Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1979 Feb;32(2):168–170. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.2.168

A comparison of thiomersal and 50% alcohol as preservatives in urinary cytology.

M E Beyer-Boon, P W Arentz, R S Kirk
PMCID: PMC1145604  PMID: 374426

Abstract

The efficacy of 50% ethyl alcohol and of thiomersal as preservatives in urinary cytology were compared. In both methods over 80% of the cells were sufficiently well preserved after three days to allow cytomorphological evaluation, and over 50% on the seventh day. In the specimens without preservative, only 54% and 28% were intact after the same time intervals. In contrast with 50% ethyl alchohol, thiomersal is a more effective bactericide, it does not increase the volume of the sample, it is cheaper, and it does not affect the cytomorphology.

Full text

PDF
168

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARDEN G. P. Experiences with a merthiolate bone bank. Med Illus. 1956 Aug;10(8):522–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harris M. J. Sputum fixatives. Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):493–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mitchell P. D. Sputum fixatives. Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):493–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tucker B. Sputum fixatives. Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):492–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES