Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2024 Oct 10;11(10):ofae614. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae614

Central Skull Base Osteomyelitis in Queensland, Australia, 2010–2020

Matthew B Eustace 1,2,, Maxwell Braddick 3, Kylie Alcorn 4, Keat Choong 5, Ferris Satyaputra 6, David Siebert 7, Simon Smith 8, Ryan Sommerville 9, Kate McCarthy 10,11
PMCID: PMC11500440  PMID: 39450399

Abstract

Background

Central skull base osteomyelitis (CSBO) is an incompletely defined, life-threatening infection of the bones of the cranial vault. We describe the clinical features and outcomes of CSBO in Queensland, Australia, over an 11-year period.

Methods

Medical record coding enquiries identified cases of CSBO across 6 tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia, from January 2010 to December 2020. Epidemiological, demographic, diagnostic, management, and outcome data were collected from each identified case.

Results

Twenty-two cases of CSBO were identified within the study period; the median age was 73 years with a male predominance (73%). High rates of comorbid disease were detected, with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5. Diabetes mellitus was the most frequently observed condition. Six cases had bone sampling for microbiological diagnosis while the remainder had superficial sampling of contiguous structures. The most common pathogen isolated was Pseudomonas aeruginosa followed by Staphylococcus aureus, with only 1 case of fungal infection. This series demonstrated a mortality rate of 31.8%, with 45.5% of cases left with long-term sequelae including persistent pain and cranial nerve deficits.

Conclusions

Four key observations emerged in this series: (1) advanced age and diabetes mellitus are common risk factors for CSBO, (2) limited surgical intervention occurred, (3) microbiological diagnoses relied primarily on superficial sampling, and (4) significant mortality and morbidity was observed. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the optimal approach to the diagnosis and management of CSBO and to improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Australia, bacterial infection, fungal infection, osteomyelitis, skull base


Our case series observed significant mortality and morbidity in cases of central skull base osteomyelitis despite prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Advanced age and diabetes were the most common risk factors. In our jurisdiction, limited surgical intervention for source control occurred and microbiological diagnoses relied on superficial sampling of contiguous, nonsterile sites rather than bone.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

This graphical abstract is also available at Tidbit: https://tidbitapp.io/tidbits/central-skull-base-osteomyelitis-in-queensland-australia-2010-2020


Skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) is a rare, severe, and life-threatening disease that involves infection of the bones of the skull base [1]. Osteomyelitis of the temporal bone secondary to contiguous spread of infection from severe external ear infection, so-called malignant otitis externa (MOE), is a well-recognized entity [2, 3]. In contrast, osteomyelitis primarily involving the clivus, occipital, and sphenoid bones (Figure 1)—described as atypical or central skull base osteomyelitis (CSBO)—is rare and less uniformly defined [4, 5]. CSBO has been described by some authors as SBO involving the central skull base irrespective of source, including as an extension of MOE [1]. Conversely, CSBO has also been defined as SBO involving the clivus, central sphenoid, and occipital bones in the absence of preceding otogenic infection [6]. These cases are often attributed to contiguous spread of sinus, paranasal, and perioral infection [1, 3, 5]. Additionally, individual case reports of CSBO reveal potentially more diverse underlying microbiology compared to typical SBO [5, 7].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Anatomy of skull base osteomyelitis and its variants. Image adapted from Khan et al [1], “A comprehensive review of skull base osteomyelitis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges among various presentations,” Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, 2018; 13:959–70. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Abbreviation: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

People with CSBO usually present with features of chronic infection of contiguous structures including the ear, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, and oral cavity. Clinical features vary but may include otalgia, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, oral cavity pain, and headache without improvement despite appropriate loco-regional treatment with procedural intervention, antimicrobials, and anti-inflammatories [4]. As the infection progresses, significant intracranial sequelae may develop including cranial nerve palsies (due to contiguous spread of infection to neural foramina), meningitis, epidural abscess, subdural empyema, brain abscess, and vascular complications (hemorrhage and/or thrombosis) [6, 8, 9]. Without treatment, these intracranial complications invariably lead to significant disability and death.

The diagnosis of CSBO is challenging; clinical history, examination, and laboratory investigations are often variable and nonspecific, with medical imaging essential in establishing the diagnosis [10]. Computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common modalities used to support the diagnosis of CSBO and to follow progress and response to treatment [3, 11]. Historically, nuclear medicine studies such as gallium-labeled white blood cell scans and technetium-labeled bone scans were utilized for the diagnosis of CSBO. However, with the advent of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET), these older nuclear medicine modalities have largely been superseded [12]. PET demonstrates excellent sensitivity and greater specificity for the diagnosis of CSBO when compared to MRI and can be a useful adjunct to diagnosis [13].

The microbiological basis of CSBO differs from typical SBO. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative pathogen, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and atypical mycobacteria [14]. CSBO is also more likely to be caused by invasive molds and other fungal pathogens [15, 16]. Due to the rarity of CSBO, the condition remains incompletely defined, with few studies to date and, to our knowledge, none published in the Australian context. Queensland is the northeasternmost state of Australia and spans >7000 km of coastline with a tropical far north region and subtropical southeast region. The state is serviced by a network of public hospitals administered by geographic hospital and health services that receive joint state and federal funding.

This study aimed to describe the clinical features, epidemiology, and outcomes of CSBO in Queensland, Australia, to better understand this rare and life-threatening disease in the Australian context.

METHODS

A retrospective observational descriptive study of CSBO was undertaken across 6 tertiary hospitals throughout Queensland, Australia, over a 11-year period (1 January 2010–31 December 2020). Cases of CSBO were identified through medical record interrogation via the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification definitions [17]. The codes searched included petrositis (H70.2), acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the skull (M86.08), other acute osteomyelitis of the skull (M86.18), subacute osteomyelitis of the skull (M86.28), chronic multifocal osteomyelitis of the skull (M86.38), chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus (M86.48), and other chronic hematogenous osteomyelitis of the skull (M86.58) [17].

The medical records of each identified case were reviewed and patients >16 years of age, with medical imaging demonstrating osteomyelitis with bony involvement of 1 or more of clivus, central sphenoid, and central occipital bone, were included. Cases were excluded if an alternative diagnosis accounted for their clinical presentation and imaging findings (eg, base of skull malignancy). Epidemiological data at presentation were collected including patient demographics, comorbidities, presence of predisposing factors (including diabetes, smoking status, and use of injecting drugs), clinical symptoms and signs, presence of cranial nerve palsy, and presumed source of infection (otogenic, paranasal, sinus, hematogenous, other). Investigation data during initial workup, including radiological reports, inflammatory markers, and results of microbiological and histopathological investigations, were also recorded. Finally, data on management and outcomes, including surgical intervention, antimicrobial choice and duration, survival at 12 months, and complications attributable to CSBO, were recorded.

Patient Consent

The study was approved by the Metro North Health Human Research Ethics Committee A (EC00172) as a low-risk research activity, with the requirement for informed consent waived. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

RESULTS

We identified 22 cases of CSBO (Supplementary Figure 1) across the 6 participating tertiary centers.

Demographics and Clinical Presentation

Most cases occurred in men (77.2%) with a median patient age at diagnosis of 73 years (range, 37–96 years) (Table 1). The most common risk factor observed was diabetes mellitus (16/22 [72.7%]) followed by smoking (10/22 [45.5%]), with only a single case, respectively, with a history of injecting drug use or corticosteroid use. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2). Frequent presenting symptoms observed included otalgia (7/22 [31.8%]) and headache (7/22 [31.8%]), consistent with the most frequently observed route of infection being otogenic (16/22 [72.7%]). Eight cases had evidence of cranial nerve palsy at presentation, with facial nerve palsy (seventh cranial nerve) seen in 6 of these.

Table 1.

Demographics and Presenting Features

Case Gender Age, y CCI Score Risk Factors Presenting Symptoms Cranial Nerve Palsy Route of Infection
1 F 77 5 T2DM, smoking Nasal discharge Sinus
2 M 73 3 Facial pain, otalgia, hearing loss V3 Paranasal
3 M 89 11 T2DM Otalgia, vertigo Otogenic
4 M 73 5 T2DM Headache, dysarthria Otogenic
5 M 55 4 T2DM Otalgia, tinnitus, hearing loss Otogenic
6 F 62 6 T2DM Headache, otalgia, nausea, weight loss Otogenic
7 M 37 0 Smoking Headache, neck pain, otalgia, vertigo Otogenic
8 M 95 8 Smoking Dysphagia, dysphonia VII Otogenic
9 M 74 4 T1DM, smoking Headache Otogenic
10 M 70 6 T2DM Headache, fever, weight loss Otogenic
11 M 79 6 Smoking Facial pain VII Otogenic
12 M 87 5 Smoking Delirium Otogenic
13 M 69 3 T2DM Diplopia II, VI Paranasal
14 M 50 2 T2DM, smoking Headache Otogenic
15 M 84 7 T2DM, smoking Hearing loss VII Otogenic
16 M 79 4 T2DM, IDU Neck pain Hematogenous
17 M 53 1 Smoking Fever, otorrhea, delirium Otogenic
18 M 85 5 T2DM Facial pain Sinus
19 F 66 4 T2DM Facial pain, otorrhea VII Otogenic
20 F 70 5 T1DM, steroid use Dysphonia, otorrhea, hearing loss VII, VIII, IX, X Otogenic
21 F 96 8 T2DM Headache, facial pain, otalgia Otogenic
22 M 72 9 T2DM, smoking Facial pain, otalgia VII Otogenic

Abbreviations: CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; F, female; IDU, injecting drug use; M, male; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Laboratory and Radiological Investigations

Laboratory investigations demonstrated a median C-reactive protein of 66 mg/L (IQR, 67 mg/L), erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 65 mm/hour (IQR, 67 mm/hour), and white cell count of 11.6 × 109/L (IQR, 6.85 × 109/L) (Table 2). Thirteen cases had biopsy and histological examination. Features of chronic inflammation and osteomyelitis were observed most frequently. MRI was undertaken in all cases with CT and nuclear medicine studies ordered in 15 and 4 cases, respectively (Figure 2). Bone sampling occurred in 6 cases. The most common microbiological diagnosis was P aeruginosa (31.8%), followed by Staphylococcus sp (27.3%), with similar findings observed across tropical and subtropical Queensland. Only 1 case of definite fungal CSBO was observed, with Aspergillus flavus isolated in a patient residing in tropical North Queensland.

Table 2.

Laboratory and Radiological Investigations

Case Peak ESR Peak CRP Peak WCC Imaging Bones Involved Biopsy Type Histology Sample Type Microbiology
1 53 26 17 MRI, CT Temporal, occipital, clivus Blood culture Staphylococcus aureus
2 24 2 10 MRI, NM Temporal, clivus Endoscopic sphenoidectomy Acute and chronic inflammation with necrosis in fibrous tissue and bone Middle ear fluid Eikenella corrodens
3 843 9 MRI, CT Temporal, occipital, clivus Open biopsy Nasal lymphoid hyperplasia Nasal tissue Streptococcus agalactiae, MSF
4 29 7 MRI, CT, NM Temporal, occipital, frontal, clivus Open biopsy Acute on chronic inflammation and granulation tissue Postnasal swab Staphylococcus aureus
5 20 2 14 MRI, CT, NM Temporal, clivus Ear swab Pseudomonas aeruginosa
6 100 35 12 MRI Temporal, clivus Ear swab Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7 34 198 20 MRI, CT Temporal, clivus Blood culture, CSF Streptococcus intermedius
8 236 15 MRI, CT Temporal, clivus Ear swab Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MSF
9 133 174 20 MRI Clivus CT guided Chronic inflammation of postnasal space Postnasal tissue Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus
10 65 48 14 MRI Temporal, clivus Endoscopic sphenoidectomy Mild chronic inflammation Ear fluid Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Staphylococcus epidermidis
11 75 78 10 MRI Temporal, occipital Open biopsy Bone, connective tissue, and inflammation Ear tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa
12 75 67 9 MRI Temporal, occipital Ear swab Culture negative
13 74 65 11 MRI, CT Clivus Orbital tissue Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus
14 94 176 26 MRI, CT Occipital, clivus Open biopsy Intense diffuse chronic
suppurative inflammation
Mastoid tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa
15 72 11 12 MRI Occipital, clivus Ear swab Culture negative
16 55 309 15 MRI, CT Clivus Blood culture Staphylococcus aureus
17 248 16 MRI, CT Occipital, clivus Endoscopic sphenoidectomy Chronic inflammation with osteonecrosis Ear swab Streptococcus pneumoniae
18 43 10 9 MRI, CT Clivus Endoscopic sphenoidectomy Mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with osteonecrosis, septate fungal hyphae seen Sinus tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
MSF
19 109 8 MRI, CT Temporal, occipital, clivus Open biopsy Normal-appearing mucosa Postnasal tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
MSF
20 106 98 21 MRI, CT Occipital Open biopsy Mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate Postnasal tissue Chryseobacterium indologenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
21 32 14 6 MRI, CT Clivus
22 121 17 9 MRI, CT, NM Temporal, clivus CT guided Chronic inflammation Mandibular tissue Aspergillus flavus

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein (mg/L); CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour); MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MSF, mixed skin flora; NM, nuclear medicine; WCC, white cell count (× 109/L).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Medical imaging demonstrating features of central skull base osteomyelitis from selected cases. A (case 1), Axial T1 gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image demonstrating marked enhancement of paranasal sinuses and right skull base involving clivus, sphenoid, and right petrous apex. B (case 9), Axial computed tomographic image demonstrating decortication of the clivus bilaterally along the lateral and anterior margins. C (case 4), Axial fused gallium-67 image showing increased gallium-67 tracer uptake extending posteriorly to the region of the clivus. D (case 3), Axial fused fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography image showing intense FDG uptake eroding the clivus. On the right, FDG uptake extends laterally, eroding the petrous part of the temporal bone and involving the foramens lacerum and jugular foramen.

Management and Outcomes

Surgical debridement to support source control occurred in 4 cases; approaches included mastoidectomy (2 cases), endoscopic sinus surgery, and endoscopic infratemporal biopsy and debridement (Table 3). In cases of bacterial CSBO, the median duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy was 42 days (IQR, 12 days) followed by a median duration of oral antimicrobial therapy of 42 days (IQR, 109.3 days). Seven cases during the study period died due to progressive CSBO, with 3 deaths occurring within 4 weeks of diagnosis. Only 1 case was observed to relapse following treatment completion during the study period, but survived following retreatment. Long-term sequelae of CSBO were observed in 10 cases, including persistent cranial nerve palsy, sensorineural hearing loss, and persistent facial pain.

Table 3.

Clinical Management and Outcomes

Case Surgical
Intervention
IV Antimicrobials
(Duration, d)
PO Antimicrobials
(Duration, d)
Relapse Survival Complications of Infection
1 Cefazolin (3)
Flucloxacillin (64)
Piperacillin-tazobactam (37)
Dicloxacillin (106)
Ciprofloxacin (120)
Clindamycin (120)
Y Y Right petrous ICA pseudoaneurysm, aspiration
2 FESS Piperacillin-tazobactam (52) Amoxicillin-clavulanate (52) N Y Otalgia, hearing loss
3 Piperacillin-tazobactam (32) Co-trimoxazole (28)
Ciprofloxacin (89)
N Y Nil
4 Flucloxacillin (42) Dicloxacillin (73) N Y Postauricular pain, hearing loss
5 Piperacillin-tazobactam (42) Ciprofloxacin (13) N Y Headaches
6 Piperacillin-tazobactam (42) Ciprofloxacin (42) N Y Tinnitus, hearing loss
7 Right modified radical mastoidectomy Vancomycin (5)
Piperacillin-tazobactam (5)
Benzylpenicillin (42)
Lincomycin (35)
Amoxicillin (181) N Y Subdural empyema, dural venous sinus thrombosis, IJV thrombosis
8 Piperacillin-tazobactam (13) N N Death
9 Left mastoidectomy Vancomycin (33) Rifampicin (58)
Fusidic acid (25)
N N Death
10 Endoscopic biopsy infratemporal fossa Teicoplanin (16)
Cefepime (9)
Tobramycin (5)
Meropenem (61)
N N Death
11 Cefepime (12)
Amikacin (29)
N N Death
12 Nil Ciprofloxacin (23) N N Death
13 Ticarcillin-clavulanate (14) Ciprofloxacin (55)
Voriconazole (69)
N Y Monocular blindness
14 Ceftolozane-tazobactam (75) N Y Nil
15 Piperacillin-tazobactam (45) Ciprofloxacin (9)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate (9)
N N Death
16 Flucloxacillin (42) Cephalexin (42) N Y Neck pain, headaches
17 Ceftriaxone (42) N Y Nil
18 Liposomal
amphotericin B (2)
Posaconazole (165) N Y Nil
19 Piperacillin-tazobactam (35) Ciprofloxacin (16) N Y Facial nerve palsy
20 Meropenem (10)
Vancomycin (10)
Piperacillin-tazobactam (42)
Posaconazole (10)
Ciprofloxacin (155)
Co-trimoxazole (168)
N Y Facial nerve palsy, hearing loss
21 Piperacillin-tazobactam (42) Amoxicillin-clavulanate (181)
Ciprofloxacin (181)
N Y Nil
22 Piperacillin-tazobactam (29)
Lincomycin (7)
Clindamycin (29)
Meropenem (15)
Cefepime (26)
Voriconazole (193)
Posaconazole (16)
Ciprofloxacin (162)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate (373)
N N Death

Abbreviations: FESS, functional endoscopic sinus surgery; ICA, internal carotid artery; IJV, internal jugular vein; IV, intravenous; N, no; PO, oral; Y, yes.

DISCUSSION

CSBO represents a severe, life-threatening infection with significant risk of morbidity and mortality despite appropriate antimicrobial treatment [6, 9]. This study highlights the challenges in diagnosis and management of CSBO and the detrimental outcomes of death and disability encountered in tropical and subtropical regions of Queensland, Australia. In this case series, 4 key observations emerged—advanced age and diabetes mellitus as risk factors for CSBO, reliance on superficial sampling for microbiological diagnosis, limited surgical intervention offered in this setting, and the significant mortality and morbidity associated with CSBO.

Similar to observational studies of typical SBO, in this series, the most frequently observed comorbidities were advanced age (>65 years) and diabetes mellitus [2]. MOE, a common precursor to SBO, is an infection strongly associated with diabetes, with up to 90% of cases found to have this condition [18]. In our study, patients with CSBO carried a significant burden of comorbidities, categorized as severe by the CCI metric with a median score of 5. Cases were seen in older adults (median age, 73 years) and were highly likely to have diabetes (16/22 [72.7%]); the mechanism for this association between diabetes, advanced age, and CSBO is incompletely understood. However, theories of innate and adaptive immune dysfunction and compromise to vascular supply have been proposed [19]. For example, adaptive immune system effector cell function is demonstrably reduced in diabetes. This is thought to be mediated through impaired antigen-presenting cell function leading to reduced activation of T-helper (Th) 1, Th2, and Th17 cells and thus increased vulnerability to infection, particularly of fungal etiology [20]. While in advanced age, reduced bone marrow hematopoietic potential manifests with reduced production of B cells (especially naive and switch memory B cells), increasing vulnerability to bacterial and viral infections [21]. These mechanisms could all plausibly contribute to the increased frequency of advanced age and diabetes observed in this series, with glycemic control measures offering an important potential adjunct to CSBO management.

Establishing an accurate microbiological diagnosis is crucial in selecting the optimal antimicrobial therapy and can influence the duration of therapy and necessity of surgical debridement (ie, establishing bacterial versus fungal infection) [16]. The microbiological diagnosis of CSBO in most cases in this series was based on superficial or deep sampling of adjacent structures, with only 6 cases obtaining bone samples. In CSBO the most common routes of infection are contiguous spread from nonsterile sites, namely otogenic, paranasal, sinus, and odontogenic [3]. Thus, the absence of representative sampling of involved bone risks isolating a colonizing organism or contaminant rather than the underlying pathogen(s). Within the limitations of this study, it is important to consider that many of the microbiological diagnoses may therefore not have been adequately representative. Thomas described their experience in Vellore, India, where they advocate for biopsy of involved bone to guide antimicrobial treatment in CSBO, particularly in cases with poor response to empiric therapy [22]. Their single center observed additional microbiological yield in deeper surgical samples with no significant complications reported from surgical intervention. This was exemplified in 1 case where an unrecognized fungal co-pathogen was identified via targeted bone biopsy, prompting the addition of antifungal therapy and ultimately resulting in clinical cure [22].

The role of surgery for CSBO is uncertain [6]. Within this series, only 4 cases had surgical intervention involving debridement to aid source control. A further 8 cases had surgical biopsy to aid microbiological diagnosis, though in most cases adjoining structures (ie, paranasal sinus) were sampled, rather than skull base. Mortazavi and colleagues suggest that early recognition and diagnosis of cranial osteomyelitis, followed by aggressive surgical debridement, is essential to achieving good clinical outcomes [7]. Furthermore, early surgical management has been observed to reduce some of the long-term sequelae of infection, that is, persistent facial nerve palsy [8]. Conversely, other centers have observed limited benefit with surgical management but significant procedural risk, routinely managing cases with antimicrobials alone [16, 23]. Compared to bacterial SBO, fungal SBO carries a poorer overall prognosis and consideration of aggressive debridement is strongly advised, especially in cases of zygomycosis [16].

We observed significant morbidity and mortality in this case series with a mortality rate of 31.8% within 12 months due to progressive CSBO. In some cases, acute management was complicated by vascular events (thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm), abscess formation, and aspiration (in the setting of lower cranial nerve deficits). Long-term sequelae were observed in 6 of the surviving cases (27.3%), who had persistent cranial nerve deficits with sensorineural hearing loss, facial nerve palsy, and monocular blindness observed, as well as persistent head and neck pain. The mortality rate observed in this series was greater than other series published in the last 2 decades [16, 24, 25]. We observed a comparatively lower rate of surgical intervention and invasive bone biopsy with many cases not achieving a definitive histological or microbiological diagnosis, limiting directed surgical and antimicrobial management. This may have contributed in part to the observed poor outcomes in this series.

To our knowledge, this is the first case series to report on the epidemiology, investigation, and clinical management of CSBO in Australia. Strengths of this study include the broad geographic area that cases were drawn from, the centralized laboratory information system used by public hospitals, comparison of histological and microbiological data, and the level of detail included around management and outcomes, including antimicrobial selection and duration. However, this study does have some limitations. First, this study was retrospective and observational, based on review of medical records only. Complex case management and multidisciplinary decision making, as are often required in cases of CSBO, may not have been adequately represented or may have been oversimplified. Second, CSBO case identification was based on clinical coding, and not all cases managed across the participating centers may have been captured. Finally, the number of cases over the study period was less than anticipated, resulting in a small sample and limiting the overall generalizability of any findings.

CSBO remains a rare and life-threatening infection. Multidisciplinary collaboration between ear, nose, and throat surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nuclear medicine physicians, and radiologists is paramount to establish an accurate diagnosis and formulate a comprehensive management plan. Significant questions remain over the best approach to confirm the microbiological etiology, the role of surgical debridement, and the optimal antimicrobial duration. Future prospective studies are needed to try and answer these vital questions to broaden understanding and improve clinical outcomes.

Supplementary Material

ofae614_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Matthew B Eustace, Royal Brisbane Clinical Unit, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Maxwell Braddick, Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Kylie Alcorn, Infectious Diseases Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Keat Choong, Infectious Diseases Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Kawana, Queensland, Australia.

Ferris Satyaputra, Infectious Diseases Unit, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.

David Siebert, Infection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Simon Smith, Infectious Diseases Unit, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.

Ryan Sommerville, Otolaryngology Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Kate McCarthy, Royal Brisbane Clinical Unit, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Note

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.

References

  • 1. Khan  MA, Quadri  SAQ, Kazmi  AS, et al.  A comprehensive review of skull base osteomyelitis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges among various presentations. Asian J Neurosurg  2018; 13:959–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Takahashi  T, Takahashi  K, Horii  A. Skull base osteomyelitis: a rare but life-threatening illness. Lancet Infect Dis  2022; 22:1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mejzlik  J, Cerny  M, Zeinerova  L, et al.  The routes of infection spread in central skull-base osteomyelitis and the diagnostic role of CT and MRI scans. BMC Med Imaging  2019; 19:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Muranjan  SN, Khadilkar  SV, Wagle  SC, Jaggi  ST. Central skull base osteomyelitis: diagnostic dilemmas and management issues. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg  2016; 68:149–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Clark  MPA, Pretorius  PM, Byren  I, Milford  CA. Central or atypical skull base osteomyelitis: diagnosis and treatment. Skull Base  2009; 19:247–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Urbančič  J, Vozel  D, Battelino  S, et al.  Atypical skull-base osteomyelitis: comprehensive review and multidisciplinary management viewpoints. Trop Med Infect Dis  2023; 8:254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mortazavi  MM, Khan  MA, Quadri  SA, et al.  Cranial osteomyelitis: a comprehensive review of modern therapies. World Neurosurg  2018; 111:142–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Freeman  MH, Perkins  EL, Tawfik  KO, et al.  Facial paralysis in skull base osteomyelitis—comparison of surgical and nonsurgical management. Laryngoscope  2023; 133:179–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fenberg  RB, Sylvester  MJ, Davidson  S, McKean  EL, VanKoevering  KK. Central skull base osteomyelitis: a case series from a tertiary care center over 5 years. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol  2023; 132:1300–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Singh  U, Venkitachalam  S, Chinnusamy  R. Clinical profiling and management outcome of atypical skull base osteomyelitis. Br J Neurosurg  2020; 34:686–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chapman  PR, Choudhary  G, Singhal  A. Skull base osteomyelitis: a comprehensive imaging review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol  2021; 42:404–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bhattacharjee  S, Ram  A, Varkey  BM. USE of PET CT scan for earlier diagnosis of central skull-base osteomyelitis—a step beyond conventional MRI scan. J Neurol Sci  2019; 405:79–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kulkarni  SC, Padma  S, Shanmuga Sundaram  P. In the evaluation of patients with skull base osteomyelitis, does 18F-FDG PET CT have a role?  Nucl Med Commun  2020; 41:550–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Johnson  AK, Batra  PS. Central skull base osteomyelitis: an emerging clinical entity. Laryngoscope  2014; 124:1083–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Di Lullo  AM, Russo  C, Grimaldi  G, et al.  Skull base fungal osteomyelitis: a case report and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J  2021; 100(10 Suppl):1089S–94S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Blyth  CC, Gomes  L, Sorrell  TC, da Cruz  M, Sud  A, Chen  SC. Skull-base osteomyelitis: fungal vs. bacterial infection. Clin Microbiol Infect  2011; 17:306–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. World Health Organization . ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th revision, 2010 ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Grandis  JR, Branstetter  BF, Yu  VL. The changing face of malignant (necrotising) external otitis: clinical, radiological, and anatomic correlations. Lancet Infect Dis  2004; 4:34–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Maramattom  B, Ram  S, Viswam  V, Nair  S. Central skull base osteomyelitis: multimodality imaging and clinical findings from a large Indian cohort. Neurol India  2022; 70:1911–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Holt  RIG, Cockram  CS, Ma  RCW, Luk  AOY. Diabetes and infection: review of the epidemiology, mechanisms and principles of treatment. Diabetologia  2024; 67:1168–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Quiros-Roldan  E, Sottini  A, Natali  PG, Imberti  L. The impact of immune system aging on infectious diseases. Microorganisms  2024; 12:775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Thomas  R. Targeted skull base biopsies in the management of central skull base osteomyelitis. Clin Otolaryngol  2021; 46:72–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Chen  C-N, Chen  Y-S, Yeh  T-H, Hsu  C-J, Tseng  F-Y. Outcomes of malignant external otitis: survival vs mortality. Acta Otolaryngol  2010; 130:89–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ridder  GJ, Breunig  C, Kaminsky  J, Pfeiffer  J. Central skull base osteomyelitis: new insights and implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol  2015; 272:1269–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lee  S, Hooper  R, Fuller  A, Turlakow  A, Cousins  V, Nouraei  R. Otogenic cranial base osteomyelitis: a proposed prognosis-based system for disease classification. Otol Neurotol  2008; 29:666–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ofae614_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES