Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Sep 30;10(19):e38608. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38608

ANXA3 as a novel biomarker for sepsis diagnosis: Evidence from integrative WGCNA analysis

Jing-Xiang Zhang a,b,1, Xin-Hao Xing a,c,1, Ren-Yi Lu a, Meng-Xiao Liu a,d, Wei-Heng Xu a, Hao-Cheng Zhang e, Qing-Jie Zhao a, Yan Wang a,
PMCID: PMC11490821  PMID: 39430518

Abstract

Sepsis is a dysregulated immune response to infection that comes with multiple organ dysfunction and high mortality. The management of sepsis relies heavily on early recognition and diagnosis, but current diagnostic methods have limitations in timeliness, sensitivity, and discriminability. This study aims to discover novel biomarkers for sepsis diagnosis. Four datasets from different regions were analyzed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and genes with high Gene Significance values across these datasets were overlapped. Finally, two genes, CD177 and ANXA3, were identified. ANXA3 was validated as a potential sepsis biomarker by checking multiple datasets and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis. Of note, ANXA3 could distinguish not only between adult and child sepsis patients and healthy controls, but also between septic shock and cardiogenic shock. Moreover, a murine sepsis model was established and the results showed that the transcription of ANXA3 in peripheral blood of septic mice was significantly higher than that of healthy controls, while Escherichia coli infection alone did not significantly increase the transcription level of this gene. Subsequent studies of sepsis in mice revealed that the predictive effect of Anxa3 on sepsis could be observed as early as 6 h post-modeling. Interestingly, ANXA3 expression was predominantly up-regulated in myeloid cells, up-regulated in spleen, down-regulated in lung, and not detected in liver after sepsis modeling. Taken together, this study provides a way for the discovery of biomarkers and finds that ANXA3 may be a novel diagnostic biomarker for sepsis.

Keywords: Sepsis, Biomarker, ANXA3, Bioinformatic analysis, Weighted gene Co-Expression network analysis (WGCNA)

1. Introduction

Sepsis is defined as multiple organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated immune response to infection with potentially fatal results [1]. It is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and was listed as a global health priority by the World Health Organization in 2017 [2]. According to a meta-analysis of 45 studies from 18 developed countries, there were 288 (95 % CI, 215–386) cases of sepsis per 100,000 people per year [3]. From 2006 to 2016, there were cumulatively 31.5 million cases of sepsis and 19.4 million cases of severe sepsis worldwide [3]. Another meta-analysis of 170 studies covering 371,937 patients reported a mean 30-day mortality rate of 24.4 % (95 % CI 21.5–27.2 %) and a mean 90-day mortality rate of 32.2 % (95 % CI 27.0–37.5 %) for sepsis [4]. Therefore, sepsis remains a serious public health problem and greatly threatens the quality of life and survival of hospitalized patients.

In 2016, at the 45th Annual Meeting of Critical Care Medicine, the American Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the European Society of Critical Care Medicine (ESICM) jointly issued the definition and diagnostic criteria for Sepsis 3.0. The definition of Sepsis 3.0 focuses on organ dysfunction and introduces the retrospective diagnostic criteria of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA). However, over the years, the use of SOFA and qSOFA standards has been called into question due to the delays in diagnosis and treatment they might cause [5]. Moreover, only 48 % of SOFA scores were fully in agreement with gold standard assessment, indicating the unreliability of this criteria [6]. Due to the poor sensitivity and specificity of existing biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), researchers are also working to find new biomarkers to facilitate rapid clinical diagnosis and risk prediction [7]. More specifically, the diagnostic sensitivity of CRP for sepsis is 0.75 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.79), and the corresponding specificity is 0.67 (95 % CI, 0.58–0.74) [8]. As for PCT, the sensitivity is 0.77 and the specificity is 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.72–0.81 and 0.74–0.81) [8]. The sensitivity and specificity of CRP and PCT are not satisfactory.

Bioinformatic methods can provide clues for discovering novel biomarkers. In the past few decades, whole-genome analyses such as high-throughput sequencing and microarray have been widely used in the study of gene expression patterns, and massive data were generated in these processes. This has led to the development of new data analysis methods and algorithms, such as Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) [9], which has proven to be an effective method for biomarker discovery [10,11].

In this study, we used the WGCNA algorithm to analyze gene expression profiles of datasets from different regions. ANXA3 was finally identified and further validated as a potential biomarker. In the context of extensive research on sepsis biomarkers worldwide [12], ANXA3's significance as a marker for the clinical management of sepsis goes beyond mere diagnostic enhancement. Its capacity to discriminate septic shock from cardiogenic shock introduces a new dimension to sepsis diagnosis, promising to streamline therapeutic interventions and improve patient outcomes. Unlike conventional biomarkers that primarily reflect inflammation or organ dysfunction in a nonspecific manner, ANXA3's distinct expression pattern in myeloid cells implicates its involvement in the intricate immunological responses underlying sepsis pathology. This mechanism insight not only strengthens its credibility in diagnosis but also paves a way for targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating ANXA3-related pathways.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Data collection

Datasets of gene expression profiles GSE8121, GSE13015, GSE26378, GSE26440, GSE28750, GSE57065, GSE60424, GSE65682, GSE95233, GSE131411, GSE131761, GSE134347, GSE145227, GSE154918 and GSE167363 were downloaded from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Datasets (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/). The details of the datasets were shown. (Table 1).

Table 1.

The details of the datasets used in this study.

Dataset ID Method Platform Number of sepsis samples Number of healthy control samples Remarks
Peripheral Blood of Sepsis Patients vs. Healthy Controls
GSE8121 Microarray GPL570 60 15 Pediatric
GSE13015 Microarray GPL6106 29 5
GSE26378 Microarray GPL570 82 21 Pediatric
GSE26440 Microarray GPL570 98 32 Pediatric
GSE28750 Microarray GPL570 10 20
GSE57065 Microarray GPL570 26 20
GSE60424 RNA Sequencing GPL15456 3 4
GSE65682 Microarray GPL13667 51 42
GSE95233 Microarray GPL570 51 22
GSE134347 Microarray GPL17586 156 83
GSE145227 Microarray GPL23178 10 12 Pediatric
GSE154918 RNA Sequencing GPL20301 39 40
GSE167363 Single cell RNA Sequencing GPL24676 10 2
Peripheral Blood of Sepsis Patients vs. Control Patients
GSE131761 Microarray GPL13497 81 15
Peripheral Blood of Septic Shock Patients vs. Non-septic Shock Patients
GSE131411 RNA Sequencing GPL10999
GPL16791
63 33

2.2. Construction of weighted correlation network and detection of co-expression modules

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) is an R package that can build a gene co-expression network from large amounts of genes and identify co-expression modules [9]. The WGCNA algorithm was used to analyze the gene expression matrices of GSE28750, GSE57065, GSE134347, and GSE65682. The samples were first clustered according to the gene expression profiles to eliminate the outliers. The network was then made to correspond to the power-law distribution that simulated the actual biological network state by setting a soft threshold [13]. To group genes with similar expression patterns, the scale-free network was lastly built using the “blockwiseModules” function, then the module partitioning analysis was performed to discover gene co-expression modules based on the topological overlap.

2.3. Identification of clinically related genes

The foremost principal component of each module was calculated as a synthetic gene (Module eigengene, ME), representing the expression profiles of all genes in this module [14]. Next, the correlation between MEs and clinical traits (diagnosed with sepsis or healthy) for all modules was calculated. Then, to determine which genes are most correlated with sepsis, the gene-trait significance (GS) value was calculated by Person's correlation for each gene in each dataset, and the common genes with high values were finally found across the four datasets using Venn's diagrams on Venny 2.1 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html).

2.4. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis

ROC curves were plotted for 9 datasets including GSE95233, GSE154918, GSE13015, GSE60424, GSE131761, GSE8121, GSE26378, GSE26440, and GSE145227. The R package “pROC” was used to evaluate the performance of the biomarkers based on specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, the area under curve (AUC) values were calculated for selected genes to assess their diagnostic potential as biomarkers.

2.5. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis

The single-cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE167363 on the GEO platform were used for analysis. After downloading the Raw Count matrix of this dataset, sample integration, quality control, and re-clustering were performed. The Harmony method was used to correct for batch effects and the Seurat package were used for data normalization, dimensionality reduction, and clustering. Subsequently, each cluster were annotated based on reference marker genes of cell types.

2.6. Animals

Female C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old), weighing 18–22 g, were purchased from the SLAC Laboratory Animal Company (Shanghai, China) and used in all experiments. The rearing humidity of mice was about 55 %, and the temperature was 20–22 °C. Mice were given free access to food and water. Moreover, light or dark environments were given according to their circadian rhythm.

2.7. Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-Induced sepsis

The poly-microbial sepsis was induced by CLP as previously described [15]. Briefly, the mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital solution. The concentration of the sodium pentobarbital solution is 0.5 %, and the dosage is 100 injections per 10g body weight intraperitoneally. Hair on the surgical area was removed with Veet® Depilatory Cream (Reckitt Benckiser, Beijing, China) and the area was cleaned and disinfected by alcohol cotton balls. A midline incision was made to obtain access to the cecum, which was then exposed, ligated, and punctured with a 22-gauge needle. The location of the ligation is at the midpoint of the cecum. The cecum was put back in place before the incision was closed. The peritoneum and skin were sutured separately. Povidone-iodine was used for post-operative disinfection. After these steps, the mouse was immediately resuscitated by normal saline at 37 °C (1 ml in total per 20 g body weight) subcutaneously at the root of both thighs. Besides, appropriate measures were taken to alleviate the pain of mice. All mice were covered with cotton for warmth after surgery. Sham-operated animals underwent anaesthetization, incision, exposure, and suture, but without cecal ligation and puncture. After 6,12, or 24 h of CLP or sham operation, the peripheral blood of each mouse was collected using heparin sodium anticoagulant tubes. The sample size of each group was 4.

2.8. Escherichia coli-induced infection

The Escherichia coli (E. coli)-induced intra-abdominal infection was induced by injection as previously described [16]. Briefly, the mice were infected by intraperitoneal injection of 1 × 107 CFU of E. coli strain DH5α in 0.2 mL of PBS. After 24 h of infection, the peripheral blood of each mouse was collected as described above.

2.9. RNA Extraction, reverse transcription, and quantitative real-time PCR

The Red Blood Cell Lysis Buffer (Biosharp, Hefei, China) was used to prepare suspensions of white blood cells from peripheral blood for subsequent experiments. Total RNA was extracted using the RNA Fast 200 Kit (Fastagen, Shanghai, China). Then the Hifair® Ⅲ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) was used for reverse transcription. Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted with the Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) and StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific, Massachusetts, United States). It is worth noting that before starting the machine, the sealing film must be tightly covered to maintain sealing. All experimental procedures were performed following the manufacturer's recommendations. The Gapdh gene was used as an endogenous reference. Specific amplification was ensured by observing the dissolution curves. The primer sequences of Anxa3 and Gapdh were as follows. Anxa3: forward GACTTGGGACTGACGAGAAAAC; reverse CCACCATGACGTGCTCGAA. Gapdh: forward TCACCATCTTCCAGGAGCGAGAC; reverse AGACACCAGTAGACTCCACGACATAC.

2.10. Immunohistochemistry

Mouse organs were harvested and sectioned 24 h after the sepsis modeling. Then the tissue sections were deparaffinized with Xylene for 3 times, and rehydrated with gradient ethanol, and antigen retrieval was performed by heating the tissue sections in 0.01 M (pH 6.0) citrate buffer in a microwave oven. 3 % H2O2 was then used for blocking endogenous peroxidase. Next, the ANXA3 primary antibody (AF5159, Affinity Biosciences, Shanghai, China, 1:100 dilution) was dropped into the sections, and they were incubated overnight at 4 °C. After three times of washing, the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (S0001, Affinity Biosciences, Shanghai, China, 1:200 dilution) was added and incubated at 25 °C for 60 min, followed by diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. Then hematoxylin (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used for counterstaining and inverted microscopes were used to take pictures for these sections.

2.11. Flow cytometry

The spleen, thymus, peripheral blood, and peritoneal lavage fluid of the mice were collected 24 h after the sepsis modeling. The spleen and thymus were ground into single-cell suspensions. For the peripheral blood and spleen, red blood cells were lysed as described above.

The cells were washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing 5 % fetal bovine serum. Then the Fc receptors on the cells were blocked for 15 min by the Purified Rat Anti-Mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (Catalog No:553142, BD Biosciences, New Jersey, US, 1:25 dilution). The cells were next resuspended in 200 μL of PBS and antibodies were added according to their instructions. Then, cells were collected, washed with PBS containing 5 % fetal bovine serum, and collected for testing. For secondary antibody staining, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, then they were collected and washed with PBS containing 5 % fetal bovine serum before testing.

The sources of antibodies were as follows: BV421-conjugated anti-mouse CD19 antibody (Catalog No: A14905, 1:250 dilution), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody(Catalog No: 17-0032-82, 1:250 dilution), PE-conjugated anti-mouse Ly6G antibody (Catalog No: 12-9668-82, 1:250 dilution), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b antibody (Catalog No: 11-0112-82, 1:250 dilution) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (Catalog No: 11-4801-82, 1:250 dilution) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US. Rabbit-anti-mouse ANXA3 primary antibody (Catalog No: AF5159, 1:100 dilution), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Catalog No: S0018, 1:133 dilution), Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Catalog No: S0006, 1:133 dilution) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Catalog No: S0013, 1:133 dilution) were purchased from Affinity Biosciences, Shanghai, China.

2.12. Data analysis

Data of quantitative real-time PCR was processed by 2^(–delta delta Ct) method [17]. The immunohistochemistry results were processed using ImageJ software. The flow cytometry results were processed using FlowJo software. Then these data were analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism. After confirming the normality distribution and homogeneity of variance, unpaired t-tests were performed. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Weighted gene Co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and screening for clinically related modules and genes

The NCBI GEO database was utilized to obtain gene expression profile datasets in the peripheral blood of septic patients. Four datasets (GSE28750, GSE57065, GSE65682, and GSE134347) representing different populations from France, the United States, the Netherlands, and Malta were obtained from the GEO database. Gene expression matrices of these four datasets were analyzed by the WGCNA R package. Gene modules, representing groups of genes with similar patterns of expression, were calculated for each dataset. Moreover, the hierarchical clustering dendrogram for each dataset was plotted and each module was assigned a unique color (Fig. 1A–D). These dendrograms and modules reflected the co-expression status of genes in the whole blood of patients, which may have potential values for revealing the pathological mechanisms of sepsis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clustering dendrograms of genes, based on the topological overlap, together with assigned module colors for the four datasets using the WGCNA algorithm. For each dataset, modules were constructed and were shown in different colors. WGCNA: Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis.

Gene Significance (GS) is defined as the absolute value of the Pearson correlation coefficient between a gene and the clinical diagnosis in the WGCNA algorithm, which was used to quantify the correlation between them. GS values of all genes in the 4 datasets were calculated to evaluate the correlation between each gene and sepsis diagnosis. The top 15 genes with the highest values were selected in each dataset (Table 2). The top 15 genes in GSE28750 included MCEMP1, S100A12, RETN, PLBD1, S100A9, HP, CYSTM1, CD177, ANXA3, CLEC4D, TLR5, GPR84, MS4A6A, RAB13, and USB1. The top 15 genes in GSE57065 included IRAK3, MCEMP1, TLR5, ANXA3, S100A9, SLC26A8, GRB10, PLBD1, RNASE2, FCAR, CD177, PGS1, GYG1, AGTRAP, and BCL6. The top 15 genes in GSE65682 included C19orf59, CD177, GADD45A, ARG1, CLEC4D, C5orf32, GYG1, HK3, UPP1, RGL4, ANXA3, SERPINB1, IRAK3, FCAR, and GPR84. The top 15 genes in GSE134347 included C19orf59, ANXA3, S100A8, S100A9, CD177P1, GYG1, CD177, MAPK14, CLEC4D, HMGB2, IRAK3, CR1L, TLR5, ARG1, and METTL9.

Table 2.

The top 15 genes with the highest GS values for GSE28750, GSE57065, GSE65682, and GSE134347 were analyzed by WGCNA.

Dataset ID Gene Name GS Value Gene Name GS Value
GSE28750 MCEMP1 0.961131 ANXA3 0.9147
S100A12 0.946505 CLEC4D 0.91292
RETN 0.932495 TLR5 0.912155
PLBD1 0.931995 GPR84 0.911295
S100A9 0.930776 MS4A6A 0.909924
HP 0.926046 RAB13 0.908034
CYSTM1 0.917831 USB1 0.908929
CD177 0.915821
GSE57065 IRAK3 0.941714 RNASE2 0.900972
MCEMP1 0.940526 FCAR 0.900401
TLR5 0.929993 CD177 0.89784
ANXA3 0.922709 PGS1 0.897277
S100A9 0.909233 GYG1 0.896734
SLC26A8 0.906817 AGTRAP 0.895421
GRB10 0.903617 BCL6 0.893732
PLBD1 0.902745
GSE65682 C19orf59 0.977931 UPP1 0.962505
CD177 0.969728 RGL4 0.959306
GADD45A 0.969718 ANXA3 0.958931
ARG1 0.96606 SERPINB1 0.957891
CLEC4D 0.965557 IRAK3 0.95718
C5orf32 0.963431 FCAR 0.956853
GYG1 0.963403 GPR84 0.954416
HK3 0.963181
GSE134347 C19orf59 0.94364 CLEC4D 0.901065
ANXA3 0.925584 HMGB2 0.900694
S100A8 0.918015 IRAK3 0.897906
S100A9 0.917185 CR1L 0.895963
CD177P1 0.912387 TLR5 0.895031
GYG1 0.90751 ARG1 0.893785
CD177 0.902363 METTL9 0.892966
MAPK14 0.901566

Next, the overlapped genes in the four results were found using Venn's diagram. It can be seen that there were two genes, ANXA3 and CD177, shared by the four results (Fig. 2), indicating that these genes were highly correlated with the clinical phenotype of sepsis, regardless of geographical location or genetic background.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The Venn diagram showed the shared significant genes of the four datasets. There were only two shared genes (ANXA3 and CD177) in the four results. ANXA3: Annexin A3.

3.2. ANXA3 expression is sharply up-regulated in blood samples of septic patients

CD177 had been reported as a biomarker of sepsis previously [18,19], while it is verified to be a biomarker only in lung tissue experimentally [18]. Therefore, we focused our attention on whether the other gene, ANXA3, could act as a sepsis biomarker. More datasets were used for validation in silico. As for age, 5 datasets were conducted in adults and 4 in pediatric subjects. As for geographical locations or ethnicities, 5 were from North America, 3 from Europe, and 1 from Asia. As for experimental settings, 7 were performed using microarray and 2 using RNA-sequencing. Among the 9 datasets, ANXA3 was all sharply up-regulated in the peripheral blood samples of septic patients compared with the control groups (Fig. 3), regardless of ethnicity, age, or experimental settings.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The ANXA3 gene was significantly up-regulated in sepsis patients compared to controls. Each box plot represented the expression level of ANXA3 in peripheral blood. The first five studies were conducted in the adult groups, and the last four were conducted in the pediatric groups. The ROC curve of each dataset was located below the corresponding boxplot, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to investigate the diagnostic value of the ANXA3 gene as a biomarker, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic. AUC: Area Under Curve.

Besides, ROC curves were generated from each dataset to confirm the performance of ANXA3 as a biomarker (Fig. 3). A good biomarker should have high sensitivity (the ability to correctly identify true positives) and specificity (the ability to correctly identify true negatives), which is reflected by the high AUC value of the ROC curve. The AUC values for ANXA3 varied between 0.883 and 1.000, equal to or close to 1.000 in all 9 datasets, indicating that ANXA3 has excellent diagnostic performance (Fig. 3).

3.3. ANXA3 helps to make an accurate diagnosis of sepsis

The results of different ages, races, and experiment settings above proved that the transcription of ANXA3 was significantly up-regulated in the peripheral blood samples of septic patients compared with healthy controls. We next studied whether this gene could distinguish sepsis from diseases with similar symptoms. The dataset GSE131411 contained peripheral blood samples from both septic shock and cardiogenic shock cases. It can be seen that the transcript level of ANXA3 was significantly higher in the septic shock group than in the cardiogenic shock group (Fig. 4). Since septic shock is a severe form of sepsis and shares similar signs and symptoms with non-septic shock (such as cardiogenic shock), it is of great value to utilize ANXA3 as a potential biomarker to distinguish the two conditions.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

ANXA3 could help to distinguish septic shock from cardiogenic shock. The dataset GSE131411 from Spain showed that the expression of ANXA3 was significantly higher in peripheral blood samples of septic shock patients compared to cardiogenic shock. ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

3.4. ANXA3 exhibits stable expression across different neutrophil subpopulations

Since ANXA3 is expressed restrictively in neutrophils in blood leukocyte populations [20], we next investigated whether different expression of ANXA3 exists in different neutrophils subtypes in the blood of sepsis patients. The single-cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE167363 was used in this study. After downloading the data, merging samples, quality control, re-clustering, batch effect removal, standardization, dimensionality reduction, and re-clustering, all cells were divided into 13 clusters with a resolution of 0.3, and each cluster was annotated according to the reference cell type marker gene (Fig. 5A). The results showed that ANXA3 predominantly expressed in neutrophils, although there is some low expression in other cell types. (Fig. 5B). And then we focused on the neutrophils. After removing a few misclustered monocytes and erythroid cells (Supplementary Fig. 1), the re-clustering process was performed, resulting three subpopulations of neutrophils (Fig. 5C). There were no significant differences in the expression levels of ANXA3 among these subpopulations (Fig. 5D), indicating stable expression of this gene.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Stability of ANXA3 expression across different neutrophil subpopulations. (A) Cellular heterogeneity revealed by clustering analysis, with all cells segregated into 13 distinct clusters at a resolution setting of 0.3. (B) ANXA3 is highly expressed in neutrophils, while showing minimal expression in other cell types. (C) Illustration of the three identified neutrophil subpopulations. (D) Quantitative analysis confirms no significant difference of ANXA3 expression levels across the three neutrophil subsets, indicating consistent expression profiles.

3.5. Validation of Anxa3 as a potential biomarker in murine sepsis model

The above results in silico suggested that ANXA3 was a good biomarker that could distinguish sepsis from healthy controls and septic shock from similar conditions. To verify the upregulation in sepsis, we established a murine sepsis model by CLP and investigated the transcript levels of Anxa3 in vivo. In addition, to rule out the possibility that the up-regulation of Anxa3 was due to a simple infection, we also established an E. coli infection model. At 24 h after modeling, the peripheral blood of mice was collected and lysed to remove red blood cells. Total mRNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and the relative transcript levels of Anxa3 were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. The result showed that the transcription of Anxa3 was significantly increased in the peripheral blood of septic mice (Fig. 6A) (n = 4 for each group. Unpaired t-tests were performed. ∗∗P < 0.01.), demonstrating the potential of Anxa3 as a biomarker. Moreover, E. coli infection did not significantly increase Anxa3 transcription (Fig. 6A). This suggests that the up-regulation of Anxa3 is specific in sepsis, and that other factors rather than just infection may be responsible for this biomarker effect. In addition, to verify whether Anxa3 can serve as an early biomarker for sepsis, we detected the expression levels of Anxa3 in the whole blood of septic mice at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post CLP. The results showed that the expression level of Anxa3 was significantly up-regulated as early as 6 h after sepsis modelling (Fig. 6B). This suggests the predictive value of ANXA3 for early-stage sepsis.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Validation of Anxa3 as a biomarker of sepsis in mice. (A) Quantitative real-time PCR illustrating the significant upregulation of Anxa3 in the peripheral blood of mice after CLP modelling, but not in simple E. coli infection. Transcript abundance of Anxa3 in the peripheral blood were measured at 24 h after modelling. n = 4 for each group. ∗∗P < 0.01. (B) The expression level of Anxa3 was significantly up-regulated as early as 6 h post CLP, suggesting that Anxa3 has predictive value in early sepsis. PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction. CLP: Cecal Ligation and Puncture. E. coli: Escherichia coli.

3.6. ANXA3 was up-regulated in the myeloid cells in septic mice

The expression of a certain protein on particular cell populations can indicate a certain pathological state. For example, an upregulation of Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) in dendritic cells and macrophages reflects a hyperinflammatory state of sepsis [21], and a decreased monocytic human leukocyte antigen DR (mHLA-DR) represents a later immunosuppressive state [22]. To explore the expression of ANXA3 on particular types of immune cells during sepsis comprehensively, we established the mouse sepsis model as described above and harvested the peripheral blood, peritoneal lavage, spleen, and thymus 24 h after CLP. Since ANXA3 shows restricted expression to neutrophils among blood leukocyte populations [20], blood neutrophils were first stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The results showed that the proportion of ANXA3+ cells in blood neutrophils (Ly6G+) was significantly increased (Fig. 7A) (n = 4 for each group. Unpaired t-tests were performed. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.). Then, other primary myeloid cells (including total myeloid cells in the peritoneal cavity, peritoneal cavity neutrophils, and peritoneal cavity macrophages) and primary lymphoid cells (including spleen B cells, thymic T cells) were also collected, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The results showed that the proportions of ANXA3+ cells were significantly increased in peritoneal macrophages (F4/80+), neutrophils (Ly6G+), and total myeloid cells (CD11b+) after CLP (Fig. 7B–D). Moreover, the ratio of ANXA3+ spleen B cells (CD19+) also showed an increasing trend in septic mice (Fig. 7E). Of note, there was no ANXA3+ thymic T cells (CD3+) detectable in either sham-operated or septic mice (Fig. 7F), consistent with previous reports [20]. Collectively, ANXA3 was up-regulated mainly in the myeloid cells after sepsis modeling.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Positive ratios of ANXA3 protein in immune cells in septic mice as measured by flow cytometry. (A) blood neutrophils (gated as Ly6G+); (B) peritoneal myeloid cells (gated as CD11b+); (C) peritoneal macrophages (gated as F4/80+); (D) peritoneal neutrophils (gated as Ly6G+); (E) spleen B cells (gated as CD19+); (F) thymus T cells (gated as CD3+). n = 4 for each group. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. CLP: Cecal Ligation and Puncture.

3.7. ANXA3 protein was up-regulated in the spleen, down-regulated in the lung, and was not detected in the liver of septic mouse

Since CD177 had been reported as a biomarker of sepsis only in lung tissue experimentally, we further investigated the expression of ANXA3 protein in the spleen, lung, and liver. Organs were harvested 24 h after CLP, and immunohistochemistry was performed. The results showed that sepsis modeling could lead to a significant increase in the protein level of ANXA3 in the spleen compared with the sham-operated group (Fig. 8A). The immunohistochemical results of the lung sections showed that ANXA3 in the vascular endothelium was significantly down-regulated in septic mice (Fig. 8B). As shown in the figure, ANXA3 is expressed in vascular endothelial cells, indicating it may have certain functions in these cells, which warrant further investigation. In the liver, ANXA3 protein was rarely detected, and it did not show a significant change after sepsis modeling (Fig. 8C).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The expression level of ANXA3 protein in the spleen (A), lung (B), and liver (C) in septic mice. After 24 h after CLP, the organs were harvested, and abundances of ANXA3 protein were evaluated and quantitated by immunohistochemical staining. ANXA3 was significantly up-regulated in the spleen (A) and significantly down-regulated in the pulmonary vascular endothelium (B) in septic mice. Also, this protein showed few abundances in the liver (C). The CLP operation was utilized to induce sepsis. n = 3 for each group. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. In 40 × magnification and 200 × magnification, the scale bar represents 500 μm and 100 μm respectively. CLP: Cecal Ligation and Puncture.

4. Discussion

Early recognition of sepsis is a prerequisite for appropriate treatment to reduce organ system damage and mortality. SOFA is currently the gold standard for sepsis diagnosis based on multi-organ dysfunction [1]. However, SOFA and qSOFA are retrospective and based on global organ function which lacks diagnostic specificity. The pathogenesis and development of sepsis are very complex, so it relies on molecular biomarkers to indicate different aspects of sepsis. For example, CRP, PCT, and IL-6 indicate infection or inflammation, thrombomodulin indicates coagulation, lactate indicates tissue hypoxia, angiopoietin-2 indicates endothelial injury, and mHLA-DR indicates immunosuppression [23]. Regrettably, these biomarkers lack the accuracy and specificity to accurately diagnose sepsis early. This may be the reason why the success of CLP modeling does not depend on these biomarker indications [15]. Collectively, sepsis requires more effective biomarkers.

Traditionally, searching for genes most related to diseases between patients and healthy people was the starting point for biomarker discovery. Blood-derived biomarkers are more applicable in clinical practice since the peripheral blood of patients is relatively easier to obtain than tissue sections. In the past decades, the widespread application of whole-genome technologies and bioinformatics analysis methods have made it possible to find significant genes on a large scale and provided a new way to discover biomarkers in blood [24]. In this study, four datasets from different regions were first analyzed using the WGCNA bioinformatics algorithm. The results showed that ANXA3 and CD177 were the overlapped genes shared by the datasets of different races. Considering that CD177 expression had been proved not up-regulated in peripheral blood but in lung tissue in response to sepsis modeling, and lung tissue is clinically difficult to obtain [18], the unstudied gene ANXA3 was selected for further research. The results showed that the transcript abundance of ANXA3 in the whole blood of patients with sepsis was higher than that of healthy controls, and this gene was more highly expressed in septic shock which could distinguish septic shock from cardiogenic shock. A good biomarker should demonstrate both high sensitivity and specificity. The ROC curve describes the relationship between the sensitivity and specificity of a biomarker with different cutoff values. In all datasets, the AUC values of ANXA3 were equal to or close to 1, suggesting that ANXA3 has the potential to be a biomarker of sepsis. Of note, we found that ANXA3 has the potential to act as a biomarker alone in both adults and children, expanding on previous findings [25]. In addition, when we reviewed the literature, we did not find any non-specific inflammatory biomarkers, such as PCT and CRP, that could distinguish between septic shock and cardiogenic shock, whereas ANXA3 could.

We screened ANXA3 and preliminarily validated its performance as a biomarker in silico. Further, its performance was verified by murine experiments. The results of quantitative real-time PCR indicated that the expression of Anxa3 was significantly increased in blood samples from septic mice, while this effect was not present in mice with simple infection. This demonstrated the performance of Anxa3 as the blood biomarker for sepsis in mice.

There is no evidence that ANXA3 is a secreted protein, so it cannot be detected at the extracellular level, and detection at the intracellular level may result in high detection costs [26]. Our study identified the biomarker potential of ANXA3 at the transcriptional level, enabling it to diagnose sepsis with a fast and simple qPCR. Given that whole blood can be obtained quickly and easily, the use of the transcription level of ANXA3 in the diagnosis of sepsis may have broad application prospects.

In addition, the expression changes of ANXA3 in different tissues and immune cells were studied for the first time by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, providing a landscape for its pathological expression pattern and clues to the potential function of ANXA3 in sepsis. Previous studies reported that ANXA3 was mainly expressed on neutrophils under normal conditions [20]. In this study, we further revealed that the expression of ANXA3 was significantly increased in myeloid cells in sepsis (Fig. 7). Myeloid cells constitute more than half of the leukocytes in the whole blood and are even higher in sepsis. Therefore, using ANXA3 as a biomarker has an advantage in blood sample tests in clinical practice.

ANXA3 is a member of the annexin family, and its length is 323 amino acids, with 4 conserved domains, 5 α helices, and a Ca2+ binding site [20,[27], [28], [29]]. The annexin family is a structurally homologous Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding protein, which has omnifarious functions, including maintaining the integrity of the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix, affecting endocytosis and exocytosis, regulating ion channel transport, participating in membrane fusion and extracellular secretion, and regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. ANXA3, in particular, is associated with the vesicle transport, cell membrane fusion, and cell granule aggregation in neutrophils, which may contribute to pathogen clearance and infection resolution in sepsis on one hand, but exacerbating inflammation and organ damage on the other hand [37,38]. Overexpression of ANXA3 enhanced the proliferation and migration of microglia [39], while these behaviors of myeloid cells, if any, in sepsis may contribute to pathogen clearance or exacerbate the inflammatory cascade. Since numerous immune cells underwent apoptosis in the spleen during sepsis [40], the up-regulated expression of ANXA3 in the spleen may be a response to immune cells’ proliferation and migration (Fig. 8A). Among the multiple organ dysfunctions in sepsis, lung injury was the earliest and most common, and vascular endothelial injury was an important component of lung injury [41]. The down-regulated expression of ANXA3 in the vascular endothelium suggested that it might be associated with pulmonary vascular endothelial injury (Fig. 8B). Moreover, as sepsis initially presents as a state of hyperactive immunity, which subsequently transitions into immunosuppression. Considering that decreased ANXA3 expression might contribute to the suppression of excessive inflammatory responses [42], the downregulation of ANXA3 in the lung might be a manifestation of pulmonary immunosuppressive state. Collectively, the role of ANXA3 in sepsis is still unclear and worth further exploring. Since ANXA3 expression is mainly elevated in myeloid cells upon sepsis, we are planning to construct transgenic mice harboring a conditional deletion of ANXA3 in myeloid cells to investigate its role in the myeloid system comprehensively in sepsis.

Compared with traditional sepsis biomarkers, ANXA3 has the following advantages: First, the sample acquisition is straightforward and peripheral blood can be used as a test sample. Second, it is helpful to distinguish between cardiogenic shock and septic shock, which is helpful for clinical judgment. Third, it has good sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the integration of ANXA3 into existing frameworks for sepsis diagnosis has the potential to facilitate rapid diagnosis, risk prediction, and stratification.

In fact, ANXA3 has been used as an independent or combined biomarker in other fields, such as COVID-19 [43], ischemic stroke [44], and ovarian serous carcinoma [45]. ANXA3's versatility in reflecting pathological states underscores its importance in the clinical setting, where it might facilitate early detection and disease monitoring. ANXA3 is a subject of keen interest for researchers aiming to elucidate disease mechanisms and develop targeted therapies. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to explore the expression pattern and functional significance of ANXA3 in a range of diseases in order to fully utilize its clinical application.

Previous studies have also shown high expression of ANXA3 in whole blood of patients with sepsis, which is consistent with our work [20,42]. In this study, we found that ANXA3 has the potential to act as a biomarker alone in both adults and children, and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the ANXA3 gene, explored differences in its expression in sepsis versus simple infection, and investigated its potential as a distinct biomarker for sepsis.

Although the WGCNA algorithm has been used in numerous studies, it has previously been limited to building gene co-expression modules. In this study, we tried to identify genes with high GS values using various datasets, and then searched for common genes in these datasets. The value of this study lies not only in the discovery of ANXA3 as a biomarker, but also in the discovery of a new method that can then be used to find biomarkers in other diseases. Given that GS value is calculated as the correlation coefficient between the expression level of each gene and the disease status, it is more likely to be biologically relevant [9]. This is an advantage of the new method over the traditional methods. In the future, this method has the potential to be applied to discover more biomarkers for diseases.

Nevertheless, due to the limitations of our laboratory conditions, this study did not include comparative analyses with other biomarkers (PCT, CRP, IL-6) or diagnostic criteria (SOFA, qSOFA). In addition, due to ethical issues, we did not collect blood samples from patients with clinical sepsis to verify the effects of ANXA3 as a biomarker. Clinicians are welcome to further validate the accuracy and advantages of ANXA3 as a diagnostic marker in future clinical work.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we revealed and confirmed that ANXA3 is a novel biomarker of sepsis. It has a potential broad application prospect in the diagnosis of clinical sepsis.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81772124 to Y.W.) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (20S11902900 to Y.W. and 22YF1445800 to H.C.Z.).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved and supervised by the Ethics Committee of Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China, with the approval number: 81772124. All animal studies complied with the ARRIVE guidelines. Patient data were obtained from the publicly open database GEO and informed patient consent was not applicable.

Data availability

Data used to perform bioinformatic analysis are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, which can be found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. And the experimental data in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jing-Xiang Zhang: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xin-Hao Xing: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Ren-Yi Lu: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Meng-Xiao Liu: Validation, Investigation, Data curation. Wei-Heng Xu: Supervision, Resources, Project administration. Hao-Cheng Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Qing-Jie Zhao: Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization. Yan Wang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Ren-Hui Wan at Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University) (Shanghai, 200003, China) for his assistance with the CLP procedures.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38608.

Contributor Information

Jing-Xiang Zhang, Email: 1041474170@qq.com.

Yan Wang, Email: wangyancn@smmu.edu.cn.

List of abbreviations:

ANXA3

Annexin A3

AUC

Area Under Curve

CLP

Cecal Ligation and Puncture

CRP

C-reactive Protein

DAB

Diaminobenzidine

GEO

Gene Expression Omnibus

GS

Gene-trait Significance

mHLA-DR

monocytic Human Leukocyte Antigen DR

ME

Module Eigengene

PTX3

Pentraxin-3

PBS

Phosphate Buffer Saline

PCT

Procalcitonin

qSOFA

quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

ROC

Receiver Operating Characteristic

SOFA

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

WGCNA

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article.

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (16KB, docx)

figs1.

figs1

References

  • 1.Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reinhart K., Daniels R., Kissoon N., Machado F.R., Schachter R.D., Finfer S. Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority - a WHO resolution. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377(5):414–417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fleischmann C., Scherag A., Adhikari N.K.J., Hartog C.S., Tsaganos T., Schlattmann P., et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;193(3):259–272. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bauer M., Gerlach H., Vogelmann T., Preissing F., Stiefel J., Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care. 2020;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simpson S.Q. New sepsis criteria: a change we should not make. Chest. 2016;149(5):1117–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lambden S., Laterre P.F., Levy M.M., Francois B. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit. Care. 2019;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tan M., Lu Y., Jiang H., Zhang L. The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120(4):5852–5859. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hung S.-K., Lan H.-M., Han S.-T., Wu C.-C., Chen K.-F. Current evidence and limitation of biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection. Biomedicines. 2020;8(11) doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8110494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Langfelder P., Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinf. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhao X., Zhang L., Wang J., Zhang M., Song Z., Ni B., et al. Identification of key biomarkers and immune infiltration in systemic lupus erythematosus by integrated bioinformatics analysis. J. Transl. Med. 2021;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02698-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wan Q., Tang J., Han Y., Wang D. Co-expression modules construction by WGCNA and identify potential prognostic markers of uveal melanoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2018;166:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang N., Liu Y., Yang C., Li X. Review of the predictive value of biomarkers in sepsis mortality. Emerg Med Int. 2024;2024 doi: 10.1155/2024/2715606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang M., Wang L., Pu L., Li K., Feng T., Zheng P., et al. LncRNAs related key pathways and genes in ischemic stroke by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) Genomics. 2020;112(3):2302–2308. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tian Z., He W., Tang J., Liao X., Yang Q., Wu Y., et al. Identification of important modules and biomarkers in breast cancer based on WGCNA. OncoTargets Ther. 2020;13:6805–6817. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S258439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rittirsch D., Huber-Lang M.S., Flierl M.A., Ward P.A. Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4(1):31–36. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vega-Pérez A., Villarrubia L.H., Godio C., Gutiérrez-González A., Feo-Lucas L., Ferriz M., et al. Resident macrophage-dependent immune cell scaffolds drive anti-bacterial defense in the peritoneal cavity. Immunity. 2021;54(11) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rao X., Huang X., Zhou Z., Lin X. An improvement of the 2^(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat Bioinforma Biomath. 2013;3(3):71–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rasooli A., Ghafari E., Saedi H., Miri S. Expression changes of CD177 and MPO as novel biomarkers in lung tissue of CLP model rats. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2018;48(6):1321. doi: 10.3906/sag-1806-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Demaret J., Venet F., Plassais J., Cazalis M.-A., Vallin H., Friggeri A., et al. Identification of CD177 as the most dysregulated parameter in a microarray study of purified neutrophils from septic shock patients. Immunol. Lett. 2016;178:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Toufiq M., Roelands J., Alfaki M., Syed Ahamed Kabeer B., Saadaoui M., Lakshmanan A.P., et al. Annexin A3 in sepsis: novel perspectives from an exploration of public transcriptome data. Immunology. 2020;161(4):291–302. doi: 10.1111/imm.13239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Porte R., Davoudian S., Asgari F., Parente R., Mantovani A., Garlanda C., et al. The long Pentraxin PTX3 as a humoral innate immunity functional player and biomarker of infections and sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:794. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Monneret G., Venet F. Sepsis-induced immune alterations monitoring by flow cytometry as a promising tool for individualized therapy. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016;90(4):376–386. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Faix J.D. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab Sci. 2013;50(1):23–36. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2013.764490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang J.-X., Xu W.-H., Xing X.-H., Chen L.-L., Zhao Q.-J., Wang Y. ARG1 as a promising biomarker for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis: evidence from WGCNA and PPI network. Hereditas. 2022;159(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41065-022-00240-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu H.-x., Ma C.-c., Wen D.-l., Chen G.-s., Zhang F., Xu G., et al. Evaluation and validation of the increased annexin A3 (ANXA3) as a novel biomarker to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Research Square. 2022 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moss S.E., Morgan R.O. The annexins. Genome Biol. 2004;5(4):219. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sopkova J., Raguenes-Nicol C., Vincent M., Chevalier A., Lewit-Bentley A., Russo-Marie F., et al. Ca(2+) and membrane binding to annexin 3 modulate the structure and dynamics of its N terminus and domain III. Protein Sci. 2002;11(7):1613–1625. doi: 10.1110/ps.4230102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Favier-Perron B., Lewit-Bentley A., Russo-Marie F. The high-resolution crystal structure of human annexin III shows subtle differences with annexin V. Biochemistry. 1996;35(6):1740–1744. doi: 10.1021/bi952092o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xi Y., Ju R., Wang Y. Roles of Annexin A protein family in autophagy regulation and therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;130 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rhee H.J., Kim G.Y., Huh J.W., Kim S.W., Na D.S. Annexin I is a stress protein induced by heat, oxidative stress and a sulfhydryl-reactive agent. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000;267(11):3220–3225. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chetcuti A., Margan S.H., Russell P., Mann S., Millar D.S., Clark S.J., et al. Loss of annexin II heavy and light chains in prostate cancer and its precursors. Cancer Res. 2001;61(17):6331–6334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhao W.-Q., Chen G.H., Chen H., Pascale A., Ravindranath L., Quon M.J., et al. Secretion of Annexin II via activation of insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278(6):4205–4215. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210545200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bianchi C., Bombelli S., Raimondo F., Torsello B., Angeloni V., Ferrero S., et al. Primary cell cultures from human renal cortex and renal-cell carcinoma evidence a differential expression of two spliced isoforms of Annexin A3. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176(4):1660–1670. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huber R., Berendes R., Burger A., Luecke H., Karshikov A. Annexin V-crystal structure and its implications on function. Behring Inst. Mitt. 1992;(91):107–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Réty S., Sopková-de Oliveira Santos J., Dreyfuss L., Blondeau K., Hofbauerová K., Raguénès-Nicol C., et al. The crystal structure of annexin A8 is similar to that of annexin A3. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;345(5):1131–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perron B., Lewit-Bentley A., Geny B., Russo-Marie F. Can enzymatic activity, or otherwise, be inferred from structural studies of annexin III? J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272(17):11321–11326. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.17.11321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ernst J.D., Hoye E., Blackwood R.A., Jaye D. Purification and characterization of an abundant cytosolic protein from human neutrophils that promotes Ca2(+)-dependent aggregation of isolated specific granules. J. Clin. Investig. 1990;85(4):1065–1071. doi: 10.1172/JCI114537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Le Cabec V., Maridonneau-Parini I. Annexin 3 is associated with cytoplasmic granules in neutrophils and monocytes and translocates to the plasma membrane in activated cells. Biochem. J. 1994;303(Pt 2):481–487. doi: 10.1042/bj3030481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Z., Li Z., Ma Z., Deng M., Xing M., Wu J., et al. Annexin A3 as a marker protein for microglia in the central nervous system of rats. Neural Plast. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/5575090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abraham E., Glauser M.P., Butler T., Garbino J., Gelmont D., Laterre P.F., et al. p55 Tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Ro 45-2081 Study Group. JAMA. 1997;277(19):1531–1538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Abraham E., Arcaroli J., Carmody A., Wang H., Tracey K.J. Cutting edge: HMG-1 as a mediator of acute lung inflammation. J. Immunol. 2000;165(6):2950–2954. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.2950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liang J., Zhang J., Fan J., Chen S., Wu W. ANXA3 interference inactivates ERK/ELK1 pathway to mitigate inflammation and apoptosis in sepsis-associated acute lung injury. Mol. Immunol. 2024;167:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2024.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang Z., Cheng Z., Deng X., Yang Y., Sun N., Hou P., et al. Integrated bioinformatics exploration and preliminary clinical verification for the identification of crucial biomarkers in severe cases of COVID-19. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024;17:1561–1576. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S454284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu L., Cai Y., Deng C. Identification of ANXA3 as a biomarker associated with pyroptosis in ischemic stroke. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2023;28(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01564-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li D.-Q., Lin M., Abdelrahman Z. High expression of the ANXA3 gene promotes immune infiltration and improves tumor prognosis in ovarian serous carcinoma using bioinformatics analyses. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022;10(19):1055. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (16KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data used to perform bioinformatic analysis are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, which can be found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. And the experimental data in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES