Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Oct 25;14:25271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77059-5

Preliminary study of molecular identification of Mycobacterium bovis from cow’s milk in Lorestan (Iran)

Amin Zahrakar 1, Ehsan Rashidian 1,, Amin Jaydari 1, Heidar Rahimi 2,
PMCID: PMC11512005  PMID: 39455815

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is one of the most important common infectious diseases between humans and livestock. Cow’s milk can be investigated as one of the transmission reservoirs of the disease. Our study was conducted to investigate the presence of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) DNA in cow’s milk from different regions of Lorestan province using Touch-down PCR (TD-PCR) method. So, 100 milk samples from industrial and traditional cattle farms were collected and evaluated according to the animal breed, the average age of the animal and the region where the animal was kept. Seven (26.9%) out of the 26 cow’s milk samples contaminated with Mycobacterium spp., were diagnosed as M. bovis positive. The cattle with an average age of more than 5 years were most infected with Mycobacterium. Also, the crossbred cattle with an average age of 3 to 5 years, which were kept and raised in tropical areas, showed the highest rate of M. bovis infection. Based on our knowledge, this is the first study regarding the presence of Mycobacterium in cow’s milk in Iran.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-77059-5.

Keywords: Milk, Cow, Mycobacterium bovis, Touch-down PCR, Iran

Subject terms: Infectious-disease diagnostics, Tuberculosis

Introduction

Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) as the main causative agent of bovine tuberculosis, has the most host diversity among the members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex1. It is estimated that more than 50 million cattle in the world are infected with this bacterium2. Before the general use of pasteurization, 20 to 40% of human cases of tuberculosis were attributed to M. bovis. Currently, the infection rate in the world is estimated to be around 1.4%. Although, this amount has been reported higher in different regions of the world such as Mexico, Africa, Brazil and Palestine3,4. In Turkey, Iran’s western neighbor, about 4.3% of human tuberculosis cases have been determined to be caused by M. bovis5. In Iran, bovine tuberculosis was isolated for the first time in 1931 by the French veterinarian Carpantier from the carcasses of native cows in Tehran slaughterhouse6,7. Later similar reports were recorded by Iranian veterinarians in 1945 and 1946 and after that from other regions of the country8. Despite the implementation of the test and slaughter program, currently less than 8% of the country’s cattle herd (the total cattle population of the country is estimated to be less than eight millions) are covered by this program. Besides, this program is mostly focused on controlling the disease in purebred and crossbred cows9. The presence of tuberculosis-infected cow carcasses in the annual reports of most slaughterhouses in Iran shows that the disease has become endemic in Iran and it does not seem possible to eradicate this disease in the country in a short time.

With more than 500 active industrial cattle farms and about 25,300 purebred cows in industrial and semi-industrial cattle farms, Lorestan province ranks sixth in the country’s livestock population. In this province, the tuberculosis disease control program by performing the tuberculin test has been implemented for the past few decades. Dairy products in Lorestan province have a higher per capita consumption than other parts of Iran. Meanwhile, one of the popular dairy products used in this region is cheese obtained from the processing of raw cow’s milk, which can be the cause of common diseases, such as tuberculosis, between humans and animals. It should be noted that the prevalence of human tuberculosis in this province has been estimated about 10 cases per 100,000 persons. Currently, there are no comprehensive studies that indicate the incidence of bovine tuberculosis or even human tuberculosis caused by M. bovis in this province. Tuberculosis caused by M. bovis is considered as one of the most important diseases occurring in the cattle population, and after being transferred to humans, it causes major risks in public health. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the proportion and extent of cow’s milk contamination with M. bovis in different regions of Lorestan province by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Materials and methods

Study design and research area

The present study investigated the presence of M. bovis in cow’s milk obtained from industrial and traditional cattle farms in different regions of Lorestan province in 2020. Lorestan province, with an approximate area of ​​28,175 square kilometers, is located in the southwestern region of Iran between 46 degrees 50 min to 50 degrees 1 min east longitude and 32 degrees 40 min to 34 degrees 23 min north latitude from the Greenwich meridian. Due to the lack of previous studies regarding the amount of bovine tuberculosis in cow milk in Iran, the present study was conducted as a preliminary study in Lorestan province in order to provide the basis for more extensive research. Some of the reasons for choosing Lorestan province for this research are as follows: the presence of a favorable population of cows with a daily production of about 620 tons of milk, high-quality agricultural lands and various climates, including cold to temperate (Delfan, Selsele, Azna, Aliguderz and Borujerd) and tropical regions (Khorramabad, Dorud, Poldokhtar and Kohdasht) with a temperature difference of about 8 to 12 degrees Celsius (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of Iran showing the geographic location of the study areas mentioned in article.

Milk samples

One hundred samples of raw milk were randomly collected from industrial and traditional cattle farms in Lorestan province from January to March 2020. After disinfecting each Cartier with 70% alcohol and discarding the first few cc, 50 ml of milk was collected from each cow, and then the age range and breed of the animal were recorded. Finally, the samples were transferred to the laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Lorestan University on ice. It is evident that the study is preliminary, and the sampling method and the sample size were chosen for convenience.

DNA extraction

After vortexing each milk sample, 10 ml of that sample was transferred to a 10 ml plastic conical tube sterile (Falcon) and centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the superficial fat layer was removed with a sterile swab and the supernatant was discarded. Finally, 200 µl of the sediment were transferred to a new micro tube and DNA extraction was performed using the Korean Gene All kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA was measured using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (USA). The extracted DNA was stored at -20 °C until molecular work.

DNA amplification and detection of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products

Using TD-PCR method, the specific 16 S rRNA gene of the Mycobacterium spp. with a size of 543 bp10 and the specific nucleotide sequence of the M. bovis species with a size of 500 bp were identified11. Forward (5’-ACG GTG GGT ACT AGG TGT GGG TTT C -3’) and reverse (5’-TCT GCG ATT ACT AGC GAC TCC GAC TTC A − 3’) primers were used for amplification of the 16 S rRNA gene, and also JB21 forward (5’- TCGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC − 3’) and JB22 reverse (5’- CGTCCGCTGACCTCAAGAAG − 3’) primers for amplification of the fragment sequenced of M. bovis species.

Touch-down (TD) PCR amplification was performed by using PCR master kit (Ampliqon Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix RED 1.25 mL, Ampliqon Denmark) with 25 µL mixtures containing 12.5 µL of 2X master mix, 0.5 µL of each primer, and 4 µL of the extracted DNA. The BCG vaccine (supplied by the Iranian Pasteur Institute) were used as the positive control. For the negative control, sterile water was added instead of nucleic acids. Further, the amplification was conducted by Bio-Rad thermo cycler (Model T- 100, USA) under the following conditions: A for Mycobacterium spp. and B for M. bovis species.

  • A.

    The initial step of 94°C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, annealing temperatures starting at 64°C for 45 s (decreasing 1°C/cycle), and finally, at 72°C for 45 s for the extension. This step was followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, and finally, 72°C for 10 min.

  • B.

    The initial step of 95°C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, annealing temperatures starting at 72°C for 30 s (decreasing 1°C/cycle), and finally, at 72°C for 1 min for the extension. This step was followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 68°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min, and finally, 72°C for 10 min.

The TD-PCR products were separated in a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel (Merck, Germany) containing 2.5 µg/mL gel stain (Smobio, Taiwan). Electrophoresis was performed in 0.5x Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer for one hour at 100 V. The resulting PCR products were visualized under a UV translluminator (E-Box, Iran) and the 100 bp DNA ladder (Smobio, Taiwan) plus was used as the molecular size marker.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were analyzed by Chi-square test using IBM SPSS 20 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Based on the results of the present study, out of 100 cow’s milk samples taken from 8 cities of Lorestan province, 26 samples showed the presence of Mycobacterium species DNA, (Fig. 2) of which 7 were confirmed as M. bovis (Fig. 3). The highest presence of Mycobacterium spp. was seen in cows with an average age of more than 5 years at the rate of 32.6%, and in cows with an average age of 1–3 years and 3–5 years, this rate was 11.1% and 23.3%, respectively. This is while the proportion of M. bovis infection in cows with an average age of 3 to 5 years was higher than other cows (Table 1). The proportion of Mycobacterium species in the samples taken from tropical and cold to temperate regions was 25.4 and 26.6%, respectively. Examination of 13 native breed cows (Zebu) indicated that none of them had M. bovis contamination and only one cow’s milk showed Mycobacterium contamination. In the study of 87 crossbred cows, it was found that 28.7% (25 cows) had milk contaminated with Mycobacterium, and M. bovis was detected in 7 of these cows (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Touch-down PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium spp. Lane M: Standard DNA marker; Lane 1: Positive control (543 bp); Lane 2: Negative control; Lanes: 3–8 Positive samples with Mycobacterium spp. DNA.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Touch-down PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis. Lane M: Standard DNA marker; Lane 1: Positive control (500 bp); Lane 2: Negative control; Lanes: 3–8 Positive samples with Mycobacterium bovis DNA.

Table 1.

Mycobacterium positive cases according to genus/species, sampling location, age and breed of cattle.

Row Sample code Mycobacterium spp. positive Mycobacterium bovis Regions Climate conditions of the region Age Breed type
1 3.1.1 Delfan Cold to temperate 3 Crossbreed Cattle
2 3.1.18 + Delfan Cold to temperate 5 Crossbreed Cattle
3 3.1.3 Delfan Cold to temperate 6 Zebu local breeds
4 3.2.14 Selsele Cold to temperate 5 Crossbreed Cattle
5 5.1.1 Azna Cold to temperate 7 Crossbreed Cattle
6 5.1.17 Aligodarz Cold to temperate 4 Crossbreed Cattle
7 5.1.13 Aligodarz Cold to temperate 6 Crossbreed Cattle
8 5.1.5 Aligodarz Cold to temperate 7 Crossbreed Cattle
9 4.2.16 Brojerd Cold to temperate 4 Crossbreed Cattle
10 4.1.18 Brojerd Cold to temperate 2 Crossbreed Cattle
11 4.1.1 + Brojerd Cold to temperate 6 Crossbreed Cattle
12 4.1.11 Brojerd Cold to temperate 6 Crossbreed Cattle
13 2.1.19 + Kohdasht Tropical 7 Crossbreed Cattle
14 2.2.5 Kohdasht Tropical 4 Crossbreed Cattle
15 2.2.1 Kohdasht Tropical 7 Crossbreed Cattle
16 2.1.6 + Kohdasht Tropical 5 Crossbreed Cattle
17 1.1.16 Khorramabad Tropical 6 Crossbreed Cattle
18 1.1.18 Khorramabad Tropical 7 Crossbreed Cattle
19 1.1.10 Khorramabad Tropical 6 Crossbreed Cattle
20 1.2.15 Khorramabad Tropical 5 Crossbreed Cattle
21 1.1.14 Khorramabad Tropical 7 Crossbreed Cattle
22 1.2.1 + Khorramabad Tropical 6 Crossbreed Cattle
23 1.2.10 Khorramabad Tropical 9 Crossbreed Cattle
24 4.2.18 + Dorod Tropical 7 Crossbreed Cattle
25 4.2.10 + Dorod Tropical 5 Crossbreed Cattle
26 4.2.19 Dorod Tropical 8 Crossbreed Cattle

Table 2.

The number of milk samples collected and number of positive cases for Mycobacterium spp. and Mycobacterium bovis.

Parameters 1 to 3 years old 3 to 5 years old 5 years up Tropical region cold to temperate region Crossbreed Cattle Zebu local breeds
Number of samples 18 30 52 55 45 87 13
Mycobacterium SPP. infection 2 7 17 14 12 25 1
Mycobacterium bovis infection 0 3 4 5 2 7 0

Discussion

Bovine tuberculosis is a zoonotic disease of public health importance that affects livestock and humans worldwide. The most common cause of this disease is M. bovis, whose main host is cattle. The infected cattle play an important role in the transmission of the disease. In the present study, because of the limitations of the bacterial culture conditions and limited laboratory equipment, the presence of M. bovis DNA was investigated by tracing and identifying the specific gene of the species in cow’s milk samples taken from different regions of Lorestan province. Considering the presence of impurities in milk, in the studies of Zumárraga and col12,13 to prove the presence of Mycobacterium and also in some similar studies1419. To identify the DNA of the target bacteria in milk, the TD-PCR method has been used successfully. Therefore, in the present study, this method was used to detection of cow’s milk with M. bovis. Very limited studies have been done to identify cattle with tuberculosis in Iran. In 1959, using the intradermal comparative tuberculin test, the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in Iran was estimated at 28%. This was while in 1984 this amount was estimated at about 3%6. In the study of Tadayon et al.20, out of 470 samples obtained from the lymph nodes and lungs of cattle suspected of having tuberculosis (cattle with positive intradermal comparative tuberculin test (PICTT), 216 samples of M. bovis were isolated by culture method. Finally, 132 samples of these cases were investigated by genotyping methods and all of the strains were confirmed as M. bovis. In the study by Mosavari et al. in 201121, from the examination of slaughterhouse samples obtained from 213 PICTT cows from different regions of Iran using culture methods, acid fast staining, as well as PCR method with IS 6110 and also RFLP detection, a number of 67 heads (31.4%) showed infection with mycobacterium, and all isolates were M. bovis. In the study of Ghaderi et al. in 202022, from the examination of 50 pathological samples obtained from PICTT cows in the city of Shiraz (Iran) using culture and PCR method with 16 S rRNA gene detection, it was found that 13 heads (26%) were infected with mycobacterium species. In the examination of the positive mycobacterium samples by RD Typing method, it was found that all species were M. bovis. In the study of Qazvini et al. in 202323, from the examination of 123 slaughterhouse samples obtained from PICTT cows in northeastern Iran, 21 samples (17%) showed mycobacterium contamination, and in the genotyping study, all isolates were diagnosed as M. bovis.

In the study of Ashouri and Noorani in 202024, from the examination of 108 slaughterhouse samples in PICTT cows using histopathology and Real-Time PCR methods, they showed that the level of infection with Mycobacterium were as follow: 58(54.00%) cows were M. bovis positive, 46 (43.00%) were Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis positive, and 11(10.00%) were Mycobacterium tuberculosis positive. Although other studies conducted in Iran2023 have detected only M. bovis in cattle samples, but in the Ashouri and Noorani study24, they confirmed infection with other Mycobacterium species, which may be due to the difference in sampling areas and diagnostic methods. It has been confirmed that most strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis do not have the ability to grow in culture media, and a large number of its strains take a long time (16–25 weeks) to show detectable growth in culture media2528. On the other hand, Mycobacterium tuberculosis needs at least 3 weeks to grow, while some strains of M. bovis are able to grow within 5–6 days to show recognizable growth in the culture medium29. Since in the present study the rate of infection with Mycobacterium spp. and M. bovis species was determined to be 26% and 7%, respectively, our study shows that more than half of the target cows may be infected with other Mycobacterium species, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Therefore, considering the limitations of culture, using PCR method to detect the source of infection with direct detection of DNA of mycobacteria, especially in sources such as milk, can be very useful for detecting infected farms. However, in terms of the importance of tuberculosis disease to public health, it is better to study more detailed plans regarding the identification, control and eradication of the disease in more comprehensive studies. In the studies conducted to identify M. bovis in cow’s milk in some countries, the rates were determined to be as follows: 13.1% in India30, 10.2% and 12.1% in Iraq31,32, 4.9% in Tunisia33, 2% in Brazil34 and 2% in Egypt35. Compared to the studies conducted in some other countries3035, the current research indicates a high prevalence of M. bovis in Iran and some other developing countries, and this issue is not only important in the economy of animal husbandry, but also a threat to the health of the people in the society. It should be mentioned that some studies3638 have shown the contamination of people with tuberculosis in Iran by M. bovis species. In Yaghoubi et al. study, on 27 positive Mmycobacterium culture samples received from the Center for Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis in Zanjan Province (Iran), 25 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 2 isolates (7.4%) of M. bovis were detected36. In the study conducted by Soleimanpour et al. in Iran, based on the examination of 42 samples obtained from people with tuberculosis, one case (2.3%) of M. bovis was diagnosed37. In the study of Mozafari et al., 6 samples (0.48%) of M. bovis were identified from the examination of 1242 samples taken from people with tuberculosis infection in different provinces of Iran38.

In the present study, the highest rate of Mycobacterium contamination is seen in the cows with an average age of more than 5 years (32.6%). This association could be due to the older age and the greater exposure to the bacteria. Therefore, it can be concluded that in conducting tests related to bovine tuberculosis, older cows are more likely to be carriers and can be considered as risk factors in the herd, so they should be considered more and the number of annual tests should be increased. Also, in the present study, the highest rate of contamination (10%) was observed in cows with an average age of 3 to 5 years and it was caused by M. bovis species. M. bovis infection rate was found to be 0.0% in cows with an average age of 1 to 3 years and 7.6% in cows over 5 years old. The recent finding indicates the higher pathogenic power of M. bovis for cattle compared to other Mycobacterium species. Thus, it can be assumed that cows with bovine tuberculosis (caused by M. bovis) usually show symptoms of the disease such as cachexia earlier in the first months or years of infection, and the probability of removing them from the herd is higher. As mentioned earlier, cases of infection caused by M. bovis in cattle with an average age of 1 to 3 years were detected at 0.0%. This may be due to the less exposure of younger cows to this bacterium or the lack of milk production in some cows belonging to this age group and subsequently the lack of sampling from them in the present study. In evaluating the effect of regional weather conditions, the rate of infection with M. bovis species was higher in tropical regions (9%) than in cold regions (4.4%). Also, the results of the present study showed that the level of contamination of cow’s milk with bovis species is higher in cows with an average age of 3 to 5 years that have been raised in tropical regions. Since in the present study, none of the native breed cows showed M. bovis infection, the present study in consistency with similar studies6,7,39,40 indicates that crossbred cattle compare to native ones (Zebu breed) are more likely to be infected with bovine tuberculosis. Local breeds of cattle seem to show physiologically higher resistance than crossbred breeds to infection with M. bovis, this could be due to the fact that local breeds of cattle have a higher level of immunity due to long-term exposure to the pathogen. On the other hand, crossbred cows have a lower level of immunity due to a little or no previous exposure to the pathogen8,9. The detection of M. bovis in 7% of the milk samples in this study indicates that the testing and slaughtering programs of TB-affected cows were not very successful, which may be due to the following factors:

  • Inability to definitively diagnose infected cows with tuberculin test: Not all cattle infected with bovine tuberculosis can be detected by the tuberculin test, so some of them may be remain as carriers for a long time, spreading the disease in the herd or even in the region, So that in the study of Zumárraga and col12 in Argentina, the survey results of 177 milk samples taken from the tank (Bulk Tank Milk Samples) in herds with an official TB-free certificate showed that 38% of the samples have contamination with M. bovis. On the other hand, the tuberculin test is not performed in all cows in Iran and only about 10% of the total cow population of Iran is covered by regular tuberculin testing6. In addition, this program is mostly focused on disease control in purebred and crossbred cattle.

  • Ignoring reservoirs of the disease that are not investigated and controlled: in Iran, there are still no complete studies of the level of contamination of sheep and goats with M. bovis. While in studies conducted in Ethiopia 5.29% of small ruminants41, in Palestine 2.7% of goat milk samples42, in Nigeria (tissue samples of lung and liver in goat) 4.47%43, showed contamination with M. bovis. In 2016, for the first time, M. bovis was isolated from a case of a dead European fallow deer (Dama dama dama) in Howeizeh Zoo (Khuzestan - Iran)44. Also, in another research and after isolating acid fast bacteria from house mice with a biological colony in a cattle farm in Isfahan city (Iran), it was determined in a molecular investigation that one of these mice was infected with M bovis9. In the study by Akhtar et al.45 in Pakistan, after laboratory examination of the carcasses of a number of animals that had been died in the zoo, it was found that 3.7% and 1.1% of the carcasses were contaminated with M. bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, respectively. These studies show that one of the important reasons that prevent the eradication of bovine tuberculosis is the role of vector animals in the spread of this disease, perhaps because in Lorestan province and most parts of Iran, sheep and goats are kept next to cows. Therefore, this case should be investigated and the necessary plans should be made regarding the identification of carrier animals.

  • Another influential factor in the permanence of bovine tuberculosis in Iran is the insufficient support of the government to the rancher in order to kill positive reactor cattle and pay compensation. This causes other ranchers to refrain from conducting tests for their herds. It can also be mentioned that there are no sufficient reference veterinary laboratories in the diagnosis of infected animals69,20,21.

The present study is in sync with some similar studies (including:9,24,41,42) and indicates that unpasteurized milk consumed by humans can be an important source of infection with Mycobacterium species, especially M. bovis. Because in Lorestan province and even many other regions of Iran, people tend to prepare and consume dairy products, especially cheese, in a traditional way, and considering that traditional cheese is made from raw milk, and unfortunately, the consumers do not have the necessary health conditions. Like cheese made from raw milk, they do not keep it in salt water for two months, so raw milk is considered as a risk factor in the transmission of bovine tuberculosis to humans. In Lorestan province and even many other regions of Iran, people tend to prepare and consume dairy products, especially cheese, in a traditional way. It should be mentioned that in the traditional method, cheese is prepared from raw milk. Unfortunately, most of the consumers do not follow the recommended health measures, such as keeping cheese processed from raw milk in salt water for at least two months. It is obvious that the consumption of raw milk and unsanitary products, including the mentioned traditional cheeses, will be risk factors for the transmission of bovine tuberculosis to humans.

Conclusions

It should be noted that the prevalence of human tuberculosis caused by M. bovis in Lorestan province and other regions of Iran is unknown, and only the prevalence of M. tuberculosis in humans has been investigated. It should be noted that Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been isolated from the milk of ruminants30,42 and this indicates that the consumption of milk and other unsanitary dairy products by humans may be effective in contracting tuberculosis caused by M. tuberculosis species. Considering the point that not all positive samples of bovine tuberculosis can be identified by the tuberculin intradermal test, and regarding the fact that it is not possible to perform molecular methods for all cows in the same herd due to the high cost of implementation, it is suggested in the initial investigation, a general sample of the milk of each cattle farm (milk tank specific to the same cattle farm) should be examined with the TD-PCR method, and if the result is positive, the whole herd should be tested and evaluated individually. Also, due to the transmission of tuberculosis from milk to humans and its health importance, it is suggested to investigate the presence of tuberculosis in the milk of sheep and goats and even other possible carriers such as dogs and cats, as well as the rate of people suffering from tuberculosis caused by M. bovis.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (208.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Rahimi Tahmasebi and Mr. Ali Karimpoor for their aid in sample collection.

Abbreviations

M. bovis

Mycobacterium bovis

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

TD-PCR

Touch-down PCR

PICTT

Positive intradermal comparative tuberculin test

TBE

Tris/Borate/EDTA

Author contributions

.A.Z., and H.R: Methodology, Formal analysis. E.R., and H.R: Project administration, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. A.J: Conceptualization.

Funding

This study was supported by Lorestan University (Iran).

Data availability

All obtained data from this study was included in this manuscript and are available on request from the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Ehsan Rashidian, Email: rashidian.e@lu.ac.ir.

Heidar Rahimi, Email: Heidar.rahimi@semnan.ac.ir.

References

  • 1.Schiller, I. et al. Bovine tuberculosis: a review of current and emerging diagnostic techniques in View of their relevance for Disease Control and Eradication. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 57, 205–220. 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01148.x (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Steele, J. H. Regional and country status reports. In: Thoen CO. Mycobacterium bovis infection in animals and humans. Can. Vet. J. 49, 688 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ereqat, S. et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis in the West Bank, Palestinian Authority: molecular diagnostic approach. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 16 360-7 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Müller, B. et al. African 1, an epidemiologically important Clonal Complex of Mycobacterium bovis Dominant in Mali, Nigeria, Cameroon, and Chad. J. Bacteriol. 191, 1951–1960. 10.1128/jb.01590-08 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bayraktar, B. et al. Species distribution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Clinical isolates from 2007 to 2010 in Turkey: a prospective study. J. C Microbiol. 49, 3837–3841. 10.1128/jcm.01172-11 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khavari Khorasani, I. Research in Bovine Tuberculosis in Iran, First edvol. 1 (Iranian Veterinary Organisation, Tehran, 1999).
  • 7.Mohammadi, M. Bovine tuberculosis in Iran, first ed., 1. Iran. Veterinary Organisation Tehran (1984).
  • 8.Tadayon, K., Mosavari, N. & Feizabadi, M. M. An epidemiological perspective on bovine tuberculosis spotlighting facts and dilemmas in Iran, a historically zebu-dominant farming country. I J. Microbiol. 5, 1–13 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tadayon, K. et al. A review of the contemporary knowledge of bovine tuberculosis and government policy in Iran. Vet. Microbiol. 151, 192–199. 10.1016/J.VETMIC.2011.02.044 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huard, R. C., Oliveira Lazzarini, L. C., Butler, W. R., van Soolingen, D. & Ho, J. L. PCR-Based Method to differentiate the subspecies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex on the basis of genomic deletions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 1637–1650. 10.1128/jcm.41.4.1637-1650.2003 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodriguez, J. G., Mejia, G. A., Del Portillo, P., Patarroyo, M. E. & Murillo, L. A. Species-specific identification of Mycobacterium bovis by PCR. Microbiol. 141, 2131–2138. 10.1099/13500872-141-9-2131 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zumárraga, M. J. et al. Use of touch-down polymerase chain reaction to enhance the sensitivity of Mycobacterium bovis detection. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 17, 232–238. 10.1177/104063870501700303 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zumárraga, M. J. et al. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis–infected dairy herds using PCR in Bulk Tank milk samples. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 9, 132–137. 10.1089/fpd.2011.0963 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hecker, K. H. & Roux, K. H. High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and stepdown PCR. Biotechniques. 20, 478–485. 10.2144/19962003478 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsen, H. H. et al. Development and evaluation of a quantitative, Touch-Down, Real-Time PCR assay for diagnosing pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 490–494. 10.1128/JCM.40.2.490-494.2002 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Psifidi, A., Dovas, C. I. & Banos, G. A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples. Mol. Cell. Probes. 24, 93–98. 10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Usman, T., Yu, Y., Liu, C., Fan, Z. & Wang, Y. Comparison of methods for high quantity and quality genomic DNA extraction from raw cow milk. Genet. Mol. Res. 13, 3319–3328. 10.4238/2014.April.29.10 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rahimi, H., Tukmechi, A. & Rashidian, E. Use of touch-down polymerase chain reaction to enhance the sensitivity of Brucella melitensis detection in raw milk. Animl Biotechnol. 33, 104–109. 10.1080/10495398.2020.1777149 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rostami, S., Rashidian, E., Jaydari, A. & Rahimi, H. Investigation of the proportion of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis in Sheep and Goat milk. Vet. Med. Inter. 10.1155/2023/6751152 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Tadayon, K., Mosavari, N., Sadeghi, F. & Forbes, K. J. Mycobacterium bovis infection in Holstein Friesian cattle. Iran. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 1919–1921. 10.3201/eid1412.070727 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mosavari, N. et al. Molecular genotyping and epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis strains obtained from cattle in Iran. Vete Microbiol. 151, 148–152. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.038 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghaderi, H. et al. Isolation, Molecular Identification and genomic pattern of Mycobacterium Bovis isolates collected from tuberculin-positive cattle in infected farms of Shiraz. Iran. J. Q. Uni Med. Sci. 23, 526–239. 10.32598/JQUMS.23.6.5 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghazvini, K. et al. Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolated from humans and animals in northeastern Iran. Sci. Rep. 13, 6746. 10.1038/s41598-023-33740-9 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ashouri, M. & Nourani, H. Performance of immunohistochemistry versus real-time PCR method for detecting mycobacterial infections of cattle screened by comparative tuberculin test. Artic. Vet. Res. Forum. 13, 223–231. 10.30466/vrf.2020.122038.2871 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hannah Dane, L. D., Stewart, Irene, R. & Grant Culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: challenges, limitations and future prospects. J. Appl. Microbiol., 134, Issue 1, January 2023, lxac017. 10.1093/jambio/lxac017 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Cernicchiaro, N. et al. Influence of type of culture medium on characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subtypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 145–149. 10.1128/JCM.01769-07 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dundee, L. et al. Comparative evaluation of four decontamination protocols for the isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from milk. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 173–177. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00979.x (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stevenson, K. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenesis: a review. Vet. Res. 46, 64. 10.1186/s13567-015-0203-2 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Susan, T., Howard, Thomas, F. & Byrd The rapidly growing mycobacteria: saprophytes and parasites, Microbes and Infection, Volume 2, Issue 15,2000, Pages 1845–1853, ISSN 1286–4579. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01338-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Mishra, A. et al. Direct detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in bovine samples by a Novel Nested PCR assay: correlation with conventional techniques. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 5670–5678. 10.1128/jcm.43.11.5670-5678.2005 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Saqur, I. M., Al-Thwani, A. N. & Al-Attar, I. M. Detection of Mycobacteria spp. in cows milk using conventional methods and PCR. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 23, 259–262 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Senthil, N. R., Ranjani, M. R. & Vasumathi, K. Comparative diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis by polymerase chain reaction and ZielNeilson staining technique using milk and nasal washing. J. Res. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2, 1–3 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kahla, B. I. Isolation and molecular characterisation of Mycobacterium bovis from raw milk in Tunisia. Afr. Health Sci. 11, S2–S5 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Figueiredo, E. E. et al. Molecular techniques for identification of species of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: the use of multiplex PCR and an adapted HPLC method for identification of Mycobacterium bovis and diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. In: Cardona PJ, editor. Understanding tuberculosis: global experiences and innovative approaches to the diagnosis. Rijeka: InTech. pp. 411 – 32. (2012).
  • 35.Nasr, S. E., Saad, N. M., Nasr, E. A., Wahba, N. M. & Elsherif, W. M. Detection of bovine tuberculosis in milk and serum of tuberculin reactors dairy farm animals in Assiut City, Egypt. Basic. Res. J. Anim. Sci. 1, 1–6 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yaghoubi, S. et al. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from patients in Markazi Province. Iran. South. Med. J. 17, 602–611 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Soleimanpour, S. et al. Zoonotic tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis, central province, Iran. J. Lung Pulm Res. 2, 54–57 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mozafari, M. et al. Molecular diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains indifferent provinces of Iran. Iran. J. Microbiol. 5, 366–373 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Diguimbaye-Djaibé, C. et al. Mycobacterium bovis Isolates from Tuberculous Lesions in Chadian Zebu Carcasses. Emerg Infect Dis. (2006). www.cdc.gov/eid [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Johnson, L. et al. Low-dose Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle results in pathology indistinguishable from that of high-dose infection. Tubercul. 87, 71–76. 10.1016/J.TUBE.2006.04.002 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ashenafi, D., Mamo, G., Ameni, G. & Simenew, K. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of causative agents of bovine tuberculosis in ruminants. J. Bacteriol. Parasit. 4(1), 1000161. 10.4172/2155-9597.1000161 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ereqat, S. et al. First-time detection of Mycobacterium bovis in livestock tissues and milk in the West Bank, Palestinian territories. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7(9), e2417. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002417 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fischer, R. J., Johnson, T. L., Raffel, S. J. & Schwan, T. G. Identical strains of Borrelia hermsii in mammal and bird. Emerg Infect Dis. 15, 2064–2066. (2009). 10.3201/eid1512.090792 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Mombeni, E. G. et al. Case Report First Report of Mycobacterium bovis isolation from a European fallow deer (Dama Dama Dama) in Iran. Iran. J. Public. Health. 45, 814–816 (2016). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Akhtar, K. et al. Molecular identification and infection pathology of Mycobacterium spp. in captive wild animals in Pakistan. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 17, 1107–1113. 10.3855/jidc.17287 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (208.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All obtained data from this study was included in this manuscript and are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES