Abstract
Nonunions are a vexing problem for the orthopedic surgeon. Herein, we describe an adjunct to the standard exchange nailing procedure adapted from an established limb lengthening technique in which cortical vents are drilled adjacent to the nonunion site. These transcortical drill tunnels facilitate local dispersion of the osteogenic intramedullary reamings around the nonunion site during the exchange nailing, whereby the extruded reamings serve as autograft for the nonunion. This simple adjunctive technique can increase the likelihood of achieving union when performed with an exchange nailing procedure as demonstrated by our case series of recalcitrant tibia and femoral nonunions successfully treated when this surgical adjunct was implemented.
Keywords: cortical venting, exchange nailing, long bone fractures, nonunion, orthopaedic trauma
Introduction
Long bone nonunion is a debilitating condition associated with devastating functional, psychological, and financial ramifications [1-3]. Factors contributing to its development include mechanical instability, inadequate bone contact, infection, a compromised soft tissue envelope, and deficient vascularity at the fracture site. A nonunion is characterized as aseptic or septic, hypertrophic, oligotrophic, or atrophic, which is determined by its etiology. Successful treatment is contingent upon addressing the underlying factors contributing to its formation.
Tibial and femoral shaft nonunions typically present with severe pain and inability to bear weight on the affected extremity. Nonunion of the tibia is more common than nonunion of any other long bone fracture with a rate of occurrence ranging from 5% to 15% [1,4,5]. Femoral shaft nonunion occurs less frequently, but still affects 0.9%-4% of patients [6-9]. The goal of treatment for this condition is to achieve union and regain pain-free function of the extremity. Treatments for this condition focus on increasing mechanical stability and improving biological conditions around the challenged bone.
Multiple treatment options exist for addressing tibial and femoral nonunion encompassing both non-operative and operative methods. Treatment options include the use of external bone stimulators, open application of bone graft material to the nonunion, augmentative plating across the nonunion, Ilizarov ringed external fixation, nail dynamization, and exchange nailing. Although an in-depth review of these treatment options is beyond the scope of this article, we will describe exchange nailing because it is a well-established and commonly implemented technique for treating long bone nonunions that we have modified to further encourage successful healing of this condition. In a standard exchange nailing operation, the original intramedullary nail is removed, the canal is over-reamed by 1 mm, and then a new nail 2 mm larger than the original is inserted in the canal [10]. The larger diameter nail imparts greater rigidity and increases its endosteal contact than the original nail, thereby improving the mechanical stability of the construct [10-12]. Moreover, the biological effects from reaming of the intramedullary canal increase periosteal blood flow in response to the disruption of endosteal circulation, which further promotes bone healing at the nonunion site [13]. Despite the high rates of union associated with the standard exchange nailing procedure [11,12,14] and the multitude of other established treatment options, persistent long bone nonunions continue to pose a problem for orthopedic surgeons [15]. Herein, we describe an adjunctive technique to the standard exchange nailing procedure for treating tibial and femoral shaft nonunions adapted from an established limb lengthening technique to increase the likelihood of achieving union [16,17]. This modification involves drilling cortical vents adjacent to the nonunion to facilitate the egress of osteogenic intramedullary reamings around the nonunion site. We demonstrate this adjunctive technique’s effectiveness in a limited consecutive series of patients with recalcitrant nonunions of the tibia and femur who then went on to achieve union after this technique was implemented as part of their nonunion treatment.
Technique description
Patient positioning for the exchange nailing is dependent on the surgeon's preferred position for addressing the nonunited bone. For tibial nonunions, the patient is positioned supine on the operating room table with the operative leg placed in either the semi-extended position or flexed at the knee. For femoral nonunions, the patient is positioned supine or in the lateral decubitus position with or without a fracture table, depending on the surgeon’s preference for performing an exchange nailing of the femur. The area of the nonunion is localized with intraoperative fluoroscopy. If not already done so, any intramedullary nail or other obstructing implants around the nonunion are removed. A 1 cm incision is made at the level of the nonunion just lateral to the tibial crest (for tibial nonunions) or through the lateral aspect of the thigh’s anterior compartment (for femoral nonunions). Blunt dissection is performed through the incision to gently mobilize the soft tissue from the underlying bone. We use a 3.5 mm drill bit to drill multiple transcortical vents around the nonunion site through the 1 cm incision. Additional 1 cm incisions are made as needed to ensure drill bit access throughout the nonunion site. Care is taken to avoid thermal injury while drilling the cortical vents by operating the drill at low speed, stopping frequently, and irrigating the drill bit with cool water. A standard exchange nailing is then performed in which the intramedullary canal is over-reamed and a larger diameter nail is inserted and statically locked within the canal. We allow our patients to bear full weight on the operative extremity following the surgery to further encourage union.
Case presentation
The following consecutive series of cases treated by the senior author highlight this adjunctive technique’s potential effectiveness in helping to achieve successful bone healing when treating high-risk or recalcitrant nonunions (Table 1).
Table 1. Case series injury, patient, and treatment characteristics.
Patient | Initial injury* | Age at injury (years) | Risk factor for nonunion | Type of nonunion | Additional procedures | Definitive nonunion treatment performed in conjunction with cortical venting technique | Length of follow-up after definitive nonunion treatment |
1 | 42B2 | 30 | Comminution, compartment syndrome | Oligotrophic | Exchange nailing x2 with bone grafting | Staged exchange nailing | 48 months |
2 | 42A3 | 69 | Smoker, advanced age, open fracture, osteomyelitis | Hypertrophic | Removal of hardware (nail), application of Ilizarov external fixator frame, I&D (osteomyelitis) | Motorized telescoping intramedullary nail compressing across the nonunion | 48 months |
3 | 42B2 | 56 | Smoker, open segmental fracture requiring flap coverage, multiple surgeries | Oligotrophic | Exchange nailing | Staged exchange nailing | 60 months |
4 | 33A3 | 32 | Open comminuted fracture, need for skin graft coverage, polytrauma | Oligotrophic | Retrograde IMN, revision to distal femur lateral locking plate with bone grafting, removal of distal femur lateral locking plate | Single-stage exchange nailing | 72 months |
Case 1
A 30-year-old male non-smoker sustained a closed, comminuted tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA 42B2), a segmental fibula fracture, and a syndesmotic injury of his left lower extremity resulting from a motorcycle crash. Initial treatment of these fractures performed at another institution consisted of intramedullary nailing of the tibia and the distal fibula and fixation of the syndesmosis with a syndesmotic screw. His immediate postoperative course was complicated by the onset of compartment syndrome of the leg, necessitating a four-compartment fasciotomy. The patient subsequently developed a tibial nonunion for which he underwent two exchange nailing procedures with open bone grafting over the ensuing two years.
Despite these two exchange nailing procedures, the patient’s nonunion persisted at which time he was referred to the senior author for potential transtibial amputation (Figures 1A, 1B). Radiographs obtained at the time of this presentation demonstrated a nonunited tibia that was shortened, in valgus, and externally rotated. Given the patient’s frustration and willingness to consider amputation, the treatment strategy was tailored to treat his nonunion first with a staged exchange nailing and then address his tibia deformity at a later date. During the first stage of treating the nonunion, the intramedullary nail was removed and intramedullary cultures were obtained. Upon ruling out infection with the finalization of the cultures, the second stage was performed in which percutaneous cortical vent tunnels were drilled in conjunction with a third exchange nailing. Within a few months of this third exchange nailing operation, the patient reported decreased pain, and his radiographs demonstrated callus formation at the nonunion site. Radiographs obtained 12 months following this revision demonstrated tibial union, by which time he had returned to running and other recreational athletic activities (Figure 1C). Since then, he decided to forgo subsequent deformity correction surgery.
Case 2
A 69-year-old male smoker developed a nonunion following intramedullary nailing of an open tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA 42A3) resulting from a forklift accident. Prior to the presentation, he underwent several nonunion surgeries over an 11-year period, starting with an exchange nailing with open bone grafting approximately one year after injury. Seven years later, he underwent removal of the intramedullary nail for presumed symptomatic hardware that unbeknownst at that time was actually a hypertrophic nonunion (Figure 2A). Two years later, he underwent Ilizarov ringed external fixation treatment for his nonunion. Unfortunately, the patient developed osteomyelitis of the tibia during the course of this treatment requiring irrigation and debridement and intravenous antibiotics to eradicate the infection. His nonunion persisted following a year of Ilizarov treatment so further treatment with the ringed external fixator was discontinued at that time.
Approximately one year following the removal of the external fixator, treatment of the tibial nonunion was reinitiated with the insertion of a motorized telescoping intramedullary nail used to compress across the nonunion. Prior to reaming the canal, cortical vents were percutaneously drilled using the described technique. The nail was incrementally compressed by 2 mm every four weeks throughout the postoperative period. The patient’s pain continued to improve as his follow-up radiographs demonstrated progressive union over the ensuing months. One year following this surgery, radiographs showed a united tibia and the patient’s pain had resolved (Figure 2B). The nail was removed 18 months after placement, and the patient remained pain- and complication-free since then (Figure 2C).
Case 3
A 56-year-old male smoker sustained an open tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA 42B2) resulting from a motorcycle crash. This injury was treated with debridement of the wound, intramedullary nailing of the tibia and fibula, a soleus flap, and split-thickness skin grafting (Figure 3A). The patient subsequently developed an aseptic nonunion of the tibia fracture (Figure 3B). Six months after the index surgery, he underwent staged exchange nailing. In the first stage, the initial nail was removed and tissue cultures were obtained. He underwent an exchange nailing two weeks later with percutaneously drilled cortical vents after confirming that his nonunion was aseptic. Over the next several months, the patient reported improvement in his pain as the nonunion healed. Although the patient achieved bony union following this surgery, he was unable to progress to running due to ipsilateral symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis (Figure 3C).
Case 4
A 32-year-old male sustained a right open comminuted distal third diaphyseal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33A3) and several other lower extremity and pelvic fractures in a motorcycle crash. He initially underwent external fixation of the femur fracture and skin grafting over the medial thigh wound before undergoing a right femur retrograde intramedullary nailing at an outside institution. He subsequently presented to our institution with his quadriceps tendon in discontinuity, transected by the butterfly fragment approximately four weeks after his injury. At that point, no callus was noted around the intramedullary implant (Figure 4A). He was revised to a lateral distal femur locking plate with bone grafting and quadriceps tendon repair after infection was ruled out (Figure 4B). He subsequently underwent additional surgeries on his contralateral lower extremity, which resulted in increased functional demands on the healing right femur fracture due to contralateral weight-bearing restrictions. He continued to experience right thigh pain eight months after his femur plating, at which time a CT demonstrated a persistent oligotrophic femoral nonunion with 2.5 cm of shortening (Figure 4C). At this point, the patient underwent the removal of hardware and retrograde intramedullary nailing performed in conjunction with pre-drilling cortical vents around the nonunion. The patient went on to achieve union with robust bridging bone over the ensuing months (Figure 4D). The patient resumed full weight bearing on the right lower extremity without any complications related to the former femoral nonunion; however, he continued to experience considerable functional challenges due to his contralateral lower extremity injuries. As a result, he elected to undergo contralateral transtibial amputation two years after his initial injury, but he continued to have reasonable weight-bearing function with his right lower extremity.
Discussion
The described cortical venting technique adapts the use of percutaneous drill osteotomies often utilized in a motorized telescoping intramedullary nail limb lengthening procedure to the exchange nailing procedure commonly performed in long bone nonunion surgery. In the limb lengthening setting, a series of percutaneous holes are drilled at the planned osteotomy site, followed by reaming of the intramedullary canal and completion of the osteotomy site [16,17]. Proceeding in this sequence allows for the local accumulation of vented osteogenic reamings, which then enhances the development of regenerate bone formation [17].
While the local deposition of osteogenic intramedullary reamings is assured in fresh fractures, the fracture site of most nonunions is filled with fibrous tissue. We contend that this fibrous tissue prevents most, if not all, intramedullary reamings generated during an exchange nailing from being deposited at the nonunion site, in contrast to the local extrusion of reamings that occurs while reaming a fresh fracture. Instead, the fibrous tissue directs these reamings away from the nonunion site either into the distal extent of the canal or causes them to be extruded proximally through the entry portal when performing an exchange nailing. These cortical vents allow for egress of osteogenic intramedullary reamings into and around the nonunion, thereby positioning the autograft at the nonunion site and encouraging new bridging bone to form there.
Drilling the cortical vents recruits osteoinductive mediators by stimulating bleeding in the area. These osteoinductive mediators induce the extruded reamings’ mesenchymal cells to differentiate into chondrocytes. In turn, these chondrocytes secrete cartilage matrix before undergoing hypertrophic differentiation that mineralizes the surrounding matrix, resulting in bone callus formation [18]. We contend that this optimized biologic environment around the nonunion site complements the effect of increased mechanical stability associated with insertion of a larger intramedullary nail in the exchange nailing and therefore further enhances the nonunion’s ability to heal.
There are several advantages to the described adjunctive cortical venting technique. We contend that it is simple and quick to perform, utilizing instruments already available for performing an exchange nailing procedure. Moreover, the relatively small incisions made to accommodate percutaneous drilling enable the accumulation of bone autograft around the nonunion while bypassing the inherent morbidity of making an open approach to the area for applying bone graft. This is particularly beneficial in patients with a compromised soft tissue envelope surrounding the nonunion.
We achieved successful outcomes using the adjunctive cortical venting technique in our consecutive series of recalcitrant nonunions presented. However, we acknowledge that more definitive validation of its effectiveness requires a much larger patient cohort in which the technique is utilized. Furthermore, a larger and more diverse cohort will increase the generalizability of this technique in addition to potentially providing more insights into the effects of cortical venting on healing a nonunion. Other factors that need to be further elucidated through further investigation of the technique are determining the ideal drill bit size to be used and the number of drill osteotomies created. Hypothetically, the larger the drill bit used and the higher the number of vents created will lead to more osteogenic reamings exiting the canal and surrounding the nonunion site. We use a 3.5 mm drill bit because we consider this to be of adequate size for allowing extrusion of the intramedullary reamings without substantially raising the stress riser-induced fracture risk during reaming of the canal and nail insertion. In addition, further investigation should focus on better quantifying the amount of bone graft generated with this technique.
Conclusions
Even with the multitude of treatment options available, long bone nonunion remains a challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. Our success with the described cortical venting technique performed with the exchange nailing procedure highlights its potential benefit by facilitating the dispersion of osteogenic intramedullary reamings around the nonunion site. This adjunctive technique is simple, quick, and cost-effective. Further study is needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of its effectiveness in healing a nonunion.
Acknowledgments
All cases presented in this article involving the featured adjunctive surgical technique were performed at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center under the direction of the senior author (JCD).
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Sean M. Wade, Jean-Claude G. D'Alleyrand
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Sean M. Wade, Jordan G. Tropf, Robert M. Putko
Drafting of the manuscript: Sean M. Wade, Jordan G. Tropf, Robert M. Putko
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Sean M. Wade, Jordan G. Tropf, Jean-Claude G. D'Alleyrand
Supervision: Jean-Claude G. D'Alleyrand
References
- 1.Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions. Antonova E, Le TK, Burge R, Mershon J. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Treatment of severely open tibial fractures, non-unions, and fracture-related infections with a gentamicin-coated tibial nail-clinical outcomes including quality of life analysis and psychological ICD-10-based symptom rating. Walter N, Popp D, Freigang V, Nerlich M, Alt V, Rupp M. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:270. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02411-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Outcomes of patients with nonunion after open tibial shaft fractures with or without soft tissue coverage procedures. Egol KA, Littlefield CP, Walden T, Leucht P, Levine J, Konda S. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35:0–6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Path analysis of factors for delayed healing and nonunion in 416 operatively treated tibial shaft fractures. Audigé L, Griffin D, Bhandari M, Kellam J, Rüedi TP. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:221–232. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000163836.66906.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fractures of the tibia: can their outcome be predicted? Gaston P, Will E, Elton RA, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:71–76. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The incidence of non-union following unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. el Moumni M, Leenhouts PA, ten Duis HJ, Wendt KW. Injury. 2009;40:205–208. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R. Int Orthop. 2018;42:2675–2683. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3864-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients. Nowotarski PJ, Turen CH, Brumback RJ, Scarboro JM. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=ovfta&NEWS=N&AN=00004623-198466040-00006. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:781–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. Winquist RA, Hansen ST, Jr. Jr., Clawson DK. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:529–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:177–188. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic tibial nonunions. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, OʼConnor DP, Brinker MR. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:28–35. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for delayed union and nonunion of the tibia. Templeman D, Thomas M, Varecka T, Kyle R. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;169:175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The effect of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on fracture healing. Chapman MW. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998:0–8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia: our results and an analysis of the risk factors for failure. Tsang ST, Mills LA, Frantzias J, Baren JP, Keating JF, Simpson AH. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:534–541. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.34870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Risk factors for complications after primary intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures: a cohort study of 184 consecutive patients. Bauwens PH, Malatray M, Fournier G, Rongieras F, Bertani A. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107:102877. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Motorized intramedullary nail for management of limb-length discrepancy and deformity. Rozbruch SR, Birch JG, Dahl MT, Herzenberg JE. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:403–409. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Osteotomy site venting enhances femoral bone consolidation with magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails. Gigi R, Weil Y, Amar E, Sigal A, Ovadia D, Herzenberg JE, Segev E. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Injury. 2007;38:3–6. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(08)70003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]