ABSTRACT
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive leukemic malignancy that affects myeloid lineage progenitors. Relapsed or refractory AML patients continue to have poor prognoses, necessitating the development of novel therapy alternatives. Adoptive T-cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) is an intriguing possibility in the field of leukemia treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is now being tested in clinical trials (mostly in phase I and phase II) using AML targets including CD33, CD123, and CLL-1. Preliminary data showed promising results. However, due to the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of AML and the co-expression of some AML targets on hematopoietic stem cells, these clinical investigations have shown substantial “on-target off-tumor” toxicities, indicating that more research is required. In this review, the latest significant breakthroughs in AML CAR T cell therapy are presented. Furthermore, the limitations of CAR T-cell technology and future directions to overcome these challenges are discussed.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, CAR T-cells, adoptive T-cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor, leukemia, cancer therapy
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the fast-advancing destructive neoplasm of myeloid precursors that causes partial/complete differentiation block and results in bone marrow (BM) failure. 1 Acute myeloid leukemia is characterized by genomic mutations and chromosomal abnormalities within BM cells, interferes with natural cell processes, and leads to uncontrolled cell expansion and compromised differentiation. It represents approximately 23% of all leukemia cases. 2 Although AML is common in adults, the incidence estimates in the United States are 7.8 per million individuals aged 0-14 and 9.1 per million individuals aged 15-19 years. 3 In 2023, the American Cancer Society estimated 20,380 new cases of AML, with approximately 11,310 cases becoming deadly and an average age of diagnosis of ~68 years. 4
Acute myeloid leukemia results from 2 or more mutations, one of which promotes proliferation (class I mutations) while the other inhibits differentiation (class II mutations). 5 FLT3-ITD, KRAS, and KIT mutations are classified as class I, while mutations involving core binding factor (CBF) fusions and CEBPA are classified as class II. 5 Approximately half of individuals suffering from AML display a normal karyotype and mutations in certain genes, such as FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, and NPM1, while the remaining exhibit chromosomal abnormalities affecting chromosomes 5, 7, 9, 16, 8, 21, 15, or 17. 6
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a conventional treatment for AML. Meanwhile, targeted therapies using inhibitors of FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, BCL2, and others and antibody-based therapies that employ anti-CD33 and anti-CD3 have emerged as novel AML treatments. 7-11 However, treatment resistance and relapse are still major challenges, emphasizing the pressing demand for innovative therapeutic strategies. 12
An exciting immunotherapeutic strategy that has revolutionized the field of blood cancer treatment involves modifying autologous/allogenic T-cells using chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), enabling the specific targeting of leukemia-associated antigens. This review provides an overview of the various antigens used in CAR T-cell therapy for AML, presents current clinical findings, and discusses the limitations of CAR T-cell technology and future directions to overcome these challenges.
CAR T-cell therapy
Chimeric antigen receptors are recombinant antigenic determinants designed by uniting the attaching domain of immunoglobulins with that of a signal-transducing domain derived from T-cells. 13 By utilizing lentiviral/retroviral vectors, CARs can be genetically expressed on the surface of αβ CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. This modification directs T-cells toward a specific antigen, initiating a signaling cascade inside CAR-engineered T-cells, resulting in self-renewal and tumor-specific cytotoxic activity similar to that of stimulated T-cells. 14 Figure 1 shows a timeline of the major developments in CAR T-cell therapy.
Figure 1.
- The timeline of major developments in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. CML: chronic myeloid leukemia, CAR: chimeric antigen receptor, CRISPR: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, FDA: Food and Drug Administration, cTCR: chimeric T-cell receptor, SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus
In 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sanctioned tisagenlecleucel as the pioneer CAR T-cell treatment regime for treating pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). 15 This was followed by the approval of the following additional CD19-based CAR T-cell therapies for various B-cell leukemias such as: axicabtagene ciloleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. 16-18 In subsequent years, the FDA granted approval for 2 B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific CAR T-cell therapies for treating multiple myeloma (MM) such as: idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel. 19,20
CAR T-cell therapy in AML
In 2013, a noteworthy clinical trial marked a pivotal moment in CAR T-cell therapy for AML. This study involved the first reported use of second-generation anti-CD28-ζ CAR T-cells targeting Lewis Y in AML. Although leukemia progression was observed, this investigation established the tolerability profile of administering CAR T-cells to individuals with AML; however, on-target/off-tumor effects were reported. 21
A key step in the development of CAR T-cell therapy in AML involves selecting the appropriate surface antigen, which should have a robust expression on leukemic cells and negligible or low expression on normal cells to avoid on-target/off-tumor effects. Several cell surface antigens, including CD123, CLL-1, CD33, CD44v6, and FLT3, have been identified as possible targets. Table 1 lists the clinical trials for the treatment of AML employing various targets.
Table 1.
- Registered clinical trials using chimeric antigen receptor T-cell for acute myeloid leukemia in https://clinicaltrials.gov/ as of 8/3/2024.
| Trial identifiers | Study names | Condition(s) | Study type | Antigens | Phases | Enrollments † | Start dates | Completion dates | Responsible parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT04033302 | Multi-CAR T-cell therapy targeting CD7-positive malignancies | AML, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, NK cell lymphoma | Interventional | CD7 | I/II | 30 | 2019 | 2023 | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | Unknown |
| NCT04762485 | Humanized CD7 CAR T-cell therapy for r/r CD7+ acute leukemia | AML, T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, mixed phenotype acute leukemia | Interventional | CD7 | I/II | 20 | 2021 | 2024 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Unknown |
| NCT05377827 | Dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of anti-CD7 allogeneic CAR T-cells (WU-CART-007) in patients with CD7+ hematologic malignancies | AML, T-Cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, others | Interventional | CD7 | I | 54 | 2023 | 2026 | Washington University School of Medicine | Recruiting |
| NCT05995028 | Universal 4SCAR7U targeting CD7-positive malignancies | AML, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, NK cell lymphoma | Interventional | CD7 | I | 30 | 2023 | 2026 | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | Recruiting |
| NCT03896854 | CART-19 T-cell in CD19 positive relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) | AML | Interventional | CD19 | I/II | 15 | 2017 | 2025 | Shanghai Unicar-Therapy Bio-medicine Technology Co.,Ltd | Recruiting |
| NCT04796441 | Clinical study of universal CAR-γδT-cell injection in the treatment of patients with relapsed AML after transplantation | AML | Interventional | CD19 | NA | 20 | 2020 | 2022 | Hebei Senlang Biotechnology Inc., Ltd | Unknown |
| NCT04257175 | CAR-T CD19 for acute myelogenous leukemia with t 8:21 and CD19 expression | AML | Interventional | CD19 | II/III | 10 | 2020 | 2024 | Sheba Medical Center | Recruiting |
| NCT05513612 | Novel CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies | AML, B-NHL, others | Interventional | CD19 | I | 0 | 2020 | 2026 | Shanghai Pudong Hospital | Withdrawn |
| NCT05388305 | Universal CAR-γδT cell injection in the AML patients | AML | Interventional | CD19 | NA | 30 | 2022 | 2023 | Hebei Senlang Biotechnology Inc., Ltd | Recruiting |
| NCT01864902 | Treatment of relapsed or chemotherapy refractory CD33 positive acute myeloid leukemia by CART-33 (CART33) | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I/II | 10 | 2013 | 2017 | Chinese PLA General Hospital | Unknown |
| NCT02799680 | Allogeneic CART-33 for relapsed/refractory CD33+ AML | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | - | 12 | 2015 | 2018 | The Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences | Unknown |
| NCT03971799 | Study of anti-CD33 chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T-cells (CD33CART) in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD33 | I/II | 52 | 2020 | 2039 | Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research | Active, not recruiting |
| NCT05105152 | PLAT-08: a study of SC-DARIC33 CAR T-cells in pediatric and young adults with relapsed or refractory CD33+ AML | AML | Interventional | CD33 | I | 18 | 2021 | 2041 | Colleen Annesley, Seattle Children’s Hospital | Recruiting |
| NCT04835519 | Phase I/II study of enhanced CD33 CAR T-cells in subjects with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I/II | 25 | 2021 | 2024 | Beijing Boren Hospital | Recruiting |
| NCT05672147 | CD33-CAR T-cell therapy for the treatment of recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I | 27 | 2023 | 2026 | City of Hope Medical Center | Recruiting |
| NCT05445765 | Anti-CD33 CAR-T cells for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I | 10CD33 | 2022 | 2024 | iCell Gene Therapeutics | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05473221 | Evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD33 CAR-T in patients with R/R AML | AML | Interventional | CD33 | I | 20 | 2022 | 2025 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05945849 | CD33KO-HSPC infusion followed by CART-33 infusion(s) for refractory/relapsed AML | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I | 16 | 2024 | 2044 | University of Pennsylvania | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05984199 | Donor-derived anti-CD33 CAR T-cell therapy (VCAR33) in patients with relapsed or refractory AML after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant | R/R AML | Interventional | CD33 | I/II | 24 | 2023 | 2026 | Vor Biopharma | Recruiting |
| NCT04351022 | CD38-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | CD38 | I/II | 20 | 2017 | 2023 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Unknown |
| NCT05239689 | Clinical study of CD38 CAR-T cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies | AML | Interventional | CD38 | I | 36 | 2022 | 2024 | Zhejiang University | Recruiting |
| NCT05442580 | CART-38 in adult AML and MM patients | AML, MM | Interventional | CD38 | I | 36 | 2023 | 2041 | University of Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| NCT04662294 | CD 70 CAR T for patients with CD70 positive malignant hematologic diseases | AML, NHL, MM | Interventional | CD70 | I | 108 | 2021 | 2027 | Zhejiang University | Recruiting |
| NCT04692948 | TAA6 cell injection in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD276 | NA | 5 | 2019 | 2023 | PersonGen BioTherapeutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Unknown |
| NCT05731219 | UTAA06 injection in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | B7-H3 (CD276) | I | 18 | 2022 | 2025 | PersonGen BioTherapeutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Recruiting |
| NCT05722171 | Clinical study of UTAA06 injection in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | B7-H3 (CD276) | I | 10 | 2022 | 2024 | PersonGen BioTherapeutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Recruiting |
| NCT03585517 | Safety and efficacy evaluation of IM23 CAR-T cells (IM23CAR-T) | AML | Interventional | CD123 | I | 10 | 2018 | 2020 | Beijing Immunochina Medical Science & Technology Co., Ltd. | Completed |
| NCT02159495 | Genetically modified T-cell immunotherapy in treating patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and persistent/recurrent blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm | AML, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm | Interventional | CD123 | - | 31 | 2015 | 2024 | City of Hope Medical Center | Active, not recruiting |
| NCT03114670 | Donor-derived anti-CD123-CART cells for recurred AML after Allo-HSCT | Adult AML | Interventional | CD123 | - | 20 | 2017 | 2021 | Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences | Unknown |
| NCT03190278 | Study evaluating safety and efficacy of UCART123 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AMELI-01) | R/R AML | Interventional | CD123 | - | 65 | 2017 | 2024 | Cellectis S.A. | Recruiting |
| NCT03556982 | CART-123 for relapsed/refractory scute myelocytic leukemia (AML) | R/R AML | Interventional | CD123 | I/II | 10 | 2018 | 2020 | The Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences | Unknown |
| NCT04265963 | CD123-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD123 | I/II | 45 | 2019 | 2024 | Chongqing Precision Biotech Co., Ltd | Recruiting |
| NCT04272125 | Safety and efficacy of CD123-targeted CAR-T therapy for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD123 | I/II | 40 | 2019 | 2024 | Chongqing Precision Biotech Co., Ltd | Recruiting |
| NCT05949125 | Dose-escalating trial with Allo-RevCAR01-T cells in combination with CD123 target module (R-TM123) for participants with selected hematologic malignancies positive for CD123 | AML | Interventional | CD123 | I | 37 | 2024 | 2025 | AvenCell Europe GmbH | Recruiting |
| NCT04318678 | CD123-directed autologous T-cell therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (CATCHAML) | AML, MDS, B-ALL, T-ALL, BPDCN | Interventional | CD123 | I | 32 | 2020 | 2025 | St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital | Active, not Recruiting |
| NCT04678336 | CD123 redirected T-cells for AML in pediatric subjects | R/R AML, pediatric AML | Interventional | CD123 | I | 12 | 2021 | 2036 | University of Pennsylvania | Active, not Recruiting |
| NCT04884984 | Anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL1 positive relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) | AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I/II | 20 | 2017 | 2024 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Recruiting |
| NCT05467202 | Evaluate the safety and efficacy of CLL1 CAR-T in patients with R/R AML | AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I | 20 | 2022 | 2025 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT04219163 | Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells for the treatment of AML expressing CLL-1 antigen | AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I/II | 18 | 2020 | 2038 | Baylor College of Medicine | Recruiting |
| NCT04923919 | Clinical study of chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the treatment of myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I | 100 | 2021 | 2024 | 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People’s Liberation Army of China | Recruiting |
| NCT05252572 | Clinical study of CLL1 CAR-T cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies | AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I | 36 | 2022 | 2024 | Zhejiang University | Recruiting |
| NCT06128044 | CRISPR-edited allogeneic anti-CLL-1 CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AMpLify) | R/R AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I | 70 | 2023 | 2028 | Caribou Biosciences, Inc. | Recruiting |
| NCT06118788 | Phase I clinical study: BG1805 injection in the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | CLL1 | I | 24 | 2023 | 2025 | Guangzhou Bio-gene Technology Co., Ltd | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05023707 | Anti-FLT3 CAR T-cell therapy in FLT3 positive relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | R/R AML | Interventional | FLT3 | I/II | 5 | 2021 | 2025 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Recruiting |
| NCT05432401 | TAA05 injection in the treatment of adult patients with FLT3-positive relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | FLT3-positive R/R AML | Interventional | FLT3 | I | 18 | 2022 | 2025 | PersonGen BioTherapeutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Recruiting |
| NCT05445011 | Anti-FLT3 CAR-T cell (TAA05 cell injection) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | FLT3 | I | 12 | 2022 | 2027 | Wuhan Union Hospital, China | Recruiting |
| NCT03018405 | A dose escalation Phase I study to assess the safety and clinical activity of multiple cancer indications (THINK) | MDS/AML/MM | Interventional | NKG2D | -/II | 146 | 2016 | 2021 | Celyad Oncology SA | Unknown |
| NCT04658004 | NKG2D CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | NKG2D | I | 36 | 2021 | 2027 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT04599543 | IL3 CAR-T cell therapy for patients with CD123 positive relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | IL3 | I | 36 | 2020 | 2026 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05266950 | Safety and efficacy study of CI-135 CAR-T cells in subjects with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CI-135 | I | 7 | 2021 | 2025 | Beijing Boren Hospital | Recruiting |
| NCT04803929 | Clinical study of anti-ILT3 CAR-T therapy for R/R AML (M4/M5) | R/R AML (M4/M5) | Interventional | ILT3 | I | 25 | 2021 | 2026 | Carbiogene Therapeutics Co. Ltd. | Recruiting |
| NCT05463640 | Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ADGRE2 CAR-T in patients with R/R AML | AML | Interventional | ADGRE2 | I | 20 | 2022 | 2025 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT05488132 | Administration of anti-siglec-6 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (rr/AML) | R/R AML | Interventional | Siglec-6 | I/II | 20 | 2022 | 2025 | Xuzhou Medical University | Recruiting |
| NCT06197672 | Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell redirected to target CD4 positive relapsed refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant | R/R AML | Interventional | CD4 | I | 30 | 2024 | 2042 | Indiana University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT06281847 | An adaptive open-label multicentre Phase 1/2 trial, to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose of CCTx-001, and to assess safety, tolerability, and clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (RESOLVE AML001) | R/R AML | Interventional | IL-1RAP | I/II | 143 | 2024 | 2041 | Advesya SAS | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT06017258 | A study of CD371-YSNVZIL-18 CAR T-cells in people with acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD371 | I | 6 | 2023 | 2026 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | Recruiting |
| NCT05016063 | Dual CD33-CLL1-CAR-T cells in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD33/CLL1 | I | 32 | 2021 | 2023 | Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing | Unknown |
| NCT05248685 | Optimized dual CD33/CLL1 CAR T-cells in subjects with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | CD33/CLL1 | I | 20 | 2022 | 2024 | Beijing Boren Hospital | Unknown |
| NCT03795779 | CLL1-CD33 cCAR in patients with relapsed or refractory, high risk hematologic malignancies | AML, MDS, MPN, CML | Interventional | CLL1/CD33 | I | 20 | 2018 | 2022 | iCell Gene Therapeutics | Unknown |
| NCT05467254 | Evaluate the safety and efficacy of CLL1+CD33 CAR-T in patients with R/R AML | AML | Interventional | CLL1/CD33 | I | 20 | 2022 | 2025 | Zhejiang University | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT06110208 | Study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of CLL1 and CD38 dual CAR-T in r/r AML | R/R AML | Interventional | CLL1/CD38 | I | 18 | 2023 | 2026 | 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People’s Liberation Army of China | Recruiting |
| NCT04010877 | Multiple CAR-T cell therapy targeting AML | AML | Interventional | CLL1, CD33, CD123 | I/II | 10 | 2019 | 2023 | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | Unknown |
| NCT03222674 | Multi-CAR T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia | AML | Interventional | Muc1/CLL1/CD33/CD38/CD56/CD123 | I/II | 10 | 2017 | 2020 | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | Unknown |
| NCT03291444 | CAR-T cells combined with peptide specific dendritic cell in relapsed/refractory leukemia/MDS | AML | Interventional | CD33, CD38, CD56, CD117, CD123, CD34, Muc1 | I | 30 | 2017 | 2025 | Zhujiang Hospital | Recruiting |
| NCT05995041 | Universal CAR-T cells targeting AML | R/R AML | Interventional | CLL-1, CD33, CD38, CD123 | I | 30 | 2023 | 2026 | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | Recruiting |
| NCT04766840 | Donor-derived CAR-T cells in the treatment of AML patients | AML | Interventional | not shown | I | 9 | 2021 | 2023 | Beijing Immunochina Medical Science & Technology Co., Ltd. | Unknown |
| NCT03473457 | CAR-T cells therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) | R/R AML | Interventional | Not shown | NA | 2 | 2018 | 2020 | Zhujiang Hospital | Terminated * |
| NCT04097301 | Study of CAR T-cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma | R/R AML, MM | Interventional | CD44v6 | I/II | 8 | 2019 | 2021 | AGC Biologics S.p.A | Terminated ∆ |
The ‘estimated’ enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
The therapeutic effect was not as expected.
Inability to close the study in a clinically relevant time frame.
CAR: chimeric antigen receptor, AML: acute myeloid leukemia, NK: natural killer, B-NHL: B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, R/R: relapsed/refractory, NA: not applicable MM: multiple myeloma
CD33 is a ubiquitous membrane-spanning member of the sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (SIGLEC) group. While it is frequently present in tissue-resident macrophages, normal progenitors, and approximately 90% of blast cells, it is rarely detected on embryonic CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). 22,23
CD33 remains one of the most researched drug candidates for AML management. Experiments using second-generation anti-CD33 CAR T-cells in NOD SCID gamma (NSG) mouse models with AML have demonstrated a notable decrease in AML burden and an increase in animal survival. 24 Additionally, preclinical outcomes revealed that anti-CD33 CAR T-cells reduced AML blasts and sustained mouse endurance in xenogeneic animal models while causing cytopenia and a decrease in myeloid progenitors. 25 Furthermore, a third-generation CAR T-cell directed at CD33 (3G.CAR33-T) demonstrated enhanced viability, secretion of cytokines, and robust cytolytic action when exposed to normal and leukemic CD33+ cells in comparison to second-generation anti-CAR33 CAR T-cells. 26
A phase 1/1b study (NCT03927261) investigating PRGN-3006 UltraCAR T-cells, featuring a CD33-specific CAR construct, membrane-bound IL-15 (mbIL15), and a kill switch in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD33+ AML is ongoing. In a preclinical investigation, 6 different anti-CD33 CAR T-cells incorporating CD3ζ peptide and CD28 or 4-1BB costimulatory domains exhibited notable anticancer action. 27 Encouraged by these promising outcomes, a phase I clinical trial (NCT03971799) is currently ongoing to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lentivirally transduced autologous and allogenic anti-CD33 CAR T-cells for individuals with R/R AML and post-HSCT R/R AML. 27 In an early phase I trial (NCT01864902) for R/R AML, a patient administered approximately 109 autologous T-cells (of which 38% were transduced) exhibited cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and pancytopenia. Despite a noticeable decrease in observed myeloid blast cells 2 weeks after treatment, there was subsequent blast cell rebound, resulting in relapse 9 weeks post-therapy. 28 A safety evaluation with varying dosages of autologous CD33-CAR T-cells (NCT03126864) showed adverse events, including CRS and neurotoxicity. 29
IL-3 receptor subunit (IL-3Rα, CD123) levels are elevated not only in leukemia stem cells (LSCs) and AML blasts but also in early HSPCs, resulting in the risk of long-lasting or even permanent myeloablation. 30 CD123 stimulates cell propagation when exposed to IL-3 and has high expression in AML cells, with a negligible expression on CD34+ BM cells, rendering it a suitable candidate for CAR T-cell therapy in AML. 31,32
In preclinical studies, anti-CD123 CAR T-cell therapy effectively eliminated AML blast cells while demonstrating acceptable levels of toxicity to HSPCs. 33,34 Furthermore, 4-1BB- and CD28-specific CD123-CAR T-cells proved capable of targeting AML cells while profoundly ablating normal hematopoietic regeneration. 35
In an initial phase I trial (NCT02623582), autologous T-cells with anti-CD123 linked to TCR/4-1BB regions were evaluated in 5 patients with R/R AML. The patients underwent lymphodepletion therapy and then received CD123 CAR T-cells. However, due to adverse events, including CRS, a lack of anti-leukemic efficiency, and reported on-target/off-tumor toxicity, the trial was terminated. 36 Another ongoing investigation into allogeneic CD123 CAR T-cells was halted due to patient death 9 days after infusion. The trial resumed with conditions including a reduction in the dose of CART123 and chemotherapy, as well as not exceeding the age of 65 years. 37
To enhance safety, novel anti-CD123 CAR T-cell therapy, which exploits the rapidly adjustable universal CAR T-cell platform (UniCAR) to improve tolerability while retaining full anti-AML effectiveness, was developed. A dose-escalating clinical study (NCT04230265) is currently underway to investigate the therapeutic advantage of the novel UniCAR system. 38 Moreover, demethylating agent-based drugs have shown promise in enhancing immunological reactions and assisting cancer cell eradication by anti-CD123 CAR T-cells. 39
Initial findings from the first cohort of an ongoing first-in-human (FIH) investigation using lentiviral-infected CD123-specific CD28-CAR T-cells demonstrated that one of 2 patients who underwent treatment with a dose of 50 million CAR+ T-cells achieved an AML-free status phenotypically for a duration of 2 months (NCT02159495). Shortly after, the individual underwent a second HSCT therapy, which resulted in a blast cell decrease from 77.9% to 0.9%. 40 Furthermore, among the 4 subjects tested, one individual achieved complete remission (CR) with a higher dose of 200 million CAR T-cells, another with CR prior to the start of the therapy continued to have CR, and the remaining 2 subjects experienced a decrease in the number of AML blasts with no relapse. Notably, all toxicities were reversible and tolerable, with no known dose-limiting toxicities or concomitant cytopenia. 41
The natural killer (NK) group 2D (NKG2D) receptor in AML exhibits selective expression on monoblasts, while myeloblasts and chemoresistant LSCs either lack or show weak expression, which enables them to evade immune defense and prevent NK-mediated apoptosis. 42 Hence, utilizing CAR constructs to activate NKG2D ligands represents a valuable strategy for immunotherapy in AML. 43 As such, a bispecific FLT3-CAR therapy incorporating scFv and NKG2D-CAR T-cells has been developed, demonstrating effective eradication of AML blasts in preclinical studies. 44
CYAD-01 are recombinant autologous T-cells expressing a CAR engineered by linking the NKG2D target with the CD3ζ signaling component. 45 A preliminary phase I FIH study (NCT02203825) revealed encouraging activity of CYAD-01 in subjects with AML. 46 Another trial (NCT03018405) is being carried out to assess the safety and tolerability of large doses and repeated injections of NKG2D-CAR T-cells. 45,47 Although it showed antileukemic activity, patients experienced adverse events and CRS associated with the 3 dose levels, warranting further investigations into safety and efficiency. 45
CLL-1 is highly expressed in approximately 92% of AML blasts and granulocytes, while it is expressed in approximately 2.5% of HSCs, making it a suitable target for CAR T-cell therapy. 48,49 Anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy in a child with secondary AML resulted in favorable outcomes, including molecular CR for more than 10 months. 50 A phase I/II anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy trial involving 4 children with R/R AML resulted in 3 cases of CR with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. 51 In a phase 1 anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy trial involving adult R/R AML, most patients experienced CRS, although it was tolerable when patients were followed up for 6 months. 52 Treatment with dual-targeting CD33- and CLL-1-specific CAR T-cell therapy in a phase I trial involving a child with complex karyotype AML achieved CR. 53 As CLL-1 is highly expressed in granulocytes, it is recommended that anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy be bridged with HSCT to avoid granulocytopenia.
FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD aberration is present in ~20% of all AML cases and FLT3-TKD aberration is present in 7% of all AML cases, with only a subset of HSPCs expressing FLT3. 54 Nevertheless, tailored CAR technologies are not aimed at mutant FLT3 but rather at FLT3 as a whole. 55,56 Second-generation FLT3-specific CAR with a 4-1BB costimulatory domain displayed noteworthy cytolytic effects on FLT3+ AML as well as on primary cell lines, with negligible off-tumor damage to healthy HSCs. 57 Some studies have reported blood cell-related toxicity in animal models. 56
CD44v6, splicing variant 6 of the hyaluronic acid receptor (CD44, a class I transmembrane glycoprotein), is elevated in AML but not in HSCs and has insignificant expression in normal cells. 58,59 A second-lineage CAR redirected toward CD44v6 was developed and showed cytotoxic activity against AML blasts but not HSCs. 60 Clinical trials of CD44v6-based CAR T-cell therapy for the management of AML patients (NCT04097301) are currently underway. 61
CD7 expression is reported in approximately 30% of AML cases and its absence in HSCs makes it a good candidate for CAR T-cell therapy. 62,63 Utilizing CD7-specific CAR T-cell therapy in CD7 knockout T-lymphocytes has been proven to target CD7+ AML cells with no toxic effects on myeloid and erythroid cells. 64
CD38 is highly expressed in AML samples and hematopoietic progenitors but is absent in long-term HSCs. 65,66 Preclinical studies using CD38-CAR T-cells have shown antileukemic activities in AML cell lines and primary AML associated with improved survival while targeting normal hematopoietic progenitors. 67
Limitations of CAR T-cell therapy
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy faces a formidable challenge when tumor cells downregulate the target CAR antigen. This results in a partial or complete loss of antigen expression and contributes to disease relapse following CAR T-cell therapy. 68 This has been observed in ALL and MM patients in which CD19 and BCMA expression, were downregulated or lost after treatment with CAR T-cells. 69,70 This phenomenon of antigen escape has also been reported in solid tumors. The expression of IL13Ra2 was downregulated in recurring glioblastoma cases after CAR T-cell therapy. 71 To overcome this issue, increase the efficiency of CAR T-cell therapy, and reduce tumor recurrence/relapse rates, strategies involving targeting multiple antigens using dual CAR constructs or tandem CARs have been developed. Data from clinical trials using CD19/CD22 and CD19/BCMA dual-targeted CAR T-cells for ALL and MM, have shown promising results and prolonged remission rates. However, increased on-target off-leukemia toxicity has been associated with dual-target CAR constructs versus single constructs. 72,73 In AML, compound constructs have been developed to enhance anti-AML activity. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell dual-target CD123/NKG2DLs and CAR T-cell dual-target CD33/TIM3 have been shown to be efficacious against AML cell lines and primary AML. 74,75 Although the dual-target strategy has proven to be effective against antigen escape, further improvements are needed to overcome other hurdles, such as on-target off-tumor effects.
Targeting AML antigens is challenging due to their frequent expression in normal hematopoietic cells, necessitating careful antigen selection in CAR design to achieve high therapeutic efficiency and avoid on-target off-tumor toxicity. 76 As this is a common issue between hematological and solid tumors, an emerging strategy to address this challenge involves directing CARs toward tumor-associated posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as overexpressed truncated O-glycans in solid tumors. 77 A total of 4 primary PTMs directed toward CAR T-cell glycated antigens have been explored. 76
Optimizing the affinity of scFvs can help mitigate the on-target off-tumor effect of antigens that are highly expressed in tumor cells but have low expression in normal cells. CD38-CAR T-cells engineered to have a low affinity have been shown to eliminate CD38+ MM cells, while CD38+ hematopoietic cells remain unaffected. 78 This strategy may be effective in designing CAR T-cells for AML due to the abundance of common antigens and the variable expression between AML and normal blood cells.
The toxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy represents an obstacle to achieving the maximum benefit of CAR T-cell therapy as a standard of care therapy. Such toxicities include CRS, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). 79 Severe and life-threatening events have been reported, even for FDA-approved CD19-targeted CARs. 80,81 In CAR T-cell treatment for ALL, nearly all patients experience some toxicity, with 23-46% developing CRS and extensive T-cell proliferation in vivo. 82,83 CRS and ICANS become more severe following the infusion of a high number of CAR T-cells and upon the secretion of the cytokines IL-1 and IL-6. 84 Further research is required to identify new strategies to overcome the toxicity associated with CAR T-cells.
The magnitude and dynamics of CAR T-cell stimulation are intricately affected by multiple factors, including the extent of cancer antigen expression, the affinity of the antigen-binding domain to its target epitope, and the integration of costimulatory components within the CAR. 85 Thus, optimizing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing toxicity require careful consideration of multiple components within the CAR’s modular structure.
Making modifications to the hinge and transmembrane domains of CARs is one strategy to reduce toxicity. 86 In a phase 1 trial involving patients with B-cell lymphoma, CD19-targeted CAR T-cells with genetic alterations resulting in a longer CD8a hinge and intracellular domain sequences led to lower cytokine production, reduced CAR T-cell propagation, absence of grade 1 CRS or neurotoxicity in all patients, and CR in 54.5% of patients when compared to shorter CD8a hinge and intracellular domain sequences. 87 Additionally, the host’s immune response to CAR constructs may pose a challenge. Thus, using human-derived fragments instead of murine-derived fragments is an optimal solution to avoid immunological-related toxicity. 88
Another recent approach to preventing CAR T-cell cytokine toxicity involves the inhibition of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production either by modifying CAR-transduced T-cells or by combined treatment. Preclinical studies indicate that mutational inactivation of GM-CSF by generating GM-CSF-deficient CD19-CAR T-cells through the CRISPR/Cas9 disruption of GM-CSF or the inhibition of GM-CSF with lenzilumab decreases neurotoxicity and CRS while enhancing CAR T-cell efficacy. 89
Employing “off-switches” or suicidal genes is another strategy to reduce CAR T-cell toxicity. These approaches enable the selective reduction of customized CAR T-cells during adverse reactions by treating them with an additional stimulating agent. 90 Various approaches have been developed, including inducible Cas9 switches with immediate effects on eliminating CAR T-cells in approximately 30 minutes, protease-based small molecule-assisted shutoff CARs (SMASh-CARs), and the administration of dasatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) immediately after CAR T-cell injection to reversibly inhibit CAR T-cell activation, thereby protecting model animals from CRS-induced mortality. 91-93 Such strategies would be highly beneficial if they are engineered to be temporally controlled to allow for the inhibition and activation of CAR T-cells when needed.
Conclusion and future directions
Despite advancements in understanding AML etiology and pathophysiology, disease relapse continues to be the primary cause of mortality, even following HSCT. Chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapeutic intervention is a promising approach with the potential for long-term protection in individuals with AML relapse. However, the success of CAR T-cell therapy in AML depends on various factors. Overcoming immune escape and identifying AML-specific target antigens remain critical hurdles in successfully instigating adoptive CAR T-cell therapies in the future. Other ongoing considerations include optimizing CAR signaling, managing CAR T-cell persistence post-treatment to avert extended myeloablation, host conditioning complications, and mitigating T-cell-mediated toxic reactions. With numerous clinical trials in progress, assessing the ongoing safety of CAR T-cell therapy and its ability to target relapse-inducing LSCs will be intriguing. There is optimism that therapeutic alternatives will continue to advance, offering improved efficacy with reduced toxicity for better patient outcomes.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia, for supporting the work. The author also would like to thank Scribendi Inc for the English language editing.
Footnotes
References
- 1. Saultz JN, Garzon R. Acute myeloid leukemia: a concise review. J Clin Med 2016; 5: 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dong Y, Shi O, Zeng Q, Lu X, Wang W, Li Y, et al. Leukemia incidence trends at the global, regional, and national level between 1990-2017. Exp Hematol Oncol 2020; 9: 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73: 17-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. American Cancer Society. Key statistics for acute myeloid leukemia. [Updated 2023; accessed 2023 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/acute-myeloid-leukemia/about/key-statistics.html
- 5. Juliusson G, Lehmann S, Lazarevic V. Epidemiology and Etiology of AML. [Updated 2021; 2024 Apr 9]. Available from: 10.1007/978-3-030-72676-8 [DOI]
- 6. Mundt KA, Dell LD, Boffetta P, Beckett EM, Lynch HN, Desai VJ, et al. The importance of evaluating specific myeloid malignancies in epidemiological studies of environmental carcinogens. BMC Cancer 2021; 21: 227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Short NJ, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, Daver N. Emerging treatment paradigms with FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol 2019; 10: 2040620719827310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dhillon S. Ivosidenib: first global approval. Drugs 2018; 78: 1509-1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kim ES. Enasidenib: first global approval. Drugs 2017; 77: 1705-1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Deeks ED. Venetoclax: first global approval. Drugs 2016; 76: 979-987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gasiorowski RE, Clark GJ, Bradstock K, Hart DN. Antibody therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2014; 164: 481-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kavanagh S, Murphy T, Law A, Yehudai D, Ho JM, Chan S, et al. Emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukemia: translating biology into the clinic. JCI Insight 2017; 2: e95679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Rivière I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov 2013; 3: 388-398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jackson HJ, Rafiq S, Brentjens RJ. Driving CAR T-cells forward. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016; 13: 370-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 439-448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 31-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1331-1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, Lunning MA, Wang M, Arnason J, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet 2020; 396: 839-852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 705-716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, Agha M, Cohen AD, Hari P, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 2-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 1265-1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ritchie DS, Neeson PJ, Khot A, Peinert S, Tai T, Tainton K, et al. Persistence and efficacy of second generation CAR T-cell against the LeY antigen in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Ther 2013; 21: 2122-2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Griffin JD, Linch D, Sabbath K, Larcom P, Schlossman SF. A monoclonal antibody reactive with normal and leukemic human myeloid progenitor cells. Leuk Res 1984; 8: 521-534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hauswirth AW, Florian S, Printz D, Sotlar K, Krauth MT, Fritsch G, et al. Expression of the target receptor CD33 in CD34+/CD38-/CD123+ AML stem cells. Eur J Clin Invest 2007; 37: 73-82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. O’Hear C, Heiber JF, Schubert I, Fey G, Geiger TL. Anti-CD33 chimeric antigen receptor targeting of acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2015; 100: 336-344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kenderian SS, Ruella M, Shestova O, Klichinsky M, Aikawa V, Morrissette JJ, et al. CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T-cells exhibit potent preclinical activity against human acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2015; 29: 1637-1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Liu Y, Wang S, Schubert ML, Lauk A, Yao H, Blank MF, et al. CD33-directed immunotherapy with third-generation chimeric antigen receptor T-cells and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in intact and CD33-edited acute myeloid leukemia and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Int J Cancer 2022; 150: 1141-1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Qin H, Yang L, Chukinas JA, Shah N, Tarun S, Pouzolles M, et al. Systematic preclinical evaluation of CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia defines optimized construct design. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9: e003149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang QS, Wang Y, Lv HY, Han QW, Fan H, Guo B, et al. Treatment of CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells in one patient with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Ther 2015; 23: 184-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tambaro FP, Singh H, Jones E, Rytting M, Mahadeo KM, Thompson P, et al. Autologous CD33-CAR-T cells for treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia 2021; 35: 3282-3286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Haubner S, Perna F, Köhnke T, Schmidt C, Berman S, Augsberger C, et al. Coexpression profile of leukemic stem cell markers for combinatorial targeted therapy in AML. Leukemia 2019; 33: 64-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jordan CT, Upchurch D, Szilvassy SJ, Guzman ML, Howard DS, Pettigrew AL, et al. The interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain is a unique marker for human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1777-1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Testa U, Pelosi E, Castelli G. CD123 as a therapeutic target in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Arcangeli S, Rotiroti MC, Bardelli M, Simonelli L, Magnani CF, Biondi A, et al. Balance of anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor binding affinity and density for the targeting of acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Ther 2017; 25: 1933-1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sugita M, Galetto R, Zong H, Ewing-Crystal N, Trujillo-Alonso V, Mencia-Trinchant N, et al. Allogeneic TCRαβ deficient CAR T-cells targeting CD123 in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Baroni ML, Sanchez Martinez D, Gutierrez Aguera F, Roca Ho H, Castella M, Zanetti SR, et al. 41BB-based and CD28-based CD123-redirected T-cells ablate human normal hematopoiesis in vivo. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8: e000845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tasian SK. Acute myeloid leukemia chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy: how far up the road have we traveled? Ther Adv Hematol 2018; 9: 135-148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cummins KD, Gill S. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: how close to reality? Haematologica 2019; 104: 1302-1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Loff S, Dietrich J, Meyer JE, Riewaldt J, Spehr J, von Bonin M, et al. Rapidly switchable universal CAR-T cells for treatment of CD123-positive leukemia. Mol Ther Oncolytics 2020; 17: 408-420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. El Khawanky N, Hughes A, Yu W, Myburgh R, Matschulla T, Taromi S, et al. Demethylating therapy increases anti-CD123 CAR T-cell cytotoxicity against acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 6436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Budde L, Song JY, Kim Y, Blanchard S, Wagner J, Stein AS, et al. Remissions of acute myeloid leukemia and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm following treatment with CD123-specific CAR T-cells: a first-in-human clinical trial. Blood 2017; 130: 811. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Budde LE, Song J, Del Real M, Kim Y, Toribio C, Wood B, et al. Abstract PR14: CD123CAR displays clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN): safety and efficacy results from a phase 1 study. Cancer Immunol Res 2020; 8: PR14-PR14. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chen Y, Wang J, Zhang F, Liu P. A perspective of immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia: current advances and challenges. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1151032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Murad JM, Baumeister SH, Werner L, Daley H, Trébéden-Negre H, Reder J, et al. Manufacturing development and clinical production of NKG2D chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T-cells for autologous adoptive cell therapy. Cytotherapy 2018; 20: 952-963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li KX, Wu HY, Pan WY, Guo MQ, Qiu DZ, He YJ, et al. A novel approach for relapsed/refractory FLT3mut+ acute myeloid leukaemia: synergistic effect of the combination of bispecific FLT3scFv/NKG2D-CAR T-cells and gilteritinib. Mol Cancer 2022; 21: 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sallman DA, Kerre T, Havelange V, Poiré X, Lewalle P, Wang ES, et al. CYAD-01, an autologous NKG2D-based CAR T-cell therapy, in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes or multiple myeloma (THINK): haematological cohorts of the dose escalation segment of a phase 1 trial. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10: e191-e202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Baumeister SH, Murad J, Werner L, Daley H, Trebeden-Negre H, Gicobi JK, et al. Phase I trial of autologous CAR T-cells targeting NKG2D ligands in patients with AML/MDS and multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunol Res 2019; 7: 100-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lonez C, Verma B, Hendlisz A, Aftimos P, Awada A, Van Den Neste E, et al. Study protocol for THINK: a multinational open-label phase I study to assess the safety and clinical activity of multiple administrations of NKR-2 in patients with different metastatic tumour types. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e017075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ma H, Padmanabhan IS, Parmar S, Gong Y. Targeting CLL-1 for acute myeloid leukemia therapy. J Hematol Oncol 2019; 12: 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wang J, Chen S, Xiao W, Li W, Wang L, Yang S, et al. CAR-T cells targeting CLL-1 as an approach to treat acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhang H, Gan WT, Hao WG, Wang PF, Li ZY, Chang LJ. Successful anti-CLL1 CAR T-cell therapy in secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zhang H, Wang P, Li Z, He Y, Gan W, Jiang H. Anti-CLL1 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27: 3549-3555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Jin X, Zhang M, Sun R, Lyu H, Xiao X, Zhang X, et al. First-in-human phase I study of CLL-1 CAR-T cells in adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15: 88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Liu F, Cao Y, Pinz K, Ma Y, Wada M, Chen K, et al. First-in-human CLL1-CD33 compound CAR T-cell therapy induces complete remission in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia: update on phase 1 clinical trial. Blood 2018; 132: 901. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Levis M, Small D. FLT3: it does matter in leukemia. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1738-1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Jetani H, Garcia-Cadenas I, Nerreter T, Thomas S, Rydzek J, Meijide JB, et al. CAR T-cells targeting FLT3 have potent activity against FLT3-ITD+ AML and act synergistically with the FLT3-inhibitor crenolanib. Leukemia 2018; 32: 1168-1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sommer C, Cheng HY, Nguyen D, Dettling D, Yeung YA, Sutton J, et al. Allogeneic FLT3 CAR T-cells with an off-switch exhibit potent activity against AML and can be depleted to expedite bone marrow recovery. Mol Ther 2020; 28: 2237-2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wang Y, Xu Y, Li S, Liu J, Xing Y, Xing H, et al. Targeting FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia using ligand-based chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T-cells. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11: 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Neu S, Geiselhart A, Sproll M, Hahn D, Kuçi S, Niethammer D, et al. Expression of CD44 isoforms by highly enriched CD34-positive cells in cord blood, bone marrow and leukaphereses. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 593-598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bendall LJ, Bradstock KF, Gottlieb DJ. Expression of CD44 variant exons in acute myeloid leukemia is more common and more complex than that observed in normal blood, bone marrow or CD34+ cells. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1239-1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Casucci M, Nicolis di Robilant B, Falcone L, Camisa B, Norelli M, Genovese P, et al. CD44v6-targeted T-cells mediate potent antitumor effects against acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Blood 2013; 122: 3461-3472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stornaiuolo A, Valentinis B, Sirini C, Scavullo C, Asperti C, Zhou D, et al. Characterization and functional analysis of CD44v6.CAR T-cells endowed with a new low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor-based spacer. Hum Gene Ther 2021; 32: 744-760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Chang H, Salma F, Yi QL, Patterson B, Brien B, Minden MD. Prognostic relevance of immunophenotyping in 379 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 2004; 28: 43-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kim MY, Cooper ML, Jacobs MT, Ritchey JK, Hollaway J, Fehniger TA, et al. CD7-deleted hematopoietic stem cells can restore immunity after CAR T-cell therapy. JCI Insight 2021; 6: e149819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gomes-Silva D, Atilla E, Atilla PA, Mo F, Tashiro H, Srinivasan M, et al. CD7 CAR T-cells for the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Ther 2019; 27: 272-280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhong X, Ma H. Targeting CD38 for acute leukemia. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 1007783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. McKenzie JL, Gan OI, Doedens M, Dick JE. Reversible cell surface expression of CD38 on CD34-positive human hematopoietic repopulating cells. Exp Hematol 2007; 35: 1429-1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. An N, Pan Y, Yang L, Zhang Q, Deng S, Zhang Q, et al. Anti-acute myeloid leukemia activity of CD38-CAR-T cells with PI3Kd downregulation. Mol Pharm 2023; 20: 2426-2435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Tumor antigen escape from CAR T-cell therapy. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 1219-1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Xu X, Sun Q, Liang X, Chen Z, Zhang X, Zhou X, et al. Mechanisms of relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its prevention and treatment strategies. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Lancaster E, et al. B-cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T-cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest 2019; 129: 2210-2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Brown CE, Alizadeh D, Starr R, Weng L, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, et al. Regression of glioblastoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2561-2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Cordoba S, Onuoha S, Thomas S, Pignataro DS, Hough R, Ghorashian S, et al. CAR T-cells with dual targeting of CD19 and CD22 in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1797-1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Larson RC, Kann MC, Graham C, Mount CW, Castano AP, Lee WH, et al. Anti-TACI single and dual-targeting CAR T-cells overcome BCMA antigen loss in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 7509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Jin X, Xie D, Sun R, Lu W, Xiao X, Yu Y, et al. CAR-T cells dual-target CD123 and NKG2DLs to eradicate AML cells and selectively target immunosuppressive cells. Oncoimmunology 2023; 12: 2248826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang Y, Lu W, Rohrbacher L, Flaswinkel H, Emhardt AJ, Magno G, et al. CD33-TIM3 dual CAR T-cells: enhancing specificity while maintaining efficacy against AML. Blood 2023; 142: 3449. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Sterner RC, Sterner RM. CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11: 69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Steentoft C, Migliorini D, King TR, Mandel U, June CH, Posey AD Jr.. Glycan-directed CAR-T cells. Glycobiology 2018; 28: 656-669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Drent E, Themeli M, Poels R, de Jong-Korlaar R, Yuan H, de Bruijn J, et al. A rational strategy for reducing on-target off-tumor effects of CD38-chimeric antigen receptors by affinity optimization. Mol Ther 2017; 25: 1946-1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Morris EC, Neelapu SS, Giavridis T, Sadelain M. Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2022; 22: 85-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. O’Leary MC, Lu X, Huang Y, Lin X, Mahmood I, Przepiorka D, et al. FDA approval summary: tisagenlecleucel for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25: 1142-1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sharma P, Kasamon YL, Lin X, Xu Z, Theoret MR, Purohit-Sheth T. FDA approval summary: axicabtagene ciloleucel for second-line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29: 4331-4337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Santomasso BD, Park JH, Salloum D, Riviere I, Flynn J, Mead E, et al. Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 958-971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Frey NV, Porter DL. Cytokine release syndrome with novel therapeutics for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2016; 2016: 567-572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Vanhooren J, Dobbelaere R, Derpoorter C, Deneweth L, Van Camp L, Uyttebroeck A, et al. CAR-T in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: barriers and how to overcome them. Hemasphere 2023; 7: e937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Milone MC, Bhoj VG. The pharmacology of T-cell therapies. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2018; 8: 210-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Alabanza L, Pegues M, Geldres C, Shi V, Wiltzius JJW, Sievers SA, et al. Function of novel anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors with human variable regions is affected by hinge and transmembrane domains. Mol Ther 2017; 25: 2452-2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Ying Z, Huang XF, Xiang X, Liu Y, Kang X, Song Y, et al. A safe and potent anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Nat Med 2019; 25: 947-953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sommermeyer D, Hill T, Shamah SM, Salter AI, Chen Y, Mohler KM, et al. Fully human CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors for T-cell therapy. Leukemia 2017; 31: 2191-2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Sterner RM, Sakemura R, Cox MJ, Yang N, Khadka RH, Forsman CL, et al. GM-CSF inhibition reduces cytokine release syndrome and neuroinflammation but enhances CAR-T cell function in xenografts. Blood 2019; 133: 697-709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Minagawa K, Al-Obaidi M, Di Stasi A. Generation of suicide gene-modified chimeric antigen receptor-redirected T-cells for cancer immunotherapy. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 1895: 57-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Di Stasi A, Tey SK, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, Martinez C, et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1673-1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Juillerat A, Tkach D, Busser BW, Temburni S, Valton J, Duclert A, et al. Modulation of chimeric antigen receptor surface expression by a small molecule switch. BMC Biotechnol 2019; 19: 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Mestermann K, Giavridis T, Weber J, Rydzek J, Frenz S, Nerreter T, et al. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib acts as a pharmacologic on/off switch for CAR T-cells. Sci Transl Med 2019; 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

