe, M., Ishibashi, R. & Uehara, K. The life cycle and molecular phylogeny of a gorgoderid trematode recorded from the mussel Nodularia douglasiae in the Yodo River Japan. Parasitol. Int. 64, 26–32. 10.1016/j.parint.2014.09.003 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pérez-Ponce de León, G., Martinez-Aquino, A. & Mendoza-Garfias, B. Two new species of Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), from freshwater fishes (Cypriniformes: Goodeinae) in central Mexico: An integrative taxonomy approach using morphology, ultrastructure and molecular phylogenetics. Zootaxa 4013, 87–99. 10.11646/zootaxa.4013.1.6 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pérez-Ponce de León, G., Pinacho-Pinacho, C. D., Mendoza-Garfias, B. & García-Varela, M. Phyllodistomum spinopapillatum sp. nov. (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), from the Oaxaca killifish Profundulus balsanus (Osteichthyes: Profundulidae) in Mexico, with new host and locality records of P. inecoli: morphology, ultrastructure and molecular evidence. Acta Parasitol. 60, 298–307. 10.1515/ap-2015-0042 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nakao, M. Phyllodistomum kanae sp. nov. (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae), a bladder fluke from the Ezo salamander Hynobius retardatus. Parasitol. Int. 64, 314–318. 10.1016/j.parint.2015.04.003 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stunžėnas, V., Petkevičiūtė, R., Poddubnaya, L. G., Stanevičiūtė, G. & Zhokhov, A. E. Host specificity, molecular phylogeny and morphological differences of Phyllodistomum pseudofolium Nybelin, 1926 and Phyllodistomum angulatum Linstow, 1907 (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae) with notes on Eurasian ruffe as final host for Phyllodistomum spp. Parasit. Vectors 10, 286. 10.1186/s13071-017-2210-9 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cutmore, S. C. & Cribb, T. H. Two species of Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899 (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae) from Moreton Bay Australia. Syst. Parasitol. 95, 325–336. 10.1007/s11230-018-9784-2 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abdel-Gaber, R. et al. Phyllodistomum vaili (Plagiorchiida: Gorgoderidae) infecting Parupeneus rubescens (Perciformes: Mullidae): morphology and phylogeny. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 29, e020019. 10.1590/S1984-29612020005 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Petkevičiūtė, R., Zhokhov, A. E., Stunžėnas, V., Poddubnaya, L. G. & Stanevičiūtė, G. Phyllodistomum kupermani n. sp. from the European perch, Perca fluviatilis L. (Perciformes: Percidae), and redescription of Phyllodistomum macrocotyle (Lühe, 1909) with notes on the species diversity and host specificity in the European Phyllodistomum spp. (Trematoda: Gorgoderidae). Parasit. Vectors 13, 561. 10.1186/s13071-020-04434-2 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pinacho-Pinacho, C. D., Sereno-Uribe, A. L., Hernández-Orts, J. S., García-Varela, M. & Pérez-Ponce de León, G. Integrative taxonomy reveals an even greater diversity within the speciose genus Phyllodistomum (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Gorgoderidae), parasitic in the urinary bladder of middle American freshwater fishes, with descriptions of five new species. Invertebr. Syst. 35, 754–775. 10.1071/IS21007 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choudhary, K., Ray, S., Agrawal, N. & Shamsi, S. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic relationships of Phyllodistomum parasites in Indian subcontinent: Insights from freshwater fish and shrimp hosts. Parasitol. Res. 122, 2301–2315. 10.1007/s00436-023-07930-3 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gosho, M. et al. Molecular phylogenetic position and the life cycle of Phyllodistomum cyprini Feng et Wang, 1995 in Japan, with a note of a larval Phyllodistomum sp. from unionid mussels in North America. Parasitol. Int. 98, 102807 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fischthal, J. H. Rhopalocercariae in the trematode subfamily Gorgoderinae. Am. Midl. Nat. 46, 395–443. 10.2307/2421987 (1951). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Coil, W. H. Two new rhopalocercariae (Gorgoderinae) parasitic in Lake Erie mussels. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 21, 17–29 (1954). [Google Scholar]
- 15.von Baer, K. E. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der niedern Thiere. Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 13, 523–762 (1827). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Petkevičiūtė, R., Stunžėnas, V. & Stanevičiūtė, G. Differentiation of European freshwater bucephalids (Digenea: Bucephalidae) based on karyotypes and DNA sequences. Syst. Parasitol. 87, 199–212. 10.1590/S1984-29612020005 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Orecchia, P., Paggi, L., Castagnolo, L., Della Seta, G. & Minervini, R. Ricerche sperimentali sul ciclo biologico di Phyllodistomum elongatum Nybelin, 1926 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae Looss, 1901). [Experimental research on the biological cycle of Phyllodistomum elongatum Nybelin, 1926 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae Looss, 1901)]. Parassitologia 17, 95–101 (1975) (in Italian). [PubMed]
- 18.Ivantsiv, V. V. & Kurandina, D. P. Life cycle of Phyllodistomum angulatum (Trematoda, Phyllodistomidae). Vestn. Zool. 1, 73–75 (1985) (in Russian). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Petkevičiūtė, R., Stunžėnas, V., Stanevičiūtė, G. & Zhokhov, A. E. European Phyllodistomum (Digenea, Gorgoderidae) and phylogenetic affinities of Cercaria duplicata based on rDNA and karyotypes. Zool. Scripta 44, 191–202. 10.1111/zsc.12080 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sudarikov, V. E. et al. Metacercariae of Trematodes - Parasites of Freshwater Hydrobionts in Central Russia (Nauka Moscow, 2002). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zdun, V. I. Larvae of Trematodes in Freshwater Molluscs of Ukraine (Ukrainian Academy of Sciences Press, 1961). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stadnichenko, A. P. On the role of new and little known species of freshwater molluscs of the Ukrainian fauna in the life cycles of trematodes. Zool. Zhurnal 62, 175–180 (1983). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yanovich, L. N., Belous, L. A., & Gneteckaja, T. L. Trematodes of Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of Central Polissia region of Ukraine In: Parasitology in XXI century–problems, methods, solutions. Proc. IV Congress of the Russian Society of Parasitologist 3, 242–245, (2008).
- 24.Kudlai, O. S. & Yanovich, L. N. Larval stages of Phyllodistomum sp. (Digenea, Gorgoderidae) from the duck mussels Anodonta anatina in Ukraine. Vest. Zool. 47, 37–42 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Taskinen, J. et al. Parasites in sympatric populations of native and invasive freshwater bivalves. Hydrobiologia 848, 3167–3178. 10.1007/s10750-020-04284-0 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marszewska, A. & Cichy, A. Unionid clams and the zebra mussels on their shells (Bivalvia: Unionidae, Dreissenidae) as hosts for trematodes in lakes of the Polish lowland. Folia Malacol. 23, 149–154. 10.12657/folmal.023.011 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Müller, T. et al. Factors affecting trematode infection rates in freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 742, 59–70. 10.1007/s10750-014-1965-7 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hajisafarali, M., Aaltonen, S., Pulkkinen, K. & Taskinen, J. Does the freshwater mussel Anodonta anatina remove the fish pathogen Flavobacterium columnare from water? Hydrobiologia 849, 1067–1081. 10.1007/s10750-021-04769-6 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lopes-Lima, M. Anodonta anatina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T155667A21400363.en (2014).
- 30.Lyubas, A. A. et al. Phylogeography and genetic diversity of duck mussel Anodonta anatina (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Eurasia. Diversity 15, 260. 10.3390/d15020260 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arystanov, E. The effect of ecological factors on infestation of mollusks with parthenites of trematodes in waters of the Amudarja delta. Parasitologia 4, 211–218 (1970). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Taskinen, J. & Valtonen, E. T. Age-, size-, and sex-specific infection of Anodonta piscinalis (Bivalvia: Unionidae) with Rhipidocotyle fennica (Digenea: Bucephalidae) and its influence on host reproduction. Can. J. Zool. 73, 887–897. 10.1139/z95-104 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brian, J. I. & Aldridge, D. C. Endosymbionts: an overlooked threat in the conservation of freshwater mussels?. Biol. Conserv. 237, 155–165. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.037 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pigulevsky, S. W. Family Gorgoderidae Looss, 1901. In Trematodes of Animals and Man (ed. Pigulevsky, S. W.) (Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1953). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Niewiadomska, K. Fish Parasites in Poland. Digenea (Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne, 2003). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koval, V. P. Trematodes of the genus Phyllodistomum Braun, from the fishes of the Ukraine. In Scientific and Applied Problems of Helminthology: the 100th Anniversary of Acad K.I. Skryabin (ed. Koval, V. P.) (Nauka, 1978). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Petkevičiūtė, R., Stunžėnas, V., Stanevičiūtė, G. & Sokolov, S. G. Comparison of the developmental stages of some European allocreadiid trematode species and a clarification of their life-cycles based on ITS2 and 28S sequences. Syst. Parasitol. 76, 169–178. 10.1007/s11230-010-9249-8 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Petkevičiūtė, R., Stunžėnas, V. & Stanevičiūtė, G. Hidden diversity in European Allocreadium spp. (Trematoda, Allocreadiidae) and the discovery of the adult stage of Cercariaeum crassum Wesenberg-Lund, 1934. Diversity 15, 645. 10.3390/d15050645 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pérez-Ponce de León, G. Host-induced morphological variability in adult Posthodiplostomum minimum (Digenea, Neodiplostomidae). J. Parasitol. 81, 818–820. 10.2307/3283989 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Blasco-Costa, I. & Poulin, R. Parasite life-cycle studies: a plea to resurrect an old parasitological tradition. J. Helminthol. 91, 647–656. 10.1017/S0022149X16000924 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kudinova, M. A. On the revision of system of the trematode genus Phyllodistomum Braun, 1899 (Gorgoderidae). In Ecological Parasitology (ed. Kudinova, M. A.) (Karelian Research Center RAS, 1994). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lopes-Lima, M. et al. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the rising sun (Far East Asia): Phylogeny, systematics, and distribution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 146, 1–27. 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106755 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cutmore, S. C., Miller, T. L., Curran, S. S., Bennett, M. B. & Cribb, T. H. Phylogenetic relationships of the Gorgoderidae (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda), including the proposal of a new subfamily (Degeneriinae n. subfam.). Parasitol. Res. 112, 3063–3074. 10.1007/s00436-013-3481-5 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kennedy, M. & Fitzmaurice, P. Biology of the rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L) in Irish Waters, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., B. 74, 245, (1974). [PubMed]
- 45.Kottelat, M. & Freyhof, J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes (Publications Kottelat, 2007). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Michalec, B. Silting characteristic of small reservoirs in cascading and paralel configuration using sedimentation index (Charakterystyka zamulania małych zbiorników wodnych w układzie kaskadowym i równoległym za pomocą wskaźnika sedymentacji). In Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas (ed. Michalec, B.) (Polish Academy of Sciences, 2014). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Michalec, B. & Pęczek, K. Określenie stopnia zamulenia zbiorników wodnych w Zesławicach. Przegląd Naukowy, Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska 17, 178–184 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brian, J. I. & Aldridge, D. C. A rapid, non-destructive method for sampling castrating parasites in endangered bivalve molluscs. Aquat. Conserv. Mar Freshw. Ecosyst. 31, 729–735. 10.1002/aqc.3505 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stunžėnas, V., Petkevičiūtė, R. & Stanevičiūtė, G. Phylogeny of Sphaerium solidum (Bivalvia) based on karyotype and sequences of 16S and ITS1 rDNA. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 6, 105–117. 10.2478/s11535-010-0101-6 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Scholz, T., De Chambrier, A., Kuchta, R., Littlewood, D. T. J. & Waeschenbach, A. Macrobothriotaenia ficta (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of sunbeam snake (Xenopeltis unicolor): Example of convergent evolution. Zootaxa 3640, 485–499. 10.11646/zootaxa.3640.3.12 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tkach, V., Grabda-Kazubska, B., Pawlowski, J. & Swiderski, Z. Molecular and morphological evidences for close phylogenetic affinities of the genera Macrodera, Leptophallus, Metaleptophallus, and Paralepoderma (Digenea, Plagiorchioidea). Acta Parasitol. 44, 170–179 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Olson, P. D., Cribb, T. H., Tkach, V. V., Bray, R. A. & Littlewood, D. T. J. Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). Int. J. Parasitol. 33, 733–755. 10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00049-3 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tkach, V. V., Littlewood, D. T. J., Olson, P. D., Kinsella, M. J. & Swiderski, Z. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Morozov, 1955 (Trematoda: Digenea): a bigger data set resolves fewer genera. Syst. Parasitol. 56, 1–15. 10.1023/A:1025546001611 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bolek, M. G., Snyder, S. D. & Janovy, J. J. Alternative life cycle strategies and colonization of young anurans by Gorgoderina attenuata in Nebraska. J. Parasitol.9, 604–616. 10.1645/GE-1813.1 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Razo-Mendivil, U., Pérez-Ponce de León, G. & Rubio-Godoy, M. Integrative taxonomy identifies a new species of Phyllodistomum (Digenea: Gorgoderidae) from the twospot livebearer, Heterandria bimaculata (Teleostei: Poeciliidae), in Central Veracruz. Mexico. Parasitol. Res. 112, 4137–4150. 10.1007/s00436-013-3605-y (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chaudhary, A., Mukut, S. & Singh, H. S. Molecular characterization of three species belongs to the Allocreadioidea, Hemiuroidea and Plagiorchioidea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) infecting freshwater fishes in India. Helminthologia 53, 378–384. 10.1515/helmin-2016-0039 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rosas-Valdez, R., Choudhury, A. & Pérez-Ponce de León, G. Molecular prospecting for cryptic species in Phyllodistomum lacustri (Platyhelminthes, Gorgoderidae). Zool. Scripta 40, 296–305. 10.1111/j.14636409.2011.00472.x (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Petkevičiūtė, R., Stunžėnas, V. & Stanevičiūtė, G. Cytogenetic and sequence comparison of adult Phyllodistomum (Digenea: Gorgoderidae) from the three-spined stickleback with larvae from two bivalves. Parasitology 129, 771–778. 10.1017/S0031182004006109 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Stunžėnas, V., Cryan, J. R. & Molloy, D. P. Comparison of rDNA sequences from colchicine treated and untreated tissues. Parasitol. Int. 53, 223–228. 10.1016/j.parint.2003.12.003 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tkach, V., Pawlowski, J. & Mariaux, J. Phylogenetic analysis of the suborder Plagiorchiata (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) based on partial lsrDNA sequences. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 83–93. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00163-0 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Galaktionov, K. V., Blasco-Costa, I. & Olson, P. D. Life cycles, molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the ‘pygmaeus’ microphallids (Digenea: Microphallidae): widespread parasites of marine and coastal birds in the Holarctic. Parasitology 139, 1346–1360. 10.1017/S0031182012000583 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All the authors declare that all the data supporting the results reported in our article have been included in this article.Dataset can be download at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10335684. The datasets generated or analysed during this study are available in the GENE BANK repository, accession numbers: PP061384 - PP061387, PP082092 - PP082094, PP716808, PP718688, PP748525.


