Skip to main content
Viruses logoLink to Viruses
. 2024 Oct 9;16(10):1582. doi: 10.3390/v16101582

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Seroprevalence in Gabon: Findings from a Nationwide Household Serosurvey in a Sub-Saharan Africa Country

Samira Zoa-Assoumou 1,2,*,, Paulin Essone-Ndong 3,4,, Rafiou Adamou 3,, Sandrine Lydie Oyegue-Liabagui 5,6,, Amandine Mveang Nzoghe 7, Bayodé Roméo Adegbite 3, Armel Mintsa Ndong 4, Herve Mboyis-Kandem 1, Marien Juliet Verraldy Magossou Mbadinga 7, Angelique Ndjoyi-Mbiguino 1, Armel Brice Amalet Akagha 8, Krystina Mengue Me Ngou-Milama 8, Magaran Monzon Bagayoko 8, Inoua Aboubacar 8, Jean-Bernard Lekana-Douki 5,9, Joel Fleury Djoba Siawaya 7,, Ayola Akim Adegnika 3,10,11,, Edgard-Brice Ngoungou 12,*,; COVID-19 Gabonese Group§
Editors: Fabrício S Campos, Luciana Barros de Arruda, Maite FS Vaslin
PMCID: PMC11512409  PMID: 39459916

Abstract

Seroconversion surveys of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies provide accurate estimates of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections. This nationwide population-based cross-sectional serosurvey aimed to evaluate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among residents in Gabon and compare the estimated cumulative number of COVID-19 cases with the officially registered number of laboratory-confirmed cases up to December 2021. Households in each province were randomly selected. Twenty-eight localities, including sixteen urban and twelve rural, were randomly selected for the study. Whole blood samples were collected in dry tubes from all study participants nationwide within 15 days. Serum samples were used to measure SARS-CoV-2-specific ELISA titers. Overall, data from 1672 households were analyzed. Out of the 3659 participants, 3175 were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, resulting in a crude seroprevalence of 86.77%. Stratification of study participants by age group showed the highest seroprevalences in the 20–29 and 40–49 age groups with 91.78% (95% CI: 89.5–93.6) and 91.42% (95% CI: 88.7–93.5), respectively. Nyanga province had the lowest prevalence (72.8%), and Estuaire and Ogooué-Lolo provinces had the highest prevalence (90 and 92%). Our results suggest a high transmission rate in the Gabonese population 21 months after the first SARS-CoV-2 case in the country. This high seroprevalence estimate could indicate that the population may not have adequately implemented or appropriately adhered to the applied infection control measures.

Keywords: population-based survey, antibody, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, seroprevalence, Gabon

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread and caused high morbidity and mortality worldwide since it was first reported in Wuhan in the Chinese province of Hubei in late 2019 [1,2]. In Central Africa, Gabon was the third most affected country by COVID-19 behind Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo, with 48,980 cases and 306 deaths of critically ill patients since the first confirmed case of COVID-19 on 12 March 2020 (https://africacdc.org/COVID-19/, accessed on 12 December 2023).

The response strategy against COVID-19 in Gabon was based on tests performed on travelers, suspected cases, and direct contacts of people who tested positive in the country and the implementation of prevention and control measures [3].

In this country of 2.1 million inhabitants, a network of 15 RT-PCR laboratories located across the country with 60 sampling sites performed between 2000 and 5000 tests per day.

Moreover, in a previous cross-sectional study conducted in Libreville, Gabon, the mortality rate associated with COVID-19 infection from March to June 2020 was shown to be low, and patients who died of COVID-19 infection were found to be younger on average than reported elsewhere [4].

Between 12 March 2020 and 20 November 2021, the country tested 266,271 people and recorded a total of 9069 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive cases (3.4% infection rate), 8938 patients who were cured (98.5% cured rate), 65 active cases, and 58 deaths (0.6% case fatality rate) (Country report).

Although massive screening campaigns were occasionally organized in the country, the actual infection rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, remains unclear since asymptomatic individuals may represent the hidden face of the iceberg and, therefore, a major source of viral spread. Case reporting is influenced by strategies implemented for case finding, testing, and contact tracing and may underestimate the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

As recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), measuring the extent of seropositivity could estimate the proportion of individuals positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the population. It could further indicate the rate of disease transmission over time [5]. Moreover, as the extent of infection is heavily related to social interactions, population density and the assessment of the proportion of potentially protected individuals in the population help the authorities to plan public health interventions. Population-based seroepidemiological studies help measure the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the effect of ongoing public health responses on controlling the pandemic [5]. Due to the increased number of hospital cases and patients, restrictions on mass gatherings were initiated in April 2020. These restrictions were accompanied by a vaccination campaign as a measure to control the pandemic. Indeed, Gabon began its vaccination campaign on 23 March 2021, and it is based on the Sinopharm vaccine. As of 18 September 2021, 100,884 people had been fully vaccinated with a first dose out of a target population of 1,138,000 who are eligible for vaccination, or 9.93%, with more men having been vaccinated (79%) compared to women (21%) [6].

This study aimed to conduct a national household serosurvey to estimate the nationwide seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the general population, including age group, sex, area of residence, and COVID-19-related characteristics, and to determine trends in infection since the implementation of restrictive measures and vaccination campaigns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This study was designed by WHO united studies [7]. This population-based cross-sectional study was conducted across the entire Gabonese Territory (the main cities of all provinces and villages in rural areas drawn by lot) between 28 November and 20 December 2021.

Gabon is a Central African country with an area of approximately 268,000 km2, located on the edge of the Atlantic Ocean and bordering Congo-Brazzaville, Cameroon, and mainland Equatorial Guinea. Its population, one of the smallest in Central Africa, is estimated at 1,811,079 inhabitants. Gabon is subdivided into nine provinces, with a capital in each province and 52 departments.

2.2. Sample Collection

We randomly selected and invited participants from the general population and areas included in the study according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Individuals of both sexes aged one year and over and residing for more than three months in the study area were eligible to participate in the study. Individuals not living in the locality surveyed, those residing for less than three months, and those who refused to provide informed consent and contraindications for venipuncture were excluded.

Random selection was performed at two levels. The first category concerned the areas to be surveyed. This random selection was made from the national census file of 2013 households distributed in the enumeration areas. Subsequently, in each of the areas selected in the first stage, a sampling interval was calculated with a fixed number of 20 households to be visited. The survey teams randomly chose a starting household and visited it at an established sampling interval. All eligible permanent-resident household members present at the time of the survey team visits were invited to participate. At least one individual from each random household was enrolled in a serological survey.

Before their enrollment in the study, written informed consent from individuals aged 18 years or older or assent from children aged between 12 and 17 years, with written informed consent from their parents or guardians, was obtained.

The study was conducted using the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH-GCP guidelines, and local regulations. The protocol was approved by the National Ethics Committee for Research (0056/2021/P/SG/CNER).

2.3. Procedures

Eligible participants were interviewed to collect information about their sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, recent COVID-19-related symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, fatigue, loss of taste or smell, sore throat), and COVID-19-related exposure and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using the KOBOCOLLECT mobile phone application (kc.kobotoolbox.org) on a questionnaire that included GPS data. Paper questionnaires were also made available to the teams to address difficulties in the operation of tablets and telephones, particularly in rural areas. After the questionnaire was completed, a research nurse collected 5 mL of venous blood in dry tubes. WHO-recommended WANTAI Elisa Kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific antibodies in serum samples. This assay has a sensitivity of 94.36% and a specificity of 100% (https://www.ystwt.cn/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Brochure-Wantai-SARS-CoV-2-Ab-ELISA.pdf, accessed on 10 October 2021). The assay was calibrated with positive and negative quality controls before sample analyses. Assay results higher than or equal to the cutoff index value were interpreted as positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. As part of the quality control, 5% of the 3455 serum samples were re-tested using the same assay by two different laboratory technicians.

2.4. Concordance Test

The manufacturer-reported sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA kits (WANTAI) were 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.3–99.4) and 97.5% (95% CI, 91.3–99.3), respectively. These values were based on 30 SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive serum samples confirmed by a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for both IgM and IgG antibodies and 80 antibody-negative serum samples collected before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

An independent concordance test was performed between WANTAI Elisa and Elecsys®Anti-SARS-CoV-2 using 100 positive and 85 negative randomly selected serum samples tested using the WANTAI Elisa kits. All of the 100 samples positive for WANTAI Elisa were positive for Elecsys®Anti-SARS-CoV-2, corresponding to a collective sensitivity of 100%; 77 of the 85 negative samples tested negative for both of the ELISA kits used, corresponding to a collective specificity of 90.6%.

2.5. Sample Size Estimation and Statistical Analyses

The sample size needed to estimate prevalence in the study was calculated to be 3455 based on a seroprevalence rate of 10%, with a confidence level of 95%, precision of 2%, and calculation factor of 4 (https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSPropor.htm, accessed on 6 September 2021). The required sample size for each area was proportional to each area’s population relative to the country’s total population.

Demographic variables included age, sex, area of residence, and school level. COVID-19-related symptoms included cough, fever, sore throat, headache, diarrhea, altered level of consciousness, and chest pain experienced during the 12 weeks preceding questionnaire completion. Moreover, data on vaccination status were recorded.

The dependent variable was the presence or absence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and the other collected variables were the independent variables.

Data were analyzed using the R statistical software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Qualitative variables were described using percentages, and quantitative variables using mean ± SD, and median (min and max). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for all the prevalence values. The significance level was set at 5%.

3. Results

3.1. Study Profile

Based on the size of the Gabonese population in the nine provinces, 28 localities, including 16 urban and 12 rural areas, were randomly selected to participate in the study. In total, 1672 households were visited during the study period. Approximately 47.2% (789) of the households consented to participating in the study. Of these, 3705 eligible individuals aged 1 year and above were enrolled (Figure 1). Forty-six (46) individuals were excluded from the analysis because of the poor quality of the samples provided. Therefore, 3659 participants were examined for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of participant enrollment.

3.2. Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants

The participants’ main characteristics are shown in Table 1. An analysis of the study population showed that the 30–39 age group (20.6%) was the most represented, followed by the 20–29 (19.5%), 40–49 (15.2%), and 50–59 (11.2%) age groups. Children aged 0–4 (2.7%) and those aged >70 years (3.9%) were the least represented age groups. The mean age was 32.6 years (standard deviation [SD]: 23). The sex ratio was 1 (50.6 F/49.6 M). The sex profile of our baseline population was consistent with that of the entire Gabonese population. Among all participants, 14.88% resided in rural areas, while 85.46% resided in urban areas. This is consistent with the general population, in which 87% live in urban areas and 13% in rural areas.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics by age group.

Age Population Size Sex Mean Age, Years (SD) Comorbid Conditions SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
Male,
n (%)
Yes
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
[1, 4] 95 45 (47.4) 3 (1) 0 (0) 95 (100) 2 (2.1) 93 (97.9)
[5, 9] 221 117 (52.9) 7 (1) 0 (0) 221(100) 1 (0.5) 220 (99.5)
[10, 14] 282 123 (43.6) 12 (1) 1 (0.4) 281 (99.6) 0 (0) 282 (100)
[15, 19] 248 117 (47.2) 17 (1) 5 (2) 243 (98) 4 (1.6) 244 (98.4)
[20, 29] 707 335 (47.4) 25 (3) 28 (4) 679 (96) 42 (5.9) 665 (94.1)
[30, 39] 746 352 (47.2) 34 (3) 32 (4.3) 714 (95.7) 69 (9.2) 677 (90.8)
[40, 49] 550 292 (53.1) 44 (3) 53 (9.6) 497 (90.4) 64 (11.6) 486 (88.4)
[50, 59] 407 227 (55.8) 54 (3) 64 (15.7) 343 (84.3) 40 (9.8) 367 (90.2)
[60, 69] 217 113 (52.1) 64 (3) 57 (26.3) 160 (73.7) 19 (8.8) 198 (91.2)
≥70 144 72 (50) 76 (6) 47 (32.6) 97 (67.4) 9 (6.2) 135 (93.8)
Overall 3659 1793 (49) 32.6 (6) 287 (7.8) 3372 (92.2) 250 (6.8) 3409 (93.2)

SD, standard deviation.

3.3. Seroprevalence in the Study Population

A total of 3175 individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Only 484 participants tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The national seroprevalence was 86.8% (95% CI: [86–88]). No statistical difference in seroprevalence was found between women (87.82%, 95% CI: [86.2–89.2]) and men (86.45%, 95% CI: [84.8–87.9]). Stratification of the study participants by age group showed the highest seroprevalences in the 20–29 and 40–49 age groups at 91.78% (95% CI: 89.5–93.6) and 91.42% (95% CI: 88.7–93.5), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by age group.

Age Population Size Seroprevalence, % (95% CI)
[1, 4] 95 72.6 (62–81)
[5, 9] 221 79.6 (74–85)
[10, 14] 282 87.6 (83–91)
[15, 19] 248 87.5 (83–91)
[20, 29] 707 91.7 (89–94)
[30, 39] 746 88.3 (86–91)
[40, 49] 550 91.1 (88–93)
[50, 59] 407 82.6 (78–86)
[60, 69] 217 81.1 (75–86)
≥70 144 82.6 (75–88)
Overall 3659 86.8 (86–88)

CI, confidence interval; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was similar among the age groups [10, 14], [15, 19], and [30, 39] at 87.6% (95% CI: 83–91), 87.5% (95% CI: 83–91), and 88.3% (95% CI: 84–91), respectively. The seroprevalence was higher in the most active study groups from 10 to 49 years of age (school-age and young workers) and was found to be between 87 and 91%. This seroprevalence was reduced in participants aged 50 years and older and was found to be between 81 and 82.6%. The lowest seroprevalence was found in children, with 72.6% (95% CI: 62–91) for those aged 0–4 years and 79.6% (95% CI: 74–85) for those aged 5–9 years.

Nyanga is a less-populated province in Gabon (Table 3). Only 2% of the study population were enrolled in this province. It also presented the lowest vaccine coverage, with only 4% (three participants) of the study participants from this province being vaccinated. The provinces with the lowest seroprevalence in Gabon, Nyanga and Ngounié (72, 8, and 77.2%, respectively), were located in the south. Moyen Ogooué had the highest vaccine coverage.

Table 3.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by province.

Provinces Population Size Sex Mean Age, Years (SD) Comorbid Conditions SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Seroprevalence,% (95% CI)
Male,
n (%)
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Estuaire 1890 967 (51.2) 36 (16) 173 (9.2) 1717 (90.8) 139 (7.4) 1751 (92.6) 89.9 (88–90)
Haut Ogooué 504 239 (47.4) 33 (21) 21 (4.2) 483 (95.8) 33 (6.5) 471 (93.5) 85.8 (83–89)
Moyen Ogooué 134 59 (44) 29 (21) 21 (15.7) 113 (84.3) 12 (9) 122 (91) 85.2 (78–91)
Ngounié 181 84 (46.4) 33 (23) 18 (9.9) 163 (90.1) 8 (4.4) 173 (95.6) 77.2 (71–83)
Nyanga 75 43 (57.3) 36 (23) 5 (6.7) 70 (93.3) 3 (4) 72 (96) 72.8 (64–81)
Ogooué Ivindo 171 93 (54.4) 27 (21) 13 (7.6) 158 (92.4) 15 (8.8) 156 (91.2) 78.4 (72–84)
Ogooué Lolo 121 61 (50.4) 35 (21) 15 (12.4) 106 (87.6) 9 (7.4) 112 (92.6) 92.7 (87–96)
Ogooué Maritime 272 128 (47.1) 38 (16) 13 (4.8) 259 (95.2) 19 (7) 253 (93) 81.7 (77–86)
Woleu-Ntem 272 121 (44.5) 26 (17) 8 (2.9) 264 (97.1) 13 (4.8) 259 (95.2) 87.5 (83–91)

CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

In the province, only 12 of 134 participants (9%) were vaccinated. The comorbidity rate was also high in this province, with more than 15% of the participants having at least one comorbidity. Estuaire is the most populated province in Gabon, and more than 50% of the study population was recruited from this province. The vaccine coverage here was 7.4%, and 9.2% of the study participants had at least one comorbidity.

The prevalence of seropositivity varied most substantially according to the presence of COVID-19 symptoms in the previous three months, history of COVID-19 diagnosis, and immunization records (Table 4).

Table 4.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by history of respiratory symptoms and immunization records.

Characteristics Population Size Number of Positive Seroprevalence, % (95% CI)
History of respiratory symptoms in previous three months
yes 1896 1697 89.5 (88–91)
No 1719 1478 86.0 (84–88)
History of COVID-19 diagnosis
yes 74 65 87.8 (79–94)
no 3116 2707 86.9 (86–88)
do not know 425 378 89.0 (86–92)
Immunization records
yes 251 234 93.2 (90–96)
no 3364 2916 86.7 (86–88)

The four main cities in this province were selected for this study: Akanda, Owendo, Libreville, and Ntoum (Table 5). Owendo had the highest rate of comorbidities, with 19% of participants from that city presenting at least one comorbidity. The seroprevalence was also high in that city (92.8%). Akiéni is a small rural area within the Haut-Ogooué province. Eleven participants were enrolled in the study. All the patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (100% seroprevalence). Only Lambaréné (Moyen-Ogooué) was the only place a seroprevalence < 70% in Gabon. The remaining cities had seroprevalence rates ranging from 84% to 100%.

Table 5.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by city.

Cities Population Sex Mean Age, Years (SD) Comorbid Conditions SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Seroprevalence, %
(95% CI)
Male,
n (%)
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Akanda 75 37 (49.3) 30 (17) 8 (10.7) 67 (89.3) 10 (13.3) 65 (86.7) 89.3 (80–95)
Akieni 11 7 (63.6) 34 (17) 0 (0) 11 (100) 1 (9.1) 10 (90.9) 100 (68–100)
Bitam 91 46 (50.5) 24 (15) 1 (1.1) 90 (98.9) 4 (4.4) 87 (95.6) 92.3 (84–97)
Franceville 220 99 (45) 31 (19) 12 (5.5) 208 (94.5) 20 (9.1) 200 (90.9) 94.5 (91–97)
Koulamoutou 59 31 (52.5) 30 (19) 6 (10.2) 53 (89.8) 9 (15.3) 50 (84.7) 96.6 (87–99)
Lambaréné 102 44 (43.1) 26 (21) 10 (9.8) 92 (90.2) 10 (9.8) 92 (90.2) 67.6 (58–76)
Libreville 1447 751 (51.9) 35 (15) 124 (8.6) 1323 (91.4) 121 (8.4) 1326 (91.6) 90 (88–92)
Makokou 118 62 (52.5) 26 (19) 8 (6.8) 110 (93.2) 15 (12.7) 103 (87.3) 84.7 (77–91)
Moanda 83 31 (37.3) 23 (15) 0 (0) 83 (100) 1 (1.2) 82 (98.8) 85.5 (76–92)
Mouila 105 47 (44.8) 26 (20) 7 (6.7) 98 (93.3) 6 (5.7) 99 (94.3) 88.6 (81–94)
Ntoum 161 85 (52.8) 39 (18) 9 (5.6) 152 (94.4) 3 (1.9) 158 (98.1) 88.2 (82–93)
Okondja 57 35 (61.4) 35 (14) 5 (8.8) 52 (91.2) 8 (14) 49 (86) 86 (74–93)
Owendo 166 73 (44) 39 (15) 32 (19.3) 134 (80.7) 3 (1.8) 163 (98.2) 92.8 (87–96)
Oyem 139 57 (41) 27 (18) 6 (4.3) 133 (95.7) 9 (6.5) 130 (93.5) 86.3 (79–91)
Port-Gentil 213 94 (44.1) 37 (15) 10 (4.7) 203 (95.3) 18 (8.5) 195 (91.5) 86 (81–91)
Tchibanga 31 13 (41.9) 26 (17) 0 (0) 31 (100) 3 (9.7) 28 (90.3) 87.1 (69–96)

CI, confidence interval, SARS-CoV-2, SD, standard deviation; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

4. Discussion

Gabon is one of the countries most affected by SARS-CoV-2 in Central Africa. However, in the absence of seroprevalence studies, the actual infection rate in Gabon remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies across Gabon. This study sampled largely populated and geographically distributed regions. All of the main Gabonese cities (urban) and randomly selected rural (village) areas were visited within 15 days. The National seroprevalence was estimated to be 86%, providing estimates of the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Gabonese people.

This is the first study to reveal a high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence with shallow vaccine coverage at the population or country level (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html, accessed on 10 July 2022). The results presented here are not surprising, as many studies have shown the rapid progression of SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in the African population. The data in this study were collected 21 months after the first SARS-CoV-2 infection in Gabon (March 2020 to November 2021). The seroprevalence observed in our study might be explained by the modes of transmission of this virus (airborne) and by the low compliance of the general population with applied health regulations such as physical distancing and wearing masks [8].

Sagara et al. collected blood samples from one urban and two rural communities in Mali during two separate visits within six months [9]. Within this period, the seroprevalence was multiplied by more than three in urban areas, from 19% during the first visit (July to October 2020) to 70% during the second visit (December 2020 to January 2021). A tenfold increase was observed in the rural areas during the same period. This corroborates the observations made in South Africa, where the authors collected blood from urban and rural cohorts every two months from July 2020 to March 2021 [10]. During this nine-month study, the seroprevalence increased from 1% to 26% in rural settings and from 15% to 41% in urban communities after the two waves of COVID-19. A hospital-based study enrolling patients and parents visiting a health center in Libreville (Gabon) revealed a seroprevalence of 36% six months after the first detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Gabon [11]. Although morbidity and mortality were low in Central Africa, this region was found to have the highest seroprevalence in a systematic review aimed at estimating global and regional SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide [12]. Possible explanations for the low mortality in Africa include the demographic pyramid, trained immunity, genetics, and broader sociocultural dynamics [13,14,15]. Moreover, many African countries have also implemented partial or complete travel restrictions, which further reduce the introduction rate of imported cases, thus making it easier to identify and isolate initial cases and their contacts and limit pockets of transmission [16].

The data presented in the current study, showing naturally acquired immunity in the Gabonese population after 21 months of COVID-19 emergence, corroborates the results of a previous survey. The SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate in urban and rural settings is high in Central Africa, especially in Gabon. Further studies are needed to determine the source of the observed resistance to COVID-19 in the Gabonese population. Indeed, of the 1,622,064 tests carried out, only 48,981 positive cases were recorded, with 306 deaths.

The presented data showed the highest transmission rate among school-aged and young workers aged 10 to 49 years. This observation can be explained by the fact that the younger population may have adopted fewer safety measures to limit transmission. Notably, the rates of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 are low in this age range. Morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 have been associated with age structure and co-endemicity with other pathogens, including helminths and other related viruses [17]. This profile was already shown in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in a seroprevalence study conducted in Kenya eight months after the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 to this country [18]. The seroprevalence was found to be between 30 and 39% in the age group between 10 and 59 years old but 22% in participants older than 60 years. The lowest prevalence was observed in the younger population (<10 years old) at 19%. Some studies have shown the highest seroprevalence in older population [19,20].

5. Conclusions

The presented data show a high transmission rate of the first SARS-CoV-2 in Gabon. The virus was first detected in March 2020 in Gabon. After 21 months, the population presented with a high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, indicating a high prevalence of asymptomatic or mildly unreported COVID-19 cases in the country.

Acknowledgments

We thank all personnel who helped with data and sample gathering in the areas involved and the participants with whom this study was not possible. COVID-19 Gabonese Group: Amel Kévin Alame-Emane, Mbomo Steeve Hermes, Joseph Ndanga Tiagni, Ayong More, Ismael Pierrick Mikelet Boussoukou, Anicet Christel Maloupazoa Siawaya, Juliette Atsame, Aliette Olivia Matsingang, Rodigue Bikangui, Raphael Edward Ndjonkou Siawaya, Ulrick Leger Davy Mouangala, Davy-Christ Angoune-Ndong, Arnaud Mouhamed Mohod, Anais Malandou, Francis Nziengui-Nziengui, Franck Mounioko, Lady Charlène Kouna, Cherone Mbani Mpega Ntigui, Jean Claude Biteghe Bi Esoone, Roméo Karl Imboumy-Limoukou.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., B.R.A., H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; methodology, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., A.M.N. (Amandine Mveang Nzoghe), B.R.A., H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; software, E.-B.N.; validation, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., B.R.A., A.M.N. (Armel Mintsa-Ndong), H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; formal analysis, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., B.R.A., H.M.-K., A.N.-M., M.J.V.M.M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.-B.L.-D., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; investigation, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., A.M.N. (Amandine Mveang Nzoghe), H.M.-K., H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M.; resources, I.A. and M.M.B.; data curation, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N. and E.-B.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., A.M.N. (Amandine Mveang Nzoghe), K.M.M.N.-M.; writing—review and editing, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., A.M.N. (Amandine Mveang Nzoghe), B.R.A., A.M.N. (Armel Mintsa-Ndong), H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M., A.N.-M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.-B.L.-D., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; supervision, S.Z.-A., P.E.-N., R.A., S.L.O.-L., A.M.N. (Amandine Mveang Nzoghe), B.R.A., A.M.N. (Armel Mintsa-Ndong), H.M.-K., M.J.V.M.M., A.N.-M., A.B.A.A., K.M.M.N.-M., M.M.B., I.A., J.-B.L.-D., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N.; project administration, S.L.O.-L., S.Z.-A. and E.-B.N.; funding acquisition, S.Z.-A., S.L.O.-L., J.F.D.S., A.A.A. and E.-B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH-GCP guidelines, and local regulations. The study protocol was approved by the National Ethics Committee for Research (0056/2021/P/SG/CNER approved on 17 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Before enrollment in the study, written informed consent was obtained from individuals aged 18 years or older or assent from children aged between 12 and 17 years, with written informed consent from their parents or guardians.

Data Availability Statement

A subset of the key-anonymized individual data collected during the study, along with a data dictionary, is available upon request from the corresponding author at ngoungou2001@yahoo.fr after a proposal with a signed data access agreement is approved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This study received funding and technical support from the WHO (Unity Studies).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Rodriguez-Morales A.J., Cardona-Ospina J.A., Gutiérrez-Ocampo E., Villamizar-Peña R., Holguin-Rivera Y., Escalera-Antezana J.P., Alvarado-Arnez L.E., Bonilla-Aldana D.K., Franco-Paredes C., Henao-Martinez A.F., et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020;34:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72,314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zoa-Assoumou S., Ndeboko B., Manouana G.P., Houechenou R.M.A., Bikangui R., Mveang-Nzoghe A., Ondo G.N., Mbongo-Kama E., Lell B., Abe H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 emerging variants in Africa: View from Gabon. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e349. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00125-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iroungou B.A., Mangouka L.G., Bivigou-Mboumba B., Moussavou-Boundzanga P., Obame-Nkoghe J., Nzigou Boucka F., Mouinga-Ondeme A., Aghokeng A.F., Tchoua R., Pineau P., et al. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Severity, Clinical Outcomes, and Mortality of COVID-19 Infection in Gabon. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021;4:e2124190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO . Coordinated Global Research Roadmap: 2019 Novel Coronavirus. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. [(accessed on 14 May 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/coordinated-global-research-roadmap.pdf?sfvrsn=21b0f5c4_1&download=true. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. [(accessed on 17 June 2024)]. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/gabon/communiqu%C3%A9s-de-presse/le-gabon-recoit-100-620-doses-de-vaccin-pfizer-expediees-le-covax#:~:text=L'arriv%C3%A9e%20du%20vaccin%20Pfizer,repose%20sur%20le%20vaccin%20Sinopharm.
  • 7.Bergeri I., Lewis H.C., Subissi L., Nardone A., Valenciano M., Cheng B., Glonti K., Williams B., Omolade Abejirinde I.-O., Simniceanu A., et al. Early epidemiological investigations: World Health Organization UNITY protocols provide a standardized and timely international investigation framework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses. 2022;16:7–13. doi: 10.1111/irv.12915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murhekar M.V., Bhatnagar T., Selvaraju S., Saravanakumar V., Vivian Thangaraj J.W., Shah N., Kumar M.S., Rade K., Sabarinathan R., Asthana S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in India, August-September 2020: Findings from the second nationwide household serosurvey. Lancet Glob. Health. 2021;9:e257–e266. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30544-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sagara I., Woodford J., Kone M., Assadou M.H., Katile A., Attaher O., Zeguime A., Doucoure M., Higbee E., Lane J., et al. Rapidly Increasing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroprevalence and Limited Clinical Disease in 3 Malian Communities: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022;74:1030–1038. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kleynhans J., Tempia S., Wolter N., von Gottberg A., Bhiman J.N., Buys A., Moyes J., McMorrow M.L., Kahn K., Gómez-Olivé F.X., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in a Rural and Urban Household Cohort during First and Second Waves of Infections, South Africa, July 2020–March 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021;27:3020–3029. doi: 10.3201/eid2712.211465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mveang Nzoghe A., Leboueny M., Kuissi Kamgaing E., Maloupazoa Siawaya A.C., Bongho E.C., Mvoundza Ndjindji O., Padzys G.-S., Ndeboko B., Ategbo S., Djoba Siawaya J.F. Circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N)-protein antibodies and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-protein antibodies in an African setting: Herd immunity, not there yet! BMC Res. Notes. 2021;14:152. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05570-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rostami A., Sepidarkish M., Fazlzadeh A., Mokdad A.H., Sattarnezhad A., Esfandyari S., Riahi S.M., Mollalo A., Dooki M.E., Bayani M., et al. Update on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: Regional and worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021;27:1762–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mbow M., Lell B., Jochems S.P., Cisse B., Mboup S., Dewals B.G., Jaye A., Dieye A. COVID-19 in Africa: Dampening the storm? Science. 2020;369:624–626. doi: 10.1126/science.abd3902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wamai R.G., Hirsch J.L., Van Damme W., Alnwick D., Bailey R.C., Hodgins S., Alam U., Anyona M. What Could Explain the Lower COVID-19 Burden in Africa despite Considerable Circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:8638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nyawale H.A., Moremi N., Mohamed M., Njwalila J., Silago V., Krone M., Konje E.T., Mirambo M.M., Mshana S.E. High Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Mwanza, Northwestern Tanzania: A Population-Based Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:11664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jarju S., Wenlock R.D., Danso M., Jobe D., Jagne Y.J., Darboe A., Kumado M., Jallow Y., Touray M., Ceesay E.A., et al. High SARS-CoV-2 incidence and asymptomatic fraction during Delta and Omicron BA.1 waves in The Gambia. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:3814. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48098-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Njenga M.K., Dawa J., Nanyingi M., Gachohi J., Ngere I., Letko M., Otieno C.F., Gunn B.M., Osoro E. Why is There Low Morbidity and Mortality of COVID-19 in Africa? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020;103:564–569. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ngere I., Dawa J., Hunsperger E., Otieno N., Masika M., Amoth P., Makayotto L., Nasimiyu C., Gunn B.M., Nyawanda B., et al. High seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 but low infection fatality ratio eight months after introduction in Nairobi, Kenya. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;112:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Poustchi H., Darvishian M., Mohammadi Z., Shayanrad A., Delavari A., Bahadorimonfared A., Eslami S., Javanmard S.H., Shakiba E., Somi M.H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in the general population and high-risk occupational groups across 18 cities in Iran: A population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:473–481. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30858-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nwosu K., Fokam J., Wanda F., Mama L., Orel E., Ray N., Meke J., Tassegning A., Takou D., Mimbe E., et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence and associated risk factors in an urban district in Cameroon. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5851. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25946-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

A subset of the key-anonymized individual data collected during the study, along with a data dictionary, is available upon request from the corresponding author at ngoungou2001@yahoo.fr after a proposal with a signed data access agreement is approved.


Articles from Viruses are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES