ABSTRACT
Lactic acid bacteria are valuable in the production of fermented foods and as sources of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., bacteriocins). The genomes of six lactic acid bacteria, isolated from artisanal cheeses, having biosynthetic gene clusters encoding antimicrobial compounds are reported. The six strains belong to the genera Lacticaseibacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Enterococcus.
KEYWORDS: lactic acid bacteria, bacteriocins, Lactococcus
ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used as starter cultures in dairy fermentations. Additionally, LAB bacteriocins are of particular interest in food preservation (1). The presence of LAB or their metabolites in fermented foods is favorably perceived by the public. Nisin, which is produced by Lactococcus lactis, is the only approved bacteriocin for use in the food industry (2). The emergence of resistance to nisin and its limited efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria necessitate the discovery of new bacteriocins for effective food preservation (3). Bacteriocins often inhibit bacteria closely related to the producers (4). Genome mining for antimicrobial biosynthetic gene clusters, in conjunction with antimicrobial production screening, can guide the isolation of bacteriocins that have potential uses in the food industry.
Artisanal cheeses were purchased from farmer’s markets in Columbus, Ohio, USA during the autumn of 2022. Cheese samples were homogenized, serially diluted, and spread-plated on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, England), and the inoculated plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Colonies with unique morphologies were streaked for isolation on MRS agar. The isolates were screened for antimicrobial activity using a grid filter agar overlay method against Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 and Escherichia coli K-12 as foodborne pathogen surrogates and indicator bacteria (5). Isolates capable of inhibiting indicator bacteria were subjected to whole genome sequencing as follows: the selected isolates were cultured in MRS broth for 24 h at 30°C with shaking at 175 rpm, and the genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from 1.5 mL culture using a gDNA extraction kit (Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, Germantown, MD) as described by the manufacturer. The purity and concentration of the gDNA were measured using a spectrophotometer (NanoVue Plus, Biochrom USA, Holliston, MA). DNA libraries were prepared using a library preparation kit (Nextera DNA Flex; Illumina, Madison, WI), indexed with a library indexing kit (Nextera DNA CD Index; Illumina), and quantified using a fluorimeter (Qubit 4; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). The Illumina MiSeq platform (Food Microbiology Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) was used to sequence the genomes, producing paired-end raw reads (2 × 150 bp). FastQC software v0.12.1 (6) was used to assess the quality of the raw reads, and the adaptors were trimmed using the “Generate FASTQ analysis module” (Illumina). The reads were used for de novo genome assembly using the SPAdes v3.15.3 software (7). The coverage and raw reads of the assembled genomes ranged from 38.7 × to 132.3× and 916,982 to 2,118,388, respectively (Table 1). The assembled genomes were annotated using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.7 (8). Detailed genomic characteristics for each strain are listed in Table 1. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.
TABLE 1.
Genomic data of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains included in this study
| LAB strain | Strain information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GenBank accession number | BioSample accession number | Raw reads accession number | FastQC Phred score | Raw reads | Coverage | Contigs (#) | N50 | GC % | Total number of genes | |
| Lb. paracasei OSY-31 | JBDPLR000000000 | SAMN41462736 | SRR29540064 | 37 | 916,982 | 38.7× | 42 | 357,689 | 46.2 | 3,014 |
| L. lactis OSY-41 | JBDPLQ000000000 | SAMN41462737 | SRR29540063 | 37 | 2,118,388 | 110.6× | 115 | 98,282 | 35 | 2,706 |
| Le. mesenteroides OSY-54 | JBDPLP000000000 | SAMN41462738 | SRR29540062 | 38 | 2,111,676 | 132.3× | 42 | 252,855 | 37.7 | 2,319 |
| L. lactis OSY-92 | JBDPLO000000000 | SAMN41462739 | SRR29540061 | 37 | 1,330,992 | 74.0× | 135 | 81,303 | 35.1 | 2,701 |
| E. faecium OSY-102 | JBDPLN000000000 | SAMN41462740 | SRR29540060 | 37 | 1,087,070 | 59.1× | 109 | 63,257 | 38 | 2,724 |
| Le. falkenbergense OSY-112 | JBDPLM000000000 | SAMN41462741 | SRR29540059 | 38 | 1,353,054 | 101.7× | 109 | 43,259 | 39.1 | 2,020 |
The genomes of six LAB isolates were mined for biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) associated with antimicrobial production using the software antiSMASH 7.0 (9) and BAGEL4 (10). The genomes were found to contain multiple BGCs encoding ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides, polyketides, and class II bacteriocins. The isolates or their purified bacteriocins may have uses in the future for food preservation.
Contributor Information
Ahmed E. Yousef, Email: yousef.1@osu.edu.
David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The accession numbers for the genomes of the six strains are shown in Table 1. All genomes are available under BioProject accession number PRJNA1113687.
REFERENCES
- 1. Egan K, Field D, Rea MC, Ross RP, Hill C, Cotter PD. 2016. Bacteriocins: novel solutions to age old spore-related problems? Front Microbiol 7:461. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gharsallaoui A, Oulahal N, Joly C, Degraeve P. 2016. Nisin as a food preservative: part 1: physicochemical properties, antimicrobial activity, and main uses. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56:1262–1274. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.763765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhou H, Fang J, Tian Y, Lu XY. 2014. Mechanisms of nisin resistance in Gram-positive bacteria. Ann Microbiol 64:413–420. doi: 10.1007/s13213-013-0679-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML. 2001. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 71:1–20. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gerst MM, Yousef AE. 2018. Modified microassay for the isolation of antimicrobial-producing, spore-forming and nonspore-forming bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 124:1401–1410. doi: 10.1111/jam.13724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Andrews S. 2010. Babraham bioinformatics—FastQC. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 7. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Blin K, Shaw S, Medema MH, Weber T. 2024. The antiSMASH database version 4: additional genomes and BGCs, new sequence-based searches and more. Nucleic Acids Res 52:D586–D589. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2018. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The accession numbers for the genomes of the six strains are shown in Table 1. All genomes are available under BioProject accession number PRJNA1113687.
