Abstract
Phage viruses shape the evolution and virulence of their bacterial hosts. The Salmonella enterica genome encodes several stress-inducible prophages. The Gifsy-1 prophage terminase protein, whose canonical function is to process phage DNA for packaging in the virus head, unexpectedly acts as a transfer ribonuclease (tRNase) under oxidative stress, cleaving the anticodon loop of tRNALeu. The ensuing RNA fragmentation compromises bacterial translation, intracellular survival, and recovery from oxidative stress in the vertebrate host. S. enterica adapts to this transfer RNA (tRNA) fragmentation by transcribing the RNA repair Rtc system. The counterintuitive translational arrest provided by tRNA cleavage may subvert prophage mobilization and give the host an opportunity for repair as a way of maintaining bacterial genome integrity and ultimately survival in animals.
Oxidative stress imposes tremendous selective pressures on all domains of life. Intracellular bacterial pathogens, such as S. enterica, that reside in effector cells of the mammalian innate immune system, are exposed to high concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) synthesized by the respiratory burst of the phagocyte NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) oxidase (1). The cytotoxic concentrations of ROS produced by the respiratory burst damage nucleotides, metal cofactors, and sulfur-containing amino acids (2). Oxidation of biosynthetic enzymes induces functional auxotrophies for aromatic and branched-chain amino acids (3, 4). The resulting drops in amino acids are followed by a surplus of deacylated transfer RNAs (tRNAs) that trigger an adaptation in bacteria commonly known as the stringent response (5–7). The combination of a shrinking pool of charged tRNAs together with the repression of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and tRNA genes undermines the translational capacity of phylogenetically diverse microorganisms undergoing the stringent response during periods of oxidative stress. In this study, we describe a lysogenic prophage that represses translation in Salmonella exposed to oxidative stress generated by the phagocyte NADPH oxidase through the moonlighting transfer ribonuclease (tRNase) function of a deoxyribonuclease (DNase) whose canonical role is viral-genome processing and capsid packaging.
Results
Translational halts in S. enterica after oxidative stress
To measure de novo translation in S. enterica in vitro in response to oxidative stress generated by application of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), we used a Western blot version of SUnSET (surface sensing of translation) (8). S. enterica experienced a substantial (P < 0.0001) inhibition of de novo protein synthesis upon exposure to 400 μM H2O2 (Fig. 1, A and B). Under the high density of bacterial cultures used in these experiments, 400 μM H2O2 did not affect bacterial viability (Fig. 1C), indicating that S. enterica can tolerate moderate levels of peroxide stress by repressing translation. S. enterica resumed translation 90 min after exposure to H2O2 (Fig. 1,D and E).
To identify responses that may underlie recovery of translational activity during oxidative stress, we investigated the genome-wide transcriptional responses of S. enterica exposed to H2O2. Hierarchical clustering analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data revealed that 497 and 569 genes were up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively, in H2O2-treated S. enterica compared with untreated controls (fig. S1A) [false discovery rate (FDR) P value < 0.05; tables S1 to S4]. This analysis showed transcriptional up-regulation of katG, trxC, and dps of the OxyR regulon, of mntH and sitABCD involved in manganese transport, and of genes encoding the Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 type III secretion system, glycolysis, iron acquisition, and [Fe-S] repair. By contrast, genes encoding oxidative phosphorylation; ribosomal proteins; or the biosynthesis of lipids, amino acids, and aminoacyl tRNAs were down-regulated. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed the up-regulation of katG and sufABC genes and the down-regulation of oxidative phosphorylation genes (fig. S1, B and C).
The patterns of gene expression that we found are consistent with the idea that S. enterica adapts to oxidative stress by up-regulating antioxidant defenses, while favoring overflow metabolism and undergoing the stringent response (2, 5, 9). We also noted that the rsr-yrlBA-rtcBA operon, which mediates repair of fragmented RNA molecules, was up-regulated in H2O2-treated S. enterica (Fig. 1F and fig. S1D). The rtc operon encodes for the RNA cyclase RtcA, the RNA ligase RtcB, and the σ54 transcriptional activator RtcR (10). RtcA converts 3′ and 5′-phosphate RNA fragments to a 2′, 3′- cyclic phosphate intermediate (11), which serves asa substrate for the phosphodiesterase RtcB. The RtcB protein also catalyzes the GTP-driven ligation of 3′-phosphate and 5′-hydroxyl RNA fragments (12, 13). The activation of rtc genes during oxidative stress prompted us to explore the role of this operon in adaptation of S. enterica to the inhibition of de novo protein synthesis through oxidative stress.
Role of the RNA repair Rtc system during oxidative stress
We tested the capacity of S. enterica rtcBA and rtcR deletion mutants to synthesize protein after exposure to H2O2. As reported above, wild-type (WT) S. enterica recovered de novo protein synthesis after 90 min of H2O2 treatment. In comparison, the ΔrtcBA and ΔrtcR isogenic controls undergoing oxidative stress showed delayed (P < 0.01) de novo protein translation during the recovery phase (Fig. 2, A and B, and fig. S2, A to C). These data indicate that the RNA repair Rtc system plays a role in the adaptation of S. enterica to translational halts that occur during oxidative stress.
Coinciding with rtcB gene transcription (fig. S3A), the addition of H2O2 to WT S. enterica resulted in fragmentation of tRNATyr and tRNALeuPQTV (Fig. 2, C and D), so we explored how the Rtc system aids the recovery of de novo translation through RNA repair (10). Further analysis revealed that S. enterica undergoing oxidative stress specifically experienced fragmentation of all major leucine tRNA isoacceptors tRNALeuPQTV, tRNALeuX, and tRNALeuZ, but not tRNAGln, tRNAHis, or tRNAMet (fig. S3B). S. enterica ΔrtcBA and ΔrtcR mutants experienced higher levels of tRNALeu and tRNATyr fragmentation after H2O2 treatment than did WT controls (Fig. 2C and fig. S3C). Expression of the rtcBA operon in trans reversed the abnormally high tRNALeuPQTV fragmentation of ΔrtcBA S. enterica after H2O2 treatment (fig. S3D). Sequencing of 3′ RACE products of tRNALeuPQTV and tRNALeuW fragments recovered from H2O2-treated S. enterica identified cleavage at positions U34 and G37 of the anticodon loop (Fig. 2E and fig. S3E).
WT and rtc S. enterica mutants were equally susceptible to the bacteriostatic activity of H2O2 (fig. S4A); however, compared with WT controls, a higher percentage (P < 0.0001) of ΔrtcR and ΔrtcBA S. enterica mutants were killed by H2O2 (Fig. 2F and fig. S4B). The ΔrtcBA mutant became resistant to H2O2 killing upon complementation with the rtcBA operon (fig. S4C). These data indicate that the RNA repair Rtc system protects S. enterica from the bactericidal effects of H2O2. The rtc S. enterica mutants were hypersusceptible to ROS produced by the respiratory burst of bone marrow–derived macrophages (Fig. 2G and fig. S4D). The ΔrtcBA S. enterica mutant was also attenuated in C57BL/6 mice, as measured by both a decreased competitive index when receiving intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation with WT controls (Fig. 2H) and the reduced burden and number of microabscesses recorded in infected livers (Fig. 2I) and spleens (fig. S4E) when inoculated as a single culture in mice. The ΔrtcBA mutant was also attenuated in a streptomycin-treated oral model of S. enterica infection (fig. S4F). The ΔrtcBA S. enterica strain was as fit as WT S. enterica in Cybb−/− mice lacking the catalytic gp91phox subunit of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (Fig. 2, H and I, and fig. S4E). Cumulatively, these experiments show that the RNA repair Rtc system assists S. enterica to adapt to ROS cytotoxicity in macrophages and mice.
tRNA fragmentation after SOS induction of a temperate prophage
We sought the molecular mechanism underlying the cleavage of tRNAs in S. enterica after H2O2 treatment. Gene expression in S. enterica exposed to H2O2 showed that the SOS response was activated (Fig. 3A) (10, 14). Thus, we examined tRNA fragmentation in a strain lacking the SOS recombinase RecA that facilitates DNA repair after oxidative damage. The ΔrecA S. enterica mutant did not accumulate 5′-tRNALeu fragments upon H2O2 treatment (Fig. 3B), indicating that cleavage of tRNALeu in S. enterica undergoing oxidative stress is induced by the SOS response. Transcription of RNA repair rtc genes was not activated in the ΔrecA mutant, probably because of the lack of tRNA fragments that are recognized by the RtcR regulatory protein (Fig. 3C). Together, these results indicate that the RNA repair Rtc system provides protective feedback to the tRNA fragmentation unleashed in response to ROS-mediated genotoxicity.
The transcriptional analysis showed that S. enterica undergoing oxidative stress also increased transcription of Gifsy-1 and Gifsy-3 prophage genes (Fig. 1F). As it appears that oxidative DNA damage activates prophage simultaneously with RNA repair (15), we investigated whether Gifsy prophage activation caused tRNA cleavage. A strain of S. enterica lacking all three Gifsy prophages failed to induce tRNALeu cleavage after exposure to H2O2 (Fig. 3D). Endoribonuclease activity was mapped to the Gifsy-1 prophage. Gifsy-1–deficient S. enterica failed to induce tRNALeu cleavage upon H2O2 treatment (Fig. 3E and fig. S5A) and sustained higher translation but lower rtcA transcription after H2O2 treatment than did WT bacteria (Fig. 3, F and G). Treatment of Salmonella with 5 mM H2O2 for 2 hours did not activate the Gifsy-1 lytic cycle as measured by the absence of plaque-forming particles in culture supernatants or by RT-PCR of circularized DNA from the prophage (fig. S5B). These findings suggest that the expression of the Gifsy-1 tRNase activity is not reliant on phage replication. Gifsy-1–deficient S. enterica were not only more resistant to H2O2 killing than were WT controls (Fig. 3H) but were also at a competitive advantage in C57BL/6 mice when tested in competition with WT S. enterica (Fig. 3I). The presence of the Gifsy-1 prophage reduced resistance of S. enterica to oxidative stress but attenuated S. enterica virulence in Cybb−/− mice lacking the phagocyte NADPH oxidase. Thus, in the context of oxidative stress created by the respiratory burst of phagocytic cells, the Gifsy-1 prophage sensitizes S. enterica to oxidative killing. However, the Gifsy-1 prophage provides advantages to Salmonella at times when phagocyte NADPH oxidase is not expressed, as evidenced by the disadvantage of the ΔGifsy-1 strain in Cybb−/− mice (Fig. 3I).
Cleavage of tRNA by Gifsy-1 terminase during oxidative stress
The data so far indicated the presence of a previously uncharacterized nuclease in the Gifsy-1 prophage that can target its bacterial host’s tRNA molecules. We initially focused on the STM14_3218–20 operon within the Gifsy-1 prophage, a locus that is associated with the activation of rtc gene transcription after antibiotic-mediated DNA damage (15) and that is present in Salmonella Typhimurium strain 14028s but absent in S. Typhimurium strains LT2 or SL1344. Northern blot analyses showed that H2O2 induced tRNALeu cleavage in S. Typhimurium strains LT2, SL1344—as well as in S. Typhimurium 14028s mutants bearing multiple- or single-gene deletions in the STM14_3218–20 operon—as efficiently as in the WT 14028s strain (fig. S5, C and D). Collectively, these findings suggest that the nuclease responsible for tRNA cleavage in H2O2-treated S. enterica maps to a locus encoded outside of the STM14_3218–20 operon. Neither the dinJ or yafQ genes encoded proximal to the rtc operon were required for H2O2-induced fragmentation of tRNALeu (fig. S5D), indicating that the RNase encoded in this putative toxin-antitoxin system was not involved.
Systematic mapping of the Gifsy-1 genome (Fig. 4A) associated a gene in the capsid- and DNA-packaging region with cleavage of S. enterica tRNALeu during oxidative stress (Fig. 4B and fig. S6, A and B). The terminase encoded in the Gifsy-1 gpA gene is the only determinant in the capsid- and DNA-packaging region that has canonical endonuclease activity. Terminases hydrolyze linear concatemers of double-stranded viral DNA into single genomes ready for packaging into mature virions. The combination of phylogenetic analysis and the AlphaFold structure of the C-terminal domain of the Gifsy-1 GpA revealed intriguing similarities between this terminase and colicin family members (Fig. 4C and fig. S6C), some of which are endoribonucleases with specificity against the anticodon loop of tRNA molecules (16). Deletion of the gpA gene from Gifsy-1 averted tRNALeu fragmentation after exposure of S. enterica to H2O2 (Fig. 4D), a phenotype that could be complemented with the gpA gene in trans (fig. S6D). Cumulatively, these findings support the role of Gifsy-1 terminase in tRNA cleavage after oxidative stress.
To further test the idea that the Gifsy-1 terminase has endoribonuclease activity, we expressed the GpA protein with an arabinose-inducible promoter. In the absence of H2O2, induction of the gpA gene in S. enterica did not result in fragmentation of tRNA (fig. S7A). However, heterologous expression of gpA simultaneously with the addition of 400 μM H2O2 resulted in the fragmentation of tRNALeu (Fig. 4E). These findings suggest that oxidative stress either promotes endoribonuclease activity in the GpA terminase or that the tRNA cleavage is the result of the synergistic actions of GpA with another factor induced by oxidative stress. In support of the former model, recombinant GpA treated with H2O2—but not GpA treated with dithiothreitol (DTT)—induced cleavage of tRNALeu in a reconstituted biochemical system (Fig. 4F and fig. S7B). The tRNase activity of the oxidized recombinant GpA was potentiated by the addition of ATP in the reactions (fig. S7C) and resulted in 3′-phosphate or 2′, 3′ cyclic phosphate and 5′-hydroxyl fragments amenable for RtcB repair (fig. S7D). The oxidized GpA protein retained the canonical DNase activity (fig. S7E). Reduced and oxidized recombinant GpA differentially migrated in non-reducing SDS gels (fig. S7F), indicating that the Gifsy-1 GpA terminase is redox active. Recombinant GpA preparations further purified by size-exclusion chromatography retained tRNase activity upon oxidation (fig. S7, G to I), demonstrating that the tRNase activity maps to GpA. Recombinant GpA cleaved tRNALeuPQTV at the G37 wobble position in the anticodon loop (Fig. 4G and fig. S7J). Our bioinformatic analysis of the projected AlphaFold structure of the C-terminal domain of GpA revealed a Walker A motif close to the predicted colicin tRNase domain (Fig. 4H). Mutagenesis of Lys497 and His481 in the Walker A motif and predicted tRNase domain, respectively, prevented cleavage of both tRNALeuPQTV and a DNA template containing the cosN site by the oxidized GpA protein (Fig. 4I and fig. S7, K to M). Hence, the oxidized form of the redox-sensitive GpA Gifsy-1 terminase can moonlight as a tRNase with specificity to the anticodon loop without losing its canonical DNase activity.
A strain of S. enterica lacking the Gifsy-1 gpA gene was hyperresistant to H2O2 and hypervirulent in C57BL/6 mice when tested in oral and systemic models of infection (Fig. 4, J and K, and fig. S8A). The expression of gpA in trans reversed the hypersusceptibility of the ΔgpA mutant to H2O2 (fig. S8B). Moreover, the presence of a functional gpA gene slowed the recovery of de novo protein translation after peroxide stress (fig. S8, C and D). These findings indicate that when acting as an RNAse, the prophage GpA protein predisposes S. enterica to oxidative stress generated in the innate host response.
Discussion
The pathogenesis of Vibrio cholerae, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, Shigella dysenteriae, or Clostridium botulinum is intimately linked to the toxins encoded within their temperate bacteriophages (17). The virulence of S. enterica has also been chiseled by the horizontal acquisition of prophages. The Gifsy-2 prophage promotes S. enterica virulence through vacuolar remodeling by an effector of the pathogenicity island-2 type III secretion system and the antioxidant properties of a Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (18, 19). In contrast to the archetypical lysogenic bacteriophages that provide virulence traits to their bacterial hosts, our investigations show that the Gifsy-1 prophage reduces fitness of S. enterica in the context of ROS-induced oxidative stress produced by phagocyte NADPH oxidase in mice. Thus, the redox-responsive terminase encoded in the capsid- and DNA-packaging region of the Gifsy-1 prophage gains endoribonuclease activity upon oxidation, sensitizing S. enterica to oxidative killing.
ROS damage almost every cogwheel of the translational machinery, including ribosomes, elongation factors, mRNA, tRNA, and tRNA synthetases [reviewed in (20)]. ROS oxidize cysteine and methionine residues in small (S17) and large (L7/L12, L14) ribosomal subunit proteins and damage ribonucleotides that can then be misincorporated into the transcriptome (21–23). Moreover, the [4Fe-4S] cluster of the ilvD-encoded dihydroxyacid dehydratase in the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids is especially vulnerable to the toxic effects of ROS (24–26). Cleavage of tRNALeu isoacceptors should be included in the mechanism by which oxidative stress negatively impacts translation in S. enterica. In contrast to the direct damage caused by ROS to ribosomes, biosynthetic enzymes, and ribonucleotides, the cleavage of tRNA under oxidative stress is an indirect result of the SOS-mediated expression of the Gifsy-1 terminase. Because about 20% of all codons in the genome of S. enterica encode for leucine residues, the concerted effects of oxidative stress on dehydroxyacid dehydratase and the tRNALeu cleavage mediated by Gifsy-1 terminase will have a profound effect on the nascent proteome (fig. S8).
The importance of the RNA repair Rtc system in resistance of S. enterica to the phagocyte NADPH oxidase indicates that this intracellular pathogen benefits from recycling damaged tRNA. Given the complex modifications involved in maturation of tRNAs (27), with most concentrated at the wobble position of the anticodon stem loop, de novo tRNA generation during oxidative stress must be taxing to an already energy- and resource-constrained cell. Recycling of damaged tRNA molecules becomes critical in the resistance of S. enterica to oxidative stress as shown by the Cybb-dependent attenuation of rtc mutants.
Why would a pathogen maintain an apparently debilitating locus within its genome? A possible answer to this paradox might lie in the fact that prokaryotic cells couple transcription and translation. The induction of Gifsy-1–mediated tRNA cleavage through the SOS response in S. enterica suggests that the observed halts in translation are caused by double-stranded DNA damage. The concerted inhibition of leucine biosynthesis and cleavage of tRNALeu must slow ribosomes through the nascent transcript. Decelerating ribosomes permits backtracking of RNA polymerase (28), which would enable access of repair enzymes to DNA lesions (29). Therefore, Gifsy-1–mediated inhibition of translation in H2O2-treated S. enterica may help maintain the integrity of the genome. In this context, S. enterica may hijack host cell–derived ROS to activate a lysogenic phage determinant that halts bacterial translation and growth during intense periods of oxidative stress, providing opportunities for repair and survival. In addition, the moonlighting tRNase function of GpA precludes phage-genome processing and capsid maturation, protecting the bacterial host from the lytic cycle at times of exposure to oxidative stress exerted by the innate immune response.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. Jones-Carson for kindly providing the mice. We thank J. Hesselberth for technical discussions on tRNA Northern blotting and for helpful discussions with the manuscript. We thank H. V. Batra for valuable discussions on protein expression and purification. We also thank A. Margolis for comments on the manuscript, and we thank the Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Shared Resource Facility, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, for protein identification.
Funding:
This work was supported by VA Merit Grants BX0002073 and IK6BX005384 and by NIH grants R01AI54959 and R01AI136520. M.M. was funded in part by NIH grant R03AI139557.
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability:
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or in the supplementary materials. RNA-seq data are available in the GEO database under accession no. GSE203342. Bacterial cultures and plasmids generated in the study are available upon request to the corresponding author. All the data and unprocessed images utilized to draw figures in the manuscript are available at Dryad (31).
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Mastroeni P. et al. , J. Exp. Med 192, 237–248 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fang FC, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2, 820–832 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jang S, Imlay JA, J. Biol. Chem 282, 929–937 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ezraty B, Gennaris A, Barras F, Collet JF, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 15, 385–396 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim JS et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 115, E11780–E11789 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leiva LE et al. , Front. Genet 11, 856 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fritsch VN et al. , Free Radic. Biol. Med 161, 351–364 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goodman CA, Hornberger TA, Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev 41, 107–115 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chakraborty S. et al. , Nat. Commun 11, 1783 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hughes KJ, Chen X, Burroughs AM, Aravind L, Wolin SL, Cell Rep. 33, 108527 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Das U, Shuman S, RNA 19, 1355–1362 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Manwar MR et al. , Sci. China Life Sci. 63, 251–258 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Temmel H. et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 4708–4721 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Juan CA, de la Lastra J. M. Pérez, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E, Int. J. Mol. Sci 22, 4642 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kurasz JE et al. , J. Bacteriol 205, e0026222 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tomita K, Ogawa T, Uozumi T, Watanabe K, Masaki H, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 97, 8278–8283 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wagner PL, Waldor MK, Infect. Immun 70, 3985–3993 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Groote MA et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 94, 13997–14001 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ho TD et al. , J. Bacteriol 184, 5234–5239 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fasnacht M, Polacek N, Front. Mol. Biosci 8, 671037 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shcherbik N, Pestov DG, Cells 8, 1379 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Simms CL, Hudson BH, Mosior JW, Rangwala AS, Zaher HS, Cell Rep. 9, 1256–1264 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leichert LI et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 105, 8197–8202 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Flint DH, Tuminello JF, Emptage MH, J. Biol. Chem 268, 22369–22376 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Macomber L, Imlay JA, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 106, 8344–8349 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang L. et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116, 14368–14373 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.de Crécy-Lagard V, Jaroch M, Trends Microbiol. 29, 41–53 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Proshkin S, Rahmouni AR, Mironov A, Nudler E, Science 328, 504–508 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bharati BK et al. , Nature 604, 152–159 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kant S. et al. , PLOS Biol. 21, e3002051 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Uppalapati S. et al. , Data from: Prophage terminase with tRNase activity sensitizes S. enterica to oxidative stress, Dryad (2024); 10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0knt. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or in the supplementary materials. RNA-seq data are available in the GEO database under accession no. GSE203342. Bacterial cultures and plasmids generated in the study are available upon request to the corresponding author. All the data and unprocessed images utilized to draw figures in the manuscript are available at Dryad (31).