Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1980 Jan;33(1):58–60. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.1.58

Significance of bacterial and white cell counts in midstream urines.

P J Little, B A Peddie, A R Sincock
PMCID: PMC1145982  PMID: 6987277

Abstract

The results of cultures carried out on urine collected by a midstream technique (MSU) have been compared with the results of cultures of urine collected by suprapubic bladder aspiration (SPA) in the same 903 patients. Comparisons indicate that when there are more than 100 x 10(6)/l (100 000/ml) Gram-negative bacteria in the midstream urine this finding is confirmed by suprapubic aspiration in 92% of patients, and in 70% when the urine contained this number of Gram-positive bacteria. When the culture contained more than one species (mixed organisms), the presence of infection was confirmed in only 11%. When there were 10-100 x 10(6)/l bacteria in the MSU the finding of Gram-negative bacilli still indicated urinary infection in 74% of patients, but the presence of Gram-positive organisms was confirmed in only 30% and mixed organisms in 2%. In asymptomatic patients, the presence of white cells in the urine was not helpful in confirming the diagnosis of infection. The nature of the organism found in the MSU is almost as important as the number of bacteria in assessing the validity of the result.

Full text

PDF
58

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. KASS E. H. Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:56–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KASS E. H. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957 Nov;100(5):709–714. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110025004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KASS E. H. Chemotherapeutic and antibiotic drugs in the management of infections of the urinary tract. Am J Med. 1955 May;18(5):764–781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(55)90190-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KASS E. H. Pyelonephritis and bacteriuria. A major problem in preventive medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1962 Jan;56:46–53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-56-1-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LITTLE P. J. A COMPARISON OF THE URINARY WHITE CELL CONCENTRATION WITH THE WHITE CELL EXCRETION RATE. Br J Urol. 1964 Sep;36:360–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1964.tb09521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LITTLE P. J. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA OF PYELONEPHRITIS. J Clin Pathol. 1965 Jul;18:556–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LITTLE P. J. Urinary white-cell excretion. Lancet. 1962 Jun 2;1(7240):1149–1151. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(62)92195-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peddie B. A., Little P. J., Sincock A. R. Urinary tract infection in general practice. N Z Med J. 1978 Oct 25;88(622):317–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tapsall J. W., Taylor P. C., Bell S. M., Smith D. D. Relevance of "significant bacteriuria" to aetiology and diagnosis of urinary-tract infection. Lancet. 1975 Oct 4;2(7936):637–639. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES