Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) predominantly affects women, accounting for 65% of cases. Women have a 1.3 times higher relative risk than men, with the incidence rising particularly in women aged 55–85 years. Women also have a higher prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs), especially after the age of 50 years, and are at greater risk of aneurysm growth and rupture. This study aimed to isolate the influence of sex on rupture rate, bleeding severity, functional outcomes, and complications by using a matched cohort, while also examining the impact of sex on aneurysm localization and multiplicity. Methods: We utilized a retrospectively collected database of 300 patients with 511 IAs. Inclusion criteria included the availability of clinical data and 3D angiography for semi-automatic reconstruction of IA morphology. Female patients and their IA were matched with male patients according to clinical parameters and 21 morphological characteristics using an interactive visual exploration tool for multidimensional matching. Results: Contrary to previously published results, our study found no significant sex differences in rupture rates or vasospasm rates between male and female patients. The severity of SAH, functional outcomes, and complications such as hydrocephalus were also similar in women and men. However, women exhibited a higher prevalence of multiple aneurysms and distinct localization patterns. Conclusions: This study underscores the complex role of sex in IA development and rupture. Although sex-specific biological factors influence aneurysm characteristics, they do not necessarily translate into differences in clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore these factors and their impact on aneurysm development and management.
Keywords: sex medicine, intracranial aneurysms, subarachnoid hemorrhage, case-based reasoning
1. Introduction
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) demonstrates a significant female predominance [1], with 65% of cases occurring in women [2]. With an incidence rate of 7.9 per 100,000 person-years, women face a relative risk that is 1.3 times higher than that of men [3]. This risk increases with age, particularly in women between 55 and 85 years old [4]. On average, SAH occurs around the age of 55 years [2], with women experiencing the onset slightly later than men [5]. Despite this difference in onset age, symptom presentation and severity are generally comparable between male and female patients [6,7].
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms are more common in women, especially those over the age of 50 years, who are also at greater risk of aneurysm growth and rupture [5]. They have a higher rate of multiple aneurysms [8] and the localization of their IA differs from that in men [5]. Furthermore, the IAs of the anterior communicating artery seem to be larger in women with SAH than in men [5]. The prevalence and impact of vascular risk factors on rupture risk can vary by sex. While hypertension poses a similar risk for both sexes, alcohol abuse increases the SAH risk more significantly in men [9,10], whereas smoking raises the SAH risk more in women [9,11]. Some cardiovascular risk factors, such as a high BMI, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes, may have protective effects, but a high BMI is notably associated with a reduced risk of SAH in women only [11]. The mechanisms behind these sex-specific effects remain unclear and not well studied [12], with only one hypothesis suggesting a link to reduced estrogen levels, particularly in female smokers [13].
In women over 55 years, the higher incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and unruptured IA appears to coincide with the decline in estrogen levels that occurs during menopause [5]. Early menopause is linked to a higher risk of both conditions, indicating a potential protective role of estrogen against IA formation and rupture [14,15]. Hemodynamic stress at arterial bifurcations, which are common sites for aneurysms, may cause endothelial dysfunction, leading to vascular inflammation, oxidative stress, and weakened arterial walls [16]. This dysfunction, marked by reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase, is an early step in aneurysm formation [16]. Estrogen can counteract this phenomenon by boosting nitric oxide synthase production, which is why high estrogen levels might be protective against IA formation and rupture [16].
The objective of this study was to examine the influence of sex using a matched cohort, controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and aneurysm morphology. By matching these parameters, the study aimed to isolate sex as the sole variable affecting the rate of rupture, bleeding severity, functional outcomes, and complications. Additionally, the study investigated the impact of sex on aneurysm localization and multiplicity.
2. Materials and Methods
This study has been conducted in alignment with the STROBE checklist (Supplemental material). For this analysis, we used a database that retrospectively included 300 patients with 511 IAs, all treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital in Magdeburg, Germany, between 2000 and 2018. The study adhered to the following inclusion criteria:
Availability of clinical data, particularly the sex of the affected patient.
Availability of 3D angiography allowing for semi-automatic reconstruction of the morphological characteristics of the IA, either of the ruptured IA or, in cases of multiple incidental IAs, the largest IA of the patient.
Approval for the analysis of these retrospectively collected data was given by the Ethics Committee of the Otto-von-Guericke University, which noted that all procedures were part of routine care. Following the establishment of the cohort based on the inclusion criteria, female patients and their IA (defined as the ruptured IA in SAH cases; as the singular incidental IA in cases without SAH and only one IA; and as the largest incidental IA in cases without SAH and multiple IAs) were matched with each included male patient according to several clinical parameters. Additionally, 21 semi-automatically extracted morphological parameters of the IAs were included into the matching process (Figure 1).
2.1. Data Acquisition
For this study, clinical data were retrospectively collected by thoroughly reviewing patient’s medical records, including their medical histories, medication use, and diagnostic imaging results. The analysis included the presence of cardiovascular diseases, relevant risk factors, and other notable health conditions such as cancer or severe autoimmune disorders that needed immunosuppressive therapy. To examine the natural course and therapy of an IA, detailed information was collected from imaging studies, aneurysm-specific risk factors, and evaluations of clinical outcomes after aneurysm rupture or treatment. The parameters in this study are defined using both widely accepted standards and internal clinical definitions, originally established by Swiatek et al. [17] and adjusted to meet the specific requirements of the current study. The definitions were refined to fit the context of this research. Each parameter, along with its corresponding definition and references, are detailed below:
- Pre-existing conditions and risk factors:
- ○
-
○Diabetes mellitus: documented diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes or intake of oral antidiabetics or insulin [17].
-
○Hyperlipidemia: documented diagnosis or intake of medication lowering lipid or cholesterol levels in the blood [17].
-
○Peripheral arterial disease: documented diagnosis or imaging finding [17].
-
○Heart disease: documented diagnosis of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmia, or other heart diseases [17].
-
○Ischemic stroke: documented diagnosis or imaging finding on admission [17].
-
○Obesity: documented body mass index of >30 kg/m2 [17].
- ○
- ○
- Aneurysm-specific factors:
- Clinical scores:
-
○Hunt and Hess scale: assessment of the clinical severity of the SAH on admission based on clinical presentation, ranging from minimal symptoms to severe coma and decerebrate rigidity [20].
-
○Fisher grade: assessment of SAH severity based on CT findings, ranging from no visible blood to significant intracerebral or intraventricular clots [21].
-
○Modified Rankin scale at discharge: assessment of neurological and functional disability at discharge, ranging from no symptoms to death [22].
-
○
- Complications associated with aneurysm therapy/rupture:
-
○Hydrocephalus: symptomatic enlargement of the ventricles on CT [17].
-
○Hydrocephalus treatment: placement of an external ventricular drainage or ventriculoperitoneal shunt [17].
-
○Vasospasm: vasospasm detection via transcranial doppler or angiography [17].
-
○Vasospasm treatment: treatment of vasospasm via endovascular spasmolysis or other endovascular procedures [17].
- ○
-
○
- Follow-up examinations:
-
○Follow-up duration: measured in months starting from the first admission of the patient [17].
-
○Occlusion of the aneurysm: assessed by follow-up imaging [17].
-
○Modified Rankin scale at follow-up: assessment of neurological and functional disability at follow-up, ranging from no symptoms to death [22].
-
○
2.2. Morphological Analysis
Using the processed and digitally refined 3D rotational angiography dataset, we created 3D surface models based on the method described by Saalfeld et al. (Figure 2) [24,25]. We then applied a semi-automatic segmentation of the neck curve, which allowed us to automatically extract the following 21 morphological parameters [24,25]:
Wmax: Maximum width of the aneurysm perpendicular to Hmax [25].
Hortho: Height of the aneurysm; measured vertically to the aneurysm neck [25,26,27].
Wortho: Maximum width of the aneurysm perpendicular to Hortho [25].
EI: Ellipticity index; (1−18^(1/3) V_CH^(2/3)/A_CH) [26,27].
OA 1: Ostium Area 1; surface of the aneurysm ostium [25].
OA 2: Ostium Area 2; surface of the aneurysm ostium; the neck curve projected onto a plane [25].
Alpha: Angle at point B1 describing the angle from the baseline to the dome point [25].
Beta: Angle at point B2 describing the angle from the baseline to the dome point [25].
Gamma: Angle at the aneurysm dome [25].
This approach improves the objectivity of 3D vessel analysis compared to manual measurement methods and allows for the quick and efficient analysis of large data volumes.
2.3. Matching Criteria and Cohort Matching
To mitigate the influence of risk factors other than sex on the patients’ outcome, we conducted a systematic pairing. This approach was intended to facilitate a fair comparison of rupture rate, initial clinical presentation, aneurysm-related clinical features, and outcomes between men and women with an IA. Each man in the cohort was matched with the most similar woman and her IA. As a result, 95 men were matched with 188 women.
The matching process considered various parameters: age at diagnosis, arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, peripheral arterial disease, heart diseases, previous stroke, obesity, nicotine abuse, alcohol abuse, and 21 semi-automatically reconstructed morphological parameters (Figure 1). Given the extensive number of parameters, a tool for interactive visual exploration, developed by Spitz et al. specifically for case-based reasoning of IAs, was utilized [30].
The matching parameters were entered into the interactive visual exploration tool used in our research (Figure 1). Following each successful match, the male patient designated as the ‘patient of interest’ (POI) was sequentially replaced with the next patient, and the matching process was reinitiated with the updated set of IA patients.
We employed case-based reasoning to identify the most-similar cases of women with an IA to the selected man with an IA (the POI). The tool utilized a k-nearest-neighbor-based (k-NN) classification method to evaluate case similarity. The POI (a male patient) was matched against a reference database containing all female patients with an IA. To identify the most-similar female patient, we included the k-nearest cases, setting k to 10 in this analysis.
To ensure a fair comparison, feature values were normalized using Z-score standardization. To calculate the dissimilarity between two patients, x and q, the following formula was applied:
where N is the number of features, xl represents the value of the l-th feature of patient x, and fwl denotes the weight assigned to the feature. All feature weights were set to 1 by default.
Three variants of the k-NN-based classifier were employed in the matching process. The first classifier was a standard k-NN classifier that measured the dissimilarity between the POI and all female patients in the database, identifying the 10 nearest female patients to determine the nearest neighbors. Here, each nearest neighbor was given equal weight in the classification process, irrespective of their actual proximity to the POI. The second variant improved upon the first by weighting based on actual distances, with each nearby patient receiving a weight inversely proportional to their distance. Following a similar approach, the third variant applied min–max scaling to normalize all distances within the [0, 1] range.
Spitz et al. created a visual analytics framework to facilitate the interactive exploration and analysis of data. It included integrated multiple visualization tools, including a summary panel, a directed graph panel, and an interactive heat map. By using these visual tools, users were able to evaluate and compare the IA characteristics of different patients, making it easier to identify the closest match (Figure 1) [31].
For each male patient, the 10 female patients with the greatest similarity were identified during the matching process. In 35 instances, the first match could not be assigned because it was already matched to another POI and therefore included in the analysis. In such cases, the next most suitable match was selected. Specifically, the second match was assigned in fifteen cases, the third match in ten cases, the fourth match in four cases, the fifth match in three cases, and the sixth match in another three cases (Figure 3). As a result, we conducted a statistical comparison of 95 male patients with a matched cohort of 95 female patients (Figure 3).
3. Statistical Analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics 29 was utilized for statistical analysis. Categorial variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, with Fisher’s exact test used when any cell’s expected frequency was below five. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test for normality in ordinal or continuous variables, followed by Levene’s test for analyzing variance homogeneity.
The Mann–Whitney U test was used for data that did not meet normal distribution criteria. For normally distributed data, either a t-test or Welch’s test was conducted, depending on the homogeneity of variances. The Bonferroni–Holm correction was used to correct for multiple comparisons.
4. Results
4.1. Cohort Overview
In the comprehensive cohort study involving 283 patients, a comparative analysis was performed between 95 male and 188 female patients. The findings indicated that women had a higher propensity for smoking (p = 0.031), whereas men exhibited a greater incidence of alcohol abuse (p = 0.031). There were no significant differences between the sexes concerning the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, peripheral arterial disease, heart diseases, stroke, and obesity. Age distribution was also comparable between the sexes. Additionally, the 21 morphological parameters assessed showed no sex-specific distinctions (Table 1).
Table 1.
Whole Cohort (n = 283) | Matched Cohort (n = 180) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male (n = 95) | Female (n = 188) | Statistical Analysis | Male (n = 95) | Female (n = 195) | Statistical Analysis | |
Age (mean) | 55.1 years | 55.6 years | p > 0.999 ** | 55.1 years | 53.6 years | p > 0.999 *** |
Hypertension | 70 (24.7%) | 134 (47.4%) | p > 0.999 **** | 70 (73.7%) | 70 (73.7%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Diabetes mellitus | 14 (5.0%) | 16 (5.7%) | p > 0.999 **** | 14 (14.7%) | 10 (10.5%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Hyperlipidemia | 19 (6.7%) | 29 (10.3%) | p > 0.999 **** | 19 (20%) | 18 (19.0%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Peripheral arterial disease | 4 (1.4%) | 3 (1.1%) | p > 0.999 **** | 4 (4.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Heart disease | 15 (5.3%) | 25 (8.8%) | p > 0.999 ***** | 15 (15.8%) | 13 (13.7%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Ischemic stroke | 9 (3.2%) | 11 (3.9%) | p > 0.999 **** | 9 (9.5%) | 1 (1.1%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Obesity | 33 (11.7%) | 44 (15.6%) | p > 0.999 **** | 33 (34.7%) | 26 (27.4%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Nicotine abuse | 62 (21.9%) | 85 (30.0%) | p = 0.031 **** | 62 (65.3%) | 68 (71.6%) | p > 0.999 **** |
Alcohol abuse | 23 (8.1%) | 13 (4.6%) | p = 0.031 **** | 23 (24.2%) | 11 (11.6%) | p = 0.124 **** |
Hmax (mean) | 5.9 | 5.6 | p > 0.999 * | 5.9 | 5.7 | p > 0.999 ** |
Wmax (mean) | 5.7 | 5.7 | p > 0.999 * | 5.7 | 5.9 | p > 0.999 ** |
Dmax (mean) | 7.6 | 7.3 | p > 0.999 * | 7.6 | 7.4 | p > 0.999 ** |
Hortho (mean) | 5.0 | 4.9 | p > 0.999 * | 5.0 | 5.0 | p > 0.999 ** |
Wortho (mean) | 6.6 | 6.4 | p > 0.999 * | 6.6 | 6.5 | p > 0.999 ** |
Nmax (mean) | 4.7 | 4.7 | p > 0.999 * | 4.7 | 4.7 | p > 0.999 ** |
Navg (mean) | 4.1 | 4.0 | p > 0.999 * | 4.1 | 4.0 | p > 0.999 ** |
AR 1 (mean) | 1.1 | 1.1 | p > 0.999 * | 1.1 | 1.1 | p > 0.999 * |
AR 2 (mean) | 1.2 | 1.3 | p > 0.999 * | 1.2 | 1.3 | p > 0.999 * |
EI (mean) | 0.3 | 0.3 | p > 0.999 ** | 0.3 | 0.3 | p = 0.812 ** |
NSI (mean) | 0.2 | 0.2 | p > 0.999 * | 0.2 | 0.2 | p > 0.999 *** |
UI (mean) | 0.1 | 0.1 | p > 0.999 * | 0.1 | 0.1 | p = 0.36 ** |
AA (mean) | 101.4 | 102.3 | p > 0.999 * | 101.4 | 99.3 | p > 0.999 ** |
Ostium Area 1 (mean) | 15.7 | 15.9 | p > 0.999 * | 15.6 | 14.6 | p > 0.999 ** |
Ostium Area 2 (mean) | 13.8 | 13.8 | p > 0.999 * | 13.8 | 13.1 | p > 0.999 ** |
VA (mean) | 117.7 | 141.7 | p > 0.999 * | 117.7 | 115.8 | p > 0.999 ** |
V_CH (mean) | 133.2 | 158.6 | p > 0.999 * | 133.2 | 130.5 | p > 0.999 ** |
A_CH (mean) | 119.5 | 120.6 | p > 0.999 * | 119.5 | 117.4 | p > 0.999 ** |
Alpha (mean) | 76.9 | 76.4 | p > 0.999 * | 76.9 | 78.7 | p > 0.999 * |
Beta (mean) | 61.4 | 62.6 | p > 0.999 * | 61.4 | 59.3 | p > 0.999 * |
Gamma (mean) | 41.8 | 40.9 | p > 0.999 * | 41.8 | 42.0 | p > 0.999 ** |
* t-test with Bonferroni–Holm correction; ** Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni–Holm correction; *** Welch test with Bonferroni–Holm correction; **** chi-square test with Bonferroni–Holm correction; ***** Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni–Holm correction. Bald p-values represent significant results.
Outcome analysis demonstrated no sex-related differences in aneurysm rupture rates. Among patients with ruptured aneurysms, there were no disparities in the severity of SAH between the two cohorts, as evaluated both clinically (Hunt and Hess scale) and radiologically (Fisher grade). Furthermore, functional outcomes at discharge and during follow-up, as measured by the modified Rankin scale, did not differ between male and female patients. The incidence of hydrocephalus and vasospasm was also similar across all patients. However, women presented with a higher prevalence of multiple aneurysms (p = 0.009), and aneurysm localization differed significantly between male and female patients (p = 0.009) (Figure 4). Male patients most frequently had their largest or ruptured aneurysms located at the anterior communicating artery (ACOM) (67/95; 70.5%), with other locations being uncommon. The next most frequent location was the middle cerebral artery (MCA), observed in 11 out of 95 cases (11.6%) (Figure 4). In contrast, female patients exhibited a lower proportion of ACOM aneurysms (73/188, 38.8%) and a more diverse distribution of aneurysm locations. The subsequent most common locations for female patients were the MCA (45/188, 23.9%), the internal carotid artery (ICA) (28/188, 14.9%), and the basilar artery (20/188, 10.6%) (Figure 4).
4.2. Analysis of the Matched Cohort
Following the matching process, the matched cohort consisting of 95 male and 95 female patients was re-evaluated to assess the consistency of the matching parameters between the two groups. The quality of the matching was confirmed, as no significant differences were observed in the matched clinical parameters (age, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, peripheral arterial disease, heart diseases, stroke, and obesity) or in the 21 morphological parameters between the cohorts (Table 1).
An outcome analysis was subsequently conducted on the matched cohort, focusing on endpoints such as aneurysm rupture, clinical and radiological severity of the SAH, functional outcomes at discharge and follow-up, and the incidence of complications like hydrocephalus and vasospasm. The study also examined whether the prevalence of multiple aneurysms and the distribution of aneurysm localization differed by sex. Consistent with the findings in the non-matched cohort, there was no difference in the rupture rate between women and men (Figure 5). Male and female patients with an SAH were initially equally affected in terms of clinical severity (Hunt and Hess score) and radiological severity (Fisher grade) (Figure 5), and their functional outcomes, as measured by the mRS, were similar at discharge and follow-up (Figure 6). Complications such as hydrocephalus and vasospasm occurred with equal frequency in both cohorts (Figure 5).
The results from the non-matched cohort were further confirmed, with women continuing to show a higher prevalence of multiple aneurysms even after matching (p = 0.009) (Figure 4). Additionally, the distribution of aneurysm localization remained sex specific (p = 0.009) (Figure 4). In male patients, the largest and/or ruptured aneurysm was still most frequently located at the ACOM (67/95, 70.5%), consistent with the initial cohort. However, in female patients, the distribution of aneurysm locations remained evenly spread among common sites compared to male patients after matching. The distribution also remained stable, with aneurysms located at the ACOM (34/95, 35.8%) followed by the MCA (24/95, 25.2%), the ICA (16/95, 16.8%), and the basilar artery (11/95, 11.6%) (Figure 4).
5. Discussion
Understanding sex-specific differences is crucial for developing targeted prevention and treatment strategies, particularly considering the assumed protective role of estrogen against IA formation and rupture. Using a cohort of 95 male patients matched to 95 female patients based on clinical and morphological parameters, we aimed to isolate sex as the sole variable influencing the rupture rate, bleeding severity, functional outcomes, and complications. Additionally, we explored sex differences in aneurysm localization and multiplicity between male and female patients.
Aneurysmal SAH is recognized as the stroke subtype with the highest female prevalence, comprising 65% of cases [2]. Women have a higher risk of experiencing an SAH compared to men [3,32]. This increased risk is particularly noticeable in older age groups; while the incidence of SAH is similar in younger individuals, it becomes significantly higher in women aged 55–85 years, with a relative increase ranging from 1.15 to 1.5 times [3,4].
However, our findings contrast with this established understanding. We did not observe a higher rupture rate of IA in female patients in any of our analyses. One might speculate that this could be due to the inclusion of age in the matching process, potentially resulting in a cohort younger than 55 years. Nevertheless, the rupture rate did not differ between female and male patients before and after matching, despite including women aged 30–93 years in the pre-matching analysis. The mean age of the cohorts consistently centered around 55 years, the average age for SAH onset, indicating that both younger and older patients were included. Therefore, we did not observe any differences in rupture probability between the sexes before and after adjusting the cohort for age, vascular risk factors, and aneurysm morphology. Contrary to the prevailing literature, our data indicate that sex does not affect the aneurysm rupture rate.
In our study, no sex-specific differences were observed in the severity of SAHs, assessed both clinically using the Hunt and Hess score and radiologically using the Fisher grade. This aligns with previously published studies, which found no differences in the Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, or the Fisher grade, between male and female SAH patients [6].
The impact of sex on functional outcomes following an SAH is of great importance. Previous studies found no differences in mortality and functional outcomes between male and female patients [5,33,34,35,36,37,38], a finding that our analysis confirmed both before and after matching. It is important to note that the assessment of functional outcomes may not fully capture the long-term effects of an SAH, such as cognitive deficits and (neuro-)psychiatric disorders. These potential consequences were also not adequately examined in our study. Women, in particular, often experience a greater reduction in quality of life and a higher incidence of depression following an SAH [5,39]. This underscores the need for future research to focus on sex-specific differences in patients with an IA and an SAH.
When examining typical complications following an SAH, such as the occurrence of hydrocephalus and vasospasm, previous studies have yielded mixed results. While hydrocephalus rates showed no clear differences [40], earlier data indicated that women were more likely to suffer from delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) as a result of vasospasm [5,40,41,42]. Investigations of large databases found that being female increases the risk of vasospasm, and the CONSCIOUS-1 trial also confirmed this association with higher rates of radiographic vasospasm in women [43,44]. Additionally, women aged 55–74 years are at a significantly greater risk of DCI from vasospasm compared to other age groups, a trend not seen in men [45]. In our cohort, we found no differences in the rates of hydrocephalus and vasospasm before or after matching, and consequently, no sex differences in the incidence of DCI. These findings sharply contrast with previously published data on vasospasm, underscoring the necessity for further research into the underlying mechanisms and potential sex influences on this SAH complication.
The development of multiple IAs seems to be sex specific, since women are more likely to have multiple IAs, even after adjusting for other risk factors such as smoking [8,46]. Specifically, women have a higher risk of presenting with two aneurysms (relative risk ratio 1.80) and with three or more aneurysms (relative risk ratio 3.10) [47]. These findings are consistent with those of our study, where female patients presented with more IAs even after the matching process. Furthermore, the location of the IA exhibits a distinct sex-specific pattern. Previous studies have indicated that women are more likely to have an IA along the ICA, whereas men more frequently have an IA along the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) [5,48,49]. Our study confirmed this sex-specific distribution. In male patients, the largest and/or ruptured IAs were most often located at the ACOM, consistent with prior findings. In female patients, IA locations were more evenly distributed among common sites, with the ACOM, MCA and ICA being the most frequent. These results support the established understanding of sex-specific IA localization patterns, although in our cohort, the ICA was not the most common location for an IA in women.
Sex differences in IA location and multiplicity are thought to be influenced by hormonal effects on vascular remodeling and a higher frequency of vessel wall weakness in females [5,48,49]. One study found that males have larger vessel diameters, while females experience higher wall shear stress in the MCA and ICA bifurcations, suggesting that sex-specific anatomy and hemodynamics may influence IA localization [50]. In our study, the distribution differences persisted even after matching 21 morphological parameters, indicating that factors beyond hemodynamics contribute to the sex-specific localization of IAs [51]. Further investigations are needed to fully understand these influences on aneurysm development and localization.
Our study has several limitations. First, it relies on retrospectively collected data, which may introduce selection bias. When determining the rupture status of an IA, we considered its condition at the time of presentation in our clinic and prior to any treatment. This approach means that IAs successfully treated before they could rupture were classified as unruptured in our cohort, even though they might have eventually ruptured without intervention. Our data mainly reflect the rupture rate of patients with an IA managed at our facility. However, this approach is consistent with other retrospective studies investigating the rupture risk of IAs, as prospective studies are rare due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with a SAH. Second, the matching process we employed is not a standard method. We acknowledge that due to the limited number of patients and the large number of parameters, traditional methods such as propensity score matching were not feasible. Instead, we used an innovative algorithm to match similar patients, but we recognize that this approach might not ensure the selection of “very similar” patients given the small sample size. We did not perform a formal validation, such as examining the homology of the fifth matched pair, to confirm the effectiveness of our matching algorithm, but we conducted an analysis of the matching criteria before and after matching, separated by female and male patients. Following the matching process, no discernible differences were observed between the two cohorts overall, suggesting that the cohort matching was successful and that the groups were generally comparable. Nevertheless, as mentioned earlier, this does not necessarily apply to the specific matched male and female patients. Third, while we aimed to minimize confounding variables, the matching process might not have accounted for all potential confounders that could influence functional outcomes, particularly long-term cognitive and psychiatric outcomes. This limitation is important to note because it may affect the reliability of our conclusions regarding these specific outcomes. Fourth, the study was conducted at a single center, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.
6. Conclusions
This study underscores the complex role of sex in the development and rupture of IAs. Contrary to previous findings, we found no significant sex differences in rupture rates, SAH severity, functional outcomes, or complications such as hydrocephalus and vasospasm after accounting for cardiovascular risk factors and aneurysm morphology between male and female patients. However, women exhibited a higher prevalence of multiple aneurysms and distinct localization patterns. These results suggest that although sex-specific biological factors influence aneurysm characteristics, they do not necessarily lead to differences in clinical outcomes. Further research, especially prospective, is essential to investigate these sex-specific factors and their impact on aneurysm development and management.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jpm14101038/s1, STROBE Checklist.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.M.S., I.E.S. and B.N.; Data curation, V.M.S. and C.A.D.; Formal analysis, V.M.S., A.A. and M.M.; Investigation, V.M.S., A.A. and M.M.; Methodology, L.S. and S.S.; Project administration, B.N.; Resources, K.-P.S. and A.R.; Software, L.S. and S.S.; Supervision, I.E.S.; Validation, V.M.S. and B.N.; Visualization, V.M.S. and B.N.; Writing—original draft, V.M.S. and B.N.; Writing—review and editing, A.A., C.A.D. and I.E.S. Funding acquisition, not applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committees of the Medical Faculty of the Otto-von-Guericke University (protocol code RENOVA 94/20, date of approval: 22.06.2020).
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived due to retrospective nature of the study where all data were collected as a part of routine patient care. No identifying patient data have been published.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets obtained and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Ali M., van Etten E.S., Akoudad S., Schaafsma J.D., Visser M.C., Ali M., Cordonnier C., Sandset E.C., Klijn C.J.M., Ruigrok Y.M., et al. Haemorrhagic Stroke and Brain Vascular Malformations in Women: Risk Factors and Clinical Features. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23:625–635. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00122-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Claassen J., Park S. Spontaneous Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Lancet. 2022;400:846–862. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00938-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Etminan N., Chang H.-S., Hackenberg K., de Rooij N.K., Vergouwen M.D.I., Rinkel G.J.E., Algra A. Worldwide Incidence of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage According to Region, Time Period, Blood Pressure, and Smoking Prevalence in the Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:588–597. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Rooij N.K., Linn F.H.H., van der Plas J.A., Algra A., Rinkel G.J.E. Incidence of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review with Emphasis on Region, Age, Gender and Time Trends. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2007;78:1365–1372. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.117655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fuentes A.M., Stone McGuire L., Amin-Hanjani S. Sex Differences in Cerebral Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2022;53:624–633. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Westphal L.P., Bögli S.Y., Werner J., Casagrande F., Keller E., Brandi G. Sex-Related Differences in Symptom Presentation of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. F1000Res. 2022;11:1149. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.124123.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asikainen A., Korja M., Kaprio J., Rautalin I. Sex Differences in Case Fatality of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review. Neuroepidemiology. 2024;10:1–14. doi: 10.1159/000538562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rosi Junior J., Gomes Dos Santos A., da Silva S.A., Iglesio R.F., Caldas J.G.M.P., Rabelo N.N., Teixeira M.J., Preul M.C., Spetzler R.F., Figueiredo E.G. Multiple and Mirror Intracranial Aneurysms: Study of Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2021;35:780–784. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1817849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rehman S., Sahle B.W., Chandra R.V., Dwyer M., Thrift A.G., Callisaya M., Breslin M., Phan H.T., Otahal P., Gall S. Sex Differences in Risk Factors for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2019;406:116446. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feigin V.L., Rinkel G.J.E., Lawes C.M.M., Algra A., Bennett D.A., van Gijn J., Anderson C.S. Risk Factors for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Updated Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies. Stroke. 2005;36:2773–2780. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190838.02954.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sundström J., Söderholm M., Söderberg S., Alfredsson L., Andersson M., Bellocco R., Björck M., Broberg P., Eriksson M., Eriksson M., et al. Risk Factors for Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Nationwide Cohort of 950,000 Adults. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019;48:2018–2025. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kalasapudi L., Williamson S., Shipper A.G., Motta M., Esenwa C., Otite F.O., Chaturvedi S., Morris N.A. Scoping Review of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in the Diagnosis and Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke. Neurology. 2023;101:e267–e276. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lindbohm J.V., Kaprio J., Jousilahti P., Salomaa V., Korja M. Sex, Smoking, and Risk for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:1975–1981. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ding C., Toll V., Ouyang B., Chen M. Younger Age of Menopause in Women with Cerebral Aneurysms. J. Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5:327–331. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lai P.M.R., Jimenez M., Du R., Rexrode K. Association of Reproductive Life Span and Age at Menopause With the Risk of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurology. 2022;98:e2005–e2012. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fréneau M., Baron-Menguy C., Vion A.-C., Loirand G. Why Are Women Predisposed to Intracranial Aneurysm? Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:815668. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.815668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Swiatek V.M., Amini A., Sandalcioglu Ortuño C.E., Spitz L., Hartmann K., Rashidi A., Stein K.-P., Saalfeld S., Sandalcioglu I.E., Neyazi B. Unveiling Rupture Risk and Clinical Outcomes in Midline Aneurysms: A Matched Cohort Analysis Investigating the Impact of Localization within the Anterior or Posterior Circulation. Neurosurg. Rev. 2024;47:76. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02310-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Greving J.P., Wermer M.J.H., Brown R.D., Morita A., Juvela S., Yonekura M., Ishibashi T., Torner J.C., Nakayama T., Rinkel G.J.E., et al. Development of the PHASES Score for Prediction of Risk of Rupture of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pooled Analysis of Six Prospective Cohort Studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:59–66. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jabbarli R., Dinger T.F., Darkwah Oppong M., Pierscianek D., Dammann P., Wrede K.H., Kaier K., Köhrmann M., Forsting M., Kleinschnitz C., et al. Risk Factors for and Clinical Consequences of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2018;49:848–855. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hunt W.E., Hess R.M. Surgical Risk as Related to Time of Intervention in the Repair of Intracranial Aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 1968;28:14–20. doi: 10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fisher C.M., Kistler J.P., Davis J.M. Relation of Cerebral Vasospasm to Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Visualized by Computerized Tomographic Scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1–9. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Broderick J.P., Adeoye O., Elm J. Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials. Stroke. 2017;48:2007–2012. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vergouwen M.D.I., Vermeulen M., Van Gijn J., Rinkel G.J.E., Wijdicks E.F., Muizelaar J.P., Mendelow A.D., Juvela S., Yonas H., Terbrugge K.G., et al. Definition of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage as an Outcome Event in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group. Stroke. 2010;41:2391–2395. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Saalfeld S., Berg P., Neugebauer M., Preim B. Reconstruction of 3D Surface Meshes for Blood Flow Simulations of Intracranial Aneurysms; Proceedings of the Konference für Computer- und Roboterassistierte Chirurgie (CURAC); Bremen, Germany. 17 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saalfeld S., Berg P., Niemann A., Luz M., Preim B., Beuing O. Semiautomatic Neck Curve Reconstruction for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment Based on Morphological Parameters. Int. J. CARS. 2018;13:1781–1793. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1848-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dhar S., Tremmel M., Mocco J., Kim M., Yamamoto J., Siddiqui A.H., Hopkins L.N., Meng H. Morphology Parameters for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:185–196. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Raghavan M.L., Ma B., Harbaugh R.E. Quantified Aneurysm Shape and Rupture Risk. J. Neurosurg. 2005;102:355–362. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ujiie H., Tamano Y., Sasaki K., Hori T. Is the Aspect Ratio a Reliable Index for Predicting the Rupture of a Saccular Aneurysm? Neurosurgery. 2001;48:495–502. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ujiie H., Tachibana H., Hiramatsu O., Hazel A.L., Matsumoto T., Ogasawara Y., Nakajima H., Hori T., Takakura K., Kajiya F. Effects of Size and Shape (Aspect Ratio) on the Hemodynamics of Saccular Aneurysms: A Possible Index for Surgical Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:119–129. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199907000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spitz L., Niemann U., Beuing O., Neyazi B., Sandalcioglu I.E., Preim B., Saalfeld S. Combining Visual Analytics and Case-Based Reasoning for Rupture Risk Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2020;15:1525–1535. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02217-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spitz L., Swiatek V.M., Neyazi B., Sandalcioglu I.E., Preim B., Saalfeld S. An Interactive Tool for Identifying Patient Subgroups Based on Arbitrary Characteristics for Medical Research. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2021;7:43–46. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2021-1010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cras T.Y., Bos D., Ikram M.A., Vergouwen M.D.I., Dippel D.W.J., Voortman T., Adams H.H.H., Vernooij M.W., Roozenbeek B. Determinants of the Presence and Size of Intracranial Aneurysms in the General Population: The Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2020;51:2103–2110. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Galea J.P., Dulhanty L., Patel H.C. UK and Ireland Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Database Collaborators Predictors of Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: Observations From a Multicenter Data Set. Stroke. 2017;48:2958–2963. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hamdan A., Barnes J., Mitchell P. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and the Female Sex: Analysis of Risk Factors, Aneurysm Characteristics, and Outcomes. J. Neurosurg. 2014;121:1367–1373. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jabbarli R., Reinhard M., Roelz R., Shah M., Niesen W.-D., Kaier K., Taschner C., Weyerbrock A., Van Velthoven V. Early Identification of Individuals at High Risk for Cerebral Infarction after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The BEHAVIOR Score. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2015;35:1587–1592. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lai P.M.R., Gormley W.B., Patel N., Frerichs K.U., Aziz-Sultan M.A., Du R. Age-Dependent Radiographic Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Women After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e230–e235. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Larrew T., Pryor W., Weinberg J., Webb S., Battenhouse H., Turk A.S., Chaudry I., Spiotta A., Turner R. Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Statewide Assessment of Outcome Based on Risk Factors, Aneurysm Characteristics, and Geo-Demography. J. Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:855–860. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pegoli M., Mandrekar J., Rabinstein A.A., Lanzino G. Predictors of Excellent Functional Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 2015;122:414–418. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tang W.K., Wang L., Kwok Chu Wong G., Ungvari G.S., Yasuno F., Tsoi K.K.F., Kim J.S. Depression after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review. J. Stroke. 2020;22:11–28. doi: 10.5853/jos.2019.02103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rehman S., Phan H.T., Chandra R.V., Gall S. Is Sex a Predictor for Delayed Cerebral Ischaemia (DCI) and Hydrocephalus after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (aSAH)? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2022;165:199–210. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05399-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berli S., Barbagallo M., Keller E., Esposito G., Pagnamenta A., Brandi G. Sex-Related Differences in Mortality, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:2781. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Al-Salihi M.M., Gillani S.A., Saha R., Abd Elazim A., Al-Jebur M.S., Al-Salihi Y., Ayyad A., Nattanmai P., Siddiq F., Gomez C.R., et al. Clinical Characteristics as Predictors of Early and Delayed Cerebral Infarction in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Meta-Analysis of 4527 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2024;189:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rumalla K., Lin M., Ding L., Gaddis M., Giannotta S.L., Attenello F.J., Mack W.J. Risk Factors for Cerebral Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Population-Based Study of 8346 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:e233–e241. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tam A.K.H., Ilodigwe D., Mocco J., Mayer S., Kassell N., Ruefenacht D., Schmiedek P., Weidauer S., Pasqualin A., Macdonald R.L. Impact of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome on Vasospasm, Cerebral Infarction, and Outcome after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Exploratory Analysis of CONSCIOUS-1 Database. Neurocrit. Care. 2010;13:182–189. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9402-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Darkwah Oppong M., Iannaccone A., Gembruch O., Pierscianek D., Chihi M., Dammann P., Köninger A., Müller O., Forsting M., Sure U., et al. Vasospasm-Related Complications after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Role of Patients’ Age and Sex. Acta Neurochir. 2018;160:1393–1400. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3549-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Juvela S. Risk Factors for Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms. Stroke. 2000;31:392–397. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.2.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McDowell M.M., Zhao Y., Kellner C.P., Barton S.M., Sussman E., Claassen J., Ducruet A.F., Connolly E.S. Demographic and Clinical Predictors of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 2018;128:961–968. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS162785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghods A.J., Lopes D., Chen M. Gender Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Location. Front. Neurol. 2012;3:78. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2012.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Park S.K., Kim J.M., Kim J.H., Cheong J.H., Bak K.H., Kim C.H. Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Young Adults: A Gender Comparison Study. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2008;15:389–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lindekleiv H.M., Valen-Sendstad K., Morgan M.K., Mardal K.-A., Faulder K., Magnus J.H., Waterloo K., Romner B., Ingebrigtsen T. Sex Differences in Intracranial Arterial Bifurcations. Gend. Med. 2010;7:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Neyazi B., Swiatek V.M., Skalej M., Beuing O., Stein K.-P., Hattingen J., Preim B., Berg P., Saalfeld S., Sandalcioglu I.E. Rupture Risk Assessment for Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: Why There Is No Need for Dozens of Clinical, Morphological and Hemodynamic Parameters. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2020;13:1756286420966159. doi: 10.1177/1756286420966159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets obtained and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.