Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2024 Sep 26;18(1):wrae188. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae188

Hidden syndinian and perkinsid infections in dinoflagellate hosts revealed by single-cell transcriptomics

Elizabeth C Cooney 1,, Brian S Leander 2,3, Patrick J Keeling 4
PMCID: PMC11468006  PMID: 39325969

Abstract

Free-living core dinoflagellates are commonly infected by members of two parasitic clades that are themselves closely related to dinoflagellates, the marine alveolates and perkinsids. These parasites are abundant and ecologically important, but most species have been difficult to observe directly or cultivate, so our knowledge of them is usually restricted to environmental 18S rRNA gene sequences, as genome-scale molecular data are not available for most species. Here, we report the finding of several of these parasites infecting free-living dinoflagellates. Of the 14 infected host cells collected, only five were identified as containing parasites via light microscopy at the time of collection. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing yielded relatively high transcriptomic coverage for parasites as well as their hosts. Host and parasite homologs were distinguished phylogenetically, allowing us to infer a robust phylogenomic tree based on 192 genes. The tree showed one parasite belongs to an undescribed lineage that is sister to perkinsids, whereas the remainder are members of the syndinian clade within the marine alveolates. Close relatives of all these parasites have been observed in 18S rRNA gene surveys, but until now none had been linked to a specific host. These findings illustrate the efficacy of single-cell isolation and transcriptome sequencing as strategies for gaining deeper insights into the evolutionary history and host relationships of hidden single-celled parasites.

Keywords: MALV, dinoflagellate, single-cell transcriptomics, parasite, Amoebophrya, perkinsid

Introduction

In dinoflagellates and close relatives, parasitism has arisen multiple times, resulting in many independent lineages that infect diverse protist and metazoan hosts [1]. While parasitic dinoflagellates have long been documented [2], it was not until the use of environmental 18S rRNA gene sequencing that their depth of diversity and potential ecological impact became clear: not only are these parasites globally distributed, but in the oceans they account for several of the most abundant eukaryotic lineages known [3, 4].

Phylogenies have revealed that one important parasitic group, the marine alveolates (MALVs), is composed of at least five distinct subgroups [5] that cluster into two major lineages: MALVs II and IV (the Syndiniales, or “syndinians”), and MALVs I, III, and V [1]. Despite accounting for up to 50% of eukaryotic sequences in environmental samples and being thought to be the dominant parasitic group within the picoplanktonic size fraction [6–9], visual observations of most MALV species are scant or non-existent, as they are likely tiny in their free-living stages and difficult to detect when inside a host. Another major subgroup of parasites branching sister to dinoflagellates, the perkinsids, are less abundant in environmental samples but more widely distributed, as they are also common in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems [10, 11].

Both MALVs and perkinsids infect a wide variety of host animals and protists, including the closely related core dinoflagellates [12–14]. In particular, Amoebophrya and other members of the syndinian MALV II clade [5] infect many free-living dinoflagellates, including toxic species, contributing so significantly to bloom depletion that they surpass zooplankton grazers in some cases [15, 16]. For this reason, Amoebophrya is relatively well studied, but little is known about host-specificity or the diversity of its hosts, because most dinoflagellates are not in culture and early stages of infection are not always visible in cells observed in the field.

While conducting a large single-cell transcriptome sequencing survey to investigate the molecular diversity of uncultured marine dinoflagellates, we discovered that a subset of the cells we collected (14 in total out of 168 cells analyzed) were infected by syndinian MALV IIs or perkinsids (Table S1). Hosts were a range of core dinoflagellates, including photosynthetic and heterotrophic species, as well as thecate and athecate species. Uninfected individuals of most host species were also collected, or in a few cases already had transcriptome data available, giving us paired infected/uninfected datasets. We performed a multi-protein phylogenomic analysis on all cells by searching for 263 conserved genes in each transcriptome (Table S2) and generating trees for all genes [17]. For each gene, host and parasite orthologs (and contamination) were differentiated based on phylogenetic affinities to closely related species included in the alignments. This approach allowed us to resolve the phylogenomic position of parasites independent of their hosts. For further details of this methodology, see Supplementary Methods.

The multi-gene phylogeny revealed that all but one parasite clustered with the monophyletic MALV II clade within the syndinians, with the single exception being an infection of Amphidinium sp. that branched sister to the clade containing Maranthos, Parvilucifera, and Perkinsus (Fig. 1). In the same tree, hosts cluster closely with members of the same species, with the exception of KreQI, for which transcriptomes of the same species are not available. For two cells (PhaFC3, UnkQI), host transcripts were very sparse and were thus omitted from this analysis. We also tested these relationships using a phylogeny of 18S rRNA gene sequences, which allows for a much more diverse collection of both cultured and environmentally derived sequences from many more lineages of early-diverging dinoflagellates, including all MALV groups and perkinsids (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum likelihood phylogenomic tree of parasites and their core dinoflagellate hosts. The primary model used to generate this tree from 192 conserved gene alignments is shown with a scale bar representing the estimated number of amino acid substitutions per site. Node numbers indicate bootstrap values ([LG + C60 + F + G4 − bb 1000]/[LG + C60 + F + G4 PMSF −b 100]); black dots signify 100 for both analyses. Transcriptomes introduced in this study are highlighted in black. Host and parasite pairs are connected by colored lines. Cells in light micrographs are all depicted at the same scale; scale bar = 25 μm. For cells with infections that were identifiable at the time of collection, parasites are indicated by asterisks.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogeny inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences showing the diversity of syndinian MALV II and perkinsid parasites. The model used to infer the tree and the scale bar representing the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site are shown next to each clade. Node numbers indicate bootstrap values, with black dots signifying 100. Taxa introduced in this study are highlighted in black. Broken branches are depicted at half their original length.

The 18S rRNA gene phylogeny revealed that the perkinsid relative did not share a close phylogenetic affinity with any currently classified group within the perkinsid clade (i.e. Perkinsus, parviluciferans, and Xcellidae). Instead, it grouped with a clade of environmental sequences branching outside the known perkinsids and was most closely related to sequences retrieved from benthic environments [1]. At the time of collection, there was no visual indication that the marine Amphidinium sp. host cell was infected, other than a red-pigmented area in the center, which has not been observed in non-infected cells of the same species [18]. This ambiguity and the paucity of highly similar sequences in environmental sampling suggest this species is rare and unlikely to be found without extensive molecular screening of potential host species.

All other parasites were confirmed to belong to the syndinian MALV II clade in the 18S rRNA gene phylogeny (Fig. 2). This also suggests that most of these parasites belong to the genus Amoebophrya, because they all branch with clades designated as such; however, the two identical parasites found to infect Akashiwo sanguinea branched outside the well-annotated Amoebophrya clade, so we refer to them simply as “MALV II.” These cells fell within a clade of environmental sequences, all of which lacked information about their potential hosts. A. sanguinea has already been shown to be infected by an Amoebophrya species that is genetically distinct (Fig. 2; [19]), so this is the second member of the MALV II clade now confirmed to infect this host. The 18S rRNA gene sequences of most Amoebophrya sp. collected here shared phylogenetic affinities with existing sequences of parasites infecting closely related hosts. Those infecting Cyklopsia, Erythropsidinium, and Polykrikos, all unarmored cells belonging to the order Gymnodiniales, branched adjacent to one another.

Infections by perkinsids and syndinians that have been studied in any detail lead to host cell death, often relatively quickly. Some of these parasites are easily found due to identifiable signs of infection (e.g. the beehive stage of MALV II or the germ tube in some perkinsids [20]), but for undescribed species of these groups, it is unknown whether we can distinguish infected from uninfected hosts in live samples, as even well-known parasites are nearly invisible during most life stages. Although approaches like environmental sample incubation have proven effective for growing and observing different life stages of some parasite species, these methods are likely not viable for much of their diversity, since many host species, including some in this study, perish hours after collection.

The assemblage of parasites we present here, many of them hidden, demonstrates the efficacy of single-cell isolation and transcriptome sequencing for gaining molecular insights into diverse, uncultured parasites. Although extricating host and parasite transcriptomes can pose a challenge, this method generates a depth of genetic information for parasitic single-celled eukaryotes that can be parsed for robust phylogenomic and functional analysis, unambiguously linking parasites to a host species, and does not require a priori knowledge of the host–parasite interaction. These are all valuable criteria to better understand a major ecological dynamic that is very difficult to study in the absence of cultured systems.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_Methods_wrae188
Table_S1_wrae188
table_s1_wrae188.docx (22.5KB, docx)
Table_S2_wrae188
table_s2_wrae188.docx (23.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted on the ancestral, unceded territory of the xwməθkwəýəm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), Stó:lō, and Səlʼílwətaʔ/Selilwitulh (Tsleil-Waututh) Nations. We thank Jayd Adams for isolating two of the cells in this study and Victoria Jacko-Reynolds for assistance searching benthic environmental databases.

Contributor Information

Elizabeth C Cooney, Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Brian S Leander, Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Patrick J Keeling, Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [P.J.K.: GBMF9201 (https://doi.org/10.37807/GBMF9201)]; the Hakai Institute; and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to B.S.L. (NSERC 2019-03986) and P.J.K. (NSERC 2019-03994).

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article, in the Supplementary Information online, and on Genbank (PP905692-PP905717; SRA: PRJNA1121905). Nucleotide and translated amino acid assemblies and videos are at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/8BIRAL.

References

  • 1. Holt CC, Hehenberger E, Tikhonenkov DVet al. Multiple parallel origins of parasitic marine alveolates. Nat Commun 2023;14:7049. 10.1038/s41467-023-42807-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cachon J, Cachon M. Parasitic dinoflagellates. In: Taylor F.J.R. (ed.), The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1987, 571–610. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. López-García P, Rodríguez-Valera F, Pedrós-Alió Cet al. Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 2001;409:603–7. 10.1038/35054537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Moon-Van Der Staay SY, De Wachter R, Vaulot D. Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity. Nature 2001;409:607–10. 10.1038/35054541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Guillou L, Viprey M, Chambouvet Aet al. Widespread occurrence and genetic diversity of marine parasitoids belonging to Syndiniales (Alveolata). Environ Microbiol 2008;10:3349–65. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01731.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. de Vargas C, Audic S, Henry Net al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 2015;348:1261605. 10.1126/science.1261605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Massana R, Gobet A, Audic Set al. Marine protist diversity in European coastal waters and sediments as revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Environ Microbiol 2015;17:4035–49. 10.1111/1462-2920.12955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Holt CC, Boscaro V, Van Steenkiste NWLet al. Microscopic marine invertebrates are reservoirs for cryptic and diverse protists and fungi. Microbiome 2022;10:161. 10.1186/s40168-022-01363-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Clarke LJ, Bestley S, Bissett Aet al. A globally distributed Syndiniales parasite dominates the Southern Ocean micro-eukaryote community near the sea-ice edge. ISME J 2019;13:734–7. 10.1038/s41396-018-0306-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Metz S, Itoïz S, Obiol Aet al. Global perspective of environmental distribution and diversity of Perkinsea (Alveolata) explored by a meta-analysis of eDNA surveys. Sci Rep 2023;13:20111. 10.1038/s41598-023-47378-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jobard M, Wawrzyniak I, Bronner Get al. Freshwater Perkinsea: diversity, ecology and genomic information. J Plankton Res 2020;42:3–17. 10.1093/plankt/fbz068 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Norén F, Moestrup Ø, Rehnstam-Holm AS. Parvilucifera infectans Noren et Moestrup gen. et sp. nov. (Perkinsozoa phylum nov.): a parasitic flagellate capable of killing toxic microalgae. Eur J Protistol 1999;35:233–54. 10.1016/S0932-4739(99)80001-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Park MG, Yih W, Coats DW. Parasites and phytoplankton, with special emphasis on dinoflagellate infections. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2004;51:145–55. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00539.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Figueroa RI, Garcés E, Massana Ret al. Description, host-specificity, and strain selectivity of the dinoflagellate parasite Parvilucifera sinerae sp. nov. (Perkinsozoa). Protist 2008;159:563–78. 10.1016/j.protis.2008.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Velo-Suárez L, Brosnahan ML, Anderson DMet al. A quantitative assessment of the role of the parasite Amoebophrya in the termination of Alexandrium fundyense blooms within a small coastal embayment. PLoS One 2013;8:e81150. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Montagnes DJS, Chambouvet A, Guillou Let al. Responsibility of microzooplankton and parasite pressure for the demise of toxic dinoflagellate blooms. Aquat Microb Ecol 2008;53:211–25. 10.3354/ame01245 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Burki F, Kaplan M, Tikhonenkov DVet al. Untangling the early diversification of eukaryotes: a phylogenomic study of the evolutionary origins of Centrohelida, Haptophyta and Cryptista. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2016;283:20152802. 10.1098/rspb.2015.2802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cooney EC, Leander BS, Keeling PJ. Phylogenomics shows unique traits in Noctilucales are derived rather than ancestral. PNAS Nexus 2022;1:pgac202. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gunderson JH, Goss SH, Coats DW. The phylogenetic position of Amoebophrya sp. infecting Gymnodinium sanguineum. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999;46:194–7. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04603.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Leander BS, Hoppenrath M. Ultrastructure of a novel tube-forming, intracellular parasite of dinoflagellates: Parvilucifera prorocentri sp. nov. (Alveolata, Myzozoa). Eur J Protistol 2008;44:55–70. 10.1016/j.ejop.2007.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Methods_wrae188
Table_S1_wrae188
table_s1_wrae188.docx (22.5KB, docx)
Table_S2_wrae188
table_s2_wrae188.docx (23.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available in the article, in the Supplementary Information online, and on Genbank (PP905692-PP905717; SRA: PRJNA1121905). Nucleotide and translated amino acid assemblies and videos are at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/8BIRAL.


Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES