Abstract
Aims
This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise the publicly available research testing treatments for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID.
Methods
The following databases and repositories were searched in October–November 2023: Medline, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Internet, WANFANG Data, Web of Science’s Preprint Citation Index, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Articles were selected if they described participants with long COVID symptoms at least 4 weeks after SAR-CoV-19 infection, reported primary outcomes on mental health, cognition and/or psychological well-being, and were available with at least an English-language summary. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed.
Results
Thirty-three documents representing 31 studies were included. Seven tested psychosocial interventions, five pharmaceutical interventions, three natural supplement interventions, nine neurocognitive interventions, two physical rehabilitation interventions and five integrated interventions. While some promising findings emerged from randomised controlled trials, many studies were uncontrolled; a high risk of bias and insufficient reporting were also frequent.
Conclusions
The published literature on treatments for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID show that the interventions are highly heterogeneous and findings are inconclusive to date. Continued scientific effort is required to improve the evidence base. Regular literature syntheses will be required to update and educate clinicians, scientists, interventionists and the long COVID community.
Keywords: COVID-19
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
Long COVID presents as persistent, debilitating physical and psychological symptoms after COVID-19 infection; however, the literature on long COVID psychological treatments lacks an up-to-date synthesis.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
Our systematic review shows that the publicly available research on interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID is limited in number and quality, with minimal studies demonstrating efficacy overtime.
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY
Rigorous testing of integrated treatments for long COVID is needed, with consideration of the multisystemic nature of this condition.
Ongoing literature synthesis and knowledge translation are recommended to inform clinicians and patients of appropriate treatment approaches.
Introduction
Although acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 can be mild and time limited, with recovery over days or weeks, a subset of patients experience long-term symptoms, which can persist for months or years after the acute infection.1 This is referred to as long COVID or post-COVID-19 condition, among other terms.2 WHO defines long COVID as ‘the continuation or development of new symptoms three months after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, with these symptoms lasting for at least 2 months with no other explanation’.2 Long COVID is associated with a wide range of enduring symptoms that appear to be similar to other postviral syndromes,3 and which can have substantial impacts on patient well-being.4
The prevalence of long COVID appears to be around 13.9% among adults who experience an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.5 However, long COVID can affect patients with SARS-CoV-2 regardless of hospitalisation status or the severity of initial infection.6 Symptoms of long COVID appear to be multisystemic and include neuropsychiatric symptoms. Some of the most common symptoms include fatigue, dyspnoea, ‘brain fog’ or cognitive dysfunction, headache, attention problems.3 Mental health symptoms and conditions are associated with long COVID, including generalised anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and post-traumatic stress disorder.3 Substantial impacts on mental health, well-being and coping with the challenges of everyday life have been noted by patients.4
Clinical practice guidelines for long COVID call for integrated and multidisciplinary care.1 Long COVID management requires multilevel and collaborative healthcare pathways including medical, specialist and community care.1 Also key to collaboration are a clear delineation of responsibilities, continuity of care and navigational support.7 Patients with long COVID have called for integrated care pathways that span the full spectrum of services and include mental healthcare.8 People with long COVID are a vulnerable population as they struggle with the unknowns of this condition and seek help in potential treatments that may or may not be effective.
We conducted a systematic review of registered trials examining treatments for mental health and related constructs among individuals with long COVID .9 10 While a range of research was under way at the time, the results have yet to be synthesised. In 2022, the interventions focusing on mental health were mapped as per scoping review methodology; as is standard, the scoping review was considered a precursor to the systematic review, given the early state of the literature. It was found that the research that had been completed in 2022 was limited, diverse, of variable quality and in urgent need of further advancement. Given the novelty of long COVID, the rapid pace of the literature and the expressed need of people living with long COVID to understand effective treatment options, frequent literature synthesis updates are required. As the literature matures, a systematic review is now feasible.
Objectives
This systematic review synthesises the literature on publicly available interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being among individuals with long COVID. We aim to synthesise (1) the outcomes of these interventions and (2) the design and quality of the trials.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (see Supplemental File 2).11 It adheres to a published protocol (masked). Lived experience engagement is reported using the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public12 short checklist (table 1).
Table 1. Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public reporting checklist for lived experience engagement in research.
Section and topic | Description |
---|---|
(1) Aim | This review is part of a larger project that included lived experience voices to help guide research on mental health in long COVID. The aim of engagement as part of the current systematic review was to ensure that the information sought from the literature and the reporting of the results was consistent with the needs and priorities of individuals living with the condition. |
(2) Methods | From the full project engagement team, two lived experience panel members joined the systematic review subproject. After a year of ongoing meetings on the full project, they attended four review-specific meetings with the research lead and a research staff and reviewed and critically appraised the manuscript. Topics of discussion included the overarching study outline, search term selection, items for data extraction, and a review of findings and interpretations, with a constant focus on gaps, additions and novel insights. They reviewed the manuscript and are coauthors on it. |
(3) Study results | Advisors made useful suggestions at each stage of the consultation. Examples include the addition of the search term ‘brain fog’, addition of the data extraction about the timeframe of recruitment and amount of time participants had long COVID, discussion of the slow pace of research and the hope that people with long COVID can still hold for treatments, a focus on the importance of these results to the long COVID community and an emphasis on the importance of continuing to do this work in the future. They also emphasised the importance of contextualising mental health challenges in long COVID, noting that if mental health is not addressed sensitively, it can undermine individuals’ experiences, stigmatise them and block pathways to accessing healthcare and improving their health. |
(4) Discussion and conclusions | The engaged advisors were able to make concrete, relevant contributions to this systematic review. By ensuring that the patient voices are embedded throughout the review, we were able to maintain a focus on the importance of the findings to people living with long COVID. The review became more relevant to their experience and to the experience of other people in the long COVID community. The advisors who were engaged expressed that they felt valued, appreciated the opportunity to contribute and considered it important that their perspectives were taken into account. |
(5) Reflections/Critical perspective | Lived experience engagement was a highly valuable endeavour in the conduct of this review. The engaged advisors made interesting and important contributions to the review, from the search design stage to manuscript writing. Lived experience engagement in systematic reviews is an appropriate and valuable process. |
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in table 2. Following the problem/population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO)13 framework, our review focuses on clinical trials with individuals with long COVID (population), investigating any type of treatment (intervention), with or without a comparison group (comparison) and reporting as primary outcomes patients’ mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in relation to long COVID (outcomes). We focused on these primary outcomes to ensure that the literature reviewed had a substantial focus on mental health, cognition and psychological well-being, rather than including the extensive interventions aiming to improve a physical health metric such as a respiratory variable, for which an exploratory analysis of mental health was conducted.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the literature search process.
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
---|---|
Recruited patients with long COVID symptoms at least 4 weeks after a confirmed or suspected infection of SAR-CoV-19 | Participants without long COVID |
Any interventions reporting a primary aim or primary outcomes focusing on mental health, cognition or psychological well-being | Primary aim or primary outcomes were not mental health, cognition and psychological well-being (eg, physical health or biomarker outcomes) |
Published articles or abstracts, manuscripts under review, unreviewed preprints or unpublished summaries | Animal trials, treatment guidelines, trial protocols, critical reviews or opinion papers |
Reports written in any language, with an attempt to obtain an English-language summary for full inclusion | Trials conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, before 2020) |
Participants from any age group or sociodemographic population | |
Trials conducted in any country, beginning in 2020 or later |
To be considered long COVID, the studies had to include patients who were experiencing persisting symptoms at least 4 weeks after the onset of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Clinical trials could be conducted in any country, with any age group and sociodemographic characteristics, in any language. The search was conducted in both English and Chinese given the spoken languages of the authors.
Literature retrieval
A health sciences librarian (TR) developed a comprehensive search strategy with the research team. The librarian conducted the searches on 30 October 2023 in Medline, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science’s Preprint Citation Index, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. A team member with a Chinese background (DX) translated the search strategy for Chinese databases and ran the searches in China National Knowledge Internet and WANFANG Data databases on 6 November 2023. All search strategies are included in the online supplemental materials (onlinesupplemental files 2 3).
Considering the fast-moving literature on long COVID, search strategies were tested and refined iteratively between the protocol’s publication in September 2022 and the review in October 2023. Database-specific subject headings, and keywords in natural language, and advanced search operators were used to operationalise and optimise two concepts: (1) long COVID, (2) mental health, cognition, psychological well-being. The long COVID cluster was based on the University of Alberta Library’s long COVID search filter,14 updated to reflect new variants and terminology as of 30 October 2023. These two concepts were combined using Boolean operators and then limited to clinical trials using the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health’s search filter for all clinical trial types.15
To supplement the main searches, a hand search of reference lists and Google Scholar was conducted, along with searches of titles and authors of registered trials identified in our previous systematic review and scoping review.9 10 For articles written in languages other than English, French or Chinese, a research staff contacted the corresponding authors for English summaries.
Study screening and selection
The English-language database searches yielded 1927 records. An additional 18 records were discovered by hand searching and contacting authors. All records were uploaded into Covidence software. After the removal of duplicates, 1433 unique articles were screened at the title and abstract level by two independent reviewers, and 87 full texts were screened by the same reviewers. The Chinese-language searches generated 1307 records. After the removal of duplicates, 929 records were screened by two independent reviewers at the title/abstract level and 23 at the full-text level. No studies from the Chinese-language searches met the criteria for inclusion in the review. In total, 33 documents representing 31 studies were included in the current review. See the PRISMA flow chart in figure 1.
Figure 1. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for study selection.
Data extraction
Data were extracted from the 33 documents (31 studies) into an Excel spreadsheet by one research staff, and later verified by a second team member. Any uncertainty or conflict was discussed and resolved with the research lead.
Data synthesis
Data are summarised in tables3 4 and in online supplemental tables 1 and 2 and narratively synthesised in the ‘Results’ section.
Table 3. Overview of selected studies.
Variable | N | % |
---|---|---|
Intervention type | ||
Psychosocial interventions | 7 | 23 |
Pharmaceutical interventions | 5 | 16 |
Natural supplement interventions | 3 | 10 |
Neurocognitive interventions | 9 | 29 |
Physical rehabilitation | 2 | 6 |
Integrated interventions | 5 | 16 |
Allocation | ||
Case studies/series | 7 | 23 |
Uncontrolled trials | 10 | 32 |
Randomised controlled trials | 11 | 35 |
Non-randomised controlled trials | 2 | 6 |
Qualitative studies | 1 | 3 |
Delivery format | ||
In person | 16 | 52 |
Virtual | 5 | 16 |
Hybrid | 3 | 10 |
Self-administered | 7 | 23 |
Location | ||
Asia | 1 | 3 |
Europe | 21 | 68 |
Middle East | 3 | 10 |
North America | 4 | 13 |
South America | 2 | 6 |
Recruitment start date | ||
2020 | 4 | 13 |
2021 | 11 | 35 |
2022 | 5 | 16 |
Not reported | 11 | 35 |
Primary outcome | ||
Mental health | 18 | 58 |
Cognition | 17 | 55 |
Psychological well-being | 12 | 39 |
Table 4. Study description.
Study | Intervention summary | Control intervention | Country | Design and sample size: treatment n (control n) | Time since COVID-19 | Treatment dose/duration | Relevant outcomes | Treatment results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psychosocial interventions | ||||||||
Bogucki and Sawchuk19 | Cognitive processing therapy to help identify, evaluate and restructure distorted cognitions with a focus on safety, trust, power, esteem and intimacy | n/a | USA | Case study: 1 (n/a) | >5 months | Twelve weekly individual sessions | PTSD, depression, anxiety, subjective report | Prepost reduction in PTSD symptoms and subjective functional improvement |
Huth et al20 | Cognitive behavioural therapy: goal setting, psychoeducation, stress reduction, attention and cognitive readjustment, management of physical activity | n/a | Germany | Single-arm trial: 64 (n/a) | M=62.45 (SD=27.67) weeks (13.29–121.14 weeks) | Eight 60 min weekly sessions | Somatic symptom distress, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, illness-related cognitions | Significant prepost reduction in helplessness; increase in acceptance, self-efficacy, perceived benefit of the intervention only |
McEwan et al21 | Online forest bathing: mindfulness with a slow walk in nature, with online group meetings | Repeated waitlist | UK | Repeated waitlist trial: 22 (n/a) | Months and years | Four 60 min, weekly group sessions | Anxiety, rumination, social connection | Significant prepost improvement in anxiety, rumination, social connection |
Nikrah et al22 | Acceptance and commitment therapy: to develop psychological flexibility, decision-making capacity | Waitlist | Iran | RCT: 15 (15) | At least 30 days | Seven 90 min weekly sessions | Resilience, health-related QoL | Group×time interaction not provided. May show increase in resilience, and overall health-related QoL |
Skilbeck23 | Cognitive behavioural therapy: self-management focus with psychoeducation, acceptance, goal setting and activity pacing | n/a | UK | Case study: 1 (n/a) | 8 months | Twelve 60 min individual sessions | QoL, depression, anxiety, subjective report | May show improvement (p values not provided) in QoL, depression and anxiety. Subjective treatment acceptability and improvement in daily life |
Vlake et al24 | ICU-specific virtual reality intervention: use of virtual reality to describe ICU procedures and treatments | No treatment | The Netherlands | RCT, open label: 45 (44) | 3 months | One time, 14 min session | Psychological distress, PTSD symptoms health-related QoL | Group×time interaction not provided. Significant improvement in PTSD symptoms at 3-month follow-up. Significantly fewer people with probable anxiety at 1-month follow-up |
Wright et al25 | The HOPE programme for long COVID: digital peer support intervention with positive psychology approaches | n/a | UK | Single-arm trial: 47 (n/a) | M=377.3 (SD=171.8) days | Eight weekly sessions | Positive mental well-being, self-efficacy, loneliness | Significant prepost improvement in positive mental well-being and self-efficacy only |
Pharmaceutical interventions | ||||||||
Bogolepova et al39 | Cholytilin (choline alfoscerate) or MexiB 6 | n/a | Russia | Single-arm trial: 50, 50 (n/a) | 5.4 months | Group 1: MexiB 6: 3 tablets daily Group 2: Cholytilin: 3 daily capsules (1200 mg) |
Cognition, anxiety, depression | Significant prepost improvement in cognitive functions, anxiety and depression for both treatment groups |
Esin et al40 | Anvifen: GABAergic nootropic drug | n/a | Russia | Single-armed trial: 92 (n/a) | 12 weeks | 500 mg, 3 times daily (21 days) | Anxiety, depression, cognition, health-related QoL—psychological component | Significant prepost improvement in cognitive functions, psychological component of health-related QoL, anxiety and depression |
MacIntyre et al41 | Vortioxetine: antidepressant | Placebo | Canada | RCT, double blind: 75 (74) | 3 months after acute COVID-19 infection | 5–20 mg/day (8 weeks) | Cognition, depression, health-related QoL | No significant group×time interaction for cognition. Significant group × time interaction for depression and health-related QoL |
Putilina et al42 | Cortexin | n/a | Russia | Single-arm trial: 979 (n/a) | 12 weeks or longer | 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day for 10 days | Mental state and attention | Significant prepost improvement in mental state and attention |
Tobinick et al43 | Etanercept | n/a | USA | Case study: 1 (n/a) | 12 months | One time 25 mg dose, perispinal administration | Cognition, depression | Improvement in cognition and depression post-treatment |
Natural supplement interventions | ||||||||
De Luca et al36 | Oral supplement containing palmitoylethanolamide and lutein, with olfactory training | n/a | Italy | Multi-arm trial: Group 1: 43 Group 2: 16 Group 3: 10 (n/a)* |
6 months or more | Palmitoylethanolamide 700 mg, luteolin 70 mg, one dose daily for 90 days | Mental clouding | Significant prepost reduction in mental clouding between baseline and 3 months for participants as a whole and one subgroup |
Karosanidze et al37 | Chisan/ADAPT-232: fixed combination of adaptogens Rhodiola, Eleutherococcus and Schisandra | Placebo | Georgia | RCT, quadruple blind: 50 (50) | 30 days | 30 mL, two doses daily for 14 days | Cognition, anxiety, depression | No significant group×time interaction. Significant prepost improvement in attention/memory, anxiety and depression |
Young et al38 | Endourage, formula C: hemp-derived, cannabidiol-rich supplement with trace of tetrahydrocannabinol | Placebo | USA | RCT, single blind: 12 (11) | 4 weeks and above | Starting at 0.25 mL, one dose daily for 28 days | QoL components | Group×time interaction not provided. Significant prepost improvement in QoL—emotional distress anxiety only |
Neurocognitive interventions | ||||||||
Cavendish et al26 Vidal et al35 |
Transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive training: non-invasive brain stimulation and online cognitive training | n/a | Brazil | Case series: 4 (n/a) | 2–4 months | 20 daily 20 minute sessions+cognitive training | Cognition, depression, emotional symptoms | May show decreases in cognitive, depressive and emotional symptoms (p values not provided) |
García-Molina et al27 | Outpatient neuropsychology rehabilitation programme: personalised cognitive training plan | No treatment | Spain | Controlled trial without randomisation: 91 (32) | M=7.7 (SD=3.45) months | Individualised 60 min weekly sessions (8 weeks) | Cognition, anxiety, depression | Group×time interaction not provided. Significant prepost differences in several cognitive functions, anxiety and depression |
Hausswirth et al28 | The Rebalance Programme: non-invasive cognitive stimulation and guided mindfulness training with sound therapy and light stimulations | Healthy control and long COVID control, no treatment | France | RCT: 17 (17, 15) | 4 weeks or several months | Ten 30 min sessions within 4 weeks | Cognition, mood, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, mental fatigue | Significant group×time interaction in mental fatigue, anxiety, depression, mood disturbance and on several cognitive domains |
Leitl et al29 | Cranial electrical stimulation: non-invasive brain stimulation as adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation | Sham treatment | Germany | RCT: 40 total | 10±5 months | Daily 60 min sessions (3 weeks) | Anxiety, depression | Group×time interaction not provided. Significant prepost reduction in depression, but not anxiety |
Łuckoś et al30 | EEG neurofeedback: neurofeedback with goal-oriented cognitive training | n/a | Poland | Case study: 1 (n/a) | ≥6 months | Twice weekly (15 weeks) | Cognition, subjective report | May show improvement in cognitive functions. Subjective report of independence and return to work |
Noda et al31 | Transcranial magnetic stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation with MagPro R30 TMS device with the Cool-B70 coil | n/a | Japan | Single-arm trial: 23 (n/a) | M=48.6 (SD=30.2) weeks | 20 daily sessions | Depression, difficulty with activities of daily living, cognitions | Significant prepost improvement of depression, and difficulty with activities of daily living and cognitive functions with large effect sizes |
Orendáčová et al32 | Neurofeedback: a neuromodulation method using EEG signals | n/a | Czech Republic | Single-arm trial: 10 (n/a) | 3–19 months (median 12 months) | Five 25–45 min sessions (2 weeks) | Anxiety, depression | Significant prepost reduction in anxiety and depression 1 week after treatment |
Sabel et al33 | Transcranial alternating current stimulation: non-invasive brain stimulation with neuromodulation device and psychological counselling | n/a | Germany | Case series: 2 (n/a) | Patient 1: 7 months Patient 2: 9 months |
Daily 30–45 min sessions (10 and 13 days) | Cognition, subjective report | Prepost improvement in cognitive measures. Subjective improvement in cognition and daily activities |
Santana et al34 | High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation: non-invasive brain stimulation with low amplitude sustained current targeting specific brain regions | Sham treatment | Brazil | RCT, triple blind: 35 (35) | 3–12 months | Ten 30 min sessions, twice a week | Cognitive and psychosocial fatigue, anxiety, health-related QoL | Significant group×time interaction in cognitive and psychosocial fatigue, anxiety and health-related QoL |
Physical rehabilitation | ||||||||
Bhaiyat et al44 | Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: exposure to 100% oxygen at 2 atmosphere absolute in a chamber | n/a | United Arab Emirates | Case study: 1 (n/a) | 3 months | Sixty 90 min sessions, 5 times a week | Cognition | Prepost improvement in memory and other cognitive domains |
Zilberman-Itskovich et al45 | Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: exposure to 100% oxygen by mask at 2 atmosphere absolute in a chamber | Sham treatment | Israel | RCT, double blind: 37 (36) | At least 3 months | Forty 90 min sessions, 5 times a week | Cognition, health-related QoL, psychological distress | Significant group×time interaction in total cognition and psychological distress only |
Integrated interventions | ||||||||
Brough et al46 | Psychoeducation and mind-body interventions: educational sessions about COVID-19 and long COVID experiences, strength and conditioning, memory, yoga, qigong, nutrition, meditation, mindfulness, aromatherapy | n/a | UK | Single-arm trial: 22 (n/a) | 2 months | Four or six weekly group sessions | Well-being | May show improvement (p values not reported) in well-being. Qualitative reports of satisfaction and usefulness |
Compagno et al47 | Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme: physical training, cognitive behavioural therapy, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy | n/a | Italy | Single-arm trial: 30 (n/a) | M=3 months (range 1–6 months) | Three 90 min physical training sessions, four psychological sessions | Health-related QoL—mental domain, anxiety, depression | Significant prepost improvements in health-related QoL—mental domain, depression, anxiety |
Raunkiae et al49 | Rehabilitation for long-term cognitive effects of COVID-19: needs assessment, neurocognitive screening, cognitive training, compensatory tools, energy conservation, psychoeducation, daily activity management | n/a | Denmark | Qualitative: 12 (n/a) | M=233 (SD=102) days (139–412 days) | 5-day residential, 12 weeks at home, 2 follow-up residential | Individual interview | Qualitative reports of improved understanding of their illness, improved daily activity management and coping with working life |
Philip et al48 | English National Opera Breathe programme: breathing retraining through singing techniques and lullabies | TAU | UK | RCT, single blind: 74 (76) | Treatment: M=330 (SD=124) days. Control: M=311 (SD=130) days | Six weekly 60 min sessions | Health-related QoL | Group×time interaction not provided |
Samper-Pardo et al50 | ReCOVERY Mobile app: nutrition, rest and sleep, physical exercises, breathing, cognitive exercises, community participation | TAU | Spain | RCT, open label: 52 (48) | M=16.12 (SD=6.34) months | Three motivational sessions, rehabilitation app (12 weeks) | Health-related QoL, cognition, emotional well-being, social support, self-efficacy | No significant group×time interactions |
Samper-Pardo et al51 | ReCOVERY Mobile app: nutrition, rest and sleep, physical exercises, breathing, cognitive exercises, community participation | TAU | Spain | RCT, open label: 52 (48) | M=16.12 (SD=6.34) months | Three motivational sessions, rehabilitation app (24 weeks) | Health-related QoL, cognition, emotional well-being, social support, self-efficacy | No significant group×time interaction |
Group 1: supplement+olfactory training; group 2: supplement only; group 3: supplement+previous olfactory training.
EEG, electroencephalographic; n/a, not available; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TAU, treatment as usual.
Risk of bias assessment
Quality assessment was conducted by two research staff independently. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to evaluate randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n=11) on five domains: randomisation, protocol deviation, missing data, outcome measurement and selection of reported results.16 We applied the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools Checklist for Case Series to both the case series and single-arm trials since the definition and criteria were applicable to these studies.17 Case studies with n=1 were assessed with the JBI Checklist for Case Reports.18 Results of the quality assessment are reported in online supplemental tables 2–4. The appraisal process was supported by continuing discussion with the lead researcher to resolve any conflict. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to the heterogeneity of the interventions tested across a wide range of observed outcomes.
Results
Thirty-three articles were identified (figure 1) that tested interventions using psychosocial approaches,19,25 neurocognitive rehabilitation,26,35 natural supplements,36,38 pharmaceutical treatments,39,43 physical rehabilitation44 45 or integrated approaches.46,51 There were 11 RCTs, as well as 2 controlled trials that were not randomised, 10 uncontrolled trials, 7 case studies or series and 1 qualitative study. The studies had been conducted across four continents, with recruitment of a total of 2477 participants in the early pandemic. Table 3 provides an overview of the studies and table 4 provides a descriptive summary. Detailed results are provided in online supplemental table 1 for uncontrolled trials and online supplemental table 2 for controlled trials. Across the studies, the quantitative primary outcome measures were established, validated psychometric tools.
Psychosocial interventions
Seven studies examined psychosocial interventions, including cognitive processing therapy,19 cognitive-behavioural therapy,20 23 acceptance and commitment therapy,22 virtual reality,24 forest bathing21 and a digital peer support intervention with positive psychology approaches.25 They were a mix of in-person and virtual treatments, with doses ranging from 1 to 12 sessions. Two were RCTs,22 24 one with a randomised waitlist control group,22 and one waitlist controlled.21 The others were single-armed trials and case studies.
An RCT on acceptance and commitment therapy found differences between the treatment and control groups at post-treatment for resilience and components of quality of life (QoL) favouring the treatment group. However, pretest scores were not controlled for, limiting the interpretation of the findings.22 In another RCT of a virtual reality treatment, a significantly smaller number of people in the treatment group reported psychological distress, post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety at post-treatment compared with the control group.24
A repeated waitlist controlled trial did not report on the control period, but showed significant prepost effects on anxiety, rumination and social connection.21 In an uncontrolled treatment feasibility trial, significant prepost differences emerged for self-efficacy, helplessness, acceptance and perceived benefit, but not for mental health symptoms.20 In another uncontrolled trial, significant prepost differences emerged for mental well-being and self-efficacy, but not loneliness25; however, these cannot be associated with the treatment in the absence of a control group. Two case studies with cognitive processing therapy19 and cognitive-behavioural therapy23 reported reductions in PTSD,19 depression and anxiety23 and an increase in QoL23 and daily functional improvements.19 23
Pharmaceutical interventions
Five studies of pharmaceutical treatments39,43 included one RCT,41 as well as single-armed trials39 40 42 and a case study.43 Treatment duration ranged from one time to daily for 2 months. The RCT, which examined an 8-week treatment with the antidepressant vortioxetine, showed a significant group by time interaction on depression and health-related QoL, with improvements over and above those in the control group.41 However, no significant group by time interaction was found for cognitive functions, despite significant prepost improvements. Findings from the single-armed trials showed significant prepost improvements across a wide range of variables with the use of selected pharmaceutical products39 40 42; however, change over time cannot be definitively associated with a treatment effect due to the lack of a control group. In a case study, a single peripheral administration of etanercept was associated with improved cognition and reduced depression after 24 hours and 29 days.43
Natural supplements
Three studies investigated the effectiveness of therapeutic natural supplements.36,38 A placebo-controlled RCT examined a hemp-deprived product with traces of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinoids.38 The authors did not report on group by time interaction effects; a significant prepost difference was only found for anxiety among the mental health, cognition and psychosocial variables examined. An RCT on an adaptogen formulation showed no significant group by time effects on cognitive and emotional symptoms, despite significant prepost improvements.37 A multi-armed trial was conducted of a treatment with palmitoylethanolamide and lutein, which are described to have anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective benefits.36 While significant prepost results suggest the possibility of treatment effectiveness in reducing mental clouding, this cannot be definitively concluded without a control group.
Neurocognitive interventions
Nine studies (representing 10 records) examined neurocognitive interventions.26,35 Intervention length ranged from 10 days to 4 months. Three studies were RCTs.28 29 34
Diverse treatments using neuromodulation were explored, including electroencephalogram neurofeedback30 32 and brain stimulation techniques such as cranial electrical stimulation,29 transcranial direct/alternating current stimulation33 34 and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.31 Three studies combined brain stimulation with cognitive training26 35 or mindfulness meditation.28 One study combined brain stimulation with eye stimulation.33
An RCT combining brain stimulation and mindfulness showed significant group by time interactions in several cognitive and psychological domains, although changes in other domains were not significant.28 An RCT of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation found significant group by time interactions for cognitive fatigue, psychosocial fatigue, anxiety and QoL.34 An RCT of cranial electrical stimulation reported significant prepost improvements depression, but not anxiety, and no information was provided on the group by time interaction.29 A study with a non-randomised controlled group found significant prepost improvements in both the treatment and control groups across cognition and mental health. Although they did not statistically examine treatment interaction effects, the effect sizes were larger in the treatment group than in the control group for some variables.27 Two studies presented significant prepost improvements in variables such as cognitive functions, anxiety and depression, but without control groups to confirm treatment effects.31 32 Participants in case studies reported positive outcomes over time for cognition, emotions, daily functioning and independent living.26 30 33 35
Physical rehabilitation
Two studies investigated five sessions per week of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, at 90 min of 100% oxygen at two atmosphere absolute.44 45 An RCT consisting of 40 sessions in 4 months with a sham control group45 demonstrated the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on total cognitive and psychological distress scores, with significant group by time interactions45; no significant group by time interaction was found for emotional limitations, emotional well-being or social functioning. A case study of a 60 session regimen reported prepost improvements in various neurocognitive domains.44
Integrated interventions
Five studies (representing six reports) described integrated interventions.46,51 These included diet and nutrition, self-management, meditation, cognitive training and rehabilitation. Treatment duration ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months. One RCT examined a rehabilitation mobile app promoting QoL.50 51 Analyses of change scores indicated no significant differences across a range of mental health, cognition and well-being-related variables in the context of low treatment adherence. A 6-month follow-up report in preprint form shows continued non-significance. For the other RCT, the authors reported significant improvement in the mental health composite score.48 Among the uncontrolled single-arm trials with prepost metrics, studies suggested improvements over time.46 47 A qualitative study found that integrated cognitive psychoeducational training contributed to the development of an insightful understanding of long COVID symptoms and helped participants manage their daily living and work.49
Quality assessment
Overall, five RCTs were rated as low risk, three as high risk and two as having some concerns. Almost all case series and single-arm trials presented clear details on inclusion criteria, outcome measurements and clinical information of the samples. However, none of the case series and single-arm trials reported whether there was consecutive or complete inclusion of participants. Most were missing details on ethnicity and education and did not report on adverse events or study location demographic descriptions. Three out of five case studies (n=1) did not report on whether there were any adverse events during treatment. Most of the case studies reported sufficient information on the patient’s clinical profile and the study protocol.
Discussion
This systematic review synthesised the evidence on interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in patients with long COVID. Results reveal a highly heterogeneous literature, a range of treatment modalities and study designs of various levels of rigour. While significant improvements were found among participants for some variables in most studies over time, much of the research is lacking the control group necessary to confirm the impact of the intervention, and it is important to note that this body of literature therefore does not demonstrate efficacy. Based on quality assessments, the quality of the emerging evidence raises significant concern.
As a whole, participants showed improvements over time across the body of research, across a range of metrics. This confirms that individuals with long COVID improve in their mental health, cognition and well-being over time, which is encouraging. Since the improvements were also seen in control groups, such improvement could be independent of treatment52 and may vary based on the amount of time the individuals have had long COVID. Caution is required when interpreting treatment effects without a control group. Definitively establishing the size of the effect of the temporal improvement, with rigorous methods and generalisable results, would help mitigate this challenge.
Among the trials with control groups, some found significant treatment effects on some variables, while others did not. A pharmacological treatment (vortioxetine) achieved effects on QoL and depression,41 both of which are substantially affected in long COVID.4 Forms of brain stimulation achieved treatment effects across depression, anxiety and cognitive domains.28 34 While professional bodies and patients alike advocate for integrated interventions as the best practice for long COVID,1 8 only a limited number of such interventions have been rigorously tested. This is an important area for future research. To confirm the safety and efficacy of interventions, interventionists should consider evaluating integrated treatment models that incorporate the promising neurocognitive interventions and test them within well-designed RCTs to inform clinical practice. Existing integrated models of care for analogous conditions should be considered.
In our quality assessment, only five RCTs met the ‘low risk’ threshold, while many case series and single-arm trials lacked demographic and inclusion information.10 Given that long COVID has only a newly emerging treatment evidence base, our scoping review suggested that some of the research to date is of lower than ideal quality. It is possible that in the rush to generate evidence, certain research quality standards were sometimes overlooked. While the sense of urgency is real, it is important to balance urgency with quality standards. Some individuals living with long COVID may be desperate for effective treatments and may be vulnerable to unproven treatments, amplifying the need to generate high-quality evidence to support effective treatment pathways.
Long COVID is still a new clinical entity. Research is a slow process, with long timelines from protocol development to publication, and even longer delays before the implementation in clinical practice. However, rapid research is not always conducive to the highest high-quality outputs. In just over 4 years since COVID-19 manifested, 33 articles have been published on interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID. None were indexed in the Chinese-language databases, representing a gap in the Chinese-language literature. Despite quality gaps, this still represents a considerable effort to respond to a public health emergency. Many more studies are likely on the cusp of publication, providing hope for people living with long COVID. Frequent literature synthesis endeavours will be required, such as a living evidence synthesis. Additionally, the timing of infection and the COVID-19 variant contracted, before or after vaccination, may impact long COVID trajectories and treatment responses.
Limitations should be kept in mind. Notably, the systematic search was conducted in late 2023 and any articles published after the search date were not included. For pragmatic reasons, some articles were excluded due to language limitations after attempting to acquire English-language summaries. Imposing a different definition of long COVID (eg, 12 weeks) would have influenced the articles included in some cases. Meta-analyses could not be conducted due to intervention diversity and study limitations. Most of the registered trials included in our systematic review9 (masked reference) were at the end-of-grant knowledge translation stage, and investigators had not yet released the results for review.
In sum, limited high-quality research to date has tested interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID. The published research shows clinical and statistical heterogeneity and inconsistent findings. Minimal literature has been published on studies rigorously designed to demonstrate efficacy above and beyond the effect of time. Nevertheless, some promising findings provide hope for improvements over time. Ongoing research with appropriate methodologies is required to continue to build this small but emerging evidence base. As per treatment recommendations, integrated interventions should be tested, specifically those that leverage long COVID interventions showing preliminary promise, along with efficacious interventions for analogous conditions. Ongoing and regular literature syntheses are required to update and educate clinicians, scientists, interventionists and the long COVID community.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Wuraola Dada-Phillips and Weitao Bao for support in the manuscript selection process. We further thank Sheng Chen for the statistical support.
The funder had no involvement in the review process, manuscript writing or publishing decisions.
Footnotes
Funding: The study received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding #: WI1-179893).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Author note: Transparency declaration: The lead author (LDH) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted and that any discrepancies from the study as originally registered have been explained.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
References
- 1.Venkatesan P. NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:129. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00031-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization . Geneva, Switzerland:: World Health Organization; 2024. Post covid-19 condition (long covid)https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/post-covid-19-condition#:~:text=It%20is%20defined%20as%20the,months%20with%20no%20other%20explanation Available. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:16144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kennelly CE, Nguyen ATP, Sheikhan NY, et al. The lived experience of long COVID: A qualitative study of mental health, quality of life, and coping. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0292630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Perlis RH, Santillana M, Ognyanova K, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2238804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Augustin M, Schommers P, Stecher M, et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2021;6:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ladds E, Rushforth A, Wieringa S, et al. Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hawke LD, Nguyen ATP, Sheikhan NY, et al. Swept under the carpet: a qualitative study of patient perspectives on Long COVID, treatments, services, and mental health. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:1088. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10091-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hawke LD, Nguyen ATP, Ski CF, et al. Interventions for mental health, cognition, and psychological wellbeing in long COVID: a systematic review of registered trials. Psychol Med. 2022;52:2426–40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Al-Jabr H, Hawke LD, Thompson DR, et al. Interventions to support mental health in people with long COVID: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1186. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16079-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc . 2006;2006:359–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Campbell SM. Filter to retrieve studies related to long covid in the OVID medline database: geoffrey & robyn sperber health sciences library. University of Alberta. 2023. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RrEgiFH1M1k_V-S-xBbXrMZrXwaAJ7RO0Baa-U_9dL0/edit#heading=h.v97m5qxqnbli Available.
- 15.All Clinical Trials - MEDLINE, Embase . Ottawa:: CADTH; 2024. CADTH search filters database.https://searchfilters.cadth.ca/link/117 Available. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane; 2021. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth . 2020;18:2127–33. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, et al. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Aromatarisx EZM, editor. JBI; 2020. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bogucki OE, Sawchuk CN. Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder due to COVID-19-related traumas: A case study. Psychol Serv. 2023;20:533–7. doi: 10.1037/ser0000630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huth D, Bräscher A-K, Tholl S, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with post-COVID-19 condition (CBT-PCC): a feasibility trial. Psychol Med. 2024;54:1122–32. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McEwan K, Collett H, Nairn J, et al. The Feasibility and Impact of Practising Online Forest Bathing to Improve Anxiety, Rumination, Social Connection and Long-COVID Symptoms: A Pilot Study. IJERPH . 2022;19:14905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nikrah N, Bahari F, Shiri A. Effectiveness of the acceptance and commitment therapy on resilience and quality of life in patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Appl Nurs Res. 2023;73:151723. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Skilbeck L. Patient-led integrated cognitive behavioural therapy for management of long COVID with comorbid depression and anxiety in primary care - A case study. Chronic Illn. 2022;18:691–701. doi: 10.1177/17423953221113605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vlake JH, van Bommel J, Wils E-J, et al. Intensive Care Unit-Specific Virtual Reality for Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e32368. doi: 10.2196/32368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wright H, Turner A, Ennis S, et al. Digital Peer-Supported Self-Management Intervention Codesigned by People With Long COVID: Mixed Methods Proof-of-Concept Study. JMIR Form Res . 2022;6:e41410. doi: 10.2196/41410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cavendish BA, Lima A, Bertola L, et al. Combination of transcranial direct current stimulation with online cognitive training improves symptoms of Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19: A case series. Brain Stimul. 2022;15:1375–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.García-Molina A, García-Carmona S, Espiña-Bou M, et al. Rehabilitación neuropsicológica en el síndrome post-COVID-19: resultados de un programa clínico y seguimiento a los 6 meses. Neurol. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2022.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hausswirth C, Schmit C, Rougier Y, et al. Positive Impacts of a Four-Week Neuro-Meditation Program on Cognitive Function in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2023;20:1361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Leitl D, Schneeberger T, Jarosch I, et al. Effects of cranial electrical stimulation in patients with post-covid syndrome with and without anxiety symptoms- a pilot randomized controlled trial. American Thoracic Society 2023 International Conference, May 19-24, 2023 - Washington, DC; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Łuckoś M, Cielebąk K, Kamiński P. EEG NEUROFEEDBACK IN THE TREATMENT OF COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTIONS AFTER THE INFECTION OF SARS-COV-2 AND LONG COVID-19. Acta Neuropsychol. 2021;19:361–72. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.2464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Noda Y, Sato A, Shichi M, et al. Real world research on transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment strategies for neuropsychiatric symptoms with long-COVID in Japan. Asian J Psychiatr. 2023;81:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Orendáčová M, Kvašňák E, Vránová J. Effect of neurofeedback therapy on neurological post-COVID-19 complications (A pilot study) PLoS One. 2022;17:e0271350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sabel BA, Zhou W, Huber F, et al. Non-invasive brain microcurrent stimulation therapy of long-COVID-19 reduces vascular dysregulation and improves visual and cognitive impairment. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021;39:393–408. doi: 10.3233/RNN-211249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Santana K, França E, Sato J, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for fatigue in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) Brain Stimul. 2023;16:100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vidal K, Cavendish B, Lima AL, et al. Combination of transcranial direct current stimulation with online cognitive training improves symptoms of Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19: a case series. Brain Stimul. 2023;16:232. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.De Luca P, Camaioni A, Marra P, et al. Effect of Ultra-Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide and Luteolin on Olfaction and Memory in Patients with Long COVID: Results of a Longitudinal Study. Cells . 2022;11:2552. doi: 10.3390/cells11162552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karosanidze I, Kiladze U, Kirtadze N, et al. Efficacy of Adaptogens in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022;15:345. doi: 10.3390/ph15030345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Young TP, Erickson JS, Hattan SL, et al. A Single-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Benefits and Safety of Endourage Targeted Wellness Formula C Sublingual +Drops in People with Post-Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 Syndrome. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024;9:282–92. doi: 10.1089/can.2022.0135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bogolepova AN, Osinovskaya NA, Kovalenko EA, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID syndrome: possible treatment approaches. RJTAO . 2021;13:88–93. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2021-4-88-93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Esin RG, Khayrullin IK, Esin OR, et al. Effectiveness of the anxiolytic Anvifen in the treatment of post-COVID brain fog. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2022;122:101–5. doi: 10.17116/jnevro2022122081101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McIntyre RS, Phan L, Kwan ATH, et al. Vortioxetine for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition: a randomized controlled trial. Brain (Bacau) 2023 doi: 10.1093/brain/awad377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Putilina MV, Mutovina ZY, Kurushina OV, et al. Determination of the Prevalence of Postcovid Syndrome and Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Drug Cortexin in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders in Patients with Postcovid Syndrome. Results of the CORTEX Multicenter Clinical and Epidemiological Observational Program. Neurosci Behav Physiol . 2022;52:836–41. doi: 10.1007/s11055-022-01307-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tobinick E, Spengler RN, Ignatowski TA, et al. Rapid improvement in severe long COVID following perispinal etanercept. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38:2013–20. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2096351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bhaiyat AM, Sasson E, Wang Z, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for long coronavirus disease-19: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2022;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03287-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zilberman-Itskovich S, Catalogna M, Sasson E, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves neurocognitive functions and symptoms of post-COVID condition: randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15565-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brough DN, Abel S, Priddle L. A service evaluation of a community project combining psychoeducation and mind-body complementary approaches to support those with long covid in the UK. Eur J Integr Med. 2022;55:102182. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Compagno S, Palermi S, Pescatore V, et al. Physical and psychological reconditioning in long COVID syndrome: Results of an out-of-hospital exercise and psychological - based rehabilitation program. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022;41:101080. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Philip KEJ, Owles H, McVey S, et al. An online breathing and wellbeing programme (ENO Breathe) for people with persistent symptoms following COVID-19: a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10:851–62. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00125-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raunkiaer M, Joergensen DS, Rasmussen A, et al. Experiences of improvement of everyday life following a rehabilitation programme for people with long-term cognitive effects of COVID-19: Qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33:137–48. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Samper-Pardo M, León-Herrera S, Oliván-Blázquez B, et al. Effectiveness of a telerehabilitation intervention using ReCOVery APP of long COVID patients: a randomized, 3-month follow-up clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2023;13:7943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35058-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Samper-Pardo M, Oliván-Blázquez B, León-Herrera S, et al. Effectiveness of recovery app to improve the quality of life of long covid patients: a 6-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. Primary Care Research. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.30.23294831. Preprint. [DOI]
- 52.Cuijpers P, Weitz E, Cristea IA, et al. Pre-post effect sizes should be avoided in meta-analyses. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017;26:364–8. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.