Skip to main content
Radiology Case Reports logoLink to Radiology Case Reports
. 2024 Oct 3;19(12):6667–6670. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.081

Conservative approach of ascending aortic dissection after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A case report

Danna Sarmiento-Dickson a,⁎, Maria Camila Sánchez-Chica a, Gipsy Shaik-Polo a, Laura Velásquez-Zora a, Carlos González-Lengua b
PMCID: PMC11489124  PMID: 39430224

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown good early and midterm results from high risk to low surgical risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Despite low adverse events, TAVR is associated with vascular injury, bleeding, stroke, and conduction system disturbances as the most common adverse events. Aortic dissection is a relatively rare but potentially lethal complication from TAVR. Here, we report a case of ascending aortic dissection (type A) complicating TAVR that was managed conservatively with complete resolution of the complication noted on serial computed tomography angiogram.

Keywords: TAVR, Aortic dissection, CT-A, Selfresolving, Anticoagulant

Case presentation

An 80-year-old female with a history of severe aortic stenosis presented with progressive dyspnea on exertion. The patient has history hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypercoagulable state due to genetic mutation of prothrombin with multiple episodes of pulmonary embolisms treated with anticoagulation for which she is on chronic Rivaroxaban therapy. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed a tricuspid aortic valve area of 0.8 cm, mean gradient of 42 mmHg consistent with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Computed tomography angiogram (CT-A) TAVR revealed a severely restricted aortic valve with significant calcification of the ascending aorta, including the sinotubular junction with calcium protruding to the aortic lumen more prominent in the outer curvature (Fig. 1). The calcium score for the aortic valve was 1059 HU. The procedure was performed under moderate sedation using a femoral access, a 26 mm Evolut FX Valve ™ was used for the procedure as per the patient TAVR-CTA measurements, overall the procedure was uneventful, but while passing the valve catheter through the ascending aorta outer curvature mild resistance was noted but it was easily overcome with changing angulation and mild forward push. TTE showed no regurgitation, and the mean gradient was 5 mmHg. The patient had an unremarkable hospital stay: she was discharged home after 2 days and Rivaroxaban was restarted the day after the procedure.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Pre TAVR CT-A showing areas of severe calcification in the aorta outer curvature.

One week postoperative, the patient arrived at the ER with symptoms suggestive of pneumonia so chest CT was performed (Fig. 2). Incidentally aortic dissection starting above the right coronary sinus and extending to above the aortic arch was noted (it did not involve the arch branches) (Fig. 3). After heart team discussion the decision was to proceed with conservative management reversion rivaroxaban with Feiba, and tight blood pressure control in ICU with close monitoring since the patient was considered not to be a surgical candidate.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Alveolointersticial infiltrates with bilateral mosaicism in relation to pneumonia.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

(A) Sagittal view of post-TAVR changes, intramural hematoma in relation to aortic dissection. (B) Axial view of post-TAVR changes, intramural hematoma in relation to aortic dissection.

During the initial treatment, minimal changes in the aortic dissection were observed on serial CT-As, with the patient being asymptomatic and maintaining appropriate blood pressures; she was discharged home after 5 days in the hospital and anticoagulation was held for a total of 2 weeks. Two weeks after resuming anticoagulation the patient remained asymptomatic, a follow-up CT scan shows a considerable increase in the aortic dissection (Fig. 4), leading to the decision to discontinue anticoagulation indefinitely.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Axial view showing an increase in mural hematoma related to aortic dissection following the initiation of anticoagulant therapy.

The patient continues with strict blood pressure control. Subsequently follow-up CT scans showed stable findings that later improved to a complete healing and resolution of dissection 4 months after (Fig. 5, Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

(A) Sagittal view of improvement of the aortic dissection after discontinuation of anticoagulant. (B and C) Axial view of improvement of the aortic dissection after discontinuation of anticoagulant.

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

(A and B) Axial view of lumen of thrombosed aortic dissection with progressively resorption, with intact true lumen. (C and D) Axial and sagittal view of complete resorption of the false lumen with resolution of the aortic dissection.

Discussion

According to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), patients with severe aortic stenosis older than 75 years with high risk for open surgery (STS PROM/EuroSCORE II greater than 8%) are candidates for TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) [1]. Although it is a safer procedure, there is also a risk of complications.

Aortic dissection as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a rare event; an incidence of up to 1.9% has been reported in the literature [2]. Among the risk factors for post-TAVR aortic dissection, we have those that are inherent to the patient such as advanced age, female sex, atherosclerosis, aortic wall weakening (secondary to steroid or immunomodulator use) [3] and those inherent to the procedure such as aggressive balloon valvuloplasty, difficult placement of the artificial valve in position and large size of the transcatheter valve [4].

ESC guidelines on aortic pathology describe that treatment of iatrogenic aortic dissection is usually conservative [5], but to date, there are no evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate management of aortic dissection following TAVR, thus, each patient must be individualized according to his or her history, clinical condition, and prognosis in order to choose between surgery or conservative treatment.

Medical management is based on blood pressure and heart rate control with close follow-up and it is frequently chosen in uncomplicated dissections. But in case of imminent rupture, uncontrolled pain or inadequate perfusion, either endovascular or open surgical management should be considered [6].

To our knowledge this is the first case reported of the evolution of an iatrogenic ascending aortic dissection from the onset to the complete resolution. The mechanism of spontaneous resolution remains unclear. In our case, probably with the suspension of anticoagulant therapy, the intramural hematoma thrombosed, stabilized and reabsorbed, resulting in resolution of the dissection.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Patient consent

We certify that I have obtained the patient's written informed consent for publication. This document ensures that a clear explanation of the purpose of the publication has been provided, and that the patient has voluntarily and knowingly consented to the publication.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Cleveland Clinic Hospital Indian River for enabling a positive research and academic environment during the writing process of this manuscript. The authors have received no funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;43(7):584–587. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G, Berkowitsch A, Kötting J, Mangner N, et al. Perioperative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve replacements: prospective data from the GARY Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet] 2015;65(20):2173–2180. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.034. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25787198/ [Accessed September 26, 2022]Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mach M, Okutucu S, Kerbel T, Arjomand A, Fatihoglu SG, Werner P, et al. Vascular complications in TAVR: incidence, clinical impact, and management. J Clin Med [Internet] 2021;10(21):5046. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215046. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584339/ Available from: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miha S, Rok Z, Nikola L, Matjaz B. Aortic dissection after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conservative approach with good outcome. J Clin Case Rep. 2018;08(01) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J [Internet] 2014;35(41):2873–2926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25173340 Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rujirachun P, Junyavoraluk A, Jakrapanichakul D, Wongpraparut N, Chunhamaneewat N, Maneesai A, et al. Immediate aortic dissection after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(7):5. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES