Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Sep 9;9(10):e00850-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24

Potential of training of anti-Staphylococcus aureus therapeutic phages against Staphylococcus epidermidis multidrug-resistant isolates is restricted by inter- and intra-sequence type specificity

Camille Kolenda 1,2,, Mélanie Bonhomme 1,2, Mathieu Medina 1,2, Mateo Pouilly 1, Clara Rousseau 1, Emma Troesch 1, Patricia Martins-Simoes 1,2, Marc Stegger 3,4, Paul O Verhoeven 5,6,7, Floriane Laumay 1,2,8, Frédéric Laurent 1,2,8
Editor: Michela Gambino9
PMCID: PMC11494967  PMID: 39248470

ABSTRACT

Phage therapy appears to be a promising approach to tackle multidrug-resistant bacteria, including staphylococci. However, most anti-staphylococcal phages have been characterized in Staphylococcus aureus, while a limited number of studies investigated phage activity against S. epidermidis. We studied the potential of phage training to extend the host range of two types of anti-S. aureus phages against S. epidermidis isolates. The Appelmans protocol was applied to a mixture of Kayvirus and a mixture of Silviavirus phages repeatedly exposed to seven S. epidermidis strains representative of nosocomial-associated sequence types (ST), including the world-wide disseminated ST2. We observed increased activity only for the Kayvirus mixture against two of these strains (ST2 or ST35). Phage subpopulations isolated from the training mixture using these two strains (five/strain) exhibited different evolved phenotypes, active only against their isolation strain or strains of the same ST. Of note, 16/47 ST2 strains were susceptible to one of the groups of trained phages. A comparative genomic analysis of ancestral and trained phage genomes, conducted to identify potential bacterial determinants of such specific activity, found numerous recombination events between two of the three ancestors. However, a small number of trained phage genes had nucleotide sequence modifications impacting the corresponding protein compared to ancestral phages, two to four of them per phage genome being specific of each group of phage subpopulations exhibiting different host range. The results suggest that anti-S. aureus phages can be adapted to S. epidermidis isolates but with inter- and intra-ST specificity.

Importance

S. epidermidis is increasingly recognized as a threat for public health. Its clinical importance is notably related to multidrug resistance. Phage therapy is one of the most promising alternative therapeutic strategies to antibiotics. Nonetheless, only very few phages active against this bacterial species have been described. In the present study, we showed that phage training can be used to extend the host range of polyvalent Kayvirus phages within the Staphylococcus genera to include S. epidermidis species. In the context of rapid development of phage therapy, in vitro forced adaptation of previously characterized phages could be an appealing alternative to fastidious repeated isolation of new phages to improve the therapeutic potential of a phage collection.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, bacteriophages, phage training, host range extension, adaptation, evolution, DNA recombination, Silviavirus, Kayvirus

INTRODUCTION

Bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus are both dominant commensal microorganisms of the skin microbiome and major human pathogens. Although Staphylococcus aureus is the main life-threatening species (1), S. epidermidis is increasingly recognized as a threat, especially in the context of nosocomial and device-associated infections. It is notably responsible for up to 30% of nosocomial bacteremia and prosthetic joint infections (2, 3). The clinical importance of Staphylococcus epidermidis is related primarily to its frequent multi-resistance to antibiotics, especially methicillin resistance that is typically detected in more than 70% of the strains and can reach up to 90% of strains (4). Furthermore, its ability to form biofilms over various surfaces, in which bacteria are protected from antibiotics and the immune system, is a key trait of the species as well as a determinant of its pathogenicity (5). It is also of note that some sequence types (STs) are over-represented in infections, such as the most prominent lineage ST2 that has disseminated worldwide in the hospital environment and exhibits increased virulence and resistance compared to commensal strains (6, 7).

In this context, there is an urgent need for alternative strategies to antibiotics. Phage therapy, which relies on the use of bacteria-specific viruses called bacteriophages (or phages), is one of the most promising approaches in several aspects. First, as phages target distinct receptors from antibiotics and have different mechanisms of antibacterial activity, they can kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria but can also be used to obtain synergistic effects with antibiotics (8). Second, due to the production of specific enzymes such as depolymerases and lysins allowing penetration through the biofilm matrix, phages have the potential to eradicate bacteria, including S. epidermidis, within biofilm (9). To date, most of the anti-staphylococcal phages isolated have been characterized in S. aureus strains, while only a limited number of studies investigated phage activity against S. epidermidis strains (912). This is likely a consequence of the particularly laborious approaches needed to isolate phages against S. epidermidis (10, 13), but also of their important host range specificity within S. epidermidis or their lysogenic properties limiting their therapeutic potential (10, 12). Furthermore, as the scarce anti-S. epidermidis phages belong to very different taxonomic genera and families compared to those active against S. aureus, and as phages considered for phage therapy are required to be well characterized to ensure the safety of therapeutic products, additional studies to examine all the parameters may be required (production protocols, stability, PK/PD characteristics, immunization, etc.) (14). In this context, phage training could be an interesting alternative to classical phage isolation to expand the host range of previously characterized phages (15). It consists of in vitro-directed evolution of phages to force their natural capacity to adapt to resistant bacteria (resistant species herein) with the selection of advantageous mutations and/or recombination events; among the published methods, the Appelmans protocol seems particularly adapted as it relies on the serial expositions of mixtures of phages against resistant bacteria (15).

In the present study, we assessed the potential of phage training to enlarge the host spectrum of anti-S. aureus phages already available in our phage bank against S. epidermidis clinical isolates. We independently trained two types of mixtures containing high therapeutic potential anti-S. aureus phages belonging to two genera, i.e., Kayvirus or Silviavirus phages, against a selection of seven diverse S. epidermidis strains. We showed that, in the conditions used, only Kayvirus phages were able to adapt to S. epidermidis based on the protocol used and that inter- and intra- sequence types host range specificity was observed.

RESULTS

Phage training allows expansion of host range of Kayvirus but not Silviavirus phages to S. epidermidis and is associated with minor reduction of activity against other staphylococcal species

Two mixtures of lytic phages belonging to two genera of the Herelleviridae family (myovirus morphotype), either three Kayvirus (V1SA09, V1SA12, and V1SA15) or three Silviavirus (V1SA19, V1SA20, and V1SA22) phages (Table S1), were trained independently against eight bacterial strains, including seven S. epidermidis strains (SE-A to SE-G, Table S2) representative of different sequence types associated with nosocomial infections including the prevailing ST2 and ST5 (6, 16), and the strain used for phage production (to maintain phage titers along training passages). The ancestral phages had very limited or no activity against the selected S. epidermidis strains: phage V1SA09 was the only one active against one of the strains, SE-C with an Efficiency Of Plating (EOP) score of 0.04 (Table 1). After 30 iterative passages, we observed host range expansion only for Kayvirus phages. The observed gain of activity for the Kayvirus phages mixture occurred only for two S. epidermidis bacterial strains and at different time points along phage training, namely after passages 10 (P10) and 30 (P30) for SE-E and SE-G, respectively (Table 1). Of note, phage activity of the mixture against strain SE-E increased dramatically between P10 and P30 with EOP boosted from 0.003 to 7.

TABLE 1.

Evolution of activity of phages against S. epidermidis strains during training compared to ancestral phages measured with the spot testb

Bacterial strain Ancestral phages Phage training mixtures Phage subpopulations isolated from P30
V1SA09 V1SA12 V1SA15 P5 P10 P15 P20 P25 P30 A1-5a C1-5a E1-5a G1-5a
SC-Prod-A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1–0.3 0.1–0.6
SE-B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SE-C 0.04 0 0 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.003 0.05–0.2 0.06–0.5 0.03–0.1 0.06–0.3
SE-D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SE-E 0 0 0 0 0.003 0.5 0.1 0.5 7 0 0 1 0
SE-F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SE-G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 1
SE-H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a

All five phage subpopulations isolated either on strains A, C, E, or G exhibited similar host range.

b

Reference strains used for efficiency of plating (EOP) calculation were SC-Prod-A (strain used for ancestral phages amplification) for phage training mixtures and respective isolation strains for isolated subpopulations. Mean EOP values obtained from experiments performed in triplicate are indicated. For phage subpopulations isolated from P30 phage training mixture, range of values obtained for the five subpopulations isolated on each bacterial strain are indicated for simplification of the table.

Isolation of 20 phage sub-populations was performed using the four bacterial strains for which lytic activity was observed with the P30 phage mixture, namely, SC-Prod-A, SE-C, SE-E, and SE-G (Table 1). Five plaque-forming units (PFU) were isolated on each strain, and named A1 to A5 for those isolated on strain SC-Prod A, C1 to C5 for strain isolated on strain SE-C, etc. All five subpopulations isolated on a given strain had similar phenotypes in terms of lytic activity. The 10 subpopulations isolated on strains SC-Prod-A and SE-C (hereinafter referred to as A1-5 and C1-5 groups, respectively) had the same activity as the ancestral phage V1SA09 (no expansion of host range activity), while the 10 subpopulations isolated on strains SE-E and SE-G (named E1 to E5 and G1 to G5 hereinafter referred to as E1-5 and E1-5 groups, respectively) had extended activity against their respective isolation strain SE-E or SE-G in addition to the initial activity against strains SC-Prod-A and SE-C (Table 1).

The impact of phage training on activity against strains to which phages had never been exposed was also assessed by testing a set of clinical isolates belonging to S. epidermidis of various STs (n = 73) and a wider panel of Staphylococcus species (S. aureus, n = 30; S. capitis, n = 10; S. caprae, n = 9, S. haemolyticus, n = 7; S. lugdunensis, n = 9). Again, all five phage sub-populations isolated on a given strain had similar phenotypes. First, for S. epidermidis strains, we observed host range expansion only for groups of subpopulations E1-5 and G1-5 with activity against some strains belonging to the same ST as their isolation strains (SE-E and SE-G; Table 2; Fig. 1). Indeed, they were active against 15/47 ST2 isolates and 3/4 ST35 isolates, respectively (Table 2). Conversely, phage sub-populations A1-5 and C1-5 exhibited the same activity spectrum as ancestral phage V1SA09 without any expansion of host range. To further assess the impact of phage training on phage lytic activity, the trained phage E1 was selected as a representative of the group of phage subpopulations E1-5 for the measurement of growth inhibition (liquid assay score [LAS]) of ST2 strains in liquid medium over 24 h (multiplicity of infection [MOI = 1]) in comparison to ancestral phages (Fig. S1). For the 15 ST2 strains against which phage E1 exhibited an EOP score >0, the phage was also active in liquid medium with a mean LAS of 89%. Trained phage E1 showed activity in liquid medium against one additional strain while displaying an EOP score of 0. Finally, we observed no impact of training using S. epidermidis strains on the activity against other staphylococcal species, and even a loss of activity of trained phage subpopulations against few strains compared to the ancestral phage with the most narrow host spectrum. For instance, trained phage subpopulations E1-5 were active against 2 out of 9 S. lugdunensis strains or 3 out of 30 S. aureus strains while ancestral phages were active at least against four out of nine or four out of thirty of these same strains (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Comparison of activity of ancestral and trained phages against a large panel of strains belonging to six Staphylococcus species measured using the spot teste

Bacterial species Ancestral phages Phage subpopulations isolated from P30 mixture
V1SA09 V1SA12 V1SA15 A1-5a C1-5a E1-5a G1-5a
S. epidermidis
 ST2 (n = 47)b 1 0 0 1 1 15 1
 ST35 (n = 4)c 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
 Other (n = 22) 4d 0 0 4d 4d 4d 4d
S. aureus (n = 30) 14 16 4 14 14 3 13
S. capitis (n = 10) 10 9 10 10 10 10 7
S. caprae (n = 9) 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
S. haemolyticus (n = 7) 6 5 2 6 6 2 5
S. lugdunensis (n = 9) 6 5 4 6 6 2 5
a

All five phage subpopulations isolated either on strains A, C, E, or G exhibited similar host range.

b

Strain SE-E used for the isolation of subpopulations E1 to E5 belonged to ST2.

c

Strain SE-G used for the isolation of subpopulations G1 to G5 belonged to ST35.

d

All strains susceptible to phages belonged to ST5.

e

Numbers of strains for which phages exhibited an EOP score > 0 are indicated.

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree shows sequence types ST2, ST35, ST7, ST87, ST32, ST23, ST130, ST487, ST88, ST590, ST5, ST384, and ST81 with strain IDs. Legend indicates sequence types and susceptibility to ancestral or trained phages.

Activity of ancestral and trained phages against a large and diverse collection of S. epidermidis isolates. Activity of phages against strains of various sequence types (indicated by the color used on strain names) is shown in columns on the right part of the phylogenetic tree (activity/no activity: full/empty square).

Phage training is associated with the recombination of genomes of ancestral phages

Genomes of trained phage sub-populations were sequenced and compared to those of ancestral phages. Consistently with host range assessment results showing no change in host range for sub-populations A1-5 and C1-5, their genomes were identical to that of V1SA09 (100% coverage and identity). Conversely, coverage and identity between genomes of sub-populations E1-5 or G1-5 and ancestral phages varied from 85% to 94% and from 96.2% and 99.5%, respectively (Table 3). Of note, three and two variants of genomes were, respectively, identified in the two groups of sub-populations E1-5 or G1-5, exhibiting the same host range within each group but different host range in between the two groups. Among subpopulations E1-5, genomes of E1, E3, and E5 were identical but different from genomes of E2 and E4, the latter being different from each other. Among subpopulations G1-5, genomes of G1 and G3 and those of G2, G4, and G5 were identical. These genomes were found to have evolved from those of ancestral phages V1SA09 and V1SA15 with at least 10 to 15 recombination events (Table 3; Table S3; Fig. S2). A single small 150 bp region was predicted to be inherited from V1SA12 in phage subpopulations E1, E3, E4, and E5 with 100% identity inside a larger region inherited from V1SA15. However, the former could also have originated from V1SA15 with an excess accumulation of SNPs in this region. Predicted recombination events occurred mainly in two regions of the genome: the first comprising numerous genes coding for hypothetical proteins and genes involved in DNA replication, and the second comprising structural genes (Fig. S2). Most of these recombination events had no impact on the sequence of genes near the recombination sites which was identical to that of a gene of at least one ancestral phage. Genes with unmodified sequences compared to ancestral genes were unlikely related to the modifications of host range. Thus, we focused our analyses on genes showing mutations compared to the two ancestral phages (7 to 13 genes per trained phage genome). Six to nine of these mutated genes were associated with amino acid changes in the corresponding proteins (Table 4). Genes that were identical for each of the phage subpopulations of group E (same host range), but which were different from the genes of the phage subpopulations of group G (different host range compared to group E)—and vice versa—were of particular interest. Indeed, they indicate convergence and are, therefore, likely related to the extended host range of these trained phage subpopulations. We identified two (Table 4, lines 6 and 7) and four (Table 4, lines 1–3 and 10) genes corresponding to this definition in groups E1-5 and G1-5, respectively. Unfortunately, they mainly corresponded to hypothetical proteins precluding any conclusion as to a causal effect. Finally, two mutated genes were identical in all trained phage subpopulations (Table 4, lines 12–13) and were, thus, likely not related to the different evolved phenotypes of groups E1-5 and G1-5.

TABLE 3.

Analysis of genomes of trained phage subpopulations E1-5 and G1-5 compared to those of ancestral phages

Phage sub-populations Accession number Size (pb) Coverage/identity of ancestral genomes (%) Recombination events (n) Origin of genes in trained phages
V1SA09 (Cov/Id) V1SA12 V1SA15 V1SA09 (%) V1SA15 (%)
E1/E3/E5 OR640346 142.874 88/99.5 85/96.5 94/99.4 11 51.6a 48.3a
E2 OR640347 142.797 90/99.3 87/97.0 92/99.4 12 62.4 37.6
E4 OR640348 143.293 88/98.6 85/96.2 94/99.4 15 52.7a 47.2a
G1/G3 OR640349 140.937 93/99.4 88/97.2 90/98.3 10 69.2 30.8
G2/G4/G5 OR640350 141.497 93/98.8 87/96.2 90/99.4 10 61.3 93.1
a

A 125 bp portion of a gene located in a region likely inherited from V1SA15 was considered to be inherited of a recombination with V1SA12 genome.

TABLE 4.

Genes of trained phages showing nucleotide mutations associated with amino acid changes in the corresponding proteins compared to ancestral phages

Annotation (example phage_gene number) Protein identity between trained and ancestral phages (coveragea)
E1/E3/E5 E2 E4 G1/G2 G2/G4/G5
V1SA9 V1SA15 V1SA9 V1SA15 V1SA9 V1SA15 V1SA9 V1SA15 V1SA9 V1SA15
Region 1
 1 Phage protein (G1_1) / / / / / / 95.2 99.9 95.2 99.9
 2 Phage protein (G1_9) / / / / / / 97.6 98.1 97.6 98.1
 3 Phage protein (G1_15) 98.1 91.2 / / 98.1 91.2 90.6 98.8 90.6 98.8
 4 Phage protein (E2_15) / / 98.9 91.1 / / / / / /
 5 Hypothetical protein (E1_24) 91.5 27.0 (78) / / 91.5 27.0 (78) NH 98.5 NH 98.5
 6 Hypothetical protein (E1_56) NA 97.6 (95) NA 97.6 (95) NA 97.6 (95) NH NH NH NH
 7 Hypothetical protein (E1_61) 93.9 92.7 93.9 92.7 93.9 92.7 / / / /
Region 2
 8 Recombination-related exonuclease (E4_154) / / / / 99.5 99.7 / / / /
 9 Carbohydrate binding domain-containing proteinb (E2_163) / / 99.8 99.2 99.8 99.2 NH NH NH NH
 10 Tail fiber proteinb (G1_158) / / / / / / 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9
 11 Tail fiber proteinb (E1_165) 99.8 98.6 / / / / / / 98.5 99.9
 12 Phage tail sheath (E1_186) 99.5 99.8 99.5 99.8 99.5 99.8 99.5 99.8 99.5 99.8
 13 Phage holing (E1_222) 99.4 98.8 99.4 98.8 99.4 98.8 99.4 98.8 99.4 98.8
a

Coverage of the ancestral protein sequence is indicated if <100%; /: protein sequence identical to one ancestral gene; NH, no hit identified. Genes common within groups of sub-population E1-5 or G1-5 exhibiting the same host range within each grouop but different host range between the two groups are in bold.

b

Annotation was improved by running NCBI blastp.

Host range expansion to ST2 strains is mediated by the improvement of a step of the viral cycle after adsorption to bacteria

Further analyses were focused on the activity of the trained phage E1 on ST2 strains as a representative of the group of subpopulations E1-5 with the same phenotype isolated on strain SE-E. Adsorption of this phage onto bacterial strain SE-E was not modified compared to that of ancestral phage V1SA09 whatever time points (Fig. 2): less than 5% of free phages were detected in the supernatant after 24 min for both phages. Conversely, adsorption of this same trained phage was higher than that of ancestral phage V1SA15 for which a minimum of 10% of free phages was measured after 40 min. In addition, the concentration of free phages rose dramatically after 40 min only for phage E1 indicating that it was the only one able to multiply in this bacterial strain. Interestingly, phage V1SA19, used as representative of Silviavirus phages and negative control of phage activity and training, did not adsorb onto this bacterial strain.

Fig 2.

Graph shows the percentage of free phages over time after exposing strain SE-E to four phages: V1SA09, V1SA15, Trained E1, and V1SA19. Different symbols represent each phage, with data points and error bars at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min.

Adsorption of ancestral and trained phages onto SE-E S. epidermidis ST2 strain. Means ± standard deviations are indicated. Phage V1SA19 was used as a representative of Silviavirus phages and as a comparator for the adsorption of ancestral V1SA09 and V1SA15 phages, and trained E1 Kayvirus phages.

Since the host range expansion of this trained phage subpopulation E1 compared to the ancestral phages was limited to ST2 strains, it was hypothesized that the latter may harbor specific genes related to a phage resistance mechanism limiting the activity of the ancestral phages and overcome by the trained phages. Thus, we searched for specific genes of this ST among the set of S. epidermidis strains tested in the present study using a pangenome approach. Eight candidate genes were identified in 46 of the 47 ST2 strains. Of note, even if the remaining strain, which was resistant to the trained phages, belonged to ST2, it was phylogenetically distant from all other ST2 strains (P2SE157; Fig. 1). These eight genes were clustered in bacterial genomes and were all located in a region of 41 genes or less corresponding to a prophage sequence showing 90%–95% sequence identity with PI-Sepi-HH2 prophage previously reported to be associated with ST2 strains virulence (Fig. S3) (6). They were annotated or predicted as hypothetical proteins, helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulators, phage tail tape measure protein, excisionase, or peptidoglycan recognition family protein (Table S4). Interestingly, one of these proteins was predicted as a “SaV-like” protein based on the analysis of protein domains (using InterPro software), which has been previously described as involved in susceptibility to abortive infection systems halting phage propagation in Lactococcus strains (17).

A genome-wide association study (GWAS with DBGWAS tool) was also conducted to explore the mechanisms associated with the resistance to trained phages (31/47 ST2 strains) (18). With this approach, 293 significant nodes were identified. Most of them (75%) were associated with phage resistance. However, none of them corresponded to sequences of genes previously reported as involved in resistance to phages (PADLOC and DefenseFiner databases [19, 20]). Interestingly, a succession of nodes corresponding to a group of five genes was identified in 30/31 resistant strains and in only 2/16 susceptible ones. The predicted functions of these genes included a recombinase, a S. aureus uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor (SAUGI) family, and three hypothetical proteins. To assess the possible role of this cluster of genes in resistance to trained phages, this group of five genes was cloned into the expression vector pSK265 and we transformed the P2SE87 strain, which was susceptible to the trained phage E1. However, complementation had no impact on phage susceptibility of this strain despite effective plasmid-mediated expression of the SAUGI-coding gene assessed using qRT-PCR (a 107-fold superior to expression by S. epidermidis strain P2SE175 which was resistant to the phage).

DISCUSSION

Phage training by the principles of the Appelmans protocol has been used to extend the host range of phages infecting several bacterial species, including S. aureus (15, 21). In the present study, we evaluated whether this protocol could be applied to extend the host range of anti-S. aureus Kayvirus and Silviavirus phages to S. epidermidis, a major human pathogen for which alternatives to antibiotics are urgently needed, and for which the environmental isolation and characterization of active phages is laborious and time-consuming.

In the conditions used in the present study, only Kayvirus but not Silviavirus phages were successfully trained with the improved activity of the final training mixture against two of the seven selected S. epidermidis strains compared to the ancestral phages. Interestingly, the data presented herein indicate that only ancestral Kayvirus but not Silviavirus phages were able to adsorb to one of these strains, which may explain why Silviavirus could not be adapted to S. epidermidis isolates. In addition, Kayvirus phages are known to exhibit a polyvalent activity targeting several Staphylococcus species, suggesting that their ability to adapt to a different species is superior to that of other S. aureus-specific phages such as Silviavirus (22). Indeed, previous studies have shown that the two different phage genera recognize different bacterial receptors. Kayvirus phages can adsorb to sugar moieties and/or the backbone of wall teichoic acids (WTA), while Silviavirus only adsorb to the latter (2325). WTA composition varies between S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci as the former species produces WTA with on a phospho-ribitol polymer backbone attached to two units of glycerol, whereas the latter produces phospho-glycerol WTA (26, 27). Thus, Kayvirus phages are likely able to adsorb to a pattern of the WTA conserved between Staphylococcus species accounting for their polyvalent activity.

Isolation of phage subpopulations from the final training mixture on four different bacterial strains showed that only those isolated on the strains against which we observed improved activity after training had a wider host range compared to the ancestral phages. Conversely, subpopulations isolated on the strains against which one of the ancestral V1SA09 phage was active turned out to be identical to this phage, suggesting that it remained the major population active against these strains after 30 co-culture passages. Phage subpopulations with extended host range had two types of phenotypes, being active on their isolation strain but also on strains of the same sequence types (ST2 or ST35). Sáez Moreno et al. previously reported the use of phage training to improve the activity of different genera of phages against S. aureus isolates, including isolates which had never been in contact with the phages (21). However, the significance of the host range changes reported by these authors is difficult to interpret as they did not analyze phage activity according to S. aureus sequence types. In addition, we showed that phage adaptation to S. epidermidis was counterbalanced by a minor decrease of activity against other Staphylococcus species. This phage specialization could be expected as it has been reported in previous studies, notably in natural environments where phage adaptation to “sub-optimal” hosts is a driver for phage diversification to survive and maintain viral populations (28). Our study was limited to the training of phages isolated on S. aureus strains and with no or little activity against S. epidermidis with the aim of limiting the number of phage genera in our collection. However, given the important specificity of the trained phages obtained, it would be interesting to compare the efficacy of training specific anti-S. epidermidis phages with our results.

The analysis of trained phage genomes indicated that they were mosaics of their ancestors used in the training mixture. Mosaicism is the main natural evolutionary pathway of phages and includes two types of recombination events, either between large homologous regions whose extremities are specifically recognized by recombinases, or randomly between short sequences (29). Such mosaicism has also been previously reported in studies of in vitro training of phage mixtures (15, 21). Based on the large panel of evolved phages sequenced in the present study, we demonstrate that adapted phages isolated on a given bacterial strain can present the same phenotype while exhibiting a different genomic mosaicism. We compared the genomes of evolved phages to those of ancestral ones to identify genes with evolved sequences compared to both ancestral phages that could be associated with host range expansion. Only two and four mutated genes were common to all phage subpopulations in each group with different phenotypes and would, thus, merit further exploration. Alternatively, the expansion of host range might also be due to the accumulation of multiple interdependent mutations affecting different genes rather than to single events. Most of these viral genes were located far from the structural module involved in bacterial host recognition. This suggests that phage adaptation is likely not related to changes in adsorption to the bacterial surface but to subsequent steps of phage infection. This hypothesis is supported by the data of the adsorption assays showing no increase in adsorption for evolved phages compared to ancestral ones. This is consistent with findings of other studies describing that host range adaptation of Kayvirus phages was associated with mutations in genes in the genome module allowing host machinery to takeover without change in adsorption (21, 30, 31). However, this contrasts with the well-described evolutionary pathways of phage active against Gram negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, which adapt to resistant bacterial strains by recognition of a secondary receptor (32).

Adapted phages selected in the present study had important inter- and intra-sequence type specificity, having activity against strains belonging to only ST2 or ST35. Narrow host spectrum has previously been reported for other types of anti-S. epidermidis phages (10, 12). This could be related to the multiple determinants of phage activity along the viral replication cycle that remain poorly studied in S. epidermidis. We further attempted to characterize bacterial genetic determinants of the activity of trained phages among ST2 strains which is of particular interest due do its high prevalence compared to other sequence types (6, 7, 33). We identified a cluster of genes specific of ST2 strains and indicating the presence of a prophage related to the prophage PI-Sepi-HH2, previously associated with virulence in ST2 strains (6). This prophage may harbor a resistance mechanism overcome by trained phages. Of note, Kuntova et al. also reported that a prophage-encoded protein provided resistance to Kayvirus phages in Staphylococcus aureus causing abortive infection and that the phage could overcome this resistance after adaptive laboratory evolution (30). Further studies, that are beyond the scope of the present work, are required to assess whether one or several of the genes carried by the ST2-specific prophages identified in the present study could impair the replication of Kayvirus phages and whether one or more mutations in trained phages could counteract this resistance mechanism. Of note, some of these eight genes are less likely to be involved in the resistance mechanism such as those encoding the prophage tail-tape measure protein or the excisionase related to the prophage replication. In addition, the data presented herein indicate that only a subset of ST2 strains were susceptible to trained phages. The presence of five genes, identified using a GWAS approach, including one annotated as coding for a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor (SAUGI) was significantly associated with phage resistance. The SAUGI inhibits the elimination of uracils in DNA that result from the spontaneous deamination of cytosine or the incorporation of dUTP by mistake during replication (34). As the replication of viruses can be altered by the incorporation of dUTP, its role in phage resistance has previously been suggested (34). Kayvirus phages are notably likely susceptible to genomic uracilation as they encode dUTPase (35). By preventing the removal of uracil from phage DNA, SAUGI may, thus, act as an anti-phage factor. However, we were not able to demonstrate this as the plasmid-mediated expression of these five genes in a S. epidermidis strain susceptible to trained phages did not impact phage activity. Deletion of this region in a phage-resistant strain could be an alternative to plasmid complementation. However, genetic manipulation of S. epidermidis strains is particularly challenging notably because of the multi-drug resistance of ST2 strains, including macrolides and chloramphenicol, limiting the choice of plasmids that can be used for such experiments.

To conclude, we show that phage training can be used to extend the host range of polyvalent Kayvirus phages within the Staphylococcus genera to the S. epidermidis species. In the context of the rapid development of phage therapy, the adaptation of previously characterized phages may be an attractive alternative to the fastidious repeated isolation of new phages to improve the therapeutic potential of a phage collection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial and phage strains

All bacterial strains used in the present study are listed in Table S2 (n = 138 strains including 73 S. epidermidis strains and 65 strains of other Staphylococcus species). They were obtained from the collections of the French National Reference Center for Staphylococci and the bacteriology department of the Lyon University Hospital (France). They were cultured from frozen stocks onto blood agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) at 37°C. Overnight liquid cultures were then obtained from individual colonies incubated in tryptic soy broth (TSB; bioMérieux) under agitation at 37°C.

Phages included in this study belonged to two different genera, namely Kayvirus (vB_SauM-V1SA09, vB_SauM-V1SA12, and vB_SauM-V1SA15, here designated V1SA09, V1SA12, and V1SA15, respectively, for simplification) or Silviavirus (vB_SauM-V1SA19, vB_SauM-V1SA20, and vB_SauM-V1SA22, designated V1SA19, V1SA20, and V1SA22, respectively) phages, and were respectively isolated for the purpose of this study (Table S1) or previously described by our team (36). They were propagated using low-virulent S. aureus or S. capitis strains and, if possible, which did not contain any prophages in their genome as previously reported (36).

Phage training (Appelmans protocol) and isolation of phage subpopulations from training mixture

The Appelmans protocol was carried out as previously reported by Burrowes et al. (15). Briefly, three phages were combined in a 1:1:1 mixture (1·1010 PFU/mL of each phage). In a 96-well microtiter plate, 90 µL of this mixture (dilution 100) and of serial 10-fold dilutions (10−1 to 10−9) were added in each of the 10 first columns (one dilution/column). The two last columns contained only TSB medium. Then, 10 µL of overnight bacterial liquid culture was added to wells 1–11 of each of the eight lines (one different bacterial strain/line). Wells no. 11 and no. 12 were, thus, used as positive and negative growth controls, respectively. After overnight incubation at 37°C under 180 rpm agitation, wells showing complete or partial lysis compared to the positive control well, as well as the first completely turbid well, were harvested and pooled. This mixture was then filtrated using a 0.22-µm syringe filter to remove living and dead bacteria; this lysate was called the training mixture of passage 1 (P1). It was then used to inoculate a new plate as described above using new overnight cultures of the same bacterial strains to perform passage 2 (P2). These steps were repeated up to passage 30 (P30). All training mixtures were stored at 4°C. Five individual PFUs obtained from P30 mixture in a 10-mL TSB soft agar layer containing 250 µL of one of the four selected bacterial strains were isolated performing five rounds of purification on each bacterial strain. In total, 20 phage subpopulations were isolated using four bacterial strains (SC-Prod-A, SE-C, SE-E, SE-G). They were then propagated using their respective isolation strain in TSB medium with a MOI of 10−2.

Phage host range assessment

Phage activity was assessed onto all bacterial strains using the spot test assay and EOP score determination as previously described (36). A bacterial strain was considered susceptible to the phage if individual PFUs could be observed at any dilution (EOP > 0). In addition, for the selection of ST2 S. epidermidis strains, we further characterized phage activity in a liquid kinetic assay measuring bacterial growth inhibition using spectrometry (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]) in the presence of phages at MOI = 1 compared to untreated bacteria and calculation of the LAS score (37). Assays were performed with three biological replicates.

Adsorption assays

The adsorption assays were performed as previously described (12). Briefly, selected S. epidermidis strains were grown in 10 mL TSB at 37°C under agitation (180 rpm) to reach an OD600 of 0.4 corresponding to a bacterial concentration of approximately 108 CFU/mL. Phages were then added at a MOI of 10−2 (106 PFU/mL) and incubated at 37°C. Aliquots of 300 µL were taken every 8 min for 60 min and 0.22 µm was filtered to collect non-adsorbed phages. Serial dilutions were performed and spotted onto a soft agar containing the production strain to determine the titer of non-adsorbed phage particles. Assays were formed with three biological replicates and three replicates of phage titration. Percentages of free phages were compared using the Mann-Whitney test considering a P-value ≤ 0.05 as significant.

Bacterial genome sequencing and analysis

Whole genome sequencing was performed using Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) short-read technology (Nextera XT or DNA prep kit for library preparations and NextSeq sequencer) with a read length of 2 × 150 bp. Genomes were assembled using SPAdes. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org). Additionally, one of the ST2 strains (P2SE160) was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore (Oxford, UK) long-read technology. Hybrid-like assemblies of other ST2 genomes were produced by mapping contigs assembled from Illumina sequencing against P2SE160 genome (ragtag scaffold v2.1.0 [38]). Bacterial genomes were annotated using Bakta v1.7.0 (39). A GWAS was performed to compare phage-susceptible and-resistant ST2 strains using DBGAS v0.5.4 (18). We analyzed whether significant nodes identified corresponded to sequences of genes annotated by the two anti-phage systems databases DefenseFinder and PADLOC (19, 20) or prophage sequences detected by PHASTER (40). After pan-genome analysis using Roary (41), ST2-specific genes were identified. InterPro and HHpred tools were used to assign their function and identify protein domains in addition to gene annotation (42, 43). Core genome genes obtained with Roary were used to construct a phylogenetic tree with FastTree v2.1.11 (44).

Bacterial complementation

The plasmid pSK265, a derivative of pC194, was used to express the five genes identified by the GWAS under the control of the rpoB promoter (45). Gibson assembly (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used for the construction of the plasmid with the following primers: psk265_F: GACACTACA CCACCACTAAGATCCTAAAC; psk265_R: GATTGATCATCCCATCTCACCCC; insert_F: GTGAGATGGGATGATCAATCAACATGAAGCG, insert_R: AGTGGTGGTGTAGTGTCATGGTTCATAGA. The Gibson assembly product was first electroporated into S. aureus RN4220 strain using 2 µL of the Gibson assembly product and electroporation conditions previously described (46). Electroporated cells were grown onto TSA plates supplemented with chloramphenicol at 20 µg/mL. The presence of plasmids with the correct insert in the resulting recombinant colonies was confirmed by PCR with primers overlapping the insert and the plasmid: control_plasmid: ATAAGAGCAGGGAAAGAAACCGT; control_insert: TTCCTCATTGAGTCCTTTTC GTCTT. The plasmid was then amplified and extracted from a single colony (Plasmidi Midiprep kit; ZymoResearch, Irvine, CA, USA) to allow the transformation of 1 µg into S. epidermidis P2SE87 strain. The plasmid sequence was verified by Illumina sequencing. The expression of the SAUGI-coding gene on the plasmid insert and of the gyrB housekeeping gene was assessed after RNA extraction (RNeasy Plus Mini kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) from overnight cultures in triplicates followed by reverse transcription (Reverse Transcription System; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and qPCR (TB green assay, Takara, Kyoto, Japan and QuantStudio thermocycler, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following primers: SAUGI_F: AATGTGAAGCACTTGAGGAAGCAGC; SAUGI_ R: TCTGTGAGGT ATAGAAAGTCCATATCAAAATGATC; gyrB_F: CGGTTCGTAAAAGACCGGGTA; gyrB_R: CAGGGCGTCCCATC TTTTCT. Fold change expression was assessed with the 2–∆∆Ct method.

Phage genome sequencing and analysis

Phage DNA extraction, sequencing, and assembly were performed as previously described (36). Genomes were first annotated using BV-BRC v3.30.5i with parameters for phage annotation (47). Other databases were successively used for genes annotated as “hypothetical protein” or “phage protein,” in order of use: PhaLP, pVOGs, PHROG, and Phantome databases. Prediction of protein domain by InterPro was also performed to improve the prediction of function of hypothetical proteins of interest. Genomes were deposited in Genbank under the accession numbers indicated in Table S1; Table 3. Because of the important homology between ancestral phages and the necessity of performing multiple pairwise comparisons, alignments of whole-genome sequences inaccurately reflected the recombination events. To overcome this problem, to compare trained phages with ancestral phages, each gene of trained phages was blasted against ancestral genes to compare sequence coverage and identity to infer their origin. In cases where a gene in a trained phage had 100% identity with only one ancestral phage, the gene was considered to have been inherited from the latter. In cases where a gene from a trained phage had 100% identity with two ancestral phages, the origin of the surrounding genes was considered (Table S3). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were identified using Snippy v4.6.0 after mapping of trained phage reads against ancestral phage-assembled genomes to confirm mutations found with the blast approach.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge Leslie Blazere and Emilie Helluin for their technical support. The authors would like to thank the technicians, engineers, and biologists of the French National Reference Centre for Staphylococci for their help. Sequencing of phage genomes was performed with the GenePII platform of Hospices Civils de Lyon. The authors also acknowledge the scientific review service of Hospices Civils de Lyon for the English writing proofreading.

This study was supported by the French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (PHAG-ONE project, ANR 20-PAMR-0009) and the Fondation Hospices Civils de Lyon.

Contributor Information

Camille Kolenda, Email: camille.kolenda@chu-lyon.fr.

Michela Gambino, Kobenhavns Universitet, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Accession numbers for sequencing data are indicated in Table S2 (project accession numbers PRJEB69270 and PRJEB72624).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00850-24.

Supplemental Figures. msystems.00850-24-s0001.docx.

Figures S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.00850-24-s0002.docx.

Phage collection.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.00850-24-s0003.xlsx.

Bacterial strain collection.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF3
Table S3. msystems.00850-24-s0004.xlsx.

Prediction of recombination events between phage genomes.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF4
Table S4. msystems.00850-24-s0005.docx.

Genes specifically identified in ST2 strains.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF6

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. GBD 2019, Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators . 2022. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Lond Engl 400:2221–2248. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02185-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Flurin L, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Patel R. 2019. Microbiology of polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 94:255–259. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 39:309–317. doi: 10.1086/421946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Siciliano V, Passerotto RA, Chiuchiarelli M, Leanza GM, Ojetti V. 2023. Difficult-to-treat pathogens: a review on the management of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Life (Basel) 13:1126. doi: 10.3390/life13051126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sabaté Brescó M, Harris LG, Thompson K, Stanic B, Morgenstern M, O’Mahony L, Richards RG, Moriarty TF. 2017. Pathogenic mechanisms and host interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis device-related infection. Front Microbiol 8:1401. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Both A, Huang J, Qi M, Lausmann C, Weißelberg S, Büttner H, Lezius S, Failla AV, Christner M, Stegger M, Gehrke T, Baig S, Citak M, Alawi M, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. 2021. Distinct clonal lineages and within-host diversification shape invasive Staphylococcus epidermidis populations. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009304. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lee JYH, Monk IR, Gonçalves da Silva A, Seemann T, Chua KYL, Kearns A, Hill R, Woodford N, Bartels MD, Strommenger B, Laurent F, Dodémont M, Deplano A, Patel R, Larsen AR, Korman TM, Stinear TP, Howden BP. 2018. Global spread of three multidrug-resistant lineages of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Nat Microbiol 3:1175–1185. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0230-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Diallo K, Dublanchet A. 2022. Benefits of combined phage–antibiotic therapy for the control of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a literature review. Antibiotics (Basel) 11:839. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gutiérrez D, Vandenheuvel D, Martínez B, Rodríguez A, Lavigne R, García P, Wommack KE. 2015. Two phages, phiIPLA-RODI and phiIPLA-C1C, lyse mono- and dual-species staphylococcal biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3336–3348. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03560-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Valente LG, Pitton M, Fürholz M, Oberhaensli S, Bruggmann R, Leib SL, Jakob SM, Resch G, Que Y-A, Cameron DR. 2021. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages from the human skin microbiome that infect Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Microbes 2:xtab003. doi: 10.1093/femsmc/xtab003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Göller PC, Elsener T, Lorgé D, Radulovic N, Bernardi V, Naumann A, Amri N, Khatchatourova E, Coutinho FH, Loessner MJ, Gómez-Sanz E. 2021. Multi-species host range of staphylococcal phages isolated from wastewater. Nat Commun 12:6965. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27037-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fanaei Pirlar R, Wagemans J, Ponce Benavente L, Lavigne R, Trampuz A, Gonzalez Moreno M. 2022. Novel bacteriophage specific against Staphylococcus epidermidis and with antibiofilm activity. Viruses 14:1340. doi: 10.3390/v14061340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Melo LDR, Sillankorva S, Ackermann H-W, Kropinski AM, Azeredo J, Cerca N. 2014. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis phage vB_SepS_SEP9 – a unique member of the Siphoviridae family. Res Microbiol 165:679–685. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Suh GA, Lodise TP, Tamma PD, Knisely JM, Alexander J, Aslam S, Barton KD, Bizzell E, Totten KMC, Campbell JL, Chan BK, Cunningham SA, Goodman KE, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Harris AD, Hesse S, Maresso A, Nussenblatt V, Pride D, Rybak MJ, Sund Z, van Duin D, Van Tyne D, Patel R, for the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group . 2022. Considerations for the use of phage therapy in clinical practice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e02071-21. doi: 10.1128/aac.02071-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Burrowes BH, Molineux IJ, Fralick JA. 2019. Directed in vitro evolution of therapeutic bacteriophages: the Appelmans protocol. Viruses 11:241. doi: 10.3390/v11030241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shelburne SA, Dib RW, Endres BT, Reitzel R, Li X, Kalia A, Sahasrabhojane P, Chaftari A-M, Hachem R, Vargas-Cruz NS, Jiang Y, Garey K, Fowler VG, Holland TL, Gu J, Miller W, Sakurai A, Arias CA, Aitken SL, Greenberg DE, Kim J, Flores AR, Raad I. 2020. Whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream isolates from a prospective clinical trial reveals that complicated bacteraemia is caused by a limited number of closely related sequence types. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:646. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Haaber J, Rousseau GM, Hammer K, Moineau S. 2009. Identification and characterization of the phage gene sav, involved in sensitivity to the lactococcal abortive infection mechanism AbiV. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2484–2494. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02093-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jaillard M, Lima L, Tournoud M, Mahé P, van Belkum A, Lacroix V, Jacob L. 2018. A fast and agnostic method for bacterial genome-wide association studies: bridging the gap between k-mers and genetic events. PLoS Genet 14:e1007758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Payne LJ, Meaden S, Mestre MR, Palmer C, Toro N, Fineran PC, Jackson SA. 2022. PADLOC: a web server for the identification of antiviral defence systems in microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W541–W550. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tesson F, Hervé A, Mordret E, Touchon M, d’Humières C, Cury J, Bernheim A. 2022. Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat Commun 13:2561. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sáez Moreno D, Visram Z, Mutti M, Restrepo-Córdoba M, Hartmann S, Kremers AI, Tišáková L, Schertler S, Wittmann J, Kalali B, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Resch G, Corsini L. 2021. ε2-phages are naturally bred and have a vastly improved host range in Staphylococcus aureus over wild type phages. Pharmaceuticals 14:325. doi: 10.3390/ph14040325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. O’Flaherty S, Coffey A, Edwards R, Meaney W, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. 2004. Genome of staphylococcal phage K: a new lineage of Myoviridae infecting Gram-positive bacteria with a low G+C content. J Bacteriol 186:2862–2871. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2862-2871.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Peng C, Hanawa T, Azam AH, LeBlanc C, Ung P, Matsuda T, Onishi H, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y. 2019. Silviavirus phage ɸMR003 displays a broad host range against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of human origin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:7751–7765. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10039-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Takeuchi I, Osada K, Azam AH, Asakawa H, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y, Pettinari MJ. 2016. The presence of two receptor-binding proteins contributes to the wide host range of staphylococcal Twort-like phages. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5763–5774. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01385-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Azam AH, Hoshiga F, Takeuchi I, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y. 2018. Analysis of phage resistance in Staphylococcus aureus SA003 reveals different binding mechanisms for the closely related Twort-like phages ɸSA012 and ɸSA039. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:8963–8977. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9269-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Xia G, Kohler T, Peschel A. 2010. The wall teichoic acid and lipoteichoic acid polymers of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 300:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Li J, Jabbouri S. 2004. Structural elucidation of the extracellular and cell-wall teichoic acids of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A, a reference biofilm-positive strain. Carbohydr Res 339:1467–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Enav H, Kirzner S, Lindell D, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Béjà O. 2018. Adaptation to sub-optimal hosts is a driver of viral diversification in the ocean. Nat Commun 9:4698. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07164-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Moura de Sousa JA, Pfeifer E, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. 2021. Causes and consequences of bacteriophage diversification via genetic exchanges across lifestyles and bacterial taxa. Mol Biol Evol 38:2497–2512. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kuntová L, Mašlaňová I, Obořilová R, Šimečková H, Finstrlová A, Bárdy P, Šiborová M, Troianovska L, Botka T, Gintar P, Šedo O, Farka Z, Doškař J, Pantůček R. 2023. Staphylococcus aureus prophage-encoded protein causes abortive infection and provides population immunity against Kayviruses. mBio 14:e0249022. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02490-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sergueev KV, Filippov AA, Farlow J, Su W, Kvachadze L, Balarjishvili N, Kutateladze M, Nikolich MP. 2019. Correlation of host range expansion of therapeutic bacteriophage Sb-1 with allele state at a hypervariable repeat locus. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01209-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01209-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Meyer JR, Dobias DT, Weitz JS, Barrick JE, Quick RT, Lenski RE. 2012. Repeatability and contingency in the evolution of a key innovation in phage Lambda. Science 335:428–432. doi: 10.1126/science.1214449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Månsson E, Bech Johannesen T, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Å, Söderquist B, Stegger M. 2021. Comparative genomics of Staphylococcus epidermidis from prosthetic-joint infections and nares highlights genetic traits associated with antimicrobial resistance, not virulence. Microb Genomics 7:000504. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang H-C, Hsu K-C, Yang J-M, Wu M-L, Ko T-P, Lin S-R, Wang A-J. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus protein SAUGI acts as a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor. Nucleic Acids Res 42:1354–1364. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kwan T, Liu J, DuBow M, Gros P, Pelletier J. 2005. The complete genomes and proteomes of 27 Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5174–5179. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501140102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kolenda C, Medina M, Bonhomme M, Laumay F, Roussel-Gaillard T, Martins-Simoes P, Tristan A, Pirot F, Ferry T, Laurent F, PHAGEinLYON Study Group . 2022. Phage therapy against Staphylococcus aureus: selection and optimization of production protocols of novel broad-spectrum Silviavirus phages. Pharmaceutics 14:1885. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Xie Y, Wahab L, Gill JJ. 2018. Development and validation of a microtiter plate-based assay for determination of bacteriophage host range and virulence. Viruses 10:189. doi: 10.3390/v10040189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Alonge M, Soyk S, Ramakrishnan S, Wang X, Goodwin S, Sedlazeck FJ, Lippman ZB, Schatz MC. 2019. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol 20:224. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1829-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Paysan-Lafosse T, Blum M, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Pinto BL, Salazar GA, Bileschi ML, Bork P, Bridge A, Colwell L, et al. 2023. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D418–D427. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2009. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Jones CL, Khan SA. 1986. Nucleotide sequence of the enterotoxin B gene from Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 166:29–33. doi: 10.1128/jb.166.1.29-33.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Monk IR, Shah IM, Xu M, Tan M-W, Foster TJ. 2012. Transforming the untransformable: application of direct transformation to manipulate genetically Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. mBio 3:e00277-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00277-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figures. msystems.00850-24-s0001.docx.

Figures S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.00850-24-s0002.docx.

Phage collection.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.00850-24-s0003.xlsx.

Bacterial strain collection.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF3
Table S3. msystems.00850-24-s0004.xlsx.

Prediction of recombination events between phage genomes.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF4
Table S4. msystems.00850-24-s0005.docx.

Genes specifically identified in ST2 strains.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (266.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00850-24.SuF6

Data Availability Statement

Accession numbers for sequencing data are indicated in Table S2 (project accession numbers PRJEB69270 and PRJEB72624).


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES