Abstract
Background:
Brugada syndrome is generally considered a cardiac channelopathy disorder characterized by syncope or sudden cardiac death. The sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) gene is the most commonly mutated gene associated with Brugada syndrome. Recent discoveries of new variants of this gene, along with current guidance of family screening, have identified several asymptomatic carriers with potentially causative mutations.
Case presentation:
We present the case of a 25-year-old female patient without any family history of Brugada syndrome nor related congenital cardiovascular disorders, with an extensive atrioventricular canal defect, who tested positive for a novel heterozygous variant NM_198056.3: c.3169G>C (p. Asp1057 His) in the SCN5A gene. She had no history of syncope or aborted sudden cardiac death except for recurrent chest infections since her early childhood. Intriguingly, she did not show a type I Brugada electrocardiogram pattern.
Conclusions:
This report provides a novel heterozygous variant NM_198056.3: c.3169G>C (p. Asp1057 His) in the SCN5A gene, which may have a potential detrimental effect.
Keywords: Brugada syndrome, atrioventricular canal, atrial fibrillation, novel variant, whole genome sequencing, Sanger sequencing
BACKGROUND
Brugada syndrome is a heritable cardiac channelopathy characterized by a distinctive electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias.1,2
First described in 1992, Brugada syndrome is associated with mutations in the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A),3–7 which encodes the alpha subunit of the primary cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 This channel has four domains (DI-DIV), each with six segments (S1-S6).8 The syndrome exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance and a prevalence that varies geographically, being more common in Southeast Asian populations.3–7 Despite extensive research, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying Brugada syndrome remain complex, involving a combination of genetic, molecular, and electrophysiological factors.1–7
We report the case of a young female patient without any family history of Brugada syndrome or any related congenital cardiovascular disorders who tested positive for a novel heterozygous variant NM_198056.3: c.3169G>C (p. Asp1057 His) in the SCN5A gene.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 25-year-old nondiabetic normotensive female was admitted to the emergency department with fever, chest discomfort, and shortness of breath for the last 15 days, which was exaggerated for the previous few hours. On examination, her heart rate was 112/min, blood pressure 90/60 mmHg, respiratory rate 34/min, SpO2 84% in room air, capillary blood glucose 138 mg/dl, and temperature 39.5°C. A general survey revealed grade three nail clubbing with moderate cyanosis and abdominal tenderness. Cardiopulmonary examination revealed variable splitting of first heart sound (S1); bilateral vesicular breath sound was found to be decreased with prominent basal crepitations predominantly over the right hemithorax. The chest X-ray revealed pulmonary congestion with white infiltrates, predominantly over the right middle lobar area. She was immediately initiated on oxygen support with a face mask, intravenous fluid, and broad-spectrum antibiotics. 12 lead electrocardiogram revealed low amplitude of P wave on the rhythm strip along and right ventricular hypertrophy (Figure-1a). Laboratory tests showed a white blood cell count of 12.3 109/μL with 81% neutrophils, serum C reactive protein of 38 mg/dl (normal range, 0.3 – 1 mg/dl), serum procalcitonin level of 0.7 ng/ml (normal range, less than 0.05 ng/ml), and normal high sensitivity cardiac troponin levels. 2D echocardiography with Doppler was conducted, which revealed an atrioventricular canal defect, single atrium with single atrioventricular valve, large 37 mm ventricular septal defect, mild regurgitation through an atrioventricular valve, right ventricular hypertrophy with partial outflow tract obstruction defect and hypoplastic left ventricular cavity (Figure-1b and 1c). Detailed history-taking revealed recurrent episodes of chest infection since her early childhood, for which she was treated accordingly. Besides, an evidential history of preterm delivery with significant developmental retardation became clear. There was no significant history of smoking or any substance abuse.

Figure 1a reveals a low amplitude of P waves on the rhythm strip and right ventricular hypertrophy. Figure-1b and Figure-1c reveal a single atrium with a significant ventricular septal defect (in dotted line and color Doppler-flow), right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy with partial outflow tract obstruction defect, and hypoplastic left ventricular (LV) cavity (four apical chamber view on 2D-echocardiography).
Meanwhile, her condition improved after three days of closed intensive observation. Based on the findings of the significant cardiac anomaly on echo and disproportionate metacarpophalangeal ratio with grade-3 nail clubbing, we considered among the initial diagnoses both the Holt-Oram syndrome, also referred to as the heart-hand syndrome and the nonsyndromic atrioventricular canal defect. However, the hands’ digital X-rays showed no brachy-mesophalangia, triphalangeal thumb, or radial deficiency. Henceforth, whole exome genetic sequencing was planned.
Genetic Assessment:
Whole exome analysis revealed the presence of a novel transversion type single nucleotide variation in the SCN5A gene at exon 17 (c.3169G>C), resulting in a missense type mutation from aspartic amino acid to histidine amino acid at 1057 position of the primary protein structure. Sanger sequencing data confirmed revealed a nucleotide change at chromosome 3 (c.3169G>C). We have also performed multiple sequence alignments to determine whether aspartic acid is conserved across the species, and the result of alignment revealed that this particular amino acid is highly conserved (Table 1) (Figures 2a and 2b). The detailed sequencing procedure is mentioned in Supplementary 1.
Table 1:
Multiple sequence alignment showing conserved aspartic amino acid residue across different species.
| SI No | Genbank Id | Species | Start Position | Amino acid Sequence | End Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case | Homo sapiens sapiens | 1050 | AVAESDTHDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 2 | KAI2528893 | Homo sapiens sapiens | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 3 | PNI74006 | Pan troglodytes | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 4 | ACX32327 | Synthetic construct | - | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | - |
| 5 | XP_057157671 | Pan paniscus | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 6 | XP_055237269 | Gorilla gorilla gorilla | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 7 | XP_030667968 | Nomascus leucogenys | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 8 | XP_058298838 | Hylobates moloch | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 9 | XP_011854877 | Mandrillus leucophaeus | 1049 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 1075 |
| 10 | XP_025231014 | Theropithecus gelada | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 11 | XP_003894712 | Papio anubis | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 12 | XP_037844370 | Chlorocebus sabaeus | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 13 | XP_055138561 | Symphalangus syndactylus | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLGTEEESSKQ | 1076 |
| 14 | XP_030790807 | Rhinopithecus roxellana | 822 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDMEEESSKQ | 848 |
| 15 | EHH16500 | Macaca mulatta | 916 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 942 |
| 16 | XP_028699800 | Macaca mulatta | 889 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 915 |
| 17 | XP_011889640 | Cercocebus atys | 1050 | AVAESDTDDQEEDEENSLDTEEESSKQ | 1076 |

Figure 2a: Sanger Sequencing for the confirmation of variant in the provided sample detected in the SCN5A gene in the index patient. The analysis was performed only for the variant at c.3169G>C (p.Asp1057His) in the SCN5A gene.
Figure-2b: Sanger sequencing data (electropherogram) for the provided sample showing nucleotide change at chromosome-3: c.3169G>C, (p.Asp1057His) in SCN5A gene.
Figure 2c: CFSSP prediction of the local secondary structure of the sodium ion transport associated domain (InterPro ID – IPR10526, Pfam ID – PF06512) comprising 953rd to 1200th amino acid. The D1057H change in the protein corresponding to D105H in this domain (underlined with blue in the figure) shifts the second turn to the following amino acid, causing local structural instability.
In-silico Predictions:
The secondary structure tolerance prediction analyzer tool, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT),9 was used to predict the functional tolerance of the variation in comparison to the wild type. Predictive changes in the secondary structure of proteins due to nucleotide variations were analyzed using the Chou and Fasman Secondary Structure Prediction Server (CFSSP)10 and Disorder Including Mutation Prediction (DIM_PRED).11 The analysis found that substituting aspartate at the 1057 amino acid position of the SCN5A protein can only be tolerated functionally when replaced with amino acids like phenylalanine, glutamine, and glutamic acid. With a SIFT tolerance score of a moderately higher value of 0.68, the rest of the amino acids, including histidine, are predicted to be non-tolerable at the 1057 aa position of SCN5A polypeptide. This SCN5A encoded polypeptide is the alpha subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel 5 expressed in cardiac cells. The protein has seven functional domains, including four ion transport domains, one cytoplasmic domain of sodium ion channel, one inactivation gate, and one sodium ion transport associated domain (InterPro ID – IPR10526, Pfam ID – PF06512) comprising 953rd to 1200th amino acid where the change was found in the 1057th position of the protein. This 248 amino acids long domain harbours the change of D to H (Asp to His) at its 105th position. CFSSP server analysis of this domain revealed that the wild-type protein has a secondary turn position comprising 106th amino acid D (1058aa of the protein).
In contrast, D1057H variation altered the turn position to comprise 107th amino acid Q (1059 aa of the protein). The DIM_Pred tool (Prediction of protein disorder on amino acid substitutions) of IIT, Madras, India, was used to identify any functional change of the D1057H substitution. DIM_Pred predicted an order to disorder change due to this substitution. Therefore, the presently reported novel variation with a non-tolerable substitution at the 1057th position is expected to be functionally damaging. (Figure 2c)
DISCUSSION
The case presented here highlights a 25-year-old female with a novel SCN5A variant (c.3169G>C, p. Asp1057His) who presented with an atrioventricular canal defect without the classical Brugada syndrome phenotype. This case adds to the growing body of literature on the genetic variability and phenotypic heterogeneity of Brugada syndrome.
Over 300 SCN5A variants have been found, including missense, nonsense, insertion/deletion, and splice site variations associated with Brugada syndrome.3,7,12 In this present study, we report for the first time the NM_198056.3: c.3169G>C (p. Asp1057 His) heterozygous variant in the SCN5A gene and its segregation with Brugada syndrome. The findings support a likely harmful effect of this variant and contribute an essential milestone to advancing our diagnostic capabilities in patients with similar variants. In silico analysis predicted that the identified SCN5A variant is likely deleterious, potentially affecting the protein’s function. This aligns with previous findings that many SCN5A mutations result in a loss of function of the sodium channel, contributing to the arrhythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome.4 However, the clinical significance of this variant requires further validation through functional studies and family screening.
The absence of a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in our patient, despite the presence of an SCN5A mutation, underscores the incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of the syndrome. Although an electrophysiological study was planned, the patient denied it. Besides, we decided not to perform any drug provocation test with a sodium channel blocking agent provided that the patient’s condition was acute and that a possible positive test would not alter the treatment in the absence of any arrhythmic syncope or aborted sudden cardiac death. The current definition of only type-I morphology is diagnostic of Brugada syndrome, while the other types, including type-II and type-III electrocardiogram patterns, do not support its diagnosis.12 We took a more conservative approach as the patient did not consent to an electrophysiological study with regular follow-ups and lifestyle recommendations. Considering the patient’s poor financial status and normal phenotypical characteristics on detailed clinical examination, including 12-lead electrocardiogram and 2D-echocardiography among first-degree relatives of the patient, we also decided not to go for whole-exome sequencing of the first-degree family members.
The coexistence of significant structural heart anomalies, such as the atrioventricular canal defect in our patient, raises intriguing questions about the interplay between genetic mutations and cardiac development. While structural heart defects are not typically associated with Brugada syndrome,1,2 this case suggests that certain SCN5A mutations might have broader implications for cardiac morphology and function. Atrioventricular canal defects can be classified into complete and partial, based on the extent of anatomical abnormalities, representing approximately 7% of all congenital heart diseases.13 Most of such cases are usually associated with underlying genetic abnormalities like trisomy-21/heterotaxy, yet 40% of such cases exist without these usual genetic associations; of these, 30% of patients have identifiable chromosomal or gene disorders, 10% have extracardiac anomalies, and the remaining do not have extracardiac abnormalities (nonsyndromic atrioventricular canal defect).14 According to a recent study,15 five out of 36 patients with Brugada syndrome revealed ventricular septal defects for which they were taken forward for genetic research, showing SCN5A with missense, non-functional variant, and loss-of-function variants.
In summary, this case interestingly reveals an uncanny combination of Brugada syndrome-related genetic variance with extensive atrioventricular canal malformation. Intriguingly, such extensive cardiac malformation in our patient could not be apprehended, and whether this was related to this novel SCN5A variant. Thus, it highlights that clinical decision algorithms may sometimes be more complex and stepwise protocol-based, necessitating more comprehensive individualized investigations and management. Additionally, complete atrioventricular canal defect in association with the novel heterozygous variant NM_198056.3: c.3169G>C (p. Asp1057 His) in the SCN5A gene segregates with Brugada syndrome; this finding may add crucial human data to understand the pathogenesis of Brugada syndrome for patients with this variant. Such novel variants may also be significant for understanding the population not associated with typical genotype or nonsyndromic atrioventricular canal defect.
Finally, this case emphasizes the need for comprehensive genetic screening and personalized management strategies in patients with suspected Brugada syndrome, particularly those with atypical presentations. Future research should focus on elucidating the functional impacts of novel SCN5A variants and exploring their potential roles in congenital heart defects.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
We sincerely thank LifeCell International for assisting in whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing of the patient’s sample. J. Benito-León is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA (NINDS #R01 NS39422), the European Commission (grant ICT-2011- 287739, NeuroTREMOR), the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant RTC-2015-3967-1, NetMD—platform for the tracking of movement disorder), the Spanish Health Research Agency (grant FIS PI12/01602 and grant FIS PI16/00451) and The Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan at the Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant TED2021-130174B-C33, NETremor).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement:
None
Ethics statement:
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients to publish this article and any accompanying images.
References:
- 1.Mizusawa Y, Wilde AA. Brugada syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(3):606–616. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eckardt L, Veltmann C. More than 30 years of Brugada syndrome: a critical appraisal of achievements and open issues. 30 Jahre Brugada-Syndrom – eine kritische Bewertung und Diskussion offener Fragen. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024;35(1):9–18. doi: 10.1007/s00399-023-00983-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.George AL Jr, Varkony TA, Drabkin HA, et al. Assignment of the human heart tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha-subunit gene (SCN5A) to band 3p21. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995;68(1–2):67–70. doi: 10.1159/000133892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Alders M, et al. An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(1):33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li W, Yin L, Shen C, Hu K, Ge J, Sun A. SCN5A variants: association with cardiac disorders. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1372. Published 2018 Oct 9. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cerrone M, Costa S, Delmar M. The genetics of Brugada syndrome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2022;23:255–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-112921-011200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moras E, Gandhi K, Narasimhan B, et al. Genetic and molecular mechanisms in Brugada syndrome. Cells. 2023;12(13):1791. Published 2023 Jul 5. doi: 10.3390/cells12131791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aronsen JM, Swift F, Sejersted OM. Cardiac sodium transport and excitation-contraction coupling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;61:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/
- 10.[CFSSP Server – biox.ml/cf].
- 11.Anoosha P, Sakthivel R, Gromiha MM. Prediction of protein disorder on amino acid substitutions. Anal Biochem. 2015;491:18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(21):1648–1654. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gillette PC. Genetic and environmental factors of major cardiovascular malformations: The Baltimore-Washington infant study: 1981–1989. Ferencz C, Correa-Villasenor A, Loffredo CA, Wilson PD, eds. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company Inc; 1998. 463 pages. Clin Cardiol. 2009;21 (11):867–868. Published 2009 Feb 3. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960211122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Digilio MC, Marino B, Toscano A, Giannotti A, Dallapiccola B. Atrioventricular canal defect without Down syndrome: a heterogeneous malformation. Am J Med Genet. 1999;85(2):140–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Suzuki K, Sonoda K, Aoki H, et al. Association between deleterious SCN5A variants and ventricular septal defect in young patients with Brugada syndrome. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(3):297–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
