Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
. 2007 Jul 17;27(6):771–781. doi: 10.1007/s10571-007-9171-z

A Calcium-Receptor Agonist Induces Gustatory Neural Responses in Bullfrogs

Yukio Okada 1,, Kotapola G Imendra 2, Toshihiro Miyazaki 3, Hitoshi Hotokezaka 4, Rie Fujiyama 1, Jorge L Zeredo 1, Kazuo Toda 1
PMCID: PMC11517232  PMID: 17636404

Abstract

The effect of calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) agonists on frog gustatory responses was studied using glossopharyngeal nerve recording and whole-cell patch-clamp recording of isolated taste disc cells. Calcimimetic NPS R-467 dissolved in normal saline solution elicited a large transient response in the nerve. The less active enantiomer of the compound, NPS S-467 induced only a small neural response. The EC50 for NPS R-467 was about 20 μM. Cross-adaptation experiments were performed to examine the effect of 30 μM NPS R-467 and 100 μM quinine on the gustatory neural response. The magnitude of the R-467-induced response after adaptation to quinine was approximately equal to that after adaptation to normal saline solution, indicating that the receptor site for NPS R-467 is different from the site for quinine. NPS R-467 (100 μM) also induced an inward current accompanied with conductance increase and large depolarization in two (13%) of 15 rod cells, and a sustained decrease in outward current and small depolarization in six (40%) other rod cells. NPS S-467 (100 μM) induced a sustained decrease in outward current and depolarization in five (50%) of 10 rod cells. Another calcimimetic cinacalcet (100 μM) induced an inward current accompanied with conductance increase in three (27%) of 11 rod cells. The results suggest that NPS R-467 induces neural responses through cell responses unrelated to a resting K+ conductance decrease.

Keywords: Rana, Gustatory neural response, Ca2+-sensing receptor, Calcimimetics, Patch-clamp, Taste disc cell

Introduction

It has been well known that frog gustatory organs are very sensitive to oral Ca2+ concentration (Zotterman 1949). The Ca2+ response is inhibited by adding salts to the Ca2+ solution (Casella and Rapuzzi 1957; Nomura and Sakada 1965; Junge and Brodwick 1970; Kitada 1978). Studies show that the inhibitory effect of the salts might be due to cations. Kitada (1984) further found that treatment of the tongue surface with pronase potently inhibits the response to Ca2+, but to Na+. The selective inhibition by pronase treatment on the Ca2+ response suggests that the receptive site for Ca2+ in frog taste cells may be different from the site for Na+ and that the Ca2+ site may be a protein. Necturus taste cells also display depolarization in response to Ca2+ (Bigiani and Roper 1991). Ca2+ may inhibit resting K+ conductance, resulting in depolarization of the membrane potential in the taste cells.

Gustatory organs respond to each of the five basic stimuli (salty, sour, sweet, bitter and umami). Salty and sour tastants directly affect ion channels, while sweet, bitter and umami tastants bind to G protein-coupled receptors, initiating intracellular signalling cascades (Lindemann 2001; Gilbertson and Boughter 2003; Chandrashekar et al. 2006). Recent results suggest that tastant binding to the receptors activates the heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαgust and Gαi2) leading to the dissociation of the Gβγ subunits and subsequent stimulation of phospholipase Cβ2 (PLCβ2). Activation of PLCβ2 hydrolyses phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate to produce inositol 1,4,5-trisphospahte (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), and finally activates the transient receptor potential protein (TRIPM5). These signalling cascades suggest that sweet, bitter and umami tastants increase the conductance in taste cells; nevertheless, a conductance increase in native taste cells has hardly ever been recorded in response to those tastants. A recent bioinformatic study showed that Xenopus (frog) possess 49 intact bitter taste receptor (T2R) genes (Go 2006). However, the expression of T2R-like receptors in frogs does not imply that they are really involved in bitter taste transduction. Physiological studies would be required to evaluate the role of these receptor proteins.

In vertebrates, the extracellular Ca2+ concentration in circulating body fluids is detected by various tissues and organs using the extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor (CaR) (Hofer and Brown 2003). The agonist binding to CaR is followed by the activation of various G-protein-coupled intracellular signalling pathways (PLC, PLA and MAPK). The CaR is expressed not only in the cells that maintain systemic external Ca2+ homeostasis (parathyroid cells and several cells in the kidney, etc), but also in other cells with an indefinite role. Several synthetic CaR agonists (calcimimetics) have been developed for the medical management of disorders in Ca2+ metabolism (Nemeth et al. 1998; Nemeth et al. 2004).

The receptive site for frog Ca2+ response has not been identified. It is interesting to examine whether the calcimimetics elicit frog nerve response. In the present study, we report that frog gustatory nerves and taste disc cells can respond to the agonists for CaR, but that calcimimetics-induced frog nerve response is due to an unidentified receptor, not the CaR.

Materials and Methods

Preparation

Adult bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana Shaw) weighing 250–550 g were used for the experiments during April and December. The experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Nagasaki University. The animals were anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 50% urethane saline solution at 3 g/kg body mass. To prevent spontaneous contraction of the tongue, the hypoglossal nerve and the hyoglossal muscle were cut bilaterally. The tongue was fully pulled from the mouth and its base was fixed with steel pins onto a silicone rubber plate in an experimental chamber. For the patch-clamp experiments, taste disc cells were isolated from the tongue of decapitated and pithed animals, as described before (Okada et al. 2001). The fungiform papillae were dissected from the tongue in nominal Ca2+-free saline and stored in Ca2+-free saline containing 2 mM EDTA for 10 min. The papillae were bathed in the same saline containing 10 mM L-cysteine and 10 U/ml papain (Sigma, St Lois, MO, USA) for 10–13 min. The papillae were then rinsed with normal saline, and individual cells were dissociated by gentle trituration in normal saline. Isolated taste disc cells showing a characteristic morphology were readily distinguished from the other cells and classified into rod and wing cells (Okada et al. 1996). Rod cells had one dendrite-like process while wing cells had two or three. Rod cells were used for the experiments, because rod cells, but not wing cells, may be true taste cells (Osculati and Sbarbati 1995).

Nerve Recording

The glossopharyngeal nerves from both sides were dissected from the surrounding connective tissues and cut near the hyoid bone. The nerves were placed over bipolar silver wire recording electrodes and immersed in liquid paraffin. The gustatory neural impulses were amplified, integrated with a time constant of 0.3 s, and recorded on a pen recorder. Peak amplitudes were used as a measure of the neural responses. The adapting and stimulating solutions were flowed on the tongue surface at a rate of 0.5 ml/s with a 10 ml syringe.

Cell Recording

Voltage-clamp recording was performed in whole-cell configuration (Hamill et al. 1981) using a CEZ 2300 patch-clamp amplifier (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The patch pipettes were pulled from Pyrex glass capillaries containing a fine filament (Summit Medical, Tokyo, Japan) with a two-stage puller (Narishige PD-5, Tokyo, Japan). The tips of the electrodes were heat-polished with a microforge (Narishige MF-80). The resistance of the resulting patch electrode was 5–10 MΩ when filled with internal solution. The formation of 5–20 GΩ seals between the patch pipette and the cell surface was facilitated by applying weak suction to the interior of the pipette. The patch membrane was broken by applying strong suction, resulting in a sudden increase in capacitance. Recordings were made from taste disc cells that had been allowed to settle on the bottom of a chamber placed on the stage of an inverted microscope (Olympus IMT-2, Tokyo, Japan). The recording pipette was positioned with a hydraulic micromanipulator (Narishige WR-88). The current signal was low-pass-filtered at 5 kHz, digitized at 125 kHz using a TL-1 interface (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA), acquired at a sampling rate of 0.25–5 kHz using a computer running the pCLAMP 5.5 software (Axon Instruments), and stored on hard disk. The pCLAMP was also used to control the digital-analogue converter for the generation of the clamp protocol. The indifferent electrode was a chlorided silver wire. Capacitance and series resistance were compensated for, as appropriate. The whole-cell current–voltage (I/V) relationship was obtained from the current generated by the 167 mV/s voltage ramp from −100 to + 100 mV. Input resistance was calculated from the slope conductance generated by the voltage ramp from −100 to −50 mV.

Solutions and Drugs

Normal saline solution consisted of (in mM): NaCl 115; KCl 2.5; CaCl2 1.8; Hepes 10; glucose 20. The pH of normal saline and standard K+ internal solutions was adjusted to 7.2 by Tris base. NPS R-467 and S-467 were kindly supplied by NPS Pharmaceuticals (Salt Lake City, UT, USA). NPS R-467 is a phenylalkylamine compound that acts as an allosteric agonist of the CaR (Nemeth et al. 1998). NPS S-467 is the less active enantiomer of NPS R-467 and was used as a control for non-specific effects. The drugs and quinine-HCl (100 μM) were dissolved in normal saline solution. Tablets of cinacalcet-HCl were purchased from Amgen (Luzern, Swizerland). For stock solution, cinacalcet (100 mM) was dissolved in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO). Sample of the stock solution was added to normal saline solution to give the desired final concentration. NaCl (0.3 M) were dissolved in deionized water. The solution exchange was done by gravity flow. The standard K+ internal solution contained (in mM): KCl 100, CaCl2 0.1; MgCl2 2; EGTA 1; Hepes 10. In order to eliminate the outward K+ current, KCl was replaced with CsCl.

All experiments were carried out at room temperature (20–25°C).

Results

Neural Responses Elicited by NPS R-467

Figure 1A shows examples the gustatory neural responses elicited by 1–100 μM NPS R-467 dissolved in normal saline solution after the tongue was adapted to normal saline solution. The responses for R-467 were composed of large transient and small sustained responses. The magnitude of the R-467-induced responses increased with a dose-dependent manner of R-467 (Fig. 1B). The responses were stereo-selective and the R enantiomer was greatly more potent than the S enantiomer. The apparent EC50 for NPS R-467 was about 20 μM. Thus, NPS R-467 dissolved in normal saline solution could induce a large neural response.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Frog gustatory neural responses elicited by 1–100 μM NPS R-467, 10–100 μM NPS S-467 and 0.3 M NaCl after adaptation of the tongue to normal saline solution. All records were obtained from the same preparation. (B) Relationships between the concentrations of agonists and the amplitudes of the neural responses. The plot for NPS R-467 shows an apparent EC50 of about 20 μM. The magnitudes of the responses are expressed as the value relative to the response elicited by 0.3 M NaCl. The values are mean ± S.E.M. and were obtained from 4 to 6 nerves except for 30 μM NPS R-467 (2 nerves)

Cross-adaptation experiments were performed to examine the effect of 30 μM NPS R-467 and 100 μM quinine (a bitter tastant) on the gustatory nerve response. The magnitude of R-467-induced gustatory neural response after adaptation to quinine was approximately equal to that after adaptation to normal saline solution (N = 2, Fig. 2), although the magnitude of the neural response was somewhat uneven. The quinine-induced response was slightly decreased by pre-adaptation to R-467, suggesting that R-467 may have multiple binding sites.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cross-adaptation between 30 μM NPS R-467 and 100 μM quinine on frog gustatory neural response. The upper two records (A and B) are control responses and the lower two records are cross-adaptation responses. All records were obtained from the same preparation

NPS R-467-Induced Current in Frog Rod Cells

Under conventional whole-cell mode in a standard K+ internal solution, we analyzed the effect of 100 μM NPS R-467 on the membrane properties of 15 rod cells. The rod cells displayed resting potentials of −38 to −53 mV (−49.1 ± 2.1 mV, N = 15). The input resistance ranged from 3.6 to 8.8 GΩ (6.3 ± 0.5 GΩ, N = 15) and the membrane capacitance was 4.2–6.2 pF (5.0 ± 0.1 pF, N = 15). In response to 100 μM NPS R-467, only two (13%) of 15 rod cells displayed an inward current accompanied with conductance increase at a membrane potential of −50 mV (Fig. 3A and B). R-467 induced inward currents of −12 and −10 pA at −50 mV in the two cells, depolarized the resting potentials by 20 and 10 mV and decreased the input resistances to 21 and 53% of the controls. The conductance increase gradually became smaller in the presence of R-467, and the sustained outward current evoked by ramp voltage remained after the removal of R-467. Six other rod cells (40%) displayed a sustained reduction of outward K+ current at +50 mV (Fig. 3C and D). R-467 decreased the outward currents at +50 mV from 129 ± 28 pA to 45 ± 15 pA (P < 0.05, N = 6) and depolarized the resting potentials from −42.6 ± 1.4 mV to −39.3 ± 1.0 mV (P < 0.05, N = 6). Seven other rod cells did not show any response to NPS R-467. In five of other 10 rod cells, S-467 also decreased the outward currents at +50 mV from 80 ± 22 pA to 34 ± 12 pA (P < 0.05, N = 5) and depolarized the resting potentials from −50.6 ± 1.8 mV to −39.4 ± 2.6 mV (P < 0.05, N = 5) (Fig. 4). S-467 never induced an inward current accompanied with conductance increase.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The effect of 100 μM NPS R-467 on the membrane properties of frog rod cells. The upper panels (A and C) show the pen recordings of the current signals at a holding potential of −50 mV. The lower panels (B and D) are plots of the whole-cell current/voltage (I/V) relationships produced by a voltage ramp (167 mV/s) from −100 to +100 mV. I/V relationships labelled a to d were obtained at the times indicated by the same letters on the pen recordings. The transient outward current deflections larger than 200 pA on the pen recording A are out of scale. The pipette contained standard K+ internal solution and the bath contained normal saline solution

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The effect of 100 μM NPS S-467 on the membrane properties of frog rod cells. The upper panel (A) shows the pen recording of the current signal at a holding potential of −50 mV. The lower panel (B) is plots of the whole-cell current/voltage (I/V) relationships produced by a voltage ramp (167 mV/s) from −100 to +100 mV. I/V relationships labelled a and b were obtained at the times indicated by the same letters on the pen recording. The pipette contained standard K+ internal solution and the bath contained normal saline solution

Cinacalcet-Induced Current in Frog Rod Cells

Under conventional whole-cell mode in Cs+ internal solution, we analyzed the effect of 100 μM cinacalcet on the membrane properties of 11 rod cells. Although internal K+ was replaced with Cs+, the rod cells displayed small parabolic outward currents in the voltage range of −50 to +50 mV (Fig. 5B) and resting potentials of −31 to −57 mV (−48.7 ± 2.4 mV, N = 11). When 100 μM cinacalcet was added to the bath, the parabolic outward currents gradually decreased, and subsequently transient inward currents accompanied with conductance increase appeared (Fig. 5A and B). The outward currents recovered after the wash-out of cinacalcet. A transient inward current accompanied with conductance increase was seen in only three cells (−23 ± 3 pA at −50 mV, N = 3), while the inhibition of parabolic outward current was seen in all 11 cells.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The effect of 100 μM cinacalcet on the membrane properties of frog rod cells. The upper panel (A) shows the pen recording of the current signal at a holding potential of −50 mV. The lower panel (B) is plots of the whole-cell current/voltage (I/V) relationships produced by a voltage ramp (167 mV/s) from −100 to +100 mV. I/V relationships labelled a to d were obtained at the times indicated by the same letters on the pen recording. The pipette contained Cs+ internal solution and the bath contained normal saline solution

Discussion

Previous studies (Casella and Rapuzzi 1957; Nomura and Sakada 1965; Junge and Bordwick 1970; Kitada 1978) indicated that frog gustatory Ca2+ responses were greatly inhibited by the addition of NaCl to the Ca2+ solution. The addition of NaCl to the external solution also inhibits the activation of the CaR by external Ca2+ (Quinn et al. 1998). CaR exists in numerous regions of the brain (Yano et al. 2004). Extracellular high Ca2+ and CaR agonists activate nonselective cation channels in rat hippocampal and subfornical organ neurons (Ye et al. 1996; Washburn et al. 1999), resulting in the neural excitation. A receptor similar to the brain CaR may reside in frog taste disc cells, but the EC50 (about 20 μM) of NPS R-467 for causing frog neural response was higher than that (1 μM) for increasing intracellular Ca2+ level in bovine parathyroid cells (Nemeth et al. 1998), suggesting that both receptors are not identical. A receptor protein for frog Ca2+ response has not yet been identified. A taste receptor for umami (L-glutamate) may possibly be related to one of brain metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) (Lindemann 2001). Although brain mGluR has a rather large amino-terminal domain, the taste umami receptor has a truncated amino-terminal domain, resulting in the higher glutamate concentrations for umami taste. Thus, the ligand affinity for taste receptors is relatively low.

In Necturus taste cells, it has been suggested that K+ channels work as receptors for sour and bitter tastes (Kinnamon and Roper 1988a, b; Bigiani and Roper 1991). Various compounds such as quinine, protons and Ba2+ all block the voltage-gated K+ channels. Since K+ channels in Necturus taste cells are localized to the apical membrane and maintain the resting membrane potential (Kinnamon et al. 1988), sour (protons) and bitter (quinine) stimuli may directly block the channels, inducing the depolarization of the taste cells. This mechanism may result in a lack of discrimination between sour and bitter taste in Necturus. In contrast, the frog neural responses elicited by protons and quinine are not inhibited by 10 mM Ba2+, which can block the outward K+ currents (Okada et al. 1994). NPS R-467 and S-467 also caused potent inhibition of outward K+ currents in basolateral side of isolated taste disc cells, but S-467 could not elicit the neural response. It is suggested that the transduction mechanism for R-467 does not have relevance to resting K+ conductance block.

In the rod cells accompanied with conductance increase, the conductance increase gradually became smaller in the presence of R-467 or cinacalcet, indicating a transient effect of calcimimetics on conductance increase. Furthermore, a sustained outward current remained after the removal of R-467. This suggests that R-467 induces two different conductances. We suppose that small transient inward currents are caused by a Ca2+-activated non-selective cation conductance (Okada et al. 1998), and that the sustained outward currents is due to a Ca2+-activated K+ conductance (Fujiyama et al. 1994). Similar results were observed in the saccharin-induced response in frog rod cells (Okada et al. 2001).

A diversity of pathways have been hypothesized for the signalling downstream of taste receptors. However, recent studies demonstrated that sweet, bitter and umami tastants use a common pathway (Chandrashekar et al. 2006). Tastant binding to the receptors activates the heterotrimeric G proteins triggering the dissociation of the Gβγ subunits and subsequent stimulation of phopholipase Cβ2 (PLCβ2). Activated PLCβ2 hydrolyses phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate to produce inositol-1,4,5-trisphophate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 releases Ca2+ from the internal store and the following rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration activates the transient receptor potential protein that is a non-selective cation channel. We suppose that NPS R-467 elicits cell depolarization in a similar manner.

In the present study, only 13% of the rod cells displayed the R-467-induced inward current accompanied with conductance increase. A sweet tastant, saccharin (30 mM) also induces the inward current in 23% of the rod cells (Okada et al. 2001). Similarly, Bigiani et al. (1997) observed a transient inward current (about −20 pA at −85 mV) in only 4% of rat taste cells, and sustained conductance decrease (nominal appearance of an outward current of about 6 pA at −85 mV) in 56% of the cells in response to glutamate (umami). These results suggest that the G protein-coupled transduction machinery is expressed in a subset of taste cells. Frog rod cells are classified into type II and III. Type III cells possess voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, but type II cells do not (Suwabe and Kitada 2004). The rod cells in the present study displayed current–voltage (I–V) relationships that were observed in type II cells (data not shown). Mouse type II cells which contain taste receptors and phospholipase C (PLC) lack voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Clapp et al. 2006). The classical synaptic transmission needs voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. The lack of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in mouse and frog type II cells suggest that these cells may use an unknown signalling transmission to the gustatory nerve (Romanov et al. 2007).

The CaR is expressed abundantly throughout the gastrointestinal tract in mammals (Conigrave and Brown 2006) and may have a significant role as an L-amino acid sensor in the tract. CaR-like receptors are also expressed in the olfactory organs of the fish (Naito et al. 1998), and fish can detect the environmental Ca2+ concentration using these receptors (Hubbard et al. 2002).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Edward F. Nemeth of NPS Pharmaceuticals (Salt Lake City, UT, USA) for the generous gifts of NPS R-467 and S-467. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid (17570064) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to Y.O.

References

  1. Bigiani AR, Roper SD (1991) Mediation of responses to calcium in taste cells by modulation of a potassium conductance. Science 252:126–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigiani AR, Delay RJ, Chaudhari N, Kinnamon SC, Roper SD (1997) Responses to glutamate in rat taste cells. J Neurophysiol 77:3048–3059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Casella C, Rapuzzi G (1957) Azione dell’acqua, del CaCl2 e del NaCl sui ricettori linguali della Rana. Arch Sci Biol Bologna 41:191–203 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chandrashekar J, Hoon MA, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS (2006) The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 444:288–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clapp TR, Medler KF, Damak S, Margolskee RF, Kinnamon SC (2006) Mouse taste cells with G protein-coupled taste receptors lack voltage-gated calcium channels and SNP-25. BMC Biol 4:7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conigrave AD, Brown EM (2006) Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. II. L-amino acid sensing by calcium-sensing receptors: implications for GI physiology. Am J Physiol 291:G753–G761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujiyama R, Miyamoto T, Sato T (1994) Differential distribution of two Ca2+-dependent and -independent K+ channels throughout receptive and basolateral membranes of bullfrog taste cells. Pflügers Arch 429:285–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbertson TA, Boughter JD Jr (2003) Taste transduction: appetizing times in gustation. Neuroreport 14:905–911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Go Y (2006) Lineage-specific expansions and contractions of the bitter taste receptor gene repertoire in vertebrates. Mol Biol Evol 23:964–972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391:85–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hofer AM, Brown EM (2003) Extracellular calcium sensing and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:530–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hubbard PC, Ingleton PM, Bendell LA, Barata EN, Canario AV (2002) Olfactory sensitivity to changes in environmental [Ca2+] in the freshwater teleost Carassiusauratus: an olfactory role for the Ca2+-senseing receptor? J Exp Biol 205:2755–2764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Junge D, Brodwick MS (1970) Stimulation of frog gustatory units by calcium. Comp Biochem Physiol 35:623–630 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kinnamon SC, Roper SD (1988a) Evidence for a role of voltage-sensitive apical K+ channels in sour and salt taste transduction. Chem Senses 13:115–121 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kinnamon SC, Roper SD (1988b) Membrane properties of isolated mudpuppy taste cells. J Gen Physiol 91:351–371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kinnamon SC, Dionne VE, Beam KG (1988) Apical localization of K+ channels in taste cells provides the basis four sour taste transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7023–7027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kitada Y (1978) Inhibitory effects of cations on the Ca2+ response of water fibers in the frog tongue. Jpn J Physiol 28:413–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitada Y (1984) Two different receptor sites for Ca2+ and Na+ in frog taste responses. Neurosci Lett 47:63–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindemann B (2001) Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature 413:219–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Naito T, Saito Y, Yamamoto J, Nozaki Y, Tomura K, Hazama M, Nakanishi S, Brenner S (1998) Putative pheromone receptors related to the Ca2+-sensing receptor in Fugu. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5178–5181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nemeth EF, Steffey ME, Hammerland LG, Hung BC, Van Wagenen BC, DelMar EG, Balandrin MF (1998) Calcimimetics with potent and selective activity on the parathyroid calcium receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4040–4045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nemeth EF, Heaton WH, Miller M, Fox J, Balandrin MF, Van Wagenen BC, Colloton M, Karbon W, Scherrer J, Shatzen E, Rishton G, Scully S, Qi M, Harris R, Lacey D, Martin D (2004) Pharmacodynamics of the type II calcimimetic compound cinacalcet HCl. J Pharmacol Exptl Ther 308:627–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nomura H, Sakada S (1965) On the “water response” of frog’s tongue. Jpn J Physiol 15:433–445 [Google Scholar]
  24. Okada Y, Miyamoto T, Sato T (1994) Activation of a cation conductance by acetic acid in taste cells isolated from the bullfrog. J Exp Biol 187:19–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Okada Y, Fujiyama R, Miyamoto T, Sato T (1996) Vasopressin modulates membrane properties of taste cells isolated from bullfrogs. Chem Senses 21: 739–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Okada Y, Fujiyama R, Miyamoto T, Sato T (1998) Inositol 1,4,5-trisphophate activates non-selective cation conductance via intracellular Ca2+ increase in isolated frog taste cells. Eur J Neurosci 10:1376–1382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Okada Y, Fujiyama R, Miyamoto T, Sato T (2001) Saccharin activates cation conductance via inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate production in a subset of isolated rod taste cells in the frog. Eur J Neurosci 13:308–314 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Osculati F, Sbarbati A (1995) The frog taste disc: a prototype of the vertebrate gustatory organ. Prog Neurobiol 46:351–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Romanov RA, Rogachevskaja OA, Bystrova MF, Jiang P, Margolskee RF, Kolesnikov SS (2007) Afferent neurotransmission mediated by hemichannels in mammalian taste cells. EMBO J 26:657–667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Quinn SJ, Kifor O, Trivedi S, Diaz R, Vassilev P, Brown E (1998) Sodium and ionic strength sensing by the calcium receptor. J Biol Chem 273:19579–19586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Suwabe T, Kitada Y (2004) Voltage-gated inward currents of morphologically identified cells of the frog taste disc. Chem Senses 29:61–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Washburn DL, Smith PM, Ferguson AV (1999) Control of neuronal excitability by an ion-sensing receptor (correction of anion-sensing). Eur J Neurosci 11:1947–1954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yano S, Brown EM, and Chattopadhyay N (2004) Calcium-sensing recptor in the brain. Cell Calcium 35:257–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ye C, Kanazirska M, Quinn S, Brown EM, Vassilev PM (1996) Modulation by polycationic Ca2+-sensing receptor agonists of nonselective cation channels in rat hippocampal neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 224:271–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zotterman Y (1949) The responses of the frog’s taste fibres to the application of pure water. Acta Physiol Scand 18:181–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES