Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Oct 27;14:25662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75341-0

Gross morphological and ultrasonographic dimensions of normal feline kidney with reference to resistive index

Mohamed Ahmed Maher 1,, Laura Palacio 2, Juan C Henao 2, Samar H Elsharkawy 3
PMCID: PMC11514209  PMID: 39465251

Abstract

Ultrasonography with color Doppler is the most quantitative analysis method for intra-renal parameters. There is a wide variation between authors in the measurement site and referencing the inter-lobar resistivity index (RI) in felines. Our objective is to morphometrically and ultrasonographically investigate the normal renal dimensions and vasculatures and draw up a normal reference value for the renal inter-lobar artery resistivity index (RI) using a Pulsed wave-Doppler ultrasonography. A total of twelve adult domestic cats were sedated and treated according to IACUC regulation guidelines to be examined using Doppler ultrasound. The same cats were used for morphometric investigation and divided into three groups regarding the used technique. The size difference between the right and left kidneys is slight, measuring 17 g (weight), 3.65 ± 0.06 cm (length), 2.54 ± 0.08 cm (width), and 2.21 ± 0.03 cm (thickness) for the right kidney, and about 15 g, 3.42 ± 0.06 cm, 2.32 ± 0.05 cm, and 2.13 ± 0.03 cm for the left one, respectively. There are three patterns of renal arteries’ point of origin. The mean RI values of both kidneys were 0.57 ± 0.08 (0.50–0.67) in the right kidney and 0.60 ± 0.08 (0.51–0.69) in the left kidney. The gross examination and ultrasonography measurements did not have a statistically different effect on the actual renal dimensions. Moreover, 0.69 is considered the standard resistivity index (RI) threshold of the feline inter-lobar artery with no correlation to the animal’s body weight.

Keywords: Doppler ultrasonography, Resistive index, Inter-lobar artery, Anatomy, Cat

Subject terms: Nephrology, Urology

Introduction

The kidney is a fundamental organ for maintaining water and electrolyte equilibrate in individuals and various animal species. The second most important function of this organ is to eliminate multiple harmful metabolic waste products, specifically nitrogenous substances like urea and creatinine1. In both urology and nephrology practice, renal parameters are highly useful diagnostic indicators for both individuals and animals2. Due to their close structural mimicry of the human kidney, pig kidneys are more commonly used in urologic experimental studies3 while cats are the most appropriate models for bilateral renal ischemia4.

The kidneys are vascularized through the renal vasculatures. The left renal artery is shorter and originates after the right one5. Before entering the opposite hilus, each artery is divided into dorsal and ventral divisions in dogs6,7, in cats2, in rats8, and in goats9. In the cat, there are 4 branches for each dorsal and ventral branch, while in the dog, there are 2 branches for each. The primary branch is made up of the dorsal and ventral divisions, which are then subdivided into inter-lobar, arcuate, and interlobular arteries, respectively2,5,9,10. In certain canine kidneys, the renal hilus receives two or more renal arteries11 and from one to six primary branches12.

A decrease in renal arterial diastolic flow is usually indicative of increased renal arterial resistance, which is linked to acute renal dysfunctions like tubular necrosis, impaired perfusion, and obstructions. Practically, the resistivity index (RI) is frequently ascertained by Doppler ultrasonography because it is the most affordable diagnostic protocol. The renal arterial system’s inter-lobar and arcuate expressions at the hilus or cortico-medullary zone are the source of the signal-dependent nature of this technique. During systolic and diastolic blood flow, the prevalence shift is utilized to give a proportional measurement of velocity because small arteries are not accessible. Normally, the resistive index referencing in cats does not exceed 0.70. So, the elevated index indicates an elevated resilience and subsequently, a distinct renal disease such as renal arterial stenosis1317.

This investigation intends to scrutinize the morphometric anatomical parameters of the feline kidneys and related vasculatures in adult domestic cats in Egypt and pinpoint the variations between other studied mammals. Moreover, to set a referenced metric for the feline renal dimensions and inter-lobar arteries RI for each kidney, using B-mode and pulsed wave-Doppler ultrasonography. Finally, comparing dimensions driven from ultrasonography to actual measurements obtained from gross morphology.

Methods

Ultrasonography

Our study included 12 adult healthy cats of different sexes (6 males and 6 females) and weights (2.65∼5.3 kg) based on physical, ultrasonographic and laboratory investigations. The ultrasonographic survey was conducted by placing the cats in a dorsal position after IM administration of xylazine (1 mg/kg). The ventral abdomen was lavishly coated with a hydro-soluble gel to permit sound conduction. The sonographic scanning procedure was executed with a stationary articulated arm (Mindray DC-40, Shenzhen, China) with a micro-convex (5-9 MHz) transducer. All kidneys were assessed in B-Mode through multiple axial scans made at 0.5-cm intervals, determining its size, shape, echotexture, cortex: medulla ratio and evaluation of renal pelvis and ureter. Renal parameters including width, length, height and thickness (cortical and medullary) were obtained at three planes (dorsal, transverse and sagittal planes)18,19. The renal length and height (cm) were determined from the sagittal plane (Fig. 8) at the frame where echogenic parallel segments formed by pelvic diverticulum were clearly spotted. The renal width (cm) and height (cm) were measured from the transverse plane (Fig. 9), where the “C”-sign of the renal crest (Fig. 9/RC) was visualized18. On the dorsal plane (Fig. 10) where the kidney in a true bean shape with the renal sinus in the far field, both renal length and width were recorded. At the sagittal plane, the cortical thickness (cm) was determined as the distance connecting the renal margin to the corticomedullary junction, while the medullary thickness (cm) was determined as the interface between the corticomedullary junction to the renal pelvis19.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

A sagittal plane of the kidney showing L: length, H: height, C: cortex, M: medulla.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

A transverse plane of the kidney showing renal crest (RC) appeared as “C”-sign. H: height, W: width.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

A dorsal plane of the kidney showing H: height, W: width.

Renal inter-lobar arteries were appointed using color flow-Doppler then pulsed wave- Doppler tracings were obtained by positioning a gate of 2.5 mm wide over the artery, setting the wall filter to 125 Hz, and choosing the smallest scale. Finally, the peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic (EDV) velocities were averaged from three consecutive waveforms, and RI was calculated automatically using the following formula18.

graphic file with name M1.gif

Furthermore, all renal parameters were compared with actual parameters obtained from gross morphology.

Anatomical studies

The present investigation was conducted on the same twelve adult domestic cats of both sexes that appeared healthy by physical and ultrasonographic examination. All the cats were sedated with xylazine (1 mg/kg), and anesthesia was induced using ketamine (20 mg/kg) followed by Heparin (5000 IU/ml) injected intramuscularly to prevent coagulation. To overcome the pain, an overdose of sodium thiopental 2.5% was used then exsanguination following the rules established by the institutional animal care and use committee. The institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) of Cairo University has approved the present work with an IACUC number of (VET CU 03162023730). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and were reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. A cannula through the common carotid artery was fixed to clear the remaining blood within the vessels using a phosphate-buffered saline of 0.9% followed by a buffered formalin solution of 10%. For studying the renal angioarchitecture, the animals were divided into 3 groups according to the used technique with 4 cats for each. The radiographic group; using a contrast medium as Omnipaque™, injected through the abdominal aorta just prior to the cranial mesenteric artery then immediately radiographed using 55 KVP 30–70 MA, 0.5 s and FFD70 cm. The latex-injected group; using red paint milky latex injected as the radiographic group and then immersed in 10% formalin solution for fixation. The corrosion-cast group; using KEMAPOXY 150 (2 A/1B) was mixed in a ratio of 2 A:1B then injected immediately by manual push using syringes of 50 ml before solidification in a room temperature for 48 h then maceration of the cast was applied by using 40% KOH for 5 days. After that, the specimens were dissected and cleaned carefully.

The specimens were anatomically dissected in situ then removed from the sub-lumbar region to be measured for weight and related dimensions before maceration using KOH solution then photographed using a digital photo camera Nikon Coolpix L310 14.1 Megapixels. The nomenclature used in this study was adopted according to Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017), as well as those used by previous literature on carnivores.

Statistical analysis

Pulsed wave- Doppler measurements for both right and left inter-lobar arteries were statistically analyzed with IBM SPSS statistics version 26 to determine intragroup variability. The comprehensive data were presented as (mean ± SD) and all P values lesser than 0.05 were considered significantly different.

Results

Morphometry of feline kidneys

The feline kidney appeared bean in outline with a smooth surface externally and asymmetrically localized in the sub-lumbar region both kidneys are situated under the first three lumbar transverse processes (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4) with rounded cranial and caudal poles, dorsal and ventral aspects, lateral convex and medial hilar concave boundaries (Fig. 5). The hilar border is depressed at its middle receiving arterial supply, nerve plexus and emitting venous drainage, ureter, and lymphatics. Both kidneys are covered by thick fatty capsules and thin tight fibrous ones that reveal the characteristic bright-blue feather-like appearance of the sub-capsular veins (Figs. 1 and 5).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A photograph showing ventral view of abdominal cavity of cat showing kidney position, abdominal aorta and renal vasculature. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A photograph showing ventral view of abdominal cavity of cat showing kidney position, abdominal aorta and renal artery ramification through the kidneys. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A radiograph showing dorso-ventral view of abdominal cavity of cat showing kidney position, renal artery point of origin and its ramification through the kidneys. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A radiograph showing dorso-ventral view of abdominal cavity of cat showing kidney position, renal artery point of origin and its ramification through the kidneys. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

A photograph showing ventral view of cat kidneys injected with red-colored latex. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Morphometry of renal arterial supply

The Aa. Renales dexter et sinister originate from the sideward margin of the aorta abdominalis, measuring about 0.33 ± 0.02 cm in diameter, midway between the 2nd and 3rd lumbar vertebral bodies (Figs. 2 and 3). The renal arteries’ point of origin revealed main three patterns of distribution. In the 1st pattern, there are 7 cats out of 12 with a percentage of 58.3%, where the A. renalis sinister originated earlier than the A. renalis dexter (Figs. 1 and 6). In the 2nd pattern, there are 3 cats out of 12 with a percentage of 25%, where the Aa. Renales dexter et sinister have emerged at the same level opposite to each other (Figs. 2, 3 and 7). In the 3rd pattern, the A. renalis dexter originated earlier than the sinister one in 2 cats with a percentage of 16.6% (Fig. 5). Both renal arteries are directed laterally toward their renal hilus after dividing into two primary divisions; dorsal (Fig. 6/20) and ventral branches (Fig. 6/21).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

A photograph showing a cast of red-colored latex revealing the distribution of renal arteries through the renal parenchyma of cat. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

A photograph showing a corrosion cast of red-colored epoxy revealing the distribution of renal arteries through the renal parenchyma of cat. 1, right kidney; 2, left kidney; 3, peri-renal fat; 4, sub-capsular veins; 5, right adrenal gland; 6, left adrenal gland; 7, renal lymph nodes; 8, sublumbar muscles; 9, renal hilus; 10, renal pelvis; 11, cortico-medullary zone; 12, Cortex; 13, renal capsule; 14, ureter; 15, 1st lumbar vertebra; 16, 3rd lumbar vertebra; 17, Abdominal aorta; 18, right renal artery; 19, left renal artery; 20, dorsal primary branch; 21, Ventral primary branch; 22, inter-lobar artery; 23, arcuate artery; 24, Inter-lobular artery; 25, caudal adrenal arteries; 26, ureteric branch; 27, capsular branch; 28, lumbar arteries.

There is no accessory renal artery has been observed in all studied cats. The renal artery length from its root to the primary splitting up is 1.79 ± 0.35 cm and 1.28 ± 0.47 cm for the right and left renal arteries, respectively. The diameter of the right and left renal arteries is 0.17 ± 0.03 cm and 0.15 ± 0.02 cm, respectively. The adrenal glands (Fig. 2/5, 6) and renal lymph nodes (Fig. 1/7) receive fine arterial branches that originated in 8 cats from the corresponding renal artery (Fig. 1/25) while in 4 cats, the left gland is irrigated by the left renal artery, and the right gland from a separate branch originated from the abdominal aorta (Fig. 2/25). The dorsal and ventral primary divisions of each renal artery are divided into cranial and caudal branches that are further divided into about 3–5 inter-lobar arteries for each (Fig. 4/22). The dorsal and ventral inter-lobar arteries are radiated from the renal hilus, enclosing the renal pelvis at its dorsal and ventral aspects, through the renal medulla till reaching the cortico-medullary zone where each inter-lobar artery is divided into two arcuate arteries (Fig. 6/23). The arcuate arteries gave rise to tiny interlobular arteries (Fig. 6/24) with a larger number than the arcuate arteries, distributed to the periphery of the renal parenchyma with no terminal anastomosis between them.

Ultrasonographic evaluation

The renal dimensions, length, height, and width, of twelve domestic cats, were presented in (Table 1), as measured by different ultrasonographic angles with their resistive indices (RIs). The ultrasound-observed renal dimensions were identical to the actual dimensions measured by gross observations in (Table 2), with a non-significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Kidney dimensions and resistive index of 12 domestic cats measured in different ultrasonographic angles:

Renal dimensions Sagittal plane Transverse plane Dorsal plane
Length R 4.23 ± 0.84 N/A 3.86 ± 0.93
L 3.90 ± 1.10 N/A 4.06 ± 0.95
Height R 2.02 ± 0.62 2.07 ± 0.32 N/A
L 2.12 ± 0.67 2.34 ± 0.51 N/A
Width R N/A 2.52 ± 0.29 2.23 ± 0.41
L N/A 2.73 ± 0.66 1.96 ± 0.49
Cortical thickness R 0.53 ± 0.26 N/A N/A
L 0.55 ± 0.23 N/A N/A
Medullary thickness R 0.33 ± 0.11 N/A N/A
L 0.41 ± 0.18 N/A N/A
RI R 0.57 ± 0.08 (0.50–0.67) N/A N/A
L 0.60 ± 0.08 (0.51–0.69) N/A N/A

Table 2.

Actual sizes of renal dimensions of 12 domestic cats measured in necropsy using vernier calipers.

Renal dimensions Actual size (Mean ± SD)
Renal artery length R 1.79 ± 0.35
L 1.28 ± 0.47
Renal artery diameter R 0.17 ± 0.03
L 0.15 ± 0.02
Kidney length R 3.65 ± 0.06
L 3.42 ± 0.06
Kidney thickness R 2.21 ± 0.03
L 2.13 ± 0.03
Kidney width R 2.54 ± 0.08
L 2.32 ± 0.05

Unit: cm; SD: standard deviation, L: left, R: right.

Both kidneys showed normal sonographic appearance: smooth in texture, well-defined, oval, and had a thin, linear, hyperechoic renal capsule. The cortex of the right kidney was consistently echoic and somewhat isoechoic or hypoechoic when compared to the liver parenchyma, whereas, the cortex of the left kidney was consistently hypoechoic when compared to the splenic parenchyma, which appeared clear in the sagittal plane (Fig. 8). Linear echogenicities, such as recesses or diverticula, cross the medulla, forming a thin linear hyperechoic band, which is called the “C-sign” of the common renal crest in the transverse plane (Fig. 9). A series of dorsal scans were performed at intervals of 0.5 cm until the kidney’s most lateral border was obscured (Fig. 10).

The right kidney measures 17 g in weight, 3.65 ± 0.06 cm in length, 2.54 ± 0.08 cm in width, and 2.21 ± 0.03 cm in thickness. The left kidney measures 15 g, 3.42 ± 0.06 cm, 2.32 ± 0.05 cm, and 2.13 ± 0.03 cm, respectively. The mean thicknesses (mean ± SD) of the renal cortex and medulla were 0.53 ± 0.26 cm in the right kidney, 0.55 ± 0.23 cm in the left kidney, and 0.33 ± 0.11 cm in the right kidney and 0.41 ± 0.18 cm in the left kidney, respectively. The mean RI values of both kidneys were 0.57 ± 0.08 in the right kidney and 0.60 ± 0.08 in the left kidney (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Determination of Resistivity index (RI) using color Doppler echocardiography.

The cat populations included in this investigation ranged widely in body weight (2.65–5.3 kg), the correlation index was determined by statistically analyzing the measured kidney dimensions (Table 3). The body weight and renal medullary thickness had a higher degree of correlation with the renal dimensions, while the degree of correlation to the renal cortical thickness was low.

Table 3.

Coefficient of correlation of body weight to renal dimensions.

Renal dimensions Sagittal plane Transverse plane Dorsal plane
Length R 0.662 N/A 0.702
L 0.803 N/A 0.588
Height R 0.736 0.429 N/A
L 0.697 0.888* N/A
Width R N/A 0.613 0.556
L N/A 0.807 0.901*
Cortical thickness R 0.200 N/A N/A
L 0.535 N/A N/A
Medullary thickness R 0.746 N/A N/A
L 0.959** N/A N/A

Coefficient of correlation below 0.3, is considered as weak33. N/A; not applicable, L: left, R: right, * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Discussion

The kidneys of our studied cats are smooth, bean-shaped, retroperitoneal, and asymmetrically, localized in the sub-lumbar region with three patterns of kidney positioning while previous literature2,9,12,20,21 had been reported that the right kidney is normally extending a little more cranial than the left one and covered by a thick fatty capsule. The current study revealed that the right kidney measurements were 3.65 ± 0.03 cm, 2.54 ± 0.04 cm, and 2.21 ± 0.01 cm in length, width, and thickness, respectively and the left kidney were 3.42 ± 0.03 cm, 2.32 ± 0.02 cm, and 2.13 ± 0.15 cm, respectively. Meanwhile, the cat’s right kidney measured about 3.54 ± 0.46 cm, 2.45 ± 0.27 cm, and 2.05 ± 0.23 cm, respectively and the left kidney were 3.52 ± 0.44 cm, 2.46 ± 0.28 cm, and 2.19 ± 0.31 cm, respectively21. The present study agreed with the previous reports that the right kidney was slightly heavier than the left kidney with the renal arteries originating from each side of the abdominal aorta8,21,22. On the other hand, in cats, confirmed that the left kidney was larger than the right one, especially in the male’s antimere2. In addition, in rabbits23, observed that the left kidneys were more affected by formalin fixation than the right kidneys in the form of decreased right kidney thickness.

Our observations revealed three patterns of renal arteries originating from the abdominal aorta. The 1st pattern, where the left renal artery emitted before the right one, the 2nd pattern, where the two arteries originated opposite to each other and the 3rd pattern, the right artery departed before the left one. In dogs12 reported the 3rd pattern in 69.23% and the 2nd pattern in 30.76% of studied dogs. However, in rabbits24,25 and in cats20 reported the 3rd pattern only with the right renal artery was longer than the left one, due to the position of the right kidney which was higher than the left one. Although the left renal artery was reported to be longer than the right one in cats26, some researchers found the opposite of this finding in some species of cats27,28. However, in all cases, our investigation was in agreement with8 that the right renal artery was slightly longer than the left one, due to the location of the aorta being left to the median plane of the abdominal cavity as humans. The present observations were in agreement with the previous reports in rabbits29, in goats30, in cats26, in pigs31, in wolves32 and in rats8 that there was a single renal artery in all examined kidneys. Otherwise, multiple renal arteries were examined and reported in humans33 and in dogs12,22.

Our results were similar to the previous reports that the primary division of each renal artery was a dorsal and ventral branches8,9,26,32,34,]. But others found that the primary division of the pig renal artery was a cranial and a caudal branch in 93.4% of cases35. While in humans36, recorded the primary divisions as anterior and posterior branches. Furthermore, in goats9, reported an accessory renal artery before the primary division. The results which not simulate the present study in cats. The current investigation revealed that the dorsal and ventral branches of each renal artery were divided into two segmental arteries, known as a cranial and a caudal branch which further divided to give off the inter-lobar arteries. These results were in agreement with8,11. On the contrary, other authors as in rabbits29, in goats30 in sheep27, and in wolves11, reported that the dorsal and ventral branches of renal arteries directly gave off the inter-lobar arteries.

Our observations in the present study were most relevant to those reported previously in cats11,37. The current renal dimensions obtained in the dorsal, sagittal and transverse planes were comparable to normal ranges for feline kidneys18,35,39. In the present study, Doppler hemodynamic changes were excluded by assessing the RI of the inter-lobar or arcuate arteries for each kidney. Our measurements were taken during sedation with an Alpha 2-adreneroceptor agonist, deemed reliable based on prior research showing no significant difference in renal PI and RI between awake and sedated cats using the same drug category38. RI for both kidneys showed no difference from the previous studies18,35,4044. Normally, the resistive index differences between the right and left kidneys are not significant as reported in the previous studies4244, however, a later study demonstrated that RI differed significantly between both kidney which was attributed to technical errors or even a clinically unappreciated kidney injury45. Our study population showed no difference in the RI between the right and left kidney as described before35,4244.

There is a paucity of data on comparing actual renal dimensions with measurements obtained via ultrasound. Nonetheless, a study in 2008 demonstrated no difference between the two methods in domestic short hair cats which aligned with the findings of our study35. Renal measurements of the feline resistive index (RI) of the renal inter-lobar artery in the current investigation were nearly similar to those reported by41 in domestic short-hair cats where the RI values were 0.58 in the right kidney and 0.59 in the left kidney with no significant difference between different groups due to gender and right and left kidneys. Meanwhile, in cats18 reported the RI values as 0.75 ± 0.07 for the right kidney and 0.71 ± 0.05 for the left kidney.

Conclusion

There is no difference between ultrasound driven renal measurements and actual renal measurements assessed by gross morphometrical analysis. RI obtained from renal inter-lobar arteries via pulsed wave Doppler is a body weight independent measurement in the feline population. In addition, we suggest 0.69 as an upper limit of a reference value of the resistivity index (RI) obtained in renal inter-lobar arteries of both kidneys in the studied cats with no correlation between the renal resistivity index and the animal sex or body weight.

Author contributions

MMA, LP, and JCH: methodology; conceptualization; data curation; data analysis; MMA and SHE: writing, reviewing; all authors are included in final manuscript editing and revision.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This work has been approved by the Institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) with IACUC number of VET CU 03162023730.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chauhan, R. S. Text of Veterinary Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis 110–111 (Joypee Brothers Medial Publishers, 1995).
  • 2.Stocco, A. V., Santos Sousa, C. A., Gomes, M. S. & Souza Júnior, P. Abidu Figueiredo, M. is there a difference between the right and left kidney? A macroscopic approach in Brazilian Shorthair Cat. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec 68, 1137–1144. 10.1590/1678-4162-8339 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sampaio, F. J., Pereira-sampaio, M. A. & Favorito, L. A. The pig kidney as an endourologic model: anatomic contribution. J. Endourol. 12, 45–50. 10.1089/end.1998.12.45 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmiedt, C. W. et al. Bilateral renal ischemia as a model of acute kidney injury in cats. Res. Vet. Sci. 93, 950–959. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.12.004 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dursun, N. Veteriner anatomi II 128–134 (Medisan Yaymevi, 1994).
  • 6.Christensen, G. C. Circulation of blood through the canine kidney. Am. J. Vet. Res. 13, 236–245 (1952). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Evans, H. E. & Christensen, G. C. Urogenital system. In Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog (ed Evans, H. E.) 494–500 (W.B Saunders Company, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yoldas, A. & Dayan, M. O. Morphological characteristics of renal artery and kidney in rats. Sci. World J. 7, 468982. 10.1155/2014/468982 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.El Karmoty, A., Daghash, S. & Abdelnaby, E. S. Some anatomical studies on the kidney of goat (Capra hircus) with special reference to angioarchitecture, ultrasonography and Doppler. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 46, 565–574. 10.55730/1300-0128.4227 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aslan, K. Macroanatomic investigations on the intrarenal segmentation of the renal artery in the mongrel dog. Eurasian J. Vet. Sci. Univ. Selcuk 11, 149–154 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mannion, P. Diagnostic Ultrasound in Small Animal Practice 109–127 (Blackwell Science, 2006).
  • 12.Sajjarengpong, K. & Adirektaworn, A. The variations and patterns of renal arteries in dogs. Thai J. Vet. Med. 36, 39–46. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjvm/article/view/36332 (2015).
  • 13.Abdelnaby, E. A. Hemodynamic changes evaluated by Doppler ultrasonographic technology in the ovaries and uterus of dairy cattle after the puerperium. Reprod. Biol. 20, 202–209. 10.1016/j.repbio.2020.03.001 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Granata, A. et al. Doppler ultrasound and renal artery stenosis: an overview. J. Ultrasound 12, 133–143. 10.1016/j.jus.2009.09.006 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rivers, B. J., Walter, P. A., O’Brien, T. D. & Polzin, D. J. Duplex doppler estimation of Pourcelot resistive index in arcuate arteries of sedated normal cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 10, 28–33. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02020.x (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rivers, B. J. et al. Duplex doppler estimation of resistive index in arcuate arteries of sedated, normal female dogs: implications for use in the diagnosis of renal failure. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33, 69–76. 10.5326/15473317-33-1-69 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tublin, M. E., Bude, R. O. & Platt, J. F. The resistance index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 180, 885–892. 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800885 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Evangelista, G. C. L. et al. Evaluating feline lower urinary tract disease: Doppler ultrasound of the kidneys. J. Feline Med. Surg. 25, 1–9. 10.1177/1098612X221145477 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Debruyn, K. et al. Renal dimensions at ultrasonography in healthy Ragdoll cats with normal kidney morphology: correlation with age, gender and bodyweight. J. Feline. Med. Surg. 15(12), 1046–1051 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cáceres, A. V., Zwingenberger, A. L., Aronson, L. R. & Mai, W. Characterization of normal feline renal vascular anatomy with dual-phase ct angiography. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 49, 350–356. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00378.x (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Darawiroj, D. & Choisunirachon, N. Morphological assessment of cat kidneys using computed tomography. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 48, 358–365. 10.1111/ahe.12448 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Onyeanusi, B. I., Adeniyi, A. A., Onyeanusi, C. G., Ayo, J. O. & Ibe, C. S. A study of the kidney of the Wistar Rat in Northern Guinea Savannah zone: the morphometric aspect. Pak J. Nutr. 8, 1040–1042. 10.3923/pjn.2009.1040.1042 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bolat, D., Bahar, S., Selçuk, M. L. & Tipidarmaz, S. Morphometric investigations of fresh and fixed rabbit kidney. Eurasian J. Vet. Sci. 27, 149–154 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barone, R. Angiology. Comparative Anatomy of Domestic Mammals 14–20 (Vigot, 1996).
  • 25.Ahasan, A. S. M. L. et al. Major variation in branches of the abdominal aorta in New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Int. J. Nat. Sci. 2, 91–98. 10.3329/ijns.v2i4.13218 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aksoy, G. & Ozudogru, Z. A macroscopical investigation on the intrarenal segmentation of the renal arteries in the Van Cat. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fakultesi Dergisi 9, 9–13 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aksoy, G., Kurtul, I., Ozcan, S., Aslan, K. & Ozudogru, Z. Intrarenal arteries and their patterns in the Tuj sheep. Vet. Med. 49, 57–60. 10.17221/5676-VETMED (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saldarriaga, B., Pinto, T. S. A. & Ballesteros, L. E. Morphological expression of the renal artery. A direct anatomical study in a Colombian half-caste population. Int. J. Morphol. 26, 31–38. 10.4067/S0717-95022008000100005 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sindel, M., Ucar, Y. & Ozkan, O. Renal arterial system of the domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus): corrosion cast study. J. Anat. Soc. India 39, 31–40 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aslan, K. & Nazli, M. A comparative macro-anatomic investigation on the intrarenal segmentation of the renal artery in goats and morkaraman sheep. Indian Vet. J. 78, 139–143 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pereira-Sampaio, M. A., Favorito, L. A. & Sampaio, F. J. B. Pig kidney: anatomical relationships between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. Applied study for urological research and surgical training. J. Urol. 172, 2077–2081. 10.1097/01.ju.0000138085.19352.b5 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ozudogru, Z. & Ozdemir, D. Intrarenal arterial patterns in the wolf (Canis Lupis). Vet. Med. 50, 411–414. 10.17221/5641-VETMED (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Satyapal, K. S. et al. Additional renal arteries: incidence and morphometry. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 23, 33–38. 10.1007/s00276-001-0033-y (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marques-Sampaio, B. P. S., Pereira-Sampaio, M. A., Henry, R. W., Favorito, L. A. & Sampaio, F. J. B. Dog kidney: anatomical relationships between intrarenal arteries and kidney collecting system. Anat. Rec. 290, 1017–1022. 10.1002/ar.20567 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Park, I. C. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal dimension and resistive index in clinically healthy Korean domestic short-hair cats. J. Vet. Sci. 9, 415–419. 10.4142/jvs.2008.9.4.415 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sampaio, F. J. B. & Aragao, A. H. M. Anatomical relationship between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. J. Urol. 143, 679–681. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40056-5 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Larson, M. M. The kidneys and ureters. In BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Abdominal Imaging, ed. 1 (eds. O’Brien, R. & Barr, F.) 185–204 (British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2009).
  • 38.Azizi, F., Nasrollahzadeh Masouleh, M., Mashhadi Rafie, S., Asghari, A. & Bokaie, S. Effects of medetomidine on intra-renal arteries resistive and pulsatility indices in clinically normal adult domestic shorthair cats. Vet. Res. Forum: Int. Q. J. 2, 137–143. 10.30466/VRF.2018.30832 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yan, G. Y., Chen, K. Y., Wang, H. C., Ma, T. Y. & Chen, K. S. Relationship between ultrasonographically determined renal dimensions and International Renal Interest Society stages in cats with chronic kidney disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 34, 1464–1475. 10.1111/jvim.15814 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Evangelista, G. C. L., Viana, A. G. D. A., Neves, M. M. & Reis, E. C. C. Resistivity and pulsatility indexes in feline kidney disease: a systematic review. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 63, 306–318. 10.1111/vru.13102 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moarabi, A., Hanafi, M. G., Mosalla Nejad, B. & Alimardani, P. Measurement of normal renal artery indices in domestic shorthair cats by Doppler ultrasonography. Iran. Veterinary J. 17, 103–110. 10.22055/ivj.2020.169338.2111 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Novellas, R., de Gopegui, R., Espada, Y. & R. & Assessment of renal vascular resistance and blood pressure in dogs and cats with renal disease. Vet. Rec. 166, 618–623. 10.1136/vr.b4820 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nyland, T. G., Mattoon, J. S., Herrgesell, E. J. & Wisner, E. R. Urinary tract. In Veterinary Diagnostic Ultrasound (eds. Nyland, T. G. & Mattoon, J. S.) 158–195 (WB Saunders, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Webster, N. Ultrasonography of the urogenital tract in dogs and cats. Pract. 31, 210–217. 10.1136/inpract.31.5.210 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tipisca, V. et al. Resistive index for kidney evaluation in normal and diseased cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 18, 471–475. 10.1177/1098612X15587 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES