Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2024 Jul 15;96(5):1020–1025. doi: 10.1002/ana.27033

Cancer frequency in MuSK myasthenia gravis and histological evidence of paraneoplastic etiology

Silvia Falso 1, Marco Gessi 2, Sofia Marini 1, Roberta Benvenuto 2, Eleonora Sabatelli 3, Antonio D’Amati 4, Martina Marini 1, Amelia Evoli 1,3, Raffaele Iorio 1,3
PMCID: PMC11496004  NIHMSID: NIHMS2007522  PMID: 39007444

Abstract

Cancer frequency in MuSK myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) has not yet been explored and the mechanisms leading to the formation of MuSK IgG4 remain elusive. We aimed to explore cancer frequency in MuSK-MG patients and to assess MuSK expression in cancer cells from two tumors occurred in this cohort. Immunohistochemistry on tumor specimens revealed the expression of MuSK in the cancer cells from primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma and endometrial carcinoma. Twenty-one males and 73 females were enrolled. Fifteen cancers occurred in 13/94 patients (13.8%). Patients with cancer were significantly older at time of MuSK-MG onset.

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle fatigability, caused by impaired synaptic transmission at neuromuscular junction. Around 5–7% of MG patients have autoantibodies (Abs) targeting the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), with different pathogenesis and clinical features.1

MuSK-Abs belong to IgG4 subclass that fail to engage complement and are functionally monovalent. Despite ongoing research, pathogenic mechanisms leading to autoimmunization against MuSK remain elusive.

IgG4 Abs typically emerge in response to sustained antigenic stimulation. Tumor lesions frequently display characteristics analogous to those seen in chronic inflammatory responses. IgG4 responses have been reported in different cancers such as melanoma,2 lymphoma,3 and glioblastoma.4

The relationship between neurological autoimmunity and cancer is bidirectional, with autoimmune diseases potentially increasing cancer risk through long-term immunosuppression, and anti-tumor immune responses potentially leading to autoimmunity.

Assessing cancer frequency among MG patients is particularly relevant given the emergence of novel molecular therapies avoiding immune system suppression.5

Cancer prevalence among MuSK-MG patients remains unclear, and there are no documented cases of MuSK-MG as paraneoplastic syndrome. This study aimed to explore frequency and timing of cancer in this population.

METHODS

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and was conducted in conformation with Helsinki Declaration. It was approved by Ethics Committee of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (protocol #23752/14). Participants gave informed consent to participate before taking part.

Study Subjects

In this retrospective study, we reviewed records of patients diagnosed with MuSK-MG between 2005 and 2022 at Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli (Rome, Italy). Patients with at least one-year follow-up were included. We recorded associated cancers, timing of oncological diagnosis in relation to MuSK-MG onset, type and duration of immunosuppressive therapy. We performed immunohistochemistry to assess MuSK expression in cancer cells of tumor specimens from two patients with MuSK-MG onset after cancer diagnosis.

Immunohistochemistry of tumor specimens

Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections (3 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with polyclonal rabbit IgG specific to the extracellular MuSK domain (PA1–1741, Invitrogen). To expose target proteins, heat induced antigen retrieval was performed using 10mM sodium citrate (pH 6.0) buffer for 30 minutes using a microwave. Following antigen retrieval, tissues were blocked in 3% BSA-PBS for 5 minutes and then probed with or without (negative control) a MuSK polyclonal antibody at dilution of 1:20 for 30 minutes at room temperature. Tissues were washed extensively with Wash Solution Buffer 1X and endogenous peroxidase activity quenched with Peroxidase Suppressor for 30 minutes at room temperature. Detection was performed using a goat anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibody (1:200) followed by colorimetric detection using metal enhancer DAB. Tissues were counterstained with hematoxylin and prepped for mounting.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize all variables. Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute counts and percentages, quantitative variables were presented using median and interquartile range. Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to assess distribution of the data. Fisher’s exact test was utilized for comparing qualitative variables. Mann-Whitney test was performed for analyzing quantitative differences. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with presence of neoplasm. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.1.0 and JMP 18.

RESULTS

Case 1

A 42-year-old man was diagnosed with primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were performed followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and mediastinal radiotherapy, according to current guidelines.6 This treatment achieved PMBCL remission. Three years later, he developed fluctuating diplopia, which was subsequently associated with dysarthria, dysphagia, facial weakness and limb fatigability. Anti-MuSK Abs resulted positive by RIA (1.14 nMol/L; normal value < 0.05) and pathologic decrement (−27%) of compound muscle action potential on repetitive nerve stimulation with 3 Hz was detected. MuSK-MG was diagnosed and prednisone was started at 0.5 mg/kg daily, leading to clinical improvement. At last follow-up, minimal manifestation status (MMs) was achieved according to MGFA post-intervention status.7

Case 2

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with an endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC). She underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by chemotherapy achieving cancer remission. Three years later, she presented with fluctuating diplopia and ptosis; after six months, she was admitted to our emergency room due to dysarthria, dyspnea and muscle fatigability. She developed acute respiratory failure requiring orotracheal intubation followed by tracheostomy. MG was suspected based on clinical grounds and MuSK-Abs were detected by RIA (2.40 nMol/L). Prednisone was started at 0.5 mg/kg daily and she underwent plasma-exchange with partial improvement, achieving discharge from intensive care unit. Subsequently, rituximab was administered (1000 mg intravenously 2 weeks apart) leading to progressive clinical improvement and the tracheostomy was successfully closed. At the last follow-up, six months after discharge, the patient had reached MMs.

MuSK expression in tumor specimens

Tissue specimens from these two patients were available and examined for MuSK expression. Immunohistochemistry detected MuSK expression in cancer cells from both the PMBCL and the ECCC. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tissue specimens (two PMBCLs and two ECCCs) from patients without MuSK-MG, available at our Pathology Unit. MuSK expression was detected in both the PMBCLs and in one out of two ECCCs. In all the positive cases there was a pronounced MuSK-specific nuclear reactivity, suggesting the nuclear translocation of MuSK in cancer cells. Notably, MuSK expression was not detected in normal endometrial tissue. (Fig.2)

Figure 2. Expression of MuSK by patients’ tumors.

Figure 2.

Immunohistochemical analysis shows high level of MuSK expression in cancer cells of primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and in muscle cells (A). Higher magnification shows mild MuSK expression in the cytoplasm and high expression in the nuclei of lymphoma cells (white arrows) but not in normal infiltrating lymphocytes (B). High level of MuSK expression is detected in the nuclei of tumor cells from endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) of a patient with MuSK-MG (C). Immunohistochemistry reveals high level of MuSK expression in the nuclei of cancer cells from PMBCLs of two patients without MuSK-MG (D-F). High level of expression of MuSK is detected in the nuclei of tumor cells from ECCC of a patient without MuSK-MG (G). Immunohistochemical analysis did not show MuSK expression in ECCC of another patient without MuSK-MG (H). MuSK expression was not detected in normal endometrial tissue (I). Tissues immunostained with the indicated avidin-biotin peroxidase method, and mildly counterstained with hematoxylin. All panels x400.

Cancer frequency and oncological associations in MuSK-MG

We included 94 MuSK-MG patients, 73 (78%) females, with a median age at MG onset of 51 years [19–75]. Ninety-two out of ninety-four (97.9%) cases required corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants (IS). Detailed characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Number and type of tumors and immunosuppressive therapy in MuSK-MG patients with and without cancer.

Variable Cancer Patients (N) % No cancer Patients (N) % p-value
Total 13 13.8% 81 86.2%
Median age at MG onset (range) 59 (22–76) 41 (19–75) 0.036 *
Median age at cancer diagnosis (range) 64 (18–79) / /
Cancer (N=15) Cancer/patient
1 11 84.6% / /
2 2 15.4% / /
Type (N=15)
Hematological malignancies 5 33.3% / /
Breast 3 20.0% / /
Uterus 2 13.3% / /
Digestive organs 2 13.3% / /
Lung (neuroendocrine) 1 6.6% / /
Vocal cords 1 6.6% / /
Skin (squamous cell) 1 6.6% / /
Gender NS
Men 3 23.1% 18 22.2%
Women 10 76.9% 63 77.8%
IST 6/13 85.7% 80/81 98.8%
None 7 14.3% 1 1.2%
Only CS 3 42.8% 27 33.3%
CS + 1 IS 1 14.3% 25 30.9%
CS + 2 IS 1 14.3% 13 16%
Rituximab 1 14.3% 15 18.5%
MGFA-PIS
MMs-or-better 9 69.2% 44 54.3% NS
*

The median age of MG onset was significantly higher in cancer group.

Abbreviations. CS: corticosteroids; IS: immunosuppressant; IST: immunosuppressive therapy; MG: myasthenia gravis; MMs: minimal manifestation status; PIS: post-intervention status.

Fifteen cancers occurred in 13/94 patients (13.8%). Median age at cancer onset was 64 years [18–79]. In terms of temporal relationship with MuSK-MG onset, cancer preceded MG diagnosis in five patients (median: 11 years, [3–17]), occurred concurrently in two, and followed MG diagnosis in eight (median: 11.5 years, [1–32]) (Fig.1). Six patients were on long-term immunosuppression at cancer diagnosis (corticosteroids with: azathioprine 1/6; mycophenolate mofetil 1/6; rituximab 1/6). Hematologic malignancies were the most frequent cancers (N=5), all occurred before MG onset, in detail: two mediastinal Hodgkin’s lymphomas and one of each: PMBCL, orbital lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndrome evolved to leukemia. Other cancer types are reported in Table 1.

Figure 1. Interval (years) between MG onset and cancer diagnosis in patients 1–13.

Figure 1.

Cancer preceded MG diagnosis in five patients, occurred concurrently in two patients, and followed MG diagnosis in eight patients. Patient 1 and 3 had two cancers.

According to median age at MuSK-MG onset, we divided patients in two categories (below and above 51 years) for multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gender, age at MuSK-MG onset, outcome (MMs-or-better) and severity of MuSK-MG were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. IST was not included since few patients were untreated in our cohort. Age at MuSK-MG onset [odds rate (OR) = 3.584, 95% CI: 1.087 to 12.906, p = 0.036] was independently associated with cancer presence.

DISCUSSION

We detected MuSK expression in tumor specimens of a PMBCL and ECCC, obtained from two patients who developed MuSK-MG after cancer diagnosis. The patient with PMBCL was treated with rituximab at the time of cancer diagnosis, which probably delayed the onset of MG symptoms. Interestingly, MuSK expression was detected also in cancer cells of two PMBCLs and one out of two ECCCs from patients without MuSK-MG. Notably, normal endometrial tissue did not show MuSK expression.

Immunohistochemistry revealed strong nuclear expression of the MuSK protein in cancer cells of these tumors. MuSK is a receptor tyrosine-kinase (RTK) normally expressed on plasma membrane. Our data show nuclear translocation of the whole MuSK protein, or at least its extracellular region, and are in line with previous evidence on RTKs translocation in cancer cells in response to environmental stimuli.8

These findings, previously unexplored for MuSK, might indicate a novel pathway in tumorigenesis and a potential therapeutic target similar to other RTKs. RTKs are membrane receptors with high affinity for extracellular growth factors, cytokines, and hormones. Overexpression and mutation of RTKs as well as dysregulation of their signaling may lead to human diseases, including cancer.9

The demonstration of MuSK nuclear immunoreactivity in patients’ tumors supports a possible paraneoplastic etiology for some MuSK-MG cases. MuSK expression in cancer cells may initiate MuSK autoantibody production as it has been demonstrated for classical paraneoplastic syndromes.10,11 Likewise, CDR2 and CDR2L are expressed in ovarian cancers from patients with and without Yo Abs12 as well as HuD protein is expressed in 100% of small cell lung carcinoma of patients with and without paraneoplastic syndrome.13,14 In our cohort, the cancer rate was 14%, suggesting a low cancer association, limited by the small number of patients.15 The most frequent link was with onco-hematological malignancies (5/15, 33.3%); of these, three (60%) were mediastinal lymphomas. The association with PMBCL may support the administration of B-cell-depleting agents that could be effective both for MuSK-MG and PMBCL.

MuSK-MG generally shows a striking prevalence in women with a peak in the late 30s.1 Multivariate logistic regression analysis predicted a higher likelihood of underlying cancer in patients with MG onset above 51 years. This finding may suggest the need for a tailored cancer screening protocol in this MuSK-MG population.

The mechanisms underlying MuSK’s nuclear translocation in cancer cells and its potential role in tumorigenesis are unclear. Further studies are needed to explore a possible paraneoplastic origin of MuSK-MG.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the MGNet a member of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) NIH U54 NS115054.

Footnotes

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Data Availability

Data are available upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Evoli A, Alboini PE, Damato V, et al. Myasthenia gravis with antibodies to MuSK: an update. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Jan 2018;1412(1):82–89. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Karagiannis P, Gilbert AE, Josephs DH, et al. IgG4 subclass antibodies impair antitumor immunity in melanoma. J Clin Invest. Apr 2013;123(4):1457–74. doi: 10.1172/JCI65579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takahashi N, Ghazale AH, Smyrk TC, Mandrekar JN, Chari ST. Possible Association Between IgG4-Associated Systemic Disease With or Without Autoimmune Pancreatitis and non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Pancreas. 2009;38(5):523–526. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31819d73ca [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harshyne LA, Nasca BJ, Kenyon LC, Andrews DW, Hooper DC. Serum exosomes and cytokines promote a T-helper cell type 2 environment in the peripheral blood of glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol. Feb 2016;18(2):206–15. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iorio R Myasthenia gravis: the changing treatment landscape in the era of molecular therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. Jan 8 2024;doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00916-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fakhri B, Ai W. Current and emerging treatment options in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol. 2021;12:20406207211048959. Published 2021 Oct 8. doi: 10.1177/20406207211048959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.America TF of the MSAB of the MGF of, Jaretzki AIII, Barohn RJ, et al. Myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2000;55(1):16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.1.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carpenter G, Liao HJ. Receptor tyrosine kinases in the nucleus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Oct 1 2013;5(10):a008979. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schlessinger J Receptor tyrosine kinases: legacy of the first two decades. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Mar 1 2014;6(3)doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iorio R, Spagni G, Masi G. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Semin Diagn Pathol. Jul 2019;36(4):279–292. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2019.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilligan M, McGuigan C, McKeon A. Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. Mar 2023;23(3):67–82. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01250-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raspotnig M, Haugen M, Thorsteinsdottir M, et al. Cerebellar degeneration-related proteins 2 and 2-like are present in ovarian cancer in patients with and without Yo antibodies. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2017;66(11):1463–1471. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2041-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manley GT, Smitt PS, Dalmau J, Posner JB. Hu antigens: Reactivity with hu antibodies, tumor expression, and major immunogenic sites. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(1):102–110. doi: 10.1002/ana.410380117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ehrlich D, Wang B, Lu W, Dowling P, Yuan R. Intratumoral anti-HuD immunotoxin therapy for small cell lung cancer and neuroblastoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7(1). doi: 10.1186/s13045-014-0091-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Graus F, Vogrig A, Muñiz-Castrillo S, et al. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(4):e1014. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES