Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2024;25(7):2421–2426. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.7.2421

Unraveling Copy Number Alterations in Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Correlation with Induction Phase Remission Using MLPA

Mururul Aisyi 1,*, Murti Andriastuti 2, Agus Susanto Kosasih 3, Ahmad Rusdan Handoyo Utomo 4, Fahreza Saputra 5, Teny Tjitra Sari 2, Hikari Ambara Sjakti 2, Fifi Dwijayanti 6, Kuntjoro Harimurti 7, Djajadiman Gatot 2
PMCID: PMC11480619  PMID: 39068576

Abstract

Objective:

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy occurring in children. Copy number alterations (CNA) like PAX5, CDKN2A/2B, PAR1 Region, ETV6, IKZF1, BTG1, and RB1 gene deletion are important genetic events that define and prognosticate B-cell ALL. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate associations of CNA with induction phase remission status in childhood B-cell ALL.

Methods:

This study was observational with a cross-sectional design at the Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Harapan Kita Mother and Children Hospital, and Tangerang Regional Public Hospital. We evaluated 74 pediatric B-cell ALL cases with 1-18-year-olds. Genomic DNA was analyzed by Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification Assay (MLPA). This study used the P335 ALL-IKZF1 panel kit, which contains several ALL-related genes. The patient’s clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected from medical records from January to December 2019.

Result:

We observed gene copy number alteration in children with B-Cell ALL. PAX5 was the most commonly observed gene deletion, followed by CDKN21/2B, ETV6, IKZF1, BTG1, RB1, and PAR1 Region. Based on gene mutations, only the PAX5 had a significant association with the remission status of pediatric B-cell ALL (p-value <0.05; OR = 3.91). It showed that patients with PAX5 gene mutations have 3.9 times the risk of no remission and/or relapse compared to those without PAX5 gene mutations.

Conclusion:

Patients with mutations in the PAX5 gene have a higher chance of not achieving remission and/or experiencing relapse than those without such mutations. The MLPA method can be utilized for examining copy number alterations, which is valuable for achieving more precise stratification in diagnosis.. Further research is needed to expand upon this finding.

Key Words: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Pediatrics, CAN, MLPA

Introduction

Pediatric cancer is a growing global public health concern, with cases increasing each year [1]. While the incidence of cancer in children is relatively lower compared to that in adults, it remains the leading cause of disease-related deaths among children. The most common type of childhood cancer is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), with an annual incidence rate of 3.5 per 100,000 children [2].

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), which is the most common cancer in children, accounts for approximately 25% of all pediatric cancers. The overall 5-year survival rate for this disease is currently over 80% in developed countries due to risk-directed treatment and better supportive care [3-5]. Risk-directed treatment involves two main components: first, identifying the genetic alterations in leukemic cells at the time of diagnosis, and second, evaluating the initial treatment response by measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy. The interpretation of MRD levels varies depending on the ALL subtype [6, 7].

During diagnosis, primary genetic abnormalities can be detected using karyotype and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) to determine the severity of the disease and decide on treatment options. However, due to the limited number of mitotic cells in bone marrow samples or the small specimen volume, almost 30% of ALL patients require accurate cytogenetic test results. This highlights the requirement for novel diagnostic methods as an alternative [8].

Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) has gained popularity as a tool for diagnosing various genetic diseases, including cancer. It is a cost-effective and efficient method for detecting large genomic rearrangements in patients. The technique is beneficial for identifying deletion and duplication patterns in genes linked with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, making it a valuable tool for stratifying this disease in children [9]. Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is a sensitive method based on multiplex polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis that detects multiple copies of about 50 different genomic DNA targets. It has the advantages of lower cost and faster turnaround time than DNA sequences for identifying significant genetic changes. It is now widely used to detect copy number changes in ALL patients [10, 11]. Various research studies [9-11] have pointed out that MLPA is an effective technique for identifying mutations and potential biomarkers of B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between Copy Number Alterations (CNA) and the remission status during the induction phase in B-cell ALL among children.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patients

This research is an observational study with a cross-sectional design. ALL cases of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) were collected from several hospitals, including Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Harapan Kita Mother and Children Hospital, and Tangerang Regional Public Hospital.. The diagnosis of leukemia is made by considering the patient’s symptoms and conducting relevant tests and exams.. Supporting examinations include peripheral blood examination, bone marrow aspiration analysis (cell morphology), immunophenotyping, cytochemistry, and cytogenetics. Pediatric patients aged 1-18 years and diagnosed with ALL B-lineage were included in this study.

Immunophenotyping examination of B-cell ALL is a leukemia that expresses CD markers. The criteria for B cell ALL express at least one of the following 3 CDs, namely CD19, CD79a, and CD22. LLA PreB or common ALL expresses CD LLA B cells plus CD10 expression, immature ALL B expresses CD markers LLA B cells plus CD10 can be positive or negative and cIgM, and mature ALL B expresses CD LLA B cells cIgM or sIgM or Igκ or λ. The immature precursors of B lymphocytes are called pre-B cells and are expressed by CD19 and CD22 antigens on the cell surface [12]. All patients have been treated according to the Indonesia ALL National Protocol. The protocol categorizes the risk as either high or standard risk.

There were 74 pediatric patients included in this study with a diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) B-lineage in 2019. Patients older than 18 years were excluded from the study. The data collected are demographic, clinical, laboratory results, frequency and type of Copy Number Alteration (CNA), and gene mutations. Patient demographic data consists of age and gender. The patient’s clinical data showed pallor, fever, bone pain, bleeding, lymphadenopathy, mediastinal mass, and clinical stratification. Copy Number Alteration (CNA) or gene mutation data looks at gene types of PAX5, CDKN2A/2B, PAR1 Region, ETV6, IKZF1, BTG1, and RB1. In addition, this study also looked at the number of CNAs by age group (<5 years, 6-10 years, and >10 years).

Genomic DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood of childhood patients using the QIAamp DNA mini-kit [Qiagen].

MLPA analysis

Genomic DNA was analyzed using MLPA, and some minor modifications were made. Several genes linked to ALL (EBF1, IKZF1, JAK2, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, ETV6, BTG1, RB1, ZFY, and PAR1 Region (SHOX, CRLF2, CSF2RA, IL3RA, and P2RY8) were included in the P335 ALL-IKZF1 panel kit, which was employed in this study. Parallel with patient samples, three healthy samples were also included in the process as normalization data. Samples were processed by the Genetic Analyzer 3500 [Applied Biosystems] and analyzed using the Coffalyser.NET software [MRC Holland] to evaluate the copy number alteration. Peak height from each sample will be compared to healthy donors to obtain a ratio value; the cut-off ratio was set at ≥ 1.2 for duplication and ≤ 0.8 for deletion.

Statistical analysis

We performed statistical analysis to calculate relevant descriptive statistics for the patient characteristics. We used average values of descriptive methods and standard deviations for the continuous variables while we described the data with frequencies and percentages for the categorical variables. We conducted the chi-square test to identify an association between gene mutation and remission status. Additionally, we used the Mann-Whitney test to compare the laboratory results with the CNAs. All analyses were two-sided, and we set the significance level at p < 0.05.

Results

In 2019, from January to December, 74 pediatric B-Cell ALL patients were tested for CNA at Dharmais National Cancer Center, Harapan Kita Mother and Child Hospital, and Tangerang Hospital. Of the 74 patients, 51.4% were males, and 59.5% were aged five or younger. Patients’ most common clinical characteristics were pallor (98.6%) and fever (90.5%). Moreover, 81.1% of patients were at high risk. Based on laboratory results, the average hemoglobin level was 8.75 g/dL, the average leukocyte count was 27079.47 /µL, and the average platelet count was 108660.81 /µL (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical and Laboratories Characteristics and Their Relation to Copy Number Alteration in Children with ALL

Characteristics Demographic Total n (%)
Age
≤ 5 years 44 (59.5%)
6 – 10 years 19 (25.7%)
≥ 10 years 11 (14.9%)
Gender
Female 36 (48.6%)
Male 38 (51.4%)
Clinical Pallor
No 1 (1.4%)
Yes 73 (98.6%)
Fever
No 7 (9.5%)
Yes 67 (90.5%)
Bone Pain
No 50 (67.6%)
Yes 24 (32.5%)
Bleeding
No 51 (68.9%)
Yes 23 (31.1%)
Lymphadenopathy
No 56 (75.7%)
Yes 18 (24.3)
Mediastinal mass
No 74 (100%)
Clinical Stratification
Standard Risk 14 (18.9%)
High Risk 60 (81.1%)
Laboratory
Hemoglobin (g/dL) (mean ± SD*) 8.75 ± 2.99
Leukocyte (/µL) (mean ± SD*) 27079.47 ± 65352.32
Platelet (/µL) (mean ± SD*) 108660.81 ± 146016.39

*Standar deviation

The CNA examination results indicated that out of the 74 patients, 11 had deletions with the PAX5 gene type (14.47%). Most of these deletions were found in exon 2-6 (2 people) and exon 7 (2 people). Additionally, only 1.32% of patients with the PAX5 gene had duplications, while 84.21% had no PAX5 gene abnormalities, either deletions or duplications (Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency and Type of Copy Number Alterations

Genes Deletion Duplication Normal
Exon number (patient with deleted genes) N (%) Exon number (patient with duplicated genes) N (%) N (%)
PAX5 1-10(2), 1-6(1), 2-6(2), 6-7(1), 7(2), 8(1), 10(1), 1(1) 11 (14.47) 1-10(1) 1 (1.32) 64 (84.21)
CDKN2A/2B AB(7), B(1) 8 (10.53) AB(1) 1 (1.32) 67 (88.16)
PAR1 Region SHOX, CRLF2, CSF2RA, IL3RA, P2RY8 (2), CSF2RA, IL3RA, P2RY8( 1) 3 (3.49) SHOX, CRLF2, CSF2RA, IL3RA, P2RY8 (6) 6 (6.98) 77 (89,53)
ETV6 1-8(4), 5-8(1), 5(1) 6 (8.11) - 0 (0.00) 68 (91.89)
IKZF1 1-8 (1), 2-8(2), 3-8(1), 4-7(1) 5 (6.76) - 0 (0.00) 69 (93.24)
BTG1 1(1), 2(1), 2-3(1), 2-4(1) 4 (5.41) - 0 (0.00) 70 (94.59)
RB1 6-26(3) 3 (4.05) - 0 (0.00) 71 (95.95)

In the CDKN2A/2B gene type, eight patients experienced deletions (10.53%), with the most deletions being exon AB (7 people). Meanwhile, 1.32% of patients with the CDKN2A/2B gene had duplications, and 88.16% had no CDKN2A/2B gene abnormalities, either deletions or duplications (Table 2). In the PAR1 Region gene type, three patients had deletions (3.49%), where the most deletions were exons SHOX, CRLF2, CSF2RA, IL3RA, and P2RY8 (2 people). Meanwhile, 6.98% of patients with the PAR1 Region gene had duplications, and 89.53% had no abnormalities in the PAR1 Region gene, either deletions or duplications. The ETV6, IKZF1, BTG1, and RB1 gene types have deletions below 10% and do not experience duplication. More than 90% of patients without ETV6, IKZF1, BTG1, and RB1 gene abnormalities (Table 2). The distribution of CNAs by age group showed that the distribution of 3 or more CNAs was most significant in the B-Cell of ALL patients aged <5 years, as well as the number of CNAs, 1 CNA, and 2 CNAs (Table 3).

Table 3.

Clinical and Laboratories Characteristics and Their Relation to Copy Number Alteration (CNA) in Children with ALL

No. of CNAs <5 year (N= 44), n (%) 6-10 years (N= 19), n (%) >10 years (N= 11), n (%)
3 or more CNAs 6 (60.0%) 2 (20.0%) 2 (20.0%)
2 CNAs 9 (69.2%) 4 (30.8%) 0 (0.0%)
1 CNA 4 (66.7%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%)
No CNA 25 (55.6%) 12 (26.7%) 8 (17.8%)

No relationship exists between the type and number of CNAs and the remission status of B-Cell ALL patients in children. Based on gene mutations, only the PAX5gene mutation had a significant association with the remission status of ALL patients in children (p-value <0.05; OR = 3.91). Patients with PAX5 gene mutations have a 3.9 times higher risk of not remission or relapse than those without PAX5 gene mutations (Table 4).

Table 4.

Association of Copy Number Alterations and Gene Mutation with Remission Status

Variables Remission Status OR
No Remission and relapse
N (%)
Remission
N (%)
CNA
Negative 19 (39.6%) 29 (60.4%) 1,048
Positive 10 (38.5%) 16 (61.5%)
No. of CNAs
3 or more CNAs 5 (50.0%) 5 (50.0%) 0.890
2 CNAs 5 (38.5%) 8 (61.5%)
1 CNA 2 (33.3%) 4 (66.7%)
No CNA 17 (37.8%) 28 (62.2%)
Gene mutation PAX5
Yes 8 (66.7%) 4 (33.3%) 3.906
No 21 (33.9%) 41 (66.1%)
CDKN2A/2B
No 23 (35.4%) 42 (64.6%) 0.274
Yes 6 (66.7%) 3 (33.3%)
PAR1 Region
No 27 (41.5%) 38 (58.5%) 2.487
Yes 2 (22.2%) 7 (77.8%)
ETV6
No 27 (39.7%) 41 (60.3%) 1.317
Yes 2 (33.3%) 4 (66.7%)
IKZF1
No 26 (37.7%) 43 (62.3%) 0.403
Yes 3 (60.0%) 2 (40.0%)
BTG1
No 27 (38.6%) 43 (61.4%) 0.628
Yes 2 (50.0%) 2 (50.0%)
RB1
No 29 (40.8%) 42 (59.2%) 0.275
Yes 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%)

Discussion

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is a malignancy of B or T lymphoblasts characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal, immature lymphocytes and their progenitors, which ultimately leads to the replacement of bone marrow elements and other lymphoid organs, resulting in a characteristic disease pattern. Patients typically present with symptoms related to anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia due to the replacement of the bone marrow with the tumor. Symptoms include fatigue, straightforward or spontaneous bruising and bleeding, and infections. Additionally, B-symptoms, such as fever, night sweats, and unintentional weight loss, are often present but may be mild, and hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy can be seen in up to half of adults on the presentation [13].

The present retrospective analysis was initiated to comprehensively investigate and analyze the prognostic role of CNAs in our cohort of pediatric B-ALL cases. The role of genetics in B-ALL has received much attention. The first report of genome-wide analysis in childhood ALL, integrating cytosine methylation profiling and DNA copy number alterations (CNA), was in 2013 [14]. Genomic assessments have identified numerous novel copy-number alterations (CNAs) that typically affect genes involved in lymphoid differentiation, proliferation, cell cycle regulation, and transcription [15]. Copy number alterations (CNAs) are constantly gaining relevance as potential risk stratification markers [16]. In contrast to cytogenetic chromosomal translocations, commonly initiating events, these CNAs usually cooperate with genomic aberrations that correlate with specific genomic subtypes and influence the ultimate patient outcome [15, 17].

Research in Mexico (2018) shows exciting findings in this study of over 200 children with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL. More frequently expected Complete Blood Count (CBC) findings, consisting of leucocytosis plus cytopenia, were found in only about 1 in 4 cases (27%); interestingly, anemia, present in 83% of the current cohort, was one of the most frequent CBC abnormalities. This was the same percentage as for thrombocytopenia, although in different patients. Leucocytosis, alone or combined with another abnormality, was considerably less frequent in only 37% of the children and almost the same as its opposite, leukopenia, found in 36.5% of the cases [18].

Researchers have described several PAX5-fusions so far, and these fusions involve various genes that encode proteins with diverse functions in signaling, transcription, chromatin remodeling, and cell structuring [19]. PAX5 (9p13), a paired box gene family member, is a transcription factor necessary for normal hematopoietic development [20]. In childhood B-ALL, mutations in PAX5 have been detected in 32% of cases by genome-wide analysis [21, 22]. PAX5 rearrangements occur with an incidence of about 2.5%, with numerous reported rearrangements, including ETV6 (12p13) and JAK2 (9p24) [23]. Recently, a heterozygous germline PAX5 variant, c.547G > A, encoding p.Gly183Ser, was identified in two unrelated families with autosomal dominant B-ALL, suggesting that PAX5 mutations may play a role in the inherited susceptibility of B-ALL [24].

Despite overall treatment progress, relapsed B-ALL has a dismal prognosis with an overall survival of 30% [25]. Several genetic subtypes and aberrations are associated with high treatment failure risk, including CDKN2A/B, ETV6, and IKZF1 mutations. Relapse occurs across all B-ALL subtypes, with some cases demonstrating the acquisition of additional chromosomal abnormalities over time. According to Mullighan et al. (2008), around 50% of B-ALL have CNAs in genes that regulate B-lymphoid development, especially in PAX5 and IKZF1 genes [24]. In this study, PAX5 gene mutation had a significant association with the remission status of ALL patients in children. About 33.3% of B-ALL in pediatrics have the mutation PAX5 and are in remission.

The transcription factor paired-box domain 5 (PAX5) located on the 9p13 chromosome is a crucial regulator of the early stages of B cell development [26]. At the molecular level, PAX5 induces B-cell differentiation by activating B-cell-specific genes, crucial components of the pre-BCR signaling pathway [27]. Additionally, it is responsible for inhibiting progress toward other cell lineages through PD-1 and NOTCH1 transcription factors’ negative regulation and M-CSFR inhibition [28]. Any change in PAX5 expression, limited to B-cells only, can lead to leukemogenesis and trigger malignancy [29].

The PAX5 gene constitutes the most critical target of somatic mutations in BCP-ALL in children, with its mutation being considered one of the most common genetic lesions in the B-ALL [30]. PAX5 alterations include DNA copy number variations (CNVs), sequence mutations, and chromosomal translocations with an incidence of 30% in the case of CNVs, 5–9% in non-silence sequence mutations, 5–7% in children, and 2–4% in adults with chromosomal translocations [31-34].

Identification of ALL biomarkers and a better understanding their molecular basis may lead to better monitoring of the disease course. In-depth identification of the genetic aberrations in these neoplasms is essential for assessing the risk of recurrence and implementing molecular-targeted therapy to reduce this risk [35]. A more accurate risk calculation will allow for better treatment of ALL with fewer side effects [36]. However, extensive screening for genetic susceptibility to leukemia is not recommended because of the potentially significant false predictive value. Many children with genetic variants peculiar to ALL will never develop it [37].

Based on gene mutation, only PAX5 had a significant association with the remission status of children with B-Cell ALL. Patients with PAX5 gene mutation have a higher chance of no remission or relapse than those without PAX5 gene mutations. PAX5gene mutations often occur in leukemia patients, so more appropriate protocols are needed. The MLPA method can be used for CNA examination, which is helpful in seeing more precise stratification in diagnosis. Further research is required to investigate the other factor of remission status in childhood B-cell ALL.

Acknowledgements

General

No acknowledgments are required for this manuscript.

Approval

No approvals were required for the research conducted or data used in this manuscript.

Ethical Declaration

The ethical aspects of this research were carefully considered and addressed. The Dharmais Cancer Center Hospital No.244/KEPK/X/2022 and Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia KET-1201/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2022 approved all human participant procedures. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before their involvement in the study. Additionally, appropriate measures were taken to ensure the confidentiality and anonymity of participants’ data.

Study Registration

This study was not registered in any registering dataset for clinical trials, guidelines, or meta-analysis.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author Contribution Statement

The authors declare that there are no specific contributions to report for this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Fung A, Horton S, Zabih V, Denburg A, Gupta S. Cost and cost-effectiveness of childhood cancer treatment in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e001825 . doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Howlader NN, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Neyman N, Altekruse SF, e al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. National Cancer Institute; 2014 . [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pui CH, Nichols KE, Yang JJ. Somatic and germline genomics in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(4):227–40. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0136-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, Bowman WP, Sandlund JT, Kaste SC, et al. Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2730–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(16):1541–52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1400972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pui CH, Pei D, Raimondi SC, Coustan-Smith E, Jeha S, Cheng C, et al. Clinical impact of minimal residual disease in children with different subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with response-adapted therapy. Leukemia. 2017;31(2):333–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O’Connor D, Enshaei A, Bartram J, Hancock J, Harrison CJ, Hough R, et al. Genotype-specific minimal residual disease interpretation improves stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):34–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Y, Miller S, Roulston D, Bixby D, Shao L. Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis improves prognostication of acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18(4):595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fu X, Shi Y, Ma J, Zhang K, Wang G, Li G, et al. Advances of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology in molecular diagnostics. Biotechniques. 2022 doi: 10.2144/btn-2022-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schwab CJ, Jones LR, Morrison H, Ryan SL, Yigittop H, Schouten JP, et al. Evaluation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as a method for the detection of copy number abnormalities in b-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49(12):1104–13. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stanulla M, Dagdan E, Zaliova M, Möricke A, Palmi C, Cazzaniga G, et al. Ikzf1(plus) defines a new minimal residual disease-dependent very-poor prognostic profile in pediatric b-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(12):1240–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liang D, Pui C. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In: Hofbrand av, catovsky d, tuddenham egd., editors. Leukemia. Slovenia: Blackwell publishing: 2005. pp. 547–558. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Puckett Y, chan O. Acute lymphocytic leukemia. Treasure island (fl): Statpearls publishing: 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Figueroa ME, Chen SC, Andersson AK, Phillips LA, Li Y, Sotzen J, et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):3099–111. doi: 10.1172/JCI66203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moorman AV, Enshaei A, Schwab C, Wade R, Chilton L, Elliott A, et al. A novel integrated cytogenetic and genomic classification refines risk stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;124(9):1434–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-562918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ampatzidou M, Florentin L, Papadakis V, Paterakis G, Tzanoudaki M, Bouzarelou D, et al. Copy number alteration profile provides additional prognostic value for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated on bfm protocols. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:13. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benard-Slagter A, Zondervan I, Groot K, Ghazavi F, Sarhadi V, Vlierberghe P, et al. Digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for detection of key copy number alterations in t- and b-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2017:19. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jaime-Pérez JC, García-Arellano G, Herrera-Garza JL, Marfil-Rivera LJ, Gómez-Almaguer D. Revisiting the complete blood count and clinical findings at diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 10-year experience at a single center. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2019;41(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Denk D, Bradtke J, König M, Strehl S. Pax5 fusion genes in t(7;9)(q11 2;p13) leukemia: A case report and review of the literature. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nutt SL, Heavey B, Rolink AG, Busslinger M. Commitment to the b-lymphoid lineage depends on the transcription factor pax5. Nature. 1999;401(6753):556–62. doi: 10.1038/44076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2007;446(7137):758–64. doi: 10.1038/nature05690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Woo JS, Alberti MO, Tirado CA. Childhood b-acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A genetic update. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2014;3:16 . doi: 10.1186/2162-3619-3-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nebral K, Denk D, Attarbaschi A, König M, Mann G, Haas OA, et al. Incidence and diversity of pax5 fusion genes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23(1):134–43. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shah S, Schrader KA, Waanders E, Timms AE, Vijai J, Miething C, et al. A recurrent germline pax5 mutation confers susceptibility to pre-b cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1226–31. doi: 10.1038/ng.2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rivera GK, Zhou Y, Hancock ML, Gajjar A, Rubnitz J, Ribeiro RC, et al. Bone marrow recurrence after initial intensive treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2005;103(2):368–76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hütter G, Kaiser M, Neumann M, Mossner M, Nowak D, Baldus CD, et al. Epigenetic regulation of pax5 expression in acute t-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2011;35(5):614–9. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Souabni A, Jochum W, Busslinger M. Oncogenic role of pax5 in the t-lymphoid lineage upon ectopic expression from the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. Blood. 2007;109(1):281–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-009670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Iacobucci I, Lonetti A, Paoloni F, Papayannidis C, Ferrari A, Storlazzi CT, et al. The pax5 gene is frequently rearranged in bcr-abl1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia but is not associated with outcome A report on behalf of the gimema acute leukemia working party. Haematologica. 2010;95(10):1683–90. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.020792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shahjahani M, Norozi F, Ahmadzadeh A, Shahrabi S, Tavakoli F, Asnafi AA, et al. The role of pax5 in leukemia: Diagnosis and prognosis significance. Med Oncol. 2015;32(1):360 . doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0360-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lejman M, Chałupnik A, Chilimoniuk Z, Dobosz M. Genetic biomarkers and their clinical implications in b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gu Z, Churchman ML, Roberts KG, Moore I, Zhou X, Nakitandwe J, et al. Pax5-driven subtypes of b-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2019;51(2):296–307. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0315-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li JF, Dai YT, Lilljebjörn H, Shen SH, Cui BW, Bai L, et al. Transcriptional landscape of b cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on an international study of 1,223 cases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(50):E11711–e20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814397115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dang J, Wei L, de Ridder J, Su X, Rust AG, Roberts KG, et al. Pax5 is a tumor suppressor in mouse mutagenesis models of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125(23):3609–17. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-626127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu YF, Wang BY, Zhang WN, Huang JY, Li BS, Zhang M, et al. Genomic profiling of adult and pediatric b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. EBioMedicine. 2016;8:173–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saraiva D, Santos SDS, Monteiro GTR. Leukemia mortality trends in children and adolescents in brazilian state capitals: 1980-2015. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2018;27(3):e2017310 . doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742018000300004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee SHR, Li Z, Tai ST, Oh BLZ, Yeoh AEJ. Genetic alterations in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Interactions with clinical features and treatment response. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:16. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Malard F, Mohty M. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1146–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES