Abstract
Effective pain management in Emergency Departments (EDs) is vital for improving patient comfort and clinical outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current pain management practices in ED settings, focusing on the challenges and opportunities for optimization. The review examines pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management strategies, evaluating their effectiveness and identifying inconsistencies and gaps in current practices. Key challenges in the ED environment include time constraints, variability in clinical protocols, and the need to address diverse patient needs, including those of paediatric, geriatric, and chronic pain patients. The review highlights the importance of standardized pain assessment tools and protocols to improve consistency in pain management. Innovations, such as technological advances and multimodal approaches, are explored for their potential to enhance pain management practices. Recommendations address identified challenges, including improved training for ED staff, the development of evidence-based protocols, and the integration of multimodal pain management strategies. By addressing these areas, the review aims to contribute to the development of more effective and uniform pain management practices in emergency care, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and experiences. This review emphasizes the need for ongoing research and adaptation of best practices to meet the evolving needs of patients in emergency settings.
Keywords: emergency departments, multimodal approaches, non-pharmacologic interventions, pain assessment, pain management, pharmacologic interventions
Introduction and background
Pain management is a fundamental aspect of care in Emergency Departments (EDs), where patients frequently present with acute and often severe pain stemming from a variety of causes [1]. The primary objective in these high-pressure environments is to provide rapid and effective relief to enhance patient comfort and facilitate prompt recovery. Effective pain management not only alleviates suffering but also plays a crucial role in improving overall clinical outcomes [2]. Properly managed pain can mitigate the psychological stress and anxiety associated with acute injuries and illnesses, which can, in turn, support quicker physical recovery and enhance the patient’s overall experience in the ED [3].
Despite its importance, pain management in the ED setting is fraught with challenges. The fast-paced nature of emergency care, characterized by high patient volumes and diverse case presentations, imposes significant time constraints on medical staff [4]. These constraints can limit the depth of pain assessment and the ability to implement comprehensive pain management strategies [5]. Furthermore, the variability in clinical practices and protocols among different EDs can lead to inconsistencies in assessing and managing pain. These challenges necessitate a thorough examination of current practices to identify potential areas for improvement and ensure that patients receive the best possible care [5].
This review aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive analysis of pain management practices in EDs. It seeks to achieve several key goals. First, it aims to assess current practices by evaluating the effectiveness of existing pain management strategies, including pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions applied in the ED setting. By examining these practices, the review will shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of current approaches.
Review
Overview of pain management strategies
Pain management strategies can be broadly divided into pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, emphasizing multimodal approaches that integrate various methods for enhanced outcomes [6]. Pharmacologic interventions primarily consist of analgesics, which are categorized into three main types: opioids, non-opioids, and adjuvants. Opioids are effective for managing moderate to severe pain, particularly in acute settings [7]. However, their use is associated with significant risks, including addiction and various adverse effects, necessitating careful consideration and monitoring. Non-opioid analgesics, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen, are typically the first-line treatments for mild to moderate pain due to their more favourable safety profile compared to opioids [8,9]. Research indicates that multimodal analgesia - combining different classes of analgesics - can offer superior pain relief while minimizing side effects associated with higher doses of individual medications. Combining NSAIDs with opioids can enhance overall pain control and allow for reduced opioid doses, thus decreasing the risk of opioid-related adverse effects [10]. Non-pharmacologic interventions are also integral to pain management. Physical therapy aids in managing pain through movement and rehabilitation, particularly for chronic pain conditions. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is another effective method, helping patients manage pain by altering their perceptions and responses to pain stimuli [11]. Multimodal pain management emphasizes the use of multiple analgesic agents that target different pain pathways. This strategy aims to improve pain relief and reduce reliance on opioids. By integrating pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, healthcare providers can tailor pain management strategies to individual patient needs, enhancing efficacy and safety [10]. Evidence suggests that multimodal approaches lead to better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and reduced incidence of side effects. For instance, combining regional anaesthesia with systemic analgesics has been shown to decrease postoperative pain and opioid use in surgical patients [10]. Furthermore, a multimodal approach allows for personalization based on the patient’s pain profile, preferences, and clinical situation, ultimately improving patient satisfaction and outcomes [10]. An overview of pain management strategies in emergency care is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Overview of pain management strategies in emergency care.
NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Pain management strategy | Description | Common medications/techniques | Indications | Advantages | Limitations |
Pharmacological management [9] | Use of medications to alleviate pain through various mechanisms such as NSAIDs, opioids, and local anaesthetics. | NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen); opioids (e.g., morphine, fentanyl); local Anaesthetics (e.g., lidocaine) | Acute and chronic pain | Quick relief, variety of drugs for different pain levels | Risk of side effects, dependency (opioids), overdose risks |
Non-pharmacological management [12] | Non-drug interventions to control pain, focusing on behavioural or physical therapy methods | Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), physical therapy, acupuncture, TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) | Chronic pain, adjunct to pharmacological treatment | No drug-related side effects, long-term pain management | It may require multiple sessions, not immediately effective |
Multimodal analgesia [13] | Combination of different analgesics or interventions to target pain via multiple pathways | NSAIDs + opioids, local anaesthetics + NSAIDs, physical therapy + pharmacological interventions | Acute postoperative pain, severe trauma | Synergistic effect, reduced doses of opioids, improved outcomes | Requires careful coordination, higher complexity in management |
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) [14] | Allows patients to self-administer preset doses of pain medication, typically opioids, within safety limits | IV morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone | Postoperative pain, severe acute pain | Provides autonomy to patients, more immediate pain relief | Risk of overuse, potential opioid side effects |
Regional anaesthesia [15] | Injection of local anaesthetics near nerves to block pain in specific areas, often used during surgery or for chronic pain | Epidural anaesthesia, peripheral nerve blocks, spinal anaesthesia | Surgical pain, labour pain, chronic localized pain | Effective localized pain control avoids systemic side effects of opioids | Requires specialized skills, risk of nerve damage |
Sedation and Anaesthesia [16] | Use of sedation or general anaesthesia to manage pain and anxiety, especially in severe acute cases or during procedures | Propofol, ketamine, midazolam | Severe acute pain, procedural pain | Excellent control over severe pain reduces anxiety | Requires close monitoring, potential respiratory and cardiovascular complications |
Topical analgesia [17] | Use creams, patches, or gels with pain-relieving properties applied directly to the skin | Lidocaine patches, capsaicin cream, diclofenac gel | Localized pain, neuropathic pain, minor injuries | Minimally invasive, localized effect without systemic side effects | Limited effectiveness for severe or deep pain |
Current practices in pain management
Pain management strategies are typically categorized into pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches, with an increasing emphasis on multimodal methods that integrate various techniques to improve outcomes [6]. Pharmacologic interventions primarily involve the use of analgesics, which are classified into three major categories: opioids, non-opioids, and adjuvants. Opioids are effective for managing moderate to severe pain, particularly in acute settings, but their use carries significant risks, including addiction and adverse effects, requiring careful monitoring and consideration [6]. Non-opioid analgesics, such as NSAIDs and acetaminophen, are often the first-line treatment for mild to moderate pain due to their more favourable safety profile compared to opioids. Adjuvant medications, including gabapentinoids, antidepressants, and local anaesthetics, can enhance pain relief when combined with primary analgesics. These agents act on different pain pathways, reducing the need for opioids and thereby lowering associated risks [9]. Research supports that multimodal analgesia, which combines different classes of analgesics, can provide superior pain relief while minimizing side effects typically caused by higher doses of a single medication. For example, combining NSAIDs with opioids enhances overall pain control and allows for lower opioid doses, thus reducing the risk of opioid-related adverse effects [10]. Non-pharmacologic interventions also play a vital role in pain management. Physical therapy, for instance, assists in pain relief through movement and rehabilitation, particularly for chronic pain conditions [18]. CBT is another effective intervention, helping patients manage pain by altering their perceptions and responses to pain stimuli. Moreover, alternative therapies, such as acupuncture, massage, relaxation techniques, meditation, and breathing exercises, can provide significant relief and enhance the overall pain management experience. Simple methods, like heat or cold, also manage acute pain by reducing inflammation and improving blood circulation [18]. Multimodal pain management emphasizes the simultaneous use of multiple analgesics that target different pain pathways. This approach aims to optimize pain relief while reducing opioid dependency. By integrating pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies, healthcare providers can tailor pain management to each patient's individual needs, enhancing both efficacy and safety [10]. Evidence suggests that multimodal approaches result in better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and fewer side effects. Combining regional anaesthesia with systemic analgesics has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use in surgical patients. This approach also allows personalized treatment based on the patient's pain profile, preferences, and clinical condition, improving overall patient satisfaction and outcomes [10].
Challenges and barriers
Optimizing pain management in EDs presents several challenges and barriers that must be addressed to ensure effective and safe patient care. These challenges can be classified into operational, clinical, and patient-related factors [19]. Operational challenges are a major concern in EDs. Time constraints are paramount; the fast-paced environment often limits thorough pain assessment and management time. Clinicians must make quick decisions while balancing the need for timely pain relief with the risks associated with certain analgesics [20]. This urgency can result in rushed assessments and potentially inadequate pain management. Additionally, staffing and resource limitations further complicate the situation. Many EDs operate with limited personnel and may lack the resources to implement comprehensive pain management strategies. This can affect the availability of non-pharmacological interventions and hinder the ability to provide individualized care tailored to each patient’s needs [20]. Clinical challenges also play a significant role. Variability in pain assessment and management among clinicians and different EDs can lead to inconsistent patient care. This inconsistency can result in some patients receiving inadequate treatment, while others may be overmedicated. Standardizing pain assessment and management protocols could help address this issue [21]. Furthermore, the risk of opioid misuse and addiction remains a critical concern. The opioid crisis has heightened awareness of the dangers associated with opioid prescriptions. Clinicians must carefully balance the need for effective pain management with the risks of opioid use, which can lead to addiction and other adverse outcomes. This balance adds another layer of complexity to pain management in the ED [21]. Patient-related challenges also significantly impact pain management. Many patients enter the ED with expectations of rapid pain relief, creating pressure on clinicians to prescribe opioids. However, effective communication about the risks and benefits of different analgesics is essential but can be challenging in the fast-paced ED setting [22]. Clinicians must navigate these expectations while providing appropriate and safe pain management options. Cultural and psychological factors further complicate the situation. Patients’ beliefs, past experiences with pain, and psychological conditions can influence their perception of pain and response to treatment. Addressing these factors requires a patient-centred approach that considers the individual’s unique circumstances, including their cultural background and psychological state [22]. Challenges and barriers to effective pain management are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Challenges and barriers to effective pain management.
Challenge/barrier | Description | Impact on pain management | Potential solutions |
Opioid overuse and dependence [23] | High risk of addiction and misuse associated with opioid prescriptions, leading to increased regulatory scrutiny and hesitation in prescribing | Limits the use of effective pain relief options, especially for severe pain | Implementing opioid stewardship programs, exploring non-opioid alternatives, and educating patients on safe use |
Lack of standardized protocols [24] | The absence of uniform pain management protocols across different emergency departments leads to inconsistent care | Inconsistent pain assessment and treatment across providers, resulting in variable patient outcomes | Developing and implementing standardized pain management guidelines for emergency care settings |
Underreporting of pain [25] | Patients, particularly vulnerable populations (e.g., elderly, paediatric, non-native speakers), may underreport their pain due to communication barriers or fear | Inadequate pain relief and delayed diagnosis of underlying conditions | Improved communication tools, regular pain assessments, and training for healthcare providers in pain recognition |
Time constraints in emergency departments (EDs) [26] | Emergency department (ED) personnel often face time pressure, reducing the ability to provide thorough pain assessments and individualized care | Leads to rushed assessments, insufficient pain relief, or over-reliance on quick fixes like opioids | Streamlining assessment tools, integrating rapid pain management protocols, and triaging based on pain severity |
Fear of respiratory depression [27] | Concerns about respiratory depression limit the aggressive management of pain, especially with opioids, in acute settings | Suboptimal pain control in patients at risk for complications | Training in risk management, close monitoring of high-risk patients, and using multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid reliance |
Cultural and socioeconomic barriers [28] | Cultural beliefs, socioeconomic status, and access to healthcare can affect how pain is perceived, reported, and treated | Miscommunication or misunderstanding of pain severity, limited access to adequate pain care for underprivileged populations | Cultural competency training, equitable access to care, and considering social determinants in pain management plans |
Overcrowding in EDs [29] | Overcrowding in emergency departments can delay timely pain management interventions | Delayed treatment, patient dissatisfaction, and prolonged pain in acute scenarios | Improving ED workflows, prioritizing pain relief in triage systems, and incorporating fast-acting interventions |
Limited use of non-pharmacological methods [30] | Lack of awareness or training in non-pharmacological approaches such as physical therapy, acupuncture, or psychological support for pain management | Over-reliance on medications, missing out on effective adjunct therapies that could improve patient outcomes | Increasing training and awareness, integrating multidisciplinary approaches to pain management in the ED |
Patient expectations [31] | Patients may expect immediate pain relief, often through medications, putting pressure on providers to prescribe potent analgesics like opioids | This may lead to over-prescription of opioids or dissatisfaction with slower-acting alternatives | Setting realistic expectations, educating patients on pain relief timelines, and promoting multimodal pain management |
Inadequate pain assessment tools [32] | Existing pain assessment tools may not fully capture the patient’s pain experience, especially in cases of chronic or complex pain syndromes | Misunderstanding of pain severity, leading to under-treatment or overtreatment | Developing more nuanced pain assessment tools, particularly for non-verbal patients and those with complex conditions |
Innovations and emerging practices
Innovations and emerging practices in pain management, especially within EDs, are significantly driven by technological advancements, new medications and techniques, and ongoing research. These developments aim to improve patient outcomes and address the complexities of managing acute pain more effectively [33]. Technological advancements have dramatically transformed pain assessment and management in EDs. Electronic health records (EHRs) are crucial in this evolution, offering comprehensive patient data that informs clinical decisions. Integrated decision support systems within EHRs help healthcare providers choose appropriate analgesics based on patient history, current medications, and pain severity [34]. These systems also enable timely pain reassessment, allowing for adjustments to treatment plans as the patient’s needs change. Additionally, recent innovations in pain assessment tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI), are enhancing the objectivity of pain measures. AI-driven tools can analyse physiological data and behavioural indicators, improving the accuracy of pain detection, particularly in patients who cannot self-report effectively. Automated pain tracker devices are also being piloted in EDs, allowing patients to report pain levels in real time, which enhances documentation and management [35]. Developing new medications and techniques is another key area of innovation in pain management. The pharmaceutical field is seeing the emergence of new analgesics that provide effective pain relief while minimizing the risks associated with traditional opioids [36]. These new medications target specific pain pathways, offering safer alternatives for managing acute pain in ED settings. Non-pharmacologic techniques are also gaining attention. Innovations such as movement-based pain assessments and CBT are being explored to complement traditional pain management strategies. These approaches empower patients to manage pain through physical activity and psychological support, ultimately reducing reliance on medications [36]. Ongoing research and evidence-based practices are critical in shaping pain management strategies in EDs. Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of multimodal pain management approaches that combine pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. Research supports using non-opioid analgesics as first-line treatments for many acute pain conditions, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive pain assessments to guide treatment decisions [37]. Furthermore, implementing best practices is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Guidelines recommend regular pain assessments, ideally every 15 minutes for patients in severe pain, and the use of validated pain scales to gauge pain intensity accurately. Training for ED staff on the latest pain assessment tools and management strategies is crucial to ensure adherence to these best practices [37]. Innovations and emerging practices in pain management are detailed in Table 3.
Table 3. Innovations and emerging practices in pain management.
Innovation/emerging practice | Description | Applications in pain management | Advantages | Challenges/considerations |
Personalized pain management [38] | Tailoring pain management strategies to individual patient profiles, including genetics, pain tolerance, and medication response | Chronic pain conditions, post-operative care, opioid management | Higher efficacy, reduced side effects, improved patient outcomes | Requires advanced diagnostic tools, high cost, and complex implementation |
Telemedicine for pain management [39] | Remote monitoring and consultation for pain management, allowing access to care in rural or underserved areas | Chronic pain management, follow-up care after surgeries | Increased access to specialists, convenience for patients, lower cost | Limited by internet access and technology literacy, regulatory and reimbursement issues |
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in pain prediction [40] | Using AI algorithms to predict pain levels based on vital signs, patient history, and facial expressions | Real-time pain assessment, predicting post-surgical pain severity, personalizing opioid doses | Enhanced pain prediction accuracy, earlier interventions, reduced subjectivity in pain assessments | Requires large data sets, privacy concerns, and potential biases in AI algorithms |
Multimodal analgesia optimization [41] | Further development of multimodal approaches that combine various pain relief techniques (e.g., pharmacological, physical therapy, psychological support) | Post-surgical pain, trauma, chronic pain | Reduces opioid use, more comprehensive pain relief, minimizes side effects | Requires collaboration between specialities, complex dosing regimens |
Non-opioid analgesic alternatives [42] | Development of new non-opioid pain medications such as non-opioid pain (NOP) receptor agonists, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists, and sodium channel blockers | Post-surgical pain, acute pain, chronic pain | Reduced risk of addiction, lower chance of respiratory depression | Some alternatives are still in the early stages of clinical trials, with unknown long-term effects |
Virtual reality (VR) for pain distraction [43] | The use of immersive VR environments to divert attention away from pain has proven effective in acute settings like burn treatments and physical therapy for chronic pain | Acute pain, procedural pain (e.g., wound care), physical therapy for chronic pain | Non-invasive, can be tailored to patient preferences, highly effective for reducing perception of pain | High cost of VR systems, not universally applicable for all patients, potential motion sickness |
Genetic testing for pain sensitivity [44] | Using genetic testing to identify variations in pain perception and opioid metabolism, allows for personalized pain management strategies | Chronic pain, surgical pain, opioid prescription | Personalized pain relief, reduced risk of opioid overuse or underuse | Expensive, limited availability, ethical concerns around genetic information |
Targeted drug delivery systems [45] | Innovations in drug delivery systems include transdermal patches, nanoparticle carriers, or extended-release formulations for localized and sustained pain relief | Chronic pain, cancer pain, post-surgical pain | Prolonged pain relief, reduced systemic side effects, more targeted pain control | Development and manufacturing costs, complex regulatory approvals |
Neuromodulation techniques [46] | Advanced techniques such as spinal cord stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and peripheral nerve stimulation modulate pain signals directly in the nervous system | Neuropathic pain, chronic pain, cancer pain | Effective for severe, intractable pain, non-pharmacological | High cost, requires specialized training and equipment, invasive procedures |
Stem cell therapy for pain relief [47] | Experimental use of stem cells to regenerate damaged tissue or modulate the inflammatory response, potentially reducing chronic pain | Chronic joint pain, back pain, arthritis | Potential for long-term relief, reduced reliance on medications | Still in the experimental phases, ethical concerns, and high cost, require further research |
Recommendations for optimization
Optimizing pain management in EDs is critical for improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. The following recommendations address key areas for enhancement, including pain assessment, medication practices, multimodal approaches, and systemic issues [48]. Effective pain management begins with improved pain assessment. ED staff should receive enhanced training to develop the skills and knowledge necessary for accurate pain evaluation and management [49]. This training can include regular sessions on pain assessment techniques and tools, utilizing case studies and role-playing to improve understanding and application of pain management strategies. Standardized pain assessment tools, such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, should be adopted to ensure consistency and accuracy. These tools should be integrated into EHR systems to facilitate streamlined documentation and tracking [49]. Optimizing medication practices is another crucial area. Developing and adhering to standardized protocols can enhance medication practices and improve pain management outcomes [50]. Evidence-based protocols should outline the use of non-opioid and opioid analgesics according to pain severity, with regular updates to reflect the latest research and guidelines. Educating ED staff on safe opioid use and alternative options is essential to mitigate the risk of opioid misuse while ensuring effective pain relief. Educational sessions should emphasize the risks associated with opioids, the importance of prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration, and the appropriate use of non-opioid alternatives [50]. Integrating multimodal approaches can improve pain relief and reduce opioid dependence. Utilizing a combination of analgesics, such as NSAIDs and acetaminophen, alongside adjunct therapies like physical therapy, acupuncture, or CBT, can offer a more comprehensive pain management strategy. Developing care pathways that incorporate pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic modalities for specific conditions ensures a holistic approach to pain management [11]. Addressing systemic issues is also vital for supporting effective pain management practices. Enhancing staffing and resource allocation can ensure sufficient personnel and resources to support pain management initiatives [51]. This may involve evaluating current staffing levels and patient volumes to determine the needs for additional support and advocating for increased funding or resources for pain management. Improving patient communication and education can also empower patients to be more involved in pain management. Developing educational materials that explain pain management options, potential medication side effects, and the importance of reporting pain levels, as well as fostering open communication between patients and healthcare providers, can contribute to a safer and more effective ED experience [51]. EDs can significantly improve their pain management practices by implementing these recommendations. Enhanced pain assessment, standardized medication protocols, multimodal approaches, and systemic support will improve patient outcomes and create a safer, more effective overall ED experience [52]. Recommendations for optimizing pain management practices are detailed in Table 4.
Table 4. Recommendations for optimization of pain management practices.
Recommendation | Description | Implementation strategies | Expected outcomes | Challenges |
Standardization of pain protocols [53] | Developing and implementing standardized pain assessment and management protocols across all emergency departments | Training healthcare providers on standardized guidelines, regular audits, and updates based on emerging evidence | Consistent pain relief, reduced variability in care, improved patient outcomes | Resistance to change, varied resources across healthcare facilities |
Enhanced education and training [54] | Providing ongoing education to healthcare providers on pain management techniques, including non-pharmacological approaches | Incorporating pain management modules, regular workshops, and simulations in medical and nursing education | Better pain assessment skills, more effective use of multimodal analgesia, reduced opioid reliance | Time and resource investment, ensuring all staff participate |
Promotion of multimodal analgesia [55] | Encouraging multimodal approaches combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods for comprehensive pain relief | Protocols promote combining analgesics with different mechanisms, integrating physical therapy, and counselling | Reduced opioid use, improved patient satisfaction, more effective pain control | Coordination between specialities, potential increased cost in the initial implementation |
Patient-centred pain management [56] | Focusing on individualized pain management strategies tailored to each patient’s needs and preferences, including cultural considerations | Involving patients in decision-making, using comprehensive pain assessments, and considering psychosocial factors | Improved patient satisfaction, better adherence to pain management plans, reduced underreporting of pain | Time-consuming, requires thorough assessments, potentially difficult to implement with high patient volumes |
Improved use of non-pharmacological methods [57] | Increasing the adoption of non-pharmacological approaches like physical therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, and acupuncture | Integrating multidisciplinary pain teams, improving access to alternative therapies, and educating patients on their benefits | Holistic pain management, reduced medication side effects, long-term improvement in pain control | Lack of availability, higher upfront costs, patient reluctance to adopt non-traditional methods |
Optimizing opioid prescribing practices [36] | Reducing opioid misuse by implementing opioid stewardship programs and promoting non-opioid alternatives for pain relief | Regular monitoring of opioid prescriptions, education on safe prescribing, and setting clear guidelines on opioid use | Lower rates of opioid dependency and misuse, better patient outcomes, safer prescribing practices | Resistance from providers accustomed to opioid prescribing, patient expectation of immediate pain relief |
Telemedicine for pain management [58] | Expanding telemedicine to manage chronic pain patients and provide timely follow-ups | Developing telemedicine infrastructure, training providers on virtual consultations, and ensuring accessible technology | Increased access to care, reduced patient travel burden, ongoing pain monitoring, and management in underserved areas | Technical challenges, privacy concerns, insurance and reimbursement limitations |
Improved pain assessment tools [35] | Developing more nuanced and comprehensive pain assessment tools to better capture the complexity of pain experiences | Incorporating advanced pain scales, using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven pain detection tools, and ensuring frequent reassessment | Better understanding of pain severity, improved treatment planning, more tailored pain management strategies | Development and implementation costs, ensuring healthcare provider adoption of new tools |
Addressing cultural and socioeconomic barriers [59] | Developing culturally sensitive pain management strategies and addressing socioeconomic factors that limit access to care | Training in cultural competence, ensuring equitable access to pain management resources, and addressing social determinants | Reduced health disparities, improved pain management outcomes for diverse populations | Resource-intensive requires systemic changes to address social and economic barriers |
Patient and caregiver education [60] | Providing thorough education to patients and caregivers on pain management options, safe medication use, and the role of non-drug interventions | Creating patient-friendly educational materials, incorporating pain education into discharge planning, and caregiver support | Better pain control, higher patient satisfaction, reduced risk of medication misuse | Ensuring that educational materials are accessible and understandable to all patients, requiring time for proper education |
Conclusions
In conclusion, effective pain management in EDs is crucial for alleviating patient suffering and improving clinical outcomes in high-pressure settings. This review has highlighted the critical role of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies in managing acute pain while addressing the unique challenges faced in the emergency care environment. By assessing current practices, identifying areas for improvement, and offering evidence-based recommendations, this review underscores the need for ongoing evaluation and optimization of pain management protocols. Implementing standardized, evidence-based practices and addressing operational and clinical challenges can significantly enhance the quality of care provided in EDs. Ultimately, these improvements ensure that all patients receive timely and effective pain relief, fostering better patient experiences and more favourable health outcomes. As emergency care continues to evolve, ongoing research and innovation will be essential in refining pain management strategies and addressing the dynamic needs of patients in these critical settings.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the valuable assistance provided by ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California) in offering insightful suggestions for ensuring clarity and precision in our writing with Grammarly and Paperpal to enhance the quality and accuracy of our work.
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Anmol K. Nagpal, Charuta Gadkari, Akhilesh Singh, Aditya Pundkar
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Anmol K. Nagpal, Charuta Gadkari, Akhilesh Singh, Aditya Pundkar
Drafting of the manuscript: Anmol K. Nagpal, Charuta Gadkari, Akhilesh Singh, Aditya Pundkar
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Anmol K. Nagpal, Charuta Gadkari, Akhilesh Singh, Aditya Pundkar
Supervision: Anmol K. Nagpal, Charuta Gadkari, Akhilesh Singh, Aditya Pundkar
References
- 1.Pain management in the emergency department: a review article on options and methods. Abdolrazaghnejad A, Banaie M, Tavakoli N, Safdari M, Rajabpour-Sanati A. Adv J Emerg Med. 2018;2:0. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Evaluation of different approaches for pain management in postoperative general surgery patients: a comprehensive review. Jain Y, Lanjewar R, Lamture Y, Bawiskar D. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fenske JN, Berland DW, Chandran S, et al. Ann Arbor (MI): Michigan Medicine University of Michigan; 2021. Pain Management [Internet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: are we ever going to get better? Motov SM, Khan AN. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004630/ J Pain Res. 2008;2:5–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barriers and solutions for improving pain management practices in acute hospital settings: perspectives of healthcare practitioners for a pain-free hospital initiative. Akbar N, Teo SP, Artini Hj-Abdul-Rahman HN, Hj-Husaini HA, Venkatasalu MR. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2019;23:190–196. doi: 10.4235/agmr.19.0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pharmacological methods of pain management: narrative review of medication used. Alorfi NM. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:3247–3256. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S419239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anekar AA, Hendrix JM, Cascella M. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. WHO analgesic ladder. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: a current perspective. Bindu S, Mazumder S, Bandyopadhyay U. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;180:114147. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Queremel Milani DA, Davis DD. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Pain management medications. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Designing the ideal perioperative pain management plan starts with multimodal analgesia. Schwenk ES, Mariano ER. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71:345–352. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Multimodal non-invasive non-pharmacological therapies for chronic pain: mechanisms and progress. Shi Y, Wu W. BMC Med. 2023;21:372. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03076-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Non-pharmacological treatments for pain relief: TENS and acupuncture. Coutaux A. Joint Bone Spine. 2017;84:657–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sampognaro G, Harrell R. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Multimodal postoperative pain control after orthopaedic surgery. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pastino A, Lakra A. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Patient-controlled analgesia. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Folino TB, Mahboobi SK. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Regional anesthetic blocks. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Benzoni T, Cascella M. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Procedural sedation. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Topical preparations for pain relief: efficacy and patient adherence. Jorge LL, Feres CC, Teles VE. J Pain Res. 2010;4:11–24. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S9492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Physical exercise as non-pharmacological treatment of chronic pain: why and when. Ambrose KR, Golightly YM. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Emergency nurses perceived barriers to effective pain management at emergency department in Amhara region referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Multi-center cross sectional study. Admassie BM, Lema GF, Ferede YA, Tegegne BA. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022;81:104338. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a review. Mostafa R, El-Atawi K. Cureus. 2024;16:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Acute pain assessment inadequacy in the emergency department: patients’ perspective. Hämäläinen J, Kvist T, Kankkunen P. J Patient Exp. 2022;9:2374. doi: 10.1177/23743735211049677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Management of pain in the emergency department. Thomas SH. Int Sch Res Notices. 2013;24:583132. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Prescription opioid abuse, pain and addiction: clinical issues and implications. Ling W, Mooney L, Hillhouse M. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30:300–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00271.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Factors influencing nurses' pain assessment and management of road traffic casualties: a qualitative study at a military hospital in Ghana. Tata TK, Ohene LA, Dzansi GA, Aziato L. BMC Emerg Med. 2024;24:100. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01016-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pain management in the elderly population: a review. Kaye AD, Baluch A, Scott JT. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21603375/ Ochsner J. 2010;10:179–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.CDC clinical practice guideline for prescribing opioids for pain - United States, 2022. Dowell D, Ragan KR, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Chou R. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022;71:1–95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Acute pain management for patients receiving maintenance methadone or buprenorphine therapy. Alford DP, Compton P, Samet JH. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1892816/ Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:127–134. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-2-200601170-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cultural framing and the impact on acute pain and pain services. Rogger R, Bello C, Romero CS, Urman RD, Luedi MM, Filipovic MG. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023;27:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01125-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Overcrowding in emergency department: causes, consequences, and solutions-a narrative review. Sartini M, Carbone A, Demartini A, et al. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1625. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barriers and facilitators to use of non-pharmacological treatments in chronic pain. Becker WC, Dorflinger L, Edmond SN, Islam L, Heapy AA, Fraenkel L. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0608-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Preuss CV, Kalava A, King KC. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Prescription of controlled substances: benefits and risks. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dydyk AM, Grandhe S. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Pain assessment. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Advances in pain medicine: a review of new technologies. Strand N, Maloney J, Tieppo Francio V, et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26:605–616. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01062-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Technological progress in electronic health record system optimization: systematic review of systematic literature reviews. Negro-Calduch E, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Krishnamurthy RS, Novillo-Ortiz D. Int J Med Inform. 2021;152:104507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Artificial intelligence for automatic pain assessment: research methods and perspectives. Cascella M, Schiavo D, Cuomo A, et al. Pain Res Manag. 2023;2023:6018736. doi: 10.1155/2023/6018736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Phillips JK, Ford MA, Bonnie RJ. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017. Pain Management and the Opioid Epidemic: Balancing Societal and Individual Benefits and Risks of Prescription Opioid Use. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Multimodal analgesia for chronic pain: rationale and future directions. Argoff CE, Albrecht P, Irving G, Rice F. Pain Med. 2009;10:0–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Personalized medicine and opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: opportunities and challenges. Bruehl S, Apkarian AV, Ballantyne JC, et al. J Pain. 2013;14:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Optimizing telehealth pain care after COVID-19. Tauben DJ, Langford DJ, Sturgeon JA, Rundell SD, Towle C, Bockman C, Nicholas M. Pain. 2020;161:2437–2445. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Incorporation of “artificial intelligence” for objective pain assessment: a comprehensive review. El-Tallawy SN, Pergolizzi JV, Vasiliu-Feltes I, et al. Pain Ther. 2024;13:293–317. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00584-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Multimodal analgesia as an essential part of enhanced recovery protocols in the ambulatory settings. Kaye AD, Urman RD, Rappaport Y, et al. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35:0–5. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_51_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dey S, Sanders AE, Martinez S, Kopitnik NL, Vrooman BM. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Alternatives to opioids for managing pain. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Li A, Montaño Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Pain Manag. 2011;1:147–157. doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pharmacogenetic approaches in personalized medicine for postoperative pain management. Ferreira do Couto ML, Fonseca S, Pozza DH. Biomedicines. 2024;12:729. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Recent advancement of medical patch for transdermal drug delivery. Wong WF, Ang KP, Sethi G, Looi CY. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59:778. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms. Joosten EA, Franken G. Pain. 2020;161:0–13. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stem cell therapy in pain medicine. Han YH, Kim KH, Abdi S, Kim TK. Korean J Pain. 2019;32:245–255. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wells N, Pasero C, McCaffery M. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Improving the Quality of Care Through Pain Assessment and Management. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nurses' assessment and management practices of pain among intensive care patients in King Khalid Hospital, Kharj, Riyadh. Saleh AM. Heliyon. 2023;9:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain — United States, 2016. [ Mar; 2016 ];https://cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/rr6501e1.htm. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 65:1–12. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Improving patient outcomes through effective hospital administration: a comprehensive review. Bhati D, Deogade MS, Kanyal D. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Alternatives to opioids for pain management in the emergency department decreases opioid usage and maintains patient satisfaction. Duncan RW, Smith KL, Maguire M, Stader DE. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Studying protocol-based pain management in the emergency department. Patil A, Srinivasarangan M, Ravindra P, Mundada H. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017;10:180–188. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_83_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.The impact of a 12-hour educational program on nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management: a quasi-experimental study. Innab A, Alammar K, Alqahtani N, Aldawood F, Kerari A, Alenezi A. BMC Nurs. 2022;21:250. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01028-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.A comprehensive review of postoperative analgesics used in orthopedic practice. Goel S, Deshpande SV, Jadawala VH, Suneja A, Singh R. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Patient-centered pain management communication from the patient perspective. Haverfield MC, Giannitrapani K, Timko C, Lorenz K. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:1374–1380. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4490-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Non-pharmacological interventions for the management of chronic health conditions and non-communicable diseases. Castellano-Tejedor C. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:8536. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Telemedicine, e-health, and multi-agent systems for chronic pain management. Ahmed KM, Ismail Z, Shehata IM, et al. Clin Pract. 2023;13:470–482. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cultural competence and the postoperative experience: pain control and rehabilitation. Yelton MJ, Jildeh TR. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5:100733. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Reinhard SC, Given B, Petlick NH, Bemis A. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Supporting family caregivers in providing care. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]