Abstract
Objectives
Mechanisms of non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) resistance to azithromycin have rarely been reported. Here we investigate the epidemiology and genetic features of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates.
Methods
A total of 457 NTS isolates were collected from a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou. We performed antimicrobial susceptibility tests, conjugation experiments, efflux pump expression tests, whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis to conduct the study.
Results
The results showed that 10 NTS isolates (2.8%) were resistant to azithromycin with minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 128 to 512 mg/L and exhibited multidrug resistance. The phylogenetic tree revealed that 5 S. London isolates (AR1–AR5) recognized at different times and departments were closely related [3–74 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] and 2 S. Typhimurium isolates (AR7 and AR8) were clones (<3 SNPs) at 3-month intervals. The azithromycin resistance was conferred by mph(A) gene found on different plasmids, including IncFIB, IncHI2, InFII, IncC and IncI plasmids. Among them, IncFIB, InFII and IncHI2 plasmids carried different IS26-class 1 integron (intI1) arrangement patterns that mediated multidrug resistance transmission. Conjugative IncC plasmid encoded resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that mph(A)-positive plasmids closely related to 10 plasmids in this study were mainly discovered from NTS, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Enterobacter hormaechei. The genetic environment of mph(A) in 10 NTS isolates was IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS6100/IS26 that co-arranged with intI1 harbour multidrug-resistant (MDR) gene cassettes on diverse plasmids.
Conclusions
These findings highlighted that the dissemination of these plasmids carrying mph(A) and various intI1 MDR gene cassettes would seriously restrict the availability of essential antimicrobial agents for treating NTS infections.
Introduction
Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) is a common bacterial pathogen that causes many severe cases of foodborne illness in humans. It is estimated that NTS causes 93.8 million infectious gastroenteritis and 155 000 deaths globally each year.1 NTS is composed of more than 2600 serotypes and nearly 1600 serotypes classified as Salmonella enterica subspecies that are correlated with gastrointestinal diseases worldwide.2 In many developing countries, NTS infections are common, resulting in diarrheal disease and posing a serious threat to children, the elderly and the immunocompromised.3,4 The FDA has approved three different antimicrobial agents for the treatment of NTS infections in the USA: ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and azithromycin.5–7 However, the resistance rate of NTS to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone has increased dramatically in recent years in China.8–11 As an alternative to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone, azithromycin is a significant antimicrobial agent against multidrug-resistant (MDR) NTS.12
Owing to its superior permeability, enhanced pharmacokinetics and metabolic stability, the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin could be used for treating clinical infections caused by foodborne pathogens including Escherichia coli and NTS.13–17 However, azithromycin-resistant NTS are on the rise due to the increasing use of azithromycin.18 Several mechanisms of resistance to macrolides had been described in Enterobacteriaceae, including drug-modifying enzymes, the activity of efflux pumps, target mutations and methylation of 23S rRNA.19–23 In a UK-based retrospective investigation, it was found that 16 out of 667 NTS (2.3%) showed resistance to azithromycin, with the efflux pump gene mef(B) and phosphorylase genes mph(A) and mph(B) being responsible for this resistance.24 A total of 76 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates were found among 2431 NTS isolates (3.1%) from 2017 to 2018 in Taiwan, with the antimicrobial resistance mediated by methylase genes erm(B) and erm(42), phosphorylase gene mph(A) and efflux pump-regulating gene ramAp.25 At present, the prevalence and resistance mechanisms of NTS with azithromycin resistance in northern Guangzhou are unknown. In this study, we described the prevalence and genetic characterization of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates from a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China.
Materials and methods
Bacterial isolations
From 21 May 2020 to 22 December 2021, 469 NTS strains isolated from different patients were identified at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of the Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, using the Advanced Expert System of the VITEK-2 COMPACT automated microbial identification system (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 were used as the quality control strains.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates for azithromycin (AZM), ceftriaxone (CRO), ciprofloxacin (CIP), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefoxitin (FOX), cefuroxime (CXM), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), levofloxacin (LEV), amikacin (AK), tigecycline and sulfamethoxazole (SXT) were determined by broth microdilution. The MIC values of azithromycin-resistant 10 NTS isolates for ampicillin (AMP) and chloramphenicol (DHL) were determined by the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. The interpretation of the results was determined based on the CLSI breakpoints and azithromycin MIC of ≥32 mg/L was considered to be resistant (ci S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online).26
Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
The genomic DNA of 10 NTS isolates was extracted by the bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Nanopore PromethION platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd, Oxford, UK) and Illumina NavoSeq PE150 (Illumina, SanDiego, CA, USA) at the Novogene company (Tianjin, China). It was done with R9.4 flowcells and high accuracy was used as a basecalling model. The quality of the raw sequence reads was evaluated by the interactive program FastQC,27 assembled by Unicycler 0.4.828 and annotated by Prokka 1.13.29 MLST 2.18.030 was used for analysing sequence types serotypes of NTS, and SISTR 1.1.131 was used for confirming serotypes. Staramr 0.5.132 was performed to screen bacterial genome contigs. The ResFinder 4.1,33 PlasmidFinder 2.134 and ISfinder35 were used to identify resistance genes, plasmid incompatible type (Inc type) and insertion sequences, respectively. Core-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was generated by Parsnp36 and the phylogenetic tree of core-genome SNP was constructed with MEGA X.37 The BLASTn algorithm38 was used to screen 1133 plasmids carrying mph(A) gene from the PLSDB database.39 Phylogenetic trees were built by selecting plasmids with the same replicon as the five plasmid Inc types in this study and with orthologous genes identified by OrthoFinder,40 including IncFIB (n = 482), IncFII (435), IncHI2 (100), IncC (111) and IncI1 (15). A total of 35 mph(A)-positive plasmids obtained from PLSDB database, with coverage >87% compared with the plasmid in this study (reference), were selected for sequence comparison using BLASTn and visualized with BRIG (Table S2).41
Conjugation experiments and PCR assays
The transferability of IncC and IncI plasmids carrying mph(A) sanger gene was determined by conjugation experiments using rifampicin-resistant E. coli C600 as the recipient strain. Transconjugants were selected on Luria–Bertani agar plates containing rifampicin (100 mg/L) and azithromycin (32 mg/L). The transconjugants carrying mph(A) gene were then identified by PCR sequencing and primers were mph(A)-F:5′-ATGCGTGCACTACGCAAAG-3′ and mph(A)-R: 5′-CGAGCGGGCTATATCG AC-3′.42 PCR conditions were 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min and 72°C for 3 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were verified by sanger sequencing (BGI Tech Solutions Co., Limited, Beijing, China) and subsequently analysed by comparing to mph(A) gene sequences of AR6 and AR10 using the DNAMAN software (Lynnon BioSoft, Quebec, Canada). The antimicrobial susceptibility of the transconjugants was confirmed by broth microdilution. The conjugation experiments were performed twice.
RT-qPCR analysis of efflux pump genes
Different serotypes of 10 NTS isolates were selected as representatives (AR1, AR6, AR7, AR9 and AR10) for measuring the relative expression of efflux pump genes (acrB, acrD, acrF, mdsB, mdtB, mdfA, emrB, mdtJ, macB, tolC, ompF, ompC, ompA and ompS2). Of these, five NTS isolates were incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm until the density of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL. The total RNA of five NTS isolates was extracted by Bacterial RNA Kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China) and then RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (Takara). cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR using Taq SYBR Green qPCR Premix (Innovagene, Changsha, China) as described in the manufacturer’s instructions on Nucleic Acid Amplification. After a 10 min activation of the modified Taq polymerase at 95°C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C and 30 s at 72°C were performed. Data acquisition was done at 60°C and 72°C. The relative gene expression for pump gene transcripts was calculated against the internal control 16S rRNA gene. The relative expression of efflux pump genes in five NTS isolates was calculated against S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (expression = 1), which served as the control to evaluate overexpressed pump genes. The primer sequences were listed in Table S3. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the relative expression level of pump genes.43 All reactions were performed in triplicate.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Xi-Wei Zhang, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing-Jie Song, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shi-Han Zeng, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Lan Huang, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Jun Luo, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei-Long Guo, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Yan Li, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People’s Hospital of Shunde), No. 1 Jiazi Road, Lunjiao, Shunde District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Data availability
The complete whole genome sequences of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates had been deposited at GenBank under the accession ID listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical information and genomic characterization of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates
| Isolates | Date of isolation | Department | Salmonella serovar | ST | Vehicle of resistance genes | Resistance genesa | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR1 | 2020/7/31 | Physical Examination | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIX000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),floR,tet(A),aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR2 | 2021/10/5 | Oncology | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIW000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,floR,tet(A),mph(A),aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)Ib,aac(3)IId,catA2,sul1,sul2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR3 | 2021/7/26 | Pediatrics | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIV000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,mph(a),flor,tet(A),aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,catA2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR4 | 2021/12/4 | Dispensary | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIU000000000 |
| IncFII | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,bla CTX-M-24 ,floR,tet(A),mph(A),aac(3)-IId,aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(6′)-Iaa,ant(3″)-Ia,sul1,sul2,floR,catA2,arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16 | ||||||
| AR5 | 2020/7/20 | Physical Examination | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIT000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),floR,tet(A),aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,catA2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR6 | 2020/9/9 | Physical Examination | Thompson | 26 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIS000000000 |
| IncC | qepA8,qnrS1,bla TEM-1 ,bla CMY-2 ,mph(A),dfrA12,aadA2,sul1,sul2,aph(3″)-Ib,aph(6)-Id,tet(A),floR | ||||||
| AR7 | 2021/7/28 | Paediatrics | Typhimurium | 34 | Chromosome | bla TEM-1 ,tet(B),sul2,aph(3')-Ib,aph(6)-Id,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIR000000000 |
| IncHI2 | qnrS1,bla CTX-M-55 ,bla LAP-2 ,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),ant(3″)-Ia,aac(3)-IId,lnu(F),dfrA14,aadA16,sul3 | ||||||
| IncHI1&IncR | arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16,sul1,floR | ||||||
| AR8 | 2021/9/25 | Paediatrics | Typhimurium | 34 | Chromosome | bla TEM-1 ,tet(B),sul2,aph(3″)-Ib,aph(6)-Id,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIQ000000000 |
| IncHI2 | qnrS1,bla CTX-M-55 ,bla LAP-2 ,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),lnu(F),dfrA14,aadA16,sul3,arr-3,ant(3″)-Ia,aac(3)-IId | ||||||
| IncHI1&IncR | arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16,sul1,floR | ||||||
| AR9 | 2020/6/26 | Pediatrics | Saintpaul | 27 | Chromosome | floR,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIP000000000 |
| IncHI2 |
qnrS1,bla
LAP-2
,bla
TEM-1
,bla
CTX-M-55
,mph(A),aph(3')-Ia,aph(6)-Id, floR,arr-2,dfrA14,tet(A) |
||||||
| AR10 | 2021/2/20 | Pediatrics | Rissen | 469 | Chromosome | qnrS1,bla TEM-1 ,sul2,floR,dfrA12,aadA2,cmlA1,aadA1,sul3,tet(A),tet(M),aac(6′)-Iaa,ant(3″)-Ia | JAVAIO000000000 |
| IncI1 | bla CTX-M-123 ,mph(A),fosA3 |
aAzithromycin-resistant gene is indicated in bold.
Results
Azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates
A total of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates (2.63%) were identified from 457 NTS clinical isolates in a tertiary hospital in northern Guangzhou, with MIC values of 128 mg/L (n = 7), 256 mg/L (2), and 512 mg/L (1) (Table 1). The 10 NTS isolates were mostly detected between June and October (n = 8) and were identified in departments including paediatrics (n = 5), physical examination (3), oncology (1) and pharmacy (1). The serotypes of 10 NTS isolates consisted of S. London ST155 (n = 5), S. Typhimurium ST34 (2), S. Saintpaul ST27 (1), S. Thompson ST26 (1) and S. Rissen ST469 (1).
Phylogenetic tree analysis and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes
SNPs phylogenetic tree revealed that 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates were divided into two genetically distinct clades (Figure 1a). S. Rissen AR10 was found in a clade and other NTS isolates (n = 9) were located in another clade. Among them, 5 S. London isolates identified at different times and sites were closely related with 3–74 SNPs, which encoded resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin (AR5 was susceptible to chloramphenicol). Furthermore, two S. Typhimurium isolates AR7 and AR8 discovered in paediatrics 2 months apart were clones (two SNPs) and possessed identical resistance phenotype with S. Saintpaul AR9. S. Thompson AR6 and S. Rissen AR10 were in different clades but both exhibited resistance to first-line drugs ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, ampicillin, chloramphenicol and sulfamethoxazole.
Figure 1.
Phylogeny tree and the heatmap of antimicrobial resistance genes of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates in this study and NTS isolates from the NCBI database. (a) Phylogenetic tree relationships and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of the 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates in this study. (b) SNP distances and the spectrum of resistance genes in NTS isolates with different serotypes. The blue circles were added to represent these NTS isolates in this study. The resistance genes for diverse antibiotics are marked by coloured boxes and blank boxes reflect the resistance genes that were not found. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.
The whole-genome sequence of 6 S. London ST34, 4 S. Thompson ST26, 4 S. Typhimurium ST34, 3 S. Saintpaul ST27 and 4 S. Rissen ST469 isolates with close phylogenetic relationship to the 10 NTS isolates in this study were extracted from the NCBI database (Table S4). The phylogenetic analysis of the 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates indicated the following: (i) 5 S. London isolates (AR1–AR5, ST155) and 6 S. London isolates identified in China (Chengde, Huaian and Taiwan) were closely related and had similar resistance genes profiles;30 (ii) S. Thompson AR6 (ST26) carried identical resistance genes with three S. Thompson isolates detected in China (Hefei, Shanghai and Taiwan); (iii) two S. Typhimurium isolates that closely phylogenetically related to S. Typhimurium AR7 and AR8 (ST34) were detected in China (Guangzhou and Hangzhou) with their resistance gene profiles are different; (iv) S. Saintpaul AR9 (ST27) and ASM2069170v1 (Guangzhou, China, 2014) were clones (no SNPs) and harboured the same resistance genes profiles. (v) S. Rissen AR10 (ST469) had 63–76 SNP distances with four S. Rissen strains derived in Shenzhen and AR10 additionally carried mph(A), blaCTXM-123 and fosA that were located on the IncI1 plasmid (Figure 1b).
Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of mph(A)-positive plasmids
mph(A) gene encoding azithromycin phosphotransferase was found on various Inc types of plasmids in 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates, including IncFIB (4/10), IncHI2 (3/10), IncFII (1/10), IncC (1/10) and IncI1(1/10) (Table 1). To evaluate the homology and genomic relationship of mph(A)-positive plasmids from this study and different bacterial species, 1119 mph(A)-harbouring plasmids were extracted from the PLSDB database. The 1119 mph(A)-positive plasmids were frequently found in E. coli (47.98%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (30.78%) and Salmonella (5.17%), with others including Vibrio spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonas spp., Proteus spp. and Leclercia spp. (Table S5). These plasmids from the 10 NTS isolates in this study were included for constructing phylogenetic trees of IncFIB (Figure 2a), IncFII (Figure 2b), IncHI2 (Figure 2c), IncC (Figure 2d) and IncI1 (Figure 2e) plasmids, respectively.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic analysis of IncFIB, IncFII, IncHI2, IncC and IncI1 plasmids, respectively. OrthoFinder was used to predict gene families and FigTree was used to construct the phylogenetic trees. (a) Phylogenetic tree was built using 482 mph(A)-harbouring IncFIB plasmids. (b) Phylogenetic tree was built using 435 mph(A)-positive IncFII plasmids. (c) Phylogenetic tree was built using 100 mph(A)-carrying IncHI2 plasmids. (d) Phylogenetic tree was built using 111 mph(A)-positive IncC plasmids. (e) Phylogenetic tree was built using 15 mph(A)-harbouring IncI1 plasmids. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.
For the phylogenetic tree of IncFIB plasmids, four IncFIB plasmids of four S. London isolates (AR1, AR2, AR3 and AR5) in this study formed a clade (shown in red) with other six IncFIB plasmids that were all recovered from NTS (Figure 2a). Among them, AR2p exhibited the highest sequence coverage (91%–98%) to five IncFIB plasmids in China (Shenzhen, Hongkong and Huaian districts), especially to the plasmid pSa76-CIP (accession: CP047116; 98% coverage) isolated from Hong Kong in China (Table S2). These plasmids mostly carried MDR regions flanked by IS26 that contained 8 resistance genes (mph(A), arr-3, dfrA27, aadA16, qnrB6, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, floR and sul1), Class 1 integron (intI1) and insertion sequences (IS26, ISCR1, IS6100) (Figure 3a).
Figure 3.
Circle Sequence comparison analysis of IncFIB, IncFII, IncHI2, IncC and IncI1 plasmids, respectively. (a) Sequence comparison between IncFIB plasmid of S. London AR2 (AR2p, reference) and four closely related IncFIB plasmids. (b) Sequence comparison between IncFII plasmid of S. London AR4 (reference) and four closely related IncFII plasmids. (c) Sequence comparison between IncHI2 plasmid of S. Typhimurium AR7 (AR7p, reference) and seven closely related IncHI2 plasmids. (d) Sequence comparison between IncC plasmid of S. Thompson AR6 (reference) and eight closely related IncC plasmids. (e) Sequence comparison between IncI1 plasmid of S. Rissen AR10 (reference) and five closely related IncI1 plasmids. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.
In the phylogenetic tree of IncFII plasmids, the clade marked in red suggested relatedness between the IncFII plasmid of S. London AR4 (AR4p) from NTS in our research and the other 19 IncFII plasmids from different bacterial species (Figure 2b). Among them, Genome mapping showed AR4p exhibited a high level of sequence coverage (88%–90%) to five IncFII plasmids (containing two from Klebsiella, one from E. coli, one from E. hormaechei) discovered from Thailand and China (Nanchang, Meishan, Chengdu and Henan regions), all of which harboured similar backbones and differentiated in resistance gene region (Figure 3b and Table S2). In addition, AR4p carried the high similar MDR region as four IncFIB plasmids from this study.
The phylogenetic tree of IncHI2 plasmids displayed that 3 IncHI2 plasmids of 2 S. Typhimurium isolates (AR7 and AR8) and S. Saintpaul AR9 in that study and other 14 IncHI2 plasmids were detected in the same clade labelled in red (Figure 2c). Among them, AR7p exhibited high sequence coverage (89%–100%) to 12 IncHI2 plasmids (containing 3 from NTS, 6 from Escherichia and 1 from E. hormaechei) from different countries, especially to the plasmid pCFSAN086836 (accession: CP039440.1; 100% coverage) from S. Kentucky in Guangzhou (Table S2). All of these IncHI2 plasmids shared 54 kb complex intI1-IS26 arrangements that included 14 antimicrobial resistance genes [mph(A), dfrA14, arr-2, cmlA5, qnrS1, blaTEM-2, blaCTX-M-55, blaLAP-2, aac(3′)-IId, lnu(F), aph(3″)-Ia and sul3] interspersed with ISs (IS26, intI1, IS26, Tn3, ISEcp1 and IS1), integron (intI1) and transposons (Tn3) (Figure 3c).
The mph(A)-positive IncC plasmids are widely detected in diverse bacterial genera, and the IncC plasmid of S. Thompson AR6 (AR6p) had a close phylogenetic relationship with 15 IncC plasmids (containing 6 from Salmonella, 9 from other Enterobacteriaceae) in the same cluster presented in red (Figures 2d and 3d). Among them, AR6p exhibited a high level of sequence coverage (95%–100%) to four IncC plasmids isolated from Salmonella in China (Guangzhou, Hefei, Shanghai and Guangdong regions), containing the plasmid pSal009 (accession: CP050832.1; 100% coverage) from pork in China. These plasmids harboured the same backbones with various antimicrobial resistance genes.
The phylogenetic tree of IncI1 plasmids showed the IncI1 plasmid of S. Rissen AR10 (AR10p) in our study formed a clade (present in red) with other four IncI1 plasmids that were recovered from E. coli in China, Japan and Korea (Figure 2e). Sequence comparison revealed that AR10p carrying mph(A) and blaCTX-M-123 exhibited highest degree of sequence similarity (92%–100% coverage) to them (Figure 3e), especially to the plasmid pHNAH4-1(accession: NC_024955.2; 100% coverage) from Hong Kong in China and plasmid pCTXM123_C0996 (accession: NZ_KP198616.1; 99% coverage) from Anhui in China (Table S2).
Genetic environment of plasmid-mediated mph(A) gene
Two structures of mph(A) clusters were characterized from 10 mph(A)-positive plasmids in this study and named Types I and II (Figure 4). Type I was the IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS6100 cluster found on IncFIIB, IncFII and IncC plasmids. In addition, Class 1 integron (IntI1) gene cassette arrangements were located upstream or downstream of the cluster, including IS26-intI1-aac(6′)Ib-cr-arr-3-dfrA27-aadA16-ISCR1 (IncFIB and IncFII plasmids) and IS6100-intI1-qepA2-dfrA12-sul1-TnAs1 (IncC plasmid). Type II located on the IncI1 and IncHI2 plasmids was IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS26 that IS6100 was replaced by IS26 compared with Type I. IntI1 gene cassette array IS26-intI1-dfrA14-arr-2-cmlA5-IS26 was discovered upstream of the mph(A) cluster on 3 IncHI2 plasmids.
Figure 4.
Genetic environment of mph(A) gene on different plasmids. Coloured arrows represent open reading frames, and the direction of the arrowheads indicates the direction of transcription. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.
Conjugation experiments
Conjugation experiments indicated that the IncC and IncI1 plasmids could be transferred to the recipient E. coli C600 determined by PCR amplification, while the IncFIB, IncHI2 and IncFII plasmids failed to perform conjugation assays due to carrying rifampicin resistance. The transconjugant AR6TC exhibited resistance to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and sulfamethoxazole, which was mediated by mph(A), qnrS1, qepA8, blaTEM-1, blaCMY-2, sul1, sul2 and floR that were located on the IncC plasmid (Table 2). Acquisition of the IncI1 plasmid rendered the AR10TC resistant to azithromycin and ceftriaxone with MIC values of 64 and 32 mg/L, respectively.
Table 2.
MIC values of E. coli C600 that had acquired mph(A) gene by transformation
| MIC (mg/L) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZM | AMC | TZP | FOX | CXM | CAZ | CRO | FEP | AK | CIP | LEV | TGC | SXT | |||
| Strain | Organism | Plasmid Inc Type | |||||||||||||
| C600 | E. coli | \ | <4 | 4 | ≤4 | 8 | 8 | 0.5 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.12 | ≤2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.5 | ≤20 |
| AR6 | S. Thompson | IncC | 128 | 32 | ≤4 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | ≤0.12 | ≤2 | 16 | 4 | 1 | ≥320 |
| AR6TC | E. coli | IncC | 64 | 32 | ≤4 | 32 | 16 | 32 | 32 | ≤0.12 | ≤2 | 4 | 4 | ≤0.5 | ≥320 |
| AR10 | S. Rissen | IncI1 | 512 | 16 | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥32 | ≤2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | ≥320 |
| AR10TC | E. coli | IncI1 | 64 | 16 | ≤4 | 8 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥64 | 16 | ≤2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.5 | ≤20 |
AZM, azithromycin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; FOX, cefoxitin; CXM, cefuroxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; AK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; LEV, levofloxacin; TGC, tigecycline; SXT, sulfamethoxazole.
Discussion
NTS often invades human sterile parts beyond the gut and causes severe diseases including sepsis and meningitis, with mortality incidences of up to 15% in Asia.44 Azithromycin is the last resort for the treatment of life-threatening salmonellosis caused by MDR and extensively drug-resistant Salmonella.45 In this study, we discovered 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates (2.63%) from a tertiary care hospital in Guangzhou between 2020 and 2021, whose resistance rate was higher than the reports in Australia (0.9%) and Europe (0.5%).46,47 Previous studies have demonstrated that MIC values of NTS resistance to azithromycin were 16–128 mg/L in Latin America, the United Kingdom, and France.19,48,49 Our study showed that the 10 NTS isolates had high levels of resistance to azithromycin and were resistant to the regular first-line drugs including ampicillin (100%), sulfamethoxazole (100%), chloramphenicol (90%), ciprofloxacin (60%) and ceftriaxone (50%), suggesting that more attention should be focused on the development of antimicrobial resistance in NTS. Phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that five S. London isolates (AR1–AR5) derived from different times and departments were closely related and two S. Typhimurium clones were discovered in paediatrics at 2-month intervals. Moreover, 21 NTS isolates with close phylogenetic relationships to the 10 NTS isolates in this study were also found in several regions of China. These results underlined the necessity to concern the epidemic dissemination of NTS in different geographic regions.
Azithromycin resistance of 10 NTS isolates was mediated by mph(A) gene located on IncFIB(4/10), IncFII(1/10), IncHI2(3/10), IncC(1/10) and IncI1(1/10) plasmids, and the reports of mph(A) gene carried by these plasmids have been described.7,42 Among these plasmids, four IncFIB and IncFII plasmids carried highly comparable 18 kb MDR regions that IS26 played a key role in transmission.50 Three IncHI2 plasmids all carried a 54 kb IS26-intI1 arrangement involving a variety of resistance genes and are widely disseminated in the IncHI2 plasmids of Enterobacteriaceae.51,52 Conjugative IncC plasmid that encoded resistance to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, chloramphenicol and sulfamethoxazole significantly constrained the therapeutic options of NTS infections.49,53,54 Additionally, phylogenetic analysis revealed that other mph(A)-positive plasmids that showed a close genetic relationship with plasmids in this study were widely recovered from diverse bacterial species, including (i) IncFIB and IncC plasmids which were recovered from NTS in China;30 (ii) the IncFII plasmids were isolated from K. pneumoniae, E. coli and E. hormaechei;55 (iii) IncHI2 plasmids were mostly distributed in NTS and E. coli;56,57 (iv) IncI1 plasmids were identified in E. coli. These findings underlined the importance of monitoring the epidemiology of mph(A)-positive plasmids in different hosts.
By investigating the genetic environment of the plasmid-mediated mph(A) gene, it was noted that the mph(A) cluster “IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS6100/IS26” was the most common and had been widely discovered in many bacterial species.58,59 The IS26 and IS6100, which are classified as IS6 family transposons, played an essential role in the transmission of the mph(A) cluster.50 Meanwhile, we found that the mph(A) cluster and intI1 harbouring various resistance gene cassettes are co-arranged on different plasmids in the 10 NTS isolates. Sequence analysis revealed that these different mph(A)-IntI1 arrangements are also frequently detected in NTS and E. coli. The arrangement patterns of mph(A) gene with intI1 variable resistance gene cassettes would result in the prevalence of MDR NTS and pose a huge challenge to public health.60,61 In addition, we observed no changes in the expression of efflux pumps and outer membrane proteins (Table S6). No azithromycin resistance mutation was discovered in the 23S rRNA gene or the L22 and L4 protein sequences.
In summary, 10 NTS isolates with a high degree of azithromycin resistance were identified from patients and exhibited regional cloning epidemics. mph(A) gene associated with azithromycin resistance located on various plasmids and the close phylogenetic relationship of mph(A)-harbouring plasmids were discovered in Enterobacteriaceae. More importantly, mph(A) gene in the form of cluster IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS6100/IS26 co-arranged with intI1 variable multidrug resistance gene cassettes on diverse plasmids contributed to the emergence and prevalence of MDR NTS. Further work is required to monitor the transmission and evolution of these plasmids in bacterial pathogens.
Funding
This project was funded by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund Provincial Enterprise Joint Fund (2021A1515220153), Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (2022A1515012481), and President Foundation of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (No. YZ2022ZX01).
Transparency declarations
The authors all declare they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary data
Tables S1–S6 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.
References
- 1. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E et al. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50: 882–9. 10.1086/650733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rakitin AL, Yushina YK, Zaiko EV et al. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance of salmonella serotypes and whole-genome sequencing of multiresistant strains isolated from food products in Russia. Antibiotics 2021; 11: 1. 10.3390/antibiotics11010001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA et al. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28: 901–37. 10.1128/CMR.00002-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. The global burden of non-typhoidal salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 1312–24. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yang WC, Chan OW, Wu TL et al. Development of ceftriaxone resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Oranienburg during therapy for bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2016; 49: 41–5. 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Klemm EJ, Shakoor S, Page AJ et al. Emergence of an extensively drug-resistant salmonella enterica serovar typhi clone harboring a promiscuous plasmid encoding resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins. mBio 2018; 9: e00105-18. 10.1128/mBio.00105-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee . WHO Guidelines on Use of Medically Important Antimicrobials in Food-Producing Animals. World Health Organization, 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wong MH, Yan M, Chan EW et al. Emergence of clinical Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates with concurrent resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 3752–6. 10.1128/AAC.02770-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Shi Q, Ye Y, Lan P et al. Prevalence and characteristics of ceftriaxone-resistant salmonella in children’s hospital in Hangzhou, China. Front Microbiol 2021; 12: 764787. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.764787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wu LJ, Luo Y, Shi GL et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics and changes of antibiotic resistance in children with nontyphoidal salmonella infections from 2009–2018 in Chongqing, China. Infect Drug Resist 2021; 14: 1403–13. 10.2147/IDR.S301318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liang Z, Ke B, Deng X et al. Serotypes, seasonal trends, and antibiotic resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella from human patients in Guangdong Province, China, 2009–2012. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15: 53. 10.1186/s12879-015-0784-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liu X, Yang X, Ye L et al. Genetic characterization of a conjugative plasmid that encodes azithromycin resistance in enterobacteriaceae. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10: e0078822. 10.1128/spectrum.00788-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mosholder AD, Mathew J, Alexander JJ et al. Cardiovascular risks with azithromycin and other antibacterial drugs. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1665–8. 10.1056/NEJMp1302726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fiese EF, Steffen SH. Comparison of the acid stability of azithromycin and erythromycin A. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25(Suppl A): 39–47. 10.1093/jac/25.suppl_A.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Girard AE, Girard D, English AR et al. Pharmacokinetic and in vivo studies with azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new macrolide with an extended half-life and excellent tissue distribution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1948–54. 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Retsema J, Girard A, Schelkly W et al. Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1939–47. 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Effa EE, Bukirwa H. Withdrawn: azithromycin for treating uncomplicated typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2011: CD006083. 10.1002/14651858.CD006083.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kahn R, Eyal N, Sow SO et al. Mass drug administration of azithromycin: an analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29: 326–31. 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yang X, Liu X, Yang C et al. A conjugative IncI1 plasmid carrying erm(B) and bla(CTX-M-104) that mediates resistance to azithromycin and cephalosporins. Microbiol Spectr 2021; 9: e0028621. 10.1128/Spectrum.00286-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gomes C, Martínez-Puchol S, Ruiz-Roldán L et al. Development and characterisation of highly antibiotic resistant Bartonella bacilliformis mutants. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 33584. 10.1038/srep33584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Weisblum B. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 577–85. 10.1128/AAC.39.3.577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gomes C, Martínez-Puchol S, Palma N et al. Macrolide resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae: focus on azithromycin. Crit Rev Microbiol 2017; 43: 1–30. 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1136261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sajib MSI, Tanmoy AM, Hooda Y et al. Tracking the emergence of azithromycin resistance in multiple genotypes of typhoidal Salmonella. mBio 2021; 12: e03481-20. 10.1128/mBio.03481-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nair S, Ashton P, Doumith M et al. WGS for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: a pilot study to detect the prevalence and mechanism of resistance to azithromycin in a UK population of non-typhoidal Salmonella. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 3400–8. 10.1093/jac/dkw318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chiou CS, Hong YP, Wang YW et al. Antimicrobial resistance and mechanisms of azithromycin resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates in Taiwan, 2017 to 2018. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11: e0336422. 10.1128/spectrum.03364-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sjölund-Karlsson M, Joyce K, Blickenstaff K et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility to azithromycin among Salmonella enterica isolates from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3985–9. 10.1128/AAC.00590-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA. FQC dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics 2017; 33: 3137–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL et al. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13: e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30: 2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 1355–61. 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yoshida CE, Kruczkiewicz P, Laing CR et al. The Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource (SISTR): an open web-accessible tool for rapidly typing and subtyping draft Salmonella genome assemblies. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0147101. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yin X, Fu Y, Tate H et al. Genomic analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium from humans and food sources accurately predicts phenotypic multi-drug resistance. Food Microbiol 2022; 103: 103957. 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 3491–500. 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 3895–903. 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L et al. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: D32–6. 10.1093/nar/gkj014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S et al. The harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 2014; 15: 524. 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M et al. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35: 1547–9. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403–10. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Schmartz GP, Hartung A, Hirsch P et al. PLSDB: advancing a comprehensive database of bacterial plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50: D273–D8. 10.1093/nar/gkab1111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20: 238. 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL et al. Blast Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 2011; 12: 402. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Xie M, Chen K, Chan EW et al. Identification and genetic characterization of two conjugative plasmids that confer azithromycin resistance in Salmonella. Emerg Microbes Infect 2022; 11: 1049–57. 10.1080/22221751.2022.2058420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li L, Wang L, Yang S et al. Tigecycline-resistance mechanisms and biological characteristics of drug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium strains in vitro. Vet Microbiol 2024; 288: 109927. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Marchello CS, Birkhold M, Crump JA. Complications and mortality of non-typhoidal salmonella invasive disease: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22: 692–705. 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00615-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Williamson DA, Lane CR, Easton M et al. Increasing antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates in Australia from 1979 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: e02012-17. 10.1128/AAC.02012-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Faccone D, Lucero C, Albornoz E et al. Emergence of azithromycin resistance mediated by the mph(A) gene in Salmonella Typhimurium clinical isolates in Latin America. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018; 13: 237–9. 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) . The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2020/2021. EFSA J 2023; 21: e07867. 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Le Hello S, Harrois D, Bouchrif B et al. Highly drug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198-X1: a microbiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 672–9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70124-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen K, Yang C, Chan EW et al. Emergence of conjugative IncC type plasmid simultaneously encoding resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin in Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e0104621. 10.1128/AAC.01046-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Harmer CJ, Moran RA, Hall RM. Movement of IS26-associated antibiotic resistance genes occurs via a translocaci unit that includes a single IS26 and preferentially inserts adjacent to another IS26. mBio 2014; 5: e01801-14. 10.1128/mBio.01801-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Shang D, Zhao H, Xu X et al. Conjugative IncHI2 plasmid harboring novel class 1 integron mediated dissemination of multidrug resistance genes in Salmonella Typhimurium. Food Control 2021; 122: 107810. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107810 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zhao H, Chen W, Xu X et al. Transmissible ST3-IncHI2 plasmids are predominant carriers of diverse complex IS26-class 1 integron arrangements in multidrug-resistant Salmonella. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 2492. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhang Y, Lei CW, Chen X et al. Characterization of IncC plasmids in enterobacterales of food-producing animals originating from China. Front Microbiol 2020; 11: 580960. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Liu J, Xie L, Zhao D et al. A fatal diarrhoea outbreak in farm-raised Deinagkistrodon acutus in China is newly linked to potentially zoonotic Aeromonas hydrophila. Transbound Emerg Dis 2019; 66: 287–98. 10.1111/tbed.13020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sugawara Y, Akeda Y, Hagiya H et al. Spreading patterns of NDM-producing enterobacteriaceae in clinical and environmental settings in Yangon, Myanmar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63: e01924-18. 10.1128/AAC.01924-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Liu L, He D, Lv L et al. blaCTX-M-1/9/1 hybrid genes may have been generated from blaCTX-M-15 on an IncI2 plasmid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 4464–70. 10.1128/AAC.00501-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ho PL, Liu MC, Lo WU et al. Prevalence and characterization of hybrid blaCTX-M among Escherichia coli isolates from livestock and other animals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 82: 148–53. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Yang X, Liu X, Xu Y et al. An IncB/O/K/Z conjugative plasmid encodes resistance to azithromycin and mediates transmission of virulence plasmid in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2022; 60: 106683. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Nusrin S, Asad A, Hayat S et al. Multiple mechanisms confer resistance to azithromycin in Shigella in Bangladesh: a comprehensive whole genome-based approach. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10: e0074122. 10.1128/spectrum.00741-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Barraud O, Ploy MC. Diversity of class 1 integron gene cassette rearrangements selected under antibiotic pressure. J Bacteriol 2015; 197: 2171–8. 10.1128/JB.02455-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Deng Y, Bao X, Ji L et al. Resistance integrons: class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2015; 14: 45. 10.1186/s12941-015-0100-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete whole genome sequences of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates had been deposited at GenBank under the accession ID listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical information and genomic characterization of 10 azithromycin-resistant NTS isolates
| Isolates | Date of isolation | Department | Salmonella serovar | ST | Vehicle of resistance genes | Resistance genesa | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR1 | 2020/7/31 | Physical Examination | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIX000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),floR,tet(A),aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR2 | 2021/10/5 | Oncology | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIW000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,floR,tet(A),mph(A),aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)Ib,aac(3)IId,catA2,sul1,sul2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR3 | 2021/7/26 | Pediatrics | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIV000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,mph(a),flor,tet(A),aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,catA2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR4 | 2021/12/4 | Dispensary | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIU000000000 |
| IncFII | qnrB6,aac(6′)-Ib-cr,bla TEM-1 ,bla CTX-M-24 ,floR,tet(A),mph(A),aac(3)-IId,aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(6′)-Iaa,ant(3″)-Ia,sul1,sul2,floR,catA2,arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16 | ||||||
| AR5 | 2020/7/20 | Physical Examination | London | 155 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIT000000000 |
| IncFIB | qnrB6, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),floR,tet(A),aph(6)-Id,aph(3″)-Ib,aac(3)-IId,sul1,sul2,catA2,aadA16,dfrA27,arr-3 | ||||||
| AR6 | 2020/9/9 | Physical Examination | Thompson | 26 | Chromosome | aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIS000000000 |
| IncC | qepA8,qnrS1,bla TEM-1 ,bla CMY-2 ,mph(A),dfrA12,aadA2,sul1,sul2,aph(3″)-Ib,aph(6)-Id,tet(A),floR | ||||||
| AR7 | 2021/7/28 | Paediatrics | Typhimurium | 34 | Chromosome | bla TEM-1 ,tet(B),sul2,aph(3')-Ib,aph(6)-Id,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIR000000000 |
| IncHI2 | qnrS1,bla CTX-M-55 ,bla LAP-2 ,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),ant(3″)-Ia,aac(3)-IId,lnu(F),dfrA14,aadA16,sul3 | ||||||
| IncHI1&IncR | arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16,sul1,floR | ||||||
| AR8 | 2021/9/25 | Paediatrics | Typhimurium | 34 | Chromosome | bla TEM-1 ,tet(B),sul2,aph(3″)-Ib,aph(6)-Id,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIQ000000000 |
| IncHI2 | qnrS1,bla CTX-M-55 ,bla LAP-2 ,bla TEM-1 ,mph(A),lnu(F),dfrA14,aadA16,sul3,arr-3,ant(3″)-Ia,aac(3)-IId | ||||||
| IncHI1&IncR | arr-3,dfrA27,aadA16,sul1,floR | ||||||
| AR9 | 2020/6/26 | Pediatrics | Saintpaul | 27 | Chromosome | floR,aac(6′)-Iaa | JAVAIP000000000 |
| IncHI2 |
qnrS1,bla
LAP-2
,bla
TEM-1
,bla
CTX-M-55
,mph(A),aph(3')-Ia,aph(6)-Id, floR,arr-2,dfrA14,tet(A) |
||||||
| AR10 | 2021/2/20 | Pediatrics | Rissen | 469 | Chromosome | qnrS1,bla TEM-1 ,sul2,floR,dfrA12,aadA2,cmlA1,aadA1,sul3,tet(A),tet(M),aac(6′)-Iaa,ant(3″)-Ia | JAVAIO000000000 |
| IncI1 | bla CTX-M-123 ,mph(A),fosA3 |
aAzithromycin-resistant gene is indicated in bold.




