Abstract
Diquat (DQ) is a nonselective bipyridine herbicide with a structure resembling paraquat (PQ). In recent years, the utilization of DQ as a substitute for PQ has grown, leading to an increase in DQ poisoning cases. While the toxicity mechanism of DQ remains unclear, it is primarily attributed to the intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) through the process of reduction oxidation. This results in oxidative stress, leading to a cascade of clinical symptoms. Notably, recent reports on DQ poisoning have highlighted a concerning trend: an upsurge in cases involving neurological damage caused by DQ poisoning. These patients often present with severe illness and a high mortality rate, with no effective treatment available thus far. Imaging findings from these cases have shown that neurological damage tends to concentrate on the brainstem. However, the specific mechanisms behind this poisoning remain unclear, and no specific antidote exists. This review summarizes the research progress on DQ poisoning and explores potential mechanisms. By shedding light on the nerve damage associated with DQ poisoning, we hope to raise awareness, propose new avenues for investigating the mechanisms of DQ poisoning, and lay the groundwork for the development of treatment strategies for DQ poisoning. Trial registration number: 2024PS174K.
Keywords: Diquat, Poisoning, Nervous system, Mechanisms of intoxication, Oxidative stress
Introduction
Diquat (DQ) belongs to the class of nonselective bipyridine herbicides, sharing a structural similarity with paraquat (PQ). It ranks as the third-largest herbicide globally, following PQ and glyphosate usage. In 1955, DQ was initially synthesized by the British company ICI, which later recognized its value as a desiccant and herbicide, leading to its market introduction in 1958 [1]. While DQ’s usage is not as widespread as PQ, the absence of specific antidotes for PQ poisoning and its high mortality rate have prompted many countries worldwide to ban the sale and use of PQ. Consequently, DQ has seen increased utilization as a substitute for PQ in recent years, accompanied by a rise in DQ poisoning cases. A study conducted from 2004 to 2007, focusing on accidental pesticide exposure in children in the USA, identified DQ as one of the most common accidental pesticide exposures among children [2].
DQ poisoning can inflict damage on multiple tissues and organs, with the digestive tract and kidneys being the most frequently affected, followed by the liver, lungs, and heart. It is crucial to note that DQ also exerts toxic effects on the central nervous system, leading to clinical symptoms such as dizziness, drowsiness, convulsions, coma, irritability, and disorientation [3]. When a patient presents with neurological symptoms, DQ often predicts the disease’s severity and a poor prognosis. Currently, most research on DQ poisoning centers on the primary target organs like the kidneys, liver, and digestive tract, with relatively fewer studies on central nervous system injury. The mechanism underlying nerve injury remains unclear, and effective treatments for DQ-induced neurological injury are lacking. This review consolidates research progress on DQ, encompassing its physicochemical properties, poisoning methods, neurological damage, imaging manifestations, and potential mechanisms. Our aim is to propose fresh insights into the mechanism of DQ poisoning and provide a theoretical foundation for developing treatment strategies for nervous system injuries arising from DQ poisoning.
Physicochemical Properties of DQ
DQ is an odorless yellow crystal, also known as 1,1′-ethylene-2,2-bipyridylium dibromide. It has a relative molecular weight of 344.05 and is insoluble in nonpolar organic solvents. It is slightly soluble in methanol and easily soluble in water at room temperature. Typically, it is prepared as a dark brown transparent liquid with an earthy odor [3]. DQ is relatively stable in neutral and acidic solutions but becomes unstable when exposed to light in alkaline solutions. It is prone to hydrolysis, with the rate of hydrolysis increasing with higher temperatures. You can find specific physical and chemical properties of DQ in Table 1. DQ is known for its effective weed control properties. When absorbed by green plant tissues, it generates peroxide free radicals, leading to damage and rapid cell death in plant membranes. As a result, DQ is widely used for weed control purposes.
Table 1.
Poisoning Method of DQ
DQ can be absorbed by the gastrointestinal, respiratory, eye, or mucocutaneous routes. It has also been reported in the literature to be absorbed by subcutaneous, intramuscular, and vaginal injections, although these occurrences are rare [4, 5]. DQ is less absorbed through the skin and lungs. The skin effectively prevents DQ absorption, but DQ absorption increases when the skin is damaged [6]. Gastrointestinal ingestion is the most common and most damaging route of acute DQ poisoning. In the gastrointestinal tract, DQ is degraded by intestinal flora, resulting in an absorption rate of less than 10% [7]. After being absorbed into the human body, DQ is rapidly distributed to various organs and tissues through the bloodstream [8]. Among these, the concentrations in the liver and kidney are high, with distribution in the liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, lung, and other tissues peaking at 2 h and then decreasing rapidly [3]. While the absorption rate of DQ is low, it is rapidly and widely distributed. Autopsies of DQ poisoning patients have shown varying concentrations of DQ in tissues (body fluids) of patients who died at different time intervals. For instance, for patients who died at 14 h, the order of concentration from high to low was urine > vitreous humor in the eye > lungs > liver > brain tissue > kidneys [9]. In contrast, for patients who died at 143 h, the concentrations in descending order were liver > skeletal muscle > lung > kidney > brain tissue > heart [10].
DQ remains relatively stable in the human body. A small amount undergoes pyridine epoxidation in the liver through cytochrome P450 enzymes, producing less toxic iodopyridine and dipyridine derivatives, which are further metabolized [11]. Most of the DQ entering the digestive tract is excreted in feces within 24 h (approximately 90–95%), with around 45% excreted in urine within 48 h of absorption. A negligible amount is excreted in bile [3, 11], and only approximately 2% of DQ is absorbed into the blood and distributed to various tissues. Some reports suggest no significant difference in the reduction of urinary PQ and DQ poisoning when comparing the two. Still, the DQ concentration in bile tends to be higher, indicating that bile may reduce DQ concentrations in serum and human tissues after long-term ingestion [12]. DQ can have a positive effect on the reductive-oxidative activity of organisms when ingested rapidly, and in severe cases, it can lead to sudden death.
Neurologic Injury and Imaging Findings of DQ Poisoning
Acute DQ toxicity often results in multiorgan insufficiency. Unlike PQ, DQ causes mild reversible damage to type I lung cells and does not damage type II alveolar cells [13]. Animal experiments have confirmed that the half-life of DQ in the lungs is one-sixth that of PQ [14], making the lungs less susceptible to damage. However, it is important to note that DQ has a toxic effect on central nervous system cells, leading to relatively common and severe central nervous system symptoms [15], which can manifest as recurrent headaches, dizziness, drowsiness, coma, epileptiform seizures, and more, often with a high mortality rate. Animal experiments have shown that oxidative stress in the brain leads to degeneration of dopaminergic cells [16], resulting in over an 80% reduction in dopamine uptake [17]. In an experiment by Wu et al. [18], Wister rats infected with DQ by gavage exhibited symptoms such as listlessness, disheveled fur, reduced mobility, and altered breathing patterns in the early stages of poisoning. Some mice even showed signs of central nervous system damage with uncoordinated limb movements before and after poisoning.
In clinical cases published as early as 1981, Vanholder et al. [15] reported the case of a 64-year-old patient with DQ poisoning who suffered intracerebral hemorrhage and later died in a coma. Autopsy results revealed pontine hemorrhage and brainstem infarction as the causes of death. In 1999, Rudez et al. [4] reported a patient who experienced quadriplegia and dysarthria 3 months after a vaginal injection of 20 mL of DQ. Saeed et al. [19] documented a case of DQ poisoning leading to intracranial hematoma in the right basal ganglia region in 2001. In 2020, Xing et al. [20] reported that a 21-year-old male patient with DQ poisoning developed impaired consciousness and bilateral Babinski signs after 5 days of symptomatic treatment. Head CT scans on day 11 showed acute pontine demyelination. Notably, there were abnormal signals in the pons, as observed in diffusion-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient imaging. The patient’s serum sodium concentration was normal, ruling out sodium-related demyelination. This study emphasized the diagnostic value of neuroimaging for central pontine myelinolysis. Cochinwala et al. [21] reported a case in a 2-year-old boy in 2021, where a previously healthy Hispanic boy mistakenly ingested DQ. On the third hospital day, a CT scan of the brain showed reduced density in the brainstem and central gray matter, diffuse intracerebral edema, interval increase in the size of the lateral and third ventricles, and effacement of the suprasellar and basilar cisterns, indicating uncal, hippocampal, and tonsillar herniation. Wang et al. [22] measured the concentration of DQ in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with DQ poisoning and found that the concentration of DQ in the cerebrospinal fluid decreased significantly faster than in the blood. Importantly, a specific correlation was observed between the concentration of DQ in the cerebrospinal fluid, intracranial pressure, and the severity of cerebral edema in this patient.
Chen [23] reported that imaging of the DQ-poisoned brain revealed symmetrical lesions in the cerebellar dentate nucleus, pontine brain, and deep nuclei in the basal ganglia region, with the pontine and basal ganglia regions being more affected. Particularly, the lesions in the pontine encepontica were characterized by symmetrical lesions in the center of the pons that did not involve the surrounding pons tissue and corticospinal tract. This finding suggests that the pons is a characteristic lesion site in DQ toxic encephalopathy and holds important differential diagnostic significance. In recent years, with the widespread use of DQ in China, Chinese scholars have reported several cases of neurological damage associated with DQ poisoning, as shown in Table 2 [20, 22–25]. In September 2023, the emergency department of Shengjing Hospital, affiliated with China Medical University, where the author works, also admitted a patient with nervous system damage after DQ poisoning. This 51-year-old woman ingested approximately 120 mL of DQ (20 g/100 mL), which was followed by nausea and vomiting. Her heart rate was 107 beats/min on admission, and her blood pressure was 178/105 mmHg. Laboratory test results were as follows: white blood cell (WBC), 12.03 × 109/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), 10 IU/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 12 IU/L; creatinine, 47.6 mol/L; urea, 7.6 mmol/L; potassium, 3.75 mmol/L; sodium, 134 mmol/L; and blood DQ concentration, 3.59 ng/mL. A head computed tomography scan at the time of admission showed patchy hypodense opacities on the left side of the ventricle and on the right side of the brainstem, which were considered to be old lesions in the patient’s brain. On the third day after admission, the patient became unconscious. On the 15th day after admission, head MRI scans showed multiple patchy long T1 and long T2 signal shadows in the right frontal lobe, bilateral paraventricles, bilateral basal ganglia, brainstem, and right cerebellum, with most of the FLAIR images appearing hyperintense. DWI showed that the brainstem lesions were significantly hyperintense, with corresponding ADC showing hypointensity (Fig. 1). After 43 days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged with the ability to lift her left limb off the bed but not against resistance.
Table 2.
Case | Sex | Age | DQ concentration | Dose (mL) | Blood DQ concentration(ng/mL) | CT findings | MRI findings | Prognosis | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | 16 | 20% | 120 | 63.7 | Decreased diffuse density in the brain stem | Pons showed long T1 and short T2 signals, DWI and FLAIR showed low signals | Improvement in clinical symptoms | 26 |
2 | M | 20 | 20% | 80–100 | 0.93 | —— | MRI showing T1WI, T2WI, T2-FLAIR, and DWI of the brainstem, particularly in the pons, following central pontine myelinolysis signal intensity | After 3 months, he continued to experience dystaxia and difficulty in walking | 27 |
3 | M | 20 | 20% | 80–100 | —— | A low density in the brainstem region | MRI showed abnormal high intensity in the pons, bilateral brachium pons, and pedunculus cerebri on T1WI, T2WI, and T2-FLAIR, and slight high intensity on DWI | After 18 days, he experienced cardiac arrest and died | 27 |
4 | M | 31 | 20% | 50 | 0.43 | —— | T1WI, T2WI, T2-FLAIR, and DWI depict abnormal medulla oblongata, pons, midbrain, cerebellum, bilateral brachium pons, and pedunculus cerebri | At 57 days, his symptoms were almost completely relieved | 27 |
5 | M | 21 | 20% | 100 | —— | —— | Pontine lesion, which appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery imaging | At 15 days after admission, the patient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | 22 |
6 | F | 55 | 20% | 50 | —— | CT was normal on admission | Pons on T1WI was observed with patchy low-signal shadow in pons. Pons on T2WI showed a flaky and slightly high signal shadow. The T2-FLAIR lesions are significantly hyperactive | Clinical symptoms and imaging findings improved | 25 |
7 | F | 32 | 20% | 100 | —— | Decreased pons density | DWI showed a marked pattern of high signal shadow in the pons with limited diffusion | Clinical symptoms and imaging findings improved | 25 |
8 | M | 51 | 20% | 120 | 3.59 | Left ventricle and right brainstem softened lesion | Patchy long T1 and long T2 signal shadows were observed in the right frontal lobe, bilateral lateral ventricle, bilateral basal ganglia, brainstem, and right cerebellum. FLAIR showed mostly high signals. The brain stem lesions on DWI showed high signal, and the ADC showed low-signal shadow | After 43 days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged with the left limb able to lift off the bed surface but not against resistance | |
9 | F | 54 | —— | —— | 187.25 | A hypodensity in the pons | —— | After 26 days of therapy, the patient was discharged stable | 24 |
Mechanisms of DQ Nervous System Damage
In the past, most studies on DQ poisoning primarily focused on damage to organs such as the kidneys, liver, and lungs. However, in recent years, there has been a growing number of reports highlighting neurological damage resulting from DQ poisoning. This emerging issue has garnered increased attention within the scientific community. Although the precise mechanisms of DQ toxicity remain incompletely understood, its impact on the nervous system is multifaceted. Existing research indicates that DQ can generate numerous redox products through redox processes, exerting a potent toxic effect on central nervous cells and as a crucial factor contributing to nervous system damage.
Oxidative Stress Induced by DQ
DQ, a nonselective bipyridine herbicide, exerts its detrimental effects on various tissues and organs primarily through the generation of copious amounts of ROS and RNS via redox reactions within cells, resulting in oxidative stress [26]. This oxidative stress subsequently leads to cellular dysfunction [27]. Due to DQ’s high redox potential, it possesses an enhanced capacity to induce oxidative damage [28].
Upon entering the body, DQ undergoes reduction facilitated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR). This reduction process, accompanied by electron transfer from NADPH, gives rise to NADP + and an exceedingly unstable DQ radical (DQ + ·). DQ + ·, in turn, donates electrons to molecular oxygen (O2), resulting in the formation of the superoxide radical (O2· −) and the restoration of DQ + · to its original state. The significant production of O2· − within this cycle prompts the generation of ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), either spontaneously or through superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalysis. Normally, H2O2 is converted into water via catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX). However, when ROS levels exceed the body’s regulatory capacity, cellular protective mechanisms, encompassing nonenzymatic elements like glutathione (GSH), thioredoxin, selenium, and vitamins C and E, as well as antioxidant enzymes including SOD, GPX, GR, and CAT, become overwhelmed, resulting in oxidative stress [3, 17, 29, 30].
Notably, DQ + · and O2· − can liberate iron from ferritin by reducing iron ions (Fe3 +) into ferrous ions (Fe2 +). These Fe2 + ions serve as catalysts in the Fenton reaction and the Haber–Weiss reaction, facilitating the conversion of H2O2 into the more potent hydroxyl radical (OH·), which wreaks havoc on biomolecules [31] (see Fig. 2). The accumulation of ROS within cells leads to DNA damage, while an abundance of hydroxyl radicals targets cellular lipid membranes, protein structures, and other macromolecules, resulting in structural damage to cell membranes and overall cellular harm. Additionally, the substantial consumption of CPR and NADPH leads to impairment of the cellular respiratory chain [32].
Moreover, DQ induces hypoxia within the body, leading to the heightened production of nitric oxide (NO). Under the influence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), ROS and NO interact to generate peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which falls under the category of RNS. Excessive RNS levels can induce nitrosative stress, causing oxidative damage to intracellular lipids, proteins, and DNA [33]. ROS and RNS constitute vital small-molecule mediators within the body, and their excessive production disrupts the body’s antioxidant defense systems, triggering a severe oxidative stress response [34] (see Fig. 2).
Autophagy: Maintaining Cellular Homeostasis
Autophagy is a highly regulated and evolutionarily conserved lysosome-mediated process responsible for protein degradation and organelle recycling [35]. In the central nervous system, autophagy plays a pivotal role in preserving the functional integrity of nerve tissue by acting as a cellular guardian against damage and ensuring cellular homeostasis by removing damaged or redundant organelles.
Within the autophagy pathway, the interplay of PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) and Parkin proteins is crucial in mitochondrial autophagy regulation. Studies have revealed that exposure of PC12 nerve cells to a DQ solution results in the inhibition of mitochondrial complex I activity by DQ, leading to changes in mitochondrial membrane potential [36]. This perturbation inhibits the entry of PINK1 into mitochondria, thereby triggering the accumulation of PINK1, which subsequently activates and recruits the Parkin protein [37]. Activated Parkin proteins facilitate the ubiquitination and degradation of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins [38, 39], ultimately culminating in the autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria.
Furthermore, DQ’s excessive ROS can activate protein kinase C (PKC). Activated PKC phosphorylates protein IκB [40], leading to the dissociation of IκB from nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), thereby activating NF-κB. NF-κB orchestrates the regulation of the pro-apoptotic factor P53, ultimately augmenting P53 expression in PC12 nerve cells and causing its accumulation within the cytoplasm and nucleus [41]. When stress-induced damage becomes irreparable, P53 translocates to the mitochondrial outer membrane, releasing mitochondrial pro-apoptotic genes Bax and Bak. Bax and Bak each contribute to the formation of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTP), culminating in the release of cytochrome C and the exacerbation of mitochondrial dysfunction. Ultimately, this cascade leads to apoptosis in PC12 nerve cells [42] (see Fig. 3).
Additionally, Cartelli et al. observed that the absence of Parkin protein in mouse cells resulted in microtubule over acetylation, inhibiting mitochondrial migration and transport [43]. In mice with Parkin deficiency, alterations in mitochondrial morphology and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels were evident, ultimately leading to degeneration and motor dysfunction of dopamine (DA) neurons [44, 45]. Parkin protein exists in a physiologically inhibited state, with activation occurring upon phosphorylation at the Serine65 (S65) site on its N-terminal ubiquitin-like (Ubl) domain [46]. Activated Parkin protein further facilitates autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria by promoting ubiquitination and degradation of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins [47].
In summary, cellular damage inflicted by DQ may disrupt the delicate equilibrium within the autophagy process, representing a critical balance between cellular protection and the cytotoxic effects of DQ-induced stress and cellular damage. Park et al. reported that DQ activates NF-κB and p53 pathways to contribute to autophagy induction. Moreover, MAPK inhibitors control DQ-induced apoptosis and autophagy through mTOR signaling [48]. Fiesel et al. demonstrated the presence of mitophagy in the brains of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients [49]. Kin et al. reported that DQ, when cytotoxic, induces both chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) and macroautophagy in SH-SY5Y cells. The induction of autophagy modulates cytotoxicity by suppressing apoptosis in DQ-exposed cells. CMA is vital in the degradation of pathological α-synuclein and the reduction of apoptosis in a DQ-induced α-synucleinopathy model [50].
Nerve Cell Degeneration
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by a range of symptoms stemming from a reduction in the production of dopamine transmitters in the substantia nigra region of the midbrain, disrupting the equilibrium among neurons responsible for controlling movement. Key pathological features include Lewy bodies formation and the degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons [51]. In addition to genetic factors, there is mounting evidence suggesting that environmental factors also contribute to the onset and progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Epidemiological and toxicological investigations have pinpointed DQ as a major neurotoxic substance linked to the pathogenesis of PD [52–54]. In cases of acute DQ toxicity, it can exert severe toxic effects on the central nervous system, leading to symptoms resembling PD [55].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that DQ induces mitochondrial dysfunction and triggers an inflammatory cascade involving microglial activation by generating oxidative stress [16, 17, 56, 57]. These processes may be implicated in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra. Lindquist et al. [58] injected 14C-labeled DQ into the abdominal cavity of temporal forest frogs and observed that performing whole-body autoradiography in mice revealed low and relatively uniform levels of radioactivity in brain tissue. Accumulation of DQ in neuromelanin could potentially result in lesions of pigmented nerve cells, contributing to the development of Parkinson’s disease.
In vitro studies conducted by Dafna et al. on primary midbrain cultures from Sprague–Dawley rats revealed that DQ-induced alterations in the morphology and quantity of dopaminergic neurons and reduced dopamine uptake [16]. Additionally, Singh et al. [54] explored the protective mechanism of standardized extracts of Bacopa monnieri against neurotoxicity induced by PQ and DQ. Their findings suggest that Bacopa monnieri may safeguard rat adrenal medulla pheochromoma differentiated cell line PC12 cells by modulating disrupted cellular redox pathways associated with PD, potentially offering therapeutic benefits in preventing Parkinson’s disease.
Neuronal Axonal Degeneration
Neurons play a crucial role in the nervous system, transmitting information to other neurons or tissues via synapses. Among the components of neurons, the axon, also referred to as a nerve fiber, is the elongated projection responsible for conveying information from the cell body to other neurons or cells. Axonal degeneration is a process associated with neurodegenerative diseases like motor neuron disease [59], Alzheimer’s disease [60], and Huntington’s disease [61].
Fischer and Glass [62] conducted research confirming that oxidative stress constitutes a significant mechanism leading to axonal degeneration. They cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons with a knockout of the SOD1 gene and observed significant axonal degeneration within 48 to 72 h. Importantly, the addition of SOD1 at this stage prevented such degeneration, thus validating that antioxidant treatment can mitigate this degeneration. Their study also assessed the sensitivity of wild-type DRGs to increased superoxide levels induced by DQ. The results demonstrated a positive correlation between axonal degeneration and the dose of DQ, with SOD1 deficiency exacerbating DQ’s toxicity. This finding suggests that DRG axons are susceptible to damage mediated by oxidative stress. DQ elevates intracellular superoxide production through oxidative stress, leading to axonal degeneration and degeneration. These results are a foundation for further investigations into oxidative stress-mediated axonal degeneration.
Pontine Myelinolysis
Central pontine myelinolysis (CPM) is a demyelinating disorder most commonly associated with rapid correction of hyponatremia, although it can also be linked to alcoholism, malnutrition, and chronic liver disease [63–65]. In 2020, Xing et al. [20] reported a case of acute pontine demyelination in acute DQ poisoning, ruling out sodium-related demyelination. Currently, it is believed that CPM’s pathogenesis is tied to the swift correction of hyponatremia, resulting in an imbalance of water and electrolytes inside and outside brain cells, damage to the blood–brain barrier, and apoptosis and myelinolysis of glial cells within the central nervous system. However, the specific mechanism by which DQ leads to CPM remains unclear and may be related to oxidative stress following DQ poisoning, affecting the apoptosis of central nervous system glial cells. This hypothesis warrants further investigation.
Treatment of DQ Nervous System Damage
Currently, there exists no specific drug for the treatment of DQ poisoning, emphasizing the importance of promptly implementing effective measures to remove the poison and enhance the excretion of absorbed toxins in cases of acute DQ poisoning. Hemoperfusion and hemodialysis represent effective methods for eliminating DQ from circulation. While the exact mechanism of neurological damage caused by DQ poisoning remains incompletely understood, it is widely believed that oxidative stress induced by DQ serves as the primary driver of nerve cell death. As long as NADPH and O2 are present, the cyclic redox reaction initiated by DQ continues indefinitely. The depletion of NADPH disrupts glutathione circulation and interferes with other intracellular processes, including energy production and active transporters, thus exacerbating neurotoxicity. Additionally, intracellular protective mechanisms such as glutathione, SOD, and CAT are depleted. Antioxidant compounds may offer relief from DQ’s toxic effects on nerve cells. Reduced glutathione (GSH), the primary intracellular reducing agent, has been reported to alleviate DQ-induced oxidative stress [66]. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), with its active sulfhydryl group (-SH), scavenges oxygen free radicals and serves as a glutathione synthesis precursor, effectively replenishing intracellular reduced glutathione levels [67]. However, strict infusion rate control is essential when administering NAC treatment to prevent allergic or anaphylactoid reactions.
Moreover, studies have shown that pretreatment with N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester arginine (L-NAME), a nonselective inhibitor of nitrate synthase, can reduce the neurotoxicity of DQ poisoning in rats [68]. Resveratrol (RSV) has demonstrated protective effects on the gastrointestinal tract and nerves by mitigating DQ-induced disruption of antioxidant enzymes, reducing ROS production, alleviating mitochondrial depolarization, improving mitochondrial morphology, and inducing mitochondrial phagocytosis [69–73]. Additionally, standardized extracts of Bacopa monnieri have been reported to protect nerve cells from DQ-induced damage by modulating PD-altered cellular redox pathways [54].
Despite our best efforts, current treatments do not guarantee the survival of all patients with DQ poisoning. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an antidote or an effective treatment for DQ poisoning. Potential avenues include conducting in vitro and in vivo studies to evaluate the effects of inducers of efflux transporters and facilitating the release of DQ residues from cells and their excretion through feces or urine to minimize toxicity. Complex formation with DQ may inhibit its cell entry and serve as a detoxification method. For patients with high-dose poisoning, the possibility of central nervous system injury should be anticipated, and cranial imaging (MR or CT) should be promptly conducted. When necessary, cerebrospinal fluid toxicology analysis and cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement should be performed to enable the early detection of central nervous system lesions and the implementation of timely treatment plans.
Conclusion and Perspectives
Neurological damage resulting from DQ poisoning is not only common but also clinically severe, often leading to a poor prognosis [68, 74]. The limited research on DQ poisoning in the past can be attributed to the relatively low number of DQ poisoning cases. However, as the use of DQ becomes more widespread, especially as a substitute for PQ, the incidence of DQ poisoning is expected to rise. Consequently, the number of cases involving neurological symptoms after poisoning is also likely to increase.
Although current treatment methods involve the use of antioxidants and symptomatic supportive care, these approaches offer limited benefits for patients with severe neurological symptoms. The precise mechanism underlying neurological damage caused by DQ poisoning remains unclear. However, it has been observed that mitigating the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra through the regulation of mitophagy and the modulation of the inflammatory cascade of microglial activation in response to oxidative stress may hold promise. Reducing oxidative stress-mediated axonal degeneration represents a potential avenue for treating DQ nerve injury.
In the future, further research is imperative to elucidate the mechanisms of DQ poisoning. This knowledge can be the foundation for identifying therapeutic targets within the damage mechanism and developing targeted specific antidotes. These efforts are essential to provide more effective treatment for patients with DQ poisoning, ultimately reducing mortality rates and improving the quality of life for those affected.
Author Contribution
Yanguang Ren: conceptualization, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; Feng Guo: conceptualization, writing—review and revising; Lin Wang: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision.
Funding
This work was supported by the 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital [40B] and the China Medical University High-quality Development Special Fund [2023JH2/20200043].
Data Availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Feng Guo and Lin Wang contributed equally to the work.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Feng Guo, Email: guofengjizhen@163.com.
Lin Wang, Email: wanglin906731@163.com.
References
- 1.Crabtree HC, Rose MS (1976) Early effects of diquat on plasma corticosteroid concentrations in rats [J]. Biochem Pharmacol 25(22):2465–2468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adams RD, Lupton D, Good AM et al (2009) UK childhood exposures to pesticides 2004–2007: a TOXBASE toxicovigilance study [J]. Arch Dis Child 94(6):417–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Magalhães N, Carvalho F, Dinis-Oliveira RJ (2018) Human and experimental toxicology of diquat poisoning: toxicokinetics, mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and treatment [J]. Hum Exp Toxicol 37(11):1131–1160. 10.1177/0960327118765330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rudez J, Sepcić K, Sepcić J (1999) Vaginally applied diquat intoxication [J]. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 37(7):877–879. 10.1081/clt100102470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Manoguerra AS (1990) Full thickness skin burns secondary to an unusual exposure to diquat dibromide [J]. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 28(1):107–110. 10.3109/15563659008993481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI (1974) Percutaneous penetration of some pesticides and herbicides in man [J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 28(1):126–132. 10.1016/0041-008x(74)90137-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Crabtree HC, Lock EA, Rose MS (1977) Effects of diquat on the gastrointestinal tract of rats [J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 41(3):585–595. 10.1016/s0041-008x(77)80012-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Litchfield MH, Daniel JW, Longshaw S (1973) The tissue distribution of the bipyridylium herbicides diquat and paraquat in rats and mice [J]. Toxicology 1(2):155–165. 10.1016/0300-483x(73)90029-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McCarthy LG, Speth CP (1983) Diquat intoxication [J]. Ann Emerg Med 12(6):394–396. 10.1016/s0196-0644(83)80474-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Powell D, Pond SM, Allen TB et al (1983) Hemoperfusion in a child who ingested diquat and died from pontine infarction and hemorrhage [J]. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 20(5):405–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zielonka J, Rybak M, Gebicki J et al (2006) Effect of heparin on viologen-stimulated enzymatic NADH depletion [J]. Chem Res Toxicol 19(5):668–673. 10.1021/tx050336s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ameno K, Fuke C, Shirakawa Y (1994) Different distribution of paraquat and diquat in human poisoning cases after ingestion of a combined herbicide [J]. Arch Toxicol 68(2):134–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charles JM, Abou-Donia MB, Menzel DB (1978) Absorption of paraquat and diquat from the airways of the perfused rat lung [J]. Toxicology 9(1–2):59–67. 10.1016/0300-483x(78)90031-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rose MS, Smith LL, Wyatt I (1974) Evidence for energy-dependent accumulation of paraquat into rat lung [J]. Nature 252(5481):314–315. 10.1038/252314b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vanholder R, Colardyn F, De Reuck J et al (1981) Diquat intoxication: report of two cases and review of the literature [J]. Am J Med 70(6):1267–1271. 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90836-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bonneh-Barkay D, Langston WJ, Di Monte DA (2005) Toxicity of redox cycling pesticides in primary mesencephalic cultures [J]. Antioxid Redox Signal 7(5–6):649–653. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drechsel DA, Patel M (2009) Differential contribution of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes to reactive oxygen species production by redox cycling agents implicated in parkinsonism [J]. Toxicol Sci 112(2):427–434. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yuzheng Wu, Kan Baotian, Wang Wenjun et al (2018) The experimental study of diquat on the half-lethal dose and pothological injuny of related organs in wistor rats. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi[J] 36(11):813–818. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2018.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saeed SA, Wilks MF, Coupe M (2001) Acute diquat poisoning with intracerebral bleeding [J]. Postgrad Med J 77(907):329–332. 10.1136/pmj.77.907.329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xing J, Chu Z, Han D et al (2020) Lethal diquat poisoning manifesting as central pontine myelinolysis and acute kidney injury: a case report and literature review [J]. J Int Med Res 48(7):300060520943824. 10.1177/0300060520943824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ness-Cochinwala M, Proaño JS, Bernstein JN et al (2022) A case of a lethal diquat ingestion in a toddler [J]. J Emergency Med 62(2):e16–e19. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang P, Lin L-Y, Yuan-Qiang Lu (2024) Mid-to-late stage diquat accumulation in the central nervous system: a severe case of oral poisoning [J]. Am J Emerg Med 75:198.e1-198.e5. 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Y (2022) Imaging features of 10 patients with toxic encephalopathy caused by diquat [J]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 40(5):362–365. 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20210713-00349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Linqing Fu, Meiping Ye, et al (2023) Diquat toxic encephalopathy: a case report and imaging analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of CT And MRI 21(06): Total No.164. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2023.06.065
- 25.Guangcai Yu, Jian T et al (2022) Acute diquat poisoning resulting in toxic encephalopathy: a report of three cases [J]. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 60(5):647–650. 10.1080/15563650.2021.2013495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yin J, Liu M, Ren W et al (2015) Effects of dietary supplementation with glutamate and aspartate on diquat-induced oxidative stress in piglets [J]. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122893. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Valavanidis A, Vlahogianni T, Dassenakis M et al (2006) Molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress in aquatic organisms in relation to toxic environmental pollutants [J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 64(2):178–189. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abdollahi M, Ranjbar A, Shadnia S et al (2014) Pesticides and oxidative stress: a review [J]. Med Sci Monit 10:Ra141-Ra147 [PubMed]
- 29.Jia P, Ji S, Zhang H, Chen Y, Wang T (2020) Piceatannol ameliorates hepatic oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction of weaned piglets challenged with diquat [J]. Animals (Basel) 10(7):1239. 10.3390/ani10071239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xiao D, Yuan D, Tan B et al (2019) The role of Nrf2 signaling pathway in Eucommia ulmoides flavones regulating oxidative stress in the intestine of piglets [J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2(2019):9719618. 10.1155/2019/9719618.eCollection2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abe T, Kinda T et al (2006) Relationship between body iron stores and diquat toxicity in male Fischer-344 rats [J]. Biometals 19(6):651–657. 10.1007/s10534-006-9002-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jović-Stosić J, Babić G, Todorović V (2009) Fatal diquat intoxication [J]. Vojnosanit Pregl 66(6):477–481. 10.2298/vsp0906477j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moldogazieva NT, Mokhosoev IM, Feldman NB, Lutsenko SV (2018) ROS and RNS signalling: adaptive redox switches through oxidative/nitrosative protein modifications [J]. Free Radic Res 52(5):507–543. 10.1080/10715762.2018.1457217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fussell KC, Udasin RG, Gray JP et al (2011) Redox cycling and increased oxygen utilization contribute to diquat-induced oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase [J]. Free Radic Biol Med 50(7):874–882. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.12.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cao W, Li J, Yang K, Cao D (2021) An overview of autophagy: mechanism, regulation and research progress [J]. Bull Cancer 108(3):304–322. 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nisar R, Hanson PS, He L, Taylor RW, Blain PG, Morris CM (2015) Diquat causes caspase-independent cell death in SH-SY5Y cells by production of ROS independently of mitochondria [J]. Arch Toxicol 89:1811–1825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Seirafi M, Kozlov G, Gehring K (2015) Parkin structure and function [J]. FEBS J 282(11):2076–2088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chan Nickie C, Salazar AM et al (2011) Broad activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by Parkin is critical for mitophagy[J]. Hum Mol Genet 20(9):1726–37. 10.1093/hmg/ddr048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoshii SR, Kishi C, Ishihara N et al (2011) Parkin mediates proteasome-dependent protein degradation and rupture of the outer mitochondrial membrane[J]. J Biol Chem 286(22):19630–19640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zheng Dongdong, Liu Jia, Piao Hulin et al (2022) ROS-triggered endothelial cell death mechanisms: focus on pyroptosis, parthanatos, and ferroptosis. Front Immunol 13:1039241. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039241. (eCollection 2022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Choi Su Eun, Park Yun Sun, Koh Hyun Chul (2018) NF-κB/p53-activated inflammatory response involves in diquat-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis[J]. Environ Toxicol 33(10):1005–1018. 10.1002/tox.22552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dai C-Q, Luo T-T, Luo S-C et al (2016) p53 and mitochondrial dysfunction: novel insight of neurodegenerative diseases [J]. J Bioenerg Biomembr 48(4):337–347. 10.1007/s10863-016-9669-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cartelli D, Amadeo A, Calogero AM et al (2018) Parkin absence accelerates microtubule aging in dopaminergic neurons[J]. Neurobiol Aging 61:66–74. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pinto M, Nissanka N, Moraes CT (2018) Lack of Parkin anticipates the phenotype and affects mitochondrial morphology and mtDNA levels in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease [J]. J Neurosci 38(4):1042–1053. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1384-17.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Song L, McMackin M, Nguyen A, Cortopassi G (2017) Parkin deficiency accelerates consequences of mitochondrial DNA deletions and Parkinsonism [J]. Neurobiol Dis 100:30–38. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N et al (1998) Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism [J]. Nature 392(6676):605–608. 10.1038/33416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee J-Y, Yoshito Nagano J, Taylor P et al (2010) Disease-causing mutations in parkin impair mitochondrial ubiquitination, aggregation, and HDAC6-dependent mitophagy. J Cell Biol 189(4):671–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Park A, Koh HC (2019) NF-κB/mTOR-mediated autophagy can regulate diquat-induced apoptosis [J]. Arch Toxicol 93(5):1239–1253. 10.1007/s00204-019-02424-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fiesel FC, Ando M, Hudec R et al (2015) (Patho-)physiological relevance of PINK1-dependent ubiquitin phosphorylation[J]. EMBO Rep 16(9):1114–30. 10.15252/embr.201540514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim HJ, Koh HC (2021) Chaperon-mediated autophagy can regulate diquat-induced apoptosis by inhibiting α-synuclein accumulation cooperatively with macroautophagy [J]. Food Chem Toxicol 158:112706. 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Henderson MX, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y (2019) α-Synuclein pathology in Parkinson’s disease and related α-synucleinopathies[J]. Neurosci Lett 709:134316. 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tanner CM, Freya Kamel G, Ross W et al (2011) Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson’s disease [J]. Environ Health Perspect 119(6):866–72. 10.1289/ehp.1002839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sechi GP, Agnetti V, Piredda M et al (1992) Acute and persistent parkinsonism after use of diquat. Neurology 42(1):261–263. 10.1212/wnl.42.1.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Singh M, Murthy V, Ramassamy C (2013) Neuroprotective mechanisms of the standardized extract of Bacopa monniera in a paraquat/ diquat-mediated acute toxicity [J]. Neurochem Int 62(5):530–539. 10.1016/j.neuint.2013.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Moretto A, Colosio C (2011) Biochemical and toxicological evidence of neurological effects of pesticides: the example of Parkinson’s disease[J]. Neurotoxicology 32(4):383–391. 10.1016/j.neuro.2011.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kuter Katarzyna, Nowak Przemysław, Gołembiowska Krystyna et al (2010) Increased reactive oxygen species production in the brain after repeated low-dose pesticide paraquat exposure in rats. A comparison with peripheral tissues[J]. Neurochem Res 35(8):1121–30. 10.1007/s11064-010-0163-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.McCormack AL, Thiruchelvam M, Manning-Bog AB et al (2002) Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: selective degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons caused by the herbicide paraquat[J]. Neurobiol Dis 10(2):119–27. 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lindquist NG, Larsson BS, Lydén-Sokolowski A (1988) Autoradiography of [14C] paraquat or [14C] diquat in frogs and mice: accumulation in neuromelanin [J]. Neurosci Lett 93(1):1–6. 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90002-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lindsey R Fischer, Jonathan D Glass. Axonal degeneration in motor neuron disease [J]. Neurodegener Dis. 2007;4(6):431–42. 10.1159/000107704. Epub 2007 Oct 9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Stokin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL et al (2005) Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease [J]. Science 307(5713):1282–1288. 10.1126/science.1105681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li H, Li SH, Yu ZX, Shelbourne P, Li XJ (2001) Huntingtin aggregate-associated axonal degeneration is an early pathological event in Huntington’s disease mice [J]. J Neurosci 21(21):8473–8481. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08473.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fischer LR, Glass JD (2010) Oxidative stress induced by loss of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1) or superoxide-generating herbicides causes axonal degeneration in mouse DRG cultures [J]. Acta Neuropathol 119(2):249–59. 10.1007/s00401-009-0631-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kumar S, Fowler M et al (2006) Central pontine myelinolysis, an update [J]. Neurol Res 28(3):360–366. 10.1179/016164106X110346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Norenberg MD (2010) Central pontine myelinolysis: historical and mechanistic considerations [J]. Metab Brain Dis 25(1):97–106. 10.1007/s11011-010-9175-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chang Y, An D-H et al (2012) Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis associated with acute hepatic dysfunction [J]. Neurol Sci 33(3):673–676. 10.1007/s10072-011-0838-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wu KC, Zhang Y, Klaassen CD (2012) Nrf2 protects against diquat-induced liver and lung injury [J]. Free Radic Res 46(10):1220–1229. 10.3109/10715762.2012.700709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Santus P, Corsico A, Solidoro P et al (2014) Oxidative stress and respiratory system: pharmacological and clinical reappraisal of N-acetylcysteine [J]. COPD 11(6):705–717. 10.3109/15412555.2014.898040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Djukic M, Jovanovic MD, Ninkovic M et al (2012) Intrastriatal pre-treatment with L-NAME protects rats from diquat neurotoxcity [J]. Ann Agric Environ Med 19(4):666–672 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cao S, Shen Z, Wang C et al (2019) Resveratrol improves intestinal barrier function, alleviates mitochondrial dysfunction and induces mitophagy in diquat challenged piglets [J]. Food Funct 10(1):344–354. 10.1039/c8fo02091d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Xing J, Chu Z, Han D et al (2020) Lethal diquat poisoning manifesting as central pontine myelinolysis and acute kidney injury: a case report and literature review [J]. J Int Med Res 48(7):300060520943824. 10.1177/0300060520943824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yuan Y, Cruzat VF et al (2016) Philip Newsholme, Regulation of SIRT1 in aging: roles in mitochondrial function and biogenesis [J]. Mech Ageing Dev 155:10–21. 10.1016/j.mad.2016.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mo W, Xianjian Wu, Jia G et al (2018) Roles of dietary supplementation with arginine or N-carbamylglutamate in modulating the inflammation, antioxidant property, and mRNA expression of antioxidant-relative signaling molecules in the spleen of rats under oxidative stress [J]. Anim Nutr 4(3):322–328. 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cao S, Wang C, Yan J, Li X, Wen J, Hu C (2020) Curcumin ameliorates oxidative stress-induced intestinal barrier injury and mitochondrial damage by promoting Parkin dependent mitophagy through AMPK-TFEB signal pathway [J]. Free Radic Biol Med 1(147):8–22. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fortenberry GZ, Beckman J, Schwartz A et al (2016) Magnitude and characteristics of acute paraquat and diquat-related illnesses in the US:1998–2013[J]. Environ Res 146:191–199. 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jinsong Z, Fengtong H et al (2020) Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acute diquat poisoning. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine 29(10):1282–1289. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.10.002 [Google Scholar]
- 76.World Health O (2020) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification 2019 [EB/OL]. World Health Organization, Geneva [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.