Abstract
Sensory abnormalities are observed in ~90% of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. GluN2B, an NMDA receptor subunit that regulates long-term depression and circuit refinement during brain development, has been strongly implicated in ASD, but whether GRIN2B mutations lead to sensory abnormalities remains unclear. Here, we report that Grin2b-mutant mice show behavioral sensory hypersensitivity and brain hyperconnectivity associated with the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Grin2b-mutant mice with a patient-derived C456Y mutation (Grin2bC456Y/+) show sensory hypersensitivity to mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimuli through supraspinal mechanisms. c-fos and functional magnetic resonance imaging indicate that the ACC is hyperactive and hyperconnected with other brain regions under baseline and stimulation conditions. ACC pyramidal neurons show increased excitatory synaptic transmission. Chemogenetic inhibition of ACC pyramidal neurons normalizes ACC hyperconnectivity and sensory hypersensitivity. These results suggest that GluN2B critically regulates ASD-related cortical connectivity and sensory brain functions.
Subject terms: Neuroscience, Autism spectrum disorders
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD), characterized by social deficits and repetitive behaviors, also involve sensory abnormalities in ~90% of cases, which could be causally associated with anxiety, social dysfunctions, and repetitive behaviors [1–6]. Increased sensory sensitivity in ASD would evoke enhanced pain perception and responses [7–10], but the underlying neural mechanisms are poorly understood. Previous studies on mouse models of ASD have provided valuable mechanistic insights into the sensory abnormalities [1, 11–20], which involve abnormalities in the peripheral and central nervous systems.
Examples of peripheral deficits include impaired presynaptic function in peripheral somatosensory neurons of Mecp2 and Gabarb3-mutant mice [12, 16, 21], impaired TRPV1 function in dorsal root ganglia neurons of Shank3-mutant mice with impaired heat hyperalgesia [14], and impaired Kv1 potassium channel function in hyperexcitable dorsal root ganglia neurons of Cntnap2-mutant mice with sensory hypersensitivity [17]. Examples of central deficits include GABA neuronal deficits in the somatosensory cortex of Shank3-mutant mice with sensory hypersensitivity [11] and decreased excitatory synaptic transmission in somatosensory cortical pyramidal neurons of Syngap1-mutant mice with sensory hyposensitivity [13]. However, little is known about whether there are contributions from additional cortical areas, such as the pain-related anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and relevant connectivity. In addition, the synaptic mechanisms underlying the sensory abnormalities remain largely unclear [13].
GRIN2B encodes the GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), and its mutations have been implicated in various brain disorders, including ASD, developmental delay, intellectual disability, epileptic encephalopathy, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder [22–37]. Functionally, GluN2B-containing NMDARs are known to regulate various aspects of brain development and functions by modulating excitatory synapse development and synaptic plasticity, including long-term depression (LTD) [38–41]. GluN2B mutations in mice lead to neurodevelopmental, synaptic, and learning and memory phenotypes, including neonatal lethality, suppressed LTD, and spatial/working memory deficits [42–47]. However, it remains unclear whether GluN2B dysfunction leads to abnormal neural connectivity and whether such impairments could be associated with the pathophysiology of GRIN2B-related brain disorders. More recently, we reported that mice carrying a patient-derived C456Y mutation [24] (Grin2bC456Y/+ mice) display suppressed LTD associated with anxiety-related abnormalities [48]. These phenotypes, observed at juvenile and adult stages, are improved by chronic pharmacological stimulation of NMDAR function during early postnatal stages [48], suggesting that early correction of NMDAR dysfunction has long-lasting effects.
In the present study, we show that Grin2bC456Y/+ mice display behavioral sensory hypersensitivities, which involve supraspinal mechanisms, ACC hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity, and enhanced ACC neuronal excitatory synaptic transmission. Chemogenetic suppression normalizes the hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the mutant ACC neurons and the behavioral hypersensitivity of the mutant mice. These results suggest that GluN2B critically regulates cortical connectivity and sensory brain functions.
Methods
Animals
The Grin2bC456Y/+ mice were as described previously [48]. To genotype these mice, the following primer set was used: forward, ACGACTCTTTGTGGAGGAGGG; reverse, CCATATCACAGCTTACTTCAATGT. For Cdx2-Cre;Grin2bfl/+ mice, Grin2bfl/+ mice with floxed Grin2b exon 5 were generated by Biocytogen. These mice were genotyped using the following primers: forward, GGTTTTGGGGGTCGGAGGAAGAAAT; reverse, CTCCCTGTCCTTTTGAGGGAGAAGC. The Grin2bfl/+ mice were crossed with CDX2P-NLS-Cre mice (JAX #009350), which express a nuclear-localized Cre recombinase under the control of a ~9.5-kb promoter and an upstream sequence element in the human CDX2 gene. The Cre transgene is expressed in all embryonic tissues caudal to the cervical spinal segment 2 during development [21, 49]. Cdx2-Cre;Grin2bfl/+ mice were genotyped using the following PCR primer sets: Cdx2-control-forward, CAAATGTTGCTTGTCTGGTG; Cdx2-control-reverse, GTCAGTCGAGTGCACAGTTT; Cdx2-mutant-forward, AGGAGCCAGCGGAGCAC; Cdx2-mutant-reverse, ACATGTCCATCAGGTTCTTGC. To selectively label ACC pyramidal neurons in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, we generated CaMKII-Cre;Ai9;Grin2bC456Y/+ mice by crossing CaMKII-Cre;Grin2bC456Y/+ or CaMKII-Cre;Grin2b+/+ mice with Ai9 mice (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J, JAX#007909). The resulting triple-mutant mice were genotype using the following primers: Cre-forward, GATCTCCGGTATTGAAACTCCAAC; Cre-reverse: GCTAAACATGCTTCATCGTCGG. Mice were bred in-house and maintained with standard laboratory chow and water in ventilated cages in a temperature/humidity-controlled facility under a 12-h dark/light cycle according to the requirements of Animal Research at KAIST. All behavior, electrophysiology, and fMRI experiments were conducted using adult male mice aged 8 to 11 weeks. All procedures were approved by the Committees of Animal Research at KAIST (KA2020-90).
Behavioral assays
All sensory behavioral experiments were conducted during the light phase of the circadian cycle unless stated otherwise. The investigators performing the experiments were blind to the mouse genotype. The mice were placed in the behavior room at least 30 min before the test to allow acclimation to the experimental apparatus. All behavioral experiments, except for those assessing anxiety behavior (i.e., the light–dark test or elevated plus maze test), were conducted under the lighting condition of ~100 lux. Additional information on behavioral tests is available in Supplementary Information.
c-fos staining
Ninety min after entering the fear chamber with electric foot shocks (Experimental group) or without any electric foot shock (Control group), mouse brains were extracted, perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde, and post-fixed overnight. After post-fixation, brains were embedded into 3% phosphate-buffer saline (PBS)-agarose gel and serially sliced (50 μm) using vibratome (VT1200s, Leica). Slides were washed and blocked in 5% normal goat serum in PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature and incubated in the primary antibody against c-fos (CS-2250s, Cell signaling) and NeuN (MAB377, Millipore) overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were detected by incubating with the secondary antibody (anti-mouse Alexa488 for NeuN Ab, anti-rabbit Alexa 594 for c-fos Ab) at room temperature for 2 h. DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, 1:10,000) was co-administered with secondary antibodies. After secondary antibody staining, slices were mounted and imaged using a slide scanning microscope (Axio Scan.Z1). The number of c-fos and NeuN particles was automatically quantified using the AMaSiNe program [50].
Electrophysiology
Ex-vivo electrophysiological experiments were performed to evaluate synaptic transmission and intrinsic excitability. Additional information on electrophysiology is available in Supplementary Information.
Virus reagents
All viruses were purchased from Addgene. The pAAV-CaMKIIa-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry for CNO-induced neuronal silencing was a gift from Dr. Bryan Roth (Addgene viral prep #50476-AAV5), and the pAAV-CaMKIIa-mCherry was a gift from Dr. Karl Deisseroth (Addgene viral prep #114469-AAV5). Viruses were used for all chemogenetic experiments.
Stereotactic surgeries
All stereotactic surgeries were conducted under aseptic condition and isoflurane-based anesthesia (4.5%, v/v; induction, 1%, v/v; maintenance). Viruses were injected into ACC or S1 bilaterally at appropriate stereotaxic coordinates [anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) relative to bregma; dorsal-ventral (DV) relative to brain surface at target coordinate]; +0.8 mm AP, ±0.3 mm ML, –1.3 mm DV for ACC and –0.3 mm AP, ±1.9 mm ML, –0.9 mm DV for S1. Viruses were infused at a rate of 100 nl/min (total 500 nl) using NanoFil Needle (33G, blunt, NF33BL-2, WPI) connected to a Hamilton syringe by tubing backfilled with mineral oil. The needle was slowly removed 8 min after infusion.
Chemogenetic rescue of sensory hypersensitivity
At 3–4 weeks after stereotactic surgery, the mice were subjected to behavioral experiments, such as the open field test, von Frey test, hot-plate test, thermal place-preference test, and electric foot-shock test. At 30 min before the behavioral tests, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO, 5 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally. After behavioral experiments, mouse brains were extracted, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and assessed to confirm virus expression and targeting.
Early chronic treatment of d-cycloserine
d-cycloserine/DCS (Sigma) was dissolved in 0.1% saccharin-based drinking water at the concentration of 80 mg/ml. DCS was orally administered at a dose of 40 mg/kg twice a day during postnatal days 7–16, as described previously [48].
Functional MRI-animal preparation and stimulation
A total of 75 mice (~30 g, 8–11 weeks old, male) were used in four different studies: (1) 11 heterozygous mutant (HT, Grin2bC456Y/+) and 10 wild-type (WT) mice for whisker stimulation-evoked fMRI to determine which brain regions exhibit abnormal functional activity in the mutant mice, (2) 11 HT and 11 WT mice with chemogenetic viral transfection for whisker stimulation-evoked fMRI before and after intraperitoneal injection of CNO dissolved in DMSO to investigate the effects of chemogenetic silencing of ACC, (3) 7 HT and 7 WT mice with chemogenetic viral transfection for whisker stimulation-evoked fMRI before and after DMSO injection as control for the CNO effects, and (4) 9 HT and 9 WT mice for whisker stimulation-evoked fMRI before and after CNO injection solely to examine the effect of chemogenetic actuators. For somatosensory activation, the electrical stimulation was given to the right whisker pad at 4 Hz with a pulse width of 0.5 ms and a current intensity of 0.9 mA (performed using Master 9; World Precision Instruments) via a customized square electrode pad (2 × 2 mm2), which has two anodes and one cathode.
The animals were initially induced with 2–4% isoflurane. Once induced, each mouse was carefully positioned on a customized cradle equipped with two ear plugs, a bite bar, and a mask for the duration of the experiment. Following the completion of the experimental setup, isoflurane administration was discontinued. All MRI experiments were conducted under anesthesia, which was maintained by continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.05 mg/kg/h) through the tail vein with 0.3% isoflurane, while allowing the mice to self-breathe [51]. During fMRI experiments, heart rate and motion-sensitive respiration signals were continuously measured using a physiological monitoring system (Model 1030, Small Animal Instruments Inc) along with body temperature being maintained at 37 ± 0.5 oC with a warm-water heating system via a rectal thermometer.
Functional MRI-MRI experiments
All MRI experiments were performed on a 15.2 Tesla MRI system (Bruker BioSpec) with an actively shielded 6-cm diameter gradient operating with a maximum strength of 100 G/cm and a rise time of 110 μs. The animal brain was positioned as close to the iso-center of the magnet, and a 15-mm inner diameter (ID) customized surface coil used for RF transmission and reception was centered over the imaging volume of interest. The field homogeneity was optimized using both global and local shimming on the ellipsoidal volume covering the cerebrum (MAPSHIM, ParaVision 6, Bruker BioSpin). Anatomical images were acquired using the fast low angle shot magnetic resonance imaging (FLASH) sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR)/ echo time (TE) = 384/3.3 ms, flip angle (FA) = 45°, field of view (FOV) = 15.8 × 7.9 mm2, matrix = 256 × 128, in-plane resolution = 62 × 62 μm2, slice thickness = 500 μm, contiguous 20 coronal slices without gap, and number of excitations (NEX) = 8. These anatomical images were used for the spatial normalization to a common brain space. Functional data were acquired using single-shot gradient echo (GE) echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE = 1000/11.5 ms, FA = 50°, FOV = 15.8 × 7.65 mm2, matrix = 120 × 58, in-plane resolution = 132 × 132 μm2, slice thickness = 500 μm, and contiguous 20 coronal slices without gap.
In each mouse, somatosensory-evoked fMRI and resting-state (rs)-fMRI were acquired. Each somatosensory-evoked fMRI trial consisted of a 30-s pre-stimulus, 20-s stimulus, 30-s inter-stimulus, 20-s another stimulus, and finally 30-s post-stimulus period. For fMRI of mice with chemogenetic actuators, somatosensory-evoked fMRI was conducted before and 10 min after intraperitoneal injection of CNO or DMSO. The duration of fMRI scans after injection of CNO or DMSO was less than 1.5 h. For the signal averaging, 10 to 15 fMRI trials were performed for each stimulus condition. Following the evoked fMRI scans, an additional 10-min rs-fMRI scan was obtained in some animals.
Functional MRI-data analysis
All MRI data were analyzed using the Analysis of Functional Neuroimages package (AFNI), FMRIB Software Library (FSL), Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs), and Matlab codes (The Mathworks).
Somatosensory-evoked fMRI
The fMRI activation maps for individual animals were generated using preprocessing and general linear model (GLM) analysis. The fMRI data processing was previously described in detail [52, 53]. First, the preprocessing pipeline in functional data included slice timing correction, image realignment for minor head motions during intra- and inter-scans, linear signal detrending for drift removal, and time-course normalization by the average of the baseline period. All repeated fMRI trials per stimulus condition were averaged to improve the signal to noise ratio. Second, functional data was co-registered to an anatomic image, and then spatially normalized onto the Allen moue brain atlas using deformation parameters obtained between anatomic image and mouse brain atlas. Third, the functional data normalized in a common space were smoothed with a Gaussian filter of 0.2 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM). The fMRI maps of the individual animal were calculated by a GLM analysis using a stimulus paradigm convolved with dexmedetomidine/isoflurane specific-hemodynamic response function [51]. The group-averaged maps were obtained by one sample t-test using non-parametric permutation with a significance at threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE)-corrected p < 0.01. To evaluate how functional activations differed between HT and WT mice, Student’s t-test was also conducted at a significance level of TFCE-corrected p < 0.01.
Quantitative ROI analysis
To estimate the regional specificity of sensory-evoked fMRI responses between HT and WT mice, ten different regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to somatosensory active sites were defined on Allen mouse brain atlas: anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), primary and secondary motor cortex (M1, M2), primary somatosensory cortex of barrel field (S1BF), secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), ventral posterior thalamic nucleus (VP), posterior medial thalamic nucleus (PO), superior colliculus motor-related (SCm) and periaqueductal gray (PAG). The ROIs for ACC and PAG, which are centrally located in brain structure, include areas within both hemispheres. The S1BF ROIs were separated into contralateral and ipsilateral hemisphere to the stimulated whisker pad (cS1BF, iS1BF), whereas the other ROIs were defined as the contralateral region to the stimulus side.
For quantification, time courses were extracted from each ROI, and then percent signal changes over the stimulus duration were averaged. To compare functional signal changes between HT and WT mouse groups under the same experimental condition, a Student’s t-test was performed. Additionally, to identify the most aberrant region in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, the regions with statistically significant differences were used to apply the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection method [54] using the “fscmmr” function in Matlab. At each ROI, we assessed the relevance between percent changes of HT and WT groups and redundancy against other ROIs using mutual information. Subsequently, the importance of each ROI was scored by calculating the quotient of these relevance and redundancy measures. This methodology enabled us to rank ROIs for the classification of the two groups, selecting the region with the highest correlation between HT and WT groups while minimizing correlation with other ROIs. This fMRI-guided group classification was used to determine the target region for subsequent chemogenetic modulation. ROI-wise sensory stimulus-evoked fMRI signals before and after chemogenetic modulation were compared using a paired t-test.
Connectivity analysis
To investigate whether brain functional connectivity patterns are intrinsically aberrant in HT mice, we first classified functional resting-state networks (RSNs) using independent component analysis (ICA) decomposition. Preprocessing steps for rs-fMRI data were similar to those for evoked-fMRI analysis, including slice timing correction, image realignment, linear signal detrending, voxel-wise time course normalization, and spatial smoothing with a Gaussian kernel of 0.2 mm FWHM. To enhance the reliability of functional connectivity, three additional preprocessing steps were involved: de-spiking fMRI time courses, clearing data by regressing out 12 motion confounds (6 parameters + temporal derivatives), and bandpass filtering (0.01 < f < 0.3 Hz). In a common space, temporally concatenated group ICA was performed to infer RSNs using the Multivariate Exploratory Linear Decomposition into Independent Components (MELODIC), a part of FSL. The spatial dimensionality of the ICA decomposition was set to 20, with a threshold level of 0.5 for the alternative hypothesis tests. From the ICA-derived spatial maps, a total of 14 components were visually identified as plausible group-level RSNs based on a mouse brain atlas. The identified 14 networks mainly included the following areas: S1 of mouth and partial S2 (S1M + S2), retrosplenial cortex (RSC), S1BF, S1 of forelimb and partial S2 (S1FL + S2), M1 + M2, striatum dorsal region (STRd), visual cortex (VIS), ACC, hippocampus (HIP), auditory cortex and temporal association cortex (AUD+TEa), right superior colliculus sensory-related (Rt.SCs), left superior colliculus sensory-related (Lt.SCs), SCm, and hypothalamus (HY).
Time courses from each RSN were extracted from rsfMRI and evoked fMRI data in each animal using dual regression. Subsequently, functional connectivity matrices were constructed using Pearson correlation (r) for all pairs of 14 components in each experimental condition to compare the functional connectivity between HT and WT mice. The statistical difference in correlation z scores from Fisher’s r-to-z transformation for each pair between HT and WT mice was determined using a Student’s t-test.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad 9. Data with non-parametric distribution were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney test, and those with parametric distribution were analyzed by the Student’s t-test. If data were parametric but showed a significant difference in variance on the F-test, Welch’s correction was used. Multiple groups were compared using two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-hoc test.
Results
Grin2bC456Y/+ mice display somatosensory hypersensitivity through supraspinal mechanisms
To determine whether Grin2bC456Y/+ mice carrying the human C456Y mutation [24, 48] display somatosensory functional alterations, we subjected the mice to various sensory behavioral tests, including electronic von Frey, thermal place-preference, hot-plate, and electric foot-shock tests.
Grin2bC456Y/+ mice exhibited a lower threshold for mechanical stimuli in the electronic von Frey test, as compared with WT mice (Fig. 1a, b). Grin2bC456Y/+ mice also displayed thermal hypersensitivity, as shown by the decreased preference for a warm floor in the thermal place-preference test and decreased latency to withdrawal response in the hot-plate test (Fig. 1c, d). Lastly, Grin2bC456Y/+ mice displayed increased sensitivity to electric foot shocks, as shown by increased freezing responses during repeated foot shocks (Fig. 1e). These results suggest that Grin2bC456Y/+ mice are hypersensitive to mechanical, thermal, and electrical aversive somatosensory stimuli.
Given that Grin2b is expressed both in the brain and in non-brain peripheral neural tissues (spinal cord and peripheral neurons) [38, 55, 56], we restricted Grin2b deletion to non-brain neural tissues caudal to the cervical 2 spinal segment using the Cdx2-Cre mouse line (Fig. 1f; Supplementary Fig. 1a, b) [21, 49]. Interestingly, Cdx2-Cre;Grin2bfl/+ mice (exon 5 deletion) did not show altered behavioral sensitivity to mechanical, thermal, or electric stimuli (Fig. 1g–j). Furthermore, Cdx2-Cre;Grin2bfl/+ mice showed largely normal locomotor and anxiety-like behavior, except for a mild decrease in open-field locomotion (Supplementary Fig. 1c–k). These results suggest that Grin2b haploinsufficiency leads to somatosensory hypersensitivity through supraspinal mechanisms.
Grin2bC456Y/+ brain regions show stronger responses to sensory stimuli
To determine brain regions that abnormally respond to sensory stimuli in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, we combined c-fos imaging analyses with electric foot shocks (Fig. 2a). The results, which were quantified using the AMaSiNe program [50], indicated that foot shock-induced c-fos signals were increased in various brain regions of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 2b–d; Supplementary Fig. 2).
The regions exhibiting significant changes included the ACC, which is a pain-related brain region [57–59], as well as the somatosensory cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, habenula, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (Fig. 2d). In contrast, baseline c-fos signals were largely comparable in WT and Grin2bC456Y/+ brain regions (Supplementary Fig. 3).
We also performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which enables real-time and repetitive monitoring of sensory stimulus-induced neuronal activities (Fig. 2e). Here, we used electrical whisker stimulation, which elicits stronger fMRI signals relative to those induced by electric foot shocks. We performed unilateral stimulation and used the contralateral side as control. Electrical whisker stimulation induced stronger increases in fMRI signals in multiple brain regions of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 2f). Such brain regions included the ACC, M1, and PAG (Fig. 2g, h; Supplementary Fig. 4). Notably, a significant increase was observed in the ipsilateral but not contralateral primary sensory cortex, suggestive of the possibility of abnormal ipsilateral hypersensitivity. Among the four brain regions with altered signals, the ACC displayed the most significant difference between mutant and WT mice (ACC, p = 0.00149; PAG, p = 0.00665; iS1BF, p = 0.00847; M1, p = 0.01554) and had the highest importance score (see Methods for details) (Fig. 2i). These results collectively suggest that Grin2b haploinsufficiency in mice leads to neuronal hyperactivity especially in the ACC.
Increased excitatory synaptic transmission in Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC pyramidal neurons
To determine the synaptic basis for the increased neuronal activity in Grin2bC456Y/+ neurons, we determined spontaneous and evoked synaptic transmissions in ACC neurons, which are known to display strong sensory stimulus-dependent neuronal and synaptic changes [57–59].
Spontaneous excitatory synaptic transmission was increased in Grin2bC456Y/+ layer 2/3 ACC pyramidal neurons, compared with WT neurons, as shown by the frequency and amplitude of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) (Fig. 3a–c). In contrast, miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were unchanged in Grin2bC456Y/+ neurons (Fig. 3d–f).
Spontaneous excitatory synaptic transmission in the presence of network activity (spontaneous EPSCs or sEPSCs), which is monitored by omitting action potential (AP)-blocking tetrodotoxin, was similarly increased in Grin2bC456Y/+ neurons (Fig. 3g–i), suggesting that network activity does not affect mEPSCs. In contrast, spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were increased in Grin2bC456Y/+ neurons (Fig. 3j–l), suggesting that network activity increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in the mutant brain.
Importantly, the ratio of evoked excitatory to inhibitory synaptic transmissions (eEPSCs/eIPSCs) was increased in Grin2bC456Y/+ layer 2/3 ACC pyramidal neurons (Fig. 3m, n). Parameters of intrinsic excitability showed mixed changes in Grin2bC456Y/+ neurons, as supported by opposing changes of related parameters (decreased current-firing curve and input resistance vs. decreased post-burst afterhyperpolarization) and unaltered action potential (AP)-related parameters (threshold, amplitude, half-width) and afterhyperpolarization after 1st AP (Fig. 3o–v).
These results suggest that Grin2b haploinsufficiency increases excitatory synaptic transmission and induces mixed changes in neuronal excitability in Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons.
Chemogenetic ACC inhibition normalizes sensory hypersensitivity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice
To determine if the neuronal hyperactivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC leads to sensory hypersensitivity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, we set out to suppress ACC neuronal activity by a chemogenetic approach using DREADD. Grin2bC456Y/+ and control (WT) mice were infected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4Di-mCherry in the ACC at postnatal week 5, and sensory tests were conducted at postnatal week 8 in the presence of CNO or DMSO (control) (Fig. 4a).
ACC inhibition normalized the somatosensory hypersensitivity of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice in the electronic von Frey test, without affecting open-field locomotion or anxiety-like behavior (Fig. 4b–f). It also suppressed the thermal hypersensitivity of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice in the thermal place-preference test, although the hot-plate phenotype was not rescued (Fig. 4g, h). Moreover, ACC inhibition rescued the electric foot-shock phenotype in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice (Fig. 4i).
In control experiments, CNO or DMSO treatment of Grin2bC456Y/+ and WT mice injected with control virus (AAV-CaMKIIα-mCherry without hM4Di) had no effect on open-field activity or sensory hypersensitivity (Supplementary Fig. 5a-i). In addition, the concentrations of clozapine, which is a reverse-metabolite of CNO (clozapine-N-oxide) known to actually act on DREADD receptors in the brain [60], were comparable in WT and Grin2bC456Y/+ brains, as determined by mass spectrometry (Supplementary Fig. 5j). Moreover, inhibition of a non-ACC brain region (S1, somatosensory cortex) did not rescue the sensory hypersensitivity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 6). Lastly, early postnatal chronic treatment of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice with D-cycloserine, which could rescue anxiolytic-like behavior in these mice [48], had no effect on sensory hypersensitivity (Supplementary Fig. 7). These results collectively suggest that chemogenetic inhibition of ACC pyramidal neurons normalizes the sensory hypersensitivity of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice in the von Frey, thermal place-preference, and electric foot-shock tests.
Chemogenetic ACC inhibition normalizes whisker stimulation-related hyperactivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ brain
As chemogenetic inhibition of the Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC normalized the behavioral sensory hypersensitivity seen in these mice, we next tested if it could also normalize their neuronal hyperactivity. Grin2bC456Y/+ and WT mice were infected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4Di-mCherry in the ACC followed by fMRI responding to whisker stimulation in the presence of CNO or DMSO (control) (Fig. 5a).
Chemogenetic ACC inhibition normalized the whisker stimulation-induced hyperactivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC (Fig. 5b–d). In addition, a decrease was observed in the PAG. Two control experiments were performed. In Grin2bC456Y/+ and WT mice infected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4Di-mCherry in the ACC, DMSO treatment had no effect on the genotype difference in ACC and PAG neurons (Fig. 5e). Additionally, in WT and Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, whisker stimulation-induced fMRI signals were not affected by CNO treatment (Supplementary Fig. 8), suggesting CNO itself minimally affects whisker stimulation.
These results collectively suggest that chemogenetic inhibition of ACC normalizes the whisker stimulation-induced hyperactivity of ACC and PAG neurons in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice.
Chemogenetic ACC inhibition normalizes hyperconnectivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ brain
The results described thus far suggest that the hyperactivity of Grin2bC456Y/+ ACC neurons promotes the sensory hypersensitivity of the mutant mice. Next, we asked: How might the network connectivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ brain play a role in the behavioral sensory hypersensitivity of these mice? To this end, we analyzed network connectivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ brain under baseline and sensory stimulation conditions based on the correlated activities of different brain regions in the fMRI data.
Grin2bC456Y/+ mice displayed increases in baseline connectivity between the ACC and S1BF as well as within the regions of the default mode network (between the ACC and AUD+TEa and between the ACC and RSC) (Fig. 6a–c), known to be associated with ASD [61–64]. Under whisker stimulation conditions, increased network activity was observed in additional connections, including ACC-cortical connections (ACC-S1FL + S2 and ACC-RSC) and ACC-subcortical connections (ACC-SCs/m) (Fig. 6d–f). In addition, increased connectivity was observed in multiple non-ACC connections, including cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical connections.
The functional network of Grin2bC456Y/+ mice injected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4Di-mCherry in the ACC was assessed prior to CNO injection, revealing heightened network activity involving the ACC compared with WT mice (Fig. 6g–i). This was similar, although not identical, to the network hyperactivity observed in naïve Grin2bC456Y/+ mice (Fig. 6d–f). Importantly, CNO treatment eliminated the heightened network activity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice (Fig. 6j–l). In control experiments using WT and Grin2bC456Y/+ mice, connectivity patterns were not affected only by CNO treatment in in either WT or Grin2bC456Y/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 9), suggesting CNO itself minimally affects brain connectivity.
These results suggest that Grin2b haploinsufficiency leads to baseline hyperconnectivity between the ACC and somatosensory cortex as well as whisker stimulation-induced hyperconnectivity involving ACC/non-ACC and cortical/subcortical regions. In addition, these heightened network activities (baseline and sensory-evoked) are normalized by chemogenetic inhibition of ACC pyramidal neurons, in line with the reported hyperconnectivity of the default mode network in ASD [61–64].
Discussion
Our study reveals sensory supraspinal mechanism-related hypersensitivity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice and hyperactivity in certain brain regions, including ACC. The neuronal hyperactivity of the ACC involves increased excitatory synaptic transmission, and chemogenetic inhibition of ACC neurons reverses the sensory hypersensitivity. Connectivity analyses indicate that there is baseline and evoked hyperconnectivity between ACC and other cortical/subcortical regions, and that this is normalized by chemogenetic ACC inhibition.
Grin2bC456Y/+ mice show sensory hypersensitivity to mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimuli. These changes involve supra-spinal mechanisms, as supported by the normal sensory functions observed in Cdx2-Cre;Grin2bfl/+ mice. These results differ from the previous results obtained using mouse models of ASD, highlighting the peripheral roles of Mecp2 and Gabarb3, expressed in peripheral somatosensory neurons, and Shank3, expressed in peripheral dorsal root ganglia neurons, in the regulation of sensory functions [12, 14, 16, 21]. Therefore, our results constitute a case where supraspinal but not subspinal mechanisms underlie ASD-related sensory hypersensitivity.
The present c-fos and fMRI results reveal, in an unbiased manner, the brain regions that respond more strongly to sensory stimuli, including the ACC. The ACC is involved in pain processing and perception [57–59], and our study links it with sensory hypersensitivity in a mouse model of ASD, extending the previous studies highlighting the role of the primary somatosensory cortex in sensory hyper/hyposensitivity in mouse models of ASD (Shank3- and Syngap1-mutant mice) [11, 13].
Our electrophysiology results suggest that increased excitatory synaptic transmission may contribute to the hyperactivity of mutant ACC neurons. How might Grin2b deletion promote excitatory synaptic function? GluN2B-containing NMDARs critically regulate long-term depression (LTD) at developing excitatory synapses [39]. Accordingly, Grin2bC456Y/+ synapses display decreased NMDAR currents and impaired LTD at hippocampal excitatory synapses [48]. Given that LTD in developing brains is known to refine neural circuits by redistributing synaptic proteins to more active synapses [40, 41], impaired LTD in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice [48] may lead to insufficient circuit refinement and neuronal hyperconnectivity, as supported by the enhanced excitatory synaptic transmission and fMRI hyperconnectivity seen in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice. Our results, which are in line with the ASD-related hypothesis of excitation-inhibition imbalance [65–68], extend the recent study on Tsc2-mutant mice where excessive mTOR signaling causes increased excitatory synaptic density and fMRI-supported brain hyperconnectivity [69]. In addition, our results mainly involving changes in pyramidal neurons are distinct from the previous result that impaired GABA neurons abnormally activate target pyramidal neurons in Shank3-mutant mice [11]. Our results also differ from the decreased (not increased) excitatory synaptic transmission found in somatosensory cortical neurons of Syngap1-mutant mice [13].
Our connectivity analyses indicate that there is baseline hyperconnectivity between the ACC and S1BF/AUD+TEa and sensory stimulation-induced hyperconnectivity between the ACC and other cortical and subcortical regions in the mutant mice. In addition, chemogenetic inhibition of ACC neurons, which normalizes sensory hypersensitivity, also normalizes these network hyperconnectivities, causally linking the brain hyperconnectivity with sensory hypersensitivity in Grin2bC456Y/+ mice. The hyperconnectivity in the Grin2bC456Y/+ brain may involve a hyperconnection between the ACC and S1, which are known to regulate affective and sensory aspects of pain, respectively [70–74]. In line with this hypothesis, S1 input to the ACC promotes nociceptive responses, and chronic pain enhances ACC-S1 connectivity [75]. In addition, ACC-S1 hyperconnectivity involving excitatory synapses promotes both sensory and affective pain responses [76, 77]. Although further details remain to be determined, our study constitutes a platform where ASD-related excessive pain perception and responses [7–10] could be further explored.
In summary, our study shows that Grin2b haploinsufficiency in mice leads to behavioral sensory hypersensitivities that are causally associated with hyperactive ACC neurons with increased excitatory synaptic transmission and ACC-related brain regional hyperconnectivity under baseline and evoked states.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Medical Scientist Training Program under N11220108 (Project Number) from the Ministry of Science & ICT of Korea (to SL), the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (No. 2022R1C1C1007095 to SJH), the Korea Brain Research Institute basic research program (24-BR-02-02 to WBJ), and the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) (IBS-R015-D1 to SGK and IBS-R002-D1 to EK).
Author contributions
SL, WBJ, SGK, and EK designed experiments; SL performed behavioral experiments, immunofluorescence imaging and analysis, electrophysiological experiments, and chemogenetic rescue experiments; WBJ and GHI performed fMRI experiments and analyses; YWN performed behavioral and electrophysiologic experiments; H.M. performed chemogenetic experiments; W.S. performed behavioral experiments; YGK performed electrophysiologic experiments; YJ performed mass spectrometry; SL, JHY, SJH, SA, SGK, and EK wrote the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by KAIST.
Data availability
The source data underlying all figures and Supplementary figures are provided as Source Data files. All data reported in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided in this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Soowon Lee, Won Beom Jung, Heera Moon.
Contributor Information
Seong-Gi Kim, Email: seonggikim@skku.edu.
Eunjoon Kim, Email: kime@kaist.ac.kr.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41380-024-02572-y.
References
- 1.Balasco L, Provenzano G, Bozzi Y. Sensory abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: a focus on the tactile domain, from genetic mouse models to the clinic. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baranek GT, David FJ, Poe MD, Stone WL, Watson LR. Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tomchek SD, Dunn W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:190–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hazen EP, Stornelli JL, O’Rourke JA, Koesterer K, McDougle CJ. Sensory symptoms in autism spectrum disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22:112–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, Cermak SA, Engel-Yeger B, Gal E. A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wiggins LD, Robins DL, Bakeman R, Adamson LB. Brief report: sensory abnormalities as distinguishing symptoms of autism spectrum disorders in young children. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:1087–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nader R, Oberlander TF, Chambers CT, Craig KD. Expression of pain in children with autism. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:88–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rattaz C, Dubois A, Michelon C, Viellard M, Poinso F, Baghdadli A. How do children with autism spectrum disorders express pain? A comparison with developmentally delayed and typically developing children. Pain. 2013;154:2007–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moore DJ. Acute pain experience in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a review. Autism. 2015;19:387–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Allely CS. Pain sensitivity and observer perception of pain in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:916178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen Q, Deister CA, Gao X, Guo B, Lynn-Jones T, Chen N, et al. Dysfunction of cortical GABAergic neurons leads to sensory hyper-reactivity in a Shank3 mouse model of ASD. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:520–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Orefice LL, Mosko JR, Morency DT, Wells MF, Tasnim A, Mozeika SM, et al. Targeting peripheral somatosensory neurons to improve tactile-related phenotypes in ASD models. Cell. 2019;178:867–86. e824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Michaelson SD, Ozkan ED, Aceti M, Maity S, Llamosas N, Weldon M, et al. SYNGAP1 heterozygosity disrupts sensory processing by reducing touch-related activity within somatosensory cortex circuits. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han Q, Kim YH, Wang X, Liu D, Zhang ZJ, Bey AL, et al. SHANK3 deficiency impairs heat hyperalgesia and TRPV1 signaling in primary sensory neurons. Neuron. 2016;92:1279–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.He CX, Cantu DA, Mantri SS, Zeiger WA, Goel A, Portera-Cailliau C. Tactile defensiveness and impaired adaptation of neuronal activity in the Fmr1 knock-out mouse model of autism. J Neurosci. 2017;37:6475–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Orefice LL. Outside-in: rethinking the etiology of autism spectrum disorders. Science. 2019;366:45–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dawes JM, Weir GA, Middleton SJ, Patel R, Chisholm KI, Pettingill P, et al. Immune or genetic-mediated disruption of CASPR2 causes pain hypersensitivity due to enhanced primary afferent excitability. Neuron. 2018;97:806–22. e810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Balasco L, Pagani M, Pangrazzi L, Chelini G, Ciancone Chama AG, Shlosman E, et al. Abnormal whisker-dependent behaviors and altered cortico-hippocampal connectivity in Shank3b-/- mice. Cereb Cortex. 2022;32:3042–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang Y, Bonnan A, Bony G, Ferezou I, Pietropaolo S, Ginger M, et al. Dendritic channelopathies contribute to neocortical and sensory hyperexcitability in Fmr1(-/y) mice. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1701–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chelini G, Zerbi V, Cimino L, Grigoli A, Markicevic M, Libera F, et al. Aberrant somatosensory processing and connectivity in mice lacking engrailed-2. J Neurosci. 2019;39:1525–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Orefice LL, Zimmerman AL, Chirila AM, Sleboda SJ, Head JP, Ginty DD. Peripheral mechanosensory neuron dysfunction underlies tactile and behavioral deficits in mouse models of ASDs. Cell. 2016;166:299–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abrahams BS, Arking DE, Campbell DB, Mefford HC, Morrow EM, Weiss LA, et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol Autism. 2013;4:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Myers RA, Casals F, Gauthier J, Hamdan FF, Keebler J, Boyko AR, et al. A population genetic approach to mapping neurological disorder genes using deep resequencing. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.O’Roak BJ, Vives L, Fu W, Egertson JD, Stanaway IB, Phelps IG, et al. Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders. Science. 2012;338:1619–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Rubeis S, He X, Goldberg AP, Poultney CS, Samocha K, Cicek AE, et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature. 2014;515:209–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Platzer K, Yuan H, Schutz H, Winschel A, Chen W, Hu C, et al. GRIN2B encephalopathy: novel findings on phenotype, variant clustering, functional consequences and treatment aspects. J Med Genet. 2017;54:460–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hu C, Chen W, Myers SJ, Yuan H, Traynelis SF. Human GRIN2B variants in neurodevelopmental disorders. J Pharmacol Sci. 2016;132:115–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Burnashev N, Szepetowski P. NMDA receptor subunit mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;20C:73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabo SL, Lahr JM, Offer M, Weekes A, Sceniak MP. GRIN2B-related neurodevelopmental disorder: current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2022;14:1090865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hansen KB, Wollmuth LP, Bowie D, Furukawa H, Menniti FS, Sobolevsky AI, et al. Structure, function, and pharmacology of glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73:298–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ohtsuki T, Sakurai K, Dou H, Toru M, Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Arinami T. Mutation analysis of the NMDAR2B (GRIN2B) gene in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2001;6:211–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lemke JR, Hendrickx R, Geider K, Laube B, Schwake M, Harvey RJ, et al. GRIN2B mutations in West syndrome and intellectual disability with focal epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:147–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Endele S, Rosenberger G, Geider K, Popp B, Tamer C, Stefanova I, et al. Mutations in GRIN2A and GRIN2B encoding regulatory subunits of NMDA receptors cause variable neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1021–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dorval KM, Wigg KG, Crosbie J, Tannock R, Kennedy JL, Ickowicz A, et al. Association of the glutamate receptor subunit gene GRIN2B with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Genes Brain Behav. 2007;6:444–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arnold PD, Rosenberg DR, Mundo E, Tharmalingam S, Kennedy JL, Richter MA. Association of a glutamate (NMDA) subunit receptor gene (GRIN2B) with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a preliminary study. Psychopharmacology. 2004;174:530–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Myers SJ, Yuan H, Kang JQ, Tan FCK, Traynelis SF, Low CM. Distinct roles of GRIN2A and GRIN2B variants in neurological conditions. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Collingridge GL, Monaghan DT. The continually evolving role of NMDA receptors in neurobiology and disease. Neuropharmacology. 2022;210:109042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paoletti P, Bellone C, Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:383–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu L, Wong TP, Pozza MF, Lingenhoehl K, Wang Y, Sheng M, et al. Role of NMDA receptor subtypes in governing the direction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Science. 2004;304:1021–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Malenka RC, Bear MF. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 2004;44:5–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Collingridge GL, Peineau S, Howland JG, Wang YT. Long-term depression in the CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:459–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kutsuwada T, Sakimura K, Manabe T, Takayama C, Katakura N, Kushiya E, et al. Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDA receptor epsilon 2 subunit mutant mice. Neuron. 1996;16:333–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sprengel R, Suchanek B, Amico C, Brusa R, Burnashev N, Rozov A, et al. Importance of the intracellular domain of NR2 subunits for NMDA receptor function in vivo. Cell. 1998;92:279–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brigman JL, Wright T, Talani G, Prasad-Mulcare S, Jinde S, Seabold GK, et al. Loss of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in CA1 hippocampus and cortex impairs long-term depression, reduces dendritic spine density, and disrupts learning. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4590–4600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.von Engelhardt J, Doganci B, Jensen V, Hvalby O, Gongrich C, Taylor A, et al. Contribution of hippocampal and extra-hippocampal NR2B-containing NMDA receptors to performance on spatial learning tasks. Neuron. 2008;60:846–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tang YP, Shimizu E, Dube GR, Rampon C, Kerchner GA, Zhuo M, et al. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature. 1999;401:63–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Akashi K, Kakizaki T, Kamiya H, Fukaya M, Yamasaki M, Abe M, et al. NMDA receptor GluN2B (GluR epsilon 2/NR2B) subunit is crucial for channel function, postsynaptic macromolecular organization, and actin cytoskeleton at hippocampal CA3 synapses. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10869–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shin W, Kim K, Serraz B, Cho YS, Kim D, Kang M, et al. Early correction of synaptic long-term depression improves abnormal anxiety-like behavior in adult GluN2B-C456Y-mutant mice. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Akyol A, Hinoi T, Feng Y, Bommer GT, Glaser TM, Fearon ER. Generating somatic mosaicism with a Cre recombinase–microsatellite sequence transgene. Nat Methods. 2008;5:231–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Song JH, Choi W, Song YH, Kim JH, Jeong D, Lee SH, et al. Precise mapping of single neurons by calibrated 3D reconstruction of brain slices reveals topographic projection in mouse visual cortex. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.You T, Im GH, Kim SG. Characterization of brain-wide somatosensory BOLD fMRI in mice under dexmedetomidine/isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jung WB, Im GH, Jiang H, Kim SG. Early fMRI responses to somatosensory and optogenetic stimulation reflect neural information flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2023265118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jung WB, Jiang H, Lee S, Kim SG. Dissection of brain-wide resting-state and functional somatosensory circuits by fMRI with optogenetic silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2113313119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ding C, Peng H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005;3:185–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bouvier G, Bidoret C, Casado M, Paoletti P. Presynaptic NMDA receptors: Roles and rules. Neuroscience. 2015;311:322–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:405–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bliss TV, Collingridge GL, Kaang BK, Zhuo M. Synaptic plasticity in the anterior cingulate cortex in acute and chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:485–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fuchs PN, Peng YB, Boyette-Davis JA, Uhelski ML. The anterior cingulate cortex and pain processing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA, Fox AS, Winter JJ, Davidson RJ. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:154–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gomez JL, Bonaventura J, Lesniak W, Mathews WB, Sysa-Shah P, Rodriguez LA, et al. Chemogenetics revealed: DREADD occupancy and activation via converted clozapine. Science. 2017;357:503–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lynch CJ, Uddin LQ, Supekar K, Khouzam A, Phillips J, Menon V. Default mode network in childhood autism: posteromedial cortex heterogeneity and relationship with social deficits. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:212–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Padmanabhan A, Lynch CJ, Schaer M, Menon V. The default mode network in autism. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017;2:476–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Assaf M, Jagannathan K, Calhoun VD, Miller L, Stevens MC, Sahl R, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity of default mode sub-networks in autism spectrum disorder patients. Neuroimage. 2010;53:247–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Harikumar A, Evans DW, Dougherty CC, Carpenter KLH, Michael AM. A review of the default mode network in autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Connect. 2021;11:253–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lee E, Lee J, Kim E. Excitation/Inhibition imbalance in animal models of autism spectrum disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81:838–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sohal VS, Rubenstein JLR. Excitation-inhibition balance as a framework for investigating mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:1248–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Prigge M, Schneider F, Davidson TJ, O’Shea DJ, et al. Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction. Nature. 2011;477:171–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nelson SB, Valakh V. Excitatory/Inhibitory balance and circuit homeostasis in autism spectrum disorders. Neuron. 2015;87:684–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pagani M, Barsotti N, Bertero A, Trakoshis S, Ulysse L, Locarno A, et al. mTOR-related synaptic pathology causes autism spectrum disorder-associated functional hyperconnectivity. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Craig AD, Reiman EM, Evans A, Bushnell MC. Functional imaging of an illusion of pain. Nature. 1996;384:258–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science. 1997;277:968–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Johansen JP, Fields HL, Manning BH. The affective component of pain in rodents: direct evidence for a contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8077–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Price DD. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science. 2000;288:1769–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hofbauer RK, Rainville P, Duncan GH, Bushnell MC. Cortical representation of the sensory dimension of pain. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:402–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Singh A, Patel D, Li A, Hu L, Zhang Q, Liu Y, et al. Mapping cortical integration of sensory and affective pain pathways. Curr Biol. 2020;30:1703–15. e1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Johansen JP, Fields HL. Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex produces an aversive teaching signal. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:398–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhou H, Zhang Q, Martinez E, Dale J, Hu S, Zhang E, et al. Ketamine reduces aversion in rodent pain models by suppressing hyperactivity of the anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The source data underlying all figures and Supplementary figures are provided as Source Data files. All data reported in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided in this paper.