Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1988 Aug 1;253(3):809–818. doi: 10.1042/bj2530809

Alterations in the binding site of the cyclic AMP receptor protein at the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region.

K Gaston 1, B Chan 1, A Kolb 1, J Fox 1, S Busby 1
PMCID: PMC1149375  PMID: 2845937

Abstract

Gene manipulation techniques have been used to alter the binding site for the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) at the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli galactose (gal) operon. The effects of these changes on CRP-dependent stimulation of expression from the galP1 promoter in vivo have been measured, and gel binding assays have been used to measure the affinity of cAMP-CRP for the modified sites. Firstly we have deleted progressively longer sequences from upstream of the gal CRP site in order to locate the functional limit of the site. A deletion to -49, removing the first base that corresponds to the consensus sequence for a CRP binding site, is sufficient to reduce CRP binding and block CRP-dependent stimulation of P1. Secondly, we used synthetic oligonucleotides to invert the asymmetric nucleotide sequence at the gal CRP binding site or to make the sequence symmetric. Inversion of the site has little effect on CRP binding, the architecture of open complexes at P1 revealed by DNAase I footprinting, or the stimulation of transcription from P1. Making the site symmetric increases the affinity for CRP by over 50-fold and leads to increased transcription from P1, whilst hardly altering the DNAase I footprint of open complexes. Our results confirm that the strength of binding of CRP depends on the nature of the site and show that it is this that principally accounts for differences in CRP-dependent stimulation of transcription.

Full text

PDF
809

Images in this article

812Fig. 4.
on p.812
814Fig. 7.
on p.814
815Fig. 8.
on p.815
816Fig. 9.
on p.816

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aiba H., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11905–11910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bingham A. H., Ponnambalam S., Chan B., Busby S. Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon. Gene. 1986;41(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burgess R. R., Jendrisak J. J. A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. Biochemistry. 1975 Oct 21;14(21):4634–4638. doi: 10.1021/bi00692a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Busby S., Buc H. Positive regulation of gene expression by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Sci. 1987 Dec;4(12):371–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Busby S., Dreyfus M. Segment-specific mutagenesis of the regulatory region in the Escherichia coli galactose operon: isolation of mutations reducing the initiation of transcription and translation. Gene. 1983 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):121–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Busby S., Kotlarz D., Buc H. Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoter region. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 25;167(2):259–274. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80335-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Busby S., Spassky A., Chan B. RNA polymerase makes important contacts upstream from base pair -49 at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter. Gene. 1987;53(2-3):145–152. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casadaban M. J. Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jul 5;104(3):541–555. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(23):7274–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Mutations that alter the DNA sequence specificity of the catabolite gene activator protein of E. coli. Nature. 1984 Sep 20;311(5983):232–235. doi: 10.1038/311232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebright R. H., Kolb A., Buc H., Kunkel T. A., Krakow J. S., Beckwith J. Role of glutamic acid-181 in DNA-sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) of Escherichia coli: altered DNA-sequence-recognition properties of [Val181]CAP and [Leu181]CAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6083–6087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gent M. E., Gronenborn A. M., Davies R. W., Clore G. M. Probing the sequence-specific interaction of the cyclic AMP receptor protein with DNA by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochem J. 1987 Mar 15;242(3):645–653. doi: 10.1042/bj2420645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jansen C., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. The binding of the cyclic AMP receptor protein to synthetic DNA sites containing permutations in the consensus sequence TGTGA. Biochem J. 1987 Aug 15;246(1):227–232. doi: 10.1042/bj2460227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kolb A., Busby S., Herbert M., Kotlarz D., Buc H. Comparison of the binding sites for the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein at the lactose and galactose promoters. EMBO J. 1983;2(2):217–222. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01408.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kolb A., Spassky A., Chapon C., Blazy B., Buc H. On the different binding affinities of CRP at the lac, gal and malT promoter regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Nov 25;11(22):7833–7852. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.22.7833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu-Johnson H. N., Gartenberg M. R., Crothers D. M. The DNA binding domain and bending angle of E. coli CAP protein. Cell. 1986 Dec 26;47(6):995–1005. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90814-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lowe P. A., Hager D. A., Burgess R. R. Purification and properties of the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 1979 Apr 3;18(7):1344–1352. doi: 10.1021/bi00574a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Musso R. E., Di Lauro R., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):847–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raibaud O., Mock M., Schwartz M. A technique for integrating any DNA fragment into the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1984 Jul-Aug;29(1-2):231–241. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90183-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spassky A., Busby S., Buc H. On the action of the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex at the Escherichia coli lactose and galactose promoter regions. EMBO J. 1984 Jan;3(1):43–50. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01759.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vidal-Ingigliardi D., Raibaud O. A convenient technique to compare the efficiency of promoters in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Aug 26;13(16):5919–5926. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.16.5919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weber I. T., Steitz T. A. Model of specific complex between catabolite gene activator protein and B-DNA suggested by electrostatic complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):3973–3977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.3973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Crombrugghe B., Busby S., Buc H. Cyclic AMP receptor protein: role in transcription activation. Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):831–838. doi: 10.1126/science.6372090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES