Skip to main content
Galen Medical Journal logoLink to Galen Medical Journal
. 2023 Aug 21;12:1–13. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v12i0.2993

A Short Review on Advances in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

Bin Sun 1, Zhigang Wang 1,*
PMCID: PMC11491119  PMID: 39430040

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in early diagnosis and treatment modalities. This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke, highlighting the importance of the potential impact on patient outcomes. Recent advancements have focused on various aspects of stroke care, including imaging techniques, laboratory testing, telemedicine and mobile technology, intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and collaborative systems. Advances in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Computed tomography perfusion imaging, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, multimodal imaging, and automated image processing tools have greatly improved the ability to assess the extent of ischemic injury. Laboratory testing has seen significant progress in identifying biomarkers associated with ischemic stroke. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have improved our understanding of the cardiac component of stroke. Additionally, biomarkers such as S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neuron-specific enolase have shown promise in assessing stroke severity and prognosis. Mobile applications and wearable devices facilitate stroke symptom recognition, risk assessment, and prompt medical attention. The development of tenecteplase, a modified form of tissue plasminogen activator, has enhanced clot-dissolving efficacy. Collaborative systems, including regional stroke systems of care and telestroke networks, have optimized communication and coordination among healthcare providers. Interoperable electronic health records streamline information exchange and facilitate prompt decision-making. Mobile communication technologies enhance real-time collaboration, involving all stakeholders in stroke care. Future directions focus on artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for stroke diagnosis and risk assessment. Wearable devices and remote monitoring may enable continuous monitoring of stroke-related indicators. Overall, advances in early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke can enhance stroke care, reduce treatment delays, and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Ischemic Stroke, Brain Ischemia, Artificial Intelligence, Computed Tomography Angiography, intravenous Thrombolysis

Introduction

Ischemic stroke is a devastating condition that affects millions of individuals worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality [1]. It occurs due to the obstruction of blood flow to the brain, leading to the deprivation of oxygen and nutrients and resulting in brain tissue damage [2]. Timely diagnosis and treatment play a critical role in improved patient outcomes, as early intervention can prevent long-term disability and minimize the risk of complications [3].

Over the years, there have been remarkable advancements in the early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke [4]. These advancements have revolutionized the medical landscape, providing physicians with innovative tools and therapeutic strategies that enable faster and more precise interventions [5]. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the recent advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke, the importance of timely intervention, and its potential impacts on patient outcomes.

1.Early Diagnosis

1.1. Clinical Assessment

Clinical assessment is an essential component of the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke as it serves as the initial point of evaluation for healthcare professionals [5]. It involves a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s medical history, risk factors, and physical examination, which collectively aid in identifying potential cases of stroke promptly [6][7].

The medical history assessment collects information about the patient’s past medical conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks [ 8]. These factors provide crucial insights into the patient’s underlying health status and the presence of potential stroke risk factors [9].

Also, risk factor assessment is an integral part of clinical assessment for early diagnosis [10]. Risk factors contributing to ischemic stroke include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity, atrial fibrillation, sedentary lifestyle, and a family history of stroke [8][11]. Evaluating the presence and severity of these risk factors helps clinicians assess the patient’s susceptibility to stroke and determine the best course of action for diagnosis and treatment [12].

Physical examination during clinical assessment consists of the evaluation of vital signs, focusing on blood pressure (BP), heart rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation [13]. A sudden increase in BP or an irregular heart rhythm may indicate an acute ischemic event [14]. Moreover, a detailed neurological examination helps assess motor function, speech, and sensory abilities, which can provide valuable information about the location and extent of the stroke [15][16].

Specific examination techniques, such as assessing the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, aid healthcare providers in quantifying the severity of the patient’s clinical presentation [17]. The NIHSS score encompasses various neurological assessments, including motor and sensory function, language abilities, level of consciousness, and visual field testing [17][ 18]. This standardized scoring system assists in gauging the severity of the stroke, tracking disease progression, and determining appropriate treatment interventions [19].

1.2. Imaging Techniques

1.2.1. Traditional Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (CT)

The non-contrast CT scans allow clinicians to visualize the brain anatomy and identify areas of ischemic damage without the need for contrast agents [20][21]. Traditional non-contrast CT is a widely used imaging modality in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke [20]. It provides fast and readily available information about the presence of acute infarction or other intracranial abnormalities that may contribute to stroke symptoms [21][22]. Indeed, non-contrast CT imaging is particularly valuable in the early stages of stroke assessment when time is critical for treatment decisions [23].

Moreover, it is a highly sensitive imaging technique in detecting hemorrhages, such as intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, which may mimic stroke symptoms but require different treatment approaches [24]. By ruling out hemorrhagic stroke, non-contrast CT helps guide appropriate management and interventions for ischemic stroke patients [ 25]. Early signs of ischemic stroke on non-contrast CT include hypodense areas or decreased attenuation within the brain parenchyma, representing reduced blood flow [26]. Also, such findings include loss of gray-white matter differentiation, hypo attenuation in the middle cerebral artery territory, or subtle sulcal effacement could be observed [26][27]. Combining these findings with the patient’s clinical presentation and examination could confirm the diagnosis of ischemic stroke.

In addition, non-contrast CT has additional benefits in assessing stroke-related complications and determining eligibility for specific therapies [28]. It can identify other important findings, such as large vessel occlusions, which may be suitable for endovascular thrombectomy procedures [29]. Additionally, non-contrast CT provides vital information about the extent and location of infarction, which predicts the potential impact on patient outcomes [ 29].

Despite its advantages, non-contrast CT does have limitations in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke. It may not detect subtle or small infarcts in the hyperacute phase, and early imaging changes may not always be evident immediately following symptom onset [26][30]. Therefore, in the cases where clinical suspicion of stroke remains high despite a negative non-contrast CT, additional imaging such as advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques include magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) may be warranted [31][32].

1.2.2. CT Angiography (CTA)

CTA is an advanced imaging technique that plays a crucial role in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke. It combines CT scanning with the injection of a contrast agent to visualize detailed images of the arterial anatomy, allowing for the identification of occlusions or stenosis that may contribute to ischemic stroke [33][ 34]. Indeed, CTA scans can identify stenosis in major cerebral arteries such as the middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery [35]. Hence, one of the key advantages of CTA is its ability to rapidly provide high-quality images of the blood vessels without the need for invasive procedures [33][36]. Also, this information is vital for determining the most appropriate treatment approach, whether it be medical management, thrombolysis, or mechanical thrombectomy [37]. CTA also facilitates the identification of collateral blood flow patterns. In cases where the primary artery is occluded, collateral vessels may offer an alternative route for blood supply to the affected brain region [38]. Assessing collateral circulation through CTA can help predict the potential for successful revascularization procedures and guide treatment decisions accordingly [39]. Moreover, CTA is particularly valuable in the hyperacute stage of stroke, where time is of the essence [ 39].

1.2.3. MRI

MRI is a valuable imaging modality for the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke [40]. Indeed, it could provide detailed images of the brain, allowing for the visualization of ischemic damage, identification of stroke etiology, and assessment of perfusion and diffusion abnormalities [41].

The DWI is a specific MRI sequence that is highly sensitive to changes in water diffusion in brain tissue [42]. Restricted diffusion occurs in the affected area during the early phase of the ischemic stroke process [42][ 43]. These findings can appear within minutes to a few hours after symptom onset, making DWI particularly useful in the hyperacute phase of stroke evaluation [42][43][44].

Also, PWI is another important MRI technique in stroke diagnosis. PWI provides information about cerebral blood flow dynamics, allowing clinicians to assess the viability of brain tissue and detect alterations in regional perfusion [45]. In ischemic stroke, regions with reduced blood flow, known as hypoperfused areas, can be visualized on PWI [46]. Coupled with DWI, PWI could identify the ischemic core (irreversibly damaged tissue) and the surrounding ischemic penumbra (potentially salvageable tissue), which is crucial in determining treatment strategies [47].

In addition to DWI and PWI, MRA can be applied in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke by assessing the blood vessels’ integrity and identifying stenosis or occlusions [48]. So, information from MRA is vital in determining the underlying cause of the ischemic stroke, such as atherosclerosis or embolism [49]. Hence, the advantage of MRI over other imaging modalities is its superior soft tissue contrast and the ability to obtain multiplanar views of the brain [41][50]. Also, it allows for more detailed evaluation of the extent and location of ischemic infarction, helping guide treatment decisions, and is beneficial in differentiating ischemic stroke from other conditions, such as intracranial hemorrhage or tumors, which may have similar clinical presentations [ 51][52].

1.3. Laboratory Testing

Advancements in laboratory testing have played a significant role in the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke, leading to more timely and accurate interventions [53]. Recent advancements in laboratory techniques and biomarkers have improved our understanding of stroke pathology and provided valuable tools for early diagnosis [ 54]. One important advancement is the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays [55].

Cardiac troponin is a biomarker released into the bloodstream during cardiac injury, including myocardial infarction [55]. Research has shown that elevated levels of cardiac troponin can also be detected in patients with ischemic brain stroke, indicating a potential cardiac component or coexisting cardiac injury [54]. High-sensitivity assays enable the detection of very low levels of cardiac troponin, allowing for the identification of subtle myocardial injury that may have contributed to the stroke event [55].

In addition to cardiac markers, several other biomarkers have shown promise in the early diagnosis of ischemic brain stroke. For instance, S100B, a protein released by damaged brain cells, has been found to be elevated in stroke patients [56]. Measuring S100B levels in the bloodstream can help determine the severity and prognosis of the stroke [57]. Other biomarkers, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein [58] and neuron-specific enolase [59] shown potential as indicators of stroke severity, brain injury, and prognosis.

Other biomarkers, such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) [60], inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein [61], and interleukin-6 [62] have shown promise in early stroke diagnosis. MMPs are enzymes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, and their dysregulation is implicated in the pathogenesis of stroke [60]. Elevated levels of MMPs in the blood have been linked to an increased risk of stroke and can serve as valuable markers for early diagnosis [ 63]. Complete blood count and coagulation profile tests are routinely performed in patients with suspected ischemic stroke [64]. These tests evaluate parameters such as platelet count, hematocrit, and international normalized ratio, providing information about the patient’s coagulation status and the potential risk of bleeding or hypercoagulable states [65].

Furthermore, laboratory testing may include lipid profiles to measure cholesterol and triglycerides, as dyslipidemia is a known risk factor for ischemic stroke [66]. Assessing blood glucose levels is also essential, as hyperglycemia is associated with poorer outcomes and increased stroke severity [67]. A complete evaluation of other metabolic parameters, such as renal function, electrolyte abnormalities, and liver function can determine the overall health status of the patient and guide treatment decisions [68].

Advancements in genetic testing have also provided valuable insights into the risk and etiology of ischemic brain stroke [69]. Genetic testing can identify specific gene mutations, such as those related to coagulation disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden mutation), that increase the risk of stroke [70]. Detecting these genetic markers early on allows for targeted interventions and preventive measures in individuals at high risk of stroke [71]. Genetic testing can also identify genetic variants associated with specific stroke subtypes, allowing for tailored treatment approaches [72].

Moreover, the introduction of point-of-care testing (POCT) devices has revolutionized laboratory testing in stroke diagnosis [73]. These portable devices provide rapid and accurate results at the bedside, enabling healthcare providers to evaluate biomarkers such as glucose levels, coagulation profiles, and lipid profiles almost immediately [ 74]. POCT allows for timely decision-making, especially in time-sensitive scenarios such as thrombolytic therapy, where prompt assessment of coagulation status is crucial [73][75].

1.4. Telemedicine and Mobile Technology

Advancements in telemedicine and mobile technology have revolutionized the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke, particularly in remote or underserved areas [76]. These technological innovations have facilitated timely assessment and intervention for stroke patients, ultimately improving outcomes [77].

Telestroke programs could provide video conferencing and real-time communication to connect stroke specialists with healthcare providers in remote locations [78]. Through telemedicine, stroke experts can remotely assess patients, review imaging studies, and provide immediate guidance to local healthcare teams [79]. This enables rapid evaluation and early diagnosis of ischemic stroke, ensuring patients receive timely treatment, such as thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy [80].

These applications use validated algorithms and guidelines to assess symptoms, calculate stroke risk, and provide necessary recommendations for seeking medical attention promptly [81].

Also, mobile technology allows for the transmission of neurological examination findings, vital signs, and imaging studies in real-time, facilitating fast and accurate decision-making by stroke specialists [ 81]. For example, mobile applications can securely send CT scans to stroke experts for immediate interpretation, aiding in promptly diagnosing and determining appropriate treatment strategies [ 82].

Furthermore, telemedicine and mobile technologies have enhanced stroke education and awareness. Online platforms and mobile applications provide educational resources, raising public awareness about stroke risk factors, signs, and symptoms [83]. Increasing knowledge about stroke allows individuals to recognize stroke symptoms promptly and seek medical help without delay, resulting in earlier diagnosis and reduced time to treatment.

2. Early Treatment

2.1. Intravenous Thrombolysis

Advancements in intravenous thrombolysis have greatly improved the early treatment of ischemic stroke, allowing for more effective and timely interventions [84]. Intravenous thrombolysis involves the administration of an anti-coagulant medication, typically a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), to dissolve the blood clot causing the stroke [85].

One significant advancement in intravenous thrombolysis is the extension of the treatment window [86]. Previously, intravenous thrombolysis was only recommended within a limited time frame, typically within 4.5 hours after symptom onset [87]. However, recent studies have shown that selected patients may benefit from thrombolysis beyond this time window, up to nine hours or even longer in some instances [88][89]. This extended treatment window has expanded the number of eligible patients who can receive timely thrombolytic therapy and improved their chances of functional recovery [88].

Moreover, advancements in neuroimaging have facilitated the identification of patients who may benefit from thrombolysis despite initially presenting with uncertain symptom onset [89]. Imaging techniques like perfusion imaging and mismatch analysis can assess the extent of ischemic penumbra and the presence of large vessel occlusion, contributing to treatment decision-making [90]. These advances have allowed more patients with ischemic stroke to receive thrombolysis, even when the exact time of symptom onset is unknown [90].

Another significant advancement in thrombolytic therapy is the development of tenecteplase, a modified form of tPA that has several advantages [91]. Tenecteplase has a longer half-life, allowing for a single bolus administration instead of the continuous infusion required with tPA. It has increased fibrin specificity, which makes it more potent and effective in dissolving clots [91][92]. Previous studies [92][93] demonstrated improved reperfusion rates and functional outcomes compared to standard tPA.

Furthermore, advancements in pre-hospital management and stroke care systems have contributed to the early treatment of ischemic stroke with thrombolysis [94]. Mobile stroke units, equipped with neuroimaging and tPA administration capabilities, bring stroke expertise and interventions directly to the patient’s location [ 95]. These units allow for early triage and treatment initiation, reducing the time from symptom onset to thrombolysis and improving patient outcomes [96]. These advancements have allowed a broad range of eligible patients to receive thrombolysis, even in cases of uncertain symptom onset, leading to enhanced reperfusion, improved functional outcomes, and reduced disability rates for individuals with ischemic stroke [97].

2.2. Mechanical Thrombectomy

Advancements in mechanical thrombectomy have revolutionized the early treatment of ischemic stroke, providing a highly effective and minimally invasive intervention for patients with large vessel occlusions [98]. Mechanical thrombectomy involves using specialized devices to remove or disrupt the blood clot causing the stroke physically [99].

One significant advancement is the development of stent retrievers, which have greatly improved the success rates of mechanical thrombectomy [100]. Stent retrievers have demonstrated excellent recanalization rates and higher chances of functional independence compared to traditional methods of clot removal, leading to improved outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke [101][102].

Another notable advancement in mechanical thrombectomy is the expansion of the treatment window [103]. Previously, mechanical thrombectomy was primarily recommended within six hours of symptom onset [103]. However, clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for up to 24 hours in carefully selected patients with ischemic penumbra, offering a longer time window for intervention and expanding the number of eligible candidates [104][105].

Also, advancements in device technology have played an important role in improving mechanical thrombectomy outcomes [106]. Smaller, more flexible, and navigable catheters have been developed, enabling better access to the occluded vessel and enhancing the procedural success rate [107]. Newer-generation thrombectomy devices, such as aspiration catheters and stent retrievers with improved design and coatings, provide efficient clot removal while minimizing the risk of distal embolization and vessel injury [108][109].

3. Collaborative Systems

Advancements in collaborative systems have significantly improved the early treatment of ischemic stroke by enhancing communication and coordination among healthcare providers, stroke specialists, and emergency response teams [110]. Collaborative systems bring together various stakeholders involved in stroke care to easier the process and expedite treatment delivery [111].

One key advancement is the implementation of regional stroke systems of care. These systems establish networks among hospitals, emergency medical services, and stroke centers to ensure coordination and rapid response to stroke emergencies [112]. Regional stroke systems facilitate the identification of patients with stroke in the pre-hospital setting and provide a simple pathway for their referral to comprehensive stroke centers or specialized stroke units capable of delivering timely and appropriate interventions [113].

Through telemedicine technology, stroke experts can evaluate patients, review imaging studies, and guide treatment decisions [81]. Hence, healthcare providers in remote or rural regions could promptly access expert advice, ensuring the early initiation of appropriate treatments [83].

Advancements in information sharing and electronic health records (EHRs) have also played an important role in collaborative systems for early stroke treatment [114]. Interoperable EHRs allow for the transfer of patient information, including medical history, imaging studies, and laboratory test results [115].

4. Future Directions

Future directions for the early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke are focused on advancing technology, improving risk assessment methods, and enhancing treatment options [116]. These directions can potentially optimize stroke care and improve patient outcomes.

One important future direction is the development and integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms into stroke diagnosis and risk assessment [117]. AI algorithms can analyze complex datasets, such as imaging studies and patient data, to detect subtle signs of stroke or identify high-risk individuals [ 118]. Hence, it enhances the accuracy and efficiency of stroke diagnosis, allowing for earlier intervention and treatment.

Additionally, the integration of wearable devices and remote monitoring technologies may enable continuous monitoring of stroke-related biomarkers or physiological parameters [119]. These devices can detect early changes in key indicators, such as BP, heart rate, or glucose levels, allowing for early identification of stroke symptoms and prompt medical intervention [120]. Real-time monitoring can provide critical information to healthcare providers, facilitating timely diagnosis and treatment decisions [121].

Another future direction is the advancement of targeted therapies for stroke treatment. Currently, reperfusion therapy, including thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, is the mainstay of treatment for ischemic stroke [122]. However, the development of new pharmacological agents that target specific pathophysiological pathways, such as neuroinflammation or excitotoxicity, may enhance neuroprotection and improve outcomes in ischemic stroke [123][124]. These targeted therapies may combine with reperfusion strategies or standalone treatments to minimize brain damage and maximize recovery [125].

Future directions also emphasize the importance of stroke prevention through public health initiatives, education, and lifestyle interventions [126]. Promoting awareness about stroke risk factors, encouraging healthy lifestyle behaviors, and implementing effective screening programs can help identify high-risk individuals and allow early intervention to prevent stroke occurrence or recurrence [127].

Conclusion

Advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke have significantly transformed stroke care, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis facilitated by innovative imaging techniques and prompt intervention through thrombolytic therapy and mechanical thrombectomy has enhanced recovery rates and reduced disability. Furthermore, the implementation of collaborative systems, such as telemedicine, provides access to specialized stroke care in remote areas. Continued innovation and research in stroke management could optimize patient care and outcomes in the future.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Feske SK. Ischemic stroke. The American journal of medicine. 2021;12(134):1457–64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Herpich F, Rincon F. Management of acute ischemic stroke. Critical care medicine. 2020;11(48):1654–1654. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mendelson SJ, Prabhakaran S. Diagnosis and management of transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke: a review . Jama. 2021;11(325):1088–98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jangholi E, Sharifi ZN, Hoseinian M, Zarrindast MR, Rahimi HR, Mowla A, Aryan H, Javidi MA, Parsa Y, Ghaffarpasand F, Yadollah-Damavandi S. Verapamil inhibits mitochondria-induced reactive oxygen species and dependent apoptosis pathways in cerebral transient global ischemia/reperfusion . Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;(2020):5872645–5872645. doi: 10.1155/2020/5872645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global epidemiology of stroke and access to acute ischemic stroke interventions . Neurology. 2021;20 Supplement 2(97):S6–16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunst MM, Schaefer PW. Ischemic stroke. Radiologic Clinics. 2011;1(49):1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sacco RL. Risk factors and outcomes for ischemic stroke. Neurology. 1995;2 Suppl 1(45):S10–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hankey GJ. Potential new risk factors for ischemic stroke: what is their potential. . Stroke. 2006;8(37):2181–8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000229883.72010.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andersen KK, Olsen TS, Dehlendorff C, Kammersgaard LP. Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors . Stroke. 2009;6(40):2068–72. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis PH, Dambrosia JM, Schoenberg BS, Schoenberg DG, Pritchard DA, Lilienfeld AM, Whisnant JP. Risk factors for ischemic stroke: a prospective study in Rochester, Minnesota . Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society . 1987;3(22):319–27. doi: 10.1002/ana.410220307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ohira T, Shahar E, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, Mosley Jr, Folsom AR. Risk factors for ischemic stroke subtypes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study . Stroke. 2006;10(37):2493–8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000239694.19359.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simons LA, McCallum J, Friedlander Y, Simons J. Risk factors for ischemic stroke: Dubbo Study of the elderly . Stroke. 1998;7(29):1341–6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.7.1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia-Cazares R, Merlos-Benitez M, Marquez-Romero JM. Role of the physical examination in the determination of etiology of ischemic stroke . Neurology India. 2020;2(68):282–282. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.284386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ali LK, Saver JL. The ischemic stroke patient who worsens: new assessment and management approaches . Reviews in neurological diseases. 2007;2(4):85–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Seyedsaadat SM, Neuhaus AA, Pederson JM, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Kallmes DF. Location-specific ASPECTS paradigm in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis . American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;11(41):2020–2026. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chalos V, van der, Lingsma HF, Mulder MJ, Venema E, Dijkland SA, Berkhemer OA, Yoo AJ, Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Yeatts SD. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: an alternative primary outcome measure for trials of acute treatment for ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2020;1(51):282–90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zöllner JP, Misselwitz B, Kaps M, Stein M, Konczalla J, Roth C, Krakow K, Steinmetz H, Rosenow F, Strzelczyk A. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission predicts acute symptomatic seizure risk in ischemic stroke: a population-based study involving 135,117 cases . Scientific Reports. 2020;1(10):3779–3779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60628-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Safouris A, Palaiodimou L, Nardai S, Kargiotis O, Magoufis G, Psychogios K. Medical Management Versus Endovascular Treatment for Large-Vessel Occlusion Anterior Circulation Stroke With Low NIHSS . Stroke. 2023:043937–043937. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heldner MR, Zubler C, Mattle HP, Schroth G, Weck A, Mono ML, Gralla J, Jung S, El-Koussy M, Lüdi R, Yan X. National Institutes of Health stroke scale score and vessel occlusion in 2152 patients with acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2013;4(44):1153–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Radhiana H, Syazarina SO, Shahizon Azura, Hilwati H, Sobri MA. Non-contrast computed tomography in acute ischaemic stroke: a pictorial review . Med J Malaysia. 2013;1(68):93–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin SY, Chiang PL, Chen PW, Cheng LH, Chen MH, Chang PC, Lin WC, Chen YS. Toward automated segmentation for acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography . International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery . 2022;4(17):661–71. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02570-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. El-Hariri H, Neto LA, Cimflova P, Bala F, Golan R, Sojoudi A, Duszynski C, Elebute I, Mousavi SH, Qiu W, Menon BK. Evaluating nnU-Net for early ischemic change segmentation on non-contrast computed tomography in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke . Computers in biology and medicine. 2022;(141):105033–105033. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nagel S, Joly O, Pfaff J, Papanagiotou P, Fassbender K, Reith W, Möhlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Grunwald IQ. e-ASPECTS derived acute ischemic volumes on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography images . International Journal of Stroke. 2020;9(15):995–1001. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tolhuisen ML, Ponomareva E, Boers AM, Jansen IG, Koopman MS, Sales Barros, Berkhemer OA, van Zwam, van der, Majoie CB, Marquering HA. A convolutional neural network for anterior intra-arterial thrombus detection and segmentation on non-contrast computed tomography of patients with acute ischemic stroke . Applied Sciences. 2020;14(10):4861–4861. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aktar M, Xiao Y, Tampieri D, Rivaz H, Kersten-Oertel M. A Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Approach to Assess Collateral Circulation in Ischemic Stroke on Non-contrast Computed Tomography . Springer International Publishing,InMultimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support and Clinical Image-Based Procedures: 10th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2020, and 9th International Workshop, CLIP 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, 2020, . Proceedings:24–33. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nishio M, Koyasu S, Noguchi S, Kiguchi T, Nakatsu K, Akasaka T, Yamada H, Itoh K. Automatic detection of acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography and two-stage deep learning model . Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2020;(196):105711–105711. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bill O, Faouzi M, Meuli R, Maeder P, Wintermark M, Michel P. Added value of multimodal computed tomography imaging: analysis of 1994 acute ischaemic strokes . European journal of neurology. 2017;1(24):167–74. doi: 10.1111/ene.13173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dobshik AV, Verbitskiy SK, Pestunov IA, Sherman KM, Sinyavskiy YN, Tulupov AA, Berikov VB. Acute ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in non-contrast CT images using 3D convolutional neural networks . arXiv preprint arXiv. 2023:230106793–230106793. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuang H, Qiu W, Najm M, Dowlatshahi D, Mikulik R, Poppe AY, Puig J, Castellanos M,Sohn, Ahn SH, Calleja A. Validation of an automated ASPECTS method on non-contrast computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients . International journal of stroke. 2020;5(15):528–34. doi: 10.1177/1747493019895702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qazi S, Qazi E, Wilson AT, McDougall C, Al-Ajlan F, Evans J, Gensicke H, Hill MD, Lee T, Goyal M, Demchuk AM. Identifying thrombus on non-contrast CT in patients with acute ischemic stroke . Diagnostics. 2021;10(11):1919–1919. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Davis DP, Robertson T, Imbesi SG. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke . The Journal of emergency medicine. 2006;3(31):269–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Koome M, Churilov L, Chen Z, Chen Z, Naylor J, Thevathasan A, Yan B, Kwan P. Computed tomography perfusion as a diagnostic tool for seizures after ischemic stroke . Neuroradiology. 2016;(58):577–84. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1670-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ospel JM, Singh N, Marko M, Almekhlafi M, Dowlatshahi D, Puig J, Demchuk A, Coutts SB, Hill MD, Menon BK, Goyal M. Prevalence of ipsilateral nonstenotic carotid plaques on computed tomography angiography in embolic stroke of undetermined source . Stroke. 2020;6(51):1743–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Knight‐Greenfield A, Quitlong Nario, Vora A, Baradaran H, Merkler A, Navi BB, Kamel H, Gupta A. Associations between features of nonstenosing carotid plaque on computed tomographic angiography and ischemic stroke subtypes . Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;24(8):e014818–e014818. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Broocks G, Kemmling A, Meyer L, Nawabi J, Schön G, Fiehler J, Kniep H, Hanning U. Computed tomography angiography collateral profile is directly linked to early edema progression rate in acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2019;12(50):3424–30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kauw F, Dankbaar JW, Martin BW, Ding VY, Boothroyd DB, van Ommen, de Jong, Kappelle LJ, Velthuis BK, Heit JJ, Wintermark M. Collateral status in ischemic stroke: a comparison of computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and digital subtraction angiography . Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2020;6(44):984–984. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mori T, Kasakura S, Yoshioka K. Computed tomography angiographic anatomical features for successful transbrachial insertion of a balloon guide catheter for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke . Brain Circulation. 2020;3(6):169–169. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_8_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang Y, Yang J, Feng J, Wang Y. Early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke by brain computed tomography perfusion imaging combined with head and neck computed tomography angiography on deep learning algorithm . Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2022;(2022):5373585–5373585. doi: 10.1155/2022/5373585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weiss D, Kraus B, Rubbert C, Kaschner M, Jander S, Gliem M, Lee JI, Haensch CA, Turowski B, Caspers J. Systematic evaluation of computed tomography angiography collateral scores for estimation of long-term outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke . The Neuroradiology Journal. 2019;4(32):277–86. doi: 10.1177/1971400919847182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Suh CH, Jung SC, Cho SJ, Woo DC, Oh WY, Lee JG, Kim KW. MRI for prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Acta Radiologica. 2020;7(61):964–72. doi: 10.1177/0284185119887593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Macha K, Hoelter P, Siedler G, Knott M, Schwab S, Doerfler A, Kallmünzer B, Engelhorn T. Multimodal CT or MRI for IV thrombolysis in ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset . Neurology. 2020;22(95):e2954–64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang XH, Liang HM. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Diagnostic values of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic stroke . Medicine. 2019;30(98):6709059–6709059. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wong KK, Cummock JS, Li G, Ghosh R, Xu P, Volpi JJ, Wong ST. Automatic segmentation in acute ischemic stroke: Prognostic significance of topological stroke volumes on stroke outcome . Stroke. 2022;9(53):2896–905. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee KY, Liu CC, Chen DY, Weng CL, Chiu HW, Chiang CH. Automatic detection and vascular territory classification of hyperacute staged ischemic stroke on diffusion weighted image using convolutional neural networks . Scientific Reports. 2023;1(13):404–404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27621-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tedyanto EH, Tini K, Pramana NA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke . Cureus. 2022;7(14):e27224–e27224. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Khalili N, Wang R, Garg T, Ahmed A, Hoseinyazdi M, Sair HI, Luna LP, Intrapiromkul J, Deng F, Yedavalli V. Clinical application of brain perfusion imaging in detecting stroke mimics: A review . Journal of Neuroimaging. 2023;1(33):44–57. doi: 10.1111/jon.13061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Alaya IB, Limam H, Kraiem T. Applications of artificial intelligence for DWI and PWI data processing in acute ischemic stroke: Current practices and future directions . Clinical Imaging. 2022;(81):79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dhundass S, Savatovsky J, Duron L, Fahed R, Escalard S, Obadia M, Zuber K, Metten MA, Mejdoubi M, Blanc R, Sadik JC. Improved detection and characterization of arterial occlusion in acute ischemic stroke using contrast enhanced MRA . Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;4(47):278–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsui B, Nour M, Chen I, Qiao JX, Salehi B, Yoo B, Colby GP, Salamon N, Villablanca P, Jahan R, Duckwiler G. MR angiography in assessment of collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography . Brain Sciences. 2022;9(12):1181–1181. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kesav P, Krishnavadana B, Kesavadas C, Sreedharan SE, Rajendran A, Sukumaran S, Sylaja PN. Utility of intracranial high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating intracranial vasculopathic diseases causing ischemic stroke . Neuroradiology. 2019;(61):389–96. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02157-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schirmer MD, Dalca AV, Sridharan R, Giese AK, Donahue KL, Nardin MJ, Mocking SJ, McIntosh EC, Frid P, Wasselius J, Cole JW. White matter hyperintensity quantification in large-scale clinical acute ischemic stroke cohorts–The MRI-GENIE study . NeuroImage: Clinical. 2019;(23):101884–101884. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bu N, Khlif MS, Lemmens R, Wouters A, Fiebach JB, Chamorro A, Ringelstein EB, Norrving B, Laage R, Grond M, Wilms G. Imaging markers of brain frailty and outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2021;3(52):1004–11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Montellano FA, Ungethüm K, Ramiro L, Nacu A, Hellwig S, Fluri F, Whiteley WN, Bustamante A, Montaner J, Heuschmann PU. Role of blood-based biomarkers in ischemic stroke prognosis: a systematic review . Stroke. 2021;2(52):543–51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Harpaz D, Seet RC, Marks RS, Tok AI. Blood-based biomarkers are associated with different ischemic stroke mechanisms and enable rapid classification between cardioembolic and atherosclerosis etiologies . Diagnostics. 2020;10(10):804–804. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Broersen LH, Siegerink B, Sperber PS, von Rennenberg, Piper SK, Nolte CH, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, Scheitz JF, Liman TG. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and cognitive function in patients with ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2020;5(51):1604–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Onatsu J, Vanninen R, JÄkÄlÄ P, Mustonen P, Pulkki K, Korhonen M, Hedman M, HÖglund K, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Herukka SK. Tau, S100B and NSE as blood biomarkers in acute cerebrovascular events . in vivo. 2020;5(34):2577–86. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rahmati M, Azarpazhooh MR, Ehteram H, Ferns GA, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ghannadan H, Mobarra N. The elevation of S100B and downregulation of circulating miR-602 in the sera of ischemic stroke (IS) patients: the emergence of novel diagnostic and prognostic markers . Neurological Sciences. 2020;(41):2185–92. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04323-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kumar A, Misra S, Yadav AK, Sagar R, Verma B, Grover A, Prasad K. Role of glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in differentiating intracerebral haemorrhage from ischaemic stroke and stroke mimics: a meta-analysis . Biomarkers. 2020;1(25):1–8. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2019.1691657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gao L, Xie J, Zhang H, Zheng H, Zheng W, Pang C, Cai Y, Deng B. Neuron-specific enolase in hypertension patients with acute ischemic stroke and its value forecasting long-term functional outcomes . BMC geriatrics. 2023;1(23):294–294. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03986-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li Y, Han X, Luo S, Huang H, Huang X, Li M, Huang Y, Chen Y, Wu Z. Predictive value of longitudinal changes of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in acute ischemic stroke . Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022;(14):952038–952038. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.952038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Totan M, Antonescu E, Catana MG, Cernusca-Mitariu MM, Duica L, Roman-Filip C. C-reactive protein-A predictable biomarker in ischemic stroke . Rev Chim. 2019;(70):2290–3. [Google Scholar]
  62. McCabe JJ, O’reilly E, Coveney S, Collins R, Healy L, McManus J, Mulcahy R, Moynihan B, Cassidy T, Hsu F, Worrall B. Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and risk of recurrence after ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis . European stroke journal. 2021;1(6):62–71. doi: 10.1177/2396987320984003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yu B, Yang P, Xu X, Shao L. C-reactive protein for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis . Bioscience reports. 2019;2(39):BSR20181135–BSR20181135. doi: 10.1042/BSR20181135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pîrlog BO, Grotta JC. The Applicability of Thromboelastography in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Literature Review . InSeminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2022;7(48):842–849. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1753529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Levine SR. Hypercoagulable states and stroke: a selective review . CNS spectrums. 2005;7(10):567–78. doi: 10.1017/s109285290001021x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tziomalos K, Athyros VG, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP. Dyslipidemia as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;14(9):1291–7. doi: 10.2174/156802609789869628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kruyt ND, Biessels GJ, DeVries JH, Roos YB. Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: pathophysiology and clinical management . Nature Reviews Neurology. 2010;3(6):145–55. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lasek-Bal A, Holecki M, Kret B, Hawrot-Kawecka A, Duława J. Evaluation of influence of chronic kidney disease and sodium disturbances on clinical course of acute and sub-acute stage first-ever ischemic stroke . Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research . 2014;(20):1389–1389. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Della-Morte D, Guadagni F, Palmirotta R, Testa G, Caso V, Paciaroni M, Abete P, Rengo F, Ferroni P, Sacco RL, Rundek T. Genetics of ischemic stroke, stroke-related risk factors, stroke precursors and treatments . Pharmacogenomics. 2012;5(13):595–613. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Meschia JF, Worrall BB, Rich SS. Genetic susceptibility to ischemic stroke. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2011;7(7):369–78. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Bautista LE, Sharma P. Meta-analysis of genetic studies in ischemic stroke: thirty-two genes involving approximately 18 000 cases and 58 000 controls . Archives of neurology. 2004;11(61):1652–61. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.11.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Bentley P, Peck G, Smeeth L, Whittaker J, Sharma P. Causal relationship of susceptibility genes to ischemic stroke: comparison to ischemic heart disease and biochemical determinants . PloS one. 2010;2(5):e9136–e9136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Drescher MJ, Spence A, Rockwell D, Staff I, Smally AJ. Point-of-care testing for coagulation studies in a stroke protocol: a time-saving innovation . The American journal of emergency medicine. 2011;1(29):82–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Harpaz D, Eltzov E, Seet RC, Marks RS, Tok AI. Point-of-care-testing in acute stroke management: an unmet need ripe for technological harvest . Biosensors. 2017;3(7):30–30. doi: 10.3390/bios7030030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Green TL, Mansoor A, Newcommon N, Stephenson C, Stewart E, Hill MD. Reliability of point-of-care testing of INR in acute stroke . Canadian journal of neurological sciences. 2008;3(35):348–51. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100008945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kandimalla J, Vellipuram AR, Rodriguez G, Maud A, Cruz-Flores S, Khatri R. Role of telemedicine in prehospital stroke care. Current Cardiology Reports. 2021;6(23):71–71. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01473-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. English SW, Barrett KM, Freeman WD, Demaerschalk BM. Telemedicine-enabled ambulances and mobile stroke units for prehospital stroke management . Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2022;6(28):458–63. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211047744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tan E, Gao L, Tran HN, Cadilhac D, Bladin C, Moodie M. Telestroke for acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review of economic evaluations and a de novo cost–utility analysis for a middle income country . Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2021:1357633X211032407–1357633X211032407. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211032407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Blech B, O'carroll CB, Zhang N, Demaerschalk BM. Telestroke program participation and improvement in door-to-needle times . Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;4(26):406–10. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang D, Shi L, Ido MS, Green DE, Li Y, Su D, Hess DC. Impact of participation in a telestroke network on clinical outcomes: evidence from the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry . Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2019;1(12):e005147–e005147. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Bat-Erdene BO, Saver JL. Automatic acute stroke symptom detection and emergency medical systems alerting by mobile health technologies: A review . Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2021;7(30):105826–105826. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schimpf B, Deanda K, Severenuk DA, Montgomery TM, Cooley GD, Kowalski RG, Vela-Duarte D, Jones WJ. Integration of real-time electronic health records and wireless technology in a mobile stroke unit . Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2019;9(28):2530–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yaeger KA, Shoirah H, Kellner CP, Fifi J, Mocco J. Emerging technologies in optimizing pre-intervention workflow for acute stroke . Neurosurgery. 2019;suppl_1(85):S9–17. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Xiong Y, Wakhloo AK, Fisher M. Advances in acute ischemic stroke therapy. Circulation research. 2022;8(130):1230–51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zamanlu M, Eskandani M, Barar J, Jaymand M, Pakchin PS, Farhoudi M. Enhanced thrombolysis using tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-loaded PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles for ischemic stroke . Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019;(53):101165–101165. [Google Scholar]
  86. Yang N, Lee H, Wu C. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: From alteplase to tenecteplase . Brain Circulation. 2023;2(9):61–3. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_70_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Grotta JC. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke . CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2023;2(29):425–42. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Campbell BC, Nguyen TN. Advances in stroke: treatments-interventional. Stroke. 2022;1(53):264–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tsivgoulis G, Kargiotis O, De Marchis, Kohrmann M, Sandset EC, Karapanayiotides T, Sousa DA, Sarraj A, Safouris A, Psychogios K, Vadikolias K. Off-label use of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a critical appraisal of randomized and real-world evidence . Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2021;(14):1756286421997368–1756286421997368. doi: 10.1177/1756286421997368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. WU L, LU Q, HE X, GUO Q, WANG H, DENG B. Advances in safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for post-stroke stroke patients based on multi-modal MRI . Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy. 2020:505–9. [Google Scholar]
  91. Warach SJ, Dula AN, Milling Jr. Tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2020;11(51):3440–51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Potla N, Ganti L, Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review . International journal of emergency medicine. 2022;1(15):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00399-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhong CS, Beharry J, Salazar D, Smith K, Withington S, Campbell BC, Wilson D, Le Heron, Mason D, Duncan R, Reimers J. Routine use of tenecteplase for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2021;3(52):1087–90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ospel JM, Dmytriw AA, Regenhardt RW, Patel AB, Hirsch JA, Kurz M. Recent developments in pre-hospital and in-hospital triage for endovascular stroke treatment . Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2022:0184–0184. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2021-018547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Robbins BT, Howington GT, Swafford K, Zummer J, Woolum JA. Advancements in the management of acute ischemic stroke: A narrative review . Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open. 2023;1(4):e12896–e12896. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ebinger M, Siegerink B, Kunz A, Wendt M, Weber JE, Schwabauer E, Geisler F, Freitag E, Lange J, Behrens J, Erdur H. Association between dispatch of mobile stroke units and functional outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin . Jama. 2021;5(325):454–66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Fassbender K, Merzou F, Lesmeister M, Walter S, Grunwald IQ, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Bertsch T, Grotta J. Impact of mobile stroke units. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2021;8(92):815–22. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Jadhav AP, Desai SM, Jovin TG. Indications for mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: current guidelines and beyond . Neurology. 2021;20 Supplement 2(97):S126–36. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Podlasek A, Dhillon PS, Butt W, Grunwald IQ, England TJ. Direct mechanical thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis versus bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . International Journal of Stroke. 2021;6(16):621–31. doi: 10.1177/17474930211021353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Texakalidis P, Giannopoulos S, Karasavvidis T, Rangel-Castilla L, Rivet DJ, Reavey-Cantwell J. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of stent retrievers vs direct aspiration vs a combined approach . Neurosurgery. 2020;4(86):464–77. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Hu C, Zhao W, Zhang Z, Li W. A direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) versus stent retriever for acute ischemic stroke (AIS): a systematic review and meta-analysis . Journal of Neurology. 2021:1–3. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10284-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu R, Jin C, Wang L, Yang Y, Fan Y, Wang W. Simulation of stent retriever thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke by finite element analysis . Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 2022;7(25):740–9. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1976761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Vidale S, Romoli M, Consoli D, Agostoni EC. Bridging versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a subgroup pooled meta-analysis for time of intervention, eligibility, and study design . Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2020;2(49):223–32. doi: 10.1159/000507844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Aburto-Murrieta Y, Méndez B, Marquez-Romero JM. Extended time window mechanical thrombectomy for pediatric acute ischemic stroke . Journal of Central Nervous System Disease. 2022;(14):11795735221098140–11795735221098140. doi: 10.1177/11795735221098140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Rudilosso S, Urra X, Amaro S, Llull L, Renú A, Laredo C, Obach V, Chamorro Á. Timing and relevance of clinical improvement after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2019;6(50):1467–72. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ansari J, Triay R, Kandregula S, Adeeb N, Cuellar H, Sharma P. Endovascular intervention in acute ischemic stroke: history and evolution . Biomedicines. 2022;2(10):418–418. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Vishnu VY, Srivastava MP. Innovations in acute stroke reperfusion strategies . Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2019;1(22):6–6. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_263_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Vargas J, Blalock J, Venkatraman A, Anagnostakou V, King RM, Ewing JA, Gounis MJ, Turner RD, Chaudry I, Turk A. Efficacy of beveled tip aspiration catheter in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke . Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2021;9(13):823–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Guerrero WR, Al Kasab, Samaniego EA. Mechanical Thrombectomy: Emerging Devices and Technologies . Acute Stroke Management in the Era of Thrombectomy. 2019:71–85. [Google Scholar]
  110. Osanai T, Ito Y, Ushikoshi S, Aoki T, Kawabori M, Fujiwara K, Ogasawara K, Tokairin K, Maruichi K, Nakayama N, Kazumata K. Efficacy of ‘drive and retrieve’as a cooperative method for prompt endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke . Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2019;8(11):757–61. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Goyal M, Almekhlafi M, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Muir K, Demchuk AM, Bracard S, Davalos A, Guillemin F, Jovin TG, Menon BK. Rapid alteplase administration improves functional outcomes in patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusions: Meta-analysis of the noninterventional arm from the HERMES collaboration . Stroke. 2019;3(50):645–51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Gu HQ, Rao ZZ, Yang X, Wang CJ, Zhao XQ, Wang YL, Liu LP, Wang CY, Liu C, Li H, Li ZX. Use of emergency medical services and timely treatment among ischemic stroke: findings from the China stroke center alliance . Stroke. 2019;4(50):1013–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Yin X, Yang T, Gong Y, Zhou Y, Li W, Song X, Wang M, Hu B, Lu Z. Determinants of emergency medical services utilization among acute ischemic stroke patients in Hubei Province in China . Stroke. 2016;3(47):891–4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kogan E, Twyman K, Heap J, Milentijevic D, Lin JH, Alberts M. Assessing stroke severity using electronic health record data: a machine learning approach . BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2020;(20):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1010-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Waddell KJ, Myers LJ, Perkins AJ, Sico JJ, Sexson A, Burrone L, Taylor S, Koo B, Daggy JK, Bravata DM. Development and validation of a model predicting mild stroke severity on admission using electronic health record data . Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2023;9(32):107255–107255. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Rabinovich EP, Capek S, Kumar JS, Park MS. Tele-robotics and artificial-intelligence in stroke care . Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2020;(79):129–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lui YW, Chang PD, Zaharchuk G, Barboriak DP, Flanders AE, Wintermark M, Hess CP, Filippi CG. Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: current status and future directions . American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;8(41):E52–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shlobin NA, Baig AA, Waqas M, Patel TR, Dossani RH, Wilson M, Cappuzzo JM, Siddiqui AH, Tutino VM, Levy EI. Artificial intelligence for large-vessel occlusion stroke: a systematic review . World neurosurgery. 2022;(159):207–20. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Noorian AR, Hosseini MB, Avila G, Gerardi R, Andrle AF, Su M, Starkman S, Saver JL, Sharma LK. Use of wearable technology in remote evaluation of acute stroke patients: feasibility and reliability of a Google Glass-based device . Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2019;10(28):104258–104258. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Jung S, Lee HA, Kang IS, Shin SH, Chang Y, Woo Shin, Park MS, Kim YD, Nam HS, Heo JH, Kim TH. Clinical implications of atrial fibrillation detection using wearable devices in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CANDLE-AF) trial: Design and rationale . Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;(9):837958–837958. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.837958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Motolese F, Capone F, Magliozzi A, Vico C, Iaccarino G, Falato E, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro. A smart devices based secondary prevention program for cerebrovascular disease patients . Frontiers in Neurology. 2023;(14):1176744–1176744. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1176744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Barthels D, Das H. Current advances in ischemic stroke research and therapies . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease. 2020;4(1866):165260–165260. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zamanlu M, Farhoudi M, Eskandani M, Mahmoudi J, Barar J, Rafi M, Omidi Y. Recent advances in targeted delivery of tissue plasminogen activator for enhanced thrombolysis in ischaemic stroke . Journal of drug targeting. 2018;2(26):95–109. doi: 10.1080/1061186X.2017.1365874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhou Z, Lu J, Liu WW, Manaenko A, Hou X, Mei Q, Huang JL, Tang J, Zhang JH, Yao H, Hu Q. Advances in stroke pharmacology. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;(191):23–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Aghamiri H, Paybast S, Lima BS, Mansoori B. New advances in acute ischemic stroke management. International Clinical Neuroscience Journal. 2020;2(7):55–60. [Google Scholar]
  126. Nishijima H, Kon T, Ueno T, Haga R, Yamazaki K, Yagihashi K, Funamizu Y, Arai A, Suzuki C, Nunomura JI, Baba M. Effect of educational television commercial on pre-hospital delay in patients with ischemic stroke . Neurological Sciences. 2016;(37):105–9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2372-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Maalouf E, Hallit S, Salameh P, Hosseini H. Eating behaviors, lifestyle, and ischemic stroke: a Lebanese case-control study . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2023;2(20):1487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Galen Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of SalviaPub

RESOURCES