Table 2.
Author (Year) | Clear Research Question |
Population Specified and Defined | Participation Rate of Eligible Persons >50% |
All Subjects Similar Populations |
Sample Size Justification | Exposure (s) of Interest Measured Prior to the Outcome (s) |
Timeframe Sufficient to See Association |
Did the Study Examine Different Levels of Exposure? |
Exposure Measures Clearly Defined, Valid, Reliable, Implemented Consistently |
Exposure Assessed More than Once | Outcome Measures Clearly Defined, Valid, Reliable, Implemented Consistently |
Outcome Assessors Blinded to Exposure Status of Participants |
Loss to Follow-Up <20% | Confounding Variables Measured and Adjusted Statistically | Quality Rating (Good, Fair, Poor) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avnon and Anbar [24] | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | No | Good |
Avnon and Dubinsky [25] | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | Yes | Poor |
Ferrara [27] | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | No | Poor |
Hedegaard [28] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | Yes | Fair |
Kesary [26] | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | Yes | Fair |
Pawlak [29] | Yes | Yes | NR | No | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NR | NR | No | Poor |
NA = not applicable; NR = not reported.