Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Oct 28;18(10):e0012583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012583

Multi-omics analyses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens treated mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum reveal dynamics change of intestinal microbiome and its associations with host metabolism

Hao Chen 1,2, Shuaiqin Huang 1, Siqi Yao 2, Jingyan Wang 2, Jing Huang 1,*, Zheng Yu 2,*
Editor: Fernando Lopes3
PMCID: PMC11515987  PMID: 39466852

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis japonica is a serious threat to human health. It causes damage to the intestine and liver. Probiotic therapy has been shown to be effective in alleviating intestinal diseases and improving host health. Previous studies have found that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens could alleviate the pathological symptoms of schistosomiasis japonica, but the regulatory mechanism of alleviating schistosomiasis japonica is still unknown.

Principal findings

This study analyzed the dynamic changes of intestinal microbiome in mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum after the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens and its connection to host metabolism by multi-omics sequencing technology. B. amyloliquefaciens was found to significantly regulate the homeostasis of intestinal microbiota by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting potential pathogenic bacteria and protect the number of core microbes. Meanwhile, the genes related to the metabolism of glycerophospholipids and amino acid from intestinal microbiome changed significantly, and were shown to be significantly positively correlated with the associated metabolites of microbial origin. Moreover, host metabolism (lipid metabolism and steroid hormone biosynthesis) was also found to be significantly regulated.

Conclusions

The recovery of intestinal microbial homeostasis and the regulation of host metabolism revealed the potential probiotic properties of B. amyloliquefaciens, which also provided new ideas for the prevention and adjuvant treatment of schistosomiasis japonica.

Author summary

Schistosomiasis, which seriously threatens human health, is the world’s second largest tropical disease caused by schistosome infection. Praziquantel has many problems such as side effects and drug resistance, so it is urgent to develop new prevention strategies. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens has been reported to alleviate the pathological damage of intestinal diseases, which can be used as a potential strategy to alleviate granuloma and fibrosis induced by schistosomiasis japonica in intestine and liver. However, the mechanism of B. amyloliquefaciens regulating schistosomiasis japonica through the mediation of intestinal microbiome is still unclear. In this study, we conducted joint analysis of the gut microbiome and host serum metabolites through mouse models and multi-omics sequencing technology, and found that the intragastric administration of B. amyloliquefaciens could regulate the restoration of intestinal microbiome and the secretion of metabolites derived from intestinal microbiome in mice, improve lipid metabolism disorder and hormone secretion in mice, and ultimately reduce the pathological response of mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum. This study highlights the crosstalk between intestinal microbiome and the host, providing an important reference for the precise treatment based on targeted microbiota, and also providing a new strategy for the prevention and adjuvant treatment of schistosomiasis japonica.

Background

Schistosomiasis endangers human health worldwide, and causes approximately 280,000 deaths annually [1]. Schistosoma japonicum is a parasitic worm that causes schistosomiasis, mainly prevalent in Southeast Asia, including China [2]. Cercariae, the larvae of S. japonicum, can quickly penetrate the human skin in water and migrate through the vascular system until they reach the most suitable blood vessels to grow and mate [3]. The deposited eggs lead to granulomatous reactions and subsequent chronic inflammation and fibrosis in liver and gut, which is considered as the main reason for human pathological symptoms [4,5]. Clinically, the specific symptoms are mainly concentrated in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen, like hepatosplenomegaly, colitis, and hematochezia [6,7]. Pathological symptoms are the host’s response to the autoimmune response [8]. With the progression of schistosomiasis japonica, immune response of Th1 type was gradually inhibited accompanied by the enhancement of Th2 type response [9]. IFN-γ, IL-12, TNF-α, and IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, TGF-β increased successively during the process [10,11]. The changes in the host immune system due to S. japonicum infection provide balanced-coexistence between the host and S. japonicum, hence protecting the host from inflammatory damage or even death caused by infection [12]. Therefore, elucidation of the immune mechanism and molecular regulatory basis of S. japonicum infection will help to develop effective vaccines and immunotherapeutic measures to prevent and control schistosomiasis.

Gut microbiota is a diverse community of microorganisms that reside in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and other animals, which plays an important role in the normal physiological activities. Through mediating the host immune-microbiota crosstalk, dynamic changes and metabolic activity of microbiota can not only enhance the intestinal barrier function, but also regulate the host immune response and maintain the healthy homeostasis of the host [13,14]. The occurrence and development of various diseases were also closely related to the dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota [15,16]. The transformation of schistosomiasis japonica from acute to chronic phase is inseparable from the disturbance of the microbiota. Granulomas induced by S. japonicum infection caused the destruction of intestinal mucosa, resulting in dysbiosis of gut microbiota in terms of composition and the change of metabolic function, which further aggravates the deterioration caused by the disease [1719]. Based on the close relationship between gut microbiota and host health, targeted regulation of intestinal microbiota through external environment, diet, probiotic supplementation and other strategies could be used as adjuvant therapies for disease prevention and control [20]. Therefore, based on the fact that the efficacy of praziquantel is gradually declining, reshaping the host-microbiome interaction can be used as one of promising potential ways to control schistosomiasis japonica [21]. Bacillus subtilis is the first microbe applied to mouse model of schistosomiasis japonica. After intragastric administration of B. subtilis, symptoms of S. japonicum-infected mice were alleviated which was characterized by reduction of intestinal granulomas, reshaping of intestinal microbiota and changes in the genes related to differentiation of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells [22]. Evidenced by researches, treatment of schistosomiasis japonica with microbes could be practical and an effective measure. However, specific mechanisms of microbiome-host interaction and regulation of immune response in the host are not explored and elucidated.

B. amyloliquefaciens is considered to be an ideal probiotic. It is widespread in different harsh environments, and the formation of endospores enables it to withstand extreme conditions (acid resistance, high temperature resistance) [23]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Agency have recognized the non-toxic nature of B. amyloliquefaciens, and it is also widely used in food processing and drug research [24,25]. In addition, some animal models have proved that B. amyloliquefaciens could significantly regulate gut microbiota and improve the physiological conditions of the host (colitis relieving, blood glucose reducing, obesity improving) [2631]. Therefore, B. amyloliquefaciens is a safe microbe with high robustness, which has the potential to alleviate schistosomiasis japonica by targeting and reshaping the intestinal microbiota. In this study, intragastrical administration via oral gavage of B. amyloliquefaciens was performed on mice infected with S. japonicum. Through the analysis of intestinal microbiome and serum metabolites of host, we want to evaluate the effectiveness of B. amyloliquefaciens intervention, and elaborate the mechanism of schistosomiasis japonica relief from the perspective of microbiome-host interaction.

Methods

Ethics statement

Experiments about the isolation and identification of B. amyloliquefaciens were reviewed and approved by The IRB of School of Basic Medical Science of Central South University (No: 2021-KT75). All experiments on mice in this study were conducted in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The animal experiments were reviewed and approved by The IRB of School of Basic Medical Science of Central South University (No: 2021-KT25).

Design and conducting of animal experiments

Specific details about isolation of B. amyloliquefaciens strain 802 and preparation of suspensions followed the methods reported by previous research. Briefly, the bacterial strains were cultured in lysogeny broth medium and grew at 37°C in the constant-temperature shaker with 200 rpm [26]. Detailed strain information of B. amyloliquefaciens strain 802 could be referred to National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with accession of MT585518.1, and reference genome could be found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_019396925.1/. Cercariae came from the Chinese mainland strain of S. japonicum which was maintained by serial passage through O. hupensis snails and the inbred Chinese Kun-ming mice. And snails were maintained in a simulated natural microenvironment at 23–25°C, 12:12 h light:dark cycle and fed lettuce as needed for their breeding [32]. 28 five-week-old female pathogen-free BALB/c mice were purchased from Hunan Sleek Jingda, Changsha, China. All mice were settled in plastic cages with metal fence covers. The environmental conditions were sterile, with free access to standard rat food and drinking water under controlled temperature (25 ± 5°C), humidity (60%–70%), and light (12/12-hour light/dark cycle). Based on the design of experiments, all mice were separated randomly into four groups after one-week adaptive feeding: PBS (mice treated with phosphate buffered saline), BA (mice treated with B. amyloliquefaciens), SJ (S. japonicum-infected mice treated with PBS), SJBA (S. japonicum-infected mice treated with B. amyloliquefaciens). Mice from SJ and SJBA groups were used to construct S. japonicum-infected models. Cover slips containing 27 ± 3 S. japonicum cercariae were covered on the shaved abdominal skin of mice for 30 minutes to ensure complete penetration of the cercariae into the skin.

Collection of stool and serum samples

Stool collection lasted from one day before the infection to the day of sacrifice of mice and conducted following by experimental design (Fig 1A). Specifically, the anus of mice was stimulated with cotton swabs to promote defecation, and then collected fresh stool in sterile tubes. Mice from groups of SJ and SJBA were performed to collect serum samples on day 45. After anesthesia with isoflurane, blood samples were drawn from orbital veins and sacrificed mice subsequently by cervical dislocation. Serum samples were obtained from blood samples by centrifuging at 4000× g for 10 min (Glanlab, Changsha, China). Stool and serum samples was stored at -80°C for further analysis.

Fig 1. Treatment of B. amyloliquefaciens led to the dynamic changes of intestinal microbiota in mice infected with S. japonicum.

Fig 1

(A) Experimental design schedule for the study. Adaptive feeding from day -7 to day 0. (B) Analysis of NMDS among three DMM clusters based on the Bray-Curtis distance. (C) DMM clusters of the microbial communities in different four groups within 45 days. Different colors represent different DMM clusters. (D) Changes of numbers of genus among the three occurrence patterns (“Core”, “Disappearance” and “Colonization”) in the four groups within 45 days. Points characterize the frequency of occurrence in each four group with 45 days. Dark blue points represent the presence of genus (n = 3). Light blue points denote the state of the genus between presence and absence. Grey points signify the absence of genus (n = 0). Upset plot highlights the bacterial genera intersection of patterns of “Core” (E) and “Disappearance” (F). Heatmap represents the changes in abundance of genus in the SJ and SJBA groups. Fitting curve indicates the changes of relative abundance about genera in the disappearance pattern in SJ group.

16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing of intestinal microbiota

Three stool samples from each of the four groups at five sampling time points (day 0, day 12, day 24, day 36, day 45 after infection of S. japonicum) were selected randomly for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (please refer to Fig 1A drawn by Adobe Illustrator). Total genomic DNA of stool samples was extracted by following the protocol of OMEGA Soil DNA Kit (M5636-02) (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA), and then the measurement of quantity and quality were performed respectively by NanoDrop NC2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted to amplify the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene by using the forward primers 338F (5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3’) and reverse primers 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’). Sample-specific 7 bp barcodes were incorporated into the primers for multiplex sequencing. The PCR components contained 5 μL of Q5 reaction buffer (5×), 5 μL of Q5 High-Fidelity GC buffer (5×), 0.25 μL of Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (5U/μL), 2 μL (2.5 mM) of dNTPs, 1 μL (10 μM) of each Forward and Reverse primer, 2 μL of DNA Template, and 8.75 μL of ddH2O. Thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 98°C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles consisting of denaturation at 98°C for 15 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. PCR amplicons were purified with Agencourt AMPure Beads (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) and quantified using the PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After the individual quantification step, amplicons were pooled in equal amounts, and paired-end 2×300 bp sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq platform with the NovaSeq-PE250 sequencing strategy at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

The raw reads after sequencing were decomposed into appropriate samples based on the barcodes and then imported into the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2) [33]. Plugin DADA2 denoise-paired was used to dereplicate the raw data and create a feature table and feature representative sequences [34]. Plugin feature-classifier and classify-consensus-blast were used to perform taxonomic classification based on Silva 138 reference sequence (MD5: a914837bc3f8964b156a9653e2420d22) and taxonomy files (MD5: e2c40ae4c60cbf75e24312bb24652f2c) [35]. Plugin taxa were used to remove non-bacterial sequences and mitochondrial chloroplast contamination. Feature table and taxonomic annotation table generated in the process were used for further data analysis.

Metagenome sequencing of intestinal microbiome

Three stool samples from each of the four groups on day 45 were selected randomly for metagenome shotgun sequencing. Total genomic DNA of stool samples were extracted following the instructions of the OMEGA Soil DNA Kit (D5625-01) (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA), and then the measurement of quantity and quality were performed respectively by NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Preparation Kit was used to process DNA to construct libraries with insert sizes of 400 bp. Illumina HiSeq X-ten platform (Illumina, USA) was subsequently used to sequence with PE150 strategy at Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Raw reads were processed to obtain quality-filtered reads for further analysis.

Cutadapt was used for removing sequencing adapters from raw reads [36]. Fastp was used for trimming low quality reads by using a sliding window algorithm [37].Then, in order to filter out the sequence from mice, Bowtie2 was used to align the processed raw reads to the reference genome of mice (mm39) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000001635.27/) and host-free reads could be obtained subsequently by specifying “--un-conc” parameter [38]. Taxonomic classification of high-quality reads was annotated by Kraken2 based on the Mouse Gastrointestinal Bacteria Catalogue (MGBC) database, and relative abundance was normalized by using Bracken based on the MGBC database [3941]. Subsequently, contigs were assembled based on high-quality reads by Megahit, and predicted for coding sequencing (CDSs) by Prodigal [42,43]. CD-HIT was used for removing redundancy from predicted genes [44]. The read coverage for each gene in different samples was estimated and normalized through Salmon by mapping raw reads from each sample to sequences in gene catalog constructed by script “Salmon index” [45]. Finally, functional annotation of genes was conducted by eggNOG-mapper [46]. Tables of taxonomic classification and genes were used for further analysis.

Metabolomic profiling of serum metabolites

Six serum samples from each of SJ and SJBA groups on day 45 were selected randomly to perform untargeted metabolomic sequencing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to separate metabolites through ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (LC-30A, Shimadzu, Japan) and mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 6600+, SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). The original data file produced by LC-MS/MS was converted into mzML format by ProteoWizard software [47]. Peak extraction, peak alignment and retention time correction were respectively performed by XCMS program [48]. The peaks with detection rate lower than 50% in each group of samples were discarded. After that, metabolic identification information was obtained by searching the laboratory’s self-built database, human metabolome database (HMDB) (https://hmdb.ca/), and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) (https://www.kegg.jp/) database. Then, metabolites annotated to databases were used for further analysis.

Analysis of dynamics changes of intestinal microbiota

Unless otherwise specified, all statistical analysis was performed in the R studio and merging of figures was performed in the Adobe Illustrator (2022) [49]. Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) models were used to assign the samples to the community types [50]. DMM models were performed by R package “DirichletMultinomial” [51]. The appropriate number of clusters was determined based on the lowest Laplace approximation score. Shannon index and beta diversity based on Bray-Curtis distance were calculated by R package “vegan” [52].

According to the occurrence frequency of genus at five time points in each of the four groups, three categories could be divided, “absent”, “mixture”, “present”. “Present” represented that genus occurred in all three samples in each of the four groups at five time points. “Mixture” represented that genus occurred in one or two samples, and “absent” means that genus didn’t occur in any samples. And based on the regular changes of three categories at five time points, occurrence patterns were defined into three types: “Colonization”: from “absent” to “present”; “Disappearance”: from “present” to “absent”; “Core”: always “present” [53]. And heatmap was used to present the number of genus-level bacteria in three occurrence patterns which was performed by R package “pheatmap” [54]. Intersection plots represented intersection of all bacterial genera belong to “Core” or “Disappearance” occurrence patterns within four groups which were performed by R package “UpSetR” [55]. The fitting curve presented changes of the relative abundance of bacterial genera over time which was analyzed by R package “ggplot2” [56].

Analysis of intestinal microbiome

Abundance flatting following by Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis based on the Bray-Curtis distance presented the difference of taxonomic composition of four groups performed by R package “vegan” [52]. Taxonomic composition of four groups at species levels were performed by R package “ggplot2” [56]. Differential species were discovered by Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) Effect Size (LEfSe) (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/) (Galaxy, 2022). The threshold of P-value and the LDA score was set at 0.05 and 3.0. Venn plot was used to selected representative species performed by R package “ggVennDiagram” [57]. Abundance of representative species was presented by R package “ggplot2” [56]. Display of differential genes and enrichment analysis of genes were performed by R package “ggplot2” [56].

Analysis of serum metabolites

Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) was used for statistical analysis to determine global metabolic changes between two groups, which were performed by R package “ropls” [58]. Variable importance in the projection (VIP) calculated from the OPLS-DA model and P-value calculated from Mann-Whitney U test were used to screen the differential metabolites. Metabolites which VIP was bigger than 1.0 and P-value was lower than 0.05 were selected to be annotated using HMDB and KEGG. Metabolic analysis of differential metabolites was performed on the MetaboAnalyst platform (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) [59]. Analysis of metabolites sources were performed on the MetOrigin platform based on the Deep MetOrgin Analysis (DMOA) [60]. Bar plot was produced to compare the relative significance of differential metabolic pathways from metabolic pathway enrichment analysis (MPEA) according to the differential metabolites from different origins on the MetOrigin platform (https://metorigin.met-bioinformatics.cn/home/). Metabolic pathways were constructed based on the KEGG metabolites maps. These differential metabolites could be classified according to the pathways they were involved in or the functions they performed.

Interactions between microbiome and metabolites

Differential functional genes from amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism were selected by metagenomic analysis. Markers were defined as differential intestinal microbes (33), differential functional genes from lipids metabolism and amino acid metabolism (24), and differential metabolites source from host or microbiota or both (71). Procrustes analysis was performed by the function “Procrustes” in the R package “vegan” to clarify the cooperativity of abundance changes among markers of microbes, functional genes and metabolites, and the sum of squares of deviations (M2) and significance values were obtained by the function “protect” test. Random Forest were used to identity representative markers which was performed by R package “randomForest” [61]. Ten-fold cross validation was performed to evaluate the importance. Representative microbes, genes and metabolites enriched in cluster 1 or cluster 3 together were selected for correlation analysis in respective group. Spearman correlation analysis of microbes to genes, and genes to metabolites was calculated by R package “Hmisc”, and visualized by R package “corrplot” [62,63]. Sankey plot presented the strong correlation from microbes, genes to metabolites which correlation was bigger than 0.8 and adjusted P-value was lower than 0.05, which was performed by R package “ggplot2” [56]. Genes and metabolites located on the same metabolic pathway were selected for analysis. Hypothesis scheme of potential mechanisms drawn by Adobe Illustrator was constructed by gut microbes, genes and serum metabolites from different sources which had strong correlation.

Statistics analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using R studio [49]. Unless otherwise specified, Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to determine significant differences. P-value was corrected by false discovery rate (FDR).

Results

The intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens restored the homeostasis of intestinal microbiota in the mice infected with S. japonicum

According to results of the previous research, the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens significantly alleviated the pathological symptoms of mice infected with S. japonicum [26]. In order to detect the impact of B. amyloliquefaciens intervention on the intestinal microbiota of infected mice, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool was performed to observe the dynamic changes of the microbiota at different time points. Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) models were used to cluster types of bacterial genera communities in four groups, and three types of communities were identified (S1A Fig). Based on the importance of bacterial genera to accuracy of models, Escherichia Shigella had the highest contribution to cluster 3, while Muribaculaceae contributed more to cluster 2. Additionally, the microbial community of cluster 1 was distinct from that of cluster 3 (S1B Fig). These types of clusters showed significant differences in Shannon index and microbial compositions (S1C Fig and Fig 1B). Meanwhile, each cluster had different spatial and temporal distributions (Fig 1C). Cluster 1 and cluster 2 showed high frequency in all of four groups within days from zero to 36. But the community types of SJ group switched to cluster 3 on day 45 while SJBA group still remained cluster 1. These suggested that the community of intestinal microbiota in infected mice altered significantly on day 45 and formed specific community types after intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens.

To investigate the dynamic changes of microbiota, occurrence patterns of each bacterial genera based on their frequency of occurrence within four groups in five time points was then summarized (S2 Fig). And all the occurrence patterns that exhibited regular changes were assigned into three categories: “Colonization,” “Disappearance,” and “Core” (Refer to Methods and Materials for detail information). According to the summarized results of three patterns, bacterial genera belonged to “Core” pattern were decreased dramatically in SJ group (Fig 1D). Results of intersection analysis of bacterial genera belong to “Core” occurrence pattern showed that among the 18 bacterial genera present simultaneously in four groups, Escherichia Shigella, Helicobacter and Lactobacillus increased on day 45 in SJ group while Parabacteroides, Erysipelatoclostridium and Corynebacterium increased on day 45 in SJBA group (Fig 1E). Moreover, 46 bacterial genera were observed to disappear only in SJ group that were presented from day zero to 36 but decreased or even got eliminated on day 45, and significant decrease in relative abundance of these bacterial genera was also only found in SJ group (Figs 1D and 1F). But the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens alleviated this situation well. In short, increase in the abundance of bacterial genera and disappearance of other bacterial genera disrupted the homeostasis of intestinal microbiota in infected mice, while intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens reshaped the composition and promoted the recovery of homeostasis in intestinal microbiota.

The intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens altered the composition and biofunction of intestinal microbiota in infected mice

Based on the analysis results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing in four groups from day zero to day 45, huge change of intestinal microbiota was found on day 45. In order to figure out situation of changes in composition and biofunction of intestinal microbiota, metagenomic sequencing on mice’s stool of day 45 was conducted. Results of NMDS analysis based on Bray-Curtis distance showed that there was distinct difference in taxonomic composition among three clusters (Fig 2A). Henceforth, 33 representative species were selected by overlapping species set (Fig 2B, S3 and S4 Figs). Escherichia coli and Bacteroides stercorirosoris were found to be increased significantly in cluster 3 while Alistipes dispar and Parabacteroides distasonis were found to be increased significantly in cluster 1, which was similar to the analysis results on day 45 of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Fig 2C). Subsequently, differential abundance genes were screened, 246 genes were depleted and 1131 genes were enriched in cluster 1 (Fig 2D). After mapping differential genes to the KEGG metabolic pathways, 20 metabolic pathways were found to be identified after treating with B. amyloliquefaciens, including genetic information processing, carbohydrate metabolism, signaling and cellular processes, amino acid metabolism (Fig 2E).

Fig 2. Treatment of B. amyloliquefaciens significantly altered the composition and function of intestinal microbiota in the mice infected with S. japonicum on day 45.

Fig 2

(A) Analysis of NMDS among three DMM clusters. Boxplots show the difference of NMDS value between different clusters. Difference of different clusters was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. n.s. means no significance, * means P < 0.05. (B) Overlaps among top 100 abundance species, microbiota annotate to species and differentially abundant species screened by LEfSe. (C) The abundance of 33 selected species in three clusters. Different colored points display the abundance enrichment of different species in three clusters. (D) Screening of differential genes between cluster 3 and cluster 1. Red dots show genes significantly enriched in cluster 1 group (Fold change > 2.0 and P < 0.05). Blue dots display genes significantly depleted in cluster 1 group (Fold change < -2.0 and P < 0.05). Grey dots characterize genes didn’t have significant difference (P > 0.05). Gene screening was performed by Mann-Whitney U test, and P-value was corrected by FDR. (E) Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways in differential genes. Different colors of columns represent KEGG pathways of higher classification levels.

Serum metabolites from infected mice had significant changes after intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens

Metagenomic analysis displayed a dramatic change in the gut microbial community and their biofunction after intervention with B. amyloliquefaciens. To investigate the effect of changes on physiological metabolites of infected mice, serum from mice in cluster 1 and cluster 3 was subjected to conduct metabolomics analysis. Analysis of OPLS-DA to both positive and negative ion, showed significant difference in composition of serum metabolites between cluster 1 and cluster 3 (Fig 3A). It indicated that B. amyloliquefaciens intervention had significant impacts on metabolites in mice’s serum, which was consistent with the result of NMDS analysis in the gut metagenome that cluster 1 and cluster 3 was significantly distinct (Fig 2A). Further, 1023 differential metabolites were identified by comparing between cluster 1 and cluster 3, of which 494 could be annotated to HMDB (Fig 3B and S5A Fig). Suggested by the results, metabolites belonging to the category of amino acids (50) accounted for the largest proportion of the 494 differential metabolites, while the number of metabolites belonging to glycerophosphocholines (35), glycerophosphosphoethanolamines (25), aromatic heteropolycyclic compounds (24) and eicosanoids (22) were also top five in terms of proportion (Fig 3B). Furthermore, 226 out of the 494 differential HMDB metabolites were annotated using the KEGG database. And results of KEGG enrichment analysis mapped by 226 metabolites suggested that arachidonic acid metabolism have the most significant difference after intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens (S5B Fig).

Fig 3. Treatment of B. amyloliquefaciens significantly altered serum metabolites in the mice infected with S. japonicum on day 45.

Fig 3

(A) OPLS-DA analysis of positive ion and negative ion metabolites between cluster 1 and cluster 3. (B) Category of differential metabolites between cluster 1 and cluster 3 (P-value < 0.05, VIP > 1.0). (C) The number of metabolites from different sources. (D) Metabolic pathway enrichment analysis based on the differential metabolites derived from host or microbiota or both. Bar plot on the right of red arrow represents the summary results that differential KEGG pathway matches to the higher classification levels.

After processing of differential analysis and annotation of databases, 226 differential metabolites were screened to do further analysis. Source of the differential metabolites was tracked through MetOrigin platform, and 84 metabolites were found to be originated from the host, 119 from the microbiota, 101 from drug, 190 from food, and 29 from environment (Fig 3C). And 75 metabolites were found to be present both in host and microbiota (S6A Fig). Then, MPEA analysis were performed from MetOrigin platform to map the metabolites sourced from host or microbiota or both to the KEGG metabolic pathways. Suggested by the results, 71 metabolic pathways were identified and arachidonic acid metabolism was the most significant metabolic pathway both in host while degradation of flavonoids was the most significant metabolic pathways in the microbiota source (Fig 3D, S6B and S7 Figs). Furthermore, metabolic pathways with P-values less than 0.05 were matched to KEGG metabolic pathways with higher classification levels, and amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism were found to have the highest proportion of matches (Fig 3D). Finally, KEGG metabolic maps about the significant metabolic pathways were constructed based on the identified metabolites and relative enzyme-coding genes screening by metagenomic analysis (S8 and S9 Figs).

Comprehensive analysis based on the results of multi-omics sequencing

Suggested by the Fig 3D, metabolism of amino acids and lipids was found to be more important in the infected mice after treating with B. amyloliquefaciens for their higher proportions of metabolic pathways with significant changes. So, differential genes related to these two metabolic pathways were screened by metagenomic analysis. The abundance of 24 differential genes were presented, and genes mapping to the valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis were found to have higher abundance in cluster 3 while genes mapping of fatty acid biosynthesis increased in cluster 1 (Fig 4A). Procrustes analysis between abundance of markers (Refer to the Methods and Materials for definition) of microbes, functional genes and metabolites between cluster 1 and cluster 3 was performed in order to clarify the cooperativity of them. The results showed that the abundance changes of any two groups of markers in cluster 1 and cluster 3 were highly correlated (Fig 4B and S10 Fig). Then, Random Forest was used to identify the representative microbes, genes, and metabolites from markers with and without treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens in infected mice. The model explained 94.12% of the species, genes, and metabolites related to treatment of B. amyloliquefaciens. Forty-six important classes were found to have the lowest cross validation error (S11A Fig). Thus, 46 classes as representative species, genes, and metabolites were defined in the model. Suggested by the results, gene ilvC was identified as a top-scoring marker to distinguish infected mice and B. amyloliquefaciens-treated mice (S11B Fig). As representative marker, Limosilactobacillus reuteri and Muribaculum sp002473395 had high abundance and were increased dramatically while Clostridium disporicum decreased immensely in cluster 1. Meanwhile, metabolites with high abundance like 13,14-Dihydro-15-keto-PGE2, 15(S)-HPETE, phosphorylcholine, and prostaglandin H2 were found to be increased significantly in cluster 1. It is worth noting that 3,4-dihydroxyhy-drocinnamic acid sourced from microbiota changed greatly in cluster 1, with a fold change of more than 25 (Fig 4C).

Fig 4. Correlation analysis between intestinal microbiota, functional genes, and serum metabolites.

Fig 4

(A) The abundance of differential functional genes selected from metagenomic analysis significantly changed in metabolic pathway of lipid metabolism and amino acid metabolism in two groups. Different colors of dots display different metabolic pathways. (B) Procrustes analysis of the correlation between differential intestinal microbiota, differential functional genes, and differential metabolites. M2 represents the sum of squares of deviations. (C) Changes of relative abundance of representative intestinal microbiota, biofunctional genes, and serum metabolites selected by Random Forest analysis. Boxplot presents the value of significant difference and fold change of representative intestinal microbiota and serum metabolites between cluster 1 and cluster 3. Red arrows show the enrichment in cluster 1. Blue arrows represent the depletion in cluster 1. The height of the box signifies the level of abundance. Red box characterizes cluster 3 and blue one is cluster 1 in each panel. Differential analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test. * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01. (D) Spearman correlation between representative microbes, functional genes, and serum metabolites. The black dashed lines distinguished the significantly enriched microbes, genes and metabolites in cluster 1 or cluster 3. Different colored lines connected representative microbes, genes and metabolites with strong correlations (spearman correlation is bigger than 0.8, adjusted P-value is lower than 0.05). The stacking column on the right represented microbes that are significantly correlated with metabolites. (E) Potential metabolic reactions based on the results of spearman correlation analysis. Differential analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.

To investigate the correlation of representative microbes, genes, and metabolites, spearman correlation was performed (S12 Fig). Correlations with significant difference values below 0.05 and correlation coefficients above 0.8 were retained (Fig 4D). Indicated by the results, more metabolites involved in lipid metabolism (like glycerophospholipid and arachidonic acid) positively correlated with species and genes in cluster 1. Interestingly, some genes and metabolites belonging to the same metabolic pathway were found to be simultaneously enriched in cluster 1. In valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, leuA encoding enzyme and its products 2-isopropylmalate (from 226 KEGG metabolites but not representative metabolites) acid and 2-isopropylmaleate which were significantly enriched in cluster 1 were found to be belonged to the same metabolic reactions (Fig 4E).

Discussion

B. amyloliquefaciens is a potential probiotic. Its metabolites such as exopolysaccharide and levan have the functions of increasing the adhesion layer and resisting E. coli which can secrete enterotoxin [64,65]. Its properties of resistance to low pH and high temperature enables it to withstand the low pH of gastric juice and reach the colon [66,67]. The probiotic properties of B. amyloliquefaciens enable it to target and adjust the structure and metabolism of intestinal microbiota. Therefore, it has a certain resistance potential to schistosomiasis japonicum, which can cause intestinal granuloma. In this study, B. amyloliquefaciens was administered via gavage to mice infected with S. japonicum. It was found that the symptoms of intestinal granuloma were significantly alleviated by restoring intestinal homeostasis and regulating the physiological metabolism of the host.

Intestinal homeostasis is mainly represented by the process by which the niche of the intestinal microbiota remains stable and undisturbed [20]. Although the composition and abundance of intestinal microbiota have been fluctuating all the time due to external interventions such as diet and probiotics, the core microbiota containing key species remained stable [20]. Through the competition and cooperation within the microbiota, the healthy gut has always maintained a state of dynamic balance [68]. Through the establishment of DMM model and the definition of different occurrence patterns, intestinal dysbacteriosis and the growth of Escherichia Shigella were found to be inhibited after intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens (Fig 1). As a typical pathogenic bacterium, the sharp increase of Escherichia Shigella (relative abundance was close to 50%) occupied limited niche and nutrients in the gut, and other core bacterial genera were excluded by competition resulting in the death and disappearance of other core bacterial genera [69]. The intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens reduced the impact of Escherichia Shigella, which may regulate the homeostasis of intestinal microbiota by antagonizing Escherichia Shigella and enhancing the colonization of other intestinal bacteria (although it cannot restore the intestinal microbiota to the pre-infection state, it reached a different but relatively stable equilibrium state). One speculation is that B. amyloliquefaciens is a microorganism capable of producing exopolysaccharide which can be used as a carbon source by the intestinal microbiota, thereby crowding out pathogenic bacteria to inhibit their colonization and growth [27,70]. Meanwhile, studies have also shown that B. amyloliquefaciens can induce autophagy to kill Escherichia coli [71]. However, the specific mechanism still needs to be studied further. Therefore, B. amyloliquefaciens could be alleviating the dysbiosis of microbiota and remodeling the homeostasis of gut by regulating the competition of microbiota in the niche and its nutrient composition.

One of the ways that probiotics regulate intestinal homeostasis also includes improving the overall structure of intestinal microbiota by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut by promoting the growth of endogenous ideal microbial populations [72]. The growth of E. coli was found to be significantly inhibited (Fig 2C). Through the production of enterotoxins, the massive proliferation of E. coli was fatal to the mucosal barrier of the intestine and the growth of intestinal microbiota [73]. E. coli could not only cause the death and dysbiosis of the microbiota by changing the environment of the colon, but also enhance the high expression of intestinal proinflammatory cytokines (IL-8, TNF-α, IFN-γ) which could become one of the influencing factors of further development of intestinal granuloma caused by S. japonicum [74]. The inhibition of E. coli, which indicated the competitive exclusion effect of the microbiota interaction, may play important role in reducing the symptoms of mice infected with S. japonicum. With the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens, the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut also gradually recovered accompanied by the regression of pathogenic bacteria (Fig 2C). P. distasonis and A. dispar were found to increase substantially. P. distasonis is an emerging intestinal anaerobic bacterium which could regulate the dysbiosis of gut microbiota and have strong co-excluding associations with potential pathogens like Enterorhabdus sp. which are frequently isolated from colitis patients [75,76]. Most studies have demonstrated that P. distasonis conferred colonic protection in inflammatory bowel disease by increasing expressions of IL-10, TGF-β and tight junction protein (such as in six-week-old male A/J mouse models treated with different chow diets laced with P. distasonis or Dextran Sulfate Sodium Salt (DSS)-induced BALB/c mice with oral treatment of P. distasonis) [77,78]. A. dispar is a recently identified bacterium with relatively few related studies. But Alistipes did prove to be a genus that could produce short chain fatty acids [79]. At the same time, some bacteria were also found to recover in abundance after the intervention, such as L. reuteri which has been proved by many studies to make important contributions to the repair of intestinal epithelial cells and mucosa [80,81]. It is worth mentioning that L. reuteri could produce reuterin, an antibacterial molecule that is bactericidal against a wide range of pathogenic species including enterohemorrhagic E. coli strains, which may play an important role in inhibiting the growth of E. coli in this study [82,83]. In a word, the structure and composition of intestinal microbiota in S. japonicum infected mice was improved after the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens, which may play key role in slowing down the pathological symptoms and enhancing vital signs of infected mice.

Metabolites of intestinal microbiota are the bridge and important factor in microbiota-host crosstalk [13]. These metabolites act as signaling molecules in the interaction between the host and microbiota and play a key role in guiding the physiological metabolism of the host. The intervention of probiotics can regulate the secretion of these metabolites, and ultimately improve the host health and prevent diseases through two-way communication between the gut and other organs [84, 85]. Among the metabolites of microbial origin, the metabolites from degradation of flavonoid, tyrosine metabolism and branched-chain amino acids biosynthesis (BCAAs) (valine, leucine and isoleucine) showed significant and representative changes (Fig 3D and S8D Fig). Flavonoids are usually metabolized by intestinal enzymes at epithelial cells or intestinal microbiota for its low bioavailability, and have been generally shown to improve intestinal barrier function and limit the exacerbation of inflammation [86,87]. The interaction with intestinal microbiota enables flavonoids to be metabolized into small molecules, then secreted into the blood or lumen, and transported to distal organs. At the same time, flavonoids are also well known as antibacterial agents against a wide range of pathogenic microorganism and lead to promote the growth of beneficial microbiota such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [8890]. The importance of amino acids in regulating host immune function has been extensively studied. The intervention of probiotics may mediate the synthesis and metabolism of amino acids through their own action or regulating other intestinal microorganisms [91, 92]. Tyrosol, an intermediate product of tyrosine metabolism, has antioxidant and neuroprotective effects, which was found to be significantly positively correlated with L. reuteri and genes encoding enzymes involved in tyrosine biosynthesis [93]. Supplementing DSS-model mice with tyrosol significantly reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Shigella, indicating the potential anti-pathogenic effect of tyrosol [94]. Biosynthesis pathway of BCAAs was found to show significant positive correlation with A. dispar, L. reuteri and glycine, serine, and threonine biosynthesis pathway of microbial origin (Fig 4D). An enrichment analysis summarizing the data of more than 1000 patients with liver cirrhosis found that the intake of BCAAs (Valine, leucine and isoleucine) can improve the incidence of severe liver cirrhosis complications in patients with liver cirrhosis, and reduce liver injury [95]. This also suggested that the amino acid metabolism of intestinal microbiome was important in changes of abundance of amino acids and their derivatives in the host.

The intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens not only regulated the secretion of intestinal microbial metabolites in host, but also regulated the metabolites produced during the process of host physiological activities. After the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens, metabolites from steroid hormone biosynthesis and arachidonic acid metabolism were significantly enriched (Fig 3D). In the steroid hormone biosynthesis, estrogens (Estrone glucuronide, Estriol-16-Glucuronide, 16α-hydroxyestrone) were abundantly increased. Studies have shown that estrogens could alleviate the level of oxidative stress in the body and play an antioxidant role [96,97]. And the increase of estrogens could improve the permeability of the intestine and alleviate the level of inflammation [98]. At the same time, estrogens can interact with a variety of neurotransmitter systems through signaling mechanisms to regulate the physiological and behavioral homeostasis of the host [99]. Arachidonic acids are one of the important components of biofilm phospholipids, and are also the precursor of eicosanoids (prostaglandins, thromboxanes, prostacyclins, and leukotrienes) produced by cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, and peroxidase [100]. Most of the metabolites of arachidonic acids are regulators of intestinal mucosal defense and inflammatory process, which may participate in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory lesions in the intestine [101]. Also, as the one of the important components of biofilms, and glycerophospholipid metabolism has also been found to deplete significantly. Phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidate were found to increase significantly after infection, which was consistent with the results found in patients with schistosomiasis [17,102]. Recent evidence showed that in many cancers, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colon cancer and brain cancer, abnormal metabolism of PC and PE has become necessary conditions to promote tumorigenesis and malignant development, and has recently been further established and consolidated as universal metabolic markers of cancer [103,104]. The abnormally elevated metabolism of PE and PC also promoted the gradual aggravation and deterioration of intestinal inflammation, which gradually developed into cancer [105]. The changes of arachidonic acid metabolism and glycerophospholipid metabolism in infected mice suggested that restoration of disturbance of lipid metabolism in the host after the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens. The changes of metabolites in the host directly reflect the improvement of the physiological health of the host, which also suggested that the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens can regulate the physiological condition of the host and alleviate the physiological metabolic abnormalities caused by schistosomiasis infection.

Our study analyzed the dynamic succession of intestinal microbiota from the perspective of niche competition, traced the source of host serum metabolites, and analyzed the relationship between the secretion of intestinal microbiota metabolites and host physiological metabolites. But we found some areas that need to be improved in our study. The disease progression of schistosomiasis japonica is mainly divided into acute, chronic and late stage, and there are more serious complications in the chronic and late stage [19]. We were not sure if the alleviating effect of B. amyloliquefaciens could be maintained during chronic and late stage. Therefore, longer period of B. amyloliquefaciens intervention is expected to be implemented Although, probiotics have undoubtedly become the most popular intervention targeting the intestinal microbiome and its metabolites in the clinical settings recently, they are not omnipotent. Many previous studies had also found that the use of probiotics may increase the risk of adverse events [106]. Our results also observed that arachidonic acid metabolism mediating pro-inflammatory response significantly increased after intragastric administration of B. amyloliquefaciens (although these metabolites did not change the outcome that granuloma relief) (S8 Fig). Therefore, it suggested that the mechanism of alleviating schistosomiasis japonica by intervention with B. amyloliquefaciens also requires more rigorous researches and elaborated experimental design to clarify. The liver is an important organ for metabolism of the host, which plays an important role in regulating the secretion of various glands and physiological balance, while the infection of S. japonicum leads to liver fibrosis and serious damage to it [107]. The various metabolic pathways identified in this study (steroid hormone biosynthesis, arachidonic acid metabolism, glycerophospholipid metabolism) could also be carried out in the liver. Therefore, the determination of liver metabolites is the plan for the next research, which is of great significance to clarify the mechanism of regulating schistosomiasis japonica through the gut-liver axis. In addition, this study was characterized by the use of multi-omics sequencing technology to clarify the dynamic changes of gut microbiota and the changes of host physiological metabolites, highlighting the microbiome-host crosstalk. However, there is still a lack of exploration on the mechanism through which intestinal microbiota responds to the host’s immune system by its metabolites, which is also the key to clarify how the dialogue between the intestinal microbiota and the host is carried out.

Conclusions

In conclusion, multi-omics sequencing technology was used in this study to jointly analyze the changes in gut microbiota and serum metabolites in mice infected with S. japonicum after intervention with B. amyloliquefaciens. We found that the metabolic pathways of gut microbiota may significantly affected the composition and alternation of serum metabolites in mice in response to intervention, thus potentially correlated with the alleviation of symptoms of schistosomiasis japonica (Fig 5). At the same time, some metabolites with effects of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant were identified through metabolomics analysis, which can be used as candidate substances for studying the alleviation of schistosomiasis japonica in the future, and will further clarify the mechanism by which B. amyloliquefaciens alleviates symptoms of schistosomiasis japonica. Our research demonstrated the potential probiotic mechanism of B. amyloliquefaciens, providing important references for precision drug design based on targeted gut microbiome, and offering new ideas for the prevention and adjuvant treatment of schistosomiasis japonica.

Fig 5. Potential mechanisms by which dynamic changes of intestinal microbiome affect serum metabolites in mice infected with S. japonicum after intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens.

Fig 5

Red in pie plot and histogram plot represented cluster 3 while blue represented cluster 1. Different colors of metabolites represented different sources of metabolites, which green meant microbiota-source and red meant host-source. The patterns in the background were intestine, which meant that metabolic pathways derived from gut microbiota could influence serum metabolites in blood vessels. Red up-arrows represented significant enrichment of microbes or genes or metabolites in cluster 1 compared to cluster 3 while blue down-arrows represented significant depletion. Full-line arrows showed that serum metabolites sourced from microbiota could be generated by gut microbiota-derived metabolic pathways mediated by functional genes. Dashed-line arrows meant that serum metabolites from different source had strong correlation with gut microbiota, but can’t find any microbiota-derived relevant differential functional genes.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Fitting and alpha diversity of DMM cluster.

(A) The robustness of models evaluated by fitting curve. Grey dashed line represented the number of most stable DMM clusters. (B) Genera that contributed the most to the accuracy of the DMM for each cluster. The importance values were log-transformed. (C) Shannon index of each cluster. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test. ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s001.tif (6.4MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Longitudinal occurrence patterns of intestinal bacterial genera in infected mice of four groups.

Genera at five time points were used to summarize the occurrence patterns in the four groups. Dark points represented the presence of bacterial genera (n = 3). White points represented the absence of bacterial genera (n = 0). Light points represented the transition between “presence” and “absence”. The length of the bar represented the counts of each pattern.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s002.tif (12.6MB, tif)
S3 Fig. Taxonomic composition of top 20 abundance species.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s003.tif (6.4MB, tif)
S4 Fig. Species with significant changes in the relative abundance in the gut of S. japonicum-infected mice after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens.

(A) A cladogram showing the discriminated taxa in different groups. (B) A histogram with LDA scores in four groups. Species highlighted in different colors indicate overrepresentation in the corresponding groups. The threshold of significance was set at 0.05. The threshold of the LDA score was set at 3.0.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s004.tif (18.4MB, tif)
S5 Fig. Screening and Enrichment analysis of differential metabolites.

(A) Overlaps of screening of differential metabolites based on VIP value and adjusted P-value. VIP value was calculated by OPLS-DA analysis. P-value was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and adjusted by FDR. (B) Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways based on differential metabolites. Size of the points represented the ration of metabolites enriched in KEGG pathways. The degree of color of points represented the degree of P-value.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s005.tif (12.1MB, tif)
S6 Fig. Overlaps of number of metabolites and KEGG pathways sourced from host and microbiota.

(A) Overlaps of metabolites sourced from host and microbiota. (B) Overlaps of KEGG pathways based on the metabolites sourced from host and microbiota.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s006.tif (3.5MB, tif)
S7 Fig. Significant difference of the enriched metabolic pathways based on the metabolites from host or microbiota or both of them.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s007.tif (9.9MB, tif)
S8 Fig. Differential metabolites with exact sources and potential metabolic pathways of gut microbiota associated with the B. amyloliquefaciens intervention.

(A-E) Representative differential metabolites, relative enzyme-encoding genes, and involved metabolic pathways. The pathways were constructed based on the KEGG metabolic maps. Metabolites were indicated as red (enriched in the cluster 3 group), blue (enriched in the cluster 1 group), or black (none detected) balls. Identified microbial enzyme-encoding genes were represented in boxes (the dashed one means poor abundance). The dashed arrow indicated the potential metabolic process without detection of relevant enzyme-encoding genes. Different colors of circles outside the balls represented the sources of the metabolites. The degree of color of balls represented degree of fold change of metabolites. * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s008.tif (23.8MB, tif)
S9 Fig. Significance analysis of representative differential metabolites and enzyme-encoding genes.

(A-D) Significance analysis of representative differential metabolites with exact sources and enzyme-encoding genes which involved into the KEGG metabolic pathways. * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s009.tif (18MB, tif)
S10 Fig. Procrustes analysis of the correlation between differential intestinal microbiota, differential functional genes, and differential metabolites.

Different colored lines indicate different groups. Squares indicate differential intestinal microbiota, dots indicate differential functional genes, and triangles indicate differential metabolites. M2 represents the sum of squares of deviations.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s010.tif (3.2MB, tif)
S11 Fig. Random Forest analysis of identification of the representative species, genes, and metabolites before and after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens in infected mice.

(A) Line point panel represented 10-fold cross-validation error as a function of the number of input classes used to regress against representative differential metabolites with exact sources and enzyme-encoding genes of two groups in order of variable importance. (B) Identification of representative intestinal microbiota, biofunctional genes, and serum metabolites by applying Random Forests regression of abundance.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s011.tif (10.5MB, tif)
S12 Fig. Spearman correlation between representative differential species, enzyme-encoding genes and differential metabolites.

(A-B) Correlation between microbes with genes, and genes with metabolites. The completeness of circular pies represented the level of correlation. The threshold of P-value was 0.05, and was corrected by FDR.

(TIF)

pntd.0012583.s012.tif (21.9MB, tif)

Acknowledgments

We would like to convey our thanks to Professor Zuping Zhang for selfless assistance during the experiment, and Ms. Ying Xiao and Ms. Qingqun Wang for help when sacrificing mice.

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA012818 and https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA012788.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170071 to YZ and 32300051 to JH) and Central South University Innovation-Driven Research Programme (2023CXQD059 to YZ). The funders played key roles in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, and decision to publish.

References

  • 1.LoVerde PT. Schistosomiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1154:45–70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18616-6_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2014;383(9936):2253–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu P, Wu K, Zhang C, Batool SS, Li A, Yu Z, et al. Advances in new target molecules against schistosomiasis: A comprehensive discussion of physiological structure and nutrient intake. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(7):e1011498. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gobbi F, Tamarozzi F, Buonfrate D, van Lieshout L, Bisoffi Z, Bottieau E, et al. New Insights on Acute and Chronic Schistosomiasis: Do We Need a Redefinition? Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(8):660–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McManus DP, Bergquist R, Cai P, Ranasinghe S, Tebeje BM, You H. Schistosomiasis-from immunopathology to vaccines. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42(3):355–71. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00789-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lengeler C, Utzinger J, Tanner M. Questionnaires for rapid screening of schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(3):235–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McManus DP, Dunne DW, Sacko M, Utzinger J, Vennervald BJ, Zhou XN. Schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0013-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wilson MS, Mentink-Kane MM, Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Thompson R, Wynn TA. Immunopathology of schistosomiasis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85(2):148–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grzych JM, Pearce E, Cheever A, Caulada ZA, Caspar P, Heiny S, et al. Egg deposition is the major stimulus for the production of Th2 cytokines in murine schistosomiasis mansoni. J Immunol. 1991;146(4):1322–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pearce EJ, MK C, Sun J, JT J, McKee AS, Cervi L. Th2 response polarization during infection with the helminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Immunol Rev. 2004;201:117–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pearce EJ, Caspar P, Grzych JM, Lewis FA, Sher A. Downregulation of Th1 cytokine production accompanies induction of Th2 responses by a parasitic helminth, Schistosoma mansoni. J Exp Med. 1991;173(1):159–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ke XD, Shen S, Song LJ, Yu CX, Kikuchi M, Hirayama K, et al. Characterization of Schistosoma japonicum CP1412 protein as a novel member of the ribonuclease T2 molecule family with immune regulatory function. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1962-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Agus A, Clement K, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as central regulators in metabolic disorders. Gut. 2021;70(6):1174–82. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020;30(6):492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, Boccuto L, Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J, et al. Gut Microbiota and Obesity: A Role for Probiotics. Nutrients. 2019;11(11). doi: 10.3390/nu11112690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bastiaanssen TFS, Cowan CSM, Claesson MJ, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Making Sense of… the Microbiome in Psychiatry. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(1):37–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hu Y, Chen J, Xu Y, Zhou H, Huang P, Ma Y, et al. Alterations of Gut Microbiome and Metabolite Profiling in Mice Infected by Schistosoma japonicum. Front Immunol. 2020;11:569727. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.569727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang Y, Wu Q, Zhao L, Xiong C, Xu Y, Dong X, et al. UHPLC-MS-Based Metabolomics Analysis Reveals the Process of Schistosomiasis in Mice. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1517. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou C, Li J, Guo C, Zhou Z, Yang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of intestinal flora between patients with chronic and advanced Schistosoma japonicum infection. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15(1):413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma T, Shen X, Shi X, Sakandar HA, Quan KY, Li YL, et al. Targeting gut microbiota and metabolism as the major probiotic mechanism-An evidence-based review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;138:178–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Molehin AJ. Schistosomiasis vaccine development: update on human clinical trials. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12929-020-0621-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lin D, Song Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Chen F, Du S, et al. Bacillus subtilis Attenuates Hepatic and Intestinal Injuries and Modulates Gut Microbiota and Gene Expression Profiles in Mice Infected with Schistosoma japonicum. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:766205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.WoldemariamYohannes K, Wan Z, Yu Q, Li H, Wei X, Liu Y, et al. Prebiotic, Probiotic, Antimicrobial, and Functional Food Applications of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(50):14709–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kimura K, Yokoyama S. Trends in the application of Bacillus in fermented foods. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;56:36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luo Z, Yan Y, Du S, Zhu Y, Pan F, Wang R, et al. Recent advances and prospects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as microbial cell factories: from rational design to industrial applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022:1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen H, Sun R, Wang J, Yao S, Batool SS, Yu Z, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alleviates the pathological injuries in mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum by modulating intestinal microbiome. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1172298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen YC, Huang SD, Tu JH, Yu JS, Nurlatifah AO, Chiu WC, et al. Exopolysaccharides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens modulate glycemic level in mice and promote glucose uptake of cells through the activation of Akt. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;146:202–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ismail H, Ibrahim D, El Sayed S, Wahdan A, El-Tarabili RM, Rizk El-Ghareeb W, et al. Prospective Application of Nanoencapsulated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on Broiler Chickens’ Performance and Gut Health with Efficacy against Campylobacter jejuni Colonization. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Konieczka P, Ferenc K, Jorgensen JN, Hansen LHB, Zabielski R, Olszewski J, et al. Feeding Bacillus-based probiotics to gestating and lactating sows is an efficient method for improving immunity, gut functional status and biofilm formation by probiotic bacteria in piglets at weaning. Anim Nutr. 2023;13:361–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zeng Z, Zhou Y, Xu Y, Wang S, Wang B, Zeng Z, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 alleviates the obesity of ob/ob mice and improves their intestinal microbiota and bile acid metabolism. Food Funct. 2022;13(9):5381–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen H, Huang S, Zhao Y, Sun R, Wang J, Yao S, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the intestinal microbiome reveals the potential mechanism involved in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in treating schistosomiasis japonica in mice. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(4):e0373523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang S, Cao Y, Lu M, Peng W, Lin J, Tang C, et al. Identification and functional characterization of Oncomelania hupensis macrophage migration inhibitory factor involved in the snail host innate immune response to the parasite Schistosoma japonicum. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47(8):485–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–7. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Robeson MS 2nd, O’Rourke DR, Kaehler BD, Ziemski M, Dillon MR, Foster JT, et al. RESCRIPt: Reproducible sequence taxonomy reference database management. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(11):e1009581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kechin A, Boyarskikh U, Kel A, Filipenko M. cutPrimers: A New Tool for Accurate Cutting of Primers from Reads of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2017;24(11):1138–43. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2017.0096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i90. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Langdon WB. Performance of genetic programming optimised Bowtie2 on genome comparison and analytic testing (GCAT) benchmarks. BioData Min. 2015;8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13040-014-0034-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu J, Breitwieser FP, Thielen P, Salzberg SL. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Computer Science. 2017;3:e104. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Beresford-Jones BS, Forster SC, Stares MD, Notley G, Viciani E, Browne HP, et al. The Mouse Gastrointestinal Bacteria Catalogue enables translation between the mouse and human gut microbiotas via functional mapping. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30(1):124–38 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):417–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(8):2115–22. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chambers MC, Maclean B, Burke R, Amodei D, Ruderman DL, Neumann S, et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):918–20. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smith CA, Want EJ, O’Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal Chem. 2006;78(3):779–87. doi: 10.1021/ac051437y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. [Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Holmes I, Harris K, Quince C. Dirichlet multinomial mixtures: generative models for microbial metagenomics. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Morgan M. DirichletMultinomial: Dirichlet-Multinomial Mixture Model Machine Learning for Microbiome Data. R package version 1.38.0 2022. [ [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6–4 2022. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Feng Y, Zhang M, Liu Y, Yang X, Wei F, Jin X, et al. Quantitative microbiome profiling reveals the developmental trajectory of the chicken gut microbiota and its connection to host metabolism. iMeta. 2023;2:e105. doi: 10.1002/imt2.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12 2019. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: A More Scalable Alternative to Venn and Euler Diagrams for Visualizing Intersecting Sets. R package version 1.4.0 2019. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=UpSetR. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York; 2016. [Available from: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gao C. ggVennDiagram: A ’ggplot2’ Implement of Venn Diagram. R package version 1.2.2 2022. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggVennDiagram. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Thevenot EA, Roux A, Xu Y, Ezan E, Junot C. Analysis of the Human Adult Urinary Metabolome Variations with Age, Body Mass Index, and Gender by Implementing a Comprehensive Workflow for Univariate and OPLS Statistical Analyses. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(8):3322–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xia J, Psychogios N, Young N, Wishart DS. MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W652–60. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yu G, Xu C, Zhang D, Ju F, Y N. MetOrigin: Discriminating the origins of microbial metabolites for integrative analysis of the gut microbiome and metabolome. iMeta. 2021;1:e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and Regression by randomForest 2002. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wei T, Simko V. R package ’corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92) 2021. [Available from: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Harrell JF. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 5.1–0 2023. [Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cai G, Wu D, Li X, Lu J. Levan from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JN4 acts as a prebiotic for enhancing the intestinal adhesion capacity of Lactobacillus reuteri JN101. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;146:482–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang J, Wu XB, Chen HL, Sun-Waterhouse D, Zhong HB, Cui C. A value-added approach to improve the nutritional quality of soybean meal byproduct: Enhancing its antioxidant activity through fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SWJS22. Food Chem. 2019;272:396–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Berikashvili V, Sokhadze K, Kachlishvili E, Elisashvili V, Chikindas ML. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Spore Production Under Solid-State Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Residues. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10(4):755–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Larsen N, Thorsen L, Kpikpi EN, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Cantor MD, Nielsen B, et al. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(3):1105–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fassarella M, Blaak EE, Penders J, Nauta A, Smidt H, Zoetendal EG. Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. Gut. 2021;70(3):595–605. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ducarmon QR, Zwittink RD, Hornung BVH, van Schaik W, Young VB, Kuijper EJ. Gut Microbiota and Colonization Resistance against Bacterial Enteric Infection. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019;83(3). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00007-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rios-Covian D, Arboleya S, Hernandez-Barranco AM, Alvarez-Buylla JR, Ruas-Madiedo P, Gueimonde M, et al. Interactions between Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides species in cofermentations are affected by carbon sources, including exopolysaccharides produced by bifidobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(23):7518–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wu Y, Wang Y, Zou H, Wang B, Sun Q, Fu A, et al. Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 Induces Autophagy to Protect against Pathogens in Macrophages. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:469. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hou Q, Zhao F, Liu W, Lv R, Khine WWT, Han J, et al. Probiotic-directed modulation of gut microbiota is basal microbiome dependent. Gut Microbes. 2020;12(1):1736974. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1736974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang Y, Tan P, Zhao Y, Ma X. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: intestinal pathogenesis mechanisms and colonization resistance by gut microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2055943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gupta T, Kaur H, Kapila S, Kapila R. Potential probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MTCC-5897 attenuates Escherichia coli induced inflammatory response in intestinal cells. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(9):5703–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wei W, Wong CC, Jia Z, Liu W, Liu C, Ji F, et al. Parabacteroides distasonis uses dietary inulin to suppress NASH via its metabolite pentadecanoic acid. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(8):1534–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu D, Zhang S, Li S, Zhang Q, Cai Y, Li P, et al. Indoleacrylic acid produced by Parabacteroides distasonis alleviates type 2 diabetes via activation of AhR to repair intestinal barrier. BMC Biol. 2023;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01578-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ezeji JC, Sarikonda DK, Hopperton A, Erkkila HL, Cohen DE, Martinez SP, et al. Parabacteroides distasonis: intriguing aerotolerant gut anaerobe with emerging antimicrobial resistance and pathogenic and probiotic roles in human health. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1922241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Koh GY, Kane AV, Wu X, Crott JW. Parabacteroides distasonis attenuates tumorigenesis, modulates inflammatory markers and promotes intestinal barrier integrity in azoxymethane-treated A/J mice. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41(7):909–17. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Matsushita M, Fujita K, Hatano K, De Velasco MA, Uemura H, Nonomura N. Connecting the Dots Between the Gut-IGF-1-Prostate Axis: A Role of IGF-1 in Prostate Carcinogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:852382. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.852382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hou Q, Ye L, Liu H, Huang L, Yang Q, Turner JR, et al. Lactobacillus accelerates ISCs regeneration to protect the integrity of intestinal mucosa through activation of STAT3 signaling pathway induced by LPLs secretion of IL-22. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(9):1657–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wu H, Xie S, Miao J, Li Y, Wang Z, Wang M, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri maintains intestinal epithelial regeneration and repairs damaged intestinal mucosa. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(4):997–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Abuqwider J, Altamimi M, Mauriello G. Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Health and Disease. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yu H, Ganas P, Schwendicke F. Environment-Specific Probiotic Supernatants Modify the Metabolic Activity and Survival of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1447. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Agagunduz D, Gencer Bingol F, Celik E, Cemali O, Ozenir C, Ozogul F, et al. Recent developments in the probiotics as live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) as modulators of gut brain axis related neurological conditions. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03609-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Agagunduz D, Kocaadam-Bozkurt B, Bozkurt O, Sharma H, Esposito R, Ozogul F, et al. Microbiota alteration and modulation in Alzheimer’s disease by gerobiotics: The gut-health axis for a good mind. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113430. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhou M, Ma J, Kang M, Tang W, Xia S, Yin J, et al. Flavonoids, gut microbiota, and host lipid metabolism. Eng Life Sci. 2024;24(5):2300065. doi: 10.1002/elsc.202300065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kolli U, Jalodia R, Moidunny S, Singh PK, Ban Y, Tao J, et al. Multi-omics analysis revealing the interplay between gut microbiome and the host following opioid use. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(2):2246184. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2246184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Naeem A, Ming Y, Pengyi H, Jie KY, Yali L, Haiyan Z, et al. The fate of flavonoids after oral administration: a comprehensive overview of its bioavailability. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(22):6169–86. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1898333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang L, Li M, Gu Y, Shi J, Yan J, Wang X, et al. Dietary flavonoids-microbiota crosstalk in intestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis. J Nutr Biochem. 2024;125:109494. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2023.109494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xie Y, Yang W, Tang F, Chen X, Ren L. Antibacterial activities of flavonoids: structure-activity relationship and mechanism. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(1):132–49. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666140916113443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Azhar G, Wei JY, Schutzler SE, Coker K, Gibson RV, Kirby MF, et al. Daily Consumption of a Specially Formulated Essential Amino Acid-Based Dietary Supplement Improves Physical Performance in Older Adults With Low Physical Functioning. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(7):1184–91. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Liu Y, Tian X, Daniel RC, Okeugo B, Armbrister SA, Luo M, et al. Impact of probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on amino acid metabolism in the healthy newborn mouse. Amino Acids. 2022;54(10):1383–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bu Y, Rho S, Kim J, Kim MY, Lee DH, Kim SY, et al. Neuroprotective effect of tyrosol on transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2007;414(3):218–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.08.094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yu F, Hu X, Ren H, Wang X, Shi R, Guo J, et al. Protective effect of synbiotic combination of Lactobacillus plantarum SC-5 and olive oil extract tyrosol in a murine model of ulcerative colitis. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Konstantis G, Pourzitaki C, Chourdakis M, Kitsikidou E, Germanidis G. Efficacy of branched chain amino acids supplementation in liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(6):1171–90. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bellanti F, Matteo M, Rollo T, De Rosario F, Greco P, Vendemiale G, et al. Sex hormones modulate circulating antioxidant enzymes: impact of estrogen therapy. Redox Biol. 2013;1(1):340–6. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2013.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Prediger ME, Gamaro GD, Crema LM, Fontella FU, Dalmaz C. Estradiol protects against oxidative stress induced by chronic variate stress. Neurochem Res. 2004;29(10):1923–30. doi: 10.1023/b:nere.0000042219.98446.e7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Li Y, Wan H, Ma R, Liu T, Chen Y, Dong Y. Chronic Stress That Changed Intestinal Permeability and Induced Inflammation Was Restored by Estrogen. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(16). doi: 10.3390/ijms241612822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jacobs E, D’Esposito M. Estrogen shapes dopamine-dependent cognitive processes: implications for women’s health. J Neurosci. 2011;31(14):5286–93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6394-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Esser-von Bieren J. Immune-regulation and -functions of eicosanoid lipid mediators. Biol Chem. 2017;398(11):1177–91. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2017-0146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vilaseca J, Salas A, Guarner F, Rodriguez R, Martinez M, Malagelada JR. Dietary fish oil reduces progression of chronic inflammatory lesions in a rat model of granulomatous colitis. Gut. 1990;31(5):539–44. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.5.539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Adebayo AS, Mundhe SD, Awobode HO, Onile OS, Agunloye AM, Isokpehi RD, et al. Metabolite profiling for biomarkers in Schistosoma haematobium infection and associated bladder pathologies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(4):e0006452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cheng M, Bhujwalla ZM, Glunde K. Targeting Phospholipid Metabolism in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2016;6:266. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Guo S, Wang Y, Zhou D, Li Z. Significantly increased monounsaturated lipids relative to polyunsaturated lipids in six types of cancer microenvironment are observed by mass spectrometry imaging. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5959. doi: 10.1038/srep05959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Shan S, Wu C, Shi J, Zhang X, Niu J, Li H, et al. Inhibitory Effects of Peroxidase from Foxtail Millet Bran on Colitis-Associated Colorectal Carcinogenesis by the Blockage of Glycerophospholipid Metabolism. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(31):8295–307. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Niu HL, Xiao JY. The efficacy and safety of probiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Evidence based on 35 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;75:116–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Papadopoulos G, Legaki AI, Georgila K, Vorkas P, Giannousi E, Stamatakis G, et al. Integrated omics analysis for characterization of the contribution of high fructose corn syrup to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obesity. Metabolism. 2023;144:155552. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012583.r001

Decision Letter 0

jong-Yil Chai, Fernando Lopes

5 Aug 2024

Dear Professor Yu,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Multi-omics analyses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens treated mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum reveal dynamics change of intestinal microbiome and its associations with host metabolism" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Fernando Lopes, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The study design was appropriate and addressed the objectives, however, authors need to explain the following for clarity:

Line 103: Can authors please explain intragastrical administration in more detail? Is this directly administered in the stomach via needle or oral gavage?

Line 110: Why are only female mice? What was their diet?

Where did authors purchase S. japonicum? Or did authors culture it?

Line 117: How long did it take for cercariae to penetrate skin?

Line 118: What amount of B. amyloliquefaciens was administered? Concentration? It would be beneficial to make a figure outlining time and administration of treatments.

Line 124: How long was the entire study? How long was the treatment?

Line 126: Please explain reasoning for timepoints.

Line 126: How were stool samples collected?

Line 160: Why wasn’t the PBS control group examined?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 1. Line 117: Why were the mice infected with 27±3 cercariae, whereas the usual number is 12 or 20?

2. Line 118: The administration of B. amyloliquefaciens started one week before SJ infection. Normally, the treatment/intervention/eradication should be applied to the models after infection. Why was this timing chosen?

3. Line 123: Why were serum samples collected from the eyeballs instead of the tail vein? The blood-retinal barrier may filter certain metabolites, and this method does not meet the animal ethics requirement.

4. Line 126 and 140: According to lines 112-116, there should be 7 mice in each group. Were stool samples collected from only 3 out of the 7 mice? Additionally, in line 160, it is mentioned that serum samples were collected from 6 out of 7 mice. What were the criteria for selecting these samples? Please clarify.

5. Line 137: Reference #131 summarizes pipelines for the analysis of amplicon and metagenomic data. The author should list the specific tools/methods used in this work.

6. Line 150: Bowtie2 was used for alignment and which tools/script were used for filtration? Line 152: The compositions of human and mouse gut microbiotas are distinct. Why was MGBC (doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.003) not used?

7. Line 155: Salmon can quantify reads, but how to estimate the coverage?

8. Fig. 1B: There should be around 15 time-points as the samples were collected every 3 days. Why was these 5 sampling time points chosen?

9. Fig. 1 and 2: Were the three DMM clusters in Fig. 2 (metagenomic sequencing data) carried over from Fig. 1 (16S)? If so, the dimensionality reduction methods (NMDS or PCoA) should be consistently applied to 16S (Fig. 1A) and the further metagenomic seq data (Fig. 2A).

10. How was the normalization of sequencing data performed?

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The results were presented clearly and match the analysis. Authors did a great job putting the figures together and explaining the results section.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 1. Line 249: How was this 'suggestion' derived? The description for SJBA group should be added.

2. Fig.1E: Is it including all genera list in figure 1C-’Disapperrance’ or as the description in line 259, only including those significantly disappear in any groups that were presented from day zero to 36, but decreased or even got eliminated on day 45, which might be the first two rows? Please clarify in the text.

3. The color codes for clusters 1 and 2 are hard to distinguish, especially in Fig. 2C.

4. Fig. 2B and 2C: '33 representative species were selected by overlapping species set' and shown in Fig. 2C, including 'Unknown species.' What are the six species solely in the 'differential species' category?

5. Line 295: ‘Escherichia coli and Bacteroides stercorirosoris were found to be significantly increased in cluster 3, while Alistipes dispar and Parabacteroides distasonis were found to be significantly increased in cluster 1, which was similar to the analysis results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Fig 2C).’ The 16S analysis compared data within groups over time, whereas the metagenomic data compared different groups at a single time point. The importance of the similarity between them should be stated clearly.

6. Line 299: ‘After mapping differential genes to the KEGG metabolic pathways, 20 metabolic pathways were found to be enriched after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens’. Does this involve all 246 depleted and 1131 increased differentially abundant genes? If so, what is the biological implications of analyzing the depleted and increased genes together?

7. Line 326: ‘the NMDS result of the gut metagenome’ It is inaccurate and informal. Specify which results were consistent.

8. Line 332: ‘226 metabolites annotated to the KEGG database based on the 494 differential metabolites’. should be ‘226 out of the 494 differential metabolites were annotated using the KEGG…’? And, clarify why 1023 differential metabolites were not annotated directly using KEGG, but had HMDB included as a filter step.

9. Fig. 3C: The figure legend mentions 'Pearson' analysis, while the text refers to 'Spearman'. Clarify which analysis was actually used. Additionally, the ‘33 differential species’ were abundant in only one of the clusters (1, 2, or 3). Either remove those from cluster 2 in analysis for Fig. 3C or clarify whether these metabolites were correlated with clusters 1 or/and 3 in the text.

10. Line 376: ‘In order to clarify the cooperativity of the abundance changes of these markers between the two groups, Procrustes analysis was performed.’ This is the first time that ‘markers’ appears. Please clarify what ‘these markers’ include, what ‘two groups’ refer to, and what ‘Procrustes analysis’ was performed on. Also in line 378, specify which 'markers in bacteria, functional genes, and metabolites' were included.

11. Line 380: ‘synergy’ refers to interactions among different components that result in effects greater than what would be expected from their individual actions. While Procrustes analysis can elucidate the correlations between different components within a single sample, it is insufficient to prove the synergy among ‘these makers’.

12. Line 381: ‘the representative species, genes, and metabolites before and after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens’. Should ‘before and after treatment’ be ‘with and without treatment’? If so, what is the difference between ‘markers’ and the ‘representative species, genes, and metabolites’? Specifically, what species, genes and metabolites were applied to Random Forests models to screen for the ‘the representative species, genes, and metabolites’?

13. Fig. 4C: The x-axis title should be ‘% increase in mean squared error’.

14. Line 394: ‘lipid metabolism (like glycerophospholipid and arachidonic acid) had more positive correlation with species and genes.’ The interpretation is inaccurate as the Sankey plot showed the correlations between species and genes, and between genes and metabolites. Besides, it should be revised to ‘more metabolites involved in lipid metabolism correlated with…’.

15. Line 396: ‘metabolites from arachidonic acid metabolism were all enriched significantly in cluster 1’ How were this indicated by the spearman correlation analysis?

16. Line 397: The metabolic pathways were involved by enzymes, not ‘genes’. What kind of ‘sequential’ relationship do the gene-coded enzymes and metabolites show? Did the enzymes coded by tyrA2 and aroF, fabl and melA,ilvC and leuA catalyze the synthesis or degradation of tyrosol and cinnavalininate, 1-acyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and phosphatidylcholine, isopropylmaleic acid, 3-isopropylmalic acid? Besides, these genes and metabolites involving in same pathways in mice, irrespective of B. amyloliquefaciens intervention? What are the biological implications as the results were not interpreted for cluster 1 and cluster 3, respectively?

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Discussion and conclusion were very detailed and well written. Authors explained how the data can be helpful in advancing the use of probiotics like, B. amyloliquefaciens as a treatment for infections.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 1. Line 441: ‘Although the composition and abundance of intestinal microbiota have been fluctuating all the time due to external interventions such as diet and probiotics, the core microbiota containing key species remained stable.’ add citation.

2. Line 453: ‘enhancing the colonization of other intestinal bacteria’. The term ‘other intestinal bacteria’ seems to refer to the ‘46 genera observed to significantly disappear in SJ group’ in Fig. 1D. To support the proposed ‘explanation’ in line 455, most of these disappeared genera should not be other pathogens/opportunistic pathogens. This information also provides evidence for the statement regarding the 'gradually recovered' 'beneficial bacteria' in line 474.

3. Line 456: Add the full name of EPS. ‘EPS which can be used as carbon source by the intestinal microbiota, thereby crowding out pathogenic bacteria to inhibit their colonization and growth’ is not supported by ref #27. Correct the citation.

4. Line 467: The high expression of intestinal pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by E. coli and those involved in the formation of intestinal granulomas are not the same. It is also unclear whether the changes in the intestinal environment caused by E. coli contribute to granuloma formation, or if the altered environment during the granuloma formation process due to S. japonicum infection provides an advantage for E. coli colonization. The causal relationship here is not well-defined, so the term "well proves" is too strong. The similar issue can be found through the discussion. Another example in line 484, the text presents a suggestion or hypothesis, as the improvement of the intestinal microenvironment or the regulation and repair of the intestinal barrier have not been investigated or validated.

5. Line 484: What is meant by ‘granuloma infection’?

6. Line 487: Which ‘opportunistic pathogenic bacteria’ were been inhibited by intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens? The claim ‘intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens inhibited adverse intestinal microbiota (including opportunistic pathogenic bacteria)’ is contradicted by the increased levels of ‘potentially pathogenic’ P. distasonis mentioned in line 477, as well as other opportunistic pathogens such as Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and Erysipelatoclostridium, which were observed to increase in the SJBA group (Fig. 1D).

7. Line 496: ‘the metabolites from degradation of flavonoid’ were not mentioned in the Result section. New result should not appear in the Discussion section.

8. Line 499: ‘Flavonoids are polyphenolic compounds with low bioavailability, which are usually metabolized by intestinal enzymes at epithelial cells or intestinal microbiota’ is not supported by ref #77. Correct the citation.

9. Line 500: 'Its metabolites have been generally shown to improve intestinal barrier function.' Reference #78 supports that 'flavonoids' improve intestinal barrier function, not 'its metabolites.'

10. Line 505: ‘It was worth noting that the changes of 3, 4-dihydroxyhydrocinnamic acid in this process were extremely huge (fold change was close to 26), and there was a significant positive correlation with A. dispar’. The correlation between 3, 4-dihydroxyhydrocinnamic acid and A. dispar were not mentioned in the Result section. New result should not be introduced in the Discussion section. This issue arises multiple times. Please review and revise the Results and Discussion sections accordingly.

11. Besides, what is the biological significance of these correlations to the disease? This problem also appears repeatedly, with results being repeated and some previous findings, like ‘it was related to the immune balance of Th1/2 and Treg/Th17 Cells’ in line 508’ listed in the discussion. Another example is in line 535 to 538. If they do not have a clear biological meaning or relevance to the disease/treatment, these redundant listings should be removed.

12. Line 512: ‘genes expressing tyrosine biosynthesis’ is incorrect. It should be revised to "genes encoding enzymes involved in tyrosine biosynthesis.

13. Line 535: Add citation.

14. Line 570: How do the results from the histopathological analysis and dynamic changes in microbiota support the assertion that the intervention with B. amyloliquefaciens effectively inhibited both the pathological symptoms and the disturbance of intestinal microbiota in mice infected with S. japonicum during the acute stage?

15. Line 602: ‘We found that the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens could restore the dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota in infected mice, promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the intestine, and inhibit potential pathogenic bacteria.’ It should be ‘restore the balance’.

16. Fig. 5: What data was used for the ‘horizontal axis in genes proportion’? Four out of seven functional genes were not mentioned in the text to describe their relative to the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens in mice infected with S. japonicum. Why were they chosen in the illustrated plot?

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Minor revisions

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The manuscript is overly verbose, especially in the Discussion section. The narrative lacks clarity and logical flow. I recommend removing unnecessary and illogical statements and adding appropriate conjunctions to improve clarity and coherence. Additionally, while the study offers insights through metagenomics and metabolomics on the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens in S. japonicum infection, supported by previous molecular findings, it remains speculative. The manuscript should avoid presenting overly definitive conclusions before further validation studies are conducted.

Besides, misleading or incorrect use of concepts can confuse readers and undermine the study's credibility.

1. Line 59: Schistosoma japonicum is not a type of schistosomiasis, it is a species of schistosomes could lead to schistosomiasis.

2. Line 64: The symptoms are primarily found in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and spleen, with kidney involvement reported only in some cases.

3. Line 74: the sentence ‘Intestinal microbiota is a complex community living in the human colon’ might suggest that the intestinal microbiota is exclusive to the colon, which can be misleading since microbiota is present throughout the gastrointestinal tract, including the small intestine.

4. Line 114: Should be ‘adaptive feeding’.

5. Line 174: ‘bin’.

And, please pay attention to the typo, grammatical accuracy and proper formatting.

1. Line 48: the phrase 'secretion of derived metabolites derived from intestinal microbiome in mice' contains a redundancy.

2. Note the use of singular and plural forms. For example, line 284: 'indicates', 'genera'; line 378:’was’.

3. Figure legends and reference list: The name of bacteria and parasite should be italicized.

4. Line 258: typo, ‘Erysipelatoclostridium’.

5. Line 293: ‘between three clusters’, should be ‘among three clusters’.

6. Line 373: ‘related these’ should be ‘related to these’.

7. Numbers at the beginning of a sentence should always be spelled out in words rather than written as Arabic numerals.

8. Line 383: ‘miniest cross validation error’ should be ‘lowest cross validation error’.

9. Line 374: ‘genes mapping of’ should be ‘genes mapping to”

10. Line 371: ‘multi omics’ should be revised to ‘multi-omics’.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Please have authors address the following:

1. Please be mindful of grammar and punctuation.

2. What changes in host metabolism occur during schistosoma japonicum infection?

3. Line 40: Is this the only known drug on the market for this parasitic infection?

4. Line 42: What are the intestinal impacts of schistosome infections?

5. Line 43: What are the clinical symptoms of this infection?

6. Line 51: Can authors elaborate on the “crosstalk” between host and microbiome?

7. Line 63: Where is the fibrosis occurring?

8. Line 88: Species needs to be italicized.

9. Line 160: Why wasn’t the PBS control group examined?

10. Line 282: Can authors please explain the n=0? Is this a mistake?

11. Line 468: Do authors plan on examining the expression any inflammatory cytokines?

12. Line 485: It would be interesting to examine markers of intestinal barrier function such as tight junction proteins and other factors that could impact intestinal permeability. Do authors have any plans on doing so?

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Chen et al., titled “Multi-omics analyses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens treated mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum reveal dynamic changes in the intestinal microbiome and its associations with host metabolism,” explores the role of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in mitigating pathological injuries in mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum by modulating the intestinal microbiome and metabolome. This manuscript builds on a 2023 study by the same group, employing a more comprehensive multi-omics approach and extending the scope of analysis from microbial diversity to more detailed functional and metabolic descriptions. The authors demonstrate the potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in modulating host metabolism, providing a potential new avenue for alleviating schistosomiasis symptoms and lesions through the administration of the bacterium as a probiotic. The study shows that treating mice with B. amyloliquefaciens prior to their infection with S. japonicum leads to alterations in the microbiome, metagenome, and metabolome, which are used to explain how this bacterium alleviates some symptoms of the parasitic infection. I found the findings interesting and consider this a strong continuation of the previous manuscript.

General suggestions:

Improve the readability of the manuscript by making sentences clearer and enhancing the overall phrasing. Many errors could have been caught with a thorough language proofreading. I have included several suggestions below to improve the manuscript, but I must emphasize that this is not an exhaustive list. The authors should make further improvements beyond my suggestions, potentially hiring professional proofreading services.

Discussion section suggestions:

I think that the Discussion section of the manuscript repeatedly presents the results and includes too many speculative propositions, making it difficult to follow. Additionally, it should cite figures when talking about the findings in this study. Overall, the section needs improvement to effectively communicate the contributions and implications of the study in a broader context.

Conclusion section suggestions:

The section repeatedly mentions the intervention of B. amyloliquefaciens, which could be streamlined for better readability. The conclusions are not clearly distinguished from the results and discussion, making it harder to discern the key takeaways. The conclusions could provide more insight into the implications and future directions of the research.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript provides an analysis of the effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on Schistosoma japonicum-infected mice using multi-omics approaches, integrating both metagenomic and metabolomic data to explore changes in the intestinal microbiome and host metabolism. Although the study offers intriguing insights into the potential benefits of B. amyloliquefaciens treatment, the manuscript requires substantial revisions to improve clarity, coherence, and accuracy. The Discussion section, in particular, is excessively detailed and lacks clarity, with many statements being speculative and not well-supported by data, which undermines the overall coherence of the manuscript. Additionally, there are discrepancies between the reported results and the conclusions drawn, especially concerning the effects of B. amyloliquefaciens on intestinal microbiota and pathology. New results are introduced in the Discussion section without prior mention in the Results section, leading to further inconsistencies. Methodological concerns also need addressing, including the timing of B. amyloliquefaciens administration, the choice of blood collection method, adherence to ethical standards in animal research, and consistency in analysis methods.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-00599_review.pdf

pntd.0012583.s013.pdf (82.7KB, pdf)
Attachment

Submitted filename: Review_PNTD-D-24-00599.doc

pntd.0012583.s014.doc (28KB, doc)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012583.r003

Decision Letter 1

jong-Yil Chai, Fernando Lopes

27 Sep 2024

Dear Professor Yu,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Multi-omics analyses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens treated mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum reveal dynamics change of intestinal microbiome and its associations with host metabolism' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Fernando Lopes, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Line 111: Please add citation for previous work. Additionally, can authors please add the total number of study animals used for this experiment?

Other than that, the study is well designed and addresses the objectives.

Reviewer #2: I consider the methods in the revised manuscript to meet all key review criteria required for acceptance.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Yes, the results are presented well and matching the analysis plan. The figures are of sufficient quality.

Reviewer #2: The revised version of the manuscript's Results section effectively satisfy all essential review criteria for acceptance. The analyses conducted are consistent with the analysis plan, and the findings are presented comprehensively. Additionally, all figures and tables are of high quality, showing clarity and ease of understanding.

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes! Authors did a great job explaining the data and answering reviewer questions.

Reviewer #2: The conclusions in the revised manuscript are well-supported by the presented data. The authors describe the study’s limitations and discuss how their findings advance understanding of probiotic interventions in schistosomiasis japonica. Additionally, the public health relevance of their work is appropriately addressed.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Accept

Reviewer #2: Overall, the manuscript meets my standards and is suitable for publication in my opinion.

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Overall, the study is quite interesting and will definitely add to the scope of knowledge in this field.

Reviewer #2: Chen et al. present a good study on the probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Schistosoma japonicum-infected mice. The integration of metagenomic and metabolomic data offers new insights into therapeutic strategies for schistosomiasis japonicum. I find the study to be well designed, with clear presentation of data and good quality figures. The authors have effectively addressed the reviewers' concerns, improving the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. Although based primarily on bioinformatic analyses, the study acknowledges its limitations and suggests lines of research for the future. Overall, this is a good contribution to the field and is suitable for publication.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012583.r004

Acceptance letter

jong-Yil Chai, Fernando Lopes

7 Oct 2024

Dear Professor Yu,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Multi-omics analyses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens treated mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum reveal dynamics change of intestinal microbiome and its associations with host metabolism," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Fitting and alpha diversity of DMM cluster.

    (A) The robustness of models evaluated by fitting curve. Grey dashed line represented the number of most stable DMM clusters. (B) Genera that contributed the most to the accuracy of the DMM for each cluster. The importance values were log-transformed. (C) Shannon index of each cluster. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test. ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s001.tif (6.4MB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Longitudinal occurrence patterns of intestinal bacterial genera in infected mice of four groups.

    Genera at five time points were used to summarize the occurrence patterns in the four groups. Dark points represented the presence of bacterial genera (n = 3). White points represented the absence of bacterial genera (n = 0). Light points represented the transition between “presence” and “absence”. The length of the bar represented the counts of each pattern.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s002.tif (12.6MB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Taxonomic composition of top 20 abundance species.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s003.tif (6.4MB, tif)
    S4 Fig. Species with significant changes in the relative abundance in the gut of S. japonicum-infected mice after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens.

    (A) A cladogram showing the discriminated taxa in different groups. (B) A histogram with LDA scores in four groups. Species highlighted in different colors indicate overrepresentation in the corresponding groups. The threshold of significance was set at 0.05. The threshold of the LDA score was set at 3.0.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s004.tif (18.4MB, tif)
    S5 Fig. Screening and Enrichment analysis of differential metabolites.

    (A) Overlaps of screening of differential metabolites based on VIP value and adjusted P-value. VIP value was calculated by OPLS-DA analysis. P-value was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and adjusted by FDR. (B) Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways based on differential metabolites. Size of the points represented the ration of metabolites enriched in KEGG pathways. The degree of color of points represented the degree of P-value.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s005.tif (12.1MB, tif)
    S6 Fig. Overlaps of number of metabolites and KEGG pathways sourced from host and microbiota.

    (A) Overlaps of metabolites sourced from host and microbiota. (B) Overlaps of KEGG pathways based on the metabolites sourced from host and microbiota.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s006.tif (3.5MB, tif)
    S7 Fig. Significant difference of the enriched metabolic pathways based on the metabolites from host or microbiota or both of them.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s007.tif (9.9MB, tif)
    S8 Fig. Differential metabolites with exact sources and potential metabolic pathways of gut microbiota associated with the B. amyloliquefaciens intervention.

    (A-E) Representative differential metabolites, relative enzyme-encoding genes, and involved metabolic pathways. The pathways were constructed based on the KEGG metabolic maps. Metabolites were indicated as red (enriched in the cluster 3 group), blue (enriched in the cluster 1 group), or black (none detected) balls. Identified microbial enzyme-encoding genes were represented in boxes (the dashed one means poor abundance). The dashed arrow indicated the potential metabolic process without detection of relevant enzyme-encoding genes. Different colors of circles outside the balls represented the sources of the metabolites. The degree of color of balls represented degree of fold change of metabolites. * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s008.tif (23.8MB, tif)
    S9 Fig. Significance analysis of representative differential metabolites and enzyme-encoding genes.

    (A-D) Significance analysis of representative differential metabolites with exact sources and enzyme-encoding genes which involved into the KEGG metabolic pathways. * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01, *** means P < 0.001. Data analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s009.tif (18MB, tif)
    S10 Fig. Procrustes analysis of the correlation between differential intestinal microbiota, differential functional genes, and differential metabolites.

    Different colored lines indicate different groups. Squares indicate differential intestinal microbiota, dots indicate differential functional genes, and triangles indicate differential metabolites. M2 represents the sum of squares of deviations.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s010.tif (3.2MB, tif)
    S11 Fig. Random Forest analysis of identification of the representative species, genes, and metabolites before and after treatment with B. amyloliquefaciens in infected mice.

    (A) Line point panel represented 10-fold cross-validation error as a function of the number of input classes used to regress against representative differential metabolites with exact sources and enzyme-encoding genes of two groups in order of variable importance. (B) Identification of representative intestinal microbiota, biofunctional genes, and serum metabolites by applying Random Forests regression of abundance.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s011.tif (10.5MB, tif)
    S12 Fig. Spearman correlation between representative differential species, enzyme-encoding genes and differential metabolites.

    (A-B) Correlation between microbes with genes, and genes with metabolites. The completeness of circular pies represented the level of correlation. The threshold of P-value was 0.05, and was corrected by FDR.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012583.s012.tif (21.9MB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-00599_review.pdf

    pntd.0012583.s013.pdf (82.7KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review_PNTD-D-24-00599.doc

    pntd.0012583.s014.doc (28KB, doc)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reply to reviewers.docx

    pntd.0012583.s015.docx (21.1MB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA012818 and https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA012788.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES