Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Sep 19;72(39):21301–21317. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c02920

Antioxidative, Glucose Management, and Muscle Protein Synthesis Properties of Fish Protein Hydrolysates and Peptides

Niloofar Shekoohi , Brian P Carson ‡,§, Richard J Fitzgerald †,§,*
PMCID: PMC11450812  PMID: 39297866

Abstract

graphic file with name jf4c02920_0001.jpg

The marine environment is an excellent source for many physiologically active compounds due to its extensive biodiversity. Among these, fish proteins stand out for their unique qualities, making them valuable in a variety of applications due to their diverse compositional and functional properties. Utilizing fish and fish coproducts for the production of protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides not only enhances their economic value but also reduces their potential environmental harm, if left unutilized. Fish protein hydrolysates (FPHs), known for their excellent nutritional value, favorable amino acid profiles, and beneficial biological activities, have generated significant interest for their potential health benefits. These hydrolysates contain bioactive peptides which are peptide sequences known for their beneficial physiological effects. These biologically active peptides play a role in metabolic regulation/modulation and are increasingly seen as promising ingredients in functional foods, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals, with potential to improve human health and prevent disease. This review aims to summarize the current in vitro, cell model (in situ) and in vivo research on the antioxidant, glycaemic management and muscle health enhancement properties of FPHs and their peptides.

Keywords: fish protein hydrolysates, bioactive peptides, antioxidant, glycaemic management, muscle health

1. Introduction

The marine environment represents one of the most valuable natural resources on planet earth as it provides food largely in the form of fish and shellfish. It is also an excellent natural resource for many physiologically active compounds due to its extensive biodiversity. This large diversity and the dynamics of the marine ecosystem makes it an ideal reservoir for the identification of new molecules and for the development of marine-derived health enhancing components/ingredients. More than 20,000 marine bioactive compounds have been isolated, however, only a small proportion of these have been thoroughly studied and exploited.1 In 2018, the global market for marine-derived compounds was over $10 billion US, which is expected to increase to $22 billion by 2025 at a compound annual growth rate of 11.3% from 2019 to 2025.2

Among marine resources, fish proteins possess unique characteristics that make them valuable ingredients in various applications. These proteins can be derived from different fish species, including marine and freshwater, and they exhibit a wide range of compositional and functional properties.3 The protein content in raw fish flesh and shellfish varies, typically ranging from 17 to 22% (w/w) and from 7 to 23% (w/w), respectively.4 The aquaculture of fish is increasing globally with more than 196 million tons expected to be grown in 2025.5 The fish processing industry generates large amounts of coproducts such as heads, skin, trimmings, fins, viscera, frames and sometimes muscle, which are currently either wasted, underutilized, or used to produce low value products such as fishmeal and fish silage. These coproducts may amount to 50% of the whole fish but this can range from 10% to 90%, depending on the fish species and the intended use.6,7 There are large volumes of discards on board fishing vessels, which account for 9–15% of global catch, leading to significant levels of underutilized fish resources.8 There is an increased focus on these underutilized protein sources due to the worldwide demand for high quality, sustainable protein to support the growing population. Alongside advancements in capturing and processing techniques, the extraction and purification of bioactive compounds such as peptides and amino acids (AAs) from underutilized mesopelagic fish species could offer an economically and nutritionally sustainable strategy for greater utilization of this resource. Fish processing proteinaceous coproducts have, e.g., the potential to be used as sources of essential amino acids (EAAs), collagen/gelatin and enzymes.9 The crude protein content of fish processing coproducts ranges between 8 and 35%.10 Fish protein coproducts can be used to generate protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides, increasing their economic value while decreasing their potentially negative environmental impact.11 Because fish protein hydrolysates (FPHs) can have an excellent nutritional composition, favorable AA profiles and beneficial biological activities, there has been significant interest in examining their potential industrial applications as functional food ingredients.12

Protein hydrolysates are complex mixtures of oligopeptides and free AAs formed by partial or extensive hydrolysis which are generally produced during enzymatic hydrolysis of intact proteins with proteolytic and peptideolytic enzyme activities.13 The bioactivity of peptides is related to their AA composition and sequence.14 Biologically active peptides may play a crucial role in metabolic regulation and modulation.15 They therefore hold potential as functional food ingredients, nutraceuticals and pharmaceutical agents, offering opportunities to enhance human health and prevent diseases. The reported activities of these biopeptides include antihypertensive, opioid agonist or antagonist, immunomodulatory, antithrombotic, antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial activities.15 Moreover, several peptides have been reported to exhibit multifunctional bioactivities.16 FPHs and associated peptides may provide health benefits, consequently, FPHs and their peptides are being promoted as functional food ingredients. This review focuses on the in vitro, cell (in situ) and in vivo evidence concerning the antioxidant, glycaemic management and muscle health enhancement effects of FPHs and their associated peptides.

2. Proximate Composition of FPH

The process of producing FPH is crucial for their chemical composition and nutritional value. According to the literature, the in vitro hydrolysis of protein substrates using appropriate exogenous proteolytic enzymes is the most widely used process for the production of protein hydrolysates and peptides with desirable biological properties.17 Most food proteins contain bioactive peptides that are inactive within the sequence of their parent proteins and can be released by enzymatic hydrolysis, either in the body during gastrointestinal digestion by endogenous proteases or during food processing (e.g., during fermentation) or by proteolytic processes using appropriate exogenous proteases.13 The chemical composition of food materials has a significant impact on human health in terms of their ability to supply essential nutrients. Many reports indicate the protein equivalent content of FPHs to range between 60 and 90% (w/w) on a dry weight (dw) basis.1825 The high protein equivalent content reported for FPHs is due to solubilization of proteins during hydrolysis and removal of insoluble solid matter by, e.g., centrifugation.26,27 The high protein equivalent content in FPHs demonstrates their potential use as protein supplements for human nutrition. Several studies report the lipid content for various FPHs to be below 5% (w/w dw).19,2123,2830 A limited number of reports describe lipid contents above 5% (w/w) for FPHs.2426 The low lipid content of FPHs may be due to the removal of lipid with the insoluble protein fraction during centrifugation. Most studies report that hydrolysates from various fish proteins contain moisture levels below 10% (w/w) dw.19,2123,26,28,30,31 The relatively low moisture contents of protein hydrolysates may be related to the type of sample and to the high temperatures employed during the evaporation and spray drying processes employed to stabilize these hydrolysates.32 The ash content of FPHs was reported to range between 0.45 and 27% (w/w) dw.18,2123,26,30,33,34 This relatively high ash content of FPHs may, in part, be related to addition of acid or base during the enzymatic hydrolysis process as a means of controlling the pH.

Protein hydrolysates are made up of free AAs and short chain peptides. Table 1 shows the AA composition of some protein hydrolysates prepared from various fish processing protein-rich coproducts. Aspartic acid and glutamic acid were found to be highly abundant in the majority of the reported FPHs. All EAAs and nonessential amino acids (NEAAs) were found in FPHs, although the aromatic amino acids were not found or found at low levels in Alaska pollock frame (APF, derived from frozen backbones) protein hydrolysates.35Table 1 also illustrates the high content of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) in FPHs which may make FPHs a good source for enhancement of muscle health via stimulation of protein synthesis.

Table 1. Amino Acid Composition of Fish Protein Hydrolysates (mg/g Protein/Powder) Generated from Different Fish Species Following Hydrolysis Using Alcalase (A) and Flavourzyme 500L (F)a.

    red salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) hydrolysates (mg/g protein)167
herring (Clupea harengus) byproduct hydrolysates (mg/g protein)24
  yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) protein hydrolysates (mg/g powder)168
brown stripe red snapper (Lutjanus vitta) muscle protein hydrolysates (mg/g powder)20
amino acid blue whiting protein hydrolysates (mg/g powder)163 A F HBH HHH blue whiting protein hydrolysates (mg amino acid/g powder)86 A F A F
aspartic acid 85.6 88.3 87.7 93.8 89.2 64.2 95.5 94.0 106.5 107.3
threonine 37 41.9 42.1 39.3 40.4 25.9     51.0 49.1
serine 41.0 46.1 46.2 41.1 45.3 25.5 53.5 54.0 51.5 50.2
glutamic acid 125.0 135.1 134.9 163.4 145.1 94.1 137.7 138.9 162.3 169.2
proline 34.1 65.0 66.8 41.0 58.9 20.2 38.1 38.4 36.6 34.6
glycine 55.2 97.6 102.9 69.8 95.0 27.8 88.7 86.5 74.8 72.1
alanine 54.1 68.4 68.8 70.1 69.4 38.4 94.9 94.6 93.8 95.6
valine 38.9 50.1 45.2 44.7 45.7 27.8 36.1 33.8 51.5 51.5
methionine 19.4 28.8 29.4 33.3 33.1 18.2 25.8 18.7 29.3 29.2
isoleucine 33.5 37.1 36.6 33.2 32.6 27.4 41.4 44.9 41.4 40.7
leucine 57.8 66.9 66.5 78.8 71.2 48.0 83.8 85.8 85.4 86.2
tyrosine 32.3 32.5 30.9 26.3 27.4 18.7 57.0 61.1 23.3 21.4
phenylalanine 28.7 40.7 39.7 34.9 37.2 23.1 26.1 26.6 26.5 24.5
histidine 15.3 23.8 23.0 26.0 18.9 8.6 36.2 29.8 17.1 16.0
hydroxyproline   23.5 25.6     0.0        
lysine 74.4 73.9 72.5 106.6 80.4 53.9 83.5 87.2 95.1 97.6
arginine 59.4 67.7 69.2 70.5 73.0 40.7 35.0 38.8 50.0 50.6
tryptophan 6.5         0.0     2.8 2.9
cysteine 6.1     11.2 11.1 6.5 14.7 15.3 1.2 1.4
a

HBH = herring body (only head and gonads were removed) hydrolysates (generated with Alcalase); HHH = herring head hydrolysates (generated with Alcalase)

3. Biological Activities of FPH

Peptides obtained from the hydrolysis of food proteins have generated significant attention for their potential applications as nutritional and functional food ingredients. FPHs have been identified as favorable protein sources for human consumption due to their well-balanced AA composition and their beneficial impact on human nutrition.36 Recent studies demonstrate that FPHs may have a number of physiological effects beyond their primary role as sources of nitrogen and EAAs.37 A detailed search of various academic databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords such as “fish protein hydrolysates,” “antioxidant activity,” “fish byproducts” and “bioactive peptides” was performed herein. The search focused on studies to capture recent advancements in the field.

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

It is now widely acknowledged that consuming dietary antioxidants is an effective approach to enhance the body’s antioxidant capacity and to counteract the effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS).15 The mechanisms by which this occurs include ROS inactivation,38 scavenging of free radicals,39 chelation of pro-oxidative transition metals40 and in the reduction of hydroperoxides.41,42 Certain amino acids, such as His, Glu, Asp along with phosphorylated Ser and Thr possess the ability to chelate prooxidative transition metals.40 Peptides can possess potent antioxidants activity due to the enhanced stability of the stable molecular structure formed when antioxidants react with a free radical.15 The antioxidant potential of a protein or peptide relies on the accessibility of the amino acids therein to prooxidants. Various protein hydrolysates and peptides exhibit potent antioxidant activity.43 Many antioxidant hydrolysates and peptides reported in the literature are from fish sources. As an example, longtail cod, cod, and mackerel hydrolysates showed higher antioxidant activity than common antioxidants such as α-tocopherol and butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA).43 In another study, the antioxidant activities of protein hydrolysate powders generated from the soluble protein fraction in blue whiting soluble protein hydrolysate (BWSPH) using six commercial enzymes were tested.44 Significant variation in the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging capacity was observed across all BWSPHs. Distinct differences in scavenging capability emerged at concentrations of 3.0 mg/mL and higher. The Flavourzyme generated hydrolysate exhibited significantly higher scavenging potential compared to the BWSPHs generated with the other enzyme preparations. Regarding reducing power, the Protamex hydrolysate displayed significantly higher values compared to the other BWSPHs. Moreover, the ferrous chelating ability assay demonstrated a comparable concentration-dependent enhancement in antioxidant capacity for all the BWSPHs.44 The antioxidant properties of fish hydrolysates and peptides have primarily been evaluated using in vitro assays that measure the scavenging activity of free radicals and ROS. These assays include tests such as the DPPH radical scavenging activity assay, the 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assay, the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), the hydroxyl (OH) radical scavenging activity and the superoxide anion (O2) radical scavenging activity assays. Mammalian cells contain a range of enzyme activities that can effectively hinder or deter the formation of free radicals or reactive species. These include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px). SOD functions by dismutating superoxide radicals, while CAT and GSH-Px break down hydrogen peroxide and hydroperoxides into harmless molecules, namely water (H2O) and oxygen (O2).45 It was reported that a BWSPH exhibited pronounced antioxidant effects both pre- and postsimulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion (SGID) on murine RAW264.7 macrophages.46 This hydrolysate elevated endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH) levels in tert-butylhydroperoxide (tBOOH)-treated cells and attenuated ROS in H2O2-challenged RAW264.7 cells. Table 2 summarizes the sources, the peptide sequences and the in vitro/in situ antioxidant activities of fish protein derived antioxidative peptides. Results from in vitro studies showed that peptide composition appears to influence their antioxidative properties. For example, peptides rich in hydrophobic amino acids demonstrate potent antioxidant properties by interacting with lipid molecules and scavenging lipid-derived radicals. GSTVPERTHPACPDFN from Hoki frame (Johnius belengerii), having a molecular mass of 1801 Da, exhibited high efficacy in inhibiting lipid peroxidation and in in vitro scavenging various free radicals such as DPPH, hydroxyl, peroxyl and superoxide radicals.47 The antioxidant activity was attributed to its high content of hydrophobic amino acids such as Trp and Tyr, which have the ability to stabilize free radicals and interrupt the peroxidation process. Similarly, peptides derived from blue-spotted stingray (e.g., WAFAPA and MYPGLA)48 and hairtail (including QNDER, KS, KA, and AKG)49 also show significant in vitro antioxidant activities due to the presence of hydrophobic residues such as Leu, Ile, Ala, Val and Met. The presence of these hydrophobic residues enhances the peptides’ ability to interact with lipid molecules, facilitating the scavenging of lipid-derived radicals and inhibiting lipid peroxidation.5052

Table 2. Fish Protein Derived Peptide Sequences with in Vitro and in Situ Antioxidant Activitiesa.

fish source peptide sequence antioxidant activity ref
Hoki—frame (Johnius belengerii) GSTVPERTHPACPDFN DPPH (EC50: 41.37 μM), OH-radical scavenging activity (EC50: 17.77 μM) (47)
blue-spotted stingray muscle (Dasyatis kuhlii) WAFAPA, MYPGLA ABTS radical scavenging activity (EC50:12.6 and 19.8 μM) (48)
hairtail muscle (Trichiurus japonicas) KA, AKG, IYG DPPH (EC50: 0.626–0.902 mg/mL), ABTS (EC50: 0.586–1.652 mg/mL), OH- (EC50: 1.740–2.498 mg/mL), O2- radical scavenging activity (EC50: 1.355–2.538 mg/mL) (49)
Spanish mackerel skin (Scomberomorous niphonius) PFGPD, PYGAKG, YGPM DPPH (EC50: 0.72–3.02 mg/mL), ABTS (EC50: 0.82–1.07 mg/mL), OH- (EC50: 0.66–0.88 mg/mL), O2- radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.73–0.91 mg/mL) (169)
skipjack tuna bones (Katsuwonus pelamis) GADIVA, GAEGFIF DPPH (EC50: 0.52 and 0.30 mg/mL), ABTS (EC50: 0.44 and 0.21 mg/mL), OH- (EC50: 0.25 and 0.32 mg/mL), O2- radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.52 and 0.48 mg/mL) (61)
round scad muscle (Decapterus maruadsi) KGFR DPPH radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.13 mg/mL) (60)
black shark skin ATVY DPPH (62.25% inhibition), ABTS radical scavenging activity (81.05% inhibition) (53)
Atlantic sea cucumber TEFHLL myeloperoxidase inhibition (170)
sturgeon (Acipenser schrencki) skin GDRGESGPA DPPH radical scavenging activity (EC50, 1.93 mM) (56)
horse mackerel skin (Magalaspis cordyla) NHRYDR DPPH and •OH radical scavenging activity (171)
croaker skin (Otolithes ruber) GNRGFACRHA DPPH and •OH radical scavenging activity (171)
tuna dark muscle (Thunnus tonggol) LPTSEAAKY and PMDYMVT DPPH (79.6 and 85.2% inhibition) radical scavenging activity and ferric thiocyanate method (172)
cutlassfish muscle (Trichiurus lepturus) FSGE DPPH (EC50: 0.03 mg/mL), eroxyl radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.02 mg/mL) (173)
stone fish flesh (Actinopygalecanora) GVSGLHID DPPH (EC50: 4.14 mg/mL) and ABTS radical scavenging activity (EC50: 3.28 mg/mL) (174)
sea squirt (Halocynthiaroretzi) protein LEW, MTTL, YYPYQL DPPH (EC50:1.29–10 mM), ABTS, ORAC, Fe2 + chelating activity (9.20–12.5%) (54)
tuna roe ICRD, LCGEC DPPH radical scavenging activity HaCaT cells: SOD, Mn-SOD, Cu-SOD, GSH-Px, MDA (62)
tuna trimmings ACGSDGK, KFCSGHA myeloperoxidase inhibition, ORAC (0.82 and 0.96 μM trolox/mg peptide) (57)
squid head REGYFK DPPH and ABTS scavenging activity (175)
spotless smooth hound cartilage (Mustelus griseus) GAERP, GEREANVM, AEVG DPPH (EC50: 0.87–3.73 mg/mL), ABTS (EC50: 0.05–1.0 mg/mL), OH- (EC50: 0.06–0.34 mg/mL), O2- radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.09–0.33 mg/mL) HepG2 cells: lipid peroxidation inhibition (63)
redlip croaker—scales (Pseudosciaena polyactis) GPEGPMGLE, EGPFGPEG, GFIGPTE DPPH (EC50: 0.37–0.59 mg/mL), OH (EC50: 0.32–0.45 mg/mL), O2 radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.47- 0.74 mg/mL). HepG2 cells: ROS level, lipid peroxidation inhibition (64)
Hoki—skin (Johnius belengerii) HGPLGPL DPPH (EC50: 156.8 μM), O2 radical scavenging activity (EC50: 28.8 μM). Hep3B cells: SOD (92.8% increase), GPx (60.78% increase), CAT (35% increase) (65)
monkfish muscle (Lophius litulon) EDIVCW, MGPVW, YWDAY DPPH (EC50: 0.39–0.62 mg/mL), OH- (EC50:0.32–0.61 mg/mL), O2 radical scavenging activity (EC50: 0.48–0.94 mg/mL). HepG2 cells: ROS level, lipid peroxidation inhibition (66)
Pacific herring muscle (Clupea pallasii) LHDELT, KEEKFE DPPH (EC50: 5.14 and 4.37 mg/mL), OH radical scavenging activity (EC50: 4.57 and 3.78 mg/mL) (67)
    HepG2 cells: cellular antioxidant activity (EC50: 1.19 and 1.04 mg/mL)  
Pacific cod skin gelatin (Gadus macrocephalus) TCSP, TGGGNV RAW 264.7 cells: intracellular free radical scavenging activity (176)
a

DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MDA, ,malondialdehyde; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; O2, superoxide anion; OH, hydroxyl. One letter amino acid code used for peptide sequences.

Aromatic amino acids further contribute to antioxidant activity by stabilizing scavenged radicals. Peptides containing aromatic residues, such as Phe, Trp, and Tyr, exhibit enhanced in vitro radical scavenging capabilities.52 For instance, ATVY from black shark skin showed strong ABTS radical and DPPH radical scavenging ability due to its aromatic amino acid content.53 Similarly, sea squirt-derived peptides, including LEW, YYPYQL, and MTTL, displayed high antioxidant activities largely attributable to their aromatic residues.54 The presence of Trp, Tyr and Pro in these peptides plays a crucial role in their high antioxidant potential by donating protons to electron-deficient radicals.55 The aromatic amino acid residues in peptides from sturgeon skin collagen (e.g., GDRGESGPA)56 and tuna (including ACGSDGK and KFCSGHA)57 aid in stabilizing radicals and in enhancing their antioxidant properties. Moreover, the presence of Phe, an aromatic amino acid, in FSGE peptides from cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus) muscle may have contributed to the antioxidant activity.54

Polar amino acids are essential for hydroxyl radical scavenging and metal ion chelation.58,59 Peptides such as KGFR from round scad60 and GDRGESGPA from sturgeon skin collagen56 are notable for the presence of polar residues, including Lys and Arg, which contribute to their strong antioxidant and metal chelation activities. Similarly, polar AAs, including Lys, Glu, Asp and Gly, in peptides from hairtail,61 demonstrate the importance of polar residues in enhancing antioxidant efficacy.

Several in situ cell studies (Table 2) have demonstrated the ability of fish derived peptides to enhance endogenous antioxidant enzyme systems, to scavenge ROS and to protect cells from oxidative damage.6267 It is important to note that although in vitro assays provide a controlled experimental environment, cellular bioassays involve maintaining cells outside the living organism, necessitating careful interpretation of results due to the inherent complexity of organ systems in vivo.

The antioxidant activity of two peptides, ICRD and LCGEC, derived from tuna roe has been evaluated in HaCaT cells from human adult skin keratinocytes.62 Both ICRD and LCGEC improved antioxidant activity by increasing the level of SOD and GSH-Px, by decreasing the level of MDA and by regulated the Keap1/Nrf2-ARE pathway in the cells.62 The presence of Cys in the peptide sequence and the low molecular mass of peptides (<3 kDa) could also be related to their antioxidant activity.68

Peptides derived from a tryptic hydrolysate of hoki (Johnius belengerii) skin gelatin were examined in cultured human hepatoma cells (Hep3B).65 The antioxidative enzyme levels in cells were increased in the presence of this peptide and it was presumed to be the peptide mainly involved in maintaining the redox balance in the cell environment. The N-terminally located His residue of the peptide was expected to act as a strong proton donating residue in the sequence. Furthermore, this peptide is rich in Leu, Gly, and Pro and repeats in the sequence.65 Similarly, three peptides (GPEGPMGLE, EGPFGPEG, and GFIGPTE) from redlip croaker (Pseudosciaena polyactis) scales, including Gly and Pro in their sequences, showed significant protective effects in HepG2 cells from H2O2-induced oxidative damage. They were able to decrease the levels of ROS and MDA while increasing intracellular antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT and GSH-Px.64 Furthermore, peptides from Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) skin gelatin, TCSP and TGGGNV, exhibited potent in situ antioxidant activity. The presence of hydrophobic amino acids in these peptides (Gly and Pro) and Cys could be related to their antioxidant ability.67

The antioxidant activities of three peptides (EDIVCW, MGPVW, YWDAY) derived from a monkfish (Lophius litulon) muscle protein hydrolysate was assessed in H2O2-treated HepG2 cells.66 These three peptides were capable of concentration-dependently protecting HepG2 cells from oxidative damage induced by H2O2. The hydrophobic/aromatic AA residues in the sequences of EDIVCW, MEPVW, and YWDAW appeared to play a crucial role in their antioxidant activity. Moreover, three peptides (GAERP, GEREANVM, AEVG) isolated from spotless smooth hound (Mustelus griseus) cartilage enhanced the endogenous antioxidant defense systems in HepG2 cells, including the antioxidant enzyme defense and the GSH systems.63 The results suggested that the presence of acidic and basic AAs, and hydrophobic AAs such as Pro and Met contributed to their antioxidant activities.

Generally, the precise mechanism responsible for the antioxidant activity of bioactive peptides has not been fully elucidated. The AA residues associated with antioxidant activity can be categorized into three groups: hydrophobic, aromatic and charged AAs. Hydrophobic and aromatic AAs are believed to function as hydrogen donors, transferring electrons to scavenge free radicals. Basic and acidic AA residues with metal chelating properties can inhibit oxidation by scavenging ferrous ions and by disrupting the oxidation chain.69,70 Moreover, the specificity of the hydrolytic protease and the extent of protein hydrolysis, which directly impacts the molecular mass of the hydrolysate/peptide, the AA sequence, hydrophobicity and the charge of the resulting peptides also affects the overall antioxidant activity. Peptides with molecular masses ranging from 500 to 1500 Da have generally been associated with high levels of antioxidant activity.71,72

The antioxidant effects of bioactive peptides derived from fish sources have been investigated in some animal studies offering a direct approach for investigating the biological mechanisms underlying the antioxidant activity induced by bioactive peptides. The peptide KTFCGRH from croaker (Otolithes ruber)73 exhibited antioxidant properties in Wistar rat resulting in increased levels of CAT, SOD and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity.

Another peptide, WHKNCF RCAKCGKSL (WL15) from snakehead fish (Channa striatus, C. striatus), demonstrated strong free radical scavenging activity in DPPH, ABTS, superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide scavenging assays at 50 μM compared with the standard antioxidants Trolox and ascorbic acid. For the in vivo assessment, zebrafish embryos were treated with the WL15 peptide (50 μM) which attenuated the expression of activated caspase 3 expression, reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) level and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, specifically that of SOD and CAT. Furthermore, the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes such as GST, GPx and γ-glutamyl cysteine synthetase (GCS) was also found to be upregulated.70

Moreover, collagen oligopeptides purified from tilapia scales (1000 mg/kg BW) significantly increased SOD, CAT and GSH-Px activities along with reducing the MDA content compared to the negative control group in ethanol-induced gastroduodenal injury in Wistar rats after 30 days.74

Through these in vivo trials, it was observed that studies on bioactive peptides derived from FPHs can provide valuable insights into their potential as natural antioxidants through enhancing endogenous antioxidant defense by combating oxidative stress-related damage in living organisms. However, further investigation using in vivo studies, particularly involving human subjects, is warranted to confirm the antioxidant effects of FPHs. To the best of our knowledge, studies focusing on the antioxidant activity of FPH-derived peptides in humans are currently lacking. This gap highlights the need for such research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the potential antioxidant benefits of FPHs within the complex physiological processes occurring in vivo.

3.2. Glycaemic Management Effects

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which accounts for approximately 90% of all cases of diabetes, is currently one of the fastest growing health problems worldwide.75 Dietary protein, protein hydrolysates, peptides and AAs have been shown to improve glycaemic control, with their impact varying depending on the primary sequence of the peptides and AAs produced during digestion.7678 Their antidiabetic activity can be via regulating blood glucose by inhibiting enzymes such as α-amylase, α-glucosidase and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV), by promoting insulin signaling and via the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway.79 The AMPK signaling pathway plays a multifaceted role in diabetes. It promotes glucose control by enhancing glucose uptake and utilization, improves insulin sensitivity, and protects β cells from stress and cell death.80 These effects can occur in various tissues, including muscle, adipose tissue and liver, each playing a distinct role in glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. These effects collectively contribute to the management and prevention of diabetes, providing potential therapeutic targets for the management/treatment of this metabolic disorder.

FPHs have shown the ability to enhance glucose uptake in vivo thereby presenting their potential for the management of hyperglycaemia alongside conventional drug therapy.81 These hydrolysates may ameliorate glucose tolerance either by promoting glucose uptake through a mechanism distinct from insulin or by enhancing insulin responsiveness in target cells.81 Collagen, for example, is an abundant protein that can be extracted from common fish coproducts such as skin, scales and bones.82 Pro–Hyp–Gly is the most frequently occurring tripeptide (10.5%) in collagen.83 Collagen and its hydrolysates/peptides has found extensive application for diabetes management.84

Enhancements in glycaemic management parameters due to FPHs are reported to occur via hormonal mechanisms (including the stimulation of insulin secretion), via the inhibition of DPP-IV activity to extend the duration of the endogenous incretin hormone effects and via promotion of the release of incretin hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP).85 Harnedy et al.86 and Parthsarathy et al.87 reported that FPHs can induce an increase in insulin secretion in BRIN-BD11 cells. Furthermore, both studies observed a significant increase in plasma insulin level in healthy mice.86,87 A similar increase in plasma insulin in mice was also observed by Iba et al.88 The plasma levels of insulin and active GLP-1 were assessed 15 min following glucose administration to male C57BL/6J mice (8 weeks old). Notably, the preadministration of fish (Oreochromis sp.) collagen hydrolysates 45 min prior to a glucose challenge led to an enhancement in glucose-triggered insulin secretion.88 Various studies have investigated GLP-1 secretion, both in vitro and in vivo following treatment with FPHs and their associated peptides.8991 The chronic administration (30 days) of a tilapia skin gelatin hydrolysate resulted in a substantial increase in active plasma GLP-1 in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.91 The specific mechanism by which fish derived proteins and protein hydrolysates or peptides exert antidiabetic effects remains unclear. It remains to be investigated if the heightened level of hormone release induced by FPH arises from further peptide breakdown into free amino acids or if the peptides per se in the hydrolysates retain their bioactivity upon passage through the gastrointestinal tract.

While numerous investigations have explored the in vitro effectiveness of FPHs as inhibitors of DPP-IV,9297 there exists a limited number of in vivo studies dedicated to assessing plasma DPP-IV activity.98,99 Furthermore, while many studies have demonstrated a decrease in blood glucose levels, direct measurement of plasma DPP-IV activity has often not been carried out. Some of the observed effects might indeed be attributed to reduced DPP-IV activity, however, this potential mechanism does not appear to have been directly measured during in vivo FPH studies, warranting further investigation.

A promising body of research indicates the potential of FPHs to enhance glucose uptake and diminish lipid accumulation in vitro.86 Amplified glucose uptake holds significance in managing blood glucose levels in T2DM, given the heightened hepatic glucose production and subsequent elevated blood glucose, which can lead to glucotoxicity and eventual α-cell dysfunction.100 However, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms governing glucose uptake as mediated by FPHs remains limited. Key regulators of glycemic control, including insulin receptor (IR), insulin receptor substrate-1/2 (IRS-1/2), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) and protein kinase B (Akt) all contribute to increasing insulin sensitivity. However, no studies with FPHs appear to have been conducted thus far to investigate the upregulation of these pathways, nor have changes in insulin sensitivity been reported in any in vivo studies.

While a considerable amount of research has focused on the glycaemic management potential of unfractionated FPHs, there remains a relatively limited focus on the individual peptides that constitute these complex mixtures. Unearthing and characterizing the bioactive peptides present within these hydrolysates holds substantial promise for their potential ability in disease prevention and management because they may exhibit heightened bioactivity compared to the more complex hydrolysate. Studies reporting on the potential glycaemic management ability of fish derived peptides are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Fish Protein Derived Peptide Sequences with Impacts on in Vitro and in Vivo Markers of Glycaemic Managementa.

    activity
 
fish source peptide sequence in vitro DPP-IV inhibitory activity (IC50 μM) in vivo ref
salmon (Salmo salar) skin TKLPAVF, YLNF 242 and 147 Caco-2 cell monolayer membrane (101)
salmon milt (Oncorhynchus keta) LP, IP, FP 2.7 postprandial hypoglycemic effects (oral starch tolerance) in Sprague–Dawley rats. (104)
salmon frame IPVE, IVDI, VAPEEHPTL, IEGTL   increased glucose uptake (17%) in L6 myocytes, decreased hepatic glucose production in FaO rat hepatocytes (20%) and decreased inflammation (108)
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) GPAE, GPGA 49.6 and 41.9   (105)
halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) SPGSSGPQGFTG, GPVGPAGNPGANGLN, PPGPTGPRGQPGNIGF, IPGDPGPPGPPGP, LPGERGRPGAPGP, GPKGDRGLPGPPGRDGM 65.4 to 146.7   (91)
boarfish muscle (Capros aper) IPVDM 21.72 Caco-2 cell: DPP-IV inhibitory activity (44.6 μM), BRIN-BD11 cells: stimulation of the insulin secretion (107)
Atlantic salmon skin (Salmo salar) LDKVER 128.71   (103)
sturgeon (Acipenser schrencki) skin GPAGERGEGGPR, SPGPDGKTGPR 2140 and 2610   (56)
tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) byproducts DLVDK, PSLVH, LKPT, VAPEEHPT, DLDL, MDLP, VADTMEVV, DPLV, FAMD, CSSGGY, GPFPLLV   Caco-2 cell, DPP-IV inhibitory activity; STC-1 cell, stimulation CCK and GLP-1 secretion, lowered the blood glucose level in mice, enhanced glucose uptake into C2C12 cells (110)
Alaska pollack (Theragra chalcogramma) QWR   lowered the blood glucose level in mice, enhanced glucose uptake into C2C12 cells (113)
a

DPPIV, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV; IC50, half-maximum inhibitory concentration; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; CCK, cholecystokinin. One letter amino acid code used in peptide sequences.

The DPP-IV inhibitory activity of peptides sourced from salmon skin collagen by employing a combined approach involving simulated digestion and the Caco-2 cell monolayer membrane model has been investigated.101 Computational analysis revealed the potential DPP-IV inhibitory nature of TKLPAVF and YLNF. Assessment of their DPP-IV inhibitory potency resulted in IC50 values of 242.10 ± 3.40 and 146.90 ± 4.40 μM for TKLPVAF and YLNF, respectively. Molecular docking analysis highlighted the formation of seven hydrogen bonds between YLNF and DPP-IV residues, suggesting YLNF’s prospective role as a novel DPP-IV inhibitory peptide. Remarkably, YLNF showed the ability to traverse the Caco-2 cell monolayer membrane in an intact form, with an apparent permeability coefficient of 3.54 ± 0.34 × 10–6 cm s–1 at 5 mM.101 The presence of Phe at the C-terminal of the peptide sequence is a characteristic often associated with DPP-IV inhibitory peptides.102 Additionally, the presence of Thr at the N-terminus and Leu at the second position has been recognized as contributing to the DPP-IV inhibitory properties of peptides.101 In another study, a peptide from an Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) skin collagen hydrolysate, LDKVFR, had an in vitro DPP-IV IC50 of 128.71 μM.103 Through molecular docking analysis, it was determined that the inhibition of DPP-IV by LDKVFR was facilitated by six hydrogen bonds and eight hydrophobic interactions between the peptide and DPP-IV.103 Moreover, among the peptides derived from a sturgeon (Acipenser schrencki) skin protein hydrolysate, two peptides demonstrated the most potent in vitro DPP-IV inhibitory activity compared to others. Specifically, GPAGEGEGGPR and SPGPDGKTGPR exhibited DPP-IV IC50 values of 2140 and 2610 μM, respectively.56 Molecular docking analysis further revealed that the DPP-IV inhibitory effect of these two peptides primarily arises from the formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.56

A common approach in these studies was the use of molecular docking analysis to reveal how peptides inhibit DPP-IV activity. In the salmon skin collagen studies, peptides demonstrated their inhibitory capability through the formation of multiple hydrogen bonds with the enzyme. Similarly, in the sturgeon-derived peptides study, the peptides appear to exhibit their potent inhibitory action through the formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. These findings suggest a shared mechanism across different fish-derived peptides, where hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions are crucial in achieving effective DPP-IV inhibition.

A hydrolysate derived from chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) milt exhibited potent inhibitory activity against DPP-IV.104 Additionally, the hypoglycaemic effects of the salmon milt peptides (SMPs) were validated through oral starch tolerance tests conducted on Sprague–Dawley rats. Specifically, rats administered with SMPs at 300 mg/kg body weight over the course of 1 week experienced a notable reduction in blood glucose level 60 min after starch intake compared to the control group. Among the identified peptides, VPI and IPI showed the strongest DPP-IV inhibitory activities, with IC50 values of 2.7 μM.104 Another investigation reported that peptides derived from Atlantic salmon skin gelatin, i.e., GPAE and GPGA, showed in vitro dose-dependent inhibition effects on DPP-IV with IC50 values of 49.6 and 41.9 μM, respectively.105 Both peptides contain Pro as the second residue from the N-terminus, with Ala and Gly positioned adjacent to the Pro residue. Furthermore, these peptide sequences predominantly consisted of hydrophobic AAs, i.e., Ala, Gly and Pro, except for one peptide where the C-terminal residue contained the charged AA, Glu. This arrangement seems to be associated with their DPP-IV inhibitory activity.106

Moreover, research into collagen peptides from halibut and tilapia revealed a range of DPP-IV inhibitory activities, with IC50 values indicating moderate to strong inhibition. Six peptides SPGSSGPQGFTG, GPVGPAGNPGANGLN, PPGPTGPRGQPGNIGF, IPGDPGPPGPPGP, LPGERGRPGAPGP, and GPKGDR LPGPPGRDGM were identified from collagen type I α-2 and α-3 from halibut (Hippoglossus olivaceus) and collagen type I α-1 and α-3 from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).91 The in vitro DPP-IV IC50 values of these peptides ranged from 65.4 to 146.7 μM. The presence of Pro as the second residue from the N-terminus in peptide sequences may be associated with their activity, although this observation warrants further investigation. IPVDM derived from a boarfish (Capros aper) protein hydrolysate showed potent inhibitory activity against DPP-IV with an IC50 of 21.72 ± 1.08 μM in an in vitro assay and 44.26 ± 0.65 μM in a cell-based (Caco-2) DPP-IV inhibition assay. Additionally, this peptide significantly stimulated insulin secretion (1.6-fold increase compared to control) in cultured pancreatic BRIN-BD11 cells.107 Among the food protein-derived peptides, this particular peptide ranks as the third most powerful DPP-IV inhibitor (IC50 of 21.72 ± 1.08 μM in an in vitro assay) discovered, following IPI and VPL with IC50 values of 3.2 and 15.8 μM, respectively.102 The presence of Ile and Pro at positions 1 and 2, along with Val (which shares a similar structure to Ile) at position 3, was associated with the robust DPP-IV inhibitory activity.107 A common structural feature observed in these peptides is the presence of Pro at or near the N-terminus. This characteristic seems to play a crucial role in their ability to inhibit DPP-IV, as evidenced by the peptides described to date from chum salmon, Atlantic salmon, halibut, tilapia and boarfish.

Thirteen peptides from salmon co-products (frames) were identified, chemically synthesized, and tested for their antidiabetic bioactivities. IPVE increased glucose uptake by muscle cells (L6 myocytes), IVDI and IEGTL decreased hepatic glucose production (HGP) of insulin, whereas VAPEEHPTL decreased HGP under both basal conditions and in the presence of insulin in FaO cells from rat hepatoma.108 The peptides identified in this investigation primarily consist of hydrophobic AAs such as Ala, Gly, Ile, Leu, Pro, and Val. Previous research has highlighted the tendency for the AA residues in antidiabetic peptides to be predominantly hydrophobic.109 In fact, a blend of hydrophobic AAs, notably including Ile (2 mM) and supplemented by Cys, Met, Val, and Leu, exhibited the ability to enhance glucose uptake under both basal and insulin-stimulated conditions in isolated rat epitrochlearis muscle.109 Furthermore, Leu exhibited its impact on glucose metabolism through its ability to promote glycogen synthesis by deactivating glycogen synthase kinase-3 in L6 cells.109

Furthermore, 11 novel biopeptides were isolated from a tilapia coproduct protein hydrolysate.110 Among these peptides, three (DLVDK, PSLVH, LKPT) exhibited the ability to stimulate hormonal regulation of CCK and GLP-1 in Caco-2 cell. Moreover, eight peptides (VAPEEHPT, DLDL, MDLP, VADTMEVV, DPLV, FAMD, CSSGGY, GPFPLLV) demonstrated DPP-IV inhibitory activity after successfully passing through the intestinal barrier of a Caco-2 cell monolayer.110 This study also showed the significance of the intestinal barrier’s role in biostability, highlighting its impact on the bioactivity and peptide uptake. DLVDK and PSLVH consist of five AA residues, with some of them incorporating an aliphatic side chain. These results supported the role that the presence of an aliphatic side chain may play a significant role in stimulating CCK seretion in STC-1 cells.111,112

It was observed that a trypsin-digested Alaska pollack protein displayed a reduction in blood glucose levels in KK-Ay mice, a model of type II diabetes.113 ANGEVAQWR from a specific HPLC fraction chosen based on its glucose-lowering activity in an insulin resistance test using ddY mice was isolated. Intraperitoneal administration of ANGEVAQWR (3 mg/kg) led to a decrease in blood glucose level. Among its constituent peptides, the C-terminal tripeptide (QWR, 1 mg/kg), exhibited blood glucose-lowering effects, highlighting the importance of the C-terminal segment for this activity. Furthermore, QWR enhanced glucose uptake into C2C12 cells, a mouse skeletal muscle cell line via an insulin-independent mechanism, and decreased blood glucose levels in diabetic mice.113

Besides in vitro and in situ studies, human intervention studies have shown the positive impacts of bioactive proteins derived from fish in the management of T2DM through reductions in fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), as well as an increase in the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR).114,115

The impact of varying doses of a cod protein hydrolysate (CPH) on postprandial glucose metabolism in older human adults has been explored as impaired glucose regulation affects a significant portion of this population.114 A double-blind crossover trial was conducted, where participants were administered daily doses of CPH at 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg/kg body weight for 1 week with one-week washout periods in between. The results did not demonstrate significant differences in the estimated maximum values of glucose, insulin or GLP-1 between the lowest dose (10 mg/kg BW) and higher doses (20, 30, or 40 mg/kg BW) of CPH. However, a trend was observed where higher doses of CPH seemed to lead to lower serum glucose and insulin levels.114 Furthermore, the effects of fish protein supplementation on glucose and lipid metabolism in thirty-four overweight adults was investigated in an 8-week randomized trial.115 The fish protein intake began at 3 g/d for the initial 4 weeks and increased to 6 g/d for the subsequent 4 weeks. Notably, 8 weeks of fish protein supplementation led to improved fasting glucose level, reduced 2-h postprandial glucose level and decreased glucose-area under the curve (AUC) value in comparison to the control group. Additionally, the glucose-AUC showed a significant decrease after 8 weeks with fish protein supplementation compared to baseline. Noteworthy benefits also included a reduction in LDL-cholesterol (P < 0.05) and favorable changes in body composition, with increased muscle percentage and reduced body fat percentage (P < 0.05) after 4 weeks of supplementation.115 The potential long-term implications of incorporating fish protein into diets warrant further exploration, especially for individuals with low glucose tolerance. Moreover, a double-blind crossover trial involving middle-aged to elderly healthy participants was conducted to examine the impact of CPH ingestion on postprandial glucose metabolism.116 Two separate studies were conducted with a 4- to 7-day interval between them. The participants ingested test samples containing CPH and casein as a control (20 mg/kg body weight) prior to a breakfast meal. The results indicated no discernible distinction in glucose concentration or GLP-1 concentration among the treated groups. However, the postprandial insulin concentration notably decreased in the CPH group when compared to the control group.116 The impact of FPH derived from blue whiting muscle when administered at doses of 1.4 and 2.8 g on various aspects including body weight, body composition and the stimulation of CCK and GLP-1 secretion has been assessed.117 The study involved 120 slightly overweight participants, consisting of 25% males and 75% females. Interestingly, FPH intake correlated with increased levels of CCK and GLP-1 in the blood over 90 days. However, there was no significant difference observed in these parameters between the two different doses of FPH.117

While significant progress has been made through in vitro and animal studies, the number of human studies reported to date remains limited, particularly studying the potential effects of fish protein derived peptides. Further research is needed to fully understand the benefits of these peptides for effective disease management. Gaining a deeper understanding of the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of these peptides to develop effective hypoglycaemic compounds/functional foods and evaluating the in vivo activity and stability of these peptides are key areas for future exploration.

3.3. Muscle Health

Muscle protein is in a constant state of turnover, meaning that protein synthesis is occurring continuously to replace protein lost because of protein breakdown. An abundant availability of all EAAs is a requisite for a significant stimulation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS).118 The BCAAs, Leu, Ile, and Val represent three of the nine EAAs. Leucine is not only a precursor for MPS, but may also play a role as a regulator of intracellular signaling pathways that are involved in the process of protein synthesis.119 MPS will be limited by the lack of availability of any of the EAAs, whereas a shortage of NEAAs can be compensated for by increased de novo production of the deficient NEAAs.118

Skeletal muscle mass is an important body tissue contributing to strength, performance (in sports and daily activities) and metabolic regulation. Several factors, such as calorie deficiency, resistance exercise and aging may affect the MPS to muscle protein breakdown (MPB) ratio. MPS is regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.120

Resistance exercise increases both MPS and MPB, and when a protein-rich meal is given shortly after an exercise session, a net positive protein balance occurs121,122 resulting in muscle growth over time.123125 MPS rates, on the other hand, are reduced and a net negative protein balance occurs during times of energy deficiency126,127 and as people get older128130 resulting in muscle mass loss. However, it has recently been demonstrated that eating a high-protein diet can help to prevent muscle loss during periods of energy deficit and during aging131134 thereby preventing/slowing down the development of sarcopenia in the elderly. Muscle plays an important role in locomotion, force production, glucose disposal135 and metabolic regulation.136 Muscle loss or low muscle level increases the risk of chronic diseases such as metabolic syndrome, type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease.137,138 This is also associated with increased risk of falls139,140 and the inability to perform daily activities,141,142 all of which may lead to a lower quality of life. As a result, maintaining muscle mass throughout one’s life is critical for optimum performance and general health.

According to epidemiological research, the elderly are at a higher risk of not consuming enough high quality protein. Over the age of 50, 32–41% of women and 22–38% of men consume less protein than recommended (RDA for proteins 0.8 g kg1 per day), and nearly no older adult consumes the highest Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) for protein (35% of total energy intake).143 The decreased ability of skeletal muscle in older adults to respond to anabolic stimuli could be caused by several factors. These may include a reduction in physical activity levels,144 increased retention of AAs in the splanchnic area (particularly L), resulting in diminished levels of AAs in the bloodstream,145 a state of chronic low-level inflammation,146,147 decreased expression of AA transporters in skeletal muscle148,149 and weakened anabolic signaling pathways.150,151

Seafood is gaining popularity among consumers and proponents of healthy living because of its high quality protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids, trace mineral and vitamin content.152 Seafood’s highly digestible and high-quality proteins offer the majority of the body’s required and EAAs for muscle health153 as well as energy.154 Furthermore, the existence of bioactive peptides, which may be released during gastrointestinal digestion, is thought to be primarily responsible for the bioactive or biofunctional actions of proteins.14 Bioactive peptides contain sequences of AAs with functional groups that contribute to their biological activity, e.g., having hormone like activity or the ability to modulate the activity of key metabolic pathway enzymes.155

The presence of high-quality protein and a diverse AA profile in blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) prompted an investigation into the potential impacts of three distinct blue whiting protein hydrolysates (BWPHs) on the growth, proliferation and MPS of skeletal muscle myotubes (C2C12).156 The production of the BWPHs involved varying enzymatic and heat exposures, followed by simulated gastrointestinal digestion (SGID), resulting in different degree of hydrolysis (DHs) (ranging from 33.4 to 37.3%) and substantial proportions of low molecular mass peptides. Muscle growth and myotube thickness were evaluated employing an xCelligence platform, revealing that the BWPHs significantly promoted both parameters compared to the negative control (amino acid and serum-free media) (p < 0.01 for muscle growth and p < 0.0001 for myotube thickness). Furthermore, MPS, as measured by puromycin incorporation, was significantly higher after incubation with one of the BWPHs compared with the negative control.156 Moreover, the impact of an SGID-treated sprat (Sprattus sprattus) protein hydrolysate (SPH) on the growth, proliferation and MPS in skeletal muscle (C2C12) myotubes was examined. The SGID-SPH significantly increased myotube growth and thickness compared to the negative control (cells grown in AA and serum-free medium). Puromycin incorporation was also significantly higher after incubation with SPH-SGID compared with the negative control (p < 0.05) indicating the potential ability of SPH to stimulate MPS.157 These in situ studies provide evidence regarding the beneficial impact of fish protein on skeletal muscle hypertrophy and its underlying mechanisms.

Furthermore, several human studies assessed the effects of consuming fish protein hydrolysates on physical performance and muscle mass.158163Table 4 summarized the outcomes of these studies. The role of protein supplementation in conjunction with exercise is addressed by a comprehensive study conducted by Vegge et al., who investigated the potential ergogenic effects of unprocessed whey protein and a hydrolyzed marine protein supplement known as NutriPeptin (Np), in combination with carbohydrate supplementation.158 The study involved trained male cyclists and employed a double-blinded crossover design. Results showed that ingestion of unprocessed whey protein (15.3 g·h–1) along with carbohydrate (60 g·h–1) did not exhibit any significant impact on 5 min mean-power performance after a 120 min cycling session at 50% of maximal aerobic power. In contrast, the hydrolyzed marine protein supplement (Np) (2.7 g·h–1) when combined with a protein-carbohydrate beverage (PROCHO) (12.4 g·h–1 and 60 g·h–1), demonstrated an ergogenic effect on mean-power performance.158 However, another randomized, double-blind crossover design study involved 12 healthy males was conducted in three experimental trials.159 These trials comprised a 90 min cycling task at 50% of predetermined maximum power output, followed by a 5 km time trial (TT). The nutritional interventions were administered at 15 min intervals during the cycling task, encompassing CHO, CHO-PRO (a combination of carbohydrate and whey protein), and CHO–PRO-PEP (incorporating hydrolyzed marine peptides along with carbohydrate and whey protein). It was reported that while the addition of hydrolyzed marine peptides did influence metabolism, as evident from metabolic responses, the ultimate endurance exercise performance, evaluated through a 5 km TT, did not exhibit significant differences across conditions. Therefore, while the presence of hydrolyzed marine peptides seemed to exert an influence on metabolic responses, it did not confer a discernible ergogenic advantage when assessed in the context of 5 km TT performance.159

Table 4. Human Intervention Trials Exploring the Effects of Fish Proteins/Hydrolysates on Skeletal Muscle Health, Function, and Exercise Performance.

marine protein source participants research design key findings ref
Nutripeptin (Np; codfish-based) well-trained male cyclizts (age 22 ± 2 years) randomized, double-blind, crossover trial 5 min mean-power did not differ between groups; blood urea nitrogen significantly increased in treatment group (158)
salmon healthy aerobically trained males, age 23 years randomized, double-blind, crossover design mean 5 km TT time to completion and power output did not differ between trials (159)
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) physically active subjects (6 males, 3 females; age 27 ± 2 years) randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial rapid and pronounced amino acidemia was observed (160)
Atlantic cod fillet (Gadus morhua) 86 participants, 57 women and 29 men. 65 years old and older randomized, double-blind, control trial no difference was found between the intervention and control groups in grip strength and gait speed (161)
fresh frozen meat from Atlantic cod 14 healthy male volunteers a double-blinded crossover there were no significant differences between the two nutrition supplementations measured by time to exhaustion at the cycling sessions (162)
blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassaou) 7 healthy older adults (two males, five females; age: 72 ± 5 randomized, counterbalanced, double-blind design blue whiting protein hydrolysate (BWPH) induced postprandial essential amino acidemia in older adults above the control; insulin was elevated above baseline in BWPH; myotube hypertrophy was greater in BWPH compared with control (163)

Another study aimed to unravel the distinctive postexercise amino acidemia patterns following the consumption of a whey protein hydrolysate (WPH) (0.25 g/kg) and an FPH (0.25 g/kg) in a double-blind, randomized crossover design cohort of nine physically active individuals (six males and three females).160 The results revealed significant elevations in plasma concentrations of TAA, EAA, BCAA, and L at 30 to 60 min following FPH supplementation, as well as at 30 to 120 min following WPH intake compared to the control. No significant differences emerged in plasma TAA, EAA, BCAA, and L concentrations between FPH and WPH at any time point.160 Collectively, these findings highlight the parallel and rapid postexercise amino acidemia triggered by both FPH and WPH, positioning FPH as a promising alternative source of rapidly digested proteins for postresistance exercise utilization. A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to assess the potential benefits of a marine protein hydrolysate (MPH) supplementation (hydrolysate of fresh or fresh-frozen Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fillet) (3 g of protein per day) on physical function and strength among 86 elderly individuals during 12 months.161 No significant differences were found between the intervention and the control groups in terms of the mean change in short physical performance battery (SPPB) or the temporal trend in SPPB, grip strength or gait speed. It was concluded that the participants, notably characterized by their relatively high functional status, possibly encountered a ceiling effect in the SPPB measurement. Additionally, their adequate protein intake and engagement in physical activity might have influenced the outcomes.161 Similarly, another randomized controlled study with cross over design investigated the potential benefits of incorporating FPH in a supplement alongside whey protein (WP) and carbohydrate (CHO) on short-term recovery following high-intensity performance.162 Fourteen healthy male cyclists were engaged in a double-blinded crossover design study consuming nutrition supplementation either containing MPH (hydrolysate of fresh or fresh-frozen Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fillet) or excluding MPH (CHO-WP-MPH or CHO-WP), followed by a 4-h recovery period.162 There were no significant distinctions observed between the two nutrition supplementations in terms of time to exhaustion, heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, blood lactate concentration and glucose levels during the high-intensity performance cycling sessions. This suggests that the incorporation of MPH in the protein supplement failed to exert discernible effects on short-term recovery, when compared to supplementation without MPH.162 While the study’s relatively brief recovery period could be considered a limitation, it may also present a potential advantage for MPH. Protein supplements, including MPH, might offer enhanced benefits in terms of protein synthesis and glycogen replenishment, particularly when recovery time is limited.162

Furthermore, the effects of a protein hydrolysate sourced BWPH on AA levels in the body and muscle growth in C2C12 mouse muscle cells, comparing it with whey protein isolate (WPI) and a control containing nonessential amino acids (NEAA) were assessed.163 The study design involved both ex vivo and in vitro approaches, utilizing blood samples from older adults and treating muscle cells with serum-conditioned media. While both BWPH and WPI triggered essential AA increase in the serum of older adults, this increase was more pronounced with WPI. Insulin levels showed a greater increase with WPI and BWPH compared to the NEAA control. Muscle protein synthesis was enhanced in serum from WPI-fed participants, and it was significantly enhanced on ingestion of WPI and BWPH when compared with ingestion of NEAA. The muscle cells also exhibited greater hypertrophy with WPI and BWPH than with the NEAA.163

These findings underline the potential of FPHs to enhance muscle mass and function, particularly among older adults. While fish-derived proteins hold promise in promoting muscle adaptation, their effects can be influenced by factors such as recovery time and individual functional status. These insights collectively emphasize the significance of fish protein supplementation and dietary interventions in tackling age-related muscle loss. However, the diverse outcomes across studies also underscores the need for further research, considering factors such as protein source, dosage, individual variability and specific exercise protocols. Moving forward, the existing data supports a role for fish proteins/hydrolysates in the improvement of muscle health and offers valuable insights into designing effective nutritional strategies to address muscle health and performance in aging populations.

Certain peptides derived from food proteins may promote the accumulation of skeletal muscle protein, indicating their potential as beneficial agents for muscle health enhancement. Protein hydrolysates, which contain di- and tripeptides, have been shown to alleviate sarcopenia.164 Compared to free AA and intact protein, protein hydrolysates are more efficiently absorbed, with bioactive peptides exhibiting high specificity, efficacy, selectivity, biocompatibility and low immunogenicity.163,165,166 Investigating the effect of fish-derived peptides on muscle health is of significant importance for several reasons. First, fish is known for its high-quality protein content, including bioactive peptides that can support muscle health by providing EAAs necessary for muscle growth, maintenance and repair. These peptides can contribute to muscle recovery and repair by potentially possessing anti-inflammatory properties, aiding in tissue repair and reducing inflammation. Furthermore, fish-derived peptides may stimulate muscle protein synthesis through specific amino acid sequences, activating signaling pathways involved in muscle growth and promoting the production of new muscle proteins. Additionally, these peptides may exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, safeguarding muscle tissue from the damage caused by oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Considering muscle wasting conditions, such as cancer, diabetes, and aging-related disorders, fish-derived peptides with potential anabolic or anticatabolic effects could have therapeutic applications in preserving muscle mass and in mitigating muscle loss.

This review examined the multifaceted roles of FPHs and peptides focusing on their antioxidant properties, glycaemic management capabilities and muscle health benefits. Analysis of the various in vitro, in situ, and in vivo studies published to date indicates the potential applications of these bioactive compounds. It is worth mentioning that while in vitro and small animal in vivo studies have provided valuable information, translating these findings to human health requires comprehensive human intervention trials. In addition, there is a need for further well-designed and controlled human studies involving larger and more diverse populations. This review shows that the mechanisms through which FPHs and specific peptide sequences exert their effects on various physiological processes may be complex and multifaceted, necessitating a more in-depth exploration to establish causality and to elucidate the underlying pathways. Therefore, in order to validate and support the outcomes observed in the current studies, a robust body of evidence from rigorously conducted human intervention trials is essential. Such studies would provide a clearer understanding of the potential benefits, appropriate dosages and the safety profiles of FPHs/peptides in human nutrition and in health promotion.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AA

amino acid

TAA

total amino acid

EAA

essential amino acid

NEAA

nonessential amino acid

BCAA

branch chain amino acid

FPH

fish protein hydrolysate

CPH

cod protein hydrolysate

WPH

whey protein hydrolysate

MPH

marine protein hydrolysate

WPI

whey protein isolate

BWSPH

blue whiting soluble protein hydrolysate

APP

Alaska pollock protein

APF

Alaska pollock frame

SGID

simulated gastrointestinal digestion

ROS

reactive oxygen species

BHA

butylated hydroxyl anisole

DPPH

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

ABTS

2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

ORAC

oxygen radical absorbance capacity

SOD

superoxide dismutase

CAT

catalase

GSH-PX

glutathione peroxidase

GST

glutathione S-transferase

tBOOH

tert-butyl hydroperoxide

TBARS

thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

PUFA

polyunsaturated fatty acid

MPO

myeloperoxidase

MDA

malondialdehyde

EC50

half-maximal effective concentration

IC50

half-maximal inhibitory concentration

T2DM

type 2 diabetes mellitus

DPP-IV

dipeptidyl peptidase-4

GLP-1

glucagon-like peptide-1

GIP

gastric inhibitory polypeptide

CCK

cholecystokinin

HB

hemoglobin

MPS

muscle protein synthesis

MPB

muscle protein breakdown

MyHC

myosin heavy chain

SPPB

short physical performance battery

Author Contributions

N.S.: writing original draft. R.J.F.: conceptualization, reviewing, editing. B.C.: reviewing and editing. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Special Issue

Published as part of Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistryspecial issue “3rd International Symposium on Bioactive Peptides”.

References

  1. Šimat V.; Elabed N.; Kulawik P.; Ceylan Z.; Jamroz E.; Yazgan H.; Čagalj M.; Regenstein J. M.; Özogul F. Recent advances in marine-based nutraceuticals and their health benefits. Marine Drugs. 2020, 18 (12), 627. 10.3390/md18120627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulajfene W.Nutritional and Health Benefits of Marine Mollusks. Marine Biochemistry; CRC Press. p 435–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Harnedy P. A.; Fitzgerald R. J. Bioactive proteins and peptides from macroalgae, fish, shellfish and marine processing waste. Marine proteins and peptides: Biological activities and applications 2013, 5–39. 10.1002/9781118375082.ch2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Murray J, Burt J.. The Composition of Fish. Torry Advisory Note No. 38; Torry Research Station: Aberdeen, UK, 2001.
  5. Pedro S, Nunes M. L.. Reducing salt levels in seafood products. Reducing Salt in Foods; Elsevier; 2019; pp 185–211. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shahidi F.; Varatharajan V.; Peng H.; Senadheera R. Utilization of marine by-products for the recovery of value-added products. Journal of Food Bioactives. 2019, 6, 6184. 10.31665/JFB.2019.6184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao R.; Shen Y.; Shu W.; Bai F.; Jin W.; Wang J.; Yuan L. Optimization of enzymatic conditions of sturgeon muscles and their anti-inflammatory potential. Journal of Food Quality. 2020, 2020, 1–12. 10.1155/2020/9698134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bianchi M, Chopin F, Farme T, Franz N, Fuentevilla C, Garibaldi L, Laurenti A.. FAO: the State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp 1–230.
  9. Ghaly A.; Ramakrishnan V.; Brooks M.; Budge S.; Dave D. Fish processing wastes as a potential source of proteins Amino acids and oils: A Critical Review. Microb Biochem Technol. 2013, 5 (4), 107. 10.4172/2329-6674.1000115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sila A.; Bougatef A. Antioxidant peptides from marine by-products: Isolation, identification and application in food systems. A review. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016, 21, 10–26. 10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Himaya S.; Ngo D.-H.; Ryu B.; Kim S.-K. An active peptide purified from gastrointestinal enzyme hydrolysate of Pacific cod skin gelatin attenuates angiotensin-1 converting enzyme (ACE) activity and cellular oxidative stress. Food Chem. 2012, 132 (4), 1872–82. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.12.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao R.; Yu Q.; Shen Y.; Chu Q.; Chen G.; Fen S.; Yang M.; Yuan L.; McClements D. J.; Sun Q. Production, bioactive properties, and potential applications of fish protein hydrolysates: Developments and challenges. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2021, 110, 687–99. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clare D.; Swaisgood H. Bioactive milk peptides: a prospectus. Journal of dairy science. 2000, 83 (6), 1187–95. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74983-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saadi S.; Saari N.; Anwar F.; Abdul Hamid A.; Ghazali H. M. Recent advances in food biopeptides: Production, biological functionalities and therapeutic applications. Biotechnology advances. 2015, 33, 80–116. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elias R. J.; Kellerby S. S.; Decker E. A. Antioxidant activity of proteins and peptides. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2008, 48 (5), 430–41. 10.1080/10408390701425615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meisel H. Multifunctional peptides encrypted in milk proteins. Biofactors. 2004, 21 (1–4), 55–61. 10.1002/biof.552210111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kristinsson H. G.; Rasco B. A. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2000, 40 (1), 43–81. 10.1080/10408690091189266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi Y. J.; Hur S.; Choi B. D.; Konno K.; Park J. W. Enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered protein from frozen small croaker and functional properties of its hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science. 2009, 74, C17–C24. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dong Yl; Sheng Gy; Fu Jm; Wen Kw. Chemical characterization and anti-anaemia activity of fish protein hydrolysate from Saurida elongata. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2005, 85 (12), 2033–9. 10.1002/jsfa.2219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khantaphant S.; Benjakul S.; Kishimura H. Antioxidative and ACE inhibitory activities of protein hydrolysates from the muscle of brownstripe red snapper prepared using pyloric caeca and commercial proteases. Process Biochemistry. 2011, 46 (1), 318–27. 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nilsang S.; Lertsiri S.; Suphantharika M.; Assavanig A. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of fish soluble concentrate by commercial proteases. Journal of food Engineering. 2005, 70 (4), 571–8. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ovissipour M.; Abedian A.; Motamedzadegan A.; Rasco B.; Safari R.; Shahiri H. The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties of protein hydrolysates from Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) viscera. Food Chem. 2009, 115 (1), 238–42. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pacheco-Aguilar R.; Mazorra-Manzano M. A.; Ramírez-Suárez J. C. Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) muscle produced by a commercial protease. Food chemistry. 2008, 109 (4), 782–9. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sathivel S.; Bechtel P.; Babbitt J.; Smiley S.; Crapo C.; Reppond K.; Prinyawiwatkul W. Biochemical and functional properties of herring (Clupea harengus) byproduct hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science. 2003, 68 (7), 2196–200. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05746.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Souissi N.; Bougatef A.; Triki-Ellouz Y.; Nasri M. Biochemical and functional properties of sardinella (Sardinella aurita) by-product hydrolysates. Food technology and biotechnology. 2007, 45, 187. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chalamaiah M.; Rao G. N.; Rao D. G.; Jyothirmayi T. Protein hydrolysates from meriga (Cirrhinus mrigala) egg and evaluation of their functional properties. Food Chem. 2010, 120 (3), 652–7. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liceaga-Gesualdo A.; Li-Chan E. Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysate from herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of food science. 1999, 64 (6), 1000–4. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb12268.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Abdul-Hamid A.; Bakar J.; Bee G. H. Nutritional quality of spray dried protein hydrolysate from Black Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Food chemistry. 2002, 78 (1), 69–74. 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00380-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gbogouri G.; Linder M.; Fanni J.; Parmentier M. Influence of hydrolysis degree on the functional properties of salmon byproducts hydrolysates. Journal of food science. 2004, 69, C615. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09909.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thiansilakul Y.; Benjakul S.; Shahidi F. Compositions, functional properties and antioxidative activity of protein hydrolysates prepared from round scad (Decapterus maruadsi). Food chemistry. 2007, 103 (4), 1385–94. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Foh M.; Kamara M.; Amadou I.; Foh B.; Xia W. Chemical and physicochemical properties of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish protein hydrolysate and concentrate. International journal of Biological chemistry. 2010, 5, 21. 10.3923/ijbc.2011.21.36. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bueno-Solano C.; López-Cervantes J.; Campas-Baypoli O.; Lauterio-García R.; Adan-Bante N.; Sánchez-Machado D. Chemical and biological characteristics of protein hydrolysates from fermented shrimp by-products. Food chemistry. 2009, 112 (3), 671–5. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazorra-Manzano M. A.; Pacheco-Aguilar R.; Ramírez-Suárez J. C.; Garcia-Sanchez G.; Lugo-Sánchez M. E. Endogenous proteases in Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) muscle as a processing aid in functional fish protein hydrolysate production. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2012, 5, 130–7. 10.1007/s11947-010-0374-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yin H.; Pu J.; Wan Y.; Xiang B.; Bechtel P. J.; Sathivel S. Rheological and functional properties of catfish skin protein hydrolysates. Journal of food science. 2010, 75, E11 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01385.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hou H.; Li B.; Zhao X.; Zhang Z.; Li P. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Alaska pollock frame for preparing protein hydrolysates with low-bitterness. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2011, 44 (2), 421–8. 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Benjakul S.; Yarnpakdee S.; Senphan T.; Halldorsdottir S. M.; Kristinsson H. G. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, bioactivities, and applications. Antioxidants and functional components in aquatic foods. 2014, 237–81. 10.1002/9781118855102.ch9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Möller N. P.; Scholz-Ahrens K. E.; Roos N.; Schrezenmeir J. Bioactive peptides and proteins from foods: indication for health effects. European journal of nutrition. 2008, 47 (4), 171–82. 10.1007/s00394-008-0710-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fang Y.-Z.; Yang S.; Wu G. Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition. 2002, 18 (10), 872–9. 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00916-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Guiotto A.; Calderan A.; Ruzza P.; Borin G. Carnosine and carnosine-related antioxidants: a review. Current medicinal chemistry. 2005, 12 (20), 2293–315. 10.2174/0929867054864796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seth A.; Mahoney R. R. Iron chelation by digests of insoluble chicken muscle protein: the role of histidine residues. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2001, 81 (2), 183–7. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Garner B.; Witting P. K.; Waldeck A. R.; Christison J. K.; Raftery M.; Stocker R. Oxidation of high density lipoproteins: I. formation of methionine sulfoxide in apolipoproteins AI and AII is an early event that accompanies lipid peroxidation and can be enhanced by α-tocopherol. Journal of biological chemistry. 1998, 273 (11), 6080–7. 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pryor W. A.; Jin X.; Squadrito G. L. One-and two-electron oxidations of methionine by peroxynitrite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994, 91 (23), 11173–7. 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Guérard F.; Sumaya-Martinez M. T. Antioxidant effects of protein hydrolysates in the reaction with glucose. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 2003, 80, 467. 10.1007/s11746-003-0721-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Egerton S.; Culloty S.; Whooley J.; Stanton C.; Ross R. P. Characterization of protein hydrolysates from blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) and their application in beverage fortification. Food chemistry. 2018, 245, 698–706. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ighodaro O.; Akinloye O. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alexandria journal of medicine. 2018, 54 (4), 287–93. 10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Heffernan S.; Harnedy-Rothwell P. A.; Gite S.; Whooley J.; Giblin L.; Fitzgerald R. J.; O’Brien N. M. Blue whiting protein hydrolysates exhibit antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities in stimulated murine RAW264. 7 cells. Applied Sciences. 2021, 11 (20), 9762. 10.3390/app11209762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Je J.-Y.; Park P.-J.; Kim S.-K. Antioxidant activity of a peptide isolated from Alaska pollack (Theragra chalcogramma) frame protein hydrolysate. Food Research International. 2005, 38 (1), 45–50. 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wong F.-C.; Xiao J.; Michelle G.; Ong L.; Pang M.-J.; Wong S.-J.; Teh L.-K.; Chai T.-T. Identification and characterization of antioxidant peptides from hydrolysate of blue-spotted stingray and their stability against thermal, pH and simulated gastrointestinal digestion treatments. Food chemistry. 2019, 271, 614. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang X.-R.; Zhang L.; Ding D.-G.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B.; Huo J.-C. Preparation, identification, and activity evaluation of eight antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of hairtail (Trichiurus japonicas) muscle. Marine Drugs. 2019, 17 (1), 23. 10.3390/md17010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Farvin K. H. S.; Andersen L. L.; Otte J.; Nielsen H. H.; Jessen F.; Jacobsen C. Antioxidant activity of cod (Gadus morhua) protein hydrolysates: Fractionation and characterisation of peptide fractions. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 409. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Feng Y.-X.; Ruan G.-R.; Jin F.; Xu J.; Wang F.-J. Purification, identification, and synthesis of five novel antioxidant peptides from Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume) protein hydrolysates. Lwt. 2018, 92, 40–6. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Orsini Delgado M. C.; Nardo A.; Pavlovic M.; Rogniaux H.; Añón M. C.; Tironi V. A. Identification and characterization of antioxidant peptides obtained by gastrointestinal digestion of amaranth proteins. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 1160. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang Q.; Cai X.; Yan A.; Tian Y.; Du M.; Wang S. A specific antioxidant peptide: Its properties in controlling oxidation and possible action mechanism. Food chemistry. 2020, 327, 126984. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim S. S.; Ahn C.-B.; Moon S. W.; Je J.-Y. Purification and antioxidant activities of peptides from sea squirt (Halocynthia roretzi) protein hydrolysates using pepsin hydrolysis. Food Bioscience. 2018, 25, 128–33. 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang W.; De Mejia E. G. A new frontier in soy bioactive peptides that may prevent age-related chronic diseases. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. 2005, 4 (4), 63–78. 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2005.tb00075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gui M.; Gao L.; Rao L.; Li P.; Zhang Y.; Han J. W.; Li J. Bioactive peptides identified from enzymatic hydrolysates of sturgeon skin. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2022, 102 (5), 1948–57. 10.1002/jsfa.11532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Cai B.; Wan P.; Chen H.; Huang J.; Ye Z.; Chen D.; Pan J. Purification and identification of novel myeloperoxidase inhibitory antioxidant peptides from tuna (Thunnas albacares) protein hydrolysates. Molecules. 2022, 27 (9), 2681. 10.3390/molecules27092681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Giménez B.; Alemán A.; Montero P.; Gómez-Guillén M. Antioxidant and functional properties of gelatin hydrolysates obtained from skin of sole and squid. Food Chem. 2009, 114 (3), 976–83. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhu C.-Z.; Zhang W.-G.; Zhou G.-H.; Xu X.-L.; Kang Z.-L.; Yin Y. Isolation and identification of antioxidant peptides from Jinhua ham. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2013, 61 (6), 1265–71. 10.1021/jf3044764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hu X.; Yang X.; Wang T.; Li L.; Wu Y.; Zhou Y.; You L. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from round scad (Decapterus maruadsi) hydrolysates by consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 135, 110882. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang X.-R.; Zhao Y.-Q.; Qiu Y.-T.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B. Preparation and characterization of gelatin and antioxidant peptides from gelatin hydrolysate of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) bone stimulated by in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Marine drugs. 2019, 17 (2), 78. 10.3390/md17020078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Han J.; Huang Z.; Tang S.; Lu C.; Wan H.; Zhou J.; Li Y.; Ming T.; Wang Z. J.; Su X. The novel peptides ICRD and LCGEC screened from tuna roe show antioxidative activity via Keap1/Nrf2-ARE pathway regulation and gut microbiota modulation. Food chemistry. 2020, 327, 127094. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tao J.; Zhao Y.-Q.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B. Bioactive peptides from cartilage protein hydrolysate of spotless smoothhound and their antioxidant activity in vitro. Marine drugs. 2018, 16 (4), 100. 10.3390/md16040100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang W.-Y.; Zhao Y.-Q.; Zhao G.-X.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B. Antioxidant peptides from collagen hydrolysate of redlip croaker (Pseudosciaena polyactis) scales: Preparation, characterization, and cytoprotective effects on H2O2-damaged HepG2 cells. Marine Drugs. 2020, 18 (3), 156. 10.3390/md18030156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mendis E.; Rajapakse N.; Kim S.-K. Antioxidant properties of a radical-scavenging peptide purified from enzymatically prepared fish skin gelatin hydrolysate. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2005, 53 (3), 581–7. 10.1021/jf048877v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hu X.-M.; Wang Y.-M.; Zhao Y.-Q.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B. Antioxidant peptides from the protein hydrolysate of monkfish (Lophius litulon) muscle: Purification, identification, and cytoprotective function on HepG2 cells damage by H2O2. Marine drugs. 2020, 18 (3), 153. 10.3390/md18030153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang X.; Yu H.; Xing R.; Liu S.; Chen X.; Li P. Preparation and identification of antioxidative peptides from pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) protein. Molecules. 2019, 24 (10), 1946. 10.3390/molecules24101946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nalinanon S.; Benjakul S.; Kishimura H.; Shahidi F. Functionalities and antioxidant properties of protein hydrolysates from the muscle of ornate threadfin bream treated with pepsin from skipjack tuna. Food chemistry. 2011, 124 (4), 1354–62. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu R.; Wu C.; Liu D.; Yang X.; Huang J.; Zhang J.; Liao B.; He H. Antioxidant and anti-freezing peptides from salmon collagen hydrolysate prepared by bacterial extracellular protease. Food Chem. 2018, 248, 346–52. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Guru A.; Lite C.; Freddy A. J.; Issac P. K.; Pasupuleti M.; Saraswathi N.; Arasu M. V.; Al-Dhabi N. A.; Arshad A.; Arockiaraj J. Intracellular ROS scavenging and antioxidant regulation of WL15 from cysteine and glycine-rich protein 2 demonstrated in zebrafish in vivo model. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2021, 114, 103863. 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pownall T. L.; Udenigwe C. C.; Aluko R. E. Amino acid composition and antioxidant properties of pea seed (Pisum sativum L.) enzymatic protein hydrolysate fractions. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2010, 58 (8), 4712–8. 10.1021/jf904456r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sarmadi B. H.; Ismail A. Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: A review. Peptides. 2010, 31 (10), 1949–56. 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nazeer R.; Kumar N. S.; Ganesh R. J. In vitro and in vivo studies on the antioxidant activity of fish peptide isolated from the croaker (Otolithes ruber) muscle protein hydrolysate. Peptides. 2012, 35, 261. 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hu J.; Liu R.; Yu X.; Li Z.; Liu X.; Hao Y.; Zhu N.; Kang J.; Li Y. Protective effects of small-molecule oligopeptides isolated from tilapia fish scale on ethanol-induced gastroduodenal injury in rats. Nutrients. 2021, 13 (6), 2078. 10.3390/nu13062078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Update of Mortality Attributable to Diabetes for the IDF Diabetes Atlas: Estimates for the Year 2013 IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  76. Newsholme P.; Krause M. Nutritional regulation of insulin secretion: implications for diabetes. Clinical Biochemist Reviews 2012, 33, 35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Oseguera-Toledo M. E.; González de Mejía E.; Reynoso-Camacho R.; Cardador-Martínez A.; Amaya-Llano S. L. Proteins and bioactive peptides: mechanisms of action on diabetes management. Nutrafoods. 2014, 13, 147–57. 10.1007/s13749-014-0052-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ranawana V.; Kaur B. Role of proteins in insulin secretion and glycemic control. Advances in food and nutrition research. 2013, 70, 1–47. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416555-7.00001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Chelliah R.; Wei S.; Daliri E. B.-M.; Elahi F.; Yeon S. J.; Tyagi A.; Liu S.; Madar I. H.; Sultan G.; Oh D. H. The Role of Bioactive Peptides in Diabetes and Obesity. Foods 2021, 10, 2220. 10.3390/foods10092220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Entezari M.; Hashemi D.; Taheriazam A.; Zabolian A.; Mohammadi S.; Fakhri F.; Hashemi M.; Hushmandi K.; Ashrafizadeh M.; Zarrabi A.; Ertas Y. N.; Mirzaei S.; Samarghandian S. AMPK signaling in diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and diabetic complications: A pre-clinical and clinical investigation. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2022, 146, 112563. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Cheung R. C. F.; Ng T. B.; Wong J. H. Marine peptides: Bioactivities and applications. Marine drugs. 2015, 13 (7), 4006–43. 10.3390/md13074006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Venkatesan J.; Anil S.; Kim S.-K.; Shim M. S. Marine fish proteins and peptides for cosmeceuticals: A review. Marine drugs. 2017, 15 (5), 143. 10.3390/md15050143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Shoulders M. D.; Raines R. T. Collagen structure and stability. Annual review of biochemistry. 2009, 78, 929–58. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.032207.120833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lauritano C.; Ianora A. Marine organisms with anti-diabetes properties. Marine drugs. 2016, 14 (12), 220. 10.3390/md14120220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sharkey S. J.; Harnedy-Rothwell P. A.; Allsopp P. J.; Hollywood L. E.; FitzGerald R. J.; O’Harte F. P. A narrative review of the anti-hyperglycemic and satiating effects of fish protein hydrolysates and their bioactive peptides. Molecular nutrition & food research. 2020, 64, 2000403. 10.1002/mnfr.202000403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Harnedy P. A.; Parthsarathy V.; McLaughlin C. M.; O’Keeffe M. B.; Allsopp P. J.; McSorley E. M.; O’Harte F. P.; FitzGerald R. J. Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) muscle protein hydrolysate with in vitro and in vivo antidiabetic properties. Journal of Functional Foods. 2018, 40, 137–45. 10.1016/j.jff.2017.10.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Parthsarathy V.; McLaughlin C. M.; Harnedy P. A.; Allsopp P. J.; Crowe W.; McSorley E. M.; FitzGerald R. J.; O’Harte F. P. Boarfish (Capros aper) protein hydrolysate has potent insulinotropic and GLP-1 secretory activity in vitro and acute glucose lowering effects in mice. International journal of food science & technology. 2019, 54 (1), 271–81. 10.1111/ijfs.13975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Iba Y.; Yokoi K.; Eitoku I.; Goto M.; Koizumi S.; Sugihara F.; Oyama H.; Yoshimoto T. Oral administration of collagen hydrolysates improves glucose tolerance in normal mice through GLP-1-dependent and GLP-1-independent mechanisms. Journal of medicinal food. 2016, 19 (9), 836–43. 10.1089/jmf.2016.3711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Cudennec B.; Fouchereau-Peron M.; Ferry F.; Duclos E.; Ravallec R. In vitro and in vivo evidence for a satiating effect of fish protein hydrolysate obtained from blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) muscle. Journal of Functional Foods. 2012, 4 (1), 271–7. 10.1016/j.jff.2011.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Cudennec B.; Balti R.; Ravallec R.; Caron J.; Bougatef A.; Dhulster P.; Nedjar N. In vitro evidence for gut hormone stimulation release and dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitory activity of protein hydrolysate obtained from cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) viscera. Food Research International. 2015, 78, 238–45. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang T.-Y.; Hsieh C.-H.; Hung C.-C.; Jao C.-L.; Chen M.-C.; Hsu K.-C. Fish skin gelatin hydrolysates as dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 stimulators improve glycaemic control in diabetic rats: A comparison between warm-and cold-water fish. Journal of Functional Foods. 2015, 19, 330–40. 10.1016/j.jff.2015.09.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Guo L.; Harnedy P. A.; Zhang L.; Li B.; Zhang Z.; Hou H.; Zhao X.; FitzGerald R. J. In vitro assessment of the multifunctional bioactive potential of Alaska pollock skin collagen following simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2015, 95 (7), 1514–20. 10.1002/jsfa.6854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Neves A. C.; Harnedy P. A.; O’Keeffe M. B.; FitzGerald R. J. Bioactive peptides from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with angiotensin converting enzyme and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory, and antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 396–405. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Neves A.; Harnedy P.; O’Keeffe M.; Alashi M.; Aluko R.; FitzGerald R. Antihypertensive, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory and antioxidant activities of salmon gelatin derived peptides. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 112–20. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Cheung I. W.; Li-Chan E. C. Enzymatic production of protein hydrolysates from steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) skin gelatin as inhibitors of dipeptidyl-peptidase IV and angiotensin-I converting enzyme. Journal of Functional Foods. 2017, 28, 254–64. 10.1016/j.jff.2016.10.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ketnawa S.; Suwal S.; Huang J. Y.; Liceaga A. M. Selective separation and characterisation of dual ACE and DPP-IV inhibitory peptides from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) protein hydrolysates. International journal of food science & technology. 2019, 54 (4), 1062–73. 10.1111/ijfs.13939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rivero-Pino F.; Espejo-Carpio F. J.; Guadix E. M. Production and identification of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory peptides from discarded Sardine pilchardus protein. Food chemistry. 2020, 328, 127096. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Reimann F.; Williams L.; da Silva Xavier G.; Rutter G.; Gribble F. Glutamine potently stimulates glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from GLUTag cells. Diabetologia. 2004, 47, 1592–601. 10.1007/s00125-004-1498-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Day C.; Bailey C. J. Obesity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease. 2011, 11 (2), 55–61. 10.1177/1474651411407418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Roblet C.; Akhtar M. J.; Mikhaylin S.; Pilon G.; Gill T.; Marette A.; Bazinet L. Enhancement of glucose uptake in muscular cell by peptide fractions separated by electrodialysis with filtration membrane from salmon frame protein hydrolysate. Journal of Functional Foods. 2016, 22, 337–46. 10.1016/j.jff.2016.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Ritian J.; Teng X.; Liao M.; Zhang L.; Wei Z.; Meng R.; Liu N. Release of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory peptides from salmon (Salmo salar) skin collagen based on digestion–intestinal absorption in vitro. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2021, 56 (7), 3507–18. 10.1111/ijfs.14977. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Nongonierma A. B.; FitzGerald R. J. Features of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory peptides from dietary proteins. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2019, 43 (1), e12451 10.1111/jfbc.12451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Jin R.; Teng X.; Shang J.; Wang D.; Liu N. Identification of novel DPP–IV inhibitory peptides from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) skin. Food Research International. 2020, 133, 109161. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Takahashi Y.; Kamata A.; Konishi T. Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitory peptides derived from salmon milt and their effects on postprandial blood glucose level. Fisheries Science. 2021, 87 (4), 619–26. 10.1007/s12562-021-01530-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Li-Chan E. C.; Hunag S.-L.; Jao C.-L.; Ho K.-P.; Hsu K.-C. Peptides derived from Atlantic salmon skin gelatin as dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2012, 60 (4), 973–8. 10.1021/jf204720q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Pieter Boots J.-W.Protein hydrolysate enriched in peptides inhibiting DPP-IV and their use. US20090075904A1, 2009.
  107. Harnedy-Rothwell P. A.; McLaughlin C. M.; O'Keeffe M. B.; Le Gouic A. V.; Allsopp P. J.; McSorley E. M.; Sharkey S.; Whooley J.; McGovern B.; O'Harte F. P.M.; FitzGerald R. J. Identification and characterisation of peptides from a boarfish (Capros aper) protein hydrolysate displaying in vitro dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory and insulinotropic activity. Food Research International. 2020, 131, 108989. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.108989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Henaux L.; Pereira K. D.; Thibodeau J.; Pilon G.; Gill T.; Marette A.; Bazinet L. Glucoregulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of peptide fractions separated by electrodialysis with ultrafiltration membranes from salmon protein hydrolysate and identification of four novel glucoregulatory peptides. Membranes. 2021, 11 (7), 528. 10.3390/membranes11070528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pangestuti R.; Kim S.-K. Bioactive peptide of marine origin for the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases. Marine Drugs. 2017, 15 (3), 67. 10.3390/md15030067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Theysgeur S.; Cudennec B.; Deracinois B.; Perrin C.; Guiller I.; Lepoudère A.; Flahaut C.; Ravallec R. New bioactive peptides identified from a tilapia byproduct hydrolysate exerting effects on DPP-IV activity and intestinal hormones regulation after canine gastrointestinal simulated digestion. Molecules. 2021, 26 (1), 136. 10.3390/molecules26010136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Tulipano G.; Faggi L.; Cacciamali A.; Caroli A. M. Whey protein-derived peptide sensing by enteroendocrine cells compared with osteoblast-like cells: Role of peptide length and peptide composition, focussing on products of β-lactoglobulin hydrolysis. International Dairy Journal. 2017, 72, 55–62. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Santos-Hernández M.; Amigo L.; Recio I. Induction of CCK and GLP-1 release in enteroendocrine cells by egg white peptides generated during gastrointestinal digestion. Food chemistry. 2020, 329, 127188. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ayabe T.; Mizushige T.; Ota W.; Kawabata F.; Hayamizu K.; Han L.; Tsuji T.; Kanamoto R.; Ohinata K. A novel Alaska pollack-derived peptide, which increases glucose uptake in skeletal muscle cells, lowers the blood glucose level in diabetic mice. Food & function. 2015, 6 (8), 2749–57. 10.1039/C5FO00401B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Jensen C.; Dale H. F.; Hausken T.; Lied E.; Hatlebakk J. G.; Brønstad I.; Lied G. A.; Hoff D. A. L. Supplementation with cod protein hydrolysate in older adults: a dose range cross-over study. J. Nutr Sci. 2019, 8, e40 10.1017/jns.2019.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Vikøren L. A.; Nygård O. K.; Lied E.; Rostrup E.; Gudbrandsen O. A. A randomised study on the effects of fish protein supplement on glucose tolerance, lipids and body composition in overweight adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109 (4), 648–57. 10.1017/S0007114512001717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Dale H. F.; Jensen C.; Hausken T.; Lied E.; Hatlebakk J. G.; Brønstad I.; Lihaug Hoff D. A.; Lied G. A. Effect of a cod protein hydrolysate on postprandial glucose metabolism in healthy subjects: A double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of nutritional science. 2018, 7, e33 10.1017/jns.2018.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Nobile V.; Duclos E.; Michelotti A.; Bizzaro G.; Negro M.; Soisson F. Supplementation with a fish protein hydrolysate (Micromesistius poutassou): effects on body weight, body composition, and CCK/GLP-1 secretion. Food & nutrition research. 2016, 60 (1), 29857. 10.3402/fnr.v60.29857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Volpi E.; Kobayashi H.; Sheffield-Moore M.; Mittendorfer B.; Wolfe R. R. Essential amino acids are primarily responsible for the amino acid stimulation of muscle protein anabolism in healthy elderly adults. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2003, 78 (2), 250–8. 10.1093/ajcn/78.2.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Blomstrand E.; Eliasson J.; Karlsson H. K.; Köhnke R. Branched-chain amino acids activate key enzymes in protein synthesis after physical exercise. Journal of nutrition. 2006, 136 (1), 269S–73S. 10.1093/jn/136.1.269S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Laplante M.; Sabatini D. M. mTOR signaling at a glance. Journal of cell science. 2009, 122 (20), 3589–94. 10.1242/jcs.051011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Tipton K. D.; Elliott T. A.; Cree M. G.; Aarsland A. A.; Sanford A. P.; Wolfe R. R. Stimulation of net muscle protein synthesis by whey protein ingestion before and after exercise. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007, 292, E71. 10.1152/ajpendo.00166.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilkinson S. B.; Tarnopolsky M. A.; MacDonald M. J.; MacDonald J. R.; Armstrong D.; Phillips S. M. Consumption of fluid skim milk promotes greater muscle protein accretion after resistance exercise than does consumption of an isonitrogenous and isoenergetic soy-protein beverage. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2007, 85 (4), 1031–40. 10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Esmarck B.; Andersen J.; Olsen S.; Richter E.; Mizuno M.; Kjaer M. Timing of postexercise protein intake is important for muscle hypertrophy with resistance training in elderly humans. Journal of physiology. 2001, 535 (1), 301–11. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00301.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Hartman J. W.; Tang J. E.; Wilkinson S. B.; Tarnopolsky M. A.; Lawrence R. L.; Fullerton A. V.; Phillips S. M. Consumption of fat-free fluid milk after resistance exercise promotes greater lean mass accretion than does consumption of soy or carbohydrate in young, novice, male weightlifters. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2007, 86 (2), 373–81. 10.1093/ajcn/86.2.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Cermak N. M.; Res P. T.; de Groot L. C.; Saris W. H.; van Loon L. J. Protein supplementation augments the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training: a meta-analysis. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2012, 96 (6), 1454–64. 10.3945/ajcn.112.037556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Pasiakos S. M.; Vislocky L. M.; Carbone J. W.; Altieri N.; Konopelski K.; Freake H. C.; Anderson J. M.; Ferrando A. A.; Wolfe R. R.; Rodriguez N. R. Acute energy deprivation affects skeletal muscle protein synthesis and associated intracellular signaling proteins in physically active adults. Journal of nutrition. 2010, 140 (4), 745–51. 10.3945/jn.109.118372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Areta J. L.; Burke L. M.; Camera D. M.; West D. W.; Crawshay S.; Moore D. R.; Stellingwerff T.; Phillips S. M.; Hawley J. A.; Coffey V. G. Reduced resting skeletal muscle protein synthesis is rescued by resistance exercise and protein ingestion following short-term energy deficit. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014, 306, E989. 10.1152/ajpendo.00590.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Volpi E.; Mittendorfer B.; Rasmussen B. B.; Wolfe R. R. The response of muscle protein anabolism to combined hyperaminoacidemia and glucose-induced hyperinsulinemia is impaired in the elderly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2000, 85, 4481. 10.1210/jcem.85.12.7021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Cuthbertson D.; Smith K.; Babraj J.; Leese G.; Waddell T.; Atherton P.; Wackerhage H.; Taylor P. M.; Rennie M. J. Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle. FASEB Journal. 2005, 19 (3), 1–22. 10.1096/fj.04-2640fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Phillips S. M. Physiologic and molecular bases of muscle hypertrophy and atrophy: impact of resistance exercise on human skeletal muscle (protein and exercise dose effects). Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism. 2009, 34 (3), 403–10. 10.1139/H09-042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Houston D. K.; Nicklas B. J.; Ding J.; Harris T. B.; Tylavsky F. A.; Newman A. B.; Lee J. S.; Sahyoun N. R.; Visser M.; Kritchevsky S. B. Dietary protein intake is associated with lean mass change in older, community-dwelling adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008, 87 (1), 150–5. 10.1093/ajcn/87.1.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Josse A. R.; Atkinson S. A.; Tarnopolsky M. A.; Phillips S. M. Increased consumption of dairy foods and protein during diet-and exercise-induced weight loss promotes fat mass loss and lean mass gain in overweight and obese premenopausal women. Journal of nutrition. 2011, 141 (9), 1626–34. 10.3945/jn.111.141028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wycherley T. P.; Moran L. J.; Clifton P. M.; Noakes M.; Brinkworth G. D. Effects of energy-restricted high-protein, low-fat compared with standard-protein, low-fat diets: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2012, 96 (6), 1281–98. 10.3945/ajcn.112.044321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Geirsdottir O. G.; Arnarson A.; Ramel A.; Jonsson P. V.; Thorsdottir I. Dietary protein intake is associated with lean body mass in community-dwelling older adults. Nutr. Res. (N.Y.) 2013, 33 (8), 608–12. 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. DeFronzo R. A.; Bonadonna R. C.; Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM: a balanced overview. Diabetes care. 1992, 15 (3), 318–68. 10.2337/diacare.15.3.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Karagounis L. G.; Hawley J. A. Skeletal muscle: increasing the size of the locomotor cell. international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2010, 42 (9), 1376–9. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Jurca R.; Lamonte M. J.; Barlow C. E.; Kampert J. B.; Church T. S.; Blair S. N. Association of muscular strength with incidence of metabolic syndrome in men. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2005, 37 (11), 1849. 10.1249/01.mss.0000175865.17614.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wolfe R. R. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2006, 84 (3), 475–82. 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Landi F.; Liperoti R.; Russo A.; Giovannini S.; Tosato M.; Capoluongo E.; Bernabei R.; Onder G. Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls in elderly individuals: results from the ilSIRENTE study. Clinical nutrition. 2012, 31 (5), 652–8. 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Scott D.; Hayes A.; Sanders K. M.; Aitken D.; Ebeling P. R.; Jones G. Operational definitions of sarcopenia and their associations with 5-year changes in falls risk in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults. Osteoporosis international. 2014, 25 (1), 187–93. 10.1007/s00198-013-2431-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Velasquez Alva M. d. C.; Irigoyen Camacho M. E.; Delgadillo Velázquez J.; Lazarevich I. The relationship between sarcopenia, undernutrition, physical mobility and basic activities of daily living in a group of elderly women of Mexico City. Nutricion hospitalaria. 2013, 28, 514. 10.3305/nh.2013.28.2.6180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Salmazo da Silva H.; de Oliveira Duarte Y.; Bof de Andrade F.; de Abreu Ramos Cerqueira A. T.; Ferreira Santos J. L.; Lebrão M. L. Factores de rendimiento cognitivo superior a la media en personas de edad avanzada: estudio SABE. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014, 30, 1977. 10.1590/0102-311X00131913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Calvani R.; Miccheli A.; Landi F.; Bossola M.; Cesari M.; Leeuwenburgh C.; Sieber C. C.; Bernabei R.; Marzetti E. Current nutritional recommendations and novel dietary strategies to manage sarcopenia. Journal of frailty & aging. 2013, 2, 38. 10.14283/jfa.2013.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Breen L.; Stokes K. A.; Churchward-Venne T. A.; Moore D. R.; Baker S. K.; Smith K.; Atherton P. J.; Phillips S. M. Two weeks of reduced activity decreases leg lean mass and induces “anabolic resistance” of myofibrillar protein synthesis in healthy elderly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013, 98 (6), 2604–12. 10.1210/jc.2013-1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Boirie Y.; Gachon P.; Beaufrere B. Splanchnic and whole-body leucine kinetics in young and elderly men. American journal of clinical nutrition. 1997, 65 (2), 489–95. 10.1093/ajcn/65.2.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Dalle S.; Rossmeislova L.; Koppo K. The role of inflammation in age-related sarcopenia. Frontiers in physiology. 2017, 8, 1045. 10.3389/fphys.2017.01045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Franceschi C.; Garagnani P.; Parini P.; Giuliani C.; Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2018, 14 (10), 576–90. 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Dickinson J. M.; Drummond M. J.; Coben J. R.; Volpi E.; Rasmussen B. B. Aging differentially affects human skeletal muscle amino acid transporter expression when essential amino acids are ingested after exercise. Clinical nutrition. 2013, 32 (2), 273–80. 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Drummond M. J.; Fry C. S.; Glynn E. L.; Timmerman K. L.; Dickinson J. M.; Walker D. K.; Gundermann D. M.; Volpi E.; Rasmussen B. B. Skeletal muscle amino acid transporter expression is increased in young and older adults following resistance exercise. Journal of applied physiology. 2011, 111 (1), 135–42. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01408.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Traylor D. A.; Gorissen S. H.; Phillips S. M. Perspective: protein requirements and optimal intakes in aging: are we ready to recommend more than the recommended daily allowance?. Advances in nutrition. 2018, 9 (3), 171–82. 10.1093/advances/nmy003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Burd N. A.; Gorissen S. H.; Van Loon L. J. Anabolic resistance of muscle protein synthesis with aging. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2013, 41 (3), 169–73. 10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3d5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Hosomi R.; Yoshida M.; Fukunaga K. Seafood consumption and components for health. Global journal of health science. 2012, 4, 72. 10.5539/gjhs.v4n3p72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Lees M. J.; Carson B. P. The potential role of fish-derived protein hydrolysates on metabolic health, skeletal muscle mass and function in ageing. Nutrients. 2020, 12 (8), 2434. 10.3390/nu12082434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Chalamaiah M.; Yu W.; Wu J. Immunomodulatory and anticancer protein hydrolysates (peptides) from food proteins: A review. Food chemistry. 2018, 245, 205–22. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Dale H. F.; Jensen C.; Hausken T.; Lied E.; Hatlebakk J. G.; Brønstad I.; Lihaug Hoff D. A.; Lied G. A. Effect of a cod protein hydrolysate on postprandial glucose metabolism in healthy subjects: a double-blind cross-over trial. Journal of nutritional science. 2018, 7, 7e33. 10.1017/jns.2018.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Shekoohi N.; Amigo-Benavent M.; Wesley Peixoto da Fonseca G.; Harnedy-Rothwell P. A.; FitzGerald R. J.; Carson B. P. A Cell-Based Assessment of the Muscle Anabolic Potential of Blue Whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) Protein Hydrolysates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023, 24 (3), 2001. 10.3390/ijms24032001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Shekoohi N.; Naik A. S.; Amigo-Benavent M.; Harnedy-Rothwell P. A.; Carson B. P.; FitzGerald R. J. Physicochemical, technofunctional, in vitro antioxidant, and in situ muscle protein synthesis properties of a sprat (Sprattus sprattus) protein hydrolysate. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2023, 10, 1197274. 10.3389/fnut.2023.1197274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Vegge G.; Rønnestad B. R.; Ellefsen S. Improved cycling performance with ingestion of hydrolyzed marine protein depends on performance level. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2012, 9, 14. 10.1186/1550-2783-9-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Siegler J. C.; Page R.; Turner M.; Mitchell N.; Midgely A. W. The effect of carbohydrate and marine peptide hydrolysate co-ingestion on endurance exercise metabolism and performance. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2013, 10, 1. 10.1186/1550-2783-10-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Cordeiro E. M.; de Oliveira G. V.; Volino-Souza M.; Velozo O. d. C.; Alvares T. S. Effects of fish protein hydrolysate ingestion on postexercise aminoacidemia compared with whey protein hydrolysate in young individuals. Journal of food science. 2020, 85, 21. 10.1111/1750-3841.14970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Nygård L. K.; Mundal I.; Dahl L.; ŠaltytėBenth J.; Rokstad A. M. M. Limited benefit of marine protein hydrolysate on physical function and strength in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Marine Drugs. 2021, 19 (2), 62. 10.3390/md19020062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Mjøs I.; Thorsen E.; Hausken T.; Lied E.; Nilsen R. M.; Brønstad I.; Edvardsen E.; Frisk B. The effect of low dose marine protein hydrolysates on short-term recovery after high intensity performance cycling: a double-blinded crossover study. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2019, 16, 48. 10.1186/s12970-019-0318-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Lees M. J.; Nolan D.; Amigo-Benavent M.; Raleigh C. J.; Khatib N.; Harnedy-Rothwell P.; FitzGerald R. J.; Egan B.; Carson B. P. A fish-derived protein hydrolysate induces postprandial aminoacidaemia and skeletal muscle anabolism in an in vitro cell model using ex vivo human serum. Nutrients. 2021, 13 (2), 647. 10.3390/nu13020647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zhu X.; Wang J.; Lu Y.; Zhao Y.; Zhang N.; Wu W.; Zhang Y.; Fu Y. Potential of Food Protein-Derived Bioactive Peptides against Sarcopenia: A Comprehensive Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 5419. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c09094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Agyei D.; Ongkudon C. M.; Wei C. Y.; Chan A. S.; Danquah M. K. Bioprocess challenges to the isolation and purification of bioactive peptides. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2016, 98, 244–56. 10.1016/j.fbp.2016.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  166. Pei J.; Gao X.; Pan D.; Hua Y.; He J.; Liu Z.; Dang Y. Advances in the stability challenges of bioactive peptides and improvement strategies. Current Research in Food Science 2022, 5, 2162. 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Sathivel S.; Smiley S.; Prinyawiwatkul W.; Bechtel P. J. Functional and nutritional properties of red salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) enzymatic hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science. 2005, 70, c401. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11437.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  168. Klompong V.; Benjakul S.; Yachai M.; Visessanguan W.; Shahidi F.; Hayes K. Amino acid composition and antioxidative peptides from protein hydrolysates of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis). Journal of food science. 2009, 74, C126. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Zhang J.-B.; Zhao Y.-Q.; Wang Y.-M.; Chi C.-F.; Wang B. Eight collagen peptides from hydrolysate fraction of Spanish mackerel skins: Isolation, identification, and in vitro antioxidant activity evaluation. Marine Drugs. 2019, 17 (4), 224. 10.3390/md17040224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zhang Y.; He S.; Bonneil É; Simpson B. K. Generation of antioxidative peptides from Atlantic sea cucumber using alcalase versus trypsin: In vitro activity, de novo sequencing, and in silico docking for in vivo function prediction. Food chemistry. 2020, 306, 125581. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Sampath Kumar N.; Nazeer R.; Jaiganesh R. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from the skin protein hydrolysate of two marine fishes, horse mackerel (Magalaspis cordyla) and croaker (Otolithes ruber). Amino acids. 2012, 42, 1641–9. 10.1007/s00726-011-0858-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Hsu K.-C. Purification of antioxidative peptides prepared from enzymatic hydrolysates of tuna dark muscle by-product. Food Chem. 2010, 122 (1), 42–8. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Kim H.-S.; Lee W.; Lee J.-H.; Sanjeewa K. A.; Fernando I. S.; Ko S.-C.; Lee S.-H.; Kim Y.-T.; Jeon Y.-J. Purification and identification of an antioxidative peptide from digestive enzyme hydrolysis of cutlassfish muscle. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 2018, 27 (8), 934–44. 10.1080/10498850.2018.1508532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  174. Bordbar S.; Ebrahimpour A.; Zarei M.; Abdul Hamid A.; Saari N. Alcalase-generated proteolysates of stone fish (Actinopyga lecanora) flesh as a new source of antioxidant peptides. International Journal of Food Properties. 2018, 21 (1), 1541–59. 10.1080/10942912.2018.1497060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Sukkhown P.; Pirak T.; Jangchud K.; Prinyawiwatkul W. Novel peptides from dried squid head by-products obtained from snack process. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2021, 56 (11), 5506–17. 10.1111/ijfs.15085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  176. Ngo D.-H.; Ryu B.; Vo T.-S.; Himaya S.; Wijesekara I.; Kim S.-K. Free radical scavenging and angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) skin gelatin. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2011, 49 (5), 1110–6. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES