Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a significant health issue that could have serious implications for the well-being of women and their offspring. Prenatal vitamins are widely used, but deficiency still occurs frequently in the preconception period, during pregnancy, and in breastfed infants.
We analyzed the association between prenatal VDD and maternal and fetal health outcomes by reviewing studies conducted in Europe. The literature was searched for articles published in the last 10 years focusing on preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, low birth weight, asthma, and autism spectrum disorder. We identified a total of 43 review articles, 31 original articles, and two guidelines.
During pregnancy, VDD is associated with a higher likelihood of developing gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. It may also lead to an increase in the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, as well as asthma, and autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. While the official guidelines for vitamin D dosage differ in various countries, health authorities usually recommend a total daily supplement intake of 400-2,000 IU.
In conclusion, this review emphasizes the importance of establishing guidelines for vitamin D supplementation as well as the requirement of official standards for the consumption of vitamin D in the prenatal period. Future research should concentrate on developing more unified approaches to vitamin D assessment and establishing preventative measures that can be incorporated into prenatal care programs.
Keywords: asthma, autism, gestational diabetes, low birth weight, preconception vitamin d deficiency, preeclampsia, preterm birth, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d recommendations, vitamin d supplementation
Introduction and background
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is recognized as a worldwide public health concern, despite being preventable [1]. Nutritional guidelines recommend adequate dietary intake of vitamin D; however, many people across various countries still fail to meet the recommended levels [2,3]. This deficiency is particularly prevalent during pregnancy and represents a significant health issue that could have serious implications for the well-being of both women and their offspring; therefore, it is a topic of increasing attention [3-5]. Research indicates that the prevalence of VDD in pregnant women ranges from 26% to 98% in many countries worldwide. Despite the widespread use of prenatal vitamins, deficiency still occurs frequently during the preconception period, pregnancy, and in breastfed infants [6].
Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that is vital for musculoskeletal health and has been recognized to be useful for the prevention and treatment of rickets and osteomalacia [7-9]. In addition to its essential role in maintaining bone health throughout life, vitamin D plays several important roles in immune system development, brain development, cell differentiation, and fetal lung development [10,11]. Several studies highlight the potential role of vitamin D for female fertility, as it stimulates the synthesis of estrogens and progesterone. Furthermore, it is found to play a role in the development of the uterus and endometrium, which is crucial for implantation in the preconception period [12,13].
During pregnancy, the fetus depends entirely on the mother’s vitamin D reservoir, which explains the correlation between mother and cord blood vitamin D concentration [3,14]. Several unfavorable maternal outcomes, including preeclampsia, primary cesarean section, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), are linked to low maternal vitamin D levels throughout pregnancy [6,15-17]. Furthermore, fetal intrauterine development restriction and a number of adverse fetal and neonatal health outcomes, such as an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB), abortion, low birth weight, and neonatal hypocalcemia, have been connected to prenatal VDD [18,19]. Long-term pathologies potentially arising from maternal-fetal VDD include mineralization defects, bronchial asthma, autoimmune and atopic diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders [20,21].
As VDD has been linked to a number of negative health consequences, the best possible pregnancy outcomes and fetal and maternal health all depend on the antenatal vitamin D state [22]. Future studies are needed in order to find practical solutions for raising pregnant women's vitamin D levels. For many pregnant women, vitamin D supplements may be recommended throughout pregnancy, which should serve as the foundation for adjusting public health initiatives aimed at lowering the illness burden and enhancing vitamin D intake for both mothers and infants [23].
The aim of this review is to determine the relationship between prenatal vitamin D and various health outcomes for both the mother and the newborn, as well as to review national recommendations for vitamin D dietary references and supplementation for pregnant and lactating women in European Union countries.
Review
This literature review is developed following the six standard methodologies described by Templier and Paré [24]. A comprehensive study of research papers published in the last ten years was conducted to examine the relationship between maternal vitamin D insufficiency during pregnancy and adverse health outcomes. Our selection included empirical research or conceptual papers that initiated a specific path of investigation, modified the formulation of problems or concerns, introduced innovative methodologies or concepts, or generated substantial discussion. Our study involved an extensive electronic search across several databases, such as Web of Science, MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, covering the period from January to June 2024. The search utilized the designated terms: vitamin D deficiency, preconception vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, preterm birth, low birth weight, asthma, autism, vitamin D recommendations, and pregnancy. Furthermore, we assessed the publications to determine their relevance and to foster impartiality while avoiding prejudices or mistakes. The inclusion criteria specifically targeted research papers, reports, and studies that examined the effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency (VDD) during pregnancy on health outcomes and associated recommendations. These studies included case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, and prospective observational designs. The evaluation approach encompassed the examination of both qualitative and quantitative research, together with the analysis of gray literature. The selected sources encompass official written materials, current recommendations from executive entities, and peer-reviewed journals. The collections consisted of materials in both the English and Bulgarian languages. Included in the exclusion criteria were animal experiments, case reports, and conference articles. Excluded from consideration were papers published before 2014, materials written in languages other than English, and works that did not address vitamin D insufficiency in relation to pregnancy.
Preconception VDD
Research indicates that VDD is prevalent among preconception women, particularly workers and nulliparous women [25,26]. Nevertheless, the majority of study literature has concentrated on vitamin D in individuals who are undergoing assisted reproductive procedures, with few studies examining the influence of preconception vitamin D concentrations on pregnancy outcomes [27]. Vitamin D status is commonly assessed by measuring serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration, with several European organizations, including the European Food Safety Authority, adopting a threshold of 50 nmol/L as a sufficient level [28]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that women with higher 25(OH)D concentrations had a higher likelihood of becoming pregnant [29-31]. In central North Carolina, a study involving 522 fertile women found that those with serum vitamin D levels of at least 50 ng/mL had an estimated 35% increase in fecundability, while those with levels below 20 ng/mL had an estimated 45% decrease in fecundability, which is the likelihood of conception within a month or menstrual cycle [30]. According to a distinct investigation that involved 1191 American women who had previously experienced miscarriages, a higher rate of conception was associated with higher 25(OH)D concentrations [31]. Recent research suggests that the mother's preconception serum 25(OH)D level can be used to predict the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. Additionally, a preconception serum 25(OH)D level of at least 50 nmol/L is associated with an increased likelihood of a successful IVF treatment-related pregnancy [32]. Zhang et al. conducted one of the rare studies to investigate vitamin D and fecundity in both preconception women and males. The growing corpus of research that emphasizes the importance of preconception vitamin D for fertile couples pursuing natural conception is further illustrated by the positive correlation between the increased rate of conception and adequate vitamin D among preconception men. This data also corroborates the necessity of revising and improving pre-pregnancy healthcare guidelines [25]. Additionally, the risk of miscarriage is reduced and the likelihood of delivering a live male infant is increased when preconception vitamin D levels are elevated [33]. Research has established the significance of obtaining an adequate amount of vitamin D daily prior to conception. However, it has also been shown that taking an excessive amount of the vitamin before becoming pregnant may have a detrimental effect on fertility, the quality of embryos, and perinatal outcomes, particularly in women who plan to conceive through assisted reproductive technology, as preconception care is more obtainable to them. Both the cumulative detrimental effects and the advantages of vitamin D should be considered, as it is a fat-soluble vitamin [34,35].
Gestational diabetes mellitus
The chronic pregnancy condition known as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined as hyperglycemia first detected during pregnancy, is prevalent among millions of women globally and is associated with an increased likelihood of complications [36,37]. Research has established a significant connection between VDD and an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus [17]. A clinical experiment conducted on 120 women who were less than 12 weeks pregnant revealed that the administration of 50,000 IU of vitamin D every two weeks had a substantial positive effect on the improvement of insulin resistance [38]. An investigation conducted by Shang et al. found that insufficient levels of 25(OH)D3 serve as a dependable marker for gestational diabetes mellitus. The study revealed a negative association between fasting blood glucose levels during the first trimester and 25(OH)D3 levels [39]. The systematic analysis conducted by Zhang et al. includes 25 randomized controlled trials and 87 observational studies with a total sample size of 55,859 and 2,445 women. The findings of this research suggest that elevated blood vitamin D levels may increase the likelihood of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. The analysis further indicated that the administration of vitamin D supplements during pregnancy could enhance the manifestation of gestational diabetes mellitus [40]. Another analysis found that providing maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to women with varying nutritional status decreases Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) levels but does not affect fasting plasma glucose levels. The recommended dosages range from 200 IU per day to 300,000 IU once [41]. In addition, Sadeghian et al. found that with every 4 ng/mL increase in circulating 25(OH)D, the likelihood of getting GDM decreases by 2%. Moreover, the risk of acquiring GDM in the highest category of 25(OH)D levels is 29% lower compared to the lowest group [42].
Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia, eclampsia, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension with preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension are among the conditions collectively referred to as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), which is characterized by poor blood pressure control throughout pregnancy [6]. Preeclampsia is a highly concerning pregnancy complication, typically manifesting as new-onset hypertension and proteinuria in the third trimester, and can quickly escalate to severe outcomes, including the death of both mother and fetus [43]. Numerous studies have found an association between VDD and preeclampsia [44-46]. Research suggests that patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension often exhibit low vitamin D levels, indicating a higher prevalence of VDD among these individuals and suggesting it as a possible risk factor for the onset of pregnancy-induced hypertension [6]. Moreover, a meta-analysis conducted by Khaing et al., which included 27 randomized controlled studies involving 28,000 women, revealed that the administration of calcium, vitamin D, or a combination of both significantly decreased the likelihood of preeclampsia when compared to a placebo [47]. An analysis conducted by AlSubai et al. examined 34 studies, consisting of 10 randomized controlled trials and 24 observational studies. The findings indicate that low maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of preeclampsia. However, supplementing with 25-hydroxyvitamin D reduces the occurrence of preeclampsia [48]. These results emphasize the possible advantages of vitamin D supplementation in avoiding preeclampsia, indicating that it should be considered as an intervention approach to manage pregnancy-induced hypertension [49,50].
Negative outcomes in newborns and prenatal VDD
Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight
Premature birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks gestation, is the leading cause of death among infants under one-year-old and has been linked to VDD during pregnancy in numerous studies [51]. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene encodes the receptor for vitamin D, which mediates its effects. Variants in VDR lead to differences in vitamin D levels and a higher chance of premature birth [52]. A pregnancy-related 25(OH)D deficit would raise the risk of small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth (PTB), and low birth weight (LBW) [44]. A population-based prospective cohort study conducted in Rotterdam, Netherlands, by Miliku et al. found that mothers with lower 25(OH)D levels had children with increased fetal growth restriction during the third trimester. This restriction led to smaller head circumference, shorter body length, and lower birth weight (all P < 0.05) compared to mothers in the highest quartile. Moreover, those with 25(OH)D levels in the lower quartile had a higher probability of experiencing preterm birth (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.60) and having children that were small for their gestational age [53]. Additionally, maternal VDD greatly raises the likelihood of preterm birth (P = 0.001), whereas a systematic study by Palacios et al. found that pregnant women can get adequate serum vitamin D levels by taking 2000 IU of vitamin D supplements [50]. A comprehensive analysis conducted by Lian et al., comprising of seven cohort studies, 13 case-control studies, and four cross-sectional studies, revealed that it is important to monitor vitamin D levels during the second trimester of pregnancy. If necessary, vitamin D supplements should be provided, as VDD during pregnancy is likely to significantly impact preterm birth mortality [54].
Asthma
Asthma, a prevalent chronic non-communicable disease affecting both children and adults, is characterized by fluctuating respiratory symptoms and intermittent airflow obstruction [55]. According to numerous studies, maternal vitamin D concentration during pregnancy may affect lung development and the likelihood of childhood wheezing and asthma [44,56]. In the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial, pregnant women who were at risk of giving birth to children with asthma were randomized to receive either 4400 international units/d of vitamin D or a placebo + 400 international units/d of vitamin D. Up until age three, asthma and persistent wheezing were recorded. Maternal vitamin D supplementation, especially in mothers with baseline 25(OH)D levels above 30 ng/mL, decreased the incidence of asthma and recurrent wheezing in their children up to the age of three. This suggests that early pregnancy and higher vitamin D status are important for the prevention of asthma and recurrent wheezing in children [57,58]. Grant et al. did a study that found that supplementing with vitamin D3 reduces sensitivity to aeroallergens during pregnancy and very early infancy. The researchers administered either a placebo or one or two daily oral vitamin D doses to pregnant women from 27 weeks of gestation until delivery and thereafter to their infants from birth until six months of age. At 18 months of age, the children underwent an assessment to determine the presence of serum-specific IgE antibodies. Evidence has shown that the administration of vitamin D supplements during pregnancy and in newborns reduces the percentage of children who become sensitive to mites by the age of 18 months. Furthermore, there were variations among the research groups in the proportion of children whose primary care visits involved a medical diagnosis of asthma from their treating physicians [59].
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by impairments in social communication and the presence of restricted, repetitive behaviors or interests [60]. Research has indicated that ASD is associated with vitamin D status. Multiple studies have shown that children and adolescents diagnosed with autism exhibit decreased levels of vitamin D [61-63]. This phenomenon is also exemplified in siblings, where the child with autism exhibits a reduced level of 25(OH)D compared to their siblings [64]. Moreover, a meta-analysis of prospective studies conducted by Wang et al. found that a 54% higher risk of ASD in children was associated with a deficiency in maternal or neonatal vitamin D (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.12; 2.10, p = 0.0071, I2 = 81.2%) [65]. The Netherlands-based prospective cohort study done by Vinkhuyzen et al. aimed to examine the association between prenatal vitamin D levels and the likelihood of developing ASD in children. An analysis of 4334 children and their mothers, out of whom 68 were diagnosed with ASD, revealed that prenatal 25(OH)D insufficiency during mid-gestation is associated with a risk of being diagnosed with ASD that is more than double twice as high. Thus, it may be feasible to decrease the occurrence of autism in children by administering prenatal nutrition in a manner that is both safe and cost-effective [66]. Furthermore, Stubbs et al. presented encouraging findings, indicating that the administration of vitamin D supplements to pregnant women is linked to a reduced probability of their offspring having autism. A dosage of 5000 IU/d of vitamin D3 was administered to pregnant women who had previously had a child with autism. Infants were then given a daily supplementation of vitamin D3 at a dosage of 1000 IU for their first three years of life. This group of children was monitored at the ages of 18 and 36 months. The findings indicated that one in every 19 children, or 5%, had autism, whereas the total likelihood of recurrence was 20% [67].
National recommendations for vitamin D dietary references for pregnant and lactating women in European Union countries
We have compiled a timeline encompassing several European Union countries, which provides the latest guidelines for vitamin D dietary reference values during pregnancy. Our primary focus is on data from Europe, as European populations have similar health behaviors that are influenced by geographical, historical, and cultural factors. The health agencies of each country give these guidelines, which include doses indicated in both International Units (IU) and micrograms (µg) (Table 1).
Table 1. National recommendations for vitamin D dietary references for pregnant and lactating women in European Union countries.
Country | Authority | Recommended dose in IU | Recommended dose in µg |
Austria | DACH a [68] | 800 | 20 |
Belgium | Hoge Gezondheidsraad [68] | 800 | 20 |
Bulgaria | Ministry of Health of Bulgaria [69] | 600 | 15 |
Denmark | Nordic Council of Ministers [68] | 400 | 10 |
Finland | Nordic Council of Ministers [68] | 400 | 10 |
France | ANSES b [70] | 400 | 10 |
Germany | DACH a [71] | 800 | 20 |
Iceland | Nordic Council of Ministers [68] | 400 | 10 |
Ireland | FSAI c [68] | 400 | 10 |
Italy | Ministry of Health of Italy [72] | 400 | 10 |
Netherlands | Health Council of the Netherlands [68] | 400 | 10 |
Norway | Nordic Council of Ministers [68] | 400 | 10 |
Poland | Polish National Food and Nutrition Institute [73] | 600 | 15 |
Spain | Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos [73] | 600 | 15 |
Sweden | Nordic Council of Ministers [68] | 400 | 10 |
Switzerland | DACH a [68] | 800 | 20 |
It is demonstrated that the recommended doses of vitamin D for pregnant women in Europe range from 400 IU (10 µg) to 800 IU (20 µg), with variations reflecting regional differences in sunlight exposure, dietary habits, and health policies. Countries like Germany, Austria, and Belgium recommend higher doses (800 IU) to account for lower sunlight exposure and dietary intake, while others like France, Italy, and the Nordic countries suggest 400 IU. Spain, Poland, and Bulgaria opt for an intermediate dose of 600 IU. These variations underscore the need for tailored public health measures to ensure adequate maternal vitamin D levels across diverse European Union contexts [68-75].
In order to achieve recommended dietary doses of vitamin D, pregnancy multivitamin pills are widely used in most countries but often contain just 200-400 IU of vitamin D. For the majority of people who get enough sun exposure, this dosage is appropriate; however, it is inadequate to address VDD. Several health organizations recommend taking supplements containing at least 400 IU daily and consuming 1,000-2,000 IU daily overall from both food sources and supplements [76].
According to the recommendations of the Ministry of Health in Bulgaria, pregnant women who do not spend enough time outdoors are at risk of VDD; therefore, some women may benefit from supplementing with calcium and vitamin D. The optimal prescribed daily intake of vitamin D for pregnant and breastfeeding women is 15 micrograms or 600 IU. The Bulgarian Society of Endocrinology, however, advises that supplementation with vitamin D in pregnant women should be done under the control of 25(OH)D to maintain optimal levels between 30-50 ng/ml. In cases where measuring the levels of 25(OH)D is not feasible, the suggested daily dosage for pregnant and lactating women is 2000 IU daily [69,75].
Conclusions
Hypovitaminosis D has emerged as a widespread public health issue, particularly for pregnant women due to their increased vulnerability. Numerous studies have shown that it may be crucial for preserving mother-fetal health throughout the prenatal and postnatal phases and preventing negative consequences. Due to its immunomodulatory, skeletal, and calcium regulatory properties, as well as its fertility effects, vitamin D not only improves the prognosis of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and conception rates in mothers, but it also has a direct impact on respiratory disorders, fetal weight at birth, and neonatal neurological development.
Most European Union countries advocate for vitamin D supplementation due to its potential benefits for pregnant and lactating women; however, the recommended dosages vary, which may be due to differences in dietary habits, sunlight exposure, and healthcare strategies.
This review underlines the need for developing more consistent guidelines for vitamin D supplementation and the necessity of official standards for vitamin D intake during the preconception period and throughout pregnancy. Future studies should focus on creating more standardized methods for assessing vitamin D levels and on creating preventative strategies in order to improve public health initiatives that support healthy pregnancies and pregnancy outcomes.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under the national Program” Young Scientists and Postdoctoral Students-2”.
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Lilia Tsenkova-Toncheva, Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova, Georgi Iskrov, Rumen Stefanov
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Lilia Tsenkova-Toncheva, Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova, Georgi Iskrov, Rumen Stefanov
Drafting of the manuscript: Lilia Tsenkova-Toncheva, Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova, Georgi Iskrov, Rumen Stefanov
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lilia Tsenkova-Toncheva, Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova, Georgi Iskrov, Rumen Stefanov
Supervision: Georgi Iskrov, Rumen Stefanov
References
- 1.Preventing vitamin D deficiency (VDD): a systematic review of economic evaluations. Aguiar M, Andronis L, Pallan M, Högler W, Frew E. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27:292–301. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem? Palacios C, Gonzalez L. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144 Pt A:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The role of vitamin D in fertility and during pregnancy and lactation: a review of clinical data. Pilz S, Zittermann A, Obeid R, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and its impact on the fetus, the newborn and in childhood (Article in Portuguese) Urrutia-Pereira M, Solé D. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015;33:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.rpped.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vitamin D deficiency and supplementation in pregnancy in a multiethnic population-based cohort. Eggemoen ÅR, Falk RS, Knutsen KV, Lagerløv P, Sletner L, Birkeland KI, Jenum AK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0796-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Relationship between maternal vitamin D levels and adverse outcomes. Zhang H, Wang S, Tuo L, Zhai Q, Cui J, Chen D, Xu D. Nutrients. 2022;14:4230. doi: 10.3390/nu14204230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin D: current evidence and outstanding questions. Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, et al. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:1109–1151. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nutritional rickets and osteomalacia in the twenty-first century: revised concepts, public health, and prevention strategies. Uday S, Högler W. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15:293–302. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0383-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:394–415. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vitamin D and its impact on maternal-fetal outcomes in pregnancy: a critical review. Agarwal S, Kovilam O, Agrawal DK. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58:755–769. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1220915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Curtis EM, Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C. Br Med Bull. 2018;126:57–77. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vitamin D and aspects of female fertility. Voulgaris N, Papanastasiou L, Piaditis G, Angelousi A, Kaltsas G, Mastorakos G, Kassi E. Hormones (Athens) 2017;16:5–21. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Effects of vitamin D supplementation on ovulation and pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yang M, Shen X, Lu D, Peng J, Zhou S, Xu L, Zhang J. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1148556. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Estimation of the maternal vitamin D intake that maintains circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D in late gestation at a concentration sufficient to keep umbilical cord sera ≥25-30 nmol/L: a dose-response, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial in pregnant women at northern latitude. O'Callaghan KM, Hennessy Á, Hull GL, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108:77–91. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Associations of maternal vitamin D deficiency with pregnancy and neonatal complications in developing countries: a systematic review. van der Pligt P, Willcox J, Szymlek-Gay EA, Murray E, Worsley A, Daly RM. Nutrients. 2018;10:640. doi: 10.3390/nu10050640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in burka-clad pregnant women in a 450-bedded maternity hospital of Delhi. Ajmani SN, Paul M, Chauhan P, Ajmani AK, Yadav N. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66:67–71. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0764-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Milajerdi A, Abbasi F, Mousavi SM, Esmaillzadeh A. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:2576–2586. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vitamin D and miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tamblyn JA, Pilarski NS, Markland AD, et al. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Assessment of correlation between vitamin D level and prevalence of preterm births in the population of pregnant women in Poland. Baczyńska-Strzecha M, Kalinka J. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017;30:933–941. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vitamin D deficiency and autism spectrum disorder. Siracusano M, Riccioni A, Abate R, Benvenuto A, Curatolo P, Mazzone L. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26:2460–2474. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200415174311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vitamin D, neurosteroids and autism. Máčová L, Bičíková M, Ostatníková D, Hill M, Stárka L. Physiol Res. 2017;66:0–40. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Impact of vitamin D on maternal and fetal health: a review. Arshad R, Sameen A, Murtaza MA, et al. Food Sci Nutr. 2022;10:3230–3240. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: an overview. Pérez-López FR, Pilz S, Chedraui P. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32:316–321. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Тemplier M, Paré G. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2015;37 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Serum vitamin D concentrations, time to pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes among preconception couples: a cohort study in Shanghai, China. Zhang Y, Jukic AM, Song H, et al. Nutrients. 2022;14:3058. doi: 10.3390/nu14153058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels and affecting factors among preconception fertile women. Fan H, Hui L, Yan X, Hou W, Bai E, Wang L, Yu X. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20:146. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01018-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vitamin D and assisted reproductive treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chu J, Gallos I, Tobias A, Tan B, Eapen A, Coomarasamy A. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:65–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.25-hydroxyvitamin D as a biomarker of vitamin D status and its modeling to inform strategies for prevention of vitamin D deficiency within the population. Cashman KD, van den Heuvel EG, Schoemaker RJ, Prévéraud DP, Macdonald HM, Arcot J. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:947–957. doi: 10.3945/an.117.015578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Association of vitamin D intake and serum levels with fertility: results from the Lifestyle and Fertility Study. Fung JL, Hartman TJ, Schleicher RL, Goldman MB. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pre-conception 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and fecundability. Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, McConnaughey DR, Steiner AZ. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:2163–2172. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Association of preconception serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with livebirth and pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study. Mumford SL, Garbose RA, Kim K, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:725–732. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30153-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Preconception vitamin D level and in vitro fertilization: pregnancy outcome. Hasan HA, Barber TM, Cheaib S, Coussa A. Endocr Pract. 2023;29:235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.The role of maternal preconception vitamin D status in human offspring sex ratio. Purdue-Smithe AC, Kim K, Nobles C, et al. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2789. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23083-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Preconception vitamin D intake and obstetric outcomes in women using assisted reproductive technology: the Japan Environment and Children's Study. Kyozuka H, Murata T, Fukuda T, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:542. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04861-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vitamin D in human reproduction: the more, the better? An evidence-based critical appraisal. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Frangež HB, Vrtačnik-Bokal E, D’Anna R. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/13444. PubMed. 2017;21:4243–4251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.The pathophysiology of destational diabetes mellitus. Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, Reynolds CM, Vickers MH. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3342. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, Liu Z, Liu F. BMJ. 2022;377:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lower vitamin D levels at first trimester are associated with higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Lacroix M, Battista MC, Doyon M, et al. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:609–616. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0564-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Early pregnancy vitamin D insufficiency and gestational diabetes mellitus. Shang M, Zhao N. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48:2353–2362. doi: 10.1111/jog.15333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review based on data free of Hawthorne effect. Zhang Y, Gong Y, Xue H, Xiong J, Cheng G. BJOG. 2018;125:784–793. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: an evidence analysis Center systematic review and meta-analysis. Gallo S, McDermid JM, Al-Nimr RI, et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020;120:898–924. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Circulating vitamin D and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Sadeghian M, Asadi M, Rahmani S, Akhavan Zanjani M, Sadeghi O, Hosseini SA, Zare Javid A. Endocrine. 2020;70:36–47. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02360-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Circ Res. 2019;124:1094–1112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vitamin D: Before, during and after Pregnancy: effect on neonates and children. Mansur JL, Oliveri B, Giacoia E, Fusaro D, Costanzo PR. Nutrients. 2022;14:1900. doi: 10.3390/nu14091900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Holick MF. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:153–165. doi: 10.1007/s11154-017-9424-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Egyptian patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Osman OM, Gaafar T, Eissa TS, Abdella R, Ebrashy A, Ellithy A. J Perinat Med. 2020;48:583–588. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Calcium and vitamin D supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Khaing W, Vallibhakara SA, Tantrakul V, et al. Nutrients. 2017;9:1141. doi: 10.3390/nu9101141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vitamin D and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AlSubai A, Baqai MH, Agha H, et al. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231212093. doi: 10.1177/20503121231212093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vitamin D supplementation and incident preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Fogacci S, Fogacci F, Banach M, et al. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:1742–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Palacios C, Kostiuk LK, Peña-Rosas JP. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Evidence of an association between vitamin D deficiency and preterm birth and preeclampsia: a critical review. Woo J, Giurgescu C, Wagner CL. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64:613–629. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Association between vitamin D plasma concentrations and VDR gene variants and the risk of premature birth. Dutra LV, Affonso-Kaufman FA, Cafeo FR, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;20:3. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2671-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Maternal vitamin D concentrations during pregnancy, fetal growth patterns, and risks of adverse birth outcomes. Miliku K, Vinkhuyzen A, Blanken LM, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1514–1522. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Systematic review and meta-analysis of vitamin D deficiency in different pregnancy on preterm birth: deficiency in middle pregnancy might be at risk. Lian RH, Qi PA, Yuan T, et al. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Asthma. Papi A, Brightling C, Pedersen SE, et al. The Lancet. 2018;391:783–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33311-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Relationship between vitamin D and asthma from gestational to adulthood period: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sobczak M, Pawliczak R. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23:212. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02514-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Prenatal vitamin D supplementation reduces risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze in early childhood: a combined analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Wolsk HM, Chawes BL, Litonjua AA, et al. PLoS One. 2017;12:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy, prenatal 25(OH)D levels, race, and subsequent asthma or recurrent wheeze in offspring: secondary analyses from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Wolsk HM, Harshfield BJ, Laranjo N, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:1423–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and infancy reduces aeroallergen sensitization: a randomized controlled trial. Grant CC, Crane J, Mitchell EA, et al. Allergy. 2016;71:1325–1334. doi: 10.1111/all.12909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Autism spectrum disorder: a review. Hirota T, King BH. JAMA. 2023;329:157–168. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Iron and vitamin D levels among autism spectrum disorders children. Bener A, Khattab AO, Bhugra D, Hoffmann GF. Ann Afr Med. 2017;16:186–191. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_17_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Biochemical assessments of thyroid profile, serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and cluster of differentiation 5 expression levels among children with autism. Desoky T, Hassan MH, Fayed HM, Sakhr HM. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:2397–2403. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S146152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Correlation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder in children (Article in Chinese) Dong HY, Wang B, Li HH, Shan L, Jia FY. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017;55:916–919. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Autism spectrum disorder and low vitamin D at birth: a sibling control study. Fernell E, Bejerot S, Westerlund J, et al. Mol Autism. 2015;6:3. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-6-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.The association between vitamin D status and autism spectrum disorder (ASD): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang Z, Ding R, Wang J. Nutrients. 2020;13:86. doi: 10.3390/nu13010086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gestational vitamin D deficiency and autism spectrum disorder. Vinkhuyzen AA, Eyles DW, Burne TH, et al. BJPsych Open. 2017;3:85–90. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Autism: will vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and early childhood reduce the recurrence rate of autism in newborn siblings? Stubbs G, Henley K, Green J. Med Hypotheses. 2016;88:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vitamin D: an overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Spiro A, Buttriss JL. Nutr Bull. 2014;39:322–350. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ministry of Health. Regulation No. 1 of 22 January 2018 on the physiological norms of nutrition for the population (Article in Bulgarian) Sofia, Bulgaria: Ministry of Health; 2018. Ordinance No. 1 on the physiological norms for the nutrition of the population. [Google Scholar]
- 70.French prenatal Vitamin D recommended supplementation: enough or not? Ceccaldi PF, Pejoan H, Breau N, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Diet and lifestyle before and during pregnancy - practical recommendations of the Germany-Wide Healthy Start - Young Family Network. Koletzko B, Cremer M, Flothkötter M, et al. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78:1262–1282. doi: 10.1055/a-0713-1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dietary habits and supplement use in relation to national pregnancy recommendations: data from the EuroPrevall birth cohort. Oliver EM, Grimshaw KE, Schoemaker AA, et al. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:2408–2425. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1480-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nutrient Intake among pregnant women in Spain and Poland: a comparative analysis. Iglesias-Vázquez L, Suliburska J, Kocyłowski R, Bakinowska E, Arija V. Nutrients. 2023;15:3225. doi: 10.3390/nu15143225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Determinants of dietary vitamin D intake in population-based cohort sample of Polish female adolescents. Lachowicz K, Stachoń M. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:12184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency . Bulgarian Society of Endocrinology. https://endo-bg.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/vitamin-D.pdf Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency (Article in Bulgarian) 2019
- 76.Maternal and foetal health implications of vitamin D status during pregnancy. Larqué E, Morales E, Leis R, Blanco-Carnero JE. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;72:179–192. doi: 10.1159/000487370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]