Abstract
It is known that telomere length (TL) (evaluated with T/S ratio) is shortened in the presence of obesity. In this study, we aimed to investigate how obesity in adolescents and non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) within the obese group affect TL and the clinical significance of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene MNS16A VNTR variant in terms of NAFLD. Adolescents with exogenous obesity and healthy controls (aged 10–19 years) who applied to our adolescent outpatient clinic between May-October 2023 were included in this study. We performed upper abdominal ultrasonography to investigate the presence of NAFLD in adolescents with obesity and divided into two groups: those without hepatosteatosis (obese NAFLD (-)) and those with hepatosteatosis (obese NAFLD (+)). We recorded body weight, height, waist circumference, and blood pressure measurements and measured the T/S ratio (telomere sequence copy number/gene single copy number) by the Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction method. The groups were compared using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Eighty-three obese adolescents [63 NAFLD(+) 20 NAFLD(-)] and 69 lean controls were included in the study. Pairwise comparisons revealed that T/S ratio was significantly lower in the obese NAFLD (-) group than the obese NAFLD (+) and the control group (p = 0.025, p = 0.007, respectively). T/S ratio was lower in the LL allele group than in the other alleles (p = 0.022) and slightly higher in the obese group with metabolic syndrome compared to the obese group without metabolic syndrome (p = 0.072). hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant LL allele had a negative correlation with T/S ratio among the obese adolescent group. Patients with LL alleles had higher ALT, GGT, HOMA-IR, and ALT/AST. Diastolic blood pressure had a significant correlation with the T/S ratio. The T/S ratio was shorter in the obese adolescent group compared to healthy ones but was higher in the NAFLD (+) obese compared to the NAFLD (-) obese. ALT level and ALT/AST ratio were higher, T/S ratio was lower in the hTERT MNS16A VNTR variant LL allele group among obese adolescents. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the T/S ratio and diastolic blood pressure in obese adolescents.
Keywords: Telomere length, hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene, NAFLD, Obese adolescents, Metabolic syndrome
Subject terms: Gastrointestinal diseases, Hepatology
Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic metabolic disease with progressive hepatosteatosis without alcohol abuse or other liver diseases1,2. NAFLD causes liver-related morbidities and mortalities, and it has an association with chronic illnesses like hypertension and diabetes mellitus 3,4. Obesity is associated with an increase in the prevalence and severity of NAFLD cases5. Adiposity, defined by body mass index (BMI), is a significant risk factor for NAFLD. Prospective studies in children show a clear association between childhood adiposity and adverse liver disease in adolescence6.
Telomeres are nucleoprotein complexes that attach to the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes7 and are of fundamental importance in maintaining genome stability, as the decrease in telomere length (TL) during cell division will initiate cellular senescence8. This type of cellular aging is commonly referred to as replicative aging and is linked to telomere biology. Telomere shortening limits the replicative capacity and the number of cells participating in tissue regeneration. Therefore, the regenerative potential of an organ depends on the cell population with sufficient telomere reserves necessary for cell proliferation. In chronic diseases associated with continuous tissue renewal, such as cirrhosis, a high regenerative effect occurs on a rapidly proliferating subpopulation of cells, which increases the telomere shortening rate by going through several cycles of cell division9. Genetic data indicate that NAFLD is common in patients with telomeropathy. This finding suggests that steatosis may be a consequence of hepatocellular aging or a trigger for the progression of liver disease, as seen in animal models10,11. In NAFLD patients, triggering factors such as obesity and insulin resistance also cause chronic liver damage and a regeneration state characterized by telomere shortening and aging in hepatocytes12. Obesity is also associated with chronic inflammation mediated by cytokines (and adipocytokines), increased production of reactive oxygen, nitrogen species (pro-oxidation, decreased anti-oxidation), and increased systemic oxidative stress13,14.
Telomerase which consists of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and a telomere RNA component is the main regulator of telomere length15,16. It is an enzyme that protects the telomere ends that shorten with each division by using the RNA it carries in its structure as a template and prevents chromosome shortening. However, since it is in small amounts in somatic cells, telomere shortening and cell senescence continue over time. Telomerase has three subunits: human telomerase RNA (hTERC), human telomerase-related protein (hTEP1) or dyskerin, and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). hTERC and hTEP1 constitutively express, so the enzymatic activity of telomerase depends on hTERT transcription17. The hTERT gene encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase. The polymorphic tandem repeat minisatellites of hTERT (MNS16A) were first identified in a study on lung cancer patients. MNS16A, an antisense transcript of the hTERT gene, is located downstream of exon 16 of the TERT gene and upstream of the putative promoter region of an antisense hTERT transcript18. The MNS16A variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism of the hTERT gene acts as a regulator of hTERT promoter activity19. A recent meta-analysis reported that this gene variant predisposes to cancer and that this is variable according to ethnicity (mostly in Asians)20. In NAFLD, telomerase activity is impaired with increased free fatty acid uptake at the cellular level and increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)21. However, there is no research yet on the relationship between NAFLD, which predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant. Differentiating the effects of impaired telomerase activity or gene variants is important for NAFLD pathogenesis.
Adolescence is a separate period when obesity is frequently observed and includes NAFLD characteristics that differ from adults. Few studies aim to investigate the relationship between TL and NAFLD in the pediatric population and none in adolescents. In addition, although the relationships between obesity, NAFLD, and TL have been examined, the comparison between groups with and without NAFLD in obese individuals is also critical. Although the relationship between the hTERT VNTR MNS16A gene variant of telomerase, which plays a particular role in TL, and various cancers has been examined, it is necessary to investigate its relationship with NAFLD, which causes shortening in TL and causes HCC development at earlier ages. Therefore, in this study TL and the MNS16A VNTR variant of the hTERT gene in obese adolescents with and without NAFLD were examined, and association with clinical parameters were investigated by comparing it with the healthy adolescent group.
Materials and methods
We included obese and healthy adolescents aged 10–19 who applied to the Adolescent Health Outpatient Clinic of Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, between May and October, 2023. The obese group consisted of exogenously obese non-syndromic adolescents with a BMI SDS ≥ 2, without additional chronic diseases. The control group included healthy adolescents without acute or chronic diseases, were not under medication, and had a BMI between − 1 and + 1 SDS. An experienced radiologist performed upper abdominal ultrasonography to examine the presence of NAFLD in adolescents with exogenous obesity. According to the ultrasonography results, obese adolescents were allocated into two groups: without hepatosteatosis (obese NAFLD (-)) and with hepatosteatosis (obese NAFLD (+)). We defined hepatosteatosis as grade 1 if there was a slight increase in echogenicity, grade 2 if the hyperechogenic liver appearance prevented the image of the portal vein wall, and grade 3 if the portal vein wall and diaphragm were not visible due to hyperechogenic liver22. After a comprehensive physical examination, we recorded body weight, height, waist circumference, and blood pressure. Height was measured with a tape measure fixed to the wall, with bare feet, feet together, and the adolescent’s head, back, hips, and heels touching the wall. Body mass index was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) by the square of height (m2). Waist circumference was measured with a non-flexible tape measure from the middle of the distance between the lowest rib and the iliac crest while the participant was upright. Waist circumference and BMI SDS were noted by looking at the reference curves for Turkish children created by Neyzi et al.23. Those with a standard deviation of + 2 SDS were considered obese patients, and between − 1/+1 SDS were included in the lean control group. An experienced clinician performed arterial blood pressure measurements, and we calculated SDS values24.
Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee approved this cross-sectional and single-center study (2023/594). Informed consents were obtained from the adolescents and their parents. The study was conducted by adhering the Decleration of Helsinki.
Laboratory analysis
After 12 hours of fasting, participants gave venous blood samples in an EDTA and a dry tube, and the laboratory studied biochemical parameters on the same day. Blood samples taken into EDTA tubes were stored at -20 degrees and given to the study collectively for genetic analysis. The laboratory isolated the Genomic DNA from blood and carried it into EDTA tubes, and used Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) with the Human Relative Telomere Length Quantification qPCR Assay Kit (ELK Biotechnology, Wuhan, China). DNA samples were diluted between 0.5 and 2 ng/ µl. Two qPCR reactions were prepared for each genomic DNA sample, one for telomere sequence copy number and the other for reference gene single copy number. Reference gene single copy (SCR) primer specifically recognizes the 78 bp region on human chromosome 11. Also, the amplified samples developed a 78 bp long band in agarose gel. T/S ratios were calculated in each patient’s sample with the 2-ΔΔCt formulation using the reference gene single copy number (S) and the telomere sequence copy number (T)25. The hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR variant analysis was performed with the PCR method. DNA samples were amplified under appropriate PCR conditions using F: 5’AGGATTTCTGATCTCTGAAGGGTG-3’ and R: 5’-TCTGCCTGAGGAAGGACGTATG-3’ primers for the region to be analyzed. Then, the samples were run on gel electrophoresis and genotyped under UV light. The L allele showed bands of 302 bp and 332 bp, and the S allele showed bands of 243 bp and 272 bp26.
Statistical analysis
We assessed normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Q-Q plots and presented data as mean+/-sd or median (interquartile range) by distribution. We used the Mann-Whitney u test for comparing two groups with non-normal distributed continuous data, the Student’s t-test for normally distributed data, and the Welch t-test for normally distributed data with non-homogenous variances (variance homogeneity was tested with Levene’s test). We used the Pearson test for the assessment of correlations after converting non-normal data to a normal distribution with Ln, square root, or Boxcox transformations and Kendall’s tau test to compare groups with nominal data. A p-value < 0.05 was accepted for significance.
We built H1 (correlation) and H0 (independence) hypotheses for Bayesian calculations (stretched beta prior width set at 1) and presented Bayes factors as BF10, including evidence levels (anecdotal, moderate, strong, and very strong). We built a generalized linear model with the correlated variables and presented an estimated marginal means table and graph. We used the JAMOVI 2.3.18 statistical package program with jsq, gamlj, and moretests extension packs.
Results
We included 83 obese patients and 69 lean controls in the study. NAFLD was positive in 75.9% (n = 63) of the patient group.
As we compared NAFLD – and NAFLD + groups among obese patients; serum ALT was higher in the NAFLD + group by 4 IU, GGT by 4.5, TG by 30.6, LDL by 14, transaminase index by 0.2, and t/s ratio by 268, where blood urea-nitrogen was lower by 1.4. The descriptive features and statistical results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
The descriptive status and statistical results of the study group.
| Total obese group (n = 83) | Obese NAFLD (–) (n = 20) | Obese NAFLD (+) (n = 63) | Lean control (n = 69) | p* | p** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 14.4+/-2.5 | 13.8+/-2.4 | 14.6+/-2.6 | 13.9+/-2.4 | 0.276 | 0.88 |
| Female | 45.8% (n = 38) | 26.3% (n = 10) | 73.7% (n = 28) | 49.3% (n = 34) | 0.664 | 0.864 |
| Male | 54.2% (n = 45) | 22.2% (n = 10) | 77.8% (n = 35) | 50.7% (n = 35) | ||
| BMI SDS | 2.64+/-0.70 | 2.54+/-0.59 | 2.67+/-0.73 | 0.101+/-1.11 | 0.482 | < 0.001 |
| WC SDS | 3.43+/-0.66 | 3.02+/-0.53 | 3.54+/-0.65 | 0.80+/-0.66 | 0.004 | < 0.001 |
| SBP SDS | 0.60+/-0.92 | 0.41+/-1.07 | 0.65+/-0.87 | -0.15+/-0.94 | 0.332 | 0.033 |
| DBP SDS | 0.99+/-0.85 | 0.60+/-0.65 | 1.09+/-0.87 | 0.35+/-0.92 | 0.042 | 0.294 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.23 (2.82–5.84) | 3.41 (1.86–4.83) | 4.64 (2.85–5.86) | 1.96 (1.38–2.49) | 0.214 | < 0.001 |
| AST(U/L) | 19.8 (16.0-22.8) | 19.1 (15.5–20.4) | 19.9 (16.2–23.2) | 18.6 (15.2–24.2) | 0.163 | 0.594 |
| ALT(U/L) | 20.0 (15.0-30.1) | 17.1 (14.7–20.6) | 21.7 (15.3–31.9) | 13.1 (10.2–16.6) | 0.064 | 0.046 |
| GGT(U/L) | 16.0 (12.0-21.5) | 12.5 (9.25-14.0) | 17.0 (14.0–23.0) | 10.0 (9.0–13) | < 0.001 | 0.388 |
| T. Bil.(mg/dL) | 0.39 (0.26–0.5) | 0.42 (0.33–0.59) | 0.35 (0.24–0.47) | 0.44 (0.35–0.61) | 0.084 | 0.893 |
| Chol.(mg/dL) | 150.7+/-30.4 | 142.2+/-22.9 | 153.4+/-32.1 | 150.9+/-31.3 | 0.151 | 0.256 |
| Trig.(mg/dL) | 97.1 (68.6128.3) | 80.6 (65.0-106.9) | 111.2 (74.2-144.8) | 72.4 (55.4-112.9) | 0.057 | 0.872 |
| LDL-C(mg/dL) | 89.0 (73.5–109.0) | 77.0 (73.5–91.0) | 91.0 (74.0-113.5) | 82.0 (75.0–94.0) | 0.055 | 0.391 |
| HDL-C(mg/dL) | 43.9 (37.4–50.3) | 46.0 (40.6–55.3) | 43.7 (37.3–48.6) | 51.9 (43.8–57.5) | 0.047 | 0.711 |
| Kreatinin(mg/dL) | 0.61+/-0.13 | 0.62+/-0.10 | 0.62+/-0.14 | 0.59+/-0.14 | 0.83 | 0.421 |
| Bun(mg/dL) | 10.5+/-2.5 | 11.6+/-1.9 | 10.2+/-2.6 | 10.4+/-2.9 | 0.023 | 0.075 |
| Albumin(g/dL) | 4.72+/-0.26 | 4.70+/-0.23 | 4.73+/-0.27 | 4.73+/-0.27 | 0.535 | 0.608 |
| fT4(ng/dL) | 15.3+/-1.8 | 15.6+/-1.4 | 15.2+/-1.9 | 15.7+/-2.5 | 0.396 | 0.95 |
| TSH(mIU/L) | 2.61+/-1.37 | 2.48+/-1.28 | 2.65+/-1.40 | 2.14+/-1.1 | 0.707 | 0.258 |
| Cortisol(ng/mL) | 9.61+/-4.32 | 8.52+/-4.05 | 9.87+/-4.42 | 10.02+/-4.76 | 0.502 | 0.558 |
| Alt/Ast Ratio | 1.13+/-0.40 | 0.98+/-0.19 | 1.18+/-0.44 | 0.78+/-0.30 | 0.116 | 0.001 |
| TyG | 8.29+/-0.53 | 8.11+/-0.40 | 8.35+/-0.55 | 8.06+/-0.50 | 0.076 | 0.689 |
| T/S Ratio | 2034 (1567–3030) | 1852 (1035–2337) | 2120 (1612–3421) | 2470 (1783–3795) | 0.021 | < 0.001 |
| MNS16A-VNTR LL allele % | 31.3% (n = 26) | 25% (n = 5) | 33.3% (n = 21) | 36.8% (n = 25) | 0.484 | 0.329 |
BMI SDS body mass index standard deviation score, WC waist circumference.
*Comparison between NAFLD + and NAFLD – obese patients. ** Comparison between NAFLD- obese patients and the control. All calculations were performed with students t test after transforming data to normal in case of non-normal distribution.
T/S ratio was prominently higher in control group compared with the obese group, but did not reach statistical significance (mean difference 366 units, p = 0.073, Mann-Whitney u test).
T/S ratio was prominently higher in metabolic syndrome positive group compared with metabolic syndrome negative group among obese patients, but again did not reach statistical significance (mean difference 515 units, p = 0.072, Mann-Whitney u test).
A total of 33.6% (n = 51) had LL, 51.3% (n = 78) had LS, and 14.5% (n = 22) had SS alleles where 0.7% (n = 1) did not have hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant among obese patients.
T/S ratio and htert VNTR gene associations among obese patient group
As we assessed the correlation co-efficients among obese patients regarding T/S ratio and hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR (binomial result as L/L and others), calculations revealed a very strong correlation between T/S ratio and diastolic TA SDS (r = 0.402, p < 0.001 (95%CI:0.196–0.574)). There was no significant correlation between gender and T/S ratio (r = 0.034, BF10: 0.159, moderate evidence for independence), and gender and hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant (r = 0.151, BF10:1.084, anecdotal evidence). But hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene LL allel had a negative correlation with T/S ratio (r = 0.194, BF10:4.282, moderate evidence). hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant with LL allels had correlation with ALT level and ALT/AST index. Patients with LL alleles had higher ALT by 5.7 unit (p = 0.012, Mann- Whitney u test), higher GGT by 3 unit (p = 0.053, Mann-Whiyney u test), higher HOMA-IR by 1.6 (p = 0.012, student’s t test), and higher ALT/AST ratio by 0.2 (p = 0.055, student’s t test); which resulted as strong evidence for ALT, ALT/AST ratio, and anecdotal evidence for HOMA-IR and GGT (Bayesian kendall’s tau test) (Table 2).
Table 2.
The descriptive status and statistical results of the study group.
| T/S Ratio | hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese | Lean | Obese | Lean | |||||
| Pearson | BF₁₀ | Pearson | BF₁₀ | Kendall | BF₁₀ | Kendall | BF₁₀ | |
| Age | 0.198 | 0.663 AI | 0.053 | 0.166MI | 0.167 | 1.703 A | 093 | 0.293MI |
| BMI SDS | 0.196 | 0.642 AI | 0.132 | 0.264 MI | 0.025 | 0.152 MI | 0.119 | 0.409 AI |
| WC SDS | 0.148 | 0.32 MI | 0.174 | 0.389 AI | 0.138 | 0.719 AI | 0.062 | 0.212 MI |
| SBP SDS | 0.122 | 0.248 MI | 0.076 | 0.188 MI | 0.070 | 0.222 MI | 0.071 | 0.23 MI |
| DBP SDS | 0.402 | 90.2 VS | 0.064 | 0.179 MI | 0.066 | 0.213 MI | 0.020 | 0.171 MI |
| HOMA-IR | 0.037 | 0.147 MI | -0.101 | 0.219MI | 0.166 | 1.526 A | -0.052 | 0.207 MI |
| AST(U/L) | 0.059 | 0.159 MI | -0.142 | 0.291 MI | 0.155 | 1.135 A | 0.065 | 0.215 MI |
| ALT(U/L) | 0.043 | 0.149 MI | -0.029 | 0.156 MI | 0.234 | 16.1 S | 0.113 | 0.388 AI |
| GGT(U/L) | 0.09 | 0.192 MI | 0.022 | 0.169 MI | 0.182 | 2.081 A | 0.316 | 51.9 VS |
| T. Bil.(mg/dL) | -0.078 | 0.185 MI | 0.323 | 2.158 A | 0.009 | 0.16 MI | 0.049 | 0.21 MI |
| Chol.(mg/dL) | 0.09 | 0.189 MI | 0.020 | 0.157 MI | 0.015 | 0.146 MI | 0.041 | 0.182 MI |
| Trig.(mg/dL) | 0.102 | 0.208 MI | -0.019 | 0.157 MI | 0.028 | 0.153 MI | -0.064 | 0.213 MI |
| LDL-C(mg/dL) | 0.184 | 0.532 AI | -0.028 | 0.159 MI | 0.007 | 0.144 MI | 0.034 | 0.176 MI |
| HDL-C(mg/dL) | -0.104 | 0.21 MI | -0.047 | 0.166 MI | 0.106 | 0.387 AI | -0.151 | 0.757 AI |
| Crea.(mg/dL) | -0.023 | 0.141 MI | 0.186 | 0.466 AI | 0.056 | 0.189 MI | 0.162 | 1.011 A |
| BUN(mg/dL) | 0.107 | 0.216 MI | 0.056 | 0.168 MI | 0.059 | 0.194 MI | 0.088 | 0.273 MI |
| Albumin(g/dL) | 0.01 | 0.142 MI | 0.246 | 1 A | 0.058 | 0.195 MI | 0.094 | 0.291 MI |
| fT4(ng/dL) | -0.052 | 0.156 MI | 0.045 | 0.167 MI | 0.165 | 1.385 A | 0.121 | 0.428 AI |
| TSH(mIU/L) | 0.012 | 0.141 MI | -0.029 | 0.161 MI | 0.151 | 0.99 AI | 0.068 | 0.223 MI |
| Cortisol(ng/mL) | 0.103 | 0.258 MI | 0.375 | 0.618 AI | 0.122 | 0.363 AI | -0.178 | 0.524 AI |
| ALT/AST | 0.012 | 0.14 MI | 0.049 | 0.165 MI | 0.233 | 15.7 S | 0.129 | 0.506 AI |
| TyG | 0.097 | 0.2 MI | -0.047 | 0.165 MI | 0.064 | 0.206 MI | -0.078 | 0.244 MI |
BMI SDS body mass index standard deviation score, WC waist circumference.
*Comparison between NAFLD + and NAFLD – obese patients. ** Comparison between NAFLD- obese patients and the control. All calculations were performed with students t test after transforming data to normal in case of non-normal distribution.
Significant values are in bold.
T/S ratio was independent from WC SDS, Systolic Blood Pressure SDS, HOMA-IR, AST, ALT, GGT, Total Bilirubin, Cholesterol, Triglyceride, BUN, Albumin, fT4, TSH, cortisol, ALT/AST index, and TyG levels with moderate evidence.
hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant was independent from BMI SDS, Systolic Blood Pressure SDS, diastolic Blood Pressure SDS, Total Bilirubin, Cholesterol, Triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol, creatinine, BUN, Albumin, and TyG levels with moderate evidence.
Diastolic blood pressure had significant correlation with T/S ratio (GLM, R2:0.195, LLR X2:24216). The graph (Fig. 1) and estimated marginal means table (Table 3) is presented.
Fig. 1.
The correlation graph regarding diastolic blood pressure SDS and T/S ratio among obese group (R2:0.195, p < 0.01).
Table 3.
The estimated marginal means table regarding diastolic blood pressure and T/S ratio.
| Diastolic blood pressure SDS | Mean T/S ratio |
|---|---|
| −2 | 861 (838–884) |
| −1 | 1762 (1748–1775) |
| 0 | 2671 (2659–2682) |
| 1 | 3579 (3560–3598) |
| 2 | 4480 (4450–4510) |
T/S ratio and hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant associations among the control group
Individuals with hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant LL alleles had lower GGT by 3.5 units (p = 0.002, Welch t-test which resulted as very strong evidence in Bayesian Kendall’s tau test). There was no statistically significant difference between hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene alleles regarding T/S ratio (p = 0.15, student’s t test) among the control group.
T/S ratio and hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant associations between the NAFLD(+), NAFLD(-), and the control group
T/S ratio was statistically different among 3 groups: control, NAFLD (+) and NAFLD (−) (p = 0.009, ANOVA using normalized values with BOXCOX formation). Pairwise comparisons revealed that T/S ratio in obese NAFLD (−) group was significantly lower from obese NAFLD (+) by 1198 unit (p = 0.025) and the control group by 1074 units (p = 0.007) (Tukey pairwise comparison test) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the three groups regarding T/S ratio. (p = 0.009).The table is formed with the exact values.
hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variant LL alleles were at 25.0% in NAFLD (−), 33.3% at NAFLD (+), and 36.8% at control groups (p = 0.617, chi-square test). T/S ratio was lower in LL allel group by 542.6 units compared with the other alleles (p = 0.022, student’s t test) across all groups (obese and control).
Discussion
In this study, where T/S ratio and hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR gene variants were examined in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and hepatosteatosis groups in the adolescent age group, T/S ratio was longer in NAFLD(+) obese adolescents compared to NAFLD(−) obese adolescents. In addition, HOMA-IR values were higher, and T/S ratio was lower in LL genotypic variant patients among obese patients. Moreover, T/S ratio was lower in LL variants across all groups (obese and control). There were no significant difference between healthy and obese adolescents in terms of T/S ratio, but T/S ratio was lower in the obese NAFLD(−) group compared to obese NAFLD(+) and control groups. In addition, T/S ratio was correlated with diastolic blood pressure in obese adolescents. Our study is the first study examining the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant regarding obesity and hepatosteatosis.
Although studies show that obesity and oxidative stress lead to telomere abrasion, decreased TL, and accelerated biological aging, the findings on this subject have a weak to moderate level of evidence27. Studies report that BMI was inversely correlated with TL in adults, and increased telomere abrasion and decreased TL with age were associated with increased morbidity and mortality in various diseases27,28. While increasing BMI resulted in higher blood volume, increased blood cells, and telomere shortening, weight loss was positively associated with telomere lengthening13. A recent meta-analysis examining the relationship between obesity and TL in children and adolescents has similarly shown that obesity is associated with TL shortening29. Tang et al.30 examined considerable population data and revealed that long TL is associated with lower NAFLD incidence. In the meta-analysis conducted by Khosravaniardakani et al.31, it is mentioned that telomere length decreased with weight gain in adults. However, this meta-analysis also suggested that age distribution might be related to telomere size. In our study, which examined the adolescent group with a limited age range, there was no significant difference between obese and control patients regarding T/S ratio.
Focusing on NAFLD diagnosis among pediatric age group, there are limited studies examining the relationship between TL and NAFLD in obese children. Ooi et al.32 diagnosed NAFLD with liver enzyme levels and suggested that there was no relationship between TL and NAFLD in obese children. We evaluated NAFLD with ultrasonography and found that T/S ratio was lower in the obese group compared to healthy adolescents, but TL was higher in the NAFLD(+) group compared to the NAFLD(-) group within the obese group. In the study by Wojcicki et al.33, which included histological liver findings and 96-week follow-up of TL course in NAFLD(+) children, prolonged TL was associated with increased lobular inflammation in the liver after liver biopsies. They suggested that this situation might lead to complications related to NAFLD in later ages33. Similar to this study, we found shorter T/S ratio in NAFLD(-) obese adolescents compared to NAFLD(+) obese adolescents in our study. In addition to Wojcicki’s study, our study population consists of obese NAFLD patients. We predict that the increased T/S ratio in the NAFLD (+) group in our data might be because we studied with a more specific population group. When we focus on the adult period, a study conducted in the adult age group reported that TL was shorter in NAFLD (+) individuals with increased fibrosis, and TL was shortening with aging34. Since our study included adolescents, we could not perform diagnostic biopsy and assessment of fibrosis. In light of the literature and our data, we can say that TL was longer in obese patients compared with the control group and in NAFLD (+) obese adolescents compared with NAFLD (−) obese. But this situation reverses with the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis in adulthood.
There was no statistically significant difference between the NAFLD (−) and (+) groups by LL allele. However, the longer TL in the NAFLD (+) group compared with the NAFLD(−) group might be due to multiple factors, such as genetic/epigenetic factors, compensatory mechanisms in the early period of NAFLD presence, or metabolic/inflammatory features and abnormal fat distribution (in more critical regions) in NAFLD (−) group. However, we need extended studies to answer this question.
Regarding the studies examining the relationship between TL and blood pressure, Martens et al.35 reported a negative correlation between telomere length and diastolic blood pressure in newborn children. In the same study, the authors did not find a relationship between TL and systolic blood pressure in newborns. Al-Attas et al.36 also reported no relationship between blood pressure values and TL in the young child age group. A meta-analysis based on adult studies concluded that telomere length was shorter in hypertensive adults37. However, another study conducted on adult patients reported a non-linear relationship between TL and diastolic hypertension: A positive correlation between diastolic blood pressure with TL at the early ages, a mild decrease, and then a constant continuation in diastolic blood pressure was observed in telomere lengths at later ages38. Our study results, in which we found a strong positive correlation between diastolic blood pressure and T/S in the obese adolescent group, fit this literature’s findings. We predict that T/S can be considered a risk factor in the development of hypertension. This positive correlation between diastolic blood pressure and TL might be because of compensatory mechanisms in early hypertension, genetic influences, or lifestyle. We emphasize that similar findings suggesting compensatory mechanism were presented by Huang et al.38. However, we need multicenter and multinational prospective longitudinal studies for the development of diastolic hypertension in obese patients and the relationships between T/S, weight change, and diastolic blood pressure SDSs.
There is limited literature data on the hTERT-MNS16A-VNTR L/L genotype, but it is associated with a short life span in some studies39. The studies on the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant were conducted primarily with malignant patient groups18,40; hence, to our knowledge, this study is the first study examining the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant in an obese adolescent group. In our results, the LL variant was associated with high ALT, ALT/AST rate, HOMA-IR, and GGT in obese adolescents, and these results significantly demonstrated the relationship between the presence of NAFLD and the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant, especially for the LL allele. Huda et al.41 investigated the effect of the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant in adult diabetic patients and reported that SS alleles had an association with type 2 diabetes. However, another study reported that the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR LL allele shortens human life42. In other studies in the literature, the MNS16A VNTR-243 short allele is seen more frequently in low-stage patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and longer TL was detected in these patients43. In our study, we found that the T/S rate in the LL variant was lower both in the obese patient group and in the whole study group (obese + control). However, the short allele does not always have a good prognosis, as the short allele was associated with progression and poor response to treatment in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin B-lymphoma44. According to the literature data, we need more detailed studies on the MNS16A-VNTR long and short alleles.
Lastly, North American society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition (NASPGHAN) suggests using ALT levels for screening NAFLD45, hence European society for pediatric gastroenterology hepatology and nutrition (ESPGHAN) advices using ultrasonographic imaging with ALT levels46, not to miss cases. However, we established the diagnosis with ultrasonographic imagings which were performed by a highly specialized radiologist.
The most important limitation of our study is that we established the diagnosis of steatosis with ultrasonography- there was no tissue diagnosis. In addition, our study was cross-sectional -we did not investigate the T/S alteration with treatment. Other limitations were that we did not include tanner stage, we did not diagnose NAFLD with magnetic rezonans imaging, and we did not assess metabolic reasons of NAFLD. The positive aspect of our study was that it evaluated a specific population, the obese adolescent age group. We think these are contributory analyses for this age group and reveal the relationship between T/S and NAFLD in young people. In addition, this is the first study to examine the hTERT gene MNS16A-VNTR variant in the pediatric age group.
Conclusion
As a result, T/S was higher in obese patients compared to the control group. T/S was higher in the NAFLD (+) compared to the NAFLD (-) among the obese group. Although T/S was higher in patients with metabolic syndrome, it did not reach statistical significance. T/S was lower, and ALT and ALT/AST ratios were higher in the LL allele of the telomerase MNS16A VNTR variant in obese adolescents. There was a strong positive correlation between T/S and diastolic blood pressure in obese adolescents. The relationship between T/S and NAFLD and metabolic syndrome in obese adolescents should be clarified with further studies. In addition, longitudinal studies on telomerase gene variants should be performed and evaluated with patient follow-up.
Acknowledgements
Dr. Ibrahim Kandemir and Associate Prof. Dr. Aylin Yetim Sahin contributed to the article at similar levels.
Author contributions
Authors’ contributions: Conceptualization: AYS, SK, FB, SPMethodology: IK, AYS, SK, FB, SPFormal analysis and investigation: IK, MSFigures: IK, MSWriting - review and editing: IK, AYS, YO, SK, MS, MTA, MP, FB, SPResources: IK, AYS, YO, SK, MS, MTA, MP, FB, SPSupervision: AYS, MP, FB, SP.
Funding
This study was partially supported by the Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit of Istanbul University under Grant [number: TTU-2023-40010]. The study’s early results were presented and discussed at the 46th Pediatric Days Congress between 14 and 16 April 2024 in Istanbul.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.-Powell, E. E., Wong, V. W. & Rinella, M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lancet. 397 (10290), 2212–2224. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32511-3 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.- Chalasani, N. et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American gastroenterological association, American association for the study of liver diseases, and American college of gastroenterology [published correction appears in Gastroenterology. ;143(2):503]. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(7):1592–1609. doi: (2012). 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.- Paik, J. M., Golabi, P., Younossi, Y., Mishra, A. & Younossi, Z. M. Changes in the global burden of chronic liver diseases from 2012 to 2017: the growing impact of NAFLD. Hepatology 72 (5), 1605–1616. 10.1002/hep.31173 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.- Alexander, M. et al. Risks and clinical predictors of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses in adults with diagnosed NAFLD: real-world study of 18 million patients in four European cohorts. BMC Med .17(1):95. Published 2019 May 20. doi: (2019). 10.1186/s12916-019-1321-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.-Li, L. et al. Obesity is an independent risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: evidence from a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies. Obes. Rev. 17 (6), 510–519. 10.1111/obr.12407 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.- Anderson, E. L. et al. Weight trajectories through infancy and childhood and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescence: the ALSPAC study. J. Hepatol. 61 (3), 626–632. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.018 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.- Blackburn, E. H. Telomere states and cell fates. Nature 408 (6808), 53–56. 10.1038/35040500 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.- Rossiello, F., Jurk, D. & Passos, J. F. d’Adda Di Fagagna F. Telomere dysfunction in ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Cell. Biol. 24 (2), 135–147. 10.1038/s41556-022-00842-x (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.- Satyanarayana, A. et al. Telomere shortening impairs organ regeneration by inhibiting cell cycle re-entry of a subpopulation of cells. EMBO J. 22 (15), 4003–4013. 10.1093/emboj/cdg367 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.- Calado, R. T. et al. A spectrum of severe familial liver disorders associate with telomerase mutations. PLoS ONE 4 (11), e7926. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007926 (2009). Published 2009 Nov 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.- Rudolph, K. L., Chang, S., Millard, M., Schreiber-Agus, N. & DePinho, R. A. Inhibition of experimental liver cirrhosis in mice by telomerase gene delivery. Science 287 (5456), 1253–1258. 10.1126/science.287.5456.1253 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Donati, B. & Valenti, L. Telomeres, NAFLD and Chronic liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (3), 383. 10.3390/ijms17030383 (2016). Published 2016 Mar 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.- Valdes, A. M. et al. Obesity, cigarette smoking, and telomere length in women. Lancet 366 (9486), 662–664. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66630-5 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.- Furukawa, S. et al. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 114 (12), 1752–1761. 10.1172/JCI21625 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.-Collins, K. & Mitchell, J. R. Telomerase in the human organism. Oncogene 21 (4), 564–579. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205083 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.-Tzanetakou, I. P., Katsilambros, N. L., Benetos, A., Mikhailidis, D. P. & Perrea, D. N. Is obesity linked to aging? Adipose tissue and the role of telomeres. Ageing Res. Rev. 11 (2), 220–229. 10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.003 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.-Lewis, K. A. & Tollefsbol, T. O. Regulation of the Telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit through epigenetic mechanisms. Front. Genet. 7 , 83. 10.3389/fgene.2016.00083 (2016). Published 2016 May 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.- Wang, L. et al. Association of a functional tandem repeats in the downstream of human telomerase gene and lung cancer. Oncogene 22 (46), 7123–7129. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206852 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.-Anwar, I. et al. Analysis of MNS16A VNTR polymorphic sequence variations of the TERT gene and associated risk for development of bladder cancer. Curr. Urol. 15 (4), 225–230. 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000040 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.- Yuan, H. et al. MNS16A polymorphism of the TERT gene on cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 42 (12), 1004–1018. 10.1080/15257770.2023.2226691 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.-Wang, X. et al. Distinct roles of telomerase activity in age-related chronic diseases: an update literature review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 167, 115553. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115553 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.-Dasarathy, S. et al. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J. Hepatol. 51 (6), 1061–1067. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.001 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.-Neyzi, O. et al. Reference values for weight, height, head circumference, and body mass Index in Turkish children. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 7 (4), 280–293. 10.4274/jcrpe.2183 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.- Flynn, J. T. et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents [published correction appears in Pediatrics. ;140(6):e20173035. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3035] [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20181739. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1739]. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20171904. doi: (2017). 10.1542/peds.2017-1904
- 25.Albosale, A. H. & Mashkina, E. V. Association of relative Telomere length and risk of high human papillomavirus load in cervical epithelial cells. Balkan J. Med. Genet. 24 (2), 65–70. 10.2478/bjmg-2021-0026 (2022). Published 2022 Jun 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hashemi, M. et al. Association between hTERT polymorphisms and the risk of breast cancer in a sample of Southeast Iranian population. BMC Res. Notes. 7, 895. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-895 (2014). Published 2014 Dec 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.-Mundstock, E. et al. Effect of obesity on telomere length: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. (Silver Spring) 23 (11), 2165–2174. 10.1002/oby.21183 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.-Wang, Q., Zhan, Y., Pedersen, N. L., Fang, F. & Hägg, S. Telomere length and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 48 , 11–20. 10.1016/j.arr.2018.09.002 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Raftopoulou, C., Paltoglou, G. & Charmandari, E. Association between telomere length and pediatric obesity: a systematic review. Nutrients 14 (6), 1244. 10.3390/nu14061244 (2022). Published 2022 Mar 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.-Tang, L. et al. The association between telomere length and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study. BMC Med. 21 (1), 427. 10.1186/s12916-023-03136-7 (2023). Published 2023 Nov 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.-Khosravaniardakani, S. et al. Obesity accelerates leukocyte telomere length shortening in apparently healthy adults: A meta-analysis [retracted in: Front Nutr. ;11:1390502. doi: (2024). 10.3389/fnut.2024.1390502]. Front Nutr. 2022;9:812846. Published 2022 May 26. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.812846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
- 32.-Ooi, D. S. Q. et al. Association of leukocyte telomere length with obesity-related traits in Asian children with early-onset obesity. Pediatr. Obes. 16 (8), e12771. 10.1111/ijpo.12771 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wojcicki, J. M., Gill, R. M., Wilson, L., Lin, J. & Rosenthal, P. Shorter leukocyte telomere length protects against NAFLD progression in children. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 5446. 10.1038/s41598-023-31149-y (2023). Published 2023 Apr 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.-Shin, H. K. et al. Association between telomere length and hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. ;11(1):18004. Published 2021 Sep 9. doi: (2021). 10.1038/s41598-021-97385-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.-Martens, D. S. et al. Association of newborn telomere length with blood pressure in childhood. JAMA Netw. Open. 5 (8), e2225521. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25521 (2022). Published 2022 Aug 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.-Al-Attas, O. S. et al. Telomere length in relation to insulin resistance, inflammation and obesity among arab youth. Acta Paediatr. 99 (6), 896–899. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01720.x (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.-Tellechea, M. L. & Pirola, C. J. The impact of hypertension on leukocyte telomere length: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies. J. Hum. Hypertens. 31 (2), 99–105. 10.1038/jhh.2016.45 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.-Huang, Y. Q. et al. The relationship between mean telomere length and blood pressure: results from the national health and nutrition examination surveys. Ann. Transl Med. 8 (8), 535. 10.21037/atm.2020.03.205 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.-Scarabino, D., Peconi, M., Pelliccia, F. & Corbo, R. M. Analysis of the association between TERC and TERT Genetic variation and leukocyte telomere length and human Lifespan-A follow-Up study. Genes (Basel). ;10(2):82. Published 2019 Jan 25. doi: (2019). 10.3390/genes10020082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.-Essa, E. S. & Alagizy, H. A. Association of MNS16A VNTR and hTERT rs2736098: G > A polymorphisms with susceptibility to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Tumori 104 (3), 165–171. 10.5301/tj.5000653 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.-Huda, N., Yasmin, T. & Nabi, A. H. M. N. MNS16A VNTR polymorphism of human telomerase gene: elucidation of a gender specific potential allele associated with type 2 diabetes in Bangladeshi population. J. Diabetes Complications 35 (10), 108018. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108018 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.-Concetti, F. et al. The functional VNTR MNS16A of the TERT gene is associated with human longevity in a population of Central Italy. Exp. Gerontol. 48 (6), 587–592. 10.1016/j.exger.2013.03.009 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.-Wysoczanska, B. et al. Variability within the human TERT gene, telomere length and predisposition to chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Onco Targets Ther. 12, 4309–4320. 10.2147/OTT.S198313 (2019). Published 2019 May 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.-Wysoczanska, B., Wrobel, T., Dobrzynska, O., Mazur, G. & Bogunia-Kubik, K. Role of the functional MNS16A VNTR-243 variant of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene in progression and response to therapy of patients with Non-hodgkin’s B-cell lymphomas. Int. J. Immunogenet. 42 (2), 100–105. 10.1111/iji.12182 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.- Vos, M. B. et al. NASPGHAN clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: recommendations from the expert committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the north American society of pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition (NASPGHAN). J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 64, 319–334 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.- Vajro, P. et al. Diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: position paper of the ESPGHAN hepatology committee. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 54, 700–713 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


