Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1978 Aug;31(8):730–734. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.8.730

Detection of rubella haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) and virus-specific IgM antibody using trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes in the HAI test.

W Al-Nakib, H Lilley
PMCID: PMC1145397  PMID: 690236

Abstract

The modification of the standard rubella haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) test using trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes instead of chick erythrocytes was evaluated. In a comparative study we found that, of 816 samples tested by both methods, the titres of 807 (98.9%) sera were in close agreement within an acceptable twofold difference. Trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes usually provided titres that were twofold higher than those obtained with chick erythrocytes. In general, a very good correlation between the two methods was obtained. Data are presented that emphasise the importance of trypsin treatment of human group O erythrocytes before use in the HAI method. Furthermore, we found that trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes can be stored for periods of up to 30 days and used in the HAI test without any appreciable loss of sensitivity or specificity. Moreover, we replaced chick erythrocytes with trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes in the sucrose density gradient/HAI method used for the detection of rubella virus-specific IgM and found it to be a very satisfactory method. In view of these findings we recommend that trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes should replace chick erythrocytes in the standard rubella HAI test since the former provided not only a more sensitive, more economic, and less time-consuming method but also a technique which is as specific as that using chick erythrocytes.

Full text

PDF
730

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banatvala J. E., Druce A., Best J., Al-Nakib W. Specific IgM responses after rubella vaccination; potential application following inadvertent vaccination during pregnancy. Br Med J. 1977 Nov 12;2(6097):1263–1264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6097.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Best J. M., Banatvala J. E., Watson D. Serum IgM and IgG responses in postnatally acquired rubella. Lancet. 1969 Jul 12;2(7611):65–68. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92386-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper L. Z., Matters B., Rosenblum J. K., Krugman S. Experience with a modified rubella hemagglutination inhibition antibody test. JAMA. 1969 Jan 6;207(1):89–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iwakata S., Morrissey L. P., Rhodes A. J., Labzoffsky N. A. The use of trypsin-treated human group O erythrocytes in rubella hemagglutination-inhibition test. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1974;45(4):352–361. doi: 10.1007/BF01242878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Quirin E. P., Nelson D. B., Inhorn S. L. Use of trypsin-modified human erythrocytes in rubella hemagglutination-inhibition testing. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):353–357. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.353-357.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vesikari T., Vaheri A. Rubella: a method for rapid diagnosis of a recent infection by demonstration of the IgM antibodies. Br Med J. 1968 Jan 27;1(5586):221–223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5586.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. al-Nakib W., Best J. M., Banatvala J. E. Letter: Rubella-specific IgM and a new inhibitor. Br Med J. 1974 Aug 31;3(5930):579–579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5930.579-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES