ABSTRACT
Introduction
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a popular surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its favorable oncological and functional outcomes, as well as lower morbidity. In cases of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) is recommended as an adjunct to RARP ( 1 – 3 ). Despite its benefits, PLND can lead to surgical complications, with postoperative lymphocele formation being the most common. Most postoperative lymphoceles are clinically insignificant with variable incidence, reaching up to 60% of cases 4. However, a small percentage of patients 2-8% may experience symptomatic lymphoceles (SL), which can cause significant morbidity ( 4 , 5 ).
Surgical technique
We perform our RARP technique with our standard approach in all patients ( 6 ). After vesicourethral anastomosis a modified PF created to prevent symptomatic lymphocele. We start by suturing the peritoneal fold on the right side, medially to the vas deferens, followed by a similar stitch on the left side to approximate the edges in the midline. A running suture bunches the bladder peritoneum from both sides, passing through the pubic bone periosteum to secure it in place ( 7 ). This approach keeps the lateral pelvic gutters open for lymphatic drainage, while allowing fluid drainage from the true pelvis into the abdomen. A pelvic ultrasound was done for all patients at 6 weeks post operative, and additional clinical follow-up was carried out at 3 months following surgery.
Considerations
We have demonstrated a modified technique of peritoneal flap (PBFB) with an initial decrease in postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles, the technique is feasible, safe, does not add significant morbidity, and does not require a learning curve.
Available at: http://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/video-section/20240278_Patel_et_al
Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50 (Video #9): 657-8
REFERENCES
- 1.Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, Chen RC, Crispino T, Fontanarosa J, et al. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options. J Urol . 2018;199:683–690. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH, Graefen M, Heidenreich A, Karnes JR, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol . 2009;55:1251–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alfano CG, Moschovas MC, Montagne V, Soto I, Porter J, Patel V, et al. Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol . 2023;49:211–220. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Haese A, Heidenreich A, Menon M, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol . 2014;65:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zorn KC, Katz MH, Bernstein A, Shikanov SA, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology . 2009;74:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moschovas MC, Patel V. Nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: how I do it after 15.000 cases. Int Braz J Urol . 2022;48:369–370. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.99.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gamal A, Moschovas MC, Jaber AR, Saikali S, Sandri M, Patel E, et al. Peritoneal Flap Following Lymph Node Dissection in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel "Bunching" Technique. Cancers (Basel) . 2024;16:1547–1547. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]