Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):6139. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206139

Music-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Perioperative Anxiety and Pain—A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial

Shiv K Goel 1, Valdemir Kim 1, Jeremy Kearns 1, Daniel Sabo 1, Lynsie Zoeller 1, Coleen Conboy 2, Nicole Kelm 2, Ann E Jackovich 3, Jacques E Chelly 1,*
Editors: Benedikt Preckel, Eleni Arnaoutoglou
PMCID: PMC11508415  PMID: 39458090

Abstract

Background: Music-based intervention has been advocated as a nonpharmacologic approach for the perioperative control of pain and anxiety in surgical patients. However, its impact on patients with preoperative anxiety has not been clearly established. Our study aimed to examine the impact of music-based intervention administered before, during, and after surgery on postoperative opioid consumption and pain levels, as well as preoperative anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. We hypothesized that, compared to a control group, music-based intervention would be effective in reducing opioid requirements and mood disorders. Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Inclusion criteria isame-day or observation surgery. Exclusion criteria included American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV, use of spinal anesthesia, PROMIS Anxiety T-scores ≤ 57.4 and ≥74.1, preoperative chronic opioid use, transgender surgery, and history of drug or alcohol abuse. Music-based intervention was developed by a certified music therapist. Each patient was randomized to receive standard of care (SC) or SC plus music-based intervention before, during, and after surgery. The primary end point was postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) over 5 days following surgery using the area under the curve (AUC)Secondary end points were PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Depression scores Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time of hospital discharge, and patient satisfaction (0 = totally unsatisfied to 10 = completely satisfied). Results: A total of 75 patients were randomized to a music-based intervention (n = 33) or control (n = 42) group. Patients in the music-based intervention group consumed 56.7% less opioids than those in the control group (AUC was 2.8 in the music-based intervention group vs. 6.4 in the control group, absolute standardized mean difference (aSMD) = 0.34 (−0.17, 0.85)). No difference in pain scores was recorded between groups. Music-based intervention also reduced anxiety on postoperative day (POD)2 (aSMD = 0.38 (−0.16, 0.91)), depression on POD2 (aSMD = 0.31 (−0.23, 0.84)) and POD4 (aSMD = 0.24 (−0.29, 0.77)), and pain catastrophizing on POD1 (aSMD = 0.24 (−0.3, 0.77)). Conclusions: Our data support the use of music-based intervention to reduce postoperative opioid requirements. Music-based intervention may also reduce anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing.

Keywords: music-based intervention, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, ambulatory surgery

1. Introduction

Up to 50% of patients report experiencing a certain degree of anxiety, depression, or catastrophizing before surgery [1], and up to 80% report pain after surgery [2]. Furthermore, the presence of mood disorders, especially anxiety, has been established as a factor leading to increased postoperative pain and opioid consumption [3,4,5,6,7,8].

In surgical patients, inappropriate management of postoperative pain has been associated with several unfavorable outcomes, including increased morbidity, the development of chronic pain, delayed surgical recovery, and persistence of opioid consumption and opioid use disorder [9]. The current recommended approach to perioperative pain management is multimodal analgesia, which includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, regional nerve blocks, and opioids [10]. A study of 36,177 adults in the US in 2017 reported an approximate 6% incidence of new persistent opioid use after minor and major surgeries. The same study identified anxiety as a significant risk factor [11]. Therefore, considerations have been given to the use of nonpharmacological complementary approaches as a way to control preoperative mood disorders and therefore improve pain control [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

Among nonpharmacologic approaches to the perioperative management of pain and mood disorders, music-based intervention is a method that could be particularly valuable in health care, as it is inexpensive, has no known side effects, and does not require patients to have previous formal experience with music. Music-based interventions are used in health care to help reach various health-promoting goals and are provided by certified music therapists, health care professionals, musicians, and others. Music-based interventions where patients listen to pre-recorded music are a passive method often used by music therapists to relax a patient, regulate activity and tension, and positively influence the patient’s mood and motivation. This is why a licensed music therapist is needed to effectively establish a therapeutic relationship between the music and the patient, while also preventing side effects like anxiety. The current literature suggests that music-based intervention is an effective approach to controlling pain and anxiety [16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Although a meta-analysis reported positive effects of music-based intervention, the high degree of heterogeneity in study designs has led to inconsistent conclusions.

Our study was designed to examine the impact of music-based intervention administered before, during, and after surgery on postoperative opioid consumption and pain levels, as well as preoperative anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. This study also evaluated patient satisfaction and recovery outcomes. We hypothesized that, compared to a control group (standard of care), the use of music-based intervention would be effective in reducing opioid consumption in patients with preoperative anxiety and that a correlation exists between opioid consumption and anxiety.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This study was a single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Before subject recruitment was initiated, the study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (STUDY21110130) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05263635).

The inclusion criteria were patients having same-day surgery including breast surgeries, open inguinal hernia repairs, and laparoscopic or robotic surgeries. The patients received a single nerve block and underwent either general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. The patients’ ages ranged from 18 to 80 years old; their American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical statuses were I, II, or III; and they presented moderate anxiety (PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8 questionnaire T scores ≥ 57.4 and ≤74.1).

The exclusion criteria were ASA physical status IV, use of spinal anesthesia, significant anxiety with PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8 T-score of <57.4 or higher than 74.1, preoperative chronic use of opioids, and history of drug or alcohol abuse.

2.2. Enrollment Procedures

In the same-day surgery unit, a trained research coordinator approached patients who met the eligibility criteria at least two hours before surgery. Patients interested in participating were asked to sign a HIPAA-compliant informed consent document. After providing written informed consent, each patient was asked to complete the PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8 questionnaire. Patients with mild to moderate anxiety (T-scores ≥ 57.4 and ≤74.1) [27] were randomized to either a group who would receive music-based intervention or a control group (no music-based intervention) using a computer-generated randomization scheduled. Baseline data before randomization also included medical history, pain rated using a verbal scale (0 = no pain to 10 = the worst possible pain), and pain medication use (including opioids). In addition, each patient was also asked to complete PROMIS Emotional Distress–Depression Short Form 8 (PROMIS Depression) and a Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire [28].

Computer-generated, blocked randomization was performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Information about the allocation was stored in opaque envelopes.

2.3. Music-Based Intervention

The music-based intervention was developed by a certified music therapist (license registered by the medical board of Pennsylvania) and was based on flowing rhythm approximately 60–80 beats/minute, and was played by string instruments [29,30]. Each patient was offered to choose between classical, jazz, piano, guitar, or lo-fi music (music with a laid-back and chilled-out vibe). Lo-fi music often features slow tempos, simple melodies, and a repetitive nature that allows the listener to relax and unwind. Lo-fi music also heavily relies on the use of samples, particularly from vinyl records, to create its signature sound (examples can be found at soundscapehq.com). The music included in each category is listed in Appendix A. An MP3 player connected to headphones played the music-based intervention at a volume of approximately 45 decibels during three sessions: in the preoperative area, immediately following induction of anesthesia in the operating room, and in the post-anesthesia care unit (when subjects were awake and responsive).

2.4. Anesthesia

Surgery was performed under sedation (breast surgery, inguinal hernia repair) or general anesthesia. Prior to surgery, peripheral nerve blocks were performed, either a paravertebral nerve block in patients undergoing breast surgery [31,32] or quadratus lumborum approach (QL 2) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery [33]. The nerve blocks were performed prior to surgery in the same surgery units by a member of the acute interventional pain service. Furthermore, no opioids were administered prior to anesthesia and surgery.

2.5. Follow-Up

In the recovery room, postoperative pain level, analgesics, nausea, and vomiting were recorded until discharge. Prior to discharge, each patient was also asked to complete satisfaction questionnaires. After discharge, each patient was asked to complete questionnaires and report mood symptoms and medication use daily for the first five postoperative days (PODs). Specifically, they were instructed to fill out the PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Depression, and PCS surveys and record their levels of pain, anxiety, and pain medication use over the previous 24 h. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) was used to collect all the information.

2.6. Outcome Measurements

The primary end point was opioid consumption. Secondary end points included PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Depression, PROMIS sleep interference, and pain catastrophizing scores; pain and opioid consumption on PODs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; total opioid consumption over the first 30 days; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); time of hospital discharge; and patient satisfaction scores (0 = totally unsatisfied to 10 = completely satisfied).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated using means and standard deviations for continuous data and counts and percentages for categorical data. Non-normal continuous data were described using medians and interquartile ranges. Differences between treatment groups prior to starting the treatment were tested on continuous data using T-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests, and categorical differences using Chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests. Missing values were removed from all denominators and statistical testing. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Differences between means of the treatment vs. the control group were assessed using the absolute standardized mean difference (aSMD). An aSMD ≥ 0.2 indicates that the standardized means of these two groups are different [33,34]. R software (version 4.3.1, R Core Team, 2023) was used for data management and analysis. The TOSTER package was used to calculate SMDs, DescTools was used to calculate AUCs, and halfmoon was used to construct love plots.

The primary outcome was postoperative (POD) oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) over 5 days following surgery by calculating area under the curves (AUCs) using the trapezoid method. Power analysis indicated that 30 patients per group were required to establish a difference of 30% between the groups. Percent differences of medians and aSMDs were calculated to compare between-group differences. Love plots over time were created to visualize aSMDs over PODs. Secondary outcomes included pain over 5 days following surgery by calculating area under the curves (AUCs) using the trapezoid method, postoperative opioid consumption on POD 1–5, patient’s satisfaction surveys, postoperative length of stay, and level of nausea were compared using aSMDs and percentage differences of medians. Spearman correlations were calculated between total OME in the postoperative period in the hospital, and depression, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety on each POD.

aSMDs ≥ 0.2 were considered our lower bound of effect sizes [34,35]. R software (version 4.3.1, R Core Team, 2023) was used for data management and analysis. The TOSTER package was used to calculate SMDs, DescTools was used to calculate AUCs, and halfmoon was used to construct love plots.

3. Results

A total of 749 patients were screened from May 2022 to August 2023. We found 493 patients to be eligible; 173 gave informed consent, and 93 patients were considered screen failures because their PROMIS Anxiety T-scores were <57.4 or >74.1. Consequently, 80 patients were randomized. After randomization, five patients were found to be ineligible and removed from the final analysis: one patient participated in another study, one patient had a history of substance abuse, and three patients had a history of chronic opioid use. Out of the 75 remaining patients, 33 were randomized to the music-based intervention group and 42 to the control group. During the follow-up phase in the music-based intervention group, one patient was lost to follow-up, two patients withdrew from the study, and six were excluded due to postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) and having their procedure converted from laparoscopic to open. In the control group, one patient was lost to follow-up, and one patient was transferred to the ICU after surgery (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CONSORT flow diagram.

Table 1 presents patients’ demographics, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, weight, height, body mass index, baseline PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Depression, and PCS scores, type of music being played, and the percentage of patients who filled their opioid prescription overall and in each group. These data indicated no observed statistical differences among groups at baseline.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants.

Variable Total
(n = 64)
Control
(n = 40)
Treatment
(n = 24)
p Value
Age, median (IQR) 54 (42.25–63) 56 (42.2–61.2) 49.5 (41.5–66.2) 0.961
Sex, No. (%) 0.778
Female 45 (70.3%) 29 (72%) 16 (67%)
Male 19 (29.7%) 11 (28%) 8 (33%)
Race, No. (%) 0.109
Asian 3 (4.7%) 0 (0%) 3 (12%)
Black or African American 11 (17.2%) 7 (18%) 4 (17%)
White 48 (75%) 31 (78%) 17 (71%)
Other, not specified 2 (3.1%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%)
Hispanic, No. (%) 0.137
No 61 (95.3%) 39 (98%) 22 (92%)
Yes 2 (3.1%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%)
Not specified 1 (1.6%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)
Weight, median (95% CI) in kg 79.5 (67.5–98) 84 (67.5–99.5) 76 (67.7–97.7) 0.608
Height, median (95% CI) in cm 169 (160–175) 170 (160–175.1) 168 (159.4–173) 0.404
BMI, median in kg/m2 (95% CIU in kg/m2) 28.6 (24.8–33.5) 29.2 (24.6–33.8) 27.9 (52.2–32.9) 0.906
Music genre, No. (%)
Classical 3 (4.7%) 3 (12%)
Guitar 8 (12.5%) 8 (33%)
Jazz 9 (14.1%) 9 (38%)
Lo-Fi 2 (3.1%) 2 (8%)
Piano 2 (3.1%) 2 (8%)
Opioid prescriptions filled, No. (%)
No 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Yes 33 (100%) 21 (100%) 12 (100%)
Baseline PROMIS Anxiety T-score, median (95% CI) 62.5 (59.4–66.6) 62.5 (59.4–64.8) 63.5 (59.4–69) 0.452
Baseline PROMIS Depression T-score, median (95% CI 53.85 (49.8–57.9) 54.3 (49.8–57.9) 53.4 (50.9–57.5) 0.945
Baseline PCS score, median (95% CI) 14 (6.75–21.25) 16 (8–21.2) 12.5 (4–21.2) 0.532

CI (confident interval); BMI—body mass index; PCS—Pain Catastrophizing

Table 2 presents the types of surgery performed on patients included in the study. There were no observed significant differences between the two groups.

Table 2.

Types of surgical interventions among study participants.

Type of Surgery Total
(n = 64)
Control
(n = 40)
Treatment
(n = 24)
p Value
Mastectomy 9 (14.1%) 5 (12.5%) 4 (16.7%) 0.953
Breast reconstruction 17 (26.6%) 12 (30%) 5 (20.8%)
Breast fat graft 2 (3.1%) 1 (2.5%) 1 (4.2%)
Laparoscopic prostatectomy 12 (18.8%) 7 (17.5%) 5 (20.8%)
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 15 (23.4%) 10 (25%) 5 (20.8%)
Laparoscopic appendectomy 3 (4.7%) 2 (5%) 1 (4.2%)
Robotic inguinal hernia repair 3 (4.7%) 2 (5%) 1 (4.2%)
Other laparoscopic procedures 3 (4.7%) 1 (2.5%) 2 (8.3%)

Primary end point: As presented in Table 3 and Figure 2, patients in the intervention music therapy group consumed 56.7% less opioids than those in the control group (median 2.8 in intervention music therapy group vs. 6.4 control group, aSMD = 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (−0.17, 0.85)). While the estimated aSMD displayed an effect size ≥ 0.2, we noted that the CI contained zero. The greatest difference in opioid consumption was recorded on POD1 (0.51, (−0.01, 1.02)) and decreased after that. On POD5, opioid aSMD was 0.21 (−0.32, 0.73).

Table 3.

Pain score and opioid consumption AUC in the intervention music therapy group vs. those in the control group.

Variable Control
(n = 40)
Treatment
(n = 24)
% Difference aSMD (95% CI)
Pain score
Median AUC for POD 1–5
12.5 13.0 4% 0.12 (−0.4, 0.64)
Opioid use in OME
Median AUC for POD 1–5
6.4 2.8 −56.7% 0.34 * (−0.17, 0.85)

aSMD—absolute standardized mean difference; AUC—area under the curve; CI—confidence interval; OME—oral morphine equivalent; POD—postoperative day; * aSMD ≥ 0.2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

aSMD love plot for OME and pain in the intervention music therapy group vs. the control group. aSMD—absolute standardized mean difference; OME—oral morphine equivalent; POD—postoperative day. The blue line represents a reference for aSMD = 0.2.

Secondary end point: The greatest difference in opioid consumption was recorded on POD1 (0.51, (−0.01, 1.02)) and decreased after that. On POD5, opioid aSMD was 0.21 (−0.32, 0.73). Pain scores using AUCs from POD1 and POD5 showed no difference between the groups (13.0 vs. 12.5; 0.12 (−0.4, 0.64)). Furthermore, our data demonstrated fluctuating effects of intervention music therapy on anxiety (POD2 0.38 (−0.16, 0.91)), depression (POD2 0.31 (−0.23, 0.84) and POD4 0.24 (−0.29, 0.77)), and pain catastrophizing (POD1 0.24 (−0.3, 0.77)). Table 4 presents the frequency of PONV, satisfaction scores, and length of hospital stay. aSMD sizes were small for satisfaction scores, frequency of PONV, and length of hospital stay (3.6 vs. 4.1 h; 0.11 (−0.4, 0.62)). Correlations between total post-op OME, depression, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety were negligible, with an absolute upper bound of 0.12.

Table 4.

Secondary outcome measures in the intervention music therapy group vs. the control group.

Variable Control
(n = 40)
Treatment
(n = 24)
% Difference aSMD (95% CI)
Satisfaction questionnaire score, median 95% CI)) 10 (10–10) 10 (10–10) 0% 0.05 (−0.48, 0.58)
Time to hospital discharge, median in hours (95% CI) 4.1 (2.8–6.7) 3.6 (2.9–6) −11.3% 0.11 (−0.4, 0.62)
Level of nausea, median (95% CI 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) - 0.22 (−0.29, 0.73)

aSMD—absolute standardized mean difference; CI—confidence interval.

Figure 3 presents the difference in PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Depression, and PCS scores over five days based on aSMD and pain catastrophizing.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

aSMD love plot for PROMIS and PCS scores in the intervention music therapy group vs. the control group. aSMD—absolute standardized mean difference; POD—postoperative day; PCS—Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The blue line represents a reference for aSMD = 0.2.

Table 4 presents the frequency of PONV, satisfaction scores, and length of hospital stay. aSMD sizes indicated no difference between the group for satisfaction scores, frequency of PONV, and length of hospital stay (3.6 vs. 4.1 h; 0.11 (−0.4, 0.62)). Finally, correlations between total post-op OME, depression, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety were negligible, with an absolute upper bound of 0.12.

4. Discussion

In contrast to other published studies [16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], our study focused on the potential benefits of music-based intervention in patients with anxiety prior to surgery. Our data indicates that 46% of the patients included in this study had anxiety scores within the inclusion criteria. This finding is within the percentage of preoperative anxiety reported by Friedrich. In this context, females have been found to have higher levels of preoperative anxiety [36].

Our data suggest that music-based intervention may be an effective technique to reduce opioid requirements in patients undergoing minor surgery. Total opioid consumption for patients in the music-based intervention group was 56.7% lower than that for patients in the control group. The effect was the highest on POD1. Our data also suggest that by POD5, the difference between the groups was minimal (Figure 2), suggesting that in the context of our protocol (administrating music-based intervention prior to, during, and immediately after surgery), the effects of music-based intervention lasted four days. This short-lasting effect of music-based intervention may also be due to the fact that the role of music-based intervention was studied in patients undergoing minor surgery, where pain is expected to last no more than three to four days. [37]. Furthermore, while the aSMD indicated a noteworthy effect of 0.34, the associated 95% CIs (−0.17, 0.85) showed a large difference between the individual effects of music-based intervention on opioid consumption. Postoperative opioid consumption is multifactorial, including not only pain associated with the surgery, but also individual factors such as anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing.

The music protocol used in this study was developed by a licensed music therapist. Patients in this study were offered a choice of classical, jazz, piano, guitar, and lo-fi music. Our protocol is a significant deviation from those in other published studies on the use of music-based intervention in surgical patients. While it is uncertain whether our approach should serve as a reference for future studies, theoretically, involving a certified music therapist could enhance the benefits of music-based intervention in surgical patients.

Music-based intervention has been used in patients undergoing several types of surgery, including ambulatory and inpatient surgery, cancer and cardiac surgery, and total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty. In most cases, music-based intervention has been administered after surgery to treat anxiety and depression and, in a limited number of cases, to reduce post-surgical pain. Juhl et al. (2019) [38] suggested that the mechanism of action of music-based intervention is multifactorial (cognitive function, emotion, and neurobiology). Our data provide additional evidence that music-based intervention is an interesting technique to not only decrease the anxiety and depression associated with surgery, but also decrease opioid requirements in the first five days following surgery. In our study, however, music-based intervention had minimal effects on pain.

Despite the reduction in opioid consumption, there was a lack of differences between the medians of the pain scores, most likely related to the intrinsic variability of the pain scores within each group that is reflected by the large aSMD 95% CI (−0.4, 0.64) and the relatively limited extent of the surgeries that were performed. Although we reported a reduction in both pain levels and postoperative opioid consumption associated with the use of aromatherapy and the NeuroCuple™ device [13,15], this absence of correlation between pain and total opioid consumption can be seen in other studies [39,40]. This absence of correlation might also be related to the temporal independence between the opioid intake and pain level recorded each day.

Secondary outcomes, including patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and PONV, were not substantially different between the groups. While music-based intervention may improve some aspects of recovery (such as reducing opioid consumption), it may not be sufficient to influence the overall length of hospital stay or PONV. Other factors, such as type of surgery, type of anesthesia, and the patient’s medical history, may be more determinant factors controlling these outcomes.

Our data suggest that music-based intervention reduced anxiety on POD2, depression on POD2 and POD4, and pain catastrophizing on POD1. While music-based intervention can provide temporary relief, it might be insufficient to consistently affect the emotional and cognitive aspects of these parameters during POD1-POD5, or PROMIS/PCS questionnaires are not designed to capture short-term mood changes. As for depression, the inconsistent effects could also be attributed to the low baseline scores in both treatment groups, showing no further decrease in already low scores.

Several limitations should be noted in our study. First, the sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, although each patient was allowed to choose between five playlists with music from various genres, the researcher-selected music may not have covered the type of music preferred by a given patient. Lastly, the unequal distribution of patients between the placebo and the treatment groups may have affected the recorded overall responses between the groups.

Dang et al. [16] reported that the benefits of a combination of aromatherapy and music-based intervention were not greater than the benefits of either therapy alone. This suggests that before adding a combination of complementary techniques to a postoperative protocol to manage anxiety and depression in surgical patients, it is necessary to establish the benefit of that combination. This applies to the use of psychoeducation programs [41,42], acupuncture [43], auriculotherapy [44,45], hypnosis [46], virtual reality [47], aromatherapy [13], nanotechnology [15], and other potential complementary techniques, especially when the technique involves significant training, time, and cost, such as with acupuncture, auriculotherapy, and biofeedback.

In contrast to other published studies [16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], our study focused on the potential benefits of music-based intervention in patients with anxiety prior to surgery. Our data indicate that 46% of patients in this study presented anxiety scores within the inclusion criteria. In this context, females have been found to have lower levels of preoperative anxiety [48].

Our study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of music-based intervention into perioperative care protocols. Cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation make music-based intervention an attractive option for enhancing patient outcomes. However, variability in the observed effects highlights the need for further research to identify the patient populations that may benefit the most from this intervention.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides evidence to support the effectiveness of music-based intervention as a nonpharmacologic technique to reduce opioid consumption in the postoperative period. There was also a temporary effect on mood disorders. Future studies are necessary to confirm this concept. Further studies should include a larger sample size, assess whether or not music-based intervention should extend beyond the immediate perioperative period, and be applicable to surgeries beyond minor surgeries.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Christine Burr for editing this manuscript and Jasmin Brown for her administrative assistance.

Appendix A

Table A1.

Music by type (N/A = not available).

Genre Song Composer Artist
CLASSICAL Piano Concerto No. 5 in E-Flat Major, Op. 73 Ludwig van Beethoven Vienna Philharmonic
The Four Seasons Winter, op. 8/4, II Largo Antonio Vivaldi Stuttgart Chamber Orchestra
Piano Concerto No 21 in C Major, K. 467 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Numberg Symphony Orchestra
Romance for Violin and Orchestra in F Major, Op 50 Ludwig van Beethoven Badische Staatskapelle
Suite for Orchestra No. 3 in D Major Johann Sebastian Bach Mainz Chamber Orchestra
L’estro Armonico No. 8 in A minor, Op. 3 Antonio Vivaldi Stuttgart Chamber Orchestra
Andagio for Strings (from Strings Quartet, Op 11) Samuel Barber New Zealand Symphony Orchestra
Ellen’s Song III (“Ave Maria”), D. 839 (Op 52/6) Franz Schubert Aaron Rosand & Eileen Flissier
Symphony No..6 in B Minor, Op. 74 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra
Symphony No. 6 in F Major, Op 68 Ludwig van Beethoven London Symphony Orchestra
Piano Concerto No. 2 in C Minor, Op 18 Sergei Rachmaninoff Moscow RTV
Piano Concerto No. 1 in E minor, Op 11 Frederic Chopin Hamburg Symphony Orchestra
Violin Concerto in D Major, Op 35 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky Orchestra of Radio Luxemburg
Violin Concerto in D Minor for 2 Violins and Orchestra Johann Sebastian Bach Mainz Chamber Orchestra
Symphony No 5 in C-Sharp Minor: IV. Adagietto Gustav Mahler London Symphony Orchestra
Songs Without Words, Op 62: Spring Song Felix Mendelssohn Hans Kalafusz & Klaus von Wildemann
Concerto No. 20 in D Minor for Piano and Orchestra Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Berlin Symphony Orchestra
Concerto No. 3 in G Major for Violin and Orchestra Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Dalibor Brazda
Carnival of the Animals: XIII The Swan Camille Saint-Saens Stockholm Chamber Duo
Thais Meditation (Andante Religioso) Jules Massenet Royal Philharmonic Orchestra
String Quartet No 2 in D Major: Notturno Alexander Borodin Lucerne String Quartet
Holberg Suite in G Major, Op 40: Sarabande Edvard Grieg Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra
Suite Bergamasque, L 75: Clair de lune Claude Debussy Mostar Symphony Orchestra
PIANO Suite Bergamasque: III. Clair de Lune Claude Debussy Peter Frankl
Reverie, for Piano, L. 68 Claude Debussy Peter Frankl
Scenes from childhood, Op 15: VII Traumerei Robert Schumann Peter Schmalfuss
12 Etudes, Op. 10: No. 3 in E major Frederic Chopin Abbey Simon
Piano Concerto No 2 in C Minor, Op 18 Sergei Rachmaninoff Moscow RTV
Piano Concerto No 1 in E Minor, Op. 11 Frederic Chopin Hamburg Symphony Orchestra
Piano Concerto No. 5 in E-Flat Major, Op. 73 Ludwig van Beethoven Vienna Philharmonic
3 Gymnopedies: Gymnopedie No 1 Erik Satie Frank Glazer
Melodies for Piano, Op 3: No 1 Melody In F Anton Rubinstein Michael Ponti
Waltzes, Op 39: No. 15 in A major Johannes Brahms Alfred Bredela dn Walter Klien
Sonata for piano No. 12 in F Major, K 332 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Carmen Piazzini
Nocturnes, Op. 27, No. 2 in D-flat major Frederic Chopin Abby Simon
Concerto No. 20 in D Minor for Piano and Orchestra Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Berlin Symphony
12 Preludes, Book 1, L 117 Claude Debussy Peter Schmalfuss
Trois Gymnopedies: Gynopedie No. 1 Erik Satie Frank Glazer
Aria and 30 Variations Johann Sebastain Bach Henrik Mawe
Amazing Grace John Newton William Walker Relaxing Piano
Sekai no Shazo kara Nakamura Hachidai Relaxing Piano
Amaratine Enya Roma Ryan Relaxing Piano
Music Room After School Gonititi Masayo Relaxing Piano
My Favorite Things/Sound of Music Rodgers Hammerstein Relaxing Piano
Give Me a Wing Kunihiko Murai Relaxing Piano
Reprise/Spirited Away Joe Hisaishi Relaxing Piano
ALWAYS—Sunset on Third Street Naoki Sato Relaxing Piano
You Raise Me Up Brendan Graham Rolf Lovland Relaxing Piano
Comme au Premier Jour Ande Gagnon Doug Gamely Relaxing Piano
Etupirka Taro Hakase Relaxing Piano
TAKUMI Masa Takumi Relaxing Piano
KAZABUE Michiru Oshima Relaxing Piano
JIN—Main Title Yuu Takami Relaxing Piano
Let It Go/Frozen Kristen Anderson Lopez Robert Lopez Relaxing Piano
Nuovo Cinema Paradiso Tema D’Amore Andrea Morricone Ennio Morricone Relaxing Piano
Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence Ryuichi Sakomoto Relaxing Piano
Kaze no Uta Toshihiko Sahashi Relaxing Piano
Flowers Will Bloom Yoko Kanno Relaxing Piano
Time to Say Good-Bye Francesco Sartori. Lyricist: Frank Peterson. Lucio Quarantotto Relaxing Piano
Lost Jacky Terrasson Wallace Roney
GUITAR Gymnopedie No. 1 Erik Satie Robert Lunn
Clair de Lune Claude Debussy Tariq Harb
Cannon in D Johann Pachelbel Ines Thome
Gymnopedie No. 3 Erik Satie Micharl Christian Durrant
Jeux Interdits (Forbidden Games) Narciso Yepes Paco Hernandes
Guitar Concerto de Aranjuez Rodrigo Joaguin Rodrigo Julian Bream
Air Jean Baptiste Lully Jean Lully Richard Mollenbeek
Pavane Faure N/A Pablo Segovia Gardel
Cavatina (Deer Hunter Theme) Stanky Myers Mason Wilson
Summertime Gershwin Heywaard Kuhns Julio Deranjo
Dance of the Miller Manuelde Falla Juan Iniesta
Gran Vals Francisco Tarrega Hegovia Juanrez
Una Furtiva Lagrima Gaetano Donizetti Pablo Segovia Gardel
Gymnpedie Erik Satie Francisco Tores
Malaguena Ernesto Lecuona Gypsy Queens
El Mariachi (Once Upon a time in Mexico) Robert Rodriguez Leo Sanchez
Moonlight Sonata Beethoven Rodrigo Escoba
Valse Criollo Antonio Lauro Neo Yepes
Bolero Ravel Gipsy Rayes
Granada (Suite Espanola) Isaac Albeniz Ricardo Juarez
Prelude, No. 5 Heitor Villa Lobos Rodrigo Escoba
Albinoni arr Giazotto: Adagio in G Minor Tsomaso Albinoni & Remo Giazotto Dominic Miller, Budapest Film Orchestra
Myers: Cavatina (The Deer Hunter) Stanley Myers Goran Sollscher
Guitar Concerto in D—Largo Antonio Vivaldi Eduardo Fernandez
Cello Suite No. 1—Prelude Johann Sebastian Bach John Williams
Apres un reve Gabriel Faure Steve Erquiaga
Pavane pour une infante defunte Maurice Ravel Steve Erquiaga
Cello Suite No. 3—Courante Johann Sebastian Bach Pepe Romero
Castillos de Espana—Torija Federico Moreno torroba Andres Segovia
Prelude No. 1 Heitor Villa-Lobos Julian Bream
Andaluza Enrique Granados Pepe Romero & Celine Romero
Suite espanola—Granada Isaac Albeniz Pepe Romero
Bachianas brasileiras No. 5, W. 389 Heitor Villa-Lobos Aleandre Lagoya
Cello Concerto No.6 Andante Luigi Boccherini Andres Segovia
2 Temas Populares Cubanos Leo Brouwer Eduardo Fernandez
Cantana No 156—Arioso Johann Sebastian Bach Steve Erquiaga
Romane d’amour Anonymous goran Sollscher
Mass in B Minor—Qui Tollis Johann Sebastian Bach Dominic Miller, Budapest Film Orchestra
Twin Peaks Theme Angelo Badalamenti Henrik Janson
Mad World Roland Orzabal Sergei Baronin
Be Over Ay Shazam Footer John Hanks
Cornfield Chase Hans Zimmer Alex Gibson Moldoni
Chi Mai Ennio Morricon Henrik Janson
Bibo No Aozora Ryichi Sakomoto Henrik Janson
Memories (Top Gun) Harold Falter-Meyer Christopher Varela
Deep Forest Omar Franco Varela Christopher Varela
Adagio Henrik Janson Richard Mollenbeck
Gymnopedie Erik Satie Richard Mollenbeck
Hills and Horizons Evans, Rolls, Leslie and Barlow John Hanks
Lost and Found William Puchot John Hanks
Pavane, Op. 50 Fauve Marcel Dopuis
New Moon (The Meadow) Alexandre Desplat Miranda Boumedin
Ave Nocturne John Field John A. Nilson
Theme from Schindler’s List John Williams Moldoni
Pathetique Sonata Beethoven Marcel Dopuis
Air on a G String J. S. Bach Richard Mollenbeck
Carrousel Rogers/Hammerstein N/A John A. Nilson
In Trutina Carl Orff Marcel Dopuis
May it Be Enya/Ryan Sergei Baronin
Sweden Getz/Hallberg Sergei Baronin
River Flows in You Yiruma Miranda Boumedin
In My Spanish Hacienda Rodrigo Sergio Miguel
The Ludlows J. Horner Christopher Varela
Vivaldino A. Carrilho John A. Nilson
Braids Paterson Enrico Carmona
Transformation E Menken Enrico Carmona
JAZZ Movement I, Pt. I Bob Belden and Suzanne Severini Classical Jazz Quartet
Movement I, Pt. III Bob Belden and Suzanne Severini Classical Jazz Quartet
Movement I, Pt. IV Bob Belden and Suzanne Severini Classical Jazz Quartet
Movement II, Pt. II Bob Belden and Suzanne Severini Classical Jazz Quartet
Round Midnight Thelonious Monk and Cootie Williams Hank Jones
Yesterdays Jerome Kern Otto Harbach Larry Coryell
Into the Shadows John Fedchock James Moody
Second Time Around Sammy Cahn-Jimmy Van Heusen Donald Brown
Yvette Gigi Gryce Darrell Grant
Sunny Bobby Hebb Les McCann
Sweet & Lovely Gus Arnheim, Charles N. Daniels and Harry Tobias Sonny Stitt
A Flower Kenny Barron Kenny Barron
My Man’s Gone Now George Gershwin DuBose Heyward Mulgrew Miller
When You Wish Upon a Star Leigh Harline Ned Washington Eliane Elias
Nature Boy Eden Ahbez The Drummonds
This Guy’s In Love with You Burt Bacharach Hal David Cedar Walton
Lover Man Jimmy Davis, Roger Ramirez, James Sherman. Sonny Stitt
You Better Go Now Irvin Graham Bix Reichwer Red Garland
Willow Weep For Me Ann Ronel Cannonball Adderley
Love Walked In George Gershwin Errol Garner
Summertime George Gershwin Duke Jordan
Moonlight in Vermont John Blackburn Karl Suexxdorf Marian McPartland
When Darkeness Falls George Shearing George Shearing
Solace S. Joplin Billy Taylor
Softly as in a Morning Sunrise Romberg/Hammerstein The modern Jazz Quartet
Blue in Green Davis/Evans Miles Davis
Flamenco Sketches Davis/Evans Miles Davis
Fran-Dance Davis Miles Davis
Stella By Starlight Young/Washington Miles Davis
The Waking Hours A. Holzwarth Jeff Bailey
Sweet Sadness Clary/Bottini Jeff Bailey
The Only One for Me McKnight Jeff Bailey
Precious Few Kent Jeff Bailey
Beauty Marks S. Grey Jeff Bailey
Make Believe Waltz Morse/Drislane Jeff Bailey
Memories E. Blake Jeff Bailey
In This Place T. Thompson Jeff Bailey
Open Road Williamson Jeff Bailey
After Hours A. Parrish Jeff Bailey
Lullaby for Lovers B. Kaempfert Jeff Bailey
LO-FI Dreamy Vibe Loonight, clava & kazuna Loonight, clava & kazuna
Good Night Loonight, clava & kazuna Loonight, clava & kazuna
Peaceful Loonight, clava & kazuna Loonight, clava & kazuna
Sleepy Tune Loonight, clava & kazuna Loonight, clava & kazuna
Sunset Love Loonight, clava & kazuna Loonight, clava & kazuna
Blue Bottle Blue Tumbler Lofi Blue Tumb
Starbucks LofiGuy Lofi LofiGuy
Taylor Coffee LofiGuy Lofi LofiGuy
MONACLE Bruns Lofi Bruns
% Arabica Lost Tribe Lofi Lost Tribe
Intelligentsia LofiGuy Lofi LofiGuy
TERAROSA LofiGuy Lofi LofiGuy
DOUTOR LofiGuy Lofi LofiGuy
Daydreams Pink Marble Lofi Pink Marble
Walk in the Blue Mountains Kitsune Lofi Kitsune
Endless LofiBeats Lofi LofiBeats
Atmosphere L. Walther Lofi L. Walther
Nostalgia Glimlip Sleepermane Lofi Glimlip Sleepermane
Revenant Medieval Lofi Lofi Medieval Lofi
Autumn Breeze Annata A.I./Zen Vibes Lofi Annata A.I./Zen Vibes
Inception Hans Zimmer Lofi Ender Guney
Chillin in my House BLK (Kor) Lofi Antique Sound Lab
Coffee and Cake ILLIN Lofi Antique Sound Lab
Song for Lazy bone ILLIN Lofi Antique Sound Lab
Smoking After Lunch ILLIN Lofi Antique Sound Lab
Sunset Lukrembo Lofi Lukrembo
Ocean Sunset chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato
Campfire chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato
Friday chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato
Sunrays chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato
Don’t Worry chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato chiro17, Riinholm & Magnoshi Kato
Feeling Blue Menda, loonight & clava Menda, loonight & clava
Ocean Waves Menda, loonight & clava Menda, loonight & clava
Beach Day Menda, loonight & clava Menda, loonight & clava
Sunset Menda, loonight & clava Menda, loonight & clava
Butterly Menda, loonight & clava Menda, loonight & clava
Dim the Lights Jamania, Menda & Knoodle Jamania, Menda & Knoodle
Break of Dawn Jamania, Menda & Knoodle Jamania, Menda & Knoodle
Sunset Love Jamania, Menda & Knoodle Jamania, Menda & Knoodle
So Good Jamania, Menda & Knoodle Jamania, Menda & Knoodle
Vacation Jamania, Menda & Knoodle Jamania, Menda & Knoodle
Hallucination Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Journey to Jordan Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Mikawa Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Woods of Love Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Sunshine in my heart finton, Chillski & Narvike finton, Chillski & Lars Narvike
Golden Hour finton, Chillski & Narvike finton, Chillski & Lars Narvike
Peanut Butter Jelly finton, Chillski & Narvike finton, Chillski & Lars Narvike
Moonlight finton, Chillski & Narvike finton, Chillski & Lars Narvike
The Journey finton, Chillski & Narvike finton, Chillski & Lars Narvike
Quiet Thoughts clava clava
Anymal clava clava
Head to Head clava clava
Nights in Rome clava clava
Part of This Bristic, snaate & Riinholm Bristic, snaate & Riinholm
Bar Night Bristic, snaate & Riinholm Bristic, snaate & Riinholm
Dinner for Two Bristic, snaate & Riinholm Bristic, snaate & Riinholm
Our History Bristic, snaate & Riinholm Bristic, snaate & Riinholm
Love Story Bristic, snaate & Riinholm Bristic, snaate & Riinholm
Sao Paolo Sunset snaate Snaate
I Miss Home snaate Snaate
Good Reputation snaate Snaate
Passion snaate Snaate
Wonderful Life kazuna Kazuna
Waves kazuna Kazuna
Morning Flow kazuna Kazuna
Spring kazuna Kazuna
Sunday Stroll kazuna Kazuna
Call Me Please Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Got the Feels Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Salir De Marcha Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Un Flechazo Lars Narvike Lars Narvike
Happy Times Jamania Jamania
Paris Jamania Jamania
Dinner for One Jamania Jamania
In the Moment Jamania Jamania
Daydreaming Jamania Jamania
Blossom Chillski Chillski
New York Nights Chillski Chillski
Diverted Chillski Chillski
Dreamy Clouds Chillski Chillski
Happy Day Chilllski Chillski
Blue Sky Jamania Jamania
Friendship Jamania Jamania
Clouds Jamania Jamania
Lucky Day Jamania Jamania
Late Night Drive Jamania Jamania

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E.C. and S.K.G.; methodology, J.E.C., S.K.G., V.K. and A.E.J.; validation, J.E.C. and S.K.G.; formal analysis, J.E.C. and S.K.G.; investigation, J.E.C., V.K., S.K.G., J.K., L.Z., D.S., C.C. and N.K.; resources, J.E.C. and S.K.G.; data curation, J.E.C., V.K., A.E.J. and S.K.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.E.C., S.K.G., V.K. and A.E.J.; writing—review and editing, visualization, J.E.C., S.K.G., V.K., L.Z., D.S., C.C., N.K. and A.E.J.; revision, J.E.C., V.K., S.K.G., J.K., L.Z., D.S., C.C., N.K. and A.E.J.; project administration, J.E.C., S.K.G. and V.K.; funding acquisition, J.E.C. and S.K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (STUDY21110130) and the trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05263635) before any eligible patients were recruited and consented. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study after IRB approval and registration with Clinicaltrials.gov.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05263635).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding agencies played no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

Funded in part by the UPMC Shadyside Foundation and the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Abate S.M., Chekol Y.A., Basu B. Global prevalence and determinants of preoperative anxiety among surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. Open. 2020;25:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2020.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Institute of Medicine. Board on Health Sciences Policy. Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education . Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. National Academy of Sciences; Washington, DC, USA: 2011. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. National Academies Press (US) Copyright © 2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azizoddin D.R., Wilson J.M., Flowers K.M., Beck M., Chai P., Enzinger A.C., Edwards R., Miaskowski C., Tulsky J.A., Schreiber K.L. Daily pain and opioid administration in hospitalized patients with cancer: The importance of psychological factors, recent surgery, and current opioid use. Pain. 2023;164:1820–1827. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ip Hui Y.V., Abrishami A., Peng Philip W.H., Wong J., Chung F. Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:657–677. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gorkem U., Togrul C., Sahiner Y., Yazla E., Gungor T. Preoperative anxiety may increase postcesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:974–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang M.M., Hartley R.L., Leung A.A., Ronksley P.E., Jetté N., Casha S., Riva-Cambrin J. Preoperative predictors of poor acute postoperative pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e025091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Valencia L., Becerra Á., Ojeda N., Domínguez A., Prados M., González-Martín J.M., Rodríguez-Pérez A. Effect of Preoperative Anxiety on Postoperative Pain after Craniotomy. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:556. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tadesse M., Ahmed S., Regassa T., Girma T., Hailu S., Mohammed A., Mohammed S. Effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain on patients undergoing elective surgery: Prospective cohort study. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022;73:103190. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gan T.J. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: Prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J. Pain. Res. 2017;10:2287–2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mariano E.R., Dickerson D.M., Szokol J.W., Harned M., Mueller J.T., Philip B.K., Baratta J.L., Gulur P., Robles J., Schroeder K.M., et al. A multisociety organizational consensus process to define guiding principles for acute perioperative pain management. Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2021;47:118–127. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brummett C.M., Waljee J., Goesling J., Moser S., Lin P., Englesbe M.J. New Persistent Opioid Use after Minor and Major Surgery in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170504. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dimitriou V., Mavridou P., Manataki A., Damigos D. The Use of Aromatherapy for Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Perianesth Nurs. 2017;32:530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chelly J.E., Klatt B., O’Malley M., Groff Y., Kearns J., Khetarpal S., Sadhasivam S. The Role of Inhalation Aromatherapy, Lavender and Peppermint in the Management of Perioperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Pain. Relief. 2023;12((Suppl. 1)):3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan M., Chen Z. A systematic review of non-pharmacological interventions used for pain relief after orthopedic surgical procedures. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020;20:36. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chelly J.E., Klatt B.A., Groff Y., O’Malley M., Lin H.S., Sadhasivam S. Role of the NeuroCuple™ Device for the Postoperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Unilateral Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:7395. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deng C., Xie Y., Liu Y., Li Y., Xiao Y. Aromatherapy Plus Intervention music therap Improve Pain Intensity and Anxiety Scores in Patients with Breast Cancer During Perioperative Periods: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2022;22:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rizzo M.G., Jr., Costello J.P., II, Luxenburg D., Cohen J.L., Alberti N., Kaplan L.D. Augmented Reality for Perioperative Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open. 2023;6:e2329310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tola Y.O., Chow K.M., Liang W. Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A systematic review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2021;30:3369–3384. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Álvarez-García C., Yaban Z. The effects of preoperative guided imagery interventions on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain: A meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2020;38:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.101077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee J.H. The Effects of Music on Pain: A Meta-Analysis. J. Music. Ther. 2016;53:430–477. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thw012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lu G., Jia R., Liang D., Yu J., Wu Z., Chen C. Effects of intervention music therap on anxiety: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res. 2021;304:114137. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bojorquez G.R., Jackson K.E., Andrews A.K. Intervention music therap for Surgical Patients: Approach for Managing Pain and Anxiety. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 2020;43:81–85. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kakar E., Billar R.J., van Rosmalen J., Klimek M., Takkenberg J.J.M., Jeekel J. Music intervention to relieve anxiety and pain in adults undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2021;8:e001474. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bradt J., Dileo C., Myers-Coffman K., Biondo J. Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021;10:Cd006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kühlmann A.Y.R., de Rooij A., Kroese L.F., van Dijk M., Hunink M.G.M., Jeekel J. Meta-analysis evaluating music interventions for anxiety and pain in surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2018;105:773–783. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lin C.L., Hwang S.L., Jiang P., Hsiung N.H. Effect of Intervention music therap on Pain after Orthopedic Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2020;20:422–436. doi: 10.1111/papr.12864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baker M., Albelo F., Zhang T., Schneider M.B., Foster M.J., Aneizi A., Hasan S.A., Gilotra M.N., Henn R.F., 3rd PROMIS Depression and Anxiety in shoulder surgery patients. Bone Jt. J. 2022;104:479–485. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1089.R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sullivan M., Bishop S., Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol. Assess. 1995;7:524–532. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Poulsen M.J., Coto J. Nursing Music Protocol and Postoperative Pain. Pain Manag. Nurs. 2018;19:172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kühlmann A.R., van Rosmalen J., Staals L.M., Keyzer-Dekker C.M., Dogger J., de Leeuw T.G., van der Toorn F., Jeekel J., Wijnen R.M., van Dijk M. Music Interventions in Pediatric Surgery (The Music Under Surgery In Children Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth. Analg. 2020;130:991–1001. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chelly J.E. Paravertebral blocks. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2012;30:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stein M.J., Waltho D., Ramsey T., Wong P., Arnaout A., Zhang J. Paravertebral blocks in immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Breast J. 2019;25:631–637. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu X., Song T., Chen X., Zhang J., Shan C., Chang L., Xu H. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:53. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00967-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kuck K., Naik B.I., Domino K.B., Posner K.L., Saager L., Stuart A.R., Johnson K.B., Alpert S.B., Durieux M.E., Sinha A.K., et al. Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Enhanced Observation Study Investigator Group for the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Enhanced Observation Study Collaborator Group: Prolonged opioid use and pain outcome and associated factors after surgery under general anesthesia: A prospective cohort association multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2023;138:462–476. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mann D.L. Is it Time to Abandon the Use of P-Values in Early Phase Translational Trials: Why (Effect) Size Matters. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2024;9:278–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Friedrich S., Reis S., Meybohm P., Kranke P. Preoperative anxiety. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2022;35:674–678. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Svensson I., Sjöström B., Haljamäe H. Assessment of Pain Experiences after Elective Surgery. J. Pain. Symptom Manag. 2000;20:193–201. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Juhl Lunde S., Vuust P., Garza-Villarreal E.A., Vase L. Music-induced analgesia: How does music relieve pain? Pain. 2019;441:989–993. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thompson K.A., Klein D., Alaia M.J., Strauss E.J., Jazrawi L.M., Campbell K.A. Opioid Use Is Reduced in Patients Treated with NSAIDs after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study. Arthrosc. Sports Med. Rehabil. 2021;3:e15–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Olausson A., Svensson C.J., Andréll P., Jildenstål P., Thörn S.-E., Wolf A. Total opioid-free general anaesthesia can improve postoperative outcomes after surgery, without evidence of adverse effects on patient safety and pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2022;66:170–185. doi: 10.1111/aas.13994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Medina-Garzón M. Effectiveness of a Nursing Intervention to Diminish Preoperative Anxiety in Patients Programmed for Knee Replacement Surgery: Preventive Controlled and Randomized Clinical Trial. Investig. Educ. Enferm. 2019;37:e07. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v37n2e07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oliveira P., Porfírio C., Pires R., Silva R., Carvalho J.C., Costa T., Sequeira C. Psychoeducation Programs to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety in Adults: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;20:327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abadi F., Abadi F., Fereidouni Z., Amirkhani M., Karimi S., Najafi Kalyani M. Effect of Acupressure on Preoperative Cesarean Section Anxiety. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2018;11:361–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chelly J.E., Orebaugh S.L., Rodosky M.W., Groff Y.J., Norton B.E., Monroe A.L., Alimi D., Sadhasivam S.K., Vogt K.M. The Effect of Cryo-auriculotherapy on Post-Operative Pain Management following Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. MedRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.02.05.22270330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tong Q.Y., Liu R., Gao Y., Zhang K., Ma W., Shen W.D. Effect of Electroacupuncture Based on ERAS for Preoperative Anxiety in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2022;22:724–736. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Saadat H., Drummond-Lewis J., Maranets I., Kaplan D., Saadat A., Wang S.-M., Kain Z.N. Hypnosis reduces preoperative anxiety in adult patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1394–1396. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000204355.36015.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rousseaux F., Dardenne N., Massion P.B., Ledoux D., Bicego A., Donneau A.F., Faymonville M.E., Nyssen A.S., Vanhaudenhuyse A. Virtual reality and hypnosis for anxiety and pain management in intensive care units: A prospective randomised trial among cardiac surgery patients. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2022;39:58–66. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lai C.H., Chandak S., Karlapudi P., Tokis J. Sex-related differences in PROMs prior to the outcome: Comparison of preoperative PROMIS physical function scores in female vs. male patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int. 2023;7:2473–2475. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05263635).


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES