Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2024 May 15;9:257. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21552.1

The genome sequence of purple glasswort, Salicornia ramosissima Woods (Amaranthaceae)

Sahr Mian 1, Maarten J M Christenhusz 1,2, Ilia J Leitch 1, Andrew R Leitch 3; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Genome Acquisition Lab; Plant Genome Sizing collective; Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective; Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team; Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations; Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team; Tree of Life Core Informatics collective; Darwin Tree of Life Consortiuma
PMCID: PMC11474152  PMID: 39411459

Abstract

We present a genome assembly from an individual Salicornia ramosissima (purple glasswort; Tracheophyta; Magnoliopsida; Caryophyllales; Chenopodiaceae). The genome sequence is 529.1 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 9 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial and plastid genome assemblies have lengths of 328.55 kilobases and 153.3 kilobases in length, respectively.

Keywords: Salicornia ramosissima, purple glasswort, genome sequence, chromosomal, Caryophyllales

Species taxonomy

Eukaryota; Viridiplantae; Streptophyta; Streptophytina; Embryophyta; Tracheophyta; Euphyllophyta; Spermatophyta; Magnoliopsida; Mesangiospermae; eudicotyledons; Gunneridae; Pentapetalae; Caryophyllales; Chenopodiaceae; Salicornioideae; Salicornia; Salicornia subgen. Salicornia; Salicornia ramosissima Woods (NCBI:txid267548).

Background

Glasswort or marsh samphire of the genus Salicornia L. is a salt-loving (halophytic) annual succulent, found along the coasts of most of the world, as well as inland in salt-flats and along salt lakes. In Britain and Ireland, it is typically found in salt marshes and along salty creeks and coastal mudflats. The genus is widely polymorphic, making the species difficult to distinguish ( Valdés & Castroviejo, 1990). Three main groups or aggregates can be distinguished in the UK, characterised by the numbers and sizes of flowers per group, and the shape and size of fertile segments and seeds ( Lopes et al., 2023; Stace et al., 2019).

Salicornia ramosissima belongs to the S. europaea L. aggregate, which may be recognised by groups of three flowers, short anthers (≤ 0.5 mm) on a single stamen, the central flowers much larger than the two laterals and fertile segments convex with a scarious border. It is called purple glasswort, because the plants appear tinged with reddish-purple in the sun when the season progresses ( Figure 1). It is restricted to Atlantic and North Sea coasts of Europe.

Figure 1. Photograph of the Salicornia ramosissima (dcSalRamo1) specimen used for genome sequencing.

Figure 1.

Like other halophytes, Salicornia ramosissima has high rates of mineral retention from the environment, and is rich in sodium and potassium ( Correia et al., 2022). This probably contributed to the use of the species in glass and soap making during the 16 th century and gave rise to the origin of one of its common names - glasswort. For example, burning the plant tissue converted the sodium into soda ash (i.e., sodium carbonate), which was a key ingredient for glassmaking as it reduced the furnace temperature required to melt silica.

The origin of its other common name ‘samphire’ probably derives from St Peter, patron saint of fishermen ( Onions, 1966). However, it is noted that this common name is broadly used as a term for marine plants with succulent, edible juicy stems and leaves. Thus, apart from Salicornia and the related Sarcocornia A. J. Scott, ‘samphire’ has also been used to refer to the unrelated Crithmum maritimum L. (Apiaceae) commonly known as rock samphire and Limbarda crithmoides (L.) Dumort. (Asteraceae) which is often referred to as the golden samphire.

Salicornia ramosissima has been widely used for food, either fresh or pickled, often accompanying fish dishes. In recent years it has become popular in gourmet cuisine. Given its preference for salty, nutrient-rich environments, the nutritional value of the plant has been researched, and it is being investigated as a potential food source in famine situations ( Lopes et al., 2023). Success with marsh samphire cultivation could add a new dimension to agriculture, helping to meet the needs of people and livestock in some of the driest, saltiest regions of the globe. The plant can be used as animal fodder and seeds can be harvested for high quality vegetable oil ( Clark, 1994). As the plant may be irrigated with seawater, the cultivation of Salicornia is especially attractive in areas where freshwater availability is limited.

There has been some debate over the chromosome number for this species as both diploids with 2n = 18 and tetraploids with 2n = 36 have been reported from British-collected material (e.g. Dalby, 1962; Hambler, 1954; Henniges et al., 2022; Maude, 1939). While it has been suggested that this may be due to the challenges of distinguishing S. ramoisissima from the broader S. europaea aggregate, Dalby (1962) confirmed the presence of that both diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of S. ramoisissima in material collected from Britain.

The chromosome-level genome sequence presented here is the first for any species in the genus, but as additional species are sequenced, this will help in understanding the taxonomic diversity of the genus and help tease apart the species in the different species aggregates. In addition, the genome joins whole genome assemblies already publicly available for other halophytes in the related genus Suaeda (e.g. S. aralocaspica; Wang et al., 2019) and S. glauca; Cheng et al., 2023). As temperatures and sea levels continue to rise, the need for crops that can grow where little else will and can withstand drought and an increasingly salinised and degraded environment will undoubtedly increase ( Lopes et al., 2023). This genome will also help us to understand salt tolerance in S. ramosissima and related species.

Genome sequence report

The genome was sequenced from a specimen of Salicornia ramosissima ( Figure 1) collected from Widewater Lagoon, Shoreham, West Sussex, UK (50.82, –0.30). Using flow cytometry, the genome size (1C-value) was estimated to be 0.65 pg, equivalent to 630.8 Mb/1C. A total of 77-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 10 missing joins or mis-joins, reducing the scaffold number by 9.09%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 3.18%.

The final assembly has a total length of 529.1 Mb in 18 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 59.1 Mb ( Table 1). The snail plot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (99.77%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 9 chromosomal-level scaffolds. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial and plastid genomes were also assembled and can be found as contigs within the multifasta file of the genome submission.

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.1: metrics.

Figure 2.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 529,593,104 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (64,877,190 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (59,065,583 and 51,935,755 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the eudicots_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/dcSalRamo1_1/dataset/dcSalRamo1_1/snail.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.

Figure 3.

Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/dcSalRamo1_1/dataset/dcSalRamo1_1/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.

Figure 4.

The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/dcSalRamo1_1/dataset/dcSalRamo1_1/cumulative.

Figure 5. Genome assembly of Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.1: Hi-C contact map of the dcSalRamo1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.

Figure 5.

Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=ah548Z1nSyeXnOhbeNhmMw.

Table 1. Genome data for Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.1.

Project accession data
Assembly identifier dcSalRamo1.1
Species Salicornia ramosissima
Specimen dcSalRamo1
NCBI taxonomy ID 267548
BioProject PRJEB61611
BioSample ID SAMEA10369832
Isolate information dcSalRamo1: leaf (DNA and Hi-C sequencing)
Assembly metrics * Benchmark
Consensus quality (QV) 71.4 ≥ 50
k-mer completeness 100.0% ≥ 95%
BUSCO ** C:96.5%[S:94.6%,D:1.9%],
F:0.4%,M:3.1%,n:2,326
C ≥ 95%
Percentage of assembly
mapped to chromosomes
99.77% ≥ 95%
Sex chromosomes None localised homologous pairs
Organelles Mitochondrial genome: 328.55 kb
Plastid genome: 153.3 kb
complete single alleles
Raw data accessions
PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II ERR11279088, ERR11279087
Hi-C Illumina ERR11271531
Genome assembly
Assembly accession GCA_951394345.1
Accession of alternate haplotype GCA_951394335.1
Span (Mb) 529.1
Number of contigs 143
Contig N50 length (Mb) 6.6
Number of scaffolds 18
Scaffold N50 length (Mb) 59.1
Longest scaffold (Mb) 64.88

* Assembly metric benchmarks are adapted from column VGP-2020 of “Table 1: Proposed standards and metrics for defining genome assembly quality” from ( Rhie et al., 2021).

** BUSCO scores based on the eudicots_odb10 BUSCO set using version 5.3.2. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/dcSalRamo1_1/dataset/dcSalRamo1_1/busco.

Table 2. Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Salicornia ramosissima, dcSalRamo1.

INSDC
accession
Chromosome Length
(Mb)
GC%
OX596232.1 1 64.88 34.5
OX596233.1 2 64.87 34.5
OX596234.1 3 60.85 35.0
OX596235.1 4 59.9 35.0
OX596236.1 5 59.07 35.0
OX596237.1 6 57.34 34.5
OX596238.1 7 56.26 35.0
OX596239.1 8 53.29 34.5
OX596240.1 9 51.94 34.5
OX596241.1 MT 0.33 44.0
OX596242.1 Pltd 0.15 36.0

The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 71.4 with k-mer completeness of 100.0%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 96.5% (single = 94.6%, duplicated = 1.9%), using the eudicots_odb10 reference set ( n = 2,326).

Metadata for specimens, barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/267548.

Methods

Sample acquisition, genome size estimation and nucleic acid extraction

A specimen of Salicornia ramosissima (specimen ID KDTOL10391, ToLID dcSalRamo1) was collected from Widewater Lagoon, Shoreham, West Sussex, UK (latitude 50.82, longitude –0.30) on 2021-09-07. The specimen was collected by Sahr Mian, Maarten Christenhusz, Ilia Leitch from the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. RBG Kew) and Andrew Leitch (from Queen Mary University of London), identified by Maarten Christenhusz and then frozen at –80 °C. The herbarium voucher associated with the sequenced plant is Christenhusz no. 9300 and is deposited in the herbarium of RBG Kew (K) (K001400816).

The genome size was estimated by flow cytometry using the fluorochrome propidium iodide and following the ‘one-step’ method as outlined in Pellicer et al. (2021). Specifically for this species, the General Purpose Buffer (GPB) supplemented with 3% PVP and 0.08% (v/v) beta-mercaptoethanol was used for isolation of nuclei ( Loureiro et al., 2007), and the internal calibration standard was Petroselinum crispum ‘Champion Moss Curled’ with an assumed 1C-value of 2,200 Mb ( Obermayer et al., 2002).

The workflow for high molecular weight (HMW) DNA extraction at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) includes a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation, DNA extraction, fragmentation, and clean-up. In sample preparation, the dcSalRamo1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice ( Jay et al., 2023). For sample homogenisation, leaf tissue was cryogenically disrupted using the Covaris cryoPREP ® Automated Dry Pulverizer ( Narváez-Gómez et al., 2023). HMW DNA was extracted using the Automated Plant MagAttract v2 protocol ( Todorovic et al., 2023a). HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30 ( Todorovic et al., 2023b). Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation ( Strickland et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs a 1.8X ratio of AMPure PB beads to sample to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

Protocols developed by the WSI Tree of Life core laboratory are publicly available on protocols.io ( Denton et al., 2023).

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on a Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from leaf tissue of dcSalRamo1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.

Genome assembly, curation and evaluation

Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and PretextView ( Harry, 2022). The organelle genomes were assembled using OATK ( Zhou, 2023).

A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.

Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.

Table 3. Software tools: versions and sources.

Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.

Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:

•      Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material

•      Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)

Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and thank the members of ‘World of Widewater’, the ‘Widewater Lagoon LNR Management Committee’, 'The Friends of Shoreham Beach LNR' and the 'Lancing Parish Council' for their enthusiasm and help with the collection of this species.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute [206194, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/206194>https://doi.org/10.35802/206194</a>] and the Darwin Tree of Life Discretionary Award [218328,<a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/218328>https://doi.org/10.35802/218328 </a>].

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Data availability

European Nucleotide Archive: Salicornia ramosissima. Accession number PRJEB61611; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB61611 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2023). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Salicornia ramosissima genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.

Author information

Members of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4786680.

Members of the Plant Genome Sizing collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7994306.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4893703.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066175.

Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10043364.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066637.

Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013541.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.

References

  1. Abdennur N, Mirny LA: Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Challis R, Richards E, Rajan J, et al. : BlobToolKit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, et al. : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng Y, Sun J, Jiang M, et al. : Chromosome-scale genome sequence of Suaeda glauca sheds light on salt stress tolerance in halophytes. Hortic Res. 2023;10(9): uhad161. 10.1093/hr/uhad161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark A: Samphire, from sea to shining seed. Saudi Aramco World. 1994;45(6):2–9. [Accessed 17 January 2024]. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  6. Correia A, Silva AM, Moreira MM, et al. : Salicornia ramosissima: a new green cosmetic ingredient with promising skin effects. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(12): 2449. 10.3390/antiox11122449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalby DH: Chromosome number, morphology and breeding behaviour in the British salicorniae. Watsonia. 1962;5(3):150–162. [Accessed 11 April 2024]. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  8. Denton A, Yatsenko H, Jay J, et al. : Sanger Tree of Life wet laboratory protocol collection v.1. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5xxy6g1b/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, et al. : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guan D, McCarthy SA, Wood J, et al. : Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(9):2896–2898. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hambler DJ: Chromosome numbers in British Salicornia. Nature. 1954;173(4403):547. 10.1038/173547a0 13154378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harry E: PretextView (Paired REad TEXTure Viewer): a desktop application for viewing pretext contact maps.2022; [Accessed 19 October 2022]. Reference Source
  13. Henniges MC, Powell RF, Mian S, et al. : A taxonomic, genetic and ecological data resource for the vascular plants of Britain and Ireland. Sci Data. 2022;9(1): 1. 10.1038/s41597-021-01104-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Howe K, Chow W, Collins J, et al. : Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation. GigaScience. 2021;10(1): giaa153. 10.1093/gigascience/giaa153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jay J, Yatsenko H, Narváez-Gómez JP, et al. : Sanger Tree of Life sample preparation: triage and dissection. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.x54v9prmqg3e/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kerpedjiev P, Abdennur N, Lekschas F, et al. : Higlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1): 125. 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lopes M, Silva AS, Séndon R, et al. : Towards the sustainable exploitation of salt-tolerant plants: nutritional characterisation, phenolics composition, and potential contaminants analysis of Salicornia ramosissima and Sarcocornia perennis alpini. Molecules. 2023;28(6):2726. 10.3390/molecules28062726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Dolezel J, et al. : Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. Ann Bot. 2007;100(4):875–888. 10.1093/aob/mcm152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, et al. : BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(10):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Maude PF: The merton catalogue. a list of the chromosome numerals of species of British flowering plants. New Phytologist. 1939;38(1):1–31. [Accessed 11 April 2024]. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  21. Narváez-Gómez JP, Mbye H, Oatley G, et al. : Sanger Tree of Life Sample homogenisation: covaris cryoPREP ® automated dry pulverizer V.1. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.eq2lyjp5qlx9/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Obermayer R, Leitch IJ, Hanson L, et al. : Nuclear DNA C-values in 30 species double the familial representation in pteridophytes. Ann Bot. 2002;90(2):209–217. 10.1093/aob/mcf167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Onions CT: The Oxford dictionary of English Etymology.Oxford: Clarendon Press,1966. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  24. Pellicer J, Powell RF, Leitch IJ, et al. : The application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size, ploidy level endopolyploidy, and reproductive modes in plants.In: Besse, P. (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.).New York, NY: Humana,2021;2222:325–361. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, et al. : A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rhie A, McCarthy SA, Fedrigo O, et al. : Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature. 2021;592(7856):737–746. 10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rhie A, Walenz BP, Koren S, et al. : Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1): 245. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, et al. : BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210–3212. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stace CA, Thompson H, Stace M: New flora of the British Isles.4th ed. C&M Floristics,2019. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  30. Strickland M, Cornwell C, Howard C: Sanger Tree of Life fragmented DNA clean up: manual SPRI. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y1dg8j/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Surana P, Muffato M, Qi G: Sanger-tol/readmapping: sanger-tol/readmapping v1.1.0 - hebridean black (1.1.0). Zenodo. 2023a. 10.5281/zenodo.7755669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Surana P, Muffato M, Sadasivan Baby C: sanger-tol/genomenote (v1.0.dev). Zenodo. 2023b. 10.5281/zenodo.6785935 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Todorovic M, Oatley G, Howard C: Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA extraction: automated plant MagAttract v.2. Protocols.Io. 2023a. 10.17504/protocols.io.36wgq3n13lk5/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Todorovic M, Sampaio F, Howard C: Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA fragmentation: diagenode Megaruptor ®3 for PacBio HiFi. protocols.io. 2023b. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5x2zjg1b/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Valdés B, Castroviejo S: II: Platanaceae-Plumbaginaceae (partim).In: Castroviejo, S., Laínz, M., González, G. L., et al:(eds.) Flora Iberica – Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, Vol. II.Madrid, Spain: Real Jardín Botánico, C.S.I.C.,1990;531–533. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  36. Vasimuddin Md, Misra S, Li H, et al. : Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems. In: 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). IEEE,2019;314–324. 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang L, Ma G, Wang H, et al. : A draft genome assembly of halophyte Suaeda aralocaspica, a plant that performs C 4 photosynthesis within individual cells. GigaScience. 2019;8(9): giz116. 10.1093/gigascience/giz116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of purple glasswort, Salicornia ramosissima Woods (Amaranthaceae). European Nucleotide Archive. [dataset], accession number PRJEB61611,2023.
  39. Zhou C: c-zhou/oatk: Oatk-0.1. 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.7631375 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou C, McCarthy SA, Durbin R: YaHS: yet another Hi-C scaffolding tool. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(1): btac808. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23823.r100757

Reviewer response for version 1

Maria Cristina Duarte 1

This genome note reports the assembly and annotation of the genome of Salicornia ramosissima (Amaranthacea), a halophytic species found along the Atlantic and North Sea coasts of Europe.

The manuscript explains well the motivation behind sequencing the genome of this taxa (for example, its uses as food for humans and animals and its agricultural potential due to its ability to grow in salty habitats, making it a valuable resource for food security), but the need for genomic efforts to unravel the complex taxonomy of the Salicornia europaea aggregate could be further emphasised. In fact, Salicornia ramosissima belongs to a complex genus and its taxonomic position is not consensual; some authors and reference databases, such as Plants of the World Online (POWO), place it as a synonym of Salicornia europaea; moreover, according to IPNI, Salicornia ramosissima J.Woods, Bot. Gaz. (London) 3(27): 29 (1851) is an invalid name. On the other hand, World Flora Online (WFO) accepts this taxa. Further taxonomical clarification of the species under study would be much appreciated.

The protocols used are publicly available and the manuscript describes the materials and methods in detail.

However, the herbarium voucher - K001400816 (Christenhusz nº 9300) - associated with the sequenced plant and referred to as deposited in the herbarium of RBG Kew (K) is not (yet?) available online in the Kew Data Portal. Moreover, a link to the herbarium specimen will be very useful.

The data sets are clearly presented and links to interactive tools are also available.

Some minor comments:

  • Amaranthaceae instead of Chenopodiaceae (in Abstract and in Species taxonomy)

  • Italic font is missing in some genus / species names (in Keywords and Species taxonomy)

  • According to POWO and WFO Sarcocornia is a synonym for Salicornia (in the Background).

  • S. ramosissima and not S. ramoisissima (in the Background).

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Plant systematics.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Oct 7. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23823.r100759

Reviewer response for version 1

Wentao Sheng 1

Dear authors,

Thank you for submitting this manuscript. The report of the genome from  Salicornia ramosissima has scientific value. But I have two questions to be resolved:

  1. There were only reported genomes, but no further analysis was conducted out.

  2. The style is chaotic, and it needs to be scientific standard, then it will be understood easily.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

plant breeding and genome

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23823.r97881

Reviewer response for version 1

Abhisek Chakraborty 1

The authors reported a chromosome-scale genome assembly of  Salicornia ramosissima in this data note with impressive assembly statistics. The first genome sequence from the  Salicornia genus will be valuable for the research community.

Suggestions:

  1. Report the LAI (LTR Assembly Index) score for the genome assembly.

  2. Perform the genome annotation and report the statistics, including the BUSCO value for the gene set.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Genome assembly, Evolutionary Genomics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of purple glasswort, Salicornia ramosissima Woods (Amaranthaceae). European Nucleotide Archive. [dataset], accession number PRJEB61611,2023.

    Data Availability Statement

    European Nucleotide Archive: Salicornia ramosissima. Accession number PRJEB61611; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB61611 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2023). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Salicornia ramosissima genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES