Abstract
A suspension of Staphylococcus aureus deposited on the skin was much more effectively removed by soap-and-water washing when it had been spread and allowed to dry (mean survival 2%) than when it had been rubbed on to the skin (mean survival 29.9%); when antiseptics (70% ethyl alcohol, Hibiscrub without added water) were used, there was no difference between their action against bacteria dried on and bacteria rubbed on to the skin; both of these methods, and especially alcohol, were more effective than soap and water. When a detergent-disinfectant method (washing with Hibiscrub and water) was used, there was a significantly greater effect against rubbed-on than against dried-on bacteria; soap and water was slightly more effective than Hibiscrub and water against the latter. The need to reappraise methods of reducing transient skin flora in 'hygienic' hand cleansing and the tests used for this purpose are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ayliffe G. A., Babb J. R., Quoraishi A. H. A test for 'hygienic' hand disinfection. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Oct;31(10):923–928. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.10.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayliffe G. A., Bridges K., Lilly H. A., Lowbury E. J., Varney J., Wilkins M. D. Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin. J Hyg (Lond) 1975 Oct;75(2):259–274. doi: 10.1017/s002217240004729x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayliffe G. A., Lowbury E. J. Sources of gas gangrene in hospital. Br Med J. 1969 May 10;2(5653):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5653.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWBURY E. J., LILLY H. A., BULL J. P. DISINFECTION OF HANDS: REMOVAL OF TRANSIENT ORGANISMS. Br Med J. 1964 Jul 25;2(5403):230–233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5403.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWBURY E. J., LILLY H. A., BULL J. P. Disinfection of the skin of operation sites. Br Med J. 1960 Oct 8;2(5205):1039–1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5205.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWBURY E. J., LILLY H. A. Disinfection of the hands of surgeons and nurses. Br Med J. 1960 May 14;1(5184):1445–1450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5184.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowbury E. J., Lilly H. A., Ayliffe G. A. Preoperative disinfection of surgeons' hands: use of alcoholic solutions and effects of gloves on skin flora. Br Med J. 1974 Nov 16;4(5941):369–372. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5941.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowbury E. J., Lilly H. A. Use of 4 per cent chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection. Br Med J. 1973 Mar 3;1(5852):510–515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5852.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rotter M., Mittermayer H., Kundi Michael Untersuchungen zum Modell der künstlich kontaminierten Hand; Vorschlag für eine Prüfmethode. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1974 Dec;159(5-6):560–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STORY P. Testing of skin disinfectants. Br Med J. 1952 Nov 22;2(4794):1128–1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4794.1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]