Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2024 Oct 2;121(41):e2406358121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406358121

Autonomous multicolor bioluminescence imaging in bacteria, mammalian, and plant hosts

Subhan Hadi Kusuma a,b, Taishi Kakizuka b,c, Mitsuru Hattori b, Takeharu Nagai a,b,c,d,1
PMCID: PMC11474039  PMID: 39356665

Significance

Autonomous bioluminescence imaging has become an ideal technique for convenient and prolonged observation of cellular events without the addition of a substrate. However, the application of this technology is limited to blue light for bacterial luciferase and green light for fungal luciferase. Here, we report the development of five color variants of autonomous bioluminescence systems using bacterial luciferase. These color variants are expressed not only in bacteria but also in mammalian and plant hosts. Additionally, we extended the application including the visualization of dynamics of gene expression, and bioactive ion and molecule such as Ca2+and adenosine triphosphate (ATP).

Keywords: bioluminescence, bacterial luciferase, biosensor, bioimaging

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging has become a valuable tool in biological research, offering several advantages over fluorescence-based techniques, including the absence of phototoxicity and photobleaching, along with a higher signal-to-noise ratio. Common bioluminescence imaging methods often require the addition of an external chemical substrate (luciferin), which can result in a decrease in luminescence intensity over time and limit prolonged observations. Since the bacterial bioluminescence system is genetically encoded for luciferase-luciferin production, it enables autonomous bioluminescence (auto-bioluminescence) imaging. However, its application to multiple reporters is restricted due to a limited range of color variants. Here, we report five-color auto-bioluminescence system named Nano-lanternX (NLX), which can be expressed in bacterial, mammalian, and plant hosts, thereby enabling auto-bioluminescence in various living organisms. Utilizing spectral unmixing, we achieved the successful observation of multicolor auto-bioluminescence, enabling detailed single-cell imaging across both bacterial and mammalian cells. We have also expanded the applications of the NLX system, such as multiplexed auto-bioluminescence imaging for gene expression, protein localization, and dynamics of biomolecules within living mammalian cells.


Bioluminescence is the production of light through an enzymatic reaction involving the oxidation of a chemical substrate (luciferin) by an enzyme (luciferase) (1). The light produced by bioluminescent reactions is widely used to observe biological phenomena in living cells. To enable real-time imaging, continuous addition of luciferin is required. In some luciferin, such as Renilla luciferase’s luciferin (coelenterazine/CTZ), continuous addition of CTZ leads to increased CTZ’s autooxidation (2), lowering the signal-to-noise ratio and complicating long-term imaging. To overcome this issue, efforts have been made to produce luciferin-related genes to create autonomous bioluminescence (auto-bioluminescence) systems. Bacterial luciferases (Lux) and fungal luciferases (Luz) are the only well-known auto-bioluminescence systems, but Luz activity significantly decreases at high temperatures, specifically at 37 °C (3), limiting its usability in mammalian cell imaging. In contrast, Lux, particularly the variant from Photorhabdus luminescens, demonstrates thermostability at 37 °C (4), making it more suitable for such applications.

Lux is a heterodimeric luciferase composed of LuxA and LuxB subunits. It generates blue-green light (490 nm) by oxidizing reduced flavin mononucleotide (FMNH2, produced by flavin reductase/Frp) and long-chain fatty aldehyde (RCHO, produced by LuxCDE enzymes) to flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and to carboxylic acid (RCOOH), respectively (4). However, when observing multiple biological events, Lux-based probes cannot be used due to the lack of distinct color variants compared to commonly modified luciferases (5, 6). Consequently, there is considerable demand for Lux color variants to enable monitoring of diverse biological events. Previous color variants of Lux, with a small emission shifted (4 to 16 nm), typically arise from mutations occurring in the active site of luciferase (7) or through protein-binding interactions with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) (8, 9) and lumazine protein (LumP) (10, 11). However, these modifications can impact Lux activity, resulting in reduced luminescence (7) and altered thermostability (911).

To overcome these limitations, we adopted a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) strategy inspired by Nano-lantern development (5, 6, 12). This approach successfully produced multicolor variants of luciferase without compromising its luminescence and thermostability. Here, we introduce the multicolor auto-bioluminescent Lux for multiplexed auto-bioluminescence imaging. The multicolor Lux can be expressed in bacteria, and by utilizing codon-optimized Lux (co Lux) (13), it generates bright multicolor auto-bioluminescence in mammalian and plant hosts. These color variants enable the visualization of multiplex gene reporters and subcellular tags. Additionally, we have developed peptide-based indicators based on the multicolor Lux system.

Results

Development of Multicolor Lux.

To change Lux’s bioluminescence color, we adopted a BRET strategy using the YFP Venus (14) as the initial BRET acceptor protein (Fig. 1A). The effects of BRET with Venus, including modifications, were previously verified (15). Venus was fused to either the N- or C-terminus of the active subunit of Lux (LuxA) to achieve higher BRET efficiency (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). To compare the bioluminescence intensities of these fusion proteins without the influence of endogenous FMN/FMNH2 levels, we measured them in purified proteins rather than in cell systems (as previously reported) (15). For bioluminescence measurements, purified Lux and Venus fusions were added to FMN, decanal, and BNAH (16). Unfortunately, the intensities of these fusions were lower than those of wild-type (WT) Lux (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). We speculated that unstructured residues from the C-terminus of Venus might affect the activity or protein folding of LuxA. Consequently, deleting Venus’s C-terminus (VenusΔC10-LuxA) significantly improved the bioluminescence intensity compared to the WT (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). Referring to this structure, except mKOκ (17) (orange FP), which lacks unstructured residues at the C-terminus, the other truncated FPs, including mTurquoise2 (18) (cyan FP), sfGFP (19) (green FP), and mScarlet-I (20) (red FP), were fused with LuxA to serve as BRET acceptors. In the development of the red variant, we initially considered several red fluorescent proteins (FPs) due to the lower spectral overlap between Lux and common red FPs. Among the options, mScarlet-I (20) was chosen because of its higher BRET efficiency compared to CyOFP1 (21), mCherry-XL (22), and Scarlet (20) (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 and Table S1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Development and characterization of NLX. (A) Structural model of NLX, consisting of heterodimeric Lux, LuxA (blue), LuxB (cyan), and FP (yellow). (B) Schematic of the NLX series (Upper panel) and bioluminescence images of recombinant NLXs proteins (Bottom). (C) Bioluminescence spectra of NLXs proteins. The bioluminescence intensities were normalized to each peak intensity. (D) Bioluminescence intensities of NLXs. Comparison of bioluminescence intensities of NLXs proteins and Lux. Data are mean ± SD. n = 3, ***P < 0.001.

We also attempted to fuse FPs to the N- or C-terminus of LuxB to assess their suitability for LuxB fusion (15), with the goal of producing a multicolor Lux. However, even in this scenario, the BRET efficiency in the LuxA fusion remained higher than that in the LuxB fusion (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S1). We designated these LuxA-based variants as NLX (Nano-lantern based on Lux luciferase), comprising cyan NLX (CNLX) (λmaxEM=480 nm), green NLX (GNLX) (λmaxEM=520 nm), yellow NLX (YNLX) (λmaxEM=534 nm), orange NLX (ONLX) (λmaxEM=569 nm), and red NLX (RNLX) (λmaxEM=597 nm) (Fig. 1 B and C). The bioluminescence intensities of the purified NLXs exceeded those of the original Lux, although the specific increases varied (Fig. 1D). The fusion with FPs increased the luminescent quantum yield (QY), while the enzymatic parameters (kcat) of all NLXs remained similar to those of WT Lux (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B and Table S2). Notably, CNLX exhibited a sixfold higher QY than Lux (SI Appendix, Table S2).

In comparison with other non-autobioluminescent proteins, we compared the bioluminescent kinetics and intensity of purified YNL (yellow Nano-lantern, based on RLuc8-S257G), YeNL (yellow enhanced Nano-lantern, based on NanoLuc), Fluc (firefly luciferase), and YNLX proteins. The results showed that YNLX had a longer half-life (t1/2) compared to the other proteins tested (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). In contrast, YeNL exhibited a shorter half-life than the other proteins tested. Additionally, the luminescence intensity of YNLX was comparable to Fluc, although it was lower than that of YNL and YeNL (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B).

Autonomous Bioluminescence Imaging of NLXs.

We next evaluated coexpression of NLXs with luciferin biosynthesis genes, such as frp and luxCDE, to promote multicolor auto-bioluminescence in various living organisms. Initially, we examined multicolor auto-bioluminescence in bacterial cell hosts by transforming Escherichia coli with NLXs and the luxCDE operon, both driven by the T7 promoter. The bioluminescence emitted by recombinant E. coli expressing individual NLXs exhibited the expected colors, consistent with the bioluminescence observed in NLX-purified proteins (Fig. 2A). Additionally, we conducted multiplexed auto-bioluminescence imaging by mixing E. coli containing CNLX, YNLX, and RNLX plasmids (Fig. 2B). Recombinant E. coli demonstrated the capacity to be differentiated by color using specific optical filters and minimizing spectral noise with spectral unmixing algorithms (23). This study marks the first report of multicolor auto-bioluminescent bacteria that have a large spectral range from blue to red.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Multicolor auto-bioluminescence imaging with NLXs. (A) Auto-bioluminescence images of E. coli expressing all NLX variants. Bioluminescence images were acquired using a Sony α7s camera with 10 s of exposure time. (B) Auto-bioluminescence imaging of mixed E. coli expressing CNLX, YNLX, or RNLX. Pseudocolor images, scale bars, 2 µm:100× magnification with 8 min of exposure time. (C) Auto-bioluminescence imaging of mixed HEK293T cells expressing CNLX, YNLX, or RNLX. Pseudocolor images, scale bars, 50 µm:40× magnification with 60 s of exposure time. (D) Long-term auto-bioluminescence imaging of hiPSC-CMs expressing YNLX. Pseudocolor images, scale bars, 100 µm:20× magnification with 4 min exposure time. (E) Auto-bioluminescence of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves expressing NLXs genes and fungal bioluminescence pathway (FBP). Bioluminescence images were acquired using a Sony α7s camera with 60 s of exposure time.

To evaluate NLXs’ performance in mammalian cells, they were introduced into the human co Lux operon (co luxA, co luxB, co luxC, co luxD, co luxE, and co Frp) (13), replacing luxA in NLXs with co luxA. Since the original co lux expression necessitated cotransfecting six plasmids for each gene, we sought to minimize the number of plasmids by utilizing the 2A peptide to link proteins (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A). co luxD, co luxE, and co luxC were constructed as a tricistronic unit using two 2A peptides (co luxD-P2A-co luxE-T2A-co luxC) (DEC(2A)). In addition, co luxB was fused with co Frp using GGGGS (G4S) (24). As a result, the fusion of co luxB and co Frp, BF(G4S) increased the luminescence intensity in cells compared to that of co lux (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). In contrast, DEC(2A) did not enhance the intensity, which was also similarly reported previously (13), Therefore, by introducing the Kozak sequence (25) downstream of the 2A peptide, DEC(KZK) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A), the luminescence intensity was improved (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). The optimized co lux operon-expressing plasmids, BF(G4S) and DEC(KZK), were cotransfected with NLXs plasmids into HEK293T cells. The luminescence of the introduced NLXs was confirmed by microscopy using an EM-CCD camera for single-cell imaging. It was also shown that each luminescence color could be separated using specific optical filters (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Subsequently, we performed multiplex auto-bioluminescence imaging by mixing HEK293T cells expressing CNLX, YNLX, and RNLX (Fig. 2C). As with the mixed E. coli results, the cells could be distinguished by their respective wavelengths using spectral unmixing. We also conducted multiplex auto-bioluminescence imaging of subcellular structures by fusing RNLX with histones (H2B-RNLX) and YNLX with the plasma membrane (Lyn-YNLX), expressing them in HEK293T cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). The luminescence signals from H2B-RNLX and Lyn-YNLX were separated by optical filtering and successfully showed correct localization.

In comparison, we attempted to check the luminescence dynamic of NIH3T3 cell transiently expressing YeNL and YNLX. YeNL was localized in both the cytosol and nucleus, while YNLX was only observed in the cytosol due to its larger size. The transfection efficiency of YNLX was lower than YeNL due to the need for three plasmids (YNLX, BF(G4S), and DEC(KZK)) to produce auto-bioluminescence (SI Appendix, Fig. S8 and Movie S1). YeNL showed higher luminescence after the addition of furimazine, but it decreased completely at 45 min and showed no luminescence at 18 h. In contrast, YNLX showed stable luminescence activity even at 18 h of observation (SI Appendix, Fig. S8).

We subsequently checked the ability of YNLX to promote long-term imaging in mammalian cells. We used human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) to transiently express YNLX. Mature cardiomyocytes are nondividing cells, preventing the loss of transfected DNA due to dilution of DNA by cell division (26). Thus, hiPSC-CMs are suitable for the expression of the NLX plasmid without genome integration (27). We successfully conducted continuous time-lapse auto-bioluminescence imaging of hiPSC-CMs expressing YNLX over one wk. demonstrating sustained auto-bioluminescence and beating activity (Fig. 2D, and Movies S2 and S3). This establishes YNLX as highly suitable for bioluminescence imaging in cardiac disease modeling, a critical area where hiPSC-CMs are indispensable.

We discovered that these optimized constructs could be transiently expressed in plant hosts without being optimized for plant codon usage. As a result of introducing the co lux operon constructs into the leaves of N. benthamiana, auto-bioluminescence from the leaves was successfully detected (Fig. 2E and SI Appendix, Fig. S9A). It also showed that NLXs produced luminescence intensities comparable to those of FBP (28) (SI Appendix, Fig. S9B). No significant differences were observed in the gene expression levels of NLXs and nnLuz (SI Appendix, Fig. S9C). Compared to nnLuz, which generates a single color, our NLXs, capable of producing multicolor auto-bioluminescence, serve as versatile reporter genes for plant research. Thus, the NLX-based Lux operon demonstrated multiplex auto-bioluminescence observations in various living organisms.

Application of NLXs as Gene Expression Reporters.

Luciferase-based probes such as Renilla luciferase (Rluc) and firefly luciferase (Fluc) (29) have been widely used as reporter genes. However, luciferase-based probes still rely on luciferin addition. Thus, the ability to monitor the dynamics of reporter genes at the single-cell level for long-term observation without a decrease in luminescence intensity is limited. To evaluate whether our NLXs can also be used in reporter gene assays, we carried out a Wnt-reporter assay utilizing the Wnt-responsive promoter 7× TCF(5). The addition of LiCl as an agonist chemical to the Wnt protein resulted in luminescence from the cell-encoded 7× TCF-YNLX plasmid (Fig. 3A). We also checked whether the addition of LiCl or Wnt-activation can affect the luminescence intensity of cells expressing Lux systems (co lux). No significant changes in auto-bioluminescence intensity were observed after the addition of LiCl compared to cells expressing the Wnt-responsive promoter 7× TCF (7× TCF-YNLX) (Fig. 3B). To track the dynamics of Wnt responsiveness at the single-cell level upon the addition of LiCl, we continued to express 7× TCF-YNLX in HEK293T cells for 16 h (SI Appendix, Fig. S10A). Bioluminescence was observed 4 h into the observation period and continued to be expressed (SI Appendix, Fig. S10A and Movie S4). Thus, the reporter gene based on YNLX was successfully used to monitor the dynamics of the reporter gene for long-term imaging.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Applications of NLXs in gene expression. Reporter assay for Wnt gene expression by YNLX. Auto-bioluminescence imaging (A) and auto-bioluminescence intensity (B) of HEK293T cells expressing co lux and 7× TCF-YNLX were measured at 16 h with or without the addition of 40 mM LiCl. Pseudocolor images, scale bars, 100 µm:20× magnification with 2 min exposure time. RLU is the relative light unit. Data are mean ± SD. n = 3, ***P <0.001. (C) Schematic of the multiplex assay. HEK293T cells transiently transfected with 7× TCF-YNLX, CMV-RNLX, and auto-bioluminescent parts (CMV-BF(G4S) and CMV-DEC(KZK)) plasmids were treated with LiCl to induce Wnt expression. (D) Auto-bioluminescence intensities of 7× TCF-YNLX upon the addition of various concentrations of LiCl. Bioluminescence intensities were measured 16 h after the addition of various concentrations of LiCl. Data are mean ± SD. n = 3, ***P <0.001

We next demonstrated this reporter’s utility in transient transfection for high-throughput screening (HTS) by cotransfecting CMV-RNLX and 7× TCF-YNLX in HEK293T cells, producing normalized data accounting for varying transfection efficiencies (Fig. 3 C and D). Unlike previous reporter assays utilizing Lux (30), which relied on Fluc or Rluc to normalize luminescence intensity and required cell lysis in downstream processes, our NLX system eliminates the need for additional luciferases and the requirement for cell lysis. This feature enhances convenience and cost-effectiveness, making it particularly advantageous for HTS applications.

Application of NLXs as a Peptide-Based Indicator for Ions and Molecules.

We expanded the application of Lux luciferase by developing a peptide-ligand-based indicator. To this end, we employed a ratiometric indicator strategy (Fig. 4A) to minimize signal drift due to changes in cell shape, focus drift, or variations in substrate consumption from auto-bioluminescence mechanisms. Consequently, we developed BRET-based indicators to detect crucial ligands such as calcium and ATP in living organisms. To develop a calcium indicator based on Lux, we fused the Ca2+-sensitive troponin-C peptide (TnC) (31) into the site between Venus and LuxA in the YNLX plasmid. First, we screened Venus variants and circularly permutated Venus variants (32) to achieve the highest dynamic range upon Ca2+ addition (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Among them, cp173Venus-TnC-LuxA (YNLX (Ca2+)) showed the largest dynamic range (181%) compared with the other variants (Fig. 4B). The Kd value for Ca2+ in this construct was 570 nM and the Hill coefficient was 1.02 (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, we observed Ca2+ changes after the addition of ionomycin and 10 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 4D). Although the dynamic range of YNLX (Ca2+) was lower than our prior Nano-lantern (Ca2+) (5) and GeNL(Ca2+) (6), which achieved dynamic ranges of approximately 300% and 500%, respectively, it still outperformed ratiometric indicators such as BRAC (33), which has a dynamic range of only 60%. YNLX (Ca2+) offered a dynamic range of 181% and a Kd value comparable to that of both Nano-lantern (Ca2+) and GeNL (Ca2+) at 620 and 480 nM, respectively (5, 6), demonstrating its functionality and comparability to existing non-autobioluminescent sensors (Fig. 4 AC).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Applications of NLXs as peptide-based sensors. (A) Schematics of peptide-based sensor based on NLXs with ratiometric strategy. (B) Emission spectra of YNLX (Ca2+) with or without Ca2+. Bioluminescence intensities were normalized by the isoemission point. (C) Ca2+ titration curve of YNLX (Ca2+). The bioluminescence ratio was calculated from the peaks at 490 and 530 nm. (D) Auto-bioluminescence imaging of YNLX (Ca2+). BRET ratio (pseudocolor images) of HEK293T cells expressing YNLX (Ca2+) before and after addition of 10 µM ionomycin and 10 mM CaCl2. Scale bars, 50 µm: 40× magnification with 2 min of exposure time. (E) Emission spectra of YNLX (ATP) with and without ATP. (F) ATP titration curve of YNLX(ATP). The bioluminescence ratio was calculated from the peaks at 490 and 530 nm. (G) Auto-bioluminescence imaging of YNLX (ATP). BRET ratio (pseudocolor images) of HEK293T cells expressing YNLX (Ca2+) before and after the addition of an ATP inhibitor (20 µg/mL oligomycin A and 20 mM 2-deoxyglucose). Scale bars, 50 µm: 40× magnification with 3 min exposure time.

To develop an ATP indicator based on Lux, we fused the ε subunit (34) into the site between Venus and LuxA in YNLX, resulting in Venus-ε subunit-LuxA (YNLX (ATP)). YNLX (ATP) showed elevated BRET efficiency in the presence of ATP, with the Kd value for ATP of this construct being 2.3 mM (Fig. 4 E and F). YNLX (ATP) was designed as a low-affinity ATP sensor, making it is suitable for measuring physiological ATP level (1 to 5 mM) (35). Its Kd value was also comparable to that of previous non-auto-bioluminescent ATP indicators such as BTeam, which has a Kd value of 1.7 mM (36). We continued to evaluate the functionality of YNLX (ATP) in mammalian cell experiments. As a result, we successfully imaged intracellular ATP depletion upon addition of an inhibitor of ATP production (oligomycin and 2-deoxyglucose) (Fig. 4G and SI Appendix, Fig. S12). Therefore, YNLX was successfully applied as an ATP biosensor using a ratiometric strategy.

Discussion

Autonomous bioluminescence technology enables time-lapse imaging of biological processes without the need for luciferin. This technology eliminates the issue of luminescence decay and is cost-effective for HTS, making it an efficient option for luminescence imaging. However, the current state of auto-bioluminescent technology is primarily limited to observing individual biological phenomena, which hampers its utility for multiplexed autonomous imaging. Through the optimization of the LuxA position and BRET donor pairs, we successfully developed five color variants of auto-bioluminescence based on Lux luciferase. These color variants not only shifted the emission spectrum but also increased the luminescence intensity compared to that of the WT Lux. The cyan version, CNLX, is a brighter variant, potentially up to ten times brighter than the WT Lux, attributed to changes in QY influenced by the BRET phenomenon.

The successful imaging of auto-bioluminescence NLX in cellular systems is closely linked to the optimal pathways of auto-bioluminescent proteins within the cell. In bacterial expression systems, endogenous flavin reductase (Fre) (37) is constitutively expressed, making the addition of the Frp gene unnecessary in this host. However, in mammalian cells, Frp is essential for achieving high auto-bioluminescence (13). Nonetheless, FMNH2, a substrate that is produced by Frp, undergoes rapid oxidation to FMN in the presence of dissolved oxygen in cell systems (38). To address this, we utilized a LuxB-Frp fusion (BF(G4S)) to facilitate the direct transfer of FMNH2 to LuxA, thereby enhancing luminescence intensity in mammalian hosts (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).

The robustness of NLXs as multicolor auto-bioluminescent probes requires consideration of several factors, such as the expression level from transient expression. Despite optimizing three plasmids (NLX, BF(G4S), and DEC(KZK)) in mammalian cells to enhance transfection efficiency, these levels were not superior to those observed with single plasmid transfection, as we demonstrated in YeNL expression (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Posttransfection observations did not indicate significant impacts on cell viability either immediately after 24 h in a CO2 incubator or during a wk microscopic imaging, similar to previous studies (13, 39, 40). Other critical factors affecting autoluminescence intensity include optimal temperature (37 °C), cell condition, medium composition (free of nutrient deprivation, contamination, or toxic compounds), and the choice of promoter strength. To address emission spectral variations in NLXs, techniques like optical filtering, spectral unmixing and the use of CMOS-based cameras or phasor analysis (41) for bioluminescence imaging offer promising solutions for enhancing multiplexing capabilities.

The use of NLXs has enabled us to perform multiplex auto-bioluminescent imaging, overcoming the limitations of WT Lux and other auto-bioluminescent applications such as fungal luciferase (Luz). A notable feature of NLXs is their ability to facilitate auto-bioluminescence in various organisms, including bacterial, mammalian, and plant hosts. In comparison, the Luz system (FBP) is capable of fully establishing auto-bioluminescence in plant hosts. However, in the other hosts such as mammalian cells, this capability is limited due to inefficiencies in synthesizing caffeic acid as a luciferin precursor in their basal metabolic pathway (3). Additionally, our system contradicts the conventional belief that Lux causes low light intensity in the plant host (42). In fact, our findings revealed that we were able to grow transiently multicolor bright plants with light intensity comparable to FBP. This makes our system an ideal tool for plant research. Furthermore, we have expanded auto-bioluminescent applications, traditionally limited to single sensors, by developing subcellular tags, multiple gene assays, and a proof-of-concept peptide-based sensor for auto-bioluminescent Ca2+ and ATP imaging in longer observations. We are also focused on the importance of red-shifted emission of RNLX for imaging animal tissues. This is crucial because it allows for distinction from the signal absorption of deep tissues, particularly from hemoglobin (43, 44). In addition, the yellow-shifted emission of YNLX is essential for plant research because of its absorption spectrum of chlorophyll (45). Furthermore, the improvement in the enzymatic catalytic efficiency of LuxA through an increase in the kcat value has the potential to significantly elevate its luminescence intensity, bringing it to a level comparable to that of eNL (6). Overall, we believe that our NLXs could be a “game-changing” development in bioluminescent technology, offering multipurpose applications in the future.

Materials and Methods

SI Appendix, SI Materials and Methods provided the details of the materials and methods used in this study, including of plasmid generation, luminescent characterization, cell culture, transient expression in plant leaves, and quantitative analysis of gene expression. In brief, NLXs and its modified genes were cloned into pRSETB, pCDNA3.1(+), and pRI201-AN for bacterial, mammalian, and plant expression, respectively. Bioluminescence imaging was performed with an inverted microscope based on the IXploreTM Live for Luminescence (EVIDENT) system equipped with EM-CCD camera.

Nucleotide sequences of all constructs in this study are available in SI Appendix, Table S3.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Movie S1.

Comparison in bioluminescence imaging of YeNL and YNLX. Time-lapse bioluminescence imaging of NIH3T3 cell expressing YeNL and YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (722.2KB, avi)
Movie S2.

Long-term time-lapse auto-bioluminescence imaging of hiPSC-CMs expressing YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (681.8KB, avi)
Movie S3.

Brightfield imaging of beating hiPSC-CMs before and 7-days after expressing YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (4.2MB, avi)
Movie S4.

Time-lapse imaging of 7×TCF-YNLX. Time lapse imaging of HEK293T cells expressing 7×TCF-YNLX upon the addition of 40 mM LiCl. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Download video file (647.6KB, mov)

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Stefan W. Hell for providing the co lux plasmids. We thank Dr. Kenji Osabe for the advice on luminescent protein characterization. This work was partly supported by grants from the Japan Science Technology Agency Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JST CREST) (No. JPMJCR20H9 to T.N.), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (No. 18H05410 to T.N.), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 22H00409 to T.N.), New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (No. 22681865 to T.N), and MEXT scholarship to S.H.K.

Author contributions

S.H.K. and T.N. designed research; S.H.K. performed research; T.K. performed the cardiomyocyte cell culture; S.H.K., M.H., and T.N. analyzed data; and S.H.K. and T.N. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have patent application fillings to disclose (JP2023-179446).

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. N.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Shimomura O., Bioluminescence (World Scientific, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao H., et al. , Characterization of coelenterazine analogs for measurements of Renilla luciferase activity in live cells and living animals. Mol. Imaging 3, 43–54 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kotlobay A. A., et al. , Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 12728–12732 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meighen E. A., Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Microbiol. Rev. 55, 123–142 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takai A., et al. , Expanded palette of nano-lanterns for real-time multicolor luminescence imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 4352–4356 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Suzuki K., et al. , Five colour variants of bright luminescent protein for real-time multicolour bioimaging. Nat. Commun. 7, 13718 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin L.Y.-C., Szittner R., Friedman R., Meighen E. A., Changes in the kinetics and emission spectrum on mutation of the chromophore-binding platform in Vibrio harveyi luciferase. Biochemistry 43, 3183–3194 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Daubner S. C., Astorga A. M., Leisman G. B., Baldwin T. O., Yellow light emission of Vibrio fischeri strain Y-1: Purification and characterization of the energy-accepting yellow fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 8912–8916 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petushkov V. N., Gibson B. G., Lee J., Direct measurement of excitation transfer in the protein complex of bacterial luciferase hydroxyflavin and the associated yellow fluorescence proteins from Vibrio fischeri Y1. Biochemistry 35, 8413–8418 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brodl E., Winkler A., Macheroux P., Molecular mechanisms of bacterial bioluminescence. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 16, 551–564 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sato Y., et al. , Crystal structures of the lumazine protein from Photobacterium kishitanii in complexes with the authentic chromophore, 6,7-dimethyl- 8-(1′-D-ribityl) lumazine, and its analogues, riboflavin and flavin mononucleotide, at high resolution. J. Bacteriol. 192, 127–133 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saito K., et al. , Luminescent proteins for high-speed single-cell and whole-body imaging. Nat. Commun. 3, 1262 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gregor C., et al. , Autonomous bioluminescence imaging of single mammalian cells with the bacterial bioluminescence system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 26491–26496 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nagai T., et al. , A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 87–90 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaku T., Sugiura K., Entani T., Osabe K., Nagai T., Enhanced brightness of bacterial luciferase by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Sci. Rep. 11, 14994 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Phonbuppha J., et al. , A Minimized chemoenzymatic cascade for bacterial luciferase in bioreporter applications. Chem. BioChem 21, 2073–2079 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsutsui H., Karasawa S., Okamura Y., Miyawaki A., Improving membrane voltage measurements using FRET with new fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 5, 683–685 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Goedhart J., et al. , Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%. Nat. Commun. 3, 751 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pédelacq J.-D., Cabantous S., Tran T., Terwilliger T. C., Waldo G. S., Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 79–88 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bindels D. S., et al. , mScarlet: A bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53–56 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chu J., et al. , A bright cyan-excitable orange fluorescent protein facilitates dual-emission microscopy and enhances bioluminescence imaging in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 760–767 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mukherjee S., Manna P., Douglas N., Chapagain P. P., Jimenez R., Conformational dynamics of mcherry variants: A link between side-chain motions and fluorescence brightness. J. Phys. Chem. B. 127, 52–61 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gammon S. T., Leevy W. M., Gross S., Gokel G. W., Piwnica-Worms D., Spectral unmixing of multicolored bioluminescence emitted from heterogeneous biological sources. Anal. Chem. 78, 1520–1527 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jawanda N., Ahmed K., Tu S.-C., Vibrio harveyi flavin reductase−luciferase fusion protein mimics a single-component bifunctional monooxygenase. Biochemistry 47, 368–377 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Y., et al. , Optimization of a 2A self-cleaving peptide-based multigene expression system for efficient expression of upstream and downstream genes in silkworm. Mol. Genet. Genomics 294, 849–859 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cervera L., et al. , Generation of HIV-1 Gag VLPs by transient transfection of HEK 293 suspension cell cultures using an optimized animal-derived component free medium. J. Biotechnol. 166, 152–165 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bodbin S. E., Denning C., Mosqueira D., Transfection of hpPSC-cardiomyocytes using ViaFectTM transfection reagent. Methods Protoc. 3, 57 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khakhar A., et al. , Building customizable auto-luminescent luciferase-based reporters in plants. eLife 9, e52786 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Takai A., et al. , Anterior neural development requires Del1, a matrix-associated protein that attenuates canonical Wnt signaling via the Ror2 pathway. Development 137, 3293–3302 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Phonbuppha J., Tinikul R., Ohmiya Y., Chaiyen P., High sensitivity and low-cost flavin luciferase (FLUXVc)-based reporter gene for mammalian cell expression. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 104639 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thestrup T., et al. , Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes. Nat. Methods 11, 175–182 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nagai T., Yamada S., Tominaga T., Ichikawa M., Miyawaki A., Expanded dynamic range of fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ by circularly permuted yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10554–10559 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Saito K., et al. , Auto-luminescent genetically-encoded ratiometric indicator for real-time Ca2+ imaging at the single cell level. PLoS ONE 5, e9935 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Imamura H., et al. , Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based genetically encoded indicators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 15651–15656 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yaginuma H., et al. , Diversity in ATP concentrations in a single bacterial cell population revealed by quantitative single-cell imaging. Sci. Rep. 4, 6522 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoshida T., Kakizuka A., Imamura H., BTeam, a novel BRET-based biosensor for the accurate quantification of ATP concentration within living cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 39618 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Akerboom J., et al. , Crystal structures of the GCaMP calcium sensor reveal the mechanism of fluorescence signal change and aid rational design. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 6455–6464 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee J., Müller F., Visser A. J. W. G., The sensitized bioluminescence mechanism of bacterial luciferase. Photochem. Photobiol. 95, 679–704 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Close D. M., et al. , Autonomous bioluminescent expression of the bacterial luciferase gene cassette (lux) in a mammalian cell line. PLoS ONE 5, e12441 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu T., Ripp S., Sayler G. S., Close D. M., Expression of a humanized viral 2A-Mediated lux operon efficiently generates autonomous bioluminescence in human cells. PLoS ONE 9, e96347 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yao Z., et al. , Multiplexed bioluminescence microscopy via phasor analysis. Nat. Methods 19, 893–898 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krichevsky A., Meyers B., Vainstein A., Maliga P., Citovsky V., Autoluminescent plants. PLoS ONE 5, e15461 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dragulescu-Andrasi A., Chan C. T., De A., Massoud T. F., Gambhir S. S., Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) imaging of protein–protein interactions within deep tissues of living subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12060–12065 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chu J., et al. , Non-invasive intravital imaging of cellular differentiation with a bright red-excitable fluorescent protein. Nat. Methods 11, 572–578 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Furuhata Y., Sakai A., Murakami T., Nagasaki A., Kato Y., Bioluminescent imaging of Arabidopsis thaliana using an enhanced nano-lantern luminescence reporter system. PLoS ONE 15, e0227477 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Movie S1.

Comparison in bioluminescence imaging of YeNL and YNLX. Time-lapse bioluminescence imaging of NIH3T3 cell expressing YeNL and YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (722.2KB, avi)
Movie S2.

Long-term time-lapse auto-bioluminescence imaging of hiPSC-CMs expressing YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (681.8KB, avi)
Movie S3.

Brightfield imaging of beating hiPSC-CMs before and 7-days after expressing YNLX. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Download video file (4.2MB, avi)
Movie S4.

Time-lapse imaging of 7×TCF-YNLX. Time lapse imaging of HEK293T cells expressing 7×TCF-YNLX upon the addition of 40 mM LiCl. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Download video file (647.6KB, mov)

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES