Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1984 Dec 1;224(2):591–600. doi: 10.1042/bj2240591

Interactions of sulphide and other ligands with cytochrome c oxidase. An electron-paramagnetic-resonance study.

B C Hill, T C Woon, P Nicholls, J Peterson, C Greenwood, A J Thomson
PMCID: PMC1144469  PMID: 6097224

Abstract

The effect of sulphide on resting oxidized cytochrome c oxidase was studied by both e.p.r. and optical-absorption spectroscopy. Excess sulphide causes some reduction of cytochrome a, CuA and CuB, and the formation of the cytochrome a3-SH complex after about 1 min. After several hours in the presence of excess sulphide only the e.p.r. signals due to low-spin ferricytochrome a3-SH persist, giving a partially reduced species. Re-oxidation of this partially reduced sulphide-bound enzyme by ferricyanide makes all of the metal centres except CuB detectable by e.p.r. We conclude that sulphide has reduced and binds to CuB as well as to ferricytochrome a3. Sulphide binding to cuprous CuB may raise its mid-point potential and make re-oxidation difficult. Addition of reductant (ascorbate + NNN'N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine) and sulphide together to the oxidized resting enzyme produces a species in which cytochrome a and CuA are nearly completely reduced and cytochrome a3 is e.p.r.-detectable as approx. 80% of one haem in the low-spin sulphide-bound complex. The g = 12 signal of this partially reduced derivative is almost unchanged in magnitude relative to that of the resting enzyme; this suggests that the g = 12 signal may arise from less than 20% of the enzyme and that it may be relatively unreactive to both ligation and reduction. Such a reactivity pattern of the g = 12 form of the oxidase is also demonstrated with the ligands F- and NO, which are thought to bind to cytochrome a3 and CuB respectively.

Full text

PDF
591

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aasa R., Albracht P. J., Falk K. E., Lanne B., Vänngard T. EPR signals from cytochrome c oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Feb 13;422(2):260–272. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(76)90137-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boelens R., Rademaker H., Pel R., Wever R. EPR studies of the photodissociation reactions of cytochrome c oxidase-nitric oxide complexes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Jan 20;679(1):84–94. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(82)90258-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brudvig G. W., Stevens T. H., Morse R. H., Chan S. I. Conformations of oxidized cytochrome c oxidase. Biochemistry. 1981 Jun 23;20(13):3912–3921. doi: 10.1021/bi00516a039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenaway F. T., Chan S. H., Vincow G. An EPR study of the lineshape of copper in cytochrome c oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Jan 25;490(1):62–78. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(77)90106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartzell C. R., Beinert H. Components of cytochrome c oxidase detectable by EPR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Dec 19;368(3):318–338. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90178-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson M. K., Eglinton D. G., Gooding P. E., Greenwood C., Thomson A. J. Characterization of the partially reduced cyanide-inhibited derivative of cytochrome c oxidase by optical, electron-paramagnetic-resonance and magnetic-circular-dichroism spectroscopy. Biochem J. 1981 Mar 1;193(3):699–708. doi: 10.1042/bj1930699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicholls P., Kim J. K. Oxidation of sulphide by cytochrome aa3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Sep 14;637(2):312–320. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(81)90170-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nicholls P., Kim J. K. Sulphide as an inhibitor and electron donor for the cytochrome c oxidase system. Can J Biochem. 1982 Jun;60(6):613–623. doi: 10.1139/o82-076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicholls P. The effect of sulphide on cytochrome aa3. Isosteric and allosteric shifts of the reduced alpha-peak. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jul 8;396(1):24–35. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90186-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seiter C. H., Angelos S. G. Cytochrome oxidase: an alternative model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):1806–1808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomson A. J., Johnson M. K., Greenwood C., Gooding P. E. A study of the magnetic properties of haem a3 in cytochrome c oxidase by using magnetic-circular-dichroism spectroscopy. Biochem J. 1981 Mar 1;193(3):687–697. doi: 10.1042/bj1930687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Van Gelder B. F., Beinert H. Studies of the heme components of cytochrome c oxidase by EPR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Sep 16;189(1):1–24. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(69)90219-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wever R., van GELDER B. F., Dervartanian D. V. Biochemical and biophysical studies on cytochrome c oxidase. XX. Reaction with sulphide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 May 15;387(2):189–193. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson M. T., Jensen P., Aasa R., Malmström B. G., Vänngård T. An investigation by e.p.r. and optical spectroscopy of cytochrome oxidase during turnover. Biochem J. 1982 May 1;203(2):483–492. doi: 10.1042/bj2030483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. YONETANI T. Studies on cytochrome oxidase. I. Absolute and difference absorption spectra. J Biol Chem. 1960 Mar;235:845–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES