Skip to main content
The British Journal of Surgery logoLink to The British Journal of Surgery
. 1993 Oct 1;80(10):1337–1341. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801041

In vitro response of the human and canal longitudinal muscle layer to cholinergic and adrenergic stimulation: Evidence of sphincter specialization

T J O'Kelly 1,, A Brading 2, N J McC Mortensen 3
PMCID: PMC11437594  PMID: 8242318

Abstract

A study was performed to determine the in vitro response of the longitudinal smooth muscle layer (conjoined longitudinal coat) of the human anal canal to cholinergic and adrenergic stimulation, and to compare this with similar features of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and rectal smooth muscle. Tissue was obtained from abdominoperineal and anterior resection specimens, and strips of muscle mounted for isometric tension recording in superfusion organ baths. Both conjoined longitudinal coat and IAS strips generated and maintained spontaneous myogenic tension (mean(s.e.m.) 0·10(0·01) and 0·48(0·04) g per mg tissue respectively), whereas equivalent rectal smooth muscle did not. Stimulation of muscarinic (cholinergic) receptors caused contraction of strips from the conjoined longitudinal coat and rectal smooth muscle layers in a dose-dependent manner (10−7-10−4 mol/l); however, IAS strips relaxed (10−6-10−4 mol/l). Activation of α-adrenergic receptors in conjoined longitudinal coat and IAS strips produced concentration-dependent contraction (10−7 -10−4 mol/l). In comparison, rectal smooth muscle relaxed. All muscle layers relaxed in response to β-adrenoceptor stimulation. These data indicate that in the anal canal both the conjoined longitudinal coat and IAS are specialized sphincteric smooth muscles.

Contributor Information

Mr T J O'Kelly, University Department of Pharmacology and Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford, UK.

A Brading, University Department of Pharmacology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

N J McC Mortensen, Department of Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

References

  • 1. Goligher  JC, ed. Surgical anatomy of the anus, rectum and colon. In: Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. 5th ed. London: Baiilière Tindall, 1984: 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lunniss  PJ, Phillips  RKS. Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg  1992; 79: 82–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Duthie  HL, Watts  JM. Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone of the anal canal. Gut  1965; 6: 64–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Freckner  B, Von Euler  C. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut  1975; 16: 482–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Speakman  CTM, Kamm  MA. The internal anal sphincter–new insight into faecal incontinence. Gut  1991; 32: 345–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bouvier  M, Gonella  J. Electrical activity from smooth muscle of the anal sphincteric area of the cat. J Physiol (Lond)  1981; 310: 445–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Furness  JB, Costa  M, eds. Sympathetic influences on gastrointestinal function. In:The Enteric Nervous System. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987: 207–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kerremans  R, Penninckx  F. A study in vivo of adrenergic receptors in the rectum and internal anal sphincter of the cat. Gut  1970; 11: 709–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rayner  V. Characterisation of the internal anal sphincter and the rectum in the vervet monkey. J Physiol (Lond)  1979; 286: 383–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Burleigh  DE, D'Mello  A, Parks  AG. Responses of isolated human internal anal sphincter to drugs and electrical field stimulation. Gastroenterology  1979; 77: 484–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Furchgott  RF, Zawadzki  JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetyl choline. Nature  1980; 288: 373–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Palmer  RMJ, Ferrige  AG, Moncada  S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium derived relaxing factor. Nature  1987; 327: 524–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Moncada  S, Palmer  RMJ, Higgs  EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev  1991; 43: 109–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Vincent  SR, Hope  BT. Neurons that say NO. Trends Neurosci  1992; 15: 108–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Snyder  S, Bredt  DS. Biological roles of nitric oxide. Sci Am  1992; 5: 68–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sanders  KM, Ward  SM. Nitric oxide as a mediator of nonadrenergic noncholinergic neurotransmission. Am J Physiol  1992; 262: G379-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Courtney  H. Anatomy of the pelvic diaphragm and anorectal musculature as related to sphincter preservation in anorectal surgery. Am J Surg  1950; 79: 155–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shafik  A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defaecation. III. The longitudinal anal muscle: anatomy and role in sphincter mechanism. Investigative Urology  1976; 13: 271–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES