Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 29.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2023 Jun 15;148(3):286–296. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001153
Reviewer Employment Research
grant
Other
research
support
Speakers’
bureau/
honoraria
Expert
witness
Ownership
interest
Consultant/
advisory
board
Other
Olamide Alabi Emory University School of Medicine None None None None None None None
Daniel J. Bertges University of Vermont Medical Center None None None None None None None
Parveen K. Garg University of Southern California None None None None None None None
Andrew M. Goldsweig Baystate Medical Center None None None None None None None
Rajesh Gupta University of Toledo Medical Center None None None None None None None
Francesco Torella Liverpool University Hospitals (United Kingdom) None None None None None None None
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $5 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $5 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.
*
Modest.
Significant.