Abstract
Interaction between light and magnetism in magneto-optical (MO) nanophotonic devices has been actively studied in the past few years. The recent development of MO all-dielectric resonators and metasurfaces has led to the emergence of various novel MO phenomena that were not observed in their bulk counterparts. For example, a large s-polarized transverse MO Kerr effect can be observed at magnetic resonance wavelength, which cannot exist in the bare MO films. We review recent developments in nanophotonic devices based on MO materials and focus on different modes and related MO effects in nanophotonic structures with emphasis on recently discovered new MO phenomena in magnetoplasmonics and all-dielectric nanostructures, such as dark mode, all-dielectric Mie resonance and waveguide mode. Further, we discuss the potential applications of these nanostructures for biological/chemical sensing, magnetic field sensing, and magnetic field-controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces.
Keywords: all-dielectric resonator, biosensor, chiromagnetic metasurface, magnetic field sensing, magneto-optical effects, magnetoplasmonics
Abbreviations
- PMOKE
polar magneto-optical Kerr effect
- TMOKE
transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect
- LMOKE
longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect
- BIG
bismuth iron garnet
- SPR
surface plasmon resonance
- LSPR
localized surface plasmon resonance
- PSPR
propagating surface plasmon resonance
- SLR
surface lattice resonance
- LMPIE
longitudinal magneto-photonic intensity effect
- FOM
figure of merit
- TMPIE
transverse magnetophotonic intensity effect
- EIT
electromagnetically induced transparency
- BIC
bound state in continuum
- LOD
limit of detection
- MOSPR
Magneto-optical surface plasmon resonance
1. Introduction
Faraday first studied the interaction between light and magnetism in 1845 [1] and Kerr studied it in magnetized materials in 1877, 1878 [2, 3]. They discovered polarization rotation for transmitted (Faraday effect) or reflected light (magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE)) when linearly polarized light was incident onto a magnetized medium, referred to as magneto-optical (MO) effects. For the Faraday effect, the polarization rotation angle was proportional to the optical path through the magnetized material. The rotation angle of light propagating along the magnetization direction is dependent only on the direction of the applied magnetic field [4, 5] and is independent of the light propagation direction because of its nonreciprocal nature. Thus, the Faraday effect has been widely utilized in nonreciprocal photonic devices such as optical isolators and circulators [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Most magnetic materials exhibit weak MO effects in the visible to the near-infrared frequency range [11], [12], [13], [14]. With the development of integrated and silicon photonics, research is dedicated to the integration of MO materials on waveguide nonreciprocal photonic devices [8, 15], [16], [17]. Further, MOKE found applications in optical data storage, which result in the development of MO discs in the 1980s. In addition, this effect is used for the development of waveguide nonreciprocal photonic devices that leads to phase and intensity nonreciprocity of linear polarized light in MO waveguides, i.e., nonreciprocal phase shift and nonreciprocal loss effects [10, 18], [19], [20], [21].
Given the development of nanophotonic devices, combining magnetic materials with subwavelength photonic nanostructures have become a promising field for enhancing MO effects, discovering novel MO effects, developing active metamaterials and metasurfaces, and enabling the efficient control of magnetism with light [22], [23], [24]. The MO effects and optomagnetism in plasmonic nanostructures comprising MO materials are studied in the field of magnetoplasmonics. A large enhancement of MO effects by the strong near-field localization of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) modes has been observed [23], [24], [25]. Magnetoplasmonic nanostructures based on pure ferromagnetic metals [26, 27], hybrid noble/ferromagnetic metals [28, 29] and hybrid noble metals/ferromagnetic dielectrics [30, 31] have been studied actively. A strongly enhanced Faraday effect [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], TMOKE [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], and LMOKE [41], [42], [43], [44], [45] have been demonstrated. New MO effects such as the longitudinal magneto-photonic intensity effect (LMPIE) have been experimentally observed [46, 47], and energy-efficient optomagnetic effects have been reported [48], [49], [50], [51], [52]. Further, magnetoplasmonic devices have been proposed for biosensing [53], magnetic field sensing [47], chiral molecule recognition [54], and magnetically tunable nonreciprocal metasurface [55] applications.
A major drawback of magnetoplasmonic devices, which is like other plasmonic devices, is the strong absorption of metals at optical frequencies; this limits the enhancement of the MO effect and results in undesired absorption loss. The recent emergence of optically resonant all-dielectric nanostructures fabricated using low-loss dielectric materials such as Si [56], TiO2 [57], and SiN [58] has led to the emergence of all dielectric MO metasurfaces. The first proposed all-dielectric MO nanophotonic device has a subwavelength all-dielectric grating comprising a dielectric MO material. Strong MO effects with high transmittance/reflectance are observed when high-quality factor waveguide modes are excited, and this has been demonstrated experimentally in different material systems [59], [60], [61], [62]. In addition, the violation of Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation has been theoretically proposed in grating-coupled MO waveguides [63, 64]. The research interest in discovering new MO effects is triggered by the unique Mie resonance modes in all dielectric resonators. The enhancement of MO effects and the MO figure of merit (FOM) has been demonstrated in hybrid or all-MO dielectric nanoresonators [65, 66]. Nonconventional MO effects such as s-polarized TMOKE have been recently observed [62, 66]. Meanwhile, the MO effects can be significantly enhanced owing to the high-Q resonance in all-dielectric resonators, which leads to the proposal of magnetically controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces [55].
We summarize recent research on nanophotonic devices based on MO materials. We focus on different modes in MO nanophotonic devices with an emphasis on the recent development of novel magneto-nanophotonic structures and the observation of new MO effects in both magnetoplasmonic and all-dielectric MO nanostructures. We discuss the recent development of magnetoplasmonic nanostructures, which features the observation of dark mode-induced strong MO effects, asymmetric/aperiodical plasmonic structures induced multiband MO effect enhancement, observation of optical gyromagnetism, and chiral magnetoplasmonic devices. Next, we move to the MO effects in dielectric nanophotonic devices, and they show that grating-coupled waveguide modes induced giant MO effects, infrared MO nanogratings violating Kirchhoff’s thermal radiation law, and Mie resonance modes induced nonconventional MO effects. Finally, we discuss the potential applications of these MO nanophotonic devices in chemical/biological sensing, magnetic field sensing, and magnetic field-controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces.
2. Summary of magneto-optical materials in this review
The MO materials appear in this review have been summarized in Figure 1. In general, the magnetic materials used in magneto-nanophotonic devices can be categorized into four groups, including magnetic metals, magnetic dielectrics, magnetic semiconductors and topological magnetic materials. Magnetic metals, such as Fe, Co, and Ni, are usually studied in magnetoplasmonic structures. They show strong MO effects, but also suffer from high absorption loss due to the metallic nature. Magnetic dielectrics, such as Ce:YIG, Bi:YIG, and EuS are studied in magnetoplasmonics and all dielectric resonators. They show high MO effects in the ultraviolet to infrared wavelength range, together with low absorption loss in the near infrared. Magnetic semiconductors, such as InAs, are studied in all dielectric nanostructures. They show strong MO effect in the near to far infrared wavelength range. Recently, topological magnetic materials, such as EuCd2As2, have attracted great research interest in MO nanostructures. They show particularly strong MO effect in the near infrared to terahertz wavelength range, making them promising candidates for nonreciprocal photonic device applications.
Figure 1:
The MO materials reported in this review.
3. Magnetoplasmonics
The enhancement of the MO effect and the change in plasmonic resonance modes under applied magnetic fields in plasmonic nanostructures are studied under magnetoplasmonics. Although such effects can be observed in nonmagnetic nanophotonic structures such as pure Au [67], [68], [69], [70] provided the applied magnetic field is sufficiently strong, most magnetoplasmonic devices study plasmonic resonances in hybrid material systems with magnetic and nonmagnetic materials. Another interesting phenomenon of magnetoplasmonics is the phase tuning by MO response, which are both demonstrated in nonperiodic and periodic magnetoplasmonic nanoantennas [71, 72]. In the past decade, extensive research on magnetoplasmonic devices has been reported in several excellent review papers [22], [23], [24], [25, 73], [74], [75], [76], [77]. Here, we briefly review only the different magnetoplasmonic structures from the optical mode point of view, and we focus on several recently developed aperiodical/asymmetric magnetoplasmonic devices that exhibit unique resonance modes and MO effects. For a more systematic review of magnetoplasmonic devices, we refer the reader to references [22, 23, 25, 74, 77].
Figure 2 shows several typical magnetoplasmonic nanostructures. From an optical mode point of view, magnetoplasmonic devices can be categorized as localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) modes (Figure 2(a)), which propagate SPR modes (Figure 2(b)), and hybrid resonance modes (Figure 2(c)). Nanostructures based on noble metal and ferromagnetic materials supporting LSPR have been widely studied both theoretically and experimentally [28, 29, 78], [79], [80]. Enhanced MO effects are observed owing to the electromagnetic field enhancement in the MO materials because of the LSPR resonance (pure MO contribution), and the decreased transmission/reflection of incident light (pure optical contribution) [23]. For example, the simultaneous enhancement of the MO activity and reduction of the optical absorption loss are demonstrated in a judiciously designed sandwich layer with Au, SiO2, and Co films by Banthi et al. [28] as shown in Figure 2(a). The propagating SPR (PSPR) modes have been studied to enhance the Faraday effect or MOKE [43, 81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86]. As shown in Figure 2(b), Maccaferri et al. proposed 2D magnetoplasmonic crystals composed of Fe20Ni80 periodic nanoholes, which enhance the MO longitudinal Kerr effect by exciting the grating-coupled SPR mode [44]. Hybrid modes, wherein LSPR or PSPR modes are hybridized with other modes in the nanostructure, such as waveguide modes or lattice modes, have also attracted significant research interest [31, 36], [37], [38], [39, 87], [88], [89]. Narrower resonance peaks are observed because of the reduced scattering or absorption loss by exciting these hybrid modes. This leads to a stronger MO effect enhancement. For example, as shown in Figure 2(c), Kataja et al. studied the hybrid mode of the LSPR and lattice modes in periodic Ni nanodisks, and this yielded a Fano-type surface lattice resonance (SLR) mode [87]. The polar MOKE of the structure was governed by the SLR mode, and this was related to the polarization of the incident light parallel to periodicity. In another example shown in Figure 2(d), Chin et al. studied the enhancement of the Faraday effect in an Au grating on bismuth iron garnet (BIG) thin film nanostructures. They observed an 8.9 times improvement in the Faraday rotation (FR) together with a relatively high transmission of 36% at a wavelength of 963 nm by exciting the hybrid SPR and waveguide modes [31].
Figure 2:
Resonance modes reported in magnetoplasmonics devices.
(a) LSPR modes: high MO activity and low optical losses in Au/Co/Au-SiO2 sandwich magnetoplasmonic nanodisks. (b) Propagating SPP modes: magnetoplasmonic crystals consist of Fe20Ni80 periodic nanoholes. (c) Hybrid modes: Ni periodic nanodisk arrays supporting Fano-type resonances induced by hybrid lattice mode and LSPR modes. (d) Hybrid modes: giant enhancement of the MO FR in Au/BIG hybrid magnetoplasmonic structures. Panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [28, 31, 44, 88].
Novel magnetoplasmonic nanostructures and resonance modes have been recently reported. Although these modes can be categorized in the modes in Figure 2, unique MO effects are observed because of the aperiodic/asymmetric structure or mode profiles. The dark mode, wherein the radiative damping is strongly suppressed because of the antisymmetric field distributions, can further increase the MO effects. Dark modes are studied for magnetoplasmonic devices. Frolov et al. used dark surface lattice modes (SLMs) in Au/Ni/Au one-dimensional magnetoplasmonic crystals to enhance the transverse MOKE (TMOKE). The TMOKE of dark SLMs is almost three times higher than that of bright SLMs [90]. In the same year, Lopez-Ortega et al. used low-radiative multipolar dark modes in magnetoplasmonic nanocavities to achieve a large enhancement of the MO-induced modulation of light polarization, and this presented one order of the magnitude enhancement of field intensity compared to the bare magnetoplasmonic nanoantennas [91]. Aperiodical and asymmetric plasmonic nanostructures have been proposed in several studies. These structures can enable modes that differ from single dipole resonances or guided modes, which enables unique MO effects. In 2018, Kalish et al. proposed the concept of magnetoplasmonic quasicrystals, where the plasmonic gratings are no longer periodic, and this is similar to a quasicrystal, as shown in Figure 3(a). This device features a unique multiband MO response [92]. In 2020, Borovkova et al. investigated magnetoplasmonic structures with broken spatial symmetry and discovered notable MO modulations of the transmitted light at normal incidence with in-plane magnetization, this is forbidden in conventional symmetric nanostructures, as shown in Figure 3(b) [93]. Recently, Yang et al. proposed a nanostructure comprising Au split-ring resonators on a Ce:YIG film, as shown in Figure 3(c) [94]. The LSPR modes excite the electric field orthogonal to the incident light polarization direction, which leads to unique s-polarized TMOKE, which is not observed in natural MO materials at optical frequencies. Further, the authors retrieved the effective permittivity and permeability tensors of the metamaterial, which showed the bi-gyrotropic nature of the magnetoplasmonic nanostructure.
Figure 3:
Recent developments of magnetoplasmonic devices with aperiodic/asymmetry structures.
(a) Magnetoplasmonic quasicrystals with multiband enhancement of the MO response. The right figure presents TMOKE spectrum for periodic (red curve) and quasiperiodic structures (black curve). (b) Magnetoplasmonic crystals with broken spatial and time symmetry. The middle and right figures show the transmittance and TMOKE spectra as a function of the wavelengths and incident angles. A large TMOKE is observed under normal incidence at the SPR wavelength. (c) Magnetoplasmonic nanostructures with asymmetric structure (splitting ring resonator, SRR). The middle figure displays the s-polarized TMOKE under 45° (red), 50° (orange) and 55° (yellow) incidence. The right figure presents the equivalent off-diagonal elements of the permeability tensor of metamaterials at near-infrared wavelengths. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [92], [93], [94].
An interesting research direction for chiral magnetoplasmonics has recently gained attention. A structure is called chiral when its mirror image cannot overlap with itself through translation and rotation operations; such chiral plasmonic nanostructures are interesting because they can enhance the circular dichroism (CD) signals of enantiomers, and it is important for chiral molecule sensing. Unlike natural chiral molecules with fixed chiroptical properties, the chirality of chiral plasmonic nanostructures can be modulated by an external stimulus such as temperature, strain, magnetic field, and light, which is useful for chiroptical sensing [95], [96], [97], [98], [99]. Chiral magnetoplasmonics perfectly fit this scenario and magnetic field tunable plasmonic nanostructures can achieve high modulation speeds and large modulation amplitudes. Driven by an applied magnetic field, they do not generate heat or local chemical reactions. In 2014, Armelles et al. proposed a chiral magnetoplasmonic structure of gammadion crosses comprising Au/Co multilayers. The author observed a large CD of up to 1.5° at an LSPR wavelength of 850 nm. Further, they demonstrated a modulation of the CD up to ±20 mdeg by an applied magnetic field of 2 kOe (Figure 4(a)) [99]. The same group proposed a nanostructure with chiral plasmonic oligomers and a separated Au/Co multilayer in the next year [100]. The mutual interaction strength between the MO and chiro-optical effects can be tuned by changing the thickness of the separating layer, this opens the door for the fabrication of magneto-chiral systems over a wide spectral range. In 2018, Zubritskaya et al. devised Au–Au–Ni trimer nanoantennas with magnetic and chiral properties. The structure showed the modulation amplitude of more than 100% for the magnetically tunable chiroptical response [101], as indicated in Figure 4(b). In 2020, Qin et al. proposed a chiral magnetoplasmonic metasurface based on MO oxide material (Ce1Y2Fe5O12) and Au periodic nanoholes [102], as indicated in Figure 4(c). The authors observed the continuous magnetic field modulation of the extrinsic chiroptical properties of the devices. The measured CD varied in a large amplitude range from −0.65° to +1.9°. Further, they demonstrated magnetic field tunable chiral images in a 2 mm × 2 mm large device fabricated by lithography and self-assembly. Jeong et al. proposed self-assembled chiral nanoparticles using magnetoplasmonic Ag@Fe3O4 core–shell nanoparticles in helical magnetic fields. The structure showed the dynamic switching of CD(±3°) by hB in millisecond time [54]. In 2021, Luong et al. proposed an Ag/Co composite chiral nanohole array with in-plane symmetry breaking [103], as shown in Figure 4(d). The maximum modulation of the CD by an applied magnetic field can reach 0.35°. Recently, Petrucci et al. proposed a magneto-chiroptical metasurfaces consist of spiral arranged one Ni and four Ag nanodisks [104]. Due to strong interaction between magnetic (Ni) and plasmonic (Ag) nanodisks, large non-reciprocal and reciprocal CD were demonstrated. A chiral structure shows broken spatial reversal symmetry (parity), whereas a magnetic material shows broken time reversal symmetry (time). Although they both manifest themselves by optical CD in the far field, only structural chirality leads to near-field optical chirality in plasmonic nanostructures [102]. This difference makes such systems interesting in physics, and they are also attractive for sensing applications that allow more degrees of freedom to control the near-field and far-field chiroptical properties independently.
Figure 4:
Chiral magnetoplasmonic devices.
(a) Chiral magnetoplasmonic metasurface based on Au/Co multilayers shaped with gammadion crosses. A large CD (1.5 deg) presented in the gammadion crosses with magnetic tunable CD up to ±20 mdeg. (b) Chiral magnetoplasmonic metasurface based on Au–Au–Ni trimers. The circular differential transmission shows large variation under positive, negative, and zero applied magnetic fields. (c) Chiral magnetoplasmonic metasurface based on Au periodic nanohole/Ce:YIG/YIG/SiO2/TiN multilayers. Chiral imaging modulated by the magnetic field. (d) Chiral magnetoplasmonic metasurface based Ag/Co chiral nanohole arrays with in-plane symmetry breaking. A large magnetic field tunable circular differential transmission is demonstrated in this magnetoplasmonic chiral structure. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [99, 101], [102], [103].
4. All-dielectric MO nanostructures
4.1. All-dielectric MO subwavelength gratings
In contrast to magnetoplasmonic devices, MO nanophotonic structures comprising all-dielectric materials do not exhibit absorption issues caused by noble and ferromagnetic metals. Therefore, a considerably higher quality factor for the resonance modes can be achieved. This research direction has recently attracted significant interest.
All-dielectric MO subwavelength gratings supporting high-Q guided modes were first proposed theoretically [57, 105, 106]. In 2006, Bai et al. designed an all-dielectric MO grating based on a high-index Bi:YIG material, which achieves 90° Kerr rotation when exciting the grating-coupled guided-mode resonance [107]. Here, the author assumed lossless Bi:YIG materials. Therefore, the gigantic Kerr angles can only take place in calculations. In 2014, Marsymov et al. theoretically demonstrated a large enhancement of TMOKE in all-dielectric gratings composed of Bi:YIG/Si periodic nanostripes when the guided modes were coupled with Wood’s anomaly [59]. Due to the high index of Si, the gratings can achieve high reflectivity (96%) at the maximum of the TMOKE response wavelength. Subsequently, Gamet et al. proposed a similar all-dielectric grating in 2017, and this theoretically demonstrated the enhancement of MO effects in Faraday, PMOKE, LMOKE, and TMOKE configurations [108]. The MO material was a silica matrix doped with cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles, and the nonmagnetic dielectric was Si3N4. This group fabricated the device in 2020 and experimentally observed a fivefold enhancement of the FR for the TE/TM phase-matching scenario, as shown in Figure 5(a) [105]. Although a 0.49° FR angle was achieved, the low level of transmittance was the main drawback. In 2020, Bsawmall et al. fabricated a dielectric grating (photoresist) on top of an MO layer (tetraethyl orthosilicate doped with cobalt ferrite nanoparticles) and experimentally demonstrated a significant enhancement of the LMOKE up to 1.1° at a wavelength of 1506 nm [61]. In the same year, Voronov et al. experimentally demonstrated three orders of magnitude higher TMOKE in all-dielectric BIG subwavelength gratings compared to the unpatterned BIG film, partly resulted from the particularly small MO effect of the unpatterned BIG film (Figure 5(b)) [106]. The structure can support the propagation of TM-guided modes with a high quality factor Q = λ/∆λ = 138, which is an order of magnitude higher than plasmonic resonant structures. A high transmittance of T = 60% and a large TMOKE reaching 1% were simultaneously demonstrated. Later, authors proposed a two-dimensional (2D) all-dielectric BIG MO grating and observed MO light intensity modulation in the transmission for both s-and p-polarized incident light when exciting the TE-and TM-guided modes, i.e., the transverse magnetophotonic intensity effect (TMPIE), which is absent in smooth magnetic thin films, as shown in Figure 5(c) [62]. For the TE mode, the measured intensity modulation by magnetization can reach δ = 0.3%, together with a high transmittance of T = 55%. Research on hybrid-mode-enhanced MO effects starts to emerge in all-dielectric nanostructures. Recently, hybrid modes between localized (Fabry–Perot like) and lattice (guided-like) modes have been observed in a 2D iron-garnet nanocylinder array by Belotelov et al. The excitation of this mode leads to a three times enhancement of the FR and an order of magnitude enhancement of the TMOKE compared to the magnetic film with equal thickness [109].
Figure 5:
Waveguide modes in all-dielectric MO subwavelength gratings.
(a) SiN/CoFe2O4 nanoparticle doped SiO2 grating and the enhanced Faraday effect. The right figure presents the transmission and FR spectra, showing large FR enhancement at the Mie resonance wavelength. (b) Structure, transmittance, and TMOKE in BIG 1D subwavelength grating structures on gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrates. (c) Structure and TMPIE for both s and p polarized incidences of 2D BIG subwavelength gratings on GGG substrates. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [62, 105, 106].
Extending the concept of all-dielectric MO gratings to the mid-infrared wavelength range leads to another fascinating research direction for nonreciprocal thermal emission. An MO thermal emitter can violate Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation; however, subwavelength grating structures can boost this effect because of the enhanced MO effect. Such systems are attractive for energy harvesting because they only absorb energy from but without re-emission from the thermal radiation source. In 2014, Zhu et al. theoretically proposed a structure composed of InAs gratings on an Al substrate, and this can result in near-complete violation (i.e., difference between emissivity and absorptivity at a given frequency and direction can reach near unity) of Kirchhoff’s law under an applied magnetic field of 3 T, as indicated in Figure 6(a) [110]. In order to reduce the applied magnetic field, Zhao et al. theoretically proposed an all-dielectric MO grating structure with SiC periodic gratings on InAs films, as shown in Figure 6(b). A near-complete violation of Kirchhoff’s law can be achieved under only 0.3 T applied magnetic field by exciting the grating-coupled guided modes in this device [63]. However, in their calculation, the electron mobility of the InAs material reaches ∼3 × 105 cm2/(Vs), which is difficult to fabricate in experiments. Recently, Park et al. proposed a semitransparent 1D grating structure to violate Kirchhoff’s law in the transmission. The structure can achieve a significant contrast between absorptivity and emissivity by exciting the guided-mode resonance, as shown in Figure 6(c) [64]. Magnetic Weyl semimetals have been proposed in grating structures to solve the large applied magnetic field problem [111, 112]. Materials such as EuCd2As2 are proposed as promising candidates for realizing a nonreciprocal thermal emitter with no applied magnetic field [113]. An experimental demonstration of these proposals is an exciting research direction for future work.
Figure 6:
Violation of Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation in all-dielectric MO subwavelength gratings.
(a) Structure, absorption, and emission spectra of InAs gratings on an Al substrate under 3 T applied magnetic field. The emission and absorption spectra present different peak positions under the applied magnetic field. (b) Structure, absorption, and emission spectrum of SiC grating on InAs film on an Al substrate under 0.3 T applied magnetic field. The emission and absorption peaks separate under the applied magnetic field. (c) All-dielectric MO grating for violation of the Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation in the transmission mode. Large transmission difference of absorption and emission is observed under an applied magnetic field. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [63, 64, 110].
4.2. Mie resonance modes in all-dielectric MO resonators
Mie resonance modes can occur in both metallic and dielectric nanoparticles when their sizes are comparable to the incident light wavelength. Recent research interest has been focused on Mie resonance modes in dielectric nanoresonators because of their lower loss and more complex modes, which includes magnetic resonance modes compared to metallic nanoparticles. All-dielectric MO resonators supporting Mie resonance modes have been studied recently. In 2016, de Sousa et al. first calculated the MO activity in high-index dielectric silicon nanoparticles with an MO core, as indicated in Figure 7(a) [65]. This work demonstrates that the MO response is fully governed by magnetic dipolar and quadrupolar resonances. The electric resonance modes showed very little effect on the MO activity because of the lower field intensity in the MO core material, and this was different from the plasmonic resonances. The first experiment was conducted by Barsukova et al. who utilized a hybrid nanostructure comprising periodically arranged amorphous Si (α-Si) nanodisks and nickel thin magnetic film (Figure 7(b)) [114]. The MO response of the hybrid nanostructure can achieve an obvious enhancement near the magnetic dipole resonance of nanodisks compared with the bare 5 nm-thick nickel films. The same structure was numerically simulated by Musorin et al., who demonstrated a significant enhancement of the MO response when the electric and magnetic dipolar resonances were overlapped spectrally [115]. In 2019, a similar device composed of hydrogenated α-Si nanodisks covered with a 5 nm-thick nickel film was experimentally demonstrated to achieve the multifold enhancement of the Faraday effect in the spectral vicinity of the magnetic dipole resonance [116]. A characteristic value of the FR angle observed in this structure is θ = 0.8°. Limited by the large optical absorption of the nickel films, the transmittance of the all-dielectric resonator was low. Although these all-dielectric nanostructures are shown to boost MO effects with linearly polarized incident light, Abendroth et al. demonstrated enhanced magnetic CD by Mie resonance structures comprising amorphous Si nanodisks on Ta 3/Pt 3/[Pt 0.7/Co 0.6]N/Pt 3.7/Ta 3 (in nm) multilayer films (Figure 7(c)). These films demonstrate magnetic field-induced dissymmetry over ±2% for circularly polarized incident light [117]. In contrast to the unpatterned background that exhibits a modest wavelength-dependent dissymmetry, the patterned structure showed a six-fold enhancement of local electric field rotation within the proximal ferromagnetic films for circularly polarized light excitation, which highlights the influence of Mie resonances in the structure on the MO response. To improve the transmittance, Christofi et al. utilized the BIG nanodisk arrays to numerically demonstrated a large FR enhancement and high transmittance attributed to electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT), as shown in Figure 7(d) [118]. They theoretically demonstrated the enhancement of both the FR and MO FOM by carefully engineering the electric and magnetic dipolar resonance modes to overlap. Recently, Xia et al. theoretically proposed and experimentally fabricated a structure composed of periodically arranged Si nanodisks MO oxide Ce:YIG films (Figure 7(e)) [66]. They observed anomalous MO effects, which includes giant s-polarized TMOKE (δ = 6.4%) and two orders of magnitude higher LMOKE under near-normal incidence conditions compared to a bare Ce:YIG film. These anomalous MO effects are attributed to the unique circular displacement current when exciting the magnetic Mie resonance modes, this locally changes the electric field direction in the structure. In 2021, Kiel. et al. optimized the MO response of an all-dielectric Huygens metasurface comprising MO nanodisks of cerium-doped BIG using a Bayesian optimization algorithm (Figure 7(f)) [119]. The optimal structure showed 100% transmittance and a 15° FR angle, and this demonstrated the promising potential of all-dielectric MO Mie resonators for free-space nonreciprocal photonic device applications.
Figure 7:
All-dielectric MO resonators with Mie resonances.
(a) All-dielectric MO structure composed of Si spherical with a dielectric MO material core. The right figure presents the polarization rotation for different magnetic core radii: 230 nm, 184 nm, 115 nm and 46 nm. (b) All-dielectric MO structure based on the array of α-Si nanodisks covered by a 5 nm-thick nickel film. The right figure presents the experimental transmission (black, solid) and MO response (blue, circles). (c) All-dielectric MO structure based on α-Si nanodisks on ferromagnetic metallic multilayers. The right figure presents the electric field magnitude and direction maps of disk cross-sections at electric (top) and magnetic (bottom) resonances for disk radius of 190 nm. (d) All-dielectric MO structure with BIG periodic nanodisks, which supports the EIT modes. The right figure presents the transmission (T), FR (θ) and FOM (√T|θ|) spectra when EIT is excited. (e) All-dielectric MO nanoresonators composed of Si nanodisks on Ce:YIG thin films. S-polarized TMOKE is observed, which is absent in a bare Ce:YIG film. The right figure presents the reflectivity (black curve), s-TMOKE spectrum (red curve) of the metasurface, and the s-TMOKE spectrum of the bare Ce:YIG film (blue curve). (f) All-dielectric MO structure based on Ce:BIG scatterers optimized by Bayesian algorithm. The right figure presents the spectra for transmittance, FR and ellipticity. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [65, 66, 114, 117], [118], [119].
A large radiation loss exists although all-dielectric resonators exhibit low optical absorption loss. The bound state in continuum (BIC) mode has been proposed recently to reduce radiation loss. The BIC refers to a singular state that remains perfectly confined despite lying in a continuous spectrum of radiation, and it has an infinite lifetime with an ultrahigh Q-factor [120]. The interaction between the BIC mode and MO materials in all-dielectric resonators can lead to a significant enhancement of the MO effects. In 2020, Chernyak et al. theoretically analyzed the enhancement mechanisms of the MO effects in an all-dielectric nanostructure caused by the BIC resonance [121]. As shown in Figure 8(a), the device comprises Bi:YIG nanodisks with air holes displaced away from the disk center. The FR can reach 0.7° because of the high-Q (Q ∼ 3100) resonance of the BIC. In the same year, Zakharov et al. theoretically proposed an MO grating structure comprising a magnetic semiconductor Cd x Mn1−x Te that can support the BIC resonance by changing the incident angles (Figure 8(b)) [122]. A significant TMOKE strength reaching unity was demonstrated when BIC resonance was excited. In 2021, Abujetas et al. analytically and numerically investigated the tuning of the quasi-BIC mode in MO all-dielectric metasurfaces (Figure 8(c)) [123]. According to the formulation of coupled electric/magnetic dipole resonances proposed by the authors, the quasi-BIC mode in this system was attributed to the interference of the out-of-plane electric/magnetic dipole resonances with the MO-induced in-plane magnetic/electric dipole. Therefore, the MO activity can be utilized to tune and switch the quasi-BIC mode. Although the BIC mode presented large MO effects and novel MO phenomena, experimental work still faces challenges due to the high precision requirement of the nanofabrication and the difficulty of the etching process of the MO oxides.
Figure 8:
All-dielectric MO resonators with BIC resonance modes.
(a) Structure, transmittance, and FR in all-dielectric BIG nanodisks with air holes displaced away from the disk center. The right figure presents the transmission and FR spectra as function of the asymmetry factor α. (b) Structure and TMOKE in a magnetic semiconductor Cd x Mn1−x Te grating that supports BIC modes. The right figure presents the TMOKE spectra for different incident angles. (c) Tuning of BIC using applied magnetic field in all-dielectric MO structure. The middle figure presents the out-of-plane electric dipole p z and in-plane contributions p x , m y for TM polarization with (β = 1, solid curves), and without (β = 0, dash curves) MO activity. The right figure presents the out-of-plane magnetic dipole m z and in-plane contributions m x , p y for TE polarization. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [121], [122], [123].
5. Applications
5.1. Biosensing and chemical sensing
The SPR is widely used for label-free biosensing and chemical sensing [124, 125] because of the strong localization of the electric field at the interface of the metal sensitive to the surrounding medium variation. However, the large optical loss of the metals leads to a wide resonance peak of the SPR, which limits the sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) of the sensor. In comparison to SPR, MO surface plasmon resonance (MOSPR) combines the SPR and MO activity of magnetic materials, and this can enhance the TMOKE at the resonance wavelength. In this case, the MOSPR can use the narrowband MO response as the signal of sensing instead of the broad-band transmission or reflection signals. Therefore, MOSPR shows a higher FOM and lower LOD than the SPR biosensors. The first MOSPR sensor was proposed by Sepúlveda et al. who demonstrated a threefold improvement in the LOD compared to the standard SPR sensors in Co/Au heterostructures [126]. Subsequently, MOSPR with different noble metals and ferromagnetic metals for biosensing has been widely studied, e.g., Au/Co/Au [86, 127, 128] and Au/Fe/Au [129], [130], [131] trilayers. In these works, a careful theoretical analysis of the optimum multilayers was carried out to achieve maximum device sensitivity and FOM, with a focus on balancing the trade-off between MO activity and optical absorption. In 2016, Ignatyeva et al. proposed a magnetoplasmonic sensor combining a one-dimensional photonic crystal and a ferromagnetic cobalt layer [132]. The heterostructure can excite an ultralong propagating MOSPR mode with a propagation length of up to 106 μm, and this shows an extremely sharp SPP (angular width 0.06°) and MOSPR resonance (angular width 0.02°). A high-index prism is required to excite the SPR mode, which limits the devices for on-chip integration, because of the phase mismatch between free-space light and SPR. Exciting SPR with gratings has been widely studied to reduce the size of MOSPR sensors. Caballero et al. carried out a theoretical study on Au/Co/Au multilayers perforated with a periodic array of nanoholes. The FOM of the proposed MOSPR device is two orders of magnitude larger than that of a plasmonic sensor, as shown in Figure 9(a) [86]. Diaz-Valencia et al. proposed a one-dimensional magnetoplasmonic crystal comprising a periodic metal grating grown on an MO metallic substrate with a sensitivity of 190° RIU−1 and an FOM of the order of 103 (Figure 9(b)) [85]. The large optical loss of ferromagnetic metals limits the FOM and LOD. To solve this problem, magnetic oxides such as cerium/bismuth-doped yttrium iron garnet (Ce:YIG/Bi:YIG) have been utilized in combination with noble metals because of the low loss and strong MO effects of these materials [11, 14]. Qin et al. proposed a metal–insulator–metal magnetoplasmonic sensor based on Ce:YIG magnetic films [133]. The sensor showed an ultrahigh FOM (964 ± 150 RIU−1) and low LODs (4.13 × 10−6) experimentally, which is 17.8× higher and 16× lower than that of a standard Au SPR sensor, respectively, by carefully designing the structure to excite a hybrid mode between the SPR mode at the Au/air interface and the MO waveguide mode in the Ce:YIG layer (Figure 9(c)).
Figure 9:
Applications of magneto-nanophotonic devices for bio/chemical sensing.
(a) MOSPR biosensors based on the perforated nanoholes. The FOM reaches 2500 RIU−1 using TMOKE as signal for biosensing. (b) MOSPR biosensors using hybrid Au grating and ferromagnetic metal film. The angular spectra of TMOKE present high sensitivity to the medium index change. (c) MOSPR biosensors based on low loss magnetic oxides. The right figure presents the measured FOM as a function of the index of sensing medium for MOSPR biosensor. (d) MOSPR biosensors based on random Ni nanodisks. The right figure displays the ellipticity variation (Δε, red line) and 1/Δε (blue line) as a function of the wavelength. The close-up view of the 1/Δε spectrum in the inset shows a narrow full width at half-maximum (FWHM) (∼1.7 nm). (e) MOSPR biosensors based on periodic arranged Au/Co nanodisks. The middle and right figures display the resonant peak position as a function of the index of the sensing medium, and FOM for different sensing mediums. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [53, 85, 86, 133, 136].
Despite the high FOM of the MOSPR sensors, it remains difficult to achieve single-molecule sensitivity at the nanoscale. The LSPR modes excited by subwavelength structures have attracted considerable interest because of their higher surface sensitivity and point-of-care sensing capability. In 2011, Bonanni et al. proposed a magnetoplasmonic device that supports LSPR modes based on Ni nanodisks [27]. The inverse of the Kerr rotation was used as the detection signal, which presents a virtually unlimited value for the FOM (defined as the resonance shift divided by the FWHM of the resonance peak). In 2014, Maccaferri et al. experimentally demonstrated two orders of magnitude enhancement of the sensitivity compared to state-of-the-art magnetoplasmonic sensors by exploiting the control of the phase of light in Ni magnetoplasmonic nanoantennas. They reached a sensitivity of ∼0.8 ag per nanoantenna for polyamide-6.6 sensing, as shown in Figure 9(d) [53]. This phase-based sensing method was applied by other researchers to enhance the FOM of magnetoplasmonic nanogratings [134] and nanodisks [135]. Pourjamal et al. demonstrated an order of magnitude enhancement of the FOM in Ni/SiO2/Au dimer arrays compared to randomly distributed dimers, which results from the hybridization between the LSPR mode and lattice mode, to further increase the surface sensitivity [79]. More complex hybridized modes with propagating SPP, LSPR, and lattice modes were proposed by Li et al. in magnetoplasmonic sensors, and it showed a narrow Fano-like TMOKE spectrum with only sub-nanometer FWHM, as shown in Figure 9(e) [136].
5.2. Magnetic field sensing
It is natural to use magneto-nanophotonic devices for magnetic field sensing because the optical properties of such devices are sensitive to the applied magnetic field. Knyazev et al. proposed a room-temperature magnetoplasmonic magnetic field sensor for this application [47]. The magnetometer operates on the principle of the LMPIE, which was first demonstrated by Belotelov et al. in 2013 [46]. A magnetic field is sensed by the variation of transmitted or reflected light intensity caused by magnetizing the film perpendicular to the grating slits. A schematic of the magnetometer is shown in Figure 10(a), it comprises an iron garnet film and a periodic gold grating. The sensitivity of the magnetometer reaches 2 nT/Hz1/2, which is limited by shot noise. Further, the sensitivity can reach the fT/Hz1/2 level if the shot noise is reduced. In 2020, Belyaev et al. proposed a magnetic field sensor to sense direct currents (DC) based on a magnetoplasmonic crystal [137]. The sensor measures the DC magnetic field component parallel to the AC magnetic field, which reaches a sensitivity level of 300 pT (Figure 10(b)). Ignatyeva et al. designed a vector MO magnetometer, as shown in Figure 10(c) [138]. The sensor comprises highly anisotropic iron garnet films and a one-dimensional TiO2 grating. The magnetometer was expected to show a high sensitivity of up to 100 pT/Hz1/2.
Figure 10:
Applications of magneto-nanophotonic devices for magnetic field sensing.
(a) A magnetometer based on the LMPIE in Au grating on bismuth doped yttrium iron garnet thin films. The right figure presents the third-harmonic amplitude U 3 of the photodetector signal as a function of the applied magnetic field along the slits. The magnetic field oscillating at 515 Hz (indicated by a red arrow on the noise characteristic in the inset). (b) A magnetometer for direct current using an Ag grating on ferromagnetic metal Fe magnetoplasmonic device. The right figure presents the magnetic field dependence of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the relative changes of iron layer magnetic moment (ΔM). Blue dashed curves show the DC magnetic field range. (c) A magnetometer for vectoral field sensing based on all-dielectric TiO2 gratings on a BIG film. The right figure presents temporal dependence of the out-of-plane angle θ of the magnetization. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [47, 137, 138].
5.3. Magnetic field controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces
Magnetic field-controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces are important research directions for magneto-nanophotonic devices. Optical metasurfaces can be realized by designing plasmonic or dielectric nanostructures on a planar surface such that the local amplitude and phase of the reflected or transmitted light is sculptured, which can help obtain arbitrary far-field patterns. Magnetoplasmonic and all-dielectric MO nanostructures allow magnetic field-induced modulation of the amplitude and phase of each nanostructure, which adds the “time” degree of freedom. This concept of spatiotemporal active metasurfaces was first proposed in 2019 by Shaltout et al., this led to fascinating two-dimensional optical devices for wavelength conversion emulating a Doppler shift, nonreciprocal transmission, and active steering of the optical beams, as indicated in Figure 11(a) [55]. Magneto-nanophotonic metasurfaces fit perfectly in some of these applications. In 2020, Ihar et al. proposed an MO metasurface based on split-ring resonators made of BIG. These surfaces could realize optical beam steering using an applied magnetic field, as shown in Figure 11(b) [139].
Figure 11:
Magnetic field controlled active and nonreciprocal metasurfaces.
(a) Schematic of spatiotemporal metasurfaces for Doppler-like shift, nonreciprocity, and beam steering. (b) An active metasurface based on BIG split-ring resonators for optical beam steering. (c) A gyrotropic nonreciprocal metasurface comprising YIG disks and its transmission spectrum in the microwave frequency. The panels of this figure contain pictures adapted from References [55, 139, 144].
A unique property of MO metasurfaces is nonreciprocity. In magneto-nanophotonic structures, nonreciprocity can be enhanced by the excitation of the resonance modes, which can allow the nonreciprocal transmission/reflection of electromagnetic waves in a subwavelength MO metasurface. Such nonreciprocal metasurfaces are proposed based on the optical nonlinearity and spatiotemporal modulation [140], [141], [142], [143]. Interestingly, there have been a limited number of studies on MO nonreciprocal metasurfaces. Liu et al. recently demonstrated nonreciprocal chiral transmission in gyrotropic disks with low magnetic fields in the microwave frequency range via experiments, as shown in Figure 11(c) [144]. At a resonant frequency of 15.68 GHz, the isolation ratio of the metasurface exceeds 40 dB for circular polarized incidence. Although in its infancy, magneto-nanophotonic metasurfaces demonstrate promising potential for the ultrafast, efficient, and nonreciprocal control of light propagation by magnetization. We expect the emergence of such devices in the future.
6. Conclusions and perspectives
We reviewed the recent developments and applications of nanophotonic devices based on MO materials. To this end, we summarized the recent progress of different magnetoplasmonic devices and all-dielectric MO nanophotonic devices based on the different modes of MO nanophotonic structures. Further, we discussed the recent research on the application of such nanostructures for bio/chemical sensing, magnetic field sensing, and active/nonreciprocal metasurfaces.
In future studies, several research directions should be considered.
-
1)
All-dielectric MO nanostructures show promising potential for efficient light and magnetization interactions. MO effects induced by different resonant modes in all-dielectric nanostructures, such as anapole modes [145, 146] and supercavity modes [147, 148], require further theoretical and experimental investigations.
-
2)
New phenomena and new applications that extend the MO nanophotonic concept to other frequencies, such as violation of Kirchhoff’s thermal radiation law in the mid-infrared, are expected to continue developing in the coming years.
-
3)
The MO metasurfaces with nonreciprocal phase gradients are lacking, and they may allow arbitrary and nonreciprocal manipulation of the wavefront of the incident electromagnetic wave.
-
4)
The magneto-nanophotonic structure may contribute to the topological and quantum photonics. For example, MO materials may play a crucial role in realizing nontrivial topology edge states in MO photonic crystals. MO nanophotonic devices may also realize single-photon nonreciprocity without hampering quantum coherence [149].
We believe that the rich physics between light and magnetization interaction at the nanoscale will make the above research directions an exciting field to explore in the years to come.
Footnotes
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: The authors are grateful for support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51972044, 11574316, 52021001, 52102357), Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department (Grant No. 2019YFH0154), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFA0300802, 2016YFA0401803, 2018YFE0109200), the Open-Foundation of Key Laboratory of Laser Device Technology, China North Industries Group Corporation Limited (Grant No. KLLDT202102), and the Foundation of CAEP Ultra-precision Machining Technology Key Laboratory (Grant No. ZM18008).
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
Contributor Information
Jun Qin, Email: qinjun@uestc.edu.cn.
Shuang Xia, Email: xs@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Weihao Yang, Email: weihaoyang@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Hanbing Wang, Email: wanghanbin_mtrc@caep.cn.
Wei Yan, Email: weiyan@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Yucong Yang, Email: yangyczyx@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Zixuan Wei, Email: zxwei@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Wenen Liu, Email: 202022022301@std.uestc.edu.cn.
Yi Luo, Email: luoyi_mtrc@caep.cn.
Longjiang Deng, Email: denglj@uestc.edu.cn.
Lei Bi, Email: bilei@uestc.edu.cn.
References
- [1].Faraday M. I. Experimental researches in electricity.–Nineteenth series. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. . 1846;136:1–20. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1846.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Kerr J. XLIII. On rotation of the plane of polarization by reflection from the pole of a magnet. Phil. Mag. . 1877;3(19):321–343. doi: 10.1080/14786447708639245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kerr J. XXIV. On reflection of polarized light from the equatorial surface of a magnet. Phil. Mag. . 1878;5(30):161–177. doi: 10.1080/14786447808639407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Jalas D., Petrov A., Eich M., et al. What is-and what is not-an optical isolator. Nat. Photonics . 2013;7(8):579–582. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [5].de Hoop A. T. A reciprocity theorem for the electromagnetic field scattered by an obstacle. Appl. Sci. Res. B . 1960;8(1):135–140. doi: 10.1007/bf02920050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Srinivasan K., Stadler B. J. H. Magneto-optical materials and designs for integrated TE- and TM-mode planar waveguide isolators: a review [Invited] Opt. Mater. Express . 2018;8(11):3307–3318. doi: 10.1364/ome.8.003307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bi L., Hu J., Jiang P., et al. Magneto-optical thin films for on-chip monolithic integration of non-reciprocal photonic devices. Materials . 2013;6(11):5094–5117. doi: 10.3390/ma6115094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Stadler B. J. H., Mizumoto T. Integrated magneto-optical materials and isolators: a review. IEEE Photonics J. . 2014;6(1):0600215. doi: 10.1109/jphot.2013.2293618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Mizumoto T., Shoji Y., Takei R., Sakurai K. Waveguide optical isolators for integrated optics. Opt. InfoBase Conf. Pap. . 2008;48(2):252–260. doi: 10.1364/aoe.2008.suq1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Yan W., Yang Y., Liu S., et al. Waveguide-integrated high-performance magneto-optical isolators and circulators on silicon nitride platforms. Optica . 2020;7(11):1555–1562. doi: 10.1364/optica.408458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Fakhrul T., Tazlaru S., Beran L., Zhang Y., Veis M., Ross C. A. Magneto-optical Bi:YIG films with high figure of merit for nonreciprocal photonics. Adv. Opt. Mater. . 2019;7(13):1900056. doi: 10.1002/adom.201900056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Zhang Y., Wang C., Liang X., et al. Enhanced magneto-optical effect in Y1.5Ce1.5Fe5O12 thin films deposited on silicon by pulsed laser deposition. J. Alloys Compd. . 2017;703:591–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Galstyan O., Lee H., Babajanyan A., Hakhoumian A., Friedman B., Lee K. Magneto-optical visualization by Bi:YIG thin films prepared at low temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. . 2015;117(16):163914. doi: 10.1063/1.4918907. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Onbasli M. C., Beran L., Zahradnik M., et al. Optical and magneto-optical behavior of Cerium Yttrium Iron Garnet thin films at wavelengths of 200–1770 nm. Sci. Rep. . 2016;6:23640. doi: 10.1038/srep23640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Dulal P., Block A. D., Gage T. E., et al. Optimized magneto-optical isolator designs inspired by seedlayer-free terbium iron garnets with opposite chirality. ACS Photonics . 2016;3(10):1818–1825. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Hutchings D. C., Holmes B. M., Zhang C., et al. Quasi-phase-matched faraday rotation in semiconductor waveguides with a magnetooptic cladding for monolithically integrated optical isolators. IEEE Photonics J. . 2013;5(6):6602512. doi: 10.1109/jphot.2013.2292339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhang C., Dulal P., Stadler B. J. H., Hutchings D. C. Monolithically-integrated TE-mode 1D silicon-on-insulator isolators using seedlayer-free garnet. Sci. Rep. . 2017;7:5820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06043-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Kawaguchi Y., Li M., Chen K., Menon V., Alù A., Khanikaev A. B. Optical isolator based on chiral light-matter interactions in a ring resonator integrating a dichroic magneto-optical material. Appl. Phys. Lett. . 2021;118(24):241104. doi: 10.1063/5.0057558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Zaets W., Ando K. Optical waveguide isolator based on nonreciprocal loss/gain of amplifier covered by ferromagnetic layer. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. . 1999;11(8):1012–1014. doi: 10.1109/68.775330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Du Q., Wang C., Zhang Y., et al. Monolithic on-chip magneto-optical isolator with 3 dB insertion loss and 40 dB isolation ratio. ACS Photonics . 2018;5(12):5010–5016. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Zhang Y., Du Q., Wang C., et al. Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization-diverse silicon photonics. Optica . 2019;6(4):473–478. doi: 10.1364/optica.6.000473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Bossini D., Belotelov V. I., Zvezdin A. K., Kalish A. N., Kimel A. V. Magnetoplasmonics and femtosecond optomagnetism at the nanoscale. ACS Photonics . 2016;3(8):1385–1400. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Armelles G., Cebollada A., García-Martín A., González M. U. Magnetoplasmonics: combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities. Adv. Opt. Mater. . 2013;1(1):10–35. doi: 10.1002/adom.201200011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Maccaferri N., Zubritskaya I., Razdolski I., et al. “Nanoscale magnetophotonics. J. Appl. Phys. . 2020;127(8):080903. doi: 10.1063/1.5100826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Maksymov I. S. Magneto-plasmonic nanoantennas: basics and applications. Rev. Phys. . 2016;1:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.revip.2016.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Chen J., Albella P., Pirzadeh Z., et al. Plasmonic nickel nanoantennas. Small . 2011;7(16):2341–2347. doi: 10.1002/smll.201100640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Bonanni V., Bonetti S., Pakizeh T., et al. Designer magnetoplasmonics with nickel nanoferromagnets. Nano Lett. . 2011;11(12):5333–5338. doi: 10.1021/nl2028443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Banthí J. C., Meneses-Rodríguez D., García F., et al. High magneto-optical activity and low optical losses in metal-dielectric Au/Co/Au-SiO2 magnetoplasmonic nanodisks. Adv. Mater. . 2012;24(10):OP36–OP41. doi: 10.1002/adma.201103634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Armelles G., Cebollada A., García F., García-Martín A., De Sousa N. Far- and near-field broad-band magneto-optical functionalities using magnetoplasmonic nanorods. ACS Photonics . 2016;3(12):2427–2433. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Belotelov V. I., Akimov I. A., Pohl M., et al. Enhanced magneto-optical effects in magnetoplasmonic crystals. Nat. Nanotechnol. . 2011;6(6):370–376. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Chin J. Y., Steinle T., Wehlus T., et al. Nonreciprocal plasmonics enables giant enhancement of thin-film Faraday rotation. Nat. Commun. . 2013;4:1599. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Belotelov V. I., Doskolovich L. L., Zvezdin A. K. Extraordinary magneto-optical effects and transmission through metal-dielectric plasmonic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. . 2007;98(7):077401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.077401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Caballero B., García-Martín A., Cuevas J. C. Faraday effect in hybrid magneto-plasmonic photonic crystals. Opt. Express . 2015;23(17):22238. doi: 10.1364/oe.23.022238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Floess D., Hentschel M., Weiss T., et al. Plasmonic analog of electromagnetically induced absorption leads to giant thin film Faraday rotation of 14°. Phys. Rev. X . 2017;7(2):021048. doi: 10.1103/physrevx.7.021048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Guchhait S., Athira B. S., Modak N., et al. Natural weak value amplification in Fano resonance and giant Faraday rotation in magneto-plasmonic crystal. Sci. Rep. . 2020;10(1):11464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Dyakov S. A., Fradkin I. M., Gippius N. A., et al. Wide-band enhancement of the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in magnetite-based plasmonic crystals. Phys. Rev. B . 2019;100(21):214411. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.100.214411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Carvalho W. O. F., Moncada-Villa E., Oliveira O. N., Mejiá-Salazar J. R. Beyond plasmonic enhancement of the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect with low-loss high-refractive-index nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B . 2021;103(7):075412. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.103.075412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Borovkova O., Kalish A., Belotelov V. Transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in active magneto-plasmonic structures. Opt. Lett. . 2016;41(19):4593–4596. doi: 10.1364/ol.41.004593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Pohl M., Kreilkamp L. E., Belotelov V. I., et al. Tuning of the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in magneto-plasmonic crystals. New J. Phys. . 2013;15(7):075024. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/075024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Kreilkamp L. E., Belotelov V. I., Chin J. Y., et al. Waveguide-plasmon polaritons enhance transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect. Phys. Rev. X . 2014;3(4):041019. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Hamidi S. M., Tehranchi M. M. Cavity enhanced longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect in magneto-plasmonic multilayers consisting of Ce:YIG thin films incorporating gold nanoparticles. J. Supercond. Nov. Magnetism . 2012;25(6):2097–2100. doi: 10.1007/s10948-012-1591-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Vincent R., Marinchio H., Sáenz J. J., Carminati R. Local control of the excitation of surface plasmon polaritons by near-field magneto-optical Kerr effect. Phys. Rev. B. . 2014;90(24):241412. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.90.241412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Hamidi S. M., Tehranchi M. M. Longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect in magneto-plasmonic heterostructures. J. Supercond. Nov. Magnetism . 2013;26(5):1585–1587. doi: 10.1007/s10948-012-1902-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Maccaferri N., Inchausti X., García-Martín A., et al. Resonant enhancement of magneto-optical activity induced by surface plasmon polariton modes coupling in 2D magnetoplasmonic crystals. ACS Photonics . 2015;2(12):1769–1779. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Zubritskaya I., Lodewijks K., Maccaferri N., et al. Active magnetoplasmonic ruler. Nano Lett. . 2015;15(5):3204–3211. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Belotelov V. I., Kreilkamp L. E., Akimov I. A., et al. Plasmon-mediated magneto-optical transparency. Nat. Commun. . 2013;4:2128. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Knyazev G. A., Kapralov P. O., Gusev N. A., et al. Magnetoplasmonic crystals for highly sensitive magnetometry. ACS Photonics . 2018;5(12):4951–4959. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Belotelov V. I., Zvezdin A. K. Inverse transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect. Phys. Rev. B . 2012;86(15):155133. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.86.155133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Belotelov V. I., Bezus E. A., Doskolovich L. L., Kalish A. N., Zvezdin A. K. Inverse Faraday effect in plasmonic heterostructures. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. . 2010;200(9):092003. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/200/9/092003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Chekhov A. L., Stognij A. I., Satoh T., Murzina T. V., Razdolski I., Stupakiewicz A. Surface plasmon-mediated nanoscale localization of laser-driven sub-terahertz spin dynamics in magnetic dielectrics. Nano Lett. . 2018;18(5):2970–2975. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Kazlou A., Chekhov A. L., Stognij A. I., Razdolski I., Stupakiewicz A. Surface plasmon-enhanced photomagnetic excitation of spin dynamics in Au/YIG:Co magneto-plasmonic crystals. ACS Photonics . 2021;8(8):2197–2202. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Mishra K., Ciuciulkaite A., Zapata-herrera M., et al. Ultrafast demagnetization in a ferrimagnet under electromagnetic field funneling. Nanoscale . 2021;13(46):19367–19375. doi: 10.1039/d1nr04308k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Maccaferri N., Gregorczyk K. E., De Oliveira T. V. A. G., et al. Ultrasensitive and label-free molecular-level detection enabled by light phase control in magnetoplasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. . 2015;6:6150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Jeong K. J., Lee D. K., Tran V. T., et al. Helical magnetic field-induced real-time plasmonic chirality modulation. ACS Nano . 2020;14(6):7152–7160. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Shaltout A. M., Shalaev V. M., Brongersma M. L. Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces. Science . 2019;364(6441):eaat3100. doi: 10.1126/science.aat3100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Baranov D. G., Zuev D. A., Lepeshov S. I., et al. All-dielectric nanophotonics: the quest for better materials and fabrication techniques. Optica . 2017;4(7):814–825. doi: 10.1364/optica.4.000814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Sun S., Zhou Z., Zhang C., et al. All-dielectric full-color printing with TiO2 metasurfaces. ACS Nano . 2017;11(5):4445–4452. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Park C. S., Koirala I., Gao S., Shrestha V. R., Lee S. S., Choi D. Y. Structural color filters based on an all-dielectric metasurface exploiting silicon-rich silicon nitride nanodisks. Opt. Express . 2019;27(2):667–679. doi: 10.1364/oe.27.000667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Maksymov I. S., Hutomo J., Kostylev M. Transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in subwavelength dielectric gratings. Opt. Express . 2014;22(7):8720–8725. doi: 10.1364/oe.22.008720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Voronov A. A., Ignatyeva D. O., Kozhaev M. A., Levy M., Karki D., Belotelov V. I. TMOKE enhancement in structured all-dielectric iron-garnet films with waveguide modes. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. . 2020;1461:012189. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1461/1/012189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Bsawmaii L., Gamet E., Royer F., Neveu S., Jamon D. Longitudinal magneto-optical effect enhancement with high transmission through a 1D all-dielectric resonant guided mode grating. Opt. Express . 2020;28(6):8436–8444. doi: 10.1364/oe.385634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Ignatyeva D. O., Karki D., Voronov A. A., et al. All-dielectric magnetic metasurface for advanced light control in dual polarizations combined with high-Q resonances. Nat. Commun. . 2020;11(1):5487. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19310-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Zhao B., Shi Y., Wang J., Zhao Z., Zhao N., Fan S. Near-complete violation of Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 T magnetic field. Opt. Lett. . 2019;44(17):4203–4206. doi: 10.1364/ol.44.004203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Park Y., Asadchy V. S., Zhao B., Guo C., Wang J., Fan S. Violating Kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation in semitransparent structures. . 2021 arXiv:2105.08954. [Google Scholar]
- [65].de Sousa N., Froufe-Pérez L. S., Saénz J. J., Garciá-Martín A. Magneto-optical activity in high index dielectric nanoantennas. Sci. Rep. . 2016;6:30803. doi: 10.1038/srep30803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Xia S., Ignatyeva D., Liu Q., et al. Circular displacement current induced anomalous magneto-optical effects in high index Mie resonators. . 2021 arXiv:2108.00615. [Google Scholar]
- [67].Sepúlveda B., González-Díaz J. B., García-Martín A., Lechuga L. M., Armelles G. Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks. Phys. Rev. Lett. . 2010;104(14):147401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.147401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Pineider F., Campo G., Bonanni V., et al. Circular magnetoplasmonic modes in gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. . 2013;13(10):4785–4789. doi: 10.1021/nl402394p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Cheng O. H. C., Son D. H., Sheldon M. Light-induced magnetism in plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nat. Photonics . 2020;14(6):365–368. doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0603-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Kuttruff J., Gabbani A., Petrucci G., et al. Magneto-optical activity in nonmagnetic hyperbolic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. . 2021;127(21):217402. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.127.217402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Maccaferri N., Berger A., Bonetti S., et al. Tuning the magneto-optical response of nanosize ferromagnetic Ni disks using the phase of localized plasmons. Phys. Rev. Lett. . 2013;111(16):167401. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.111.167401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Maccaferri N., Bergamini L., Pancaldi M., et al. Anisotropic nanoantenna-based magnetoplasmonic crystals for highly enhanced and tunable magneto-optical activity. Nano Lett. . 2016;16(4):2533–2542. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Maksymov I. S. Magneto-plasmonics and resonant interaction of light with dynamic magnetisation in metallic and all-magneto-dielectric nanostructures. Nanomaterials . 2015;5(2):577–613. doi: 10.3390/nano5020577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Floess D., Giessen H. Nonreciprocal hybrid magnetoplasmonics. Rep. Prog. Phys. . 2018;81(11):116401. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aad6a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Maccaferri N. Coupling phenomena and collective effects in resonant meta-atoms supporting both plasmonic and (opto-)magnetic functionalities: an overview on properties and applications [Invited] J. Opt. Soc. Am. B . 2019;36(7):E112–E131. doi: 10.1364/josab.36.00e112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Rizal C., Manera M. G., Ignatyeva D. O., et al. Magnetophotonics for sensing and magnetometry toward industrial applications. J. Appl. Phys. . 2021;130(23):230901. doi: 10.1063/5.0072884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Bi Y., Huang L., Li X., Wang Y. Magnetically controllable metasurface and its application. Front. Optoelectron. . 2021;14(2):154–169. doi: 10.1007/s12200-021-1125-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Feng H. Y., Luo F., Kekesi R., et al. Magnetoplasmonic nanorings as novel architectures with tunable magneto-optical activity in wide wavelength ranges. Adv. Opt. Mater. . 2014;2(7):612–617. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Pourjamal S., Kataja M., Maccaferri N., Vavassori P., Van Dijken S. Hybrid Ni/SiO2/Au dimer arrays for high-resolution refractive index sensing. Nanophotonics . 2018;7(5):905–912. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2018-0013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Freire-Fernández F., Mansell R., Van Dijken S. Magnetoplasmonic properties of perpendicularly magnetized [Co/Pt]N nanodots. Phys. Rev. B . 2020;101(5):054416. [Google Scholar]
- [81].Zhu R., Chen L., Zong Z., et al. Tuning the shape of magneto-optical Kerr spectrum by changing the strip width in one-dimensional Ag–Co–Ag magnetoplasmonic nanogratings. Appl. Phys. Lett. . 2019;115(7):072405. doi: 10.1063/1.5096912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Grunin A. A., Zhdanov A. G., Ezhov A. A., Ganshina E. A., Fedyanin A. A. Surface-plasmon-induced enhancement of magneto-optical Kerr effect in all-nickel subwavelength nanogratings. Appl. Phys. Lett. . 2010;97(26):261908. doi: 10.1063/1.3533260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Luong H. M., Pham M. T., Nguyen T. D., Zhao Y. Enhanced resonant faraday rotation in multilayer magnetoplasmonic nanohole arrays and their sensing application. J. Phys. Chem. C . 2019;123(46):28377–28384. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Luong H. M., Pham M. T., Ai B., Nguyen T. D., Zhao Y. Magnetoplasmonic properties of Ag–Co composite nanohole arrays. Phys. Rev. B . 2019;99(22):224413. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.99.224413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Diaz-Valencia B. F., Mejía-Salazar J. R., Oliveira O. N., Porras-Montenegro N., Albella P. Enhanced transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in magnetoplasmonic crystals for the design of highly sensitive plasmonic (bio)sensing platforms. ACS Omega . 2017;2(11):7682–7685. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Caballero B., Garciá-Martín A., Cuevas J. C. Hybrid magnetoplasmonic crystals boost the performance of nanohole arrays as plasmonic sensors. ACS Photonics . 2016;3(2):203–208. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Kataja M., Hakala T. K., Julku A., Huttunen M. J., Van Dijken S., Törmä P. Surface lattice resonances and magneto-optical response in magnetic nanoparticle arrays. Nat. Commun. . 2015;6:7072. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Chen L., Gao J., Xia W., et al. Tunable Fano resonance and magneto-optical response in magnetoplasmonic structure fabricated by pure ferromagnetic metals. Phys. Rev. B . 2016;93(21):214411. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.93.214411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Rowan-robinson R. M., Hurst J., Ciuciulkaite A., et al. Direction-sensitive magnetophotonic surface crystals. Adv. Photonics Res. . 2021;2(10):2100119. doi: 10.1002/adpr.202100119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Frolov A. Y., Shcherbakov M. R., Fedyanin A. A. Dark mode enhancing magneto-optical Kerr effect in multilayer magnetoplasmonic crystals. Phys. Rev. B . 2020;101(4):045409. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.101.045409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [91].López-Ortega A., Zapata-Herrera M., Maccaferri N., et al. Enhanced magnetic modulation of light polarization exploiting hybridization with multipolar dark plasmons in magnetoplasmonic nanocavities. Light Sci. Appl. . 2020;9(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41377-020-0285-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Kalish A. N., Komarov R. S., Kozhaev M. A., et al. Magnetoplasmonic quasicrystals: an approach for multiband magneto-optical response. Optica . 2018;5(5):617–623. doi: 10.1364/optica.5.000617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Borovkova O. V., Hashim H., Ignatyeva D. O., et al. Magnetoplasmonic structures with broken spatial symmetry for light control at normal incidence. Phys. Rev. B . 2020;102(8):081405. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.102.081405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Yang W., Liu Q., Wang H., et al. Observation of optical gyromagnetic properties in a magneto-plasmonic metamaterial. . 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29452-9. arXiv:2110.05698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Probst P. T., Mayer M., Gupta V., et al. Mechano-tunable chiral metasurfaces via colloidal assembly. Nat. Mater. . 2021;20(7):1024–1028. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-00991-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Li J., Wang M., Wu Z., et al. Tunable chiral optics in all-solid-phase reconfigurable dielectric nanostructures. Nano Lett. . 2021;21(2):973–979. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Hentschel M., Schäferling M., Duan X., Giessen H., Liu N. Chiral plasmonics. Sci. Adv. . 2017;3(5):e1602735. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Yin X., Schäferling M., Michel A. K. U., et al. Active chiral plasmonics. Nano Lett. . 2015;15(7):4255–4260. doi: 10.1021/nl5042325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Armelles G., Caballero B., Prieto P., et al. Magnetic field modulation of chirooptical effects in magnetoplasmonic structures. Nanoscale . 2014;6(7):3737–3741. doi: 10.1039/c3nr05889a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Armelles G., Cebollada A., Feng H. Y., et al. Interaction effects between magnetic and chiral building blocks: a new route for tunable magneto-chiral plasmonic structures. ACS Photonics . 2015;2(9):1272–1277. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Zubritskaya I., Maccaferri N., Inchausti Ezeiza X., Vavassori P., Dmitriev A. Magnetic control of the chiroptical plasmonic surfaces. Nano Lett. . 2018;18(1):302–307. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Qin J., Deng L., Kang T., et al. Switching the optical chirality in magnetoplasmonic metasurfaces using applied magnetic fields. ACS Nano . 2020;14(3):2808–2816. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Luong H. M., Pham M. T., Nguyen T. D., Zhao Y. Active Ag/Co composite chiral nanohole arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C . 2021;125(1):716–723. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Petrucci G., Gabbani A., Faniayeu I., et al. Macroscopic magneto-chiroptical metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. . 2021;118(25):251108. doi: 10.1063/5.0050797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Royer F., Varghese B., Gamet E., Neveu S., Jourlin Y., Jamon D. Enhancement of both Faraday and Kerr effects with an all-dielectric grating based on a magneto-optical nanocomposite material. ACS Omega . 2020;5(6):2886–2892. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Voronov A. A., Karki D., Ignatyeva D. O., et al. Magneto-optics of subwavelength all-dielectric gratings. Opt. Express . 2020;28(12):17988–17996. doi: 10.1364/oe.394722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Bai B., Tervo J., Turunen J. Polarization conversion in resonant magneto-optic gratings. New J. Phys. . 2006;8(9):205. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Gamet E., Varghese B., Verrier I., Royer F. Enhancement of magneto-optical effects by a single 1D all dielectric resonant grating. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. . 2017;50(49):495105. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa949e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Zimnyakova P. E., Ignatyeva D. O., Karki D., et al. Magneto-optics of the 2D iron-garnet nanocylinder array with localized and lattice modes. . 2021 arXiv:2108.07056. [Google Scholar]
- [110].Zhu L., Fan S. Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation. Phys. Rev. B . 2014;90(22):220301. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.90.220301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Zhao B., Guo C., Garcia C. A. C., Narang P., Fan S. Axion-field-enabled nonreciprocal thermal radiation in Weyl semimetals. Nano Lett. . 2020;20(3):1923–1927. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Pajovic S., Tsurimaki Y., Qian X., Chen G. Intrinsic nonreciprocal reflection and violation of Kirchhoff’s law of radiation in planar type-I magnetic Weyl semimetal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B . 2020;102(16):165417. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.102.165417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Asadchy V. S., Guo C., Zhao B., Fan S. Sub-wavelength passive optical isolators using photonic structures based on Weyl semimetals. Adv. Opt. Mater. . 2020;8(16):36–39. doi: 10.1002/adom.202000100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Barsukova M. G., Shorokhov A. S., Musorin A. I., Neshev D. N., Kivshar Y. S., Fedyanin A. A. Magneto-optical response enhanced by Mie resonances in nanoantennas. ACS Photonics . 2017;4(10):2390–2395. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Musorin A. I., Barsukova M. G., Shorokhov A. S., Luk’yanchuk B. S., Fedyanin A. A. Manipulating the light intensity by magnetophotonic metasurfaces. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. . 2018;459:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.11.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Barsukova M. G., Musorin A. I., Shorokhov A. S., Fedyanin A. A. Enhanced magneto-optical effects in hybrid Ni-Si metasurfaces. APL Photonics . 2019;4(1):016102. doi: 10.1063/1.5066307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Abendroth J. M., Solomon M. L., Barton D. R., El Hadri M. S., Fullerton E. E., Dionne J. A. Helicity-preserving metasurfaces for magneto-optical enhancement in ferromagnetic [Pt/Co]N films. Adv. Opt. Mater. . 2020;8(22):2001420. doi: 10.1002/adom.202001420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Christofi A., Kawaguchi Y., Alù A., Khanikaev A. B. Giant enhancement of Faraday rotation due to electromagnetically induced transparency in all-dielectric magneto-optical metasurfaces. Opt. Lett. . 2018;43(8):1838–1841. doi: 10.1364/ol.43.001838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Kiel T., Varytis P., Beverungen B., Kristensen P. T., Busch K. Enhanced Faraday rotation by dielectric metasurfaces with Bayesian shape-optimized scatterers. Opt. Lett. . 2021;46(7):1720–1723. doi: 10.1364/ol.419891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Hsu C. W., Zhen B., Lee J., et al. Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum. Nature . 2013;499(7457):188–191. doi: 10.1038/nature12289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Chernyak A. M., Barsukova M. G., Shorokhov A. S., Musorin A. I., Fedyanin A. A. Bound states in the continuum in magnetophotonic metasurfaces. JETP Lett. . 2020;111(1):46–49. doi: 10.1134/s0021364020010105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Zakharov V. A., Poddubny A. N. Transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect enhanced at the bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. A . 2020;101(4):043848. doi: 10.1103/physreva.101.043848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Abujetas D. R., De Sousa N., García-Martín A., Llorens J. M., Sánchez-Gil J. A. Active angular tuning and switching of Brewster quasi bound states in the continuum in magneto-optic metasurfaces. Nanophotonics . 2021;10(17):4223–4232. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Abdulhalim I., Zourob M., Lakhtakia A. Surface plasmon resonance for biosensing: a mini-review. Electromagnetics . 2008;28(3):214–242. doi: 10.1080/02726340801921650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Petryayeva E., Krull U. J. Localized surface plasmon resonance: nanostructures, bioassays and biosensing-A review. Anal. Chim. Acta . 2011;706(1):8–24. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Sepúlveda B., Calle A., Lechuga L. M., Armelles G. Highly sensitive detection of biomolecules with the magneto-optic surface-plasmon-resonance sensor. Opt. Lett. . 2006;31(8):1085–1087. doi: 10.1364/ol.31.001085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Armelles G., González-Díaz J. B., García-Martín A., et al. Localized surface plasmon resonance effects on the magneto-optical activity of continuous Au/Co/Au trilayers. Opt. Express . 2008;16(20):16104–16112. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.016104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Regatos D., Sepúlveda B., Fariña D., Carrascosa L. G., Lechuga L. M. Suitable combination of noble/ferromagnetic metal multilayers for enhanced magneto-plasmonic biosensing. Opt. Express . 2011;19(9):8336–8346. doi: 10.1364/oe.19.008336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Suzuki S., Maeda T., Ogura T., Suzuki S., Kaihara T., Shimizu H. Modulation of surface plasmon resonance by magnetization reversal in Au/Fe/Au trilayer and wedge structure for achieving higher refractive index sensitivity. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2021;60:SBBI06. doi: 10.35848/1347-4065/abea4b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Regatos D., Farina D., Calle A., et al. Au/Fe/Au multilayer transducers for magneto-optic surface plasmon resonance sensing. J. Appl. Phys. . 2010;108(5):054502. doi: 10.1063/1.3475711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Ferreiro-Vila E., Iglesias M., Paz E., et al. Magneto-optical and magnetoplasmonic properties of epitaxial and polycrystalline Au/Fe/Au trilayers. Phys. Rev. B . 2011;83(20):205120. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.83.205120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Ignatyeva D. O., Knyazev G. A., Kapralov P. O., Dietler G., Sekatskii S. K., Belotelov V. I. Magneto-optical plasmonic heterostructure with ultranarrow resonance for sensing applications. Sci. Rep. . 2016;6:28077. doi: 10.1038/srep28077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Qin J., Zhang Y., Liang X., et al. Ultrahigh figure-of-merit in metal–insulator–metal magnetoplasmonic sensors using low loss magneto-optical oxide thin films. ACS Photonics . 2017;4(6):1403–1412. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Tang Z., Chen L., Zhang C., et al. Enhancing the figure of merit of refractive index sensors by magnetoplasmons in nanogratings. Opt. Lett. . 2018;43(20):5090–5093. doi: 10.1364/ol.43.005090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Herreño-Fierro C. A., Patiño E. J., Armelles G., Cebollada A. Surface sensitivity of optical and magneto-optical and ellipsometric properties in magnetoplasmonic nanodisks. Appl. Phys. Lett. . 2016;108(2):021109. [Google Scholar]
- [136].Li L., Zong X., Liu Y. All-metallic metasurfaces towards high-performance magneto-plasmonic sensing devices. Photon. Res. . 2020;8(11):1742–1748. doi: 10.1364/prj.399926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Belyaev V. K., Rodionova V. V., Grunin A. A., Inoue M., Fedyanin A. A. Magnetic field sensor based on magnetoplasmonic crystal. Sci. Rep. . 2020;10(1):7133. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63535-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Ignatyeva D. O., Knyazev G. A., Kalish A. N., Chernov A. I., Belotelov V. I. Vector magneto-optical magnetometer based on resonant all-dielectric gratings with highly anisotropic iron garnet films. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. . 2021;54(29):295001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/abfb1c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Faniayeu I., Dmitriev A. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics . OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America); 2020. Dynamic beam steering by all-dielectric magneto-optical nanoantennas. paper FW3Q.3. [Google Scholar]
- [140].Zhang L., Chen X. Q., Shao R. W., et al. Breaking reciprocity with space-time-coding digital metasurfaces. Adv. Mater. . 2019;31(41):1904069. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Lawrence M., Barton D. R., Dionne J. A. Nonreciprocal flat optics with silicon metasurfaces. Nano Lett. . 2018;18(2):1104–1109. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Shaltout A., Kildishev A., Shalaev V. Time-varying metasurfaces and Lorentz non-reciprocity. Opt. Mater. Express . 2015;5(11):2459–2467. doi: 10.1364/ome.5.002459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Guo X., Ding Y., Duan Y., Ni X. Nonreciprocal metasurface with space-time phase modulation. Light Sci. Appl. . 2019;8(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0225-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Liu N., Zhao J., Du L., et al. Giant nonreciprocal transmission in low-biased gyrotropic metasurfaces. Opt. Lett. . 2020;45(21):5917–5920. doi: 10.1364/ol.404765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Ospanova A. K., Stenishchev I. V., Basharin A. A. Anapole mode sustaining silicon metamaterials in visible spectral range. Laser Photon. Rev. . 2018;12(7):1800005. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201800005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Nemkov N. A., Stenishchev I. V., Basharin A. A. Nontrivial nonradiating all-dielectric anapole. Sci. Rep. . 2017;7:1064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01127-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Rybin M. V., Koshelev K. L., Sadrieva Z. F., et al. High-Q supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. . 2017;119(24):243901. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.243901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Odit M., Koshelev K., Gladyshev S., Ladutenko K., Kivshar Y., Bogdanov A. Observation of supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators. Adv. Mater. . 2021;33(1):2003804. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Ren S. Y., Yan W., Feng L. T., et al. Single-photon non-reciprocity with an integrated magneto-optical isolator. . 2021 arXiv:2107.09516. [Google Scholar]











