Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 27:2024.09.25.614811. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.09.25.614811

Trem2 deficiency attenuates breast cancer tumor growth in lean, but not obese or weight loss, mice and is associated with alterations of clonal T cell populations

Elysa W Pierro 1, Matthew A Cottam 2, Hanbing An 3, Brian D Lehmann 4,5, Jennifer A Pietenpol 5,6, Kathryn E Wellen 7, Liza Makowski 8, Jeffrey C Rathmell 1,5,9,10, Barbara Fingleton 5,11,*, Alyssa H Hasty 1,5,10,12,13,*
PMCID: PMC11463595  PMID: 39386686

Abstract

Obesity is an established risk factor for breast cancer development and worsened prognosis; however, the mechanisms for this association – and the potential benefits of weight loss – have not been fully explored. The adipose environment surrounding breast tumors, which is inflamed in obesity, has been implicated in tumor progression. An emerging therapeutic target for cancer is TREM2, a transmembrane receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is expressed on macrophages in adipose tissue and tumors. We utilized genetic loss of function (Trem2+,+ and Trem2−/−) models and dietary (lean, obese, and weight loss) intervention approaches to examine impacts on postmenopausal breast cancer. Remarkably, Trem2 deficiency ameliorated tumor growth in lean, but not obese or weight loss mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing, in conjunction with VDJ sequencing of tumor and tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum-adj) immune cells, revealed that tumors of lean Trem2−/− mice exhibited a shift in clonal CD8+ T cells from an exhausted to an effector memory state, accompanied with increased clonality of CD4+ Th1 cells, that was not observed in any other diet-genotype group. Notably, identical T cell clonotypes were identified in the tumor and mATTum-adj of the same mouse. Finally, an immune checkpoint study demonstrated that αPD-1 therapy restricted tumor growth in lean and weight loss, but not obese mice. We conclude that weight history is relevant when considering potential efficacy of TREM2 inhibition in postmenopausal breast cancer. This work reveals immunological interactions between tumors and surrounding adipose tissue, highlighting significant differences under obese and weight loss conditions.

Keywords: Trem2, breast cancer, obesity, weight loss, adipose tissue, T cells, macrophages, tumor microenvironment

Introduction

Obesity is a steadily growing epidemic worldwide1 and is associated with increased risk for 13 cancer types, including postmenopausal breast cancer2. In the United States, 30.5% of the population were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) in 2000, which increased to 42.4% in 2018, while severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) rose from 4.7% to 9.2% over the same time period1. In addition to an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, epidemiological data also indicate obesity is associated with advanced stage at the time of diagnosis3, higher incidence of metastasis4, and worse clinical outcomes for obese breast cancer patients regardless of menopausal status57. The mechanisms linking obesity with increased risk, worsened prognosis, and increased recurrence of breast cancer are not fully understood; however, some key players that have been investigated include increased estrogen, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, increased secretion of adipokines, and heightened inflammation8.

Obesity-associated inflammation includes recruitment of macrophages as well as CD8+ T cells into abdominal white adipose tissue depots9,10. A novel subset of macrophages termed “lipid associated macrophages” (LAMs), with high expression of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), have been described predominantly in the visceral adipose tissue of obese mice11 and humans12. TREM2-expressing LAMs were identified in omental adipose tissue samples from obese individuals, with their proportion strongly correlating with BMI12. TREM2 is a transmembrane receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily that binds a plethora of ligands including bacterial products, DNA, lipoproteins, and phospholipids13. As a result of recent discoveries placing TREM2 in a central role of immune signaling, it has emerged as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease, obesity-related metabolic disease, and cancer14.

TREM2 is commonly expressed on tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). For example, carcinomas from various primary sites including skin, liver, lung, breast, bladder, and colon contain TREM2+ macrophages15. Preclinical models suggest TREM2 expression contributes to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment16. Studies encompassing subcutaneous models of sarcoma and colorectal cancer as well as orthotopic breast and ovarian cancer models have shown tumor growth attenuation in TREM2-deficient mice and in tumor-bearing mice treated with anti-TREM2 antibody15,17,18. However, no work has been done in the postmenopausal breast cancer setting or in the context of obesity and weight loss.

Interestingly, deficiency of TREM2 or treatment with anti-TREM2 antibody augments the efficacy of αPD-1 immune checkpoint therapy15,18. The recent discovery of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has brought to light the immunogenic potential of TNBC in recent years19. Pembrolizumab, an αPD-1 therapeutic, and Atezolizumab, an αPD-L1 therapeutic, have been approved by the FDA for treatment of TNBC within defined parameters20,21. Work from Makowski’s group demonstrated that αPD-L1 impairs tumor progression in a pre-menopausal breast cancer model in mice that have lost weight through bariatric surgery, but not in obese mice22. However, the response of postmenopausal breast cancer to αPD-1 in the settings of obesity or weight loss remains uncertain.

The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study reported that postmenopausal women with weight loss had a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer compared to postmenopausal women with stable weight23. Interestingly, women with sustained weight loss have lower risk of breast cancer compared to women with patterns of weight loss and weight regain24. However, whether therapies that modulate immune-tumor cell interactions have altered efficacy in patients who have lost weight is not known. Given the recent data showing that increased inflammatory tone remains unresolved in adipose tissue of mice and humans that have lost weight2529, as well as the dramatic increase in use of potent weight loss drugs, the examination of obesity and weight loss in cancer outcomes is of timely relevance for discovery research.

By implanting lean, obese, and weight loss Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mice with murine mammary cancer cells, we discovered that lean, but not obese or weight loss Trem2−/− mice were resistant to tumor growth. Accordingly, analysis by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) revealed that tumors from lean Trem2−/− mice exhibited an increase of highly clonal CD8+ and CD4+ Th1 cells. Detailed analysis of clonotypes by VDJ sequencing revealed that identical clonotypes were present in both the tumor and tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum-adj) of the same mice. Finally, an immune checkpoint inhibitor study demonstrated that αPD-1 restricted tumor growth in the lean and weight loss animals; however, the obese animals were unresponsive to the therapy. We conclude that efficacy of TREM2 modulation and αPD-1 treatment varies under different weight history conditions. Furthermore, weight history in combination with TREM2 modulation impacts the presence and expansion of clonal CD8+ T effector memory (CD8+ TEM) and CD4+ Th1 cells, including matched clones between the tumor and mATTum-adj.

Methods

Wild-type mouse studies

Female C57BL/6J mice (JAX; cat. #000664) were used for all wild-type studies. Mice were ovariectomized by Jackson Laboratories at 6 weeks of age and sent to Vanderbilt University. At 8-9 weeks of age, mice were placed on high fat diet (HFD; Research Diets; cat. #D12492) or low fat diet (LFD; Research Diets; cat. #D12450B) to generate lean, obese, and weight loss mice. Lean mice were maintained on the LFD for the entirety of the study. Obese mice were fed LFD for 12 weeks, then switched to HFD for the remaining 11-12 weeks. Contrastingly, the weight loss group was fed HFD for 12 weeks then switched to LFD for the remaining 11-12 weeks. Mice were maintained on 12-hour light-dark cycles. The mouse housing facilities were maintained at 20-25°C and 30-70% humidity. All animal studies were performed only after approval from Vanderbilt’s Animal Care and Use Committee.

Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− studies

Wild-type C57BL/6J (JAX; cat. #000664; RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664) and Trem2 knockout C57BL/6J (JAX; cat. #027197; RRID: IMSR_JAX:027197) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories, and colonies were maintained and bred at Vanderbilt University. Mice were first interbred to generate Trem2 heterozygous mice. Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− littermate mice resulting from the heterozygous breedings were used in the chow-fed breast cancer study. Subsequently, the Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mice resulting from heterozygous breedings were bred independently to generate the quantity of mice necessary for the Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− diet breast cancer studies. At 6 weeks of age, mice were ovariectomized by the Vanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center (VMMPC). At 8 weeks of age, mice were placed on either HFD or LFD to generate lean, obese, and weight loss groups as described above.

Tumor cell implantation

After 20 weeks on diet, mice underwent orthotopic injection of E0771 cells (3 × 105 cells resuspended in PBS (Gibco; cat. #10010-023)) into the fourth left mammary fat pad. Tumors grew for 3-4 weeks as indicated for each study in the Results and Figure Legends. Once palpable, tumors were measured every 1-2 days using electronic calipers to determine tumor volume (V=(L*W*W)/2). The first diet study conducted in wild-type mice were injected with E0771 cells (ATCC; cat. #CRL-3461). All other mice analyzed in this study were injected with E0771 cells that ectopically expressed GFP and PD-L1 (E0771PD-L1). The latter cells were generated through a process in which the coding region of murine cd274 was synthesized, codon optimized (Geneart, ThermoFisher) and subcloned into lentiviral vector (pCDH). E0771 cells were infected with the pCDH-PD-L1 expression vector and grown in puromycin to select for cells that stably expressed PD-L1. Mice were sacrificed at day 28 or earlier if volume reached 2000 mm3 or ulceration occurred.

Body composition and glucose tolerance test

Body composition was determined using nuclear magnetic resonance (Bruker Minispec) in the VMMPC. Mice were fasted for 5 h, fasted blood glucose was recorded, and mice were injected intraperitoneally with a glucose bolus (2.0 g dextrose per kg fat free mass)11. Blood glucose was measured via tail bleed at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min post-glucose injection with a handheld glucometer (Bayer Contour Next EZ Meter). Glucose tolerance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and integrated area under the curve calculated by the trapezoidal rule.

Magnetic sorting

Magnetic sorting of the adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction was performed using the Miltenyi OctoMACS Separator with MS columns (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-042-201). Magnetic sorting of tumors was performed using the Miltenyi QuadroMACS Separator with LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-042-401). CD11b (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-093-634) and CD4/CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-116-480) and CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-116-478) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, whole adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction or single cell suspension of the tumor was stained with microbeads for 15 min at 4°C. Stained sample was run through the magnetic column with subsequent washes. The positive and negative fractions were collected, and the cell pellets were lysed in buffer RLT (Qiagen; cat. #79216) with 1% β-mercaptoethanol and stored at −80°C until used for RNA isolation.

IgG and αPD-1 administration

Once the average tumor volume of a cohort reached 50-100 mm3, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with 200 μg/mouse with αPD-1 mAb (clone 29F.1A12; BioXCell; cat. #BE0273; RRID: AB_2687796) or IgG2A isotype control (clone 2A3; BioXCell; cat. #BE0089; RRID: AB_1107769) was initiated. Mice were injected every 2 d for a total of 8 d (total of 4 injections).

sTREM2 quantification

The protocol for sTREM2 detection in the plasma of mice was adapted from Zhong et al30. Briefly, blood was collected at the time of sacrifice via cardiac puncture and centrifuged to yield plasma. A 96-well ELISA plate was coated overnight with TREM2 capture antibody (R&D Systems; cat. #MAB17291; RRID: AB_2208679). The plate was washed 3 times, blocked with 1% BSA for 4 h, and washed another 3 times. Recombinant mouse TREM2 protein (R&D Systems; cat. #1729-T2) was reconstituted according to the manufacturer specifications and diluted to a range of 0-10 ng/mL for the standard curve. Diluted plasma samples and the standard curve were incubated overnight. Biotinylated TREM2 antibody (R&D systems; cat. #BAF1729; RRID: AB_356109) in conjunction with streptavidin HRP (R&D Systems; cat. # DY998) were used to detect sTREM2 at 450 nm on a plate reader.

Adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction isolation

Mice were sacrificed with isoflurane overdose followed by cervical dislocation and perfusion with 50 mL PBS via the left ventricle. Perigonadal ovarian adipose tissue (oAT) and subcutaneous mATTum-adj and contralateral mammary adipose tissue (mATContra) were dissected, minced with scissors, and digested in 6 mL of 2 mg/mL type IV collagenase (Worthington Biochemical; cat. #LS004189) in PBS with 1% FBS (Gibco; cat. #16140-071) for 30 (oAT) or 45 min (mAT) at 37°C. Samples were vortexed, passed through a 100 μm filter, and centrifuged. Floating adipocytes and supernatant were removed, red blood cells were lysed using ACK Buffer (KD Medical; cat. #RGF-3015), and samples were passed through a 35 μm filter to obtain the stromal vascular fraction as described previously31.

Single cell dissociation of tumor

Tumors were excised from the animal, minced with scissors, and run for one round on the GentleMACS Dissociator Tumor.01 setting in 5 mL 10% FBS 1% P/S RPMI (Gibco; cat. #2240-0089) (cRPMI) in C tubes (Miltenyi Biotec; cat. #130-093-237). Processed samples were incubated in 5 mL cRPMI with 435 U/mL DNase I (Sigma Aldrich; cat. # D5025) and 218 U/mL Collagenase I (Sigma-Aldrich; cat. #C2674) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Digested tumors were vortexed, passed through a 70 μm filter, lysed using ACK buffer (KD medical; cat. #RGF-3015), and passed through a 35 μm filter.

Single cell RNA sequencing

The CD45+ fraction of the mATTum-adj and the tumor were isolated for scRNAseq. For the mATTum-adj, the stromal vascular fraction of the mATTum-adj was isolated as described above and stained with DAPI and CD45 (clone 30-F11; Biolegend; cat. #103137). The live CD45+ cells were isolated by gating on the DAPI CD45+ fraction on the 4-laser FACSAria III, Bioprotect IV Baker Hood Enclosure. Cells were counted on the Countess III and diluted to 1200 cells/μl. For the tumor, tumors were dissociated to a single cell suspension as described above and counted with the Countess III. Subsequently, 3×107 cells were stained with CD45 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec; catalogue #130-110-618) and passed first through a LS column on the quadroMACS followed by a second sort of the resulting positive fraction through an MS column on the octoMACS. The CD45+ fraction was stained with DAPI and sorted for live cells on the 4-laser FACSAria III, Bioprotect IV Baker Hood Enclosure. Samples were counted with the Countess III and diluted to 1200 cells/μl. The Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5’ HT v2 kit from 10X Genomics was implemented for both the mATTum-adj and tumor samples and run on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 at the VUMC VANTAGE core facility.

Single cell RNAseq data processing

Reads from newly generated single cell RNAseq data were processed using Cellranger v.7.2.0 (10X Genomics). For initial quality control of droplets, dropkick v1.2.732 was first performed. Then, dropkick score, mitochondrial RNA content, total number of UMI counts, and feature counts informed thresholding for each individual sample. All cells with > 10% mitochondrial content were filtered. Doublet detection was performed using scDblFinder33 and cells identified as doublets were filtered prior to downstream analysis. Count matrices were then loaded into Scanpy v1.9.134 and independent samples were concatenated into one anndata object for tumor specimens and one for adipose specimens. Counts were normalized and log1p transformed. Feature selection for downstream dimensional reduction was performed using the scanpy.pp.highly_variable_genes function with “n_top_genes=5000, flavor=’seurat_v3’”, and a batch_key corresponding to the sample collection batch. For single cell immune receptor sequencing, contig annotations from CellRanger v.7.2.0 were filtered for productive TCRs and imported into anndata objects as metadata.

Dimensional reduction and data integration

Linear dimensional reduction was performed using principal component analysis with the scanpy.tl.pca function with “svd_solver=‘arpack’, n_comps=50” based on highly variable genes detected by the scanpy.pp.highly_variable_genes function. 50 principal components were used for data integration. Concatenated data was integrated with Harmony35. For Harmony, the SCANPY implementation was called with the scanpy.pp.harmony_integrate function using the sample collection batch and time (morning or afternoon) as categorical covariates. Linear dimensional reduction was performed using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) with the scanpy.tl.umap function using “spread=1, min_dist=0.5”.

Unsupervised clustering and cell annotation

For the tumor specimens, unsupervised clustering was performed using the Leiden algorithm implemented in the scanpy.tl.leiden function with “resolution=l”. The scanpy.tl.rank_genes_groups function was used to detect cluster-specific enriched genes. A consensus between cluster-specific gene markers and established celltype-specific markers were used to broadly annotate cells. Then, further subclustering of specific populations with various resolution settings was performed to identify higher resolution subclusters. For tumor myeloid cells, the pan-cancer myeloid atlas36 was referenced for subpopulation markers where possible. For tumor T cells, ProjectTILs v.3.037 was used with the mouse TIL atlas to predict and annotate subpopulations. For adipose tissue specimens, reference mapping to our previously published murine adipose tissue atlas10 was performed using scvi-tools v.1.1.238.

For downstream analyses requiring Seurat objects, scDIOR39 was used for object conversion and analyses were performed in R v4.2.2 using Seurat v5.140.

Differential expression analysis

Differential expression was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test in Seurat v5.1 with the FindMarkers function using the fast implementation by Presto41. Significance was determined by a log fold-change threshold > 0.25 and an adjusted p value of < 0.05.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and RT-PCR

Tissues or cells were homogenized and lysed in buffer RLT (Qiagen; cat. #79216) with 1% β-mercaptoethanol. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen; cat. #74004) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad; cat, #1708840). Gene expression was determined using Taqman gene expression assays with FAM-MGB-conjugated primers. All primers were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific: Trem2 (cat. #Mm04209422_m1), Plin2 (cat. #Mm00475794_m1), Cd36 (cat. #Mm00432403_m1), Cd9 (cat. #Mm00514275_g1), Nos2 (cat. #Mm00440485_m1), Arg1 (cat. #Mm00475988_m1), Itgam (cat. #Mm00434455_m1), Pdcd1 (cat. #Mm01285676_m1), Tox (cat. # Mm00455231_m1), Tigit (cat. #Mm03807522_m1), and Lag3 (cat. #Mm00493071_m1). Experiments were run on the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) as follows: an initial 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 rounds of 95°C for 10 sec and 55°C for 45 sec with detection at the end of each round. All gene expression was normalized to Gapdh and calculated with the -ΔΔCT method.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with Prism 10 (GraphPad Software). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Student’s t test was used to compare two groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare more than two groups when only one variable was present. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare more than two group when more 2 variables were present. Specific post-hoc tests utilized are indicated within each figure legend. Pearson correlation was used to assess simple linear regression analysis.

Data availability

Both the raw and processed scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing data in this study have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and will be made available prior to publication. The GEO Accession Number is GSE278003.

Results

Models of lean, obese, and weight loss postmenopausal breast cancer

To develop obese and weight loss models of postmenopausal breast cancer, the C57BL/6J mouse strain was selected due to its propensity towards developing obesity and established use in the field of metabolic research (Fig. 1A). At six weeks of age, mice were ovariectomized and recovered on chow diet for two weeks. Subsequently, lean mice were maintained on LFD for the entirety of the study (23-24 weeks), obese mice were fed LFD for 12 weeks then switched to HFD for the remainder of the study (11-12 weeks), and weight loss mice were fed HFD for 12 weeks followed by LFD for the remaining 11-12 weeks (Fig. 1A). Food intake was recorded weekly for all groups (Supp. Fig. 1A & B). Obesity and weight loss were evident by body and oAT mass (Fig. 1B & C), and success of the ovariectomy surgery was determined by uterine atrophy at the end point of the study (Fig. 1D). Glucose tolerance tests were performed after 11 weeks (before the diet switch for the weight loss mice) and 19 weeks on diet. After 11 weeks on HFD, the weight loss group had established obesity and thus exhibited worsened glucose tolerance compared to the mice on LFD (Supp. Fig. 1C). At the 19-week time point, the obese group exhibited worsened glucose tolerance, and the weight loss mice glucose clearance matched the lean controls (Fig. 1E). After 20 weeks on diet, the mice were injected with E0771 cells in the fourth left mammary fat pad and tumors were monitored for 3 weeks. Obese mice exhibited a significant increase in tumor progression measured as volume over time and endpoint tumor mass, while the weight loss mice showed no significant difference from the lean group (Fig. 1F - H).

Figure 1. Weight loss rescues tumor growth in postmenopausal breast cancer model.

Figure 1.

A) Schematic of mouse model of postmenopausal breast cancer in obesity and weight loss including timing of ovariectomy, 10% low fat diet (LFD) and 60% high fat diet (HFD) feeding, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (ipGTT) and orthotopic tumor injections. B) Body weight (g) measured weekly with dashed lines to indicate time of diet switch and E0771 cell injection. For diet groups, green = lean, blue = obese, pink = weight loss. C) Ovarian adipose tissue (oAT) mass at endpoint. D) Uterine atrophy expressed as percent of normal uterine mass. E) Blood glucose (mg/dL) measured over time during 19-week time point ipGTT and corresponding integrated area under the curve (iAUC). F) Tumor volume measured over time. G) End point tumor mass. H) Images of tumors from lean, obese, and weight loss mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare groups for oAT mass, uterine mass, iAUC from ipGTT, and tumor mass. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis of blood glucose over time in ipGTT and mixed-effects model was used for tumor volume analysis. All data plotted as mean ± SEM for 12 mice per group. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Figure 1A was created with Biorender.com.

Lipid associate macrophage markers were upregulated and positively correlated with tumor mass in tumor-adjacent, but not contralateral, mammary adipose tissue

TREM2 expressing LAMs are associated with obesity12 and their immunosuppressive nature has been reported15,17. Therefore, expression of LAM genes was quantified in tumors of the lean, obese and weight loss mice. CD11b+ cells were magnetically sorted from tumors (Fig. 2A; Supp. Fig. 2A). Expression of LAM genes in the tumor-derived CD11b+ cells was not different among dietary groups (Fig. 2B). Next, LAM genes were quantified in mATTum-adj and mATContra (Fig. 2C). Only Trem2 expression was increased in the obese mATContra compared to the lean mATcontra. However, Trem2 and Plin2 were increased in obese mATTum-adj compared to both the lean mATTum-adj and weight loss mATTum-adj. Cd36 was increased in obese mATTum-adj compared to the lean mATTum-adj. Furthermore, within the obese and weight loss groups, Trem2, Plin2 and Cd36 were upregulated in the mATTum-adj relative to the mATContra (Fig. 2 D - F). To determine whether there is a relationship between tumor growth and LAM gene expression, Pearson correlation analyses between mAT LAM genes and tumor size were performed. There was no correlation between Trem2, Plin2, or Cd36 expression and tumor mass in the mATContra (Fig. 2G & H; Supp. Fig. 2B); however, Trem2 and Plin2 gene expression positively correlated with tumor mass in the mATTum-adj (Fig. 2G & H; Supp. Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. Lipid associated macrophage marker genes are increased in obese tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum-adj) and positively correlate with tumor mass.

Figure 2.

A) Schematic for magnetically sorting CD11b+ cells from E0771 tumors using Miltenyi Octomacs. B) Trem2, Cd36, and Cd9 relative gene expression by RT-PCR in tumor CD11b+ fraction. C) Anatomical schematic of subcutaneous mATTum-adj and contralateral mammary adipose tissue (mATContra). D - F) Trem2, Plin2, Cd36 relative gene expression by RT-PCR from whole tissue lysates of mATContra and mAT Tum-adj. G-H) Correlation analysis of tumor mass vs. Trem2 and Plin2 gene expression in mATContra and mAT Tum-adj with linear regression fit. Figures D-F, solid bar = mATContra, hashed bar = mAT Tum_adj. One-way ANOVA tests were used to compare tumor LAM marker gene expression among groups. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to compare groups for all mAT gene expression. Simple linear regression analysis was applied to correlation plots and the p value and coefficient of determination (r2) is displayed on each graph. All data plotted as mean ± SEM for 8-12 mice per group. *denotes diet effect, †denotes tissue effect (mATContra vs. mAT Tum-adj), **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001; †p<0.05, †††p<0 001, ††††p<00001. Figures 2A & C were created with Biorender.com.

Trem2 deficiency decreased tumor growth in postmenopausal breast cancer model

Other groups have demonstrated TREM2 deficiency or treatment with anti-TREM2 monoclonal antibody results in decreased tumor growth in models of sarcoma, colorectal cancer, pre-menopausal breast cancer, and ovarian cancer15,17,18. To determine if TREM2 ablation attenuates tumor growth in the postmenopausal breast cancer model, Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− female C57BL/6J mice were ovariectomized and maintained on a chow diet (Fig. 3A). Plasma soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) was absent in the Trem2−/− animals (Fig. 3B). Throughout the duration of the study, no differences in body weight or glucose tolerance (ipGTT at 14-wks) were observed between genotypes (Fig. 3C; Supp. Fig. 3A), and oAT and mAT mass were not different at the study endpoint (Supp. Fig. 3B & C). Twenty-five weeks after ovariectomy, mice were injected with E0771PD-L1 cells, and tumors were monitored for 4 weeks. Both tumor progression and tumor mass at endpoint were significantly reduced in the Trem2−/− mice compared to Trem2+/+ controls (Fig. 3D & E; individual tumor growth curves - Supp. Fig. 3D & E). Cd36 gene expression was significantly reduced in oAT of Trem2−/− mice, with a slight reduction of Plin2 and Cd9 (Fig. 3F). Both M1-like and M2-like macrophage markers, Nos2 and Arg1, respectively, were decreased in the oAT (Fig. 3F). Previous reports in male epididymal adipose tissue indicated profound adipocyte hypertrophy in Trem2 deficient mice11,12. In this model, the Trem2−/− mATTum-adj exhibited a shift in size from small (25-49μm diameter) adipocytes toward large (70-99μm diameter) adipocytes (Fig. 3G - I), which is the first time this has been reported in female mAT.

Figure 3. Trem2 ablation attenuates tumor growth, decreases lipid associated macrophages, and increases adipocyte hypertrophy in a chow-fed postmenopausal breast cancer model.

Figure 3.

A) Schematic of study design for chow-fed postmenopausal breast cancer model in Trem2+/+ and Trem2+/+ mice. B) sTREM2 (ng/mL) in plasma from female Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mice measured by ELISA. C) Blood glucose (mg/dL) measured during 14-week time point intra-peritoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT) and corresponding integrated area under the curve (iAUC). D) Tumor volume (mm3) over time measured every 1-2 days. E) Tumor mass (g) at study endpoint. F) Relative gene expression by RT-PCR of LAM and macrophage markers from oAT whole tissue lysates. G) Adipocyte sizing frequency in tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum_adj). Diameter: small = 25-49μm, medium = 50-69μm, large = 70-99μm, very large = 100-150μm, extremely large = >150μm. H-I) Representative image of Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mATTum-adj stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar represents 100μm. Two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD test was used to compare blood glucose over time in the ipGTT. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used to compare tumor volumes over time between genotypes. Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to compare groups for sTREM2 ELISA, iAUC, tumor mass, LAM gene expression, and each binning diameter size in adipocyte sizing analysis. All data plotted as mean ± SEM for 10-13 mice per group. *denotes genotype effect (Trem2++/+ vs. Trem2−/−) *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Figure 4A was created with Biorender.com.

Trem2 ablation attenuated tumor growth in lean, but not obese or weight loss animals

To assess the impact of TREM2 ablation on tumor growth in the setting of obesity and weight loss, female ovariectomized Trem2−/− and Trem2−/− mice were placed on LFD and HFD to generate lean, obese, and weight loss groups and injected with E0771PD-L1 after 20 weeks on diet. There were no differences in body weight trajectories between genotypes within each diet group (Fig. 4A). Plasma levels of sTREM2 were increased in the obese Trem2+/+ animals relative to both the lean and weight loss Trem2+/+ mice, and the Trem2−/− animals demonstrated absence of sTREM2 (Fig. 4B). Similar to chow-fed lean animals (Fig 3D & E), tumor growth in the LFD-fed lean Trem2−/− animals was attenuated relative to the lean Trem2+/+ controls as demonstrated by tumor mass at endpoint and tumor volume over time (Fig. 4C & D). However, Trem2 deficiency did not reduce tumor growth in obese or weight loss mice (Fig. 4C, E & F).

Figure 4. Lean, but not obese or weight loss, Trem2−/− mice exhibit decreased tumor growth.

Figure 4.

A) Body weight (g) measured weekly with dashed lines to indicate time of diet switch and E0771PD-L1 cell injection. For diet groups and genotypes, light green = lean Trem2+/+, dark green = lean Trem2−/−, light blue = obese Trem2+/+, dark blue = obese Trem2−/−, light pink = weight loss Trem2+/+, and maroon = weight loss Trem2−/−. B) sTREM2 (ng/mL) in plasma from Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mice measured by ELISA.C) Tumor mass (g) at study endpoint. D-F) Tumor volume (mm3) over time for lean, obese, and weight loss Trem2+/+ and Trem2−/− mice, respectively. G) Diagram of tumor and tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue CD45+ cell sorting and processing for single cell RNA Sequencing. Mixed effects analysis with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD test was used compare tumor volumes over time between genotypes in the lean group (one missing value in lean Trem2+/+ group at day 28). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used to compare tumor volumes over time between genotypes in obese and weight loss groups. Two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD test was used to compare tumor mass between genotypes in lean, obese, and weight loss groups, * denotes genotype effect (Trem2+/+ vs. Trem2−/−), †denotes diet effect, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 for genotype differences (Trem2+/+ vs. Trem2−/−) and ††††p<0.0001 for diet differences. All data plotted as mean ± SEM for n=4-23 per group. Figure G was created with Biorender.com.

Single cell RNA sequencing revealed increased expression of antigen presentation genes in tumor-associated macrophages in lean Trem2−/− mice

To gain deeper insights into the immunological landscape of the tumor and the mATTum-adj, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing on CD45+ immune cells (Fig. 4H). UMAP analysis identified 21 clusters in the tumor and 33 clusters in the mATTum-adj (Supp. Fig. 4A & B). The top 3 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for each cluster are shown in Supplemental Figures 4C and D. Because Trem2 expression is restricted to myeloid cells, myeloid populations from the tumor and mATTum-adj were subset and reclustered (Fig. 5A & B), and the frequencies of each cell population within each tissue were calculated (Fig. 5C & D). Our RT-PCR data showed that whole tumor Trem2 expression is not impacted by obesity or weight loss (Fig 2B). In our scRNAseq data set, Trem2, which is predominantly expressed in the Macro_C1qc subcluster, a more pro-inflammatory macrophage population involved in antigen presentation, shows no variation between diet groups in the tumor (Fig. 5E). However, in mATTum-adj, obesity increased Trem2 expression in the LAM population, as has been shown to occur in other adipose tissue depots10,12 (Fig. 5F). The top 5 DEGs between the lean Trem2+/+ and lean Trem2 were determined within the tumor Macro_C1qc population and subsequently assessed in all groups (Fig. 5G). Four out of the top 5 DEGs, H2-Eb1, H2-Ab1, H2-Aa, and Cd74, were relatively increased in the lean Trem2−/− Macro_C1qc (tumor) and LAM (mAT) populations compared to the lean Trem2+/+ group (Fig. 5H). These genes are integral to antigen presentation, which directed our focus to T cell populations.

Figure 5. Myeloid populations in tumors and tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissues (mATTum-adj) analyzed by single-cell RNA sequencing.

Figure 5.

A-B) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of tumor (A) and mATTum-adj (B) myeloid cell subclusters from merged conditions labeled broadly by cell type category and colored by high-resolution cell type identities. C-D) Myeloid cell subcluster proportions expressed as frequency (%) split by diet-genotype groups for tumor (C) and mATTum-adj (D). E-F) Trem2 expression in lean, obese, and weight loss Trem2+/+ mice in tumor (E) and mATTum-adj (F). G) Dot plot of the top 5 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between lean Trem2+/+ and lean Trem2−/− tumor Macro_C1qc subclusters. Genes include H2-Eb1, H2-Ab1, H2-Aa, Cd74, and Trem2. Log fold change is shown for all 6 diet-genotype groups. H) Dot plot of H2-Eb1, H2-Ab1, H2-Aa, Cd74, and Trem2 log fold change in the mATTum-adj LAM subcluster shown in all 6 diet-genotype groups.

Clonal T cell populations were shifted from an exhausted to effector state in tumors from lean but not obese or weight loss Trem2−/− mice

Initial analysis of the tumor T cell populations included both cell proportions, shown as cells/g tumor, and frequency (Fig. 6A & B), as well as subclustering of the tumor T cell populations (Fig. 6C). In the lean groups, Trem2−/− tumors showed an increase of CD8+ TEM and CD4+ Th1 cells calculated as percentage and number of cells/g tumor compared to Trem2+/+ controls. These two T cell populations also increased in Trem2−/− conditions compared to Trem2+/+ conditions in the obese mice; however, there were markedly reduced cells/g tumor in obese animals of both genotypes. In contrast to the lean mice, in the weight loss group, CD8+ TEM and CD4+ Th1 cells were reduced with Trem2 knockout compared to their diet-matched controls (Fig. 6A & B). Because T cell clonal expansion is integral for targeting and killing tumor cells, tumor T cell clonality (number of cells sharing a clonotype) was visualized by projection of clonal cell counts onto the re-clustered tumor T cell UMAP split by diet and genotype (Fig. 6D - I). Highly clonal populations of exhausted CD8+ T cells (TEX) were found in lean Trem2+/+ tumors (Fig. 6D). In tumors from lean Trem2−/− mice, the clonal populations were detected in CD8+ TEM and CD4+ Th1 cells (Fig. 6E). In the obese animals, there were fewer highly clonal populations overall; however, the shift toward increased CD8+ TEM populations in the Trem2−/− persisted compared to Trem2+/+ tumors (Fig. 6F & G). In the weight loss animals, the Trem2+/+ group harbored a robust clonal population of CD8+ TEX cells while the weight loss Trem2−/− T cells demonstrated a marked decrease of overall clonality (Fig. 6H & I). Strikingly, the rich abundance of highly clonal CD4+ Th1 cells in lean Trem2−/− tumors was absent from the other diet and genotype groups. Binning of T cells clones into singlets and low, moderate, or high clonality bins (low = x ≤ 12 (median); moderate = 13 ≤ x ≤ 79 (3rd quartile cutoff); high = x >79) reinforced this increase of CD4+ Th1 cells in the lean Trem2−/− tumors (Fig. 6J). In the lean and obese groups, binning also highlighted the expansion of highly clonal CD8+ TEM in the Trem2−/− mice compared to their diet-matched Trem2+/+ controls; however, this robust expansion was not observed in the weight loss animals. Given the substantial differences in tumor T cell clonality between diet and genotype groups, and considering the impact of the adipose tissue microenvironment, we proceeded to investigate the clonotypes not only within the tumor but also in the mATTum-adj.

Figure 6. Visualization and binning of Tumor T cell clones reveals expansion of highly clonal CD4+ Th1 cells in lean Trem2−/− tumors.

Figure 6.

A) Stacked bar graph of tumor T cell subclusters indicating cells per gram of tumor across all 6 diet-genotype groups. B) Tumor T cell subcluster proportions expressed as frequency (%) across all 6 diet-genotype groups. C) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of tumor T cell subclusters from merged conditions colored by high-resolution cell type identities. D-I) Tumor T cell clones with a clonal population of two or more visualized by mapping clonal cell counts, indicated by color, onto the tumor T cell UMAP. The data is split as labeled by diet and genotype. J) Stacked bar graph showing the distribution of tumor T cell subclusters, binned as single cells or clonal low, clonal moderate, or clonal high (low = x ≤ 12 (median); moderate = 13 ≤ x ≤ 79 (3rd quartile cutoff); high = x >79) shown for all 6 diet-genotype groups.

Identification of identical clonotypes in tumor and mATTum-adj

Clonally expanded T cells have been shown to reside in both tumors and adipose tissue, but whether there are any shared clones that traffic between the two has not been reported. By sequencing the beta chain of the T cell receptor (TCRβ), we determined clonotypes based on the complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3). T cell clones were categorized into three groups: tumor-only clones, which were identified exclusively in the tumor, adipose-only clones, which were found solely in the mATTum-adj, and dual-tissue clones, which were identified by the presence of the same TCRβ in both the tumor and the mATTum-adj (Fig. 7A). Heat maps of tumor-only and adipose-only clones, when overlaid on their respective re-clustered T cell UMAPs, show that single tissue clones were distributed across all identified T cell populations within each diet-genotype group (Fig. 7 B - D). Heat maps of tumor dual-tissue clones revealed that lean Trem2+/+ control tumors primarily contain CD8+ TEM dual-tissue clones, whereas lean Trem2−/− tumors exhibit dual-tissue clones distributed across CD8+ TEX, CD8+ TEM, and CD4+ Th1 populations (Fig. 7E). Both obese genotype groups harbor primarily CD8+ TEM dual-tissue clones in the tumor (Fig. 7E). However, the weight loss animals exhibit a flipped phenotype from the lean animals wherein the Trem2++/+ tumors show a spread of dual-tissue clones across CD8+ TEX, CD8+ TEM, and CD4+ Th1 populations and the Trem2−/− tumors primarily contain CD8+ TEM clones (Fig. 7E). Heat maps of mATTum-adj dual-tissue clones show that lean and obese Trem2−/− mATTum-adj exhibit more dual tissue clones compared to their Trem2+/+ diet-matched controls; however, both weight loss groups show a diminishment of dual-tissue clones within the mATTum-adj (Fig. 7F).

Figure 7. Identification of dual-tissue clones in tumor and tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum-adj).

Figure 7.

A) Schematic illustrating tumor-only, adipose-only, and dual-tissue clones. B) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of mATTum-adj T cell subclusters from merged conditions colored by high-resolution cell type identities. C) Heat map of tumor-only clones projected onto tumor T cell UMAP. D) Heat map of adipose-only clones projected on mATTum-adj T cell UMAP. E) Heat map of dual-tissue clones identified in the tumor projected on tumor T cell UMAP. F) Heat map of dual-tissue clones identified in the mATTum-adj projected on mATTum-adj T cell UMAP. G) Stacked bar graph showing the number of clonotypes identified in the mATTum-adj, sorted by dual-tissue and adipose-only clones. The percentage of dual-tissue clones for each diet-genotype group is displayed at the top of each bar. H) Stacked bar graph showing the number of clonotypes identified in the tumor, sorted by dual-tissue and tumor-only clones. The percentage of dual-tissue clones for each diet-genotype group is displayed at the top of each bar. I) Cell counts of dual-tissue T cell clones identified in the mATTum-adj. Cell count data is colored in stacked bar graph by course T cell subclusters. J) Cell counts of dual-tissue T cell clones identified in the tumor. Cell count data is colored in stacked bar graph by high-resolution T cell subclusters. K) Cell counts of adipose-only clones identified in the mATTum-adj. Cell count data is colored in stacked bar graph by course T cell subclusters. L) Cell counts of tumor-only clones identified in the mATTum-adj. Cell count data is colored in stacked bar graph by high-resolution T cell subclusters. Figure 7A was created with Biorender.com.

Subsequently, within the mATTum-adj, we quantified the number of adipose-only clonotypes and dual-tissue clonotypes. This analysis revealed that in nearly every group, at least 40% of the clonotypes identified in the mATTum-adj were also found in the tumor (Figure 7G). Importantly, this analysis also showed an increase in dual-tissue clonotypes in the lean and obese Trem2−/− mATTum-adj compared to the diet-matched Trem2++/+ controls, along with a striking reduction in the number of clonotypes in both weight loss groups. Quantification of clonotypes in the tumor highlighted that a significantly smaller proportion of the clonotypes identified in the tumor were also detected in the mATTum-adj (Fig. 7H). Thereafter, we quantified the cell counts for the clonotypes within each tissue and further categorized the data using coarse T cell clustering in the mATTum-adj and fine T cell clustering in the tumor. In the mATTum-adj, the dual-tissue CD8+ T cells were increased in the lean Trem2−/− samples compared to the lean Trem2+/+ controls and even further increased in the obese Trem2−/− animals. In contrast, the number of CD8+ T cells in weight loss Trem2−/− mATTum-adj decreased compared to the weight loss Trem2+/+ mAT (Fig. 7I). Concurrently, in the tumor, the cell counts of dual-tissue CD8+ TEM, CD8+ TEX, and CD4+ Th1 cells demonstrated a striking increase in the lean and obese Trem2−/− tumors compared to the diet-matched Trem2+/+ tumors with greatest number of dual-tissue T cells in the lean Trem2−/− tumors (Fig. 7J). Similar to the mATTum-adj, the weight loss tumors exhibited a reduction of dual-tissue T cells in the Trem2−/− animals (Fig. 7J). The adipose-only clone cell counts are predominantly composed of NKT and Treg clones, indicating that NKT and Treg populations were mainly restricted to the mATTum-adj. In contrast, CD8+ T cells appear more likely to be identified as a dual-tissue clone between the mATTum-adj and the tumor (Fig. 7K). Contrastingly, each diet-genotype group possessed all T cell populations in the tumor-only clone cell counts analysis (Fig. 7L).

Obese mice are resistant to αPD-1 treatment and do not exhibit an increase in activated T cells

Clinical studies in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer have suggested obesity may induce a “paradoxical effect” with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment – a scenario in which obese patients respond more favorably than lean patients42,43; however, this has not been well studied in postmenopausal breast cancer or in the context of weight loss. VDJ sequencing and scRNAseq analysis revealed that tumors from Trem2+/+ lean and weight loss mice had a higher number of all T cell populations per gram tumor and a greater abundance of highly clonal CD8+ TEX cells compared to tumors from obese mice (Fig. 6A & J). Consequently, to investigate the response of obese and weight loss mice to αPD-1 treatment in a postmenopausal breast cancer model, ovariectomized mice were placed on LFD and HFD to generate lean, obese, and weight loss groups with food intake and body weight recorded (Supp. Fig. 5A - C). Mice were injected with E0771PD-L1 cells at 20 weeks on diet and treated with IgG or αPD-1 antibody during the final 8 d of tumor monitoring (Fig. 8A). Lean and weight loss mice responded to the αPD-1 treatment as evidenced by decreased tumor mass and tumor volume (Fig. 8B, C, E; individual tumor growth curves - Supp. Fig. 5D). Obese IgG and αPD-1 treated groups exhibited no statistical differences in tumor mass or tumor volume at any time point (Fig. 8B & D; Supp. Fig. 5D). To better understand the interactions between the tumor and surrounding mAT, CD11b+ cells and T cells were isolated from the stromal vascular fraction of the mATTum-adj by fractionation and sequential magnetic sorting using CD11b microbeads followed by CD4/CD8 microbeads (Fig. 8F; Supp. Fig. 5E & F). Gene expression of T cell activation markers Pdcd1, Tigit, Tox, and Lag3 were increased in the lean αPD-1 mATTum-adj T cells compared to the lean IgG (Fig. 8G). Within the obese group, there were no differences in T cell activation marker gene expression between antibody treatment groups; however, Pdcd1, Tox, and Lag3 expression were reduced in the obese αPD-1 group compared to the lean αPD-1 treated animals (Fig. 8G). Gene expression on tumor whole tissue lysates revealed an increase in Cd8a, Pdcd1, Lag3, as well as Trem2 in the weight loss aPD-1 treatment group with no differences found in the obese group (Fig. 8H). In addition, expression of LAM genes Trem2, Plin2, and Cd36 in the isolated CD11b+ cells reproduced an increase of LAMs in obese mATTum-adj and mATContra that was not impacted by αPD-1 treatment (Supp. Fig. 5G & H).

Figure 8. Obese mice do not respond to αPD-1 therapy and do not exhibit an increase of T cell activation markers in tumor-adjacent mammary adipose tissue (mATTum-adj) or tumor.

Figure 8.

A) Schematic of study design for lean, obese, and weight loss breast cancer model treated with IgG and αPD-1. During the last two weeks of tumor monitoring, mice were injected with either αPD-1 or IgG isotype control. B) Tumor mass (g) at study endpoint. C-E) Tumor volume (mm3) over time for lean, obese, and weight loss IgG and αPD-1 treated mice with dashed line to indicate start of antibody treatment. F) Schematic of isolating the stromal vascular fraction from the mATTum-adj and subsequently isolating a pooled sample of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells using the magnetic Miltenyi Octomacs microbead sorting system. G) T cell activation markers, Pdcd1, Tigit, Tox, and Lag3 relative gene expression by RT-PCR from magnetically sorted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from the mATTum-adj. H) Cd8a, Pdcd1, Lag3, and Trem2 gene expression by RT-PCR from whole tumor lysates. Due to the response to aPD-1 treatment in the lean mice, only two tumors from the lean αPD-1 group could be analyzed by RT-PCR. For diet groups, solid colors: green = lean IgG, blue = obese IgG, pink = weight loss IgG; open circles: dark green = lean αPD-1, dark blue = obese αPD-1, maroon = weight loss αPD-1. Two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD test was used to compare groups for tumor mass. Mixed effects analysis was used for statistical analysis of tumor volumes over time. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used to compare groups in the T cell activation marker gene expression analysis. All data plotted as mean ± SEM for 2-6 mice per group. *denotes antibody effect (IgG vs. αPD-1), †denotes diet effect, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001; †p<0.05, ††p<0.01. Figures 2A, F, & H were created with Biorender.com.

Discussion

In this study, we developed lean, obese, and weight loss models of postmenopausal breast cancer to evaluate the effects of Trem2 deficiency and immune checkpoint therapy, resulting in three main insights: 1) Trem2 deficiency attenuated tumor growth in lean, but not obese or weight loss mice. 2) Identical T cell clonotypes were detected in the tumor and mATTum-adj of the same animal. 3) αPD-1 treatment restricted tumor growth of PD-L1-expressing tumor cells in lean and weight loss mice, but obese mice demonstrated resistance to immune checkpoint therapy. Overall, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of how weight history impacts the immunological landscape of postmenopausal breast cancer and the potential for TREM2 targeting, with implications for personalized medicine.

Our study, along with previous research in colorectal cancer, sarcoma models, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer15,17,18, confirms that Trem2 deficiency inhibits tumor growth in chow-fed mice. ScRNAseq of tumor immune cells under Trem2-deficient conditions by other groups has revealed an increase in CD8+ T cells in the MCA/1956 sarcoma model15,17 and an increase in both CD8+ T cells and NKT cells in the PY8119 TNBC model44. In agreement with these findings, we also report an increase in CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ TEM cells in tumors from lean Trem2−/− mice. However, previous studies by other groups were limited to the lean, chow-fed state. Our study focused on human-relevant conditions by examining the effects of Trem2 deficiency in both obese and weight loss conditions. In addition, we assessed T cells and T cell clonality. In lean Trem2+/+ tumors, the predominant clonal populations are exhausted CD8+ T cells; however, in lean Trem2−/− tumors, these populations shift toward an effector memory state and is also associated with an increase of CD4+ Th1 cells. This shift does not occur in obese or weight loss states, where the clonal cells predominantly remain exhausted. Greater numbers of TEM cells suggests a potent anti-tumor immune response occurred that was supported by the high frequency of CD4+ Th1 cells driving a pro-inflammatory response. Ultimately, this unique cellular composition could contribute to the tumor attenuation phenotype found in lean, but not obese or weight loss, states.

By utilizing scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing in both the tumor and mATTum-adj, we were able perform side-by-side analysis of T cell clonotypes in these two tissues from the same animal. To our knowledge, this approach has not been performed previously for any cancer types. Intriguingly, we found numerous incidents of identical T cell clonotypes within the tumor and mATTum-adj of the same mouse, which we termed “dual-tissue clones”. Notably, in the mATTum-adj, 40% or more of the T cell clonotypes were dual-tissue clones in nearly all conditions, even reaching 74% in the lean Trem2−/− tissue. In fact, the number of dual tissue clones nearly doubles in lean Trem2−/− compared with lean Trem2+/+ mice, suggesting that absence of Trem2 on myeloid cells has immediate consequences for clonal expansion of T cells. This effect of Trem2 deficiency was also seen in obese, but not weight loss mice. The tumor contains an overwhelming number of T cells compared to the mATTum-adj; however, up to 4.1% of tumor clonotypes were identified as dual-tissue, with thousands of dual-tissue clonal cells detected in the tumor. Interestingly, tumor dual-tissue clone counts were reduced in the obese tumors and nearly ablated in weight loss, suggesting some perturbation resulting in loss of dual-tissue clones could have occurred in obesity that were not recovered with weight loss. Overall, these data suggest the potential for trafficking of T cells between tumors and nearby adipose tissue. This observation could indicate that the adipose tissue may even act as a reservoir of T cells for the tumor. The absence of tumor attenuation in weight loss Trem2−/− mice, coupled with the near ablation of dual-tissue clones in the tumor and mATTum-adj, suggests that the potential trafficking of dual-tissue clones is a crucial component of anti-tumor immunity associated with blocking Trem2. The minimal occurrence of identical clonotypes between the tumor and mATTum-adj that were not derived from the same mouse (data not shown) strengthens our confidence in the data, further supporting the trafficking pattern of cells between the two tissues. T cell clonality in tumor-associated adipose tissue may also have relevance for other cancers where obesity serves as a prognostic indicator, including colorectal carcinoma and pancreatic cancer. In the future, this finding could have implications for developing treatments to invigorate adipose tissue T cells against tumors.

Despite the known association between obesity and cancer risk, current research reveals that in certain types of cancer, obesity may improve patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. This phenomenon has been termed the “obesity paradox”. Retrospective studies including non-small cell lung cancer43, melanoma42, and renal cell carcinoma45 have demonstrated improved overall survival and progression-free survival for obese patients treated with αPD-1 or αPD-L1 therapy. A meta-analysis including 16 cancer types demonstrated improved overall survival and progression free survival for obese breast cancer patients compared to patients with a BMI < 3046. However, for breast cancer, this study only included 8 obese patients and did not indicate menopausal status, which highlights the need for further research on breast cancer and immune checkpoint therapy within the context of obesity. Clinical trial data assessed by Pietenpol’s lab demonstrated obese TNBC patients trended towards increased benefit from combination therapy of carboplatin and atezolizumab, an αPD-L1 therapy, compared to normal and overweight patients47. To our knowledge, no retrospective human studies have investigated the interplay between weight loss and immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of this relationship. In our studies, we show that the postmenopausal obese mice do not respond to αPD-1 therapy, which contradicts the obesity paradox. Previous work from the Makowski lab showed that pre-menopausal obese mice responded to the αPD-1 therapy48. Other differences between these studies are PD-L1 expression on the tumor cells in our study, and the use of irradiated diets in the Makowski study. Interestingly, Makowski also shows that premenopausal obese mice do not respond to αPD-L1 treatment22. In human studies, the level of PD-L1 expression on the tumor cells as well as the menopausal status may be important contributors to whether the obesity paradox prevails. Gaining insights into the interplay of these variables combined with obesity and weight loss will be essential for improving breast cancer patient outcomes.

The effectiveness of PD-1 blockade therapies is thought to hinge upon the ability to reinvigorate progenitor CD8+ TEX cells, which have the potential to regain their effector functions, unlike terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells49. Some studies have suggested that the excess adiposity in obesity induces an increased population of PD-1+ CD8+ T cells, which has been implicated in the obesity paradox50. Analysis of the Trem2+/+ groups in the scRNAseq data from our study reveals a significant decrease in the number of total CD8+ T cells per gram tumor and a reduction in highly clonal CD8+ T cells in obese tumors compared to lean and weight loss conditions. The scarcity of T cells in obese tumors may account the absence of a response to αPD-1 therapy. It is also possible that CD8+ TEX cells in obese tumors are terminally exhausted, whereas the CD8+ TEX in lean and weight loss tumors might not yet be terminally exhausted, thus permitting efficacy of αPD-1 treatment. Further studies are required to assess how breast tumors in lean, obese, and weight loss settings respond to αPD-1 therapy, including retrospective studies on breast cancer patients. Future findings from these studies should guide clinicians to consider weight history when evaluating immune checkpoint therapies, recognizing that responses of different types of tumors may vary in the obese context.

Recently, weight loss drugs, especially GLP-1 receptor agonists, have surged in popularity due to their efficacy and transformative impact on weight management, highlighting the importance of addressing weight loss in our studies. Considering that our study indicates tumors respond differently under weight loss conditions compared to a lean state, it is crucial for clinicians to consider patients’ weight history when considering treatment options – especially when immunotherapies will be employed. Furthermore, many patients are prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists, and after losing weight, discontinue use of the medication and subsequently regain the weight. Given the rise in weight loss-associated medications, and our limited knowledge on the implications of these therapeutics on tumor growth, future studies must continue to investigate both weight loss and weight regain in the context of both weight loss-associated medications and caloric restriction.

A key strength of our study is that all diet-genotype groups in the scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing experiments included reasonable sample sizes of 3 or 4 per group, with samples processed on separate lanes, ensuring independent and robust biological replication. A limitation of our study is that while the identification of identical T cell clonotypes in the tumor and mATTum-adj suggests trafficking of T cells between the two tissues, our data does not explicitly show the movement of the T cells. Accordingly, while we hypothesize that the adipose tissue could be acting as a reservoir of T cells for the tumor, we are not able to show any directionality of any potential trafficking, which means the T cells could also be moving from the tumor to the surrounding adipose tissue. Finally, since scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing only analyze a subset of the immune cells from the tumor and mATTum-adj, our interpretation of the data is limited to drawing inferences from the cells that were captured. Future studies from this work should include analysis of lean, obese, and weight loss response to immune checkpoint therapy in the context of Trem2 deficiency or antibody treatment. Additionally, although many patients are either obese or have lost weight, weight cycling – characterized by alternating periods of weight gain and loss10 – is more common and should be addressed in future studies.

By examining obesity and weight loss across various contexts, including Trem2 deficiency and immune checkpoint therapy, and assessing both the tumor and surrounding adipose tissue in all studies, we have gained significant insights into how weight history affects both adipose tissue and the tumor microenvironment. Our data suggest a potential crosstalk between these tissues, possibly involving T cell trafficking. These findings indicate that weight history is a critical factor for clinicians to consider in patient care, as its effects may vary depending on the specific clinical scenario.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (4.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jamie Garcia, PhD, for assistance with cell isolation and preparation for scRNAseq. Ovariectomies were performed at the VMMPC, and the authors would like to thank Carlo Malabanan, Alicia Kellarakos, Tiffany Farmer, and Teri Doss for performing the ovariectomy surgeries. Tumor cell injections and body composition measurements were also performed in the VMMPC, which is supported by DK135073 (MMPC-Live) and DK020593 (DRTC). Isolation of CD45+ cells in preparation for scRNAseq was performed in the VUMC Flow Cytometry Shared Resource. The VUMC Flow Cytometry Shared Resource is supported by the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA68485) and the Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research Center (DK058404). scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing was performed in the Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics (VANTAGE) core laboratory, which is supported in part by Clinical and Translational Science Award Grant 5UL1 RR024975-03, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center Grant P30 CA68485, Vanderbilt Vision Center Grant P30 EY08126, and National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources Grant G20 RR030956. Analysis of scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing utilized the resources provided by the Vanderbilt Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education (ACCRE), which is operated by and for Vanderbilt faculty.

Funding

This project was funded by a Pilot and Feasibility Award from the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC; P30CA068485) Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE; P50CA098131) program to AHH and a Mark Foundation Endeavor Award to JCR, LM, and KEW. EWP was supported by the Immunological Mechanisms of Disease Training Program (5T32Al138932) and the Mark Foundation Endeavor Award. AHH was supported by a Career Scientist Award from the Veterans Affairs (IK6 BX005649) and a Veterans Affairs Merit Award (I01 BX002195). LM and JCR are supported by NCI U01CA272541 and LM by R01CA253329. BDL is supported by a Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program grant (BC201286). JAP is supported by a Breast SPORE (P50CA098131).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest disclosure statement: JCR is a founder and consultant for Sitryx Therapeutics.

Citations

  • 1.Hales C. M., Carroll M. D., Fryar C. D. & Ogden C. L. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief (2020). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reeves G. K. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: Cohort study. Br Med J 335, (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaviani A., Neishaboury M. R., Mohammadzadeh N., Ansari-Damavandi M. & Jamei K. Effects of obesity on presentation of breast cancer, lymph node metastasis and patient survival: A retrospective review. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 14, (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Osman M. A. & Hennessy B. T. Obesity correlation with metastases development and response to first-line metastatic chemotherapy in breast cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol 9, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chan D. S. M. et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer— systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Annals of Oncology vol. 25 Preprint at 10.1093/annonc/mdu042 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Picon-Ruiz M., Morata-Tarifa C., Valle-Goffin J. J., Friedman E. R. & Slingerland J. M. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin 67, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiralerspong S. & Goodwin P. J. Obesity and breast cancer prognosis: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Clinical Oncology vol. 34 Preprint at 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.4480 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simone V. et al. Obesity and Breast Cancer: Molecular Interconnections and Potential Clinical Applications. Oncologist 21, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishimura S. et al. CD8+ effector T cells contribute to macrophage recruitment and adipose tissue inflammation in obesity. Nat Med 15, (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cottam M. A., Caslin H. L., Winn N. C. & Hasty A. H. Multiomics reveals persistence of obesity-associated immune cell phenotypes in adipose tissue during weight loss and weight regain in mice. Nat Commun 13, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Winn N. C., Wolf E. M., Garcia J. N. & Hasty A. H. Exon 2-mediated deletion of Trem2 does not worsen metabolic function in diet-induced obese mice. Journal of Physiology 600, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaitin D. A. et al. Lipid-Associated Macrophages Control Metabolic Homeostasis in a Trem2-Dependent Manner. Cell 178, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kober D. L. & Brett T. J. TREM2-Ligand Interactions in Health and Disease. Journal of Molecular Biology vol. 429 Preprint at 10.1016/jjmb.2017.04.004 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deczkowska A., Weiner A. & Amit I. The Physiology, Pathology, and Potential Therapeutic Applications of the TREM2 Signaling Pathway. Cell vol. 181 Preprint at 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.003 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molgora M. et al. TREM2 Modulation Remodels the Tumor Myeloid Landscape Enhancing Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell 182, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wolf E. M., Fingleton B. & Hasty A. H. The therapeutic potential of TREM2 in cancer. Frontiers in Oncology vol. 12 Preprint at 10.3389/fonc.2022.984193 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katzenelenbogen Y. et al. Coupled scRNA-Seq and Intracellular Protein Activity Reveal an Immunosuppressive Role of TREM2 in Cancer. Cell 182, (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Binnewies M. et al. Targeting TREM2 on tumor-associated macrophages enhances immunotherapy. Cell Rep 37, (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Čelešnik H. & Potočnik U. Peripheral Blood Transcriptome in Breast Cancer Patients as a Source of Less Invasive Immune Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine, and Implications for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers vol. 14 Preprint at 10.3390/cancers14030591 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves pembrolizumab for high-risk earlystage triple-negative breast cancer. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves atezolizumab for PD-L1 positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sipe L. M. et al. Response to immune checkpoint blockade improved in pre-clinical model of breast cancer after bariatric surgery. Elife 11, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chlebowski R. T. et al. Weight loss and breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women. Cancer 125, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Teras L. R. et al. Sustained Weight Loss and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women 50 Years and Older: A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Data. J Natl Cancer Inst 112, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zamarron B. F. et al. Macrophage proliferation sustains adipose tissue inflammation in formerly obese mice. Diabetes 66, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kratz M. et al. Improvements in glycemic control after gastric bypass occur despite persistent adipose tissue inflammation. Obesity 24, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magkos F. et al. Effects of Moderate and Subsequent Progressive Weight Loss on Metabolic Function and Adipose Tissue Biology in Humans with Obesity. Cell Metab 23, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cancello R. et al. Permanence of molecular features of obesity in subcutaneous adipose tissue of ex-obese subjects. Int J Obes 37, (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jung D. Y. et al. Short-term weight loss attenuates local tissue inflammation and improves insulin sensitivity without affecting adipose inflammation in obese mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 304, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhong L. et al. Soluble TREM2 ameliorates pathological phenotypes by modulating microglial functions in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat Commun 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Winn N. C., Wolf E. M., Cottam M. A., Bhanot M. & Hasty A. H. Myeloid-specific deletion of ferroportin impairs macrophage bioenergetics but is disconnected from systemic insulin action in adult mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 321, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heiser C. N., Wang V. M., Chen B., Hughey J. J. & Lau K. S. Automated quality control and cell identification of droplet-based single-cell data using dropkick. Genome Res 31, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Germain P. L., Lun A., Macnair W. & Robinson M. D. Doublet identification in singlecell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Res 10, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wolf F. A., Angerer P. & Theis F. J. SCANPY: Large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 19, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Korsunsky I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods 16, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheng S. et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell 184, (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Andreatta M. et al. Interpretation of T cell states from single-cell transcriptomics data using reference atlases. Nat Commun 12, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gayoso A. et al. A Python library for probabilistic analysis of single-cell omics data. Nature Biotechnology vol. 40 Preprint at 10.1038/s41587-021-01206-w (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Feng H., Lin L. & Chen J. scDIOR: single cell RNA-seq data IO software. BMC Bioinformatics 23, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hao Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol 42, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Korsunsky I., Nathan A., Millard N. & Raychaudhuri S. Presto scales Wilcoxon and auROC analyses to millions of observations. bioRxiv (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Z. et al. Paradoxical effects of obesity on T cell function during tumor progression and PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 25, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kichenadasse G. et al. Association between Body Mass Index and Overall Survival with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol 6, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Timperi E. et al. Lipid-Associated Macrophages Are Induced by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Mediate Immune Suppression in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 82, (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cortellini A. et al. A multicenter study of body mass index in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: When overweight becomes favorable. J Immunother Cancer 7, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yoo S. K., Chowell D., Valero C., Morris L. G. T. & Chan T. A. Outcomes among Patients with or Without Obesity and with Cancer Following Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. JAMA Network Open Preprint at 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0448 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lehmann B. D. et al. Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The TBCRC 043 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 10, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pingili A. K. et al. Immune checkpoint blockade reprograms systemic immune landscape and tumor microenvironment in obesity-associated breast cancer. Cell Rep 35, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Miller B. C. et al. Subsets of exhausted CD8+ T cells differentially mediate tumor control and respond to checkpoint blockade. Nat Immunol 20, 326–336 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang C. et al. STAT3 Activation-Induced Fatty Acid Oxidation in CD8+ T Effector Cells Is Critical for Obesity-Promoted Breast Tumor Growth. Cell Metab 31, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (4.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Both the raw and processed scRNAseq and VDJ sequencing data in this study have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and will be made available prior to publication. The GEO Accession Number is GSE278003.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES