ABSTRACT
The process of adenosine deaminase (ADAR)-catalyzed double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I) editing is essential for the correction of pathogenic mutagenesis, as well as the regulation of gene expression and protein function in mammals. The significance of dsRNA A-to-I editing in disease development and occurrence is explored using inferential statistics and cluster analyses to investigate the enzymes involved in dsRNA editing that can catalyze editing sites across multiple biomarkers. This editing process, which occurs in coding or non-coding regions, has the potential to activate abnormal signalling pathways that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Notably, the ADAR family enzymes play a crucial role in initiating the editing process. ADAR1 is upregulated in most diseases as an oncogene during tumorigenesis, whereas ADAR2 typically acts as a tumour suppressor. Furthermore, this review also provides an overview of small molecular inhibitors that disrupt the expression of ADAR enzymes. These inhibitors not only counteract tumorigenicity but also alleviate autoimmune disorders, neurological neurodegenerative symptoms, and metabolic diseases associated with aberrant dsRNA A-to-I editing processes. In summary, this comprehensive review offers detailed insights into the involvement of dsRNA A-to-I editing in disease pathogenesis and highlights the potential therapeutic roles for related small molecular inhibitors. These scientific findings will undoubtedly contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine based on dsRNA A-to-I editing.
KEYWORDS: Double Stranded RNA (dsRNA) Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I) Editing, Adenosine Deaminases (ADAR) Enzyme, Pathogenesis, RNA Modification, Tumorigenicity
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing can regulate the pathogenesis of a wide range of diseases. In our manuscript, we have summarized and reviewed the underlying mechanisms behind its action.
1. Introduction
The process of RNA editing is widely recognized as a post-transcriptional mechanism for RNA processing, which induces modifications in the nucleotide sequence of the encoded RNA within each gene. This intricate process encompasses nucleotide insertion or deletion, along with nucleobase deamination [1–3]. The eukaryotic RNA transcriptome frequently undergoes various types of post-transcriptional RNA modifications. Unlike DNA, RNA editing provides the ability for tunability and reversibility [4]. Moreover, it does not result in permanent changes to the genome, ensuring enhanced security and leveraging efficient delivery of genetic information. Recent studies have emphasized the pivotal role of RNA editors in disease progression. Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing represents a significant mechanism for epigenetic modification and is the most prevalent type of RNA modification observed in mammals [5]. The catalytic process involves the action of adenosine deaminase (ADAR) on double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), which are specifically recognized by a family of enzymes known as ADARs [1]. The process can enzymatically convert the adenosine base within an RNA molecule to an inosine (guanine) base, potentially leading to genetic disorders during the delivery or transmission of genetic information. (Figure 1A) [6]. The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing enhances the diversity of transcriptome and proteome specifically, while maintaining the integrity of the genome sequence [7]. Meanwhile, it can also exert an impact on various aspects, encompassing RNA splicing, translation, exportation, localization, stability, and biogenesis of non-coding RNAs such as miRNAs and circular RNAs [8–10]. The alterations in the targeted gene sequence for editing may disrupt the formation of correlated dsRNA structures, resulting in heterogeneous translational production. Moreover, it can impact the interaction between transcriptomes and other molecules, thereby influencing their regulatory functions. Due to its pivotal role in ageing, growth, development, and pathogenesis processes; dsRNA A-to-I editing contributes to a wide range of consequences spanning from single nucleotide mutations to genome-wide genetic alterations [11]. The subsequent section provides a comprehensive summary and analysis of the pathogeneses involved or induced by this process, thereby emphasizing its indispensable roles in therapeutic treatments for related diseases.
Figure 1.

The biosynthesis process of dsRNA A-to-I transformation. (A) The ADAR enzymes facilitate the enzymatic conversion of adenosine base to inosine (guanine) base, thereby effecting the transformation of adenosine into inosine within the dsRNA molecule. (B) The ADAR family of proteins exhibit distinct domain structures, consisting of varying numbers of dsRNA-binding domains and catalytic deaminase domains. Notably, two isomers of ADAR1 (p110 and p150), represented by different shades of purple coloration in gene structures, possess distinctive Z-DNA binding domains. Specifically, ADAR1p150 contains two Z-DNA binding domains (Zα, Zβ) at the N-terminus while ADAR1p110 has one Z-DNA binding domain (Zβ) located close to the N-terminus within its gene structure. Furthermore, ADAR3 encompasses an arginine-rich domain highlighted in green.
2. dsRNA A-to-I editing and the ADAR enzyme
2.1. ADAR enzyme
The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing is primarily catalyzed by enzymes belonging to the ADAR family. As illustrated in Table 1, the key members of the ADAR family encompass ADAR1, ADAR2 (ADARB1), and ADAR3 (ADARB2) (Figure 1B). The enzyme variant of ADAR1 consists of two common transcriptome members: ADAR1p150 and ADAR1p110. Similarly, ADAR2 has two subtype variants: ADAR2a (ADAR2S) and ADAR2b (ADAR2L) [12]. Both ADAR1 and ADAR2 are widely expressed in various human tissues for the recognition and catalysis of dsRNA editing. However, unlike other members, ADAR3 is predominantly expressed in the human brain without exhibiting deaminase activity [13]. ADAR1 is primarily responsible for editing repetitive sequences, while ADAR2 is accountable for modifying the coding region of mRNA. In contrast, ADAR3 inhibits the activity of both ADAR1 and ADAR2 by segregating their respective substrates [14]. The deficiency of ADAR1 in mice lasts for approximately one week, during which a significant number of mice exhibit severe phenotypes such as neuronal apoptosis, erythropoiesis defects, and congenital immune response abnormalities [15]. The survival of newborn mice lacking ADAR2 is limited to three weeks after the occurrence of recurrent epilepsy, which is characterized by neuronal death due to excessive influx of Ca2+ (attributed to insufficient GluA2 Q/R site editing caused by the absence of ADAR2). However, incorporating the GluA2 Q/R site at the genomic level can rescue the lethal phenotype resulting from ADAR2 deficiency [16,17]. In contrast to the phenotypes observed in mice lacking ADAR1 or ADAR2, each of the ADAR3-deficient mice (C57BL/6N) exhibits an increase in anxiety levels, respiratory distress dependent on hippocampal function, and impairment in long-term memory formation [18].
Table 1.
ADAR1, ADAR2 and ADAR3 and their connections.
| ADAR | Subtype | Intracellular Localization | Expression Site | Missing Consequences | Differences in Gene Structure | Interact | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADAR1 | ADAR1 p150 | Nucleus and Cytoplasm | Most Human Tissues | Hematopoietic Deficiency; Embryonic Lethality | ADAR1 has a Z-DNA Binding Domain on the N-terminal Side and An Arginine Rich Domain on ADAR2 and ADAR3. | Competitive Antagonism of ADAR3 with ADAR1 and ADAR2 Inhibits dsRNA Editing from A to I. |
[19] [20] [14] [12] [21] [81] [18] |
| ADAR1 p110 | Nucleus | ||||||
| ADAR2 | ADAR2a | Nucleus (Nucleolus) | Brain, Heart, Lung, Liver and Kidney | Epilepsy | |||
| ADAR2b | |||||||
| ADAR3 | N/A | N/A | Brain | Anxious; Impaired Memory |
2.2. dsRNA A-to-I editing and other RNA modifications
Until now, more than hundreds of RNA modifications have been discovered [22]. Among them, certain modifications with a high occurrence rate are particularly significant, such as N6-adenosine methylation (m6A), cytosine hydroxylation (m5C), N1-adenosine methylation (m1A), N7-methylguanosine methylation (m7G), N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C), and RNA pseudo adenylation. Aberrations in the expression or function of enzymes involved in RNA modifications can give rise to various disorders, including tumorigenesis, neurological and neurodegenerative symptoms, as well as embryonic growth retardation. For example, m6A modification is typically regulated by methyltransferases (METTL3, METTL14, METTL16, WATP) and demethylases (FTO, ALKBH5). The complex formed by methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14 plays a tumor-inhibitory role in endometrial carcinoma. Mutations in METTL14 or down-regulation of METTL3 lead to reduced levels of m6A methylation. These alterations contribute to increased proliferation and tumorigenicity of endometrial cancer through activation of the AKT pathway [23]. The m6A eraser enzyme FTO facilitates melanoma tumorigenesis and confers resistance to immunotherapy by actively transporting m6A into mRNA, thereby augmenting its stability [24]. Further investigations have revealed that A-to-I editing and m6A can interact by modulating the expression of their key enzymes. For instance, ADAR1 interacts with METTL3 to facilitate the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast carcinoma (BC) via the ADAR1-METTL3-YTHDF1 axis. Additionally, loss of ADAR1 impedes BC growth while simultaneously limiting METTL3 and ARHGAP5 in vivo; thus establishing an ADAR1-METTL3 axis as a novel pathway linking dsRNA A-to-I editing with m6A RNA modification during the progression of BC deterioration [25].
The occurrence of base substitutions for dsRNA editing extends to non-coding regions as well. There are numerous modifications in the activities of RNA bases in some non-coding RNAs’ transcriptions, including miRNAs [3,26], mRNAs [3,27], siRNAs [3,28], tRNAs [29,30], snRNAs [31], snoRNAs [32], IncRNAs [33], etc. The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing is a dynamic progression that generates diverse transcriptomes, thereby inducing non-synonymous codon changes or splicing events in various RNA species during transcription processes and even disrupting miRNA maturation [34]. The evidence indicates that miRNA-487b A-to-I editing is a selective process occurring at multiple domain sites following ischaemia, and the overexpression of edited miRNA-487b may ultimately promote angiogenesis [35]. The majority of dsRNA A-to-I editing occurs at various sequence sites within the non-coding region of the gene, predominantly affecting miRNAs due to their high recruitment and binding factors in such regions. In comparison to normal melanocytes, ADAR1 is specifically downregulated in metastatic melanoma, resulting in a lack of editing for two specific miRNAs (mir-455-5p and mir-378-3p). This further promotes tumour progression by increasing their transcriptome numbers. [36].
In summary, the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing facilitated by the ADAR family is a crucial step in mature RNA biosynthesis and plays a pivotal role in the onset and progression of various diseases. Consequently, this review will provide an overview of the involvement or induction of pathogenesis through dsRNA A-to-I editing.
3. Disease and dsRNA A-to-I editing
The ADAR enzyme plays a pivotal role in the occurrence and progression of disease by regulating the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing. Initially, ADAR1 impacts specific cellular sensors, subsequently influencing associated or induced pathogenesis. For instance, it can initially bind to dsRNA derived from endogenous retroviral elements (EREs), thereby attenuating its ability to activate host dsRNA sensors. Cellular dsRNA sensors such as MDA-5 and PKR, along with ZBP1, possess the capability to discriminate and eliminate exogenous dsRNA while inducing interferon (IFN) production upon detection of exogenous nucleic acids. The process of ADAR1-mediated A-to-I editing of dsRNA prevents activation of the sensor MDA-5 and PKR [37]. The dsRNA-binding domain is recognized by ADAR1, which effectively inhibits the amplification of immune response mediated by host MDA-5 [38]. Additionally, ADAR1 has been found to inhibit another dsRNA sensor known as PKR. PKR is a cytoplasmic pattern recognition receptor (PRR) that forms dimers, undergoes auto-phosphorylation, and subsequently phosphorylates the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) upon recognition of dsRNA [39]. Phosphorylation of eIF2α leads to global translation retardation which hampers viral replication. The activation of ZBP1 leads to caspase-8-dependent apoptosis and MLKL-mediated necroptosis in ADAR1-deficient cells [40]. The reason for this is that ZBP1 functions as a sensor for left-handed Z-nucleic acids, while ADAR1 acts as an inhibitor of IFN signalling to protect organisms from disease-associated IFN activation [38,41]. Abnormal expression levels of ADAR1 result in an augmented production of IFNs, which may partially contribute to the enhancement of autoimmunity and the induction of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [42]. The implication is that the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing mediated by ADAR1 is associated with autoimmune diseases.
The significance of dsRNA A-to-I editing in bacterial-viral immunity should be emphasized. Certain viruses produce dsRNA during transcription and replication, leading to a predominant occurrence of A-to-I editing in viral dsRNA intermediates [43,44]. The ADAR1 protein exerts a significant impact on viral immune responses by suppressing the RNA sensing pathways that are orchestrated through the ADAR1-dsRNA-MDA5 axis [43]. ADAR1 can discriminate between endogenous and exogenous dsRNA production during viral infection [38], which serves as a hallmark of antiviral defense. Exogenous dsRNA from viruses is recognized by PRRs and MDA5, major components of the innate immune sensing pathway. MDA5 aggregates on unedited dsRNA and assembles into filaments [45–48]. The activation signals mediated by the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein result in enhanced phosphorylation of transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7. Subsequently, these transcription factors translocate to the nucleus and promptly induce the expression of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes, thereby eliciting proinflammatory and antiviral responses. The clues presented here demonstrate that ADAR1 can impede the activation of MDA5 and PKR-mediated viral replication [49]. Such phenomena contribute to viral fitness switching, immune evasion, or treatment resistance [50–53]. The knockout of ADAR1 in HeLa cells notably leads to immune activation, which hinders viral replication [54]. The inhibition of ADAR1 could potentially hinder viral replication while simultaneously augmenting the host’s antiviral immune responses.
The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing may exert substantial impacts on neuronal protrusion activity. The AMPA receptor, a subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors, plays a crucial role in synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system [55]. The mammalian AMPA receptor consists of four sub-units: GluA1, GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 [56]. Among these subunits, GluA2 is the first to exhibit A-to-I editing sites within its encoded dsRNA sequence domains in mammals [57]. The mRNA transcripts encoding the GluA2 subunit undergo an ADAR2-mediated dsRNA A-to-I editing process that converts the Glutamine codon (Q) to the Arginine codon (R) [58]. This substitution from neutral amino acid residues to positively charged ones significantly reduces Ca2+ permeability in the receptor. Notably, GluA2 Q/R site editing plays a critical physiological role in the mammalian central nervous system. Moreover, it serves as a primary target for ADAR2 enzyme activity; failure or prevention of editing at this site facilitates Ca2+ influx through AMPA receptors and leads to excitotoxic neuronal necrosis [16,59]. These findings highlight that ADAR2-edited GluA2 Q/R site is an important regulatory target in brain function. The serotonin receptor (5-HT), belonging to GPCRs, is located on cellular surfaces and primarily regulates circadian rhythms, mood, appetite, and sexual behavior. Among 5-HT receptor family members regulated by ADAR enzymes within central nervous system dsRNA molecules is 5-HT2C receptor (5-HT2CR) [60]. Within the pre-mRNA structure of 5-HT2CR receptor gene locus V exon region lies five adenosine residues targeted by ADAR enzymes at sites A to E. Editing at sites A to C specifically involves ADAR1 while D site editing differs [61].
The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing plays a certain role in regulating the proliferation or apoptosis pathways of abnormal cells in multiple diseases. ADAR2 upregulates the level of the cell division cycle 14B (CDC14B) mRNA and inhibits cell cycle progression during the G1/S transition by the effect of CDC14B on the Skp/p27/p21 pathway, and then reduces cell proliferation [62]. Also, as one of the tumor suppressors, bladder cancer-associated protein (BLCAP) inhibits cell proliferation but drives carcinoma apoptosis [63,64]. ADAR2 is the primary editor of BLCAP, specifically increasing cell proliferation by activating the Akt/mTOR signalling pathway or STAT3 [65,66]. JAKs further transduce ligand-binding signals through phosphorylation of STATproteins to influence downstream cytokine function for answering the immune response [67]. Dysregulation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway may lead to a range of autoimmune diseases, with ADAR1 inactivating or blocking the upstream JAK/STAT pathway via TYK2 inhibition, impairing the self-renewal and stemness of glioblastoma stem cells [68]. Those reflect the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing may intervene in the development of disease through the regulation of this pathway.
The ADAR-catalyzed dsRNA A-to-I editing process has a significant impact on protein expression. ADAR1 can convert Serine (Ser) to Glycine (Gly) by editing AZIN1, which also induces the cytoplasmic translocation of AZIN1 to the nucleus. This translocation leads to more aggressive tumor behavior and has been observed in liver carcinomas [69]. On the other hand, ADAR2 catalyzes dsRNA A-to-I editing in SLC22A3, resulting in the replacement of Asparagine with Aspartic acid. This process is elevated in tumor tissues from familial oesophageal carcinomas, leading to decreased expression of SLC22A3 and restricted metastasis [70]. Notably, no functional differences have been observed between ADAR1 and ADAR2 when they simultaneously catalyze dsRNA A-to-I editing processes in either liver or oesophageal carcinomas. MYC is a consistently upregulated protein found in many tumors. ADAR1 regulates MYC expression through the PI3K/AKT pathway. Aberrant MYC expression has been shown to affect resistance to bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors in pancreatic cancer (PC). Interestingly, higher levels of ADAR1 expression are positively correlated with resistance to these inhibitors. These findings suggest that combining BET inhibitors with ADAR1 inhibitors holds promise for optimizing treatment outcomes for PC [71]. The PODXL gene encodes a protein that is specifically regulated by ADAR2, which mediates the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing. This editing results in the substitution of Histidine with Arginineat codon 241 of PODXL, leading to a loss-of-function phenotype that neutralizes the tumorigenic capacity of unedited PODXL [72]. Furthermore, mutations in genes encoding ADAR family enzymes may contribute to the occurrence and development of abnormalities related to dsRNA-induced or -involved pathogenesis. Mutations in ADAR1 can cause Z-RNA accumulation and activate the Z-RNA sensor ZBP1, potentially leading to RIPK3-mediated necroptosis [42]. These conditions also play a role in autoimmune diseases such as Aicardi-Goutières syndrome(AGS) and asymmetrical hereditary pigmentation [73].
As previously mentioned, a growing body of evidence consistently demonstrates the correlation between disruptions in human dsRNA editing and aberrant ADAR enzymes with diverse pathogeneses, including tumorigenicity, autoimmune disorders, neurological and neurodegenerative symptoms, as well as metabolic diseases (Table 2, Figure 2). A comprehensive review and summary of these findings is currently underway.
Table 2.
Diseases and dsRNA A-to-I editing.
| Diseases | ADAR | Site Position | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | ADAR2 | GluA2 Q/R Site | [76] [77] |
| Epilepsy | ADAR2 | GluA2 Q/R Site | [84] [59] |
| Bilateral Striatal Necrosis (BSN) | ADAR1 | G1007R、P193A | [85] [87] |
| Depression and Schizophrenia | ADAR1/ADAR2 | 5-HT2CR | [15] [89] [93] |
| Aicardi Goutières Syndrome (AGS) | ADAR1 | MDA5、P193A、G1007R | [73] [95] |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | ADAR1 | N/A | [99] [100] |
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | ADAR1 ADAR2 | PDE8A1 | [101] [99] [102] |
| Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) | ADAR1/ADAR2 | AZIN1/COPA | [106] [106] |
| Astrocytoma | ADAR2 | GluA2 Q/R site | [112] [113] |
| Breast Carcinoma (BC) | ADAR1 | N/A | [116] [119] [123] |
| Pancreatic Cancer (PC) | ADAR1 | circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1 | [124] |
| Gastric Cancer(GC) | ADAR1/ADAR2 | PODXL | [72] [125] |
| Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) | ADAR1/ADAR2 | N/A | 88+89 [126] [127] |
| Cervical Carcinoma (CC) | ADAR1 | N/A | [65] |
| Thyroid Carcinoma (THCA) | ADAR1 | miR-200b/ZEB1 | [129] |
| Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | ADAR2 | Pancreatic β cells | [131] [133] [132] |
| Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) | ADAR1 | let-7 miRNA | [135] [134] [127] [136] [137] [110] |
| Dyspigmentation Symmetrical Hereditary (DSH) | ADAR1 | N/A | [140] [144] |
Figure 2.

Diagram of the relationship between dsRNA A-to-I editing and multiple diseases.
3.1. Neurological & neurodegenerative symptoms
3.1.1. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Neurodegenerative diseases are triggered by neuronal necrosis. The elevation in intercellular glutamate concentration leads to the generation of toxic substances in the microenvironment of neurons, thereby inducing neuronal degeneration, senescence, and demise. Glutamate excitotoxicity is closely associated with the onset and progression of numerous neurodegenerative disorders and represents one of the most significant mechanisms contributing to nerve cell death. ALS is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by selective motor neuron necrosis, although most cases occur sporadically [74]. Elevated levels of glutamate have been observed in sporadic ALS cases, suggesting that activation of glutamate-gated ion channels may result in an excessive influx of Ca2+ and subsequent neuronal death [75]. The pathogenic role played by dysfunction in dsRNA A-to-I editing at the GluA2 Q/R site due to ADAR2 knockdown has been extensively elucidated in sporadic ALS [76,77]. Kawahara et al. employed a laser micro-cutter to isolate individual motor neurons affected by ALS, and the editing efficiency was determined by assessing the variations in digestion patterns of GluA2 mRNA products nested within the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Ultimately, they observed that sporadic ALS patients exhibited fewer A-to-I editing sites in the dsRNA domain sequence encoded by GluA2 compared to healthy volunteers [77]. It is worth noting that GluA2 undergoes A-to-I editing at the Q/R site [57,78], which plays a crucial role in determining the Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors. ADAR2 is responsible for editing all GluA2 expressed in neurons at this specific site [76]. Furthermore, motor neurons with reduced levels of edited receptors experience enhanced Ca2+ influx, potentially leading to significant necrosis [16]. Consequently, reactivating ADAR2 through AMPA receptors or inhibiting excessive Ca2+ influx could serve as promising therapeutic strategies for repairing degenerating motor neurons in sporadic ALS patients [79,80].
3.1.2. Epilepsy
Epilepsy, being one of the most prevalent neurological and neurodegenerative disorders characterized by unexplained recurrent seizures [81], is associated with long-term exposure to non-lethal levels of elevated calcium concentrations in neurons, leading to plastic changes and ultimately resulting in the development of epilepsy. The AMPA glutamate receptor plays a crucial role in rapid excitatory nerve transmission [82,83]. Therefore, scientists believe that insufficient editing at the GluA2Q/R site leads to increased Ca2+ concentrations, which are responsible for epilepsy. Epilepsy triggers a significant elevation in intracellular Ca2+ levels, while impairment of editing at dsRNA sequence sites encoded by GluA2Q/R causes substantial enhancement of Ca2+ permeability [59]. Thus, there is a correlation between defects in A-to-I editing at GluA2Q/R encoded dsRNA sites mediated by ADAR2 and susceptibility to epilepsy [59,84]. This implies that reduced GluA2Q/R editing sites mediated by ADAR2 contribute to the onset of epilepsy.
3.1.3. Bilateral striatal necrosis (BSN)
BSN is an inherited dystonic movement disorder associated with cerebral oedema. ADAR1 mutants, such as Pro193Ala, Ile872Thr, and Gly1007Arg, have been identified in patients with confirmed AGS exhibiting the BSN phenotype [85]. These mutants are transmitted in both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive manners, ultimately resulting in loss-of-function of ADAR1 [85]. Moreover, ADAR1-mutated BSNs are implicated in interferon signaling [85]. Spastic paraplegia is a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder linked to ADAR1 mutants and characterized by axonal degeneration and lower limb spasms [86]. The G1007R and P193A mutants of ADAR1 drive upregulation of interferon in BSN as well as manifestation of spastic paraplegia [87]. ADAR1 mutants interfere with dsRNA A-to-I editing at glutamate receptor Q/R sites in the brain, leading to increased Ca2+ influx into neurons [88]. This suggests that ADAR1 May serve as a predisposing factor for genetic degenerative dystonia.
3.1.4. Depression and schizophrenia
Depression is an affective mental disorder characterized by symptoms such as sadness, low self-esteem, inattention, and other related manifestations. The aetiology of behavioral and mental disorders fundamentally involves 5-serotonin signal transduction [89]. In contrast to control subjects, individuals diagnosed with severe depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder did not show any changes in the transcriptional editing efficiencies of 5-HT2CR in the brain frontal cortex [90–92]. Discrepancies exist regarding the editing changes of 5-HT2CR mRNA in suicide victims. Under these conditions, scientists suggest that dsRNA A-to-I editing acts as a homoeostatic mechanism that mitigates the impact of various environmental and genetic factors on neuronal functions [93]. Increasing the number of 5-HT2CR editors may contribute to the treatment of mental illness. Furthermore, rhythm plays a significant role in all aspects of physiology including neural activity. The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing mediated by ADAR2 affects circadian rhythms and regulates rhythmic oscillation levels of mRNA expression. Additionally, ADAR2-deficient mice exhibit complete loss of RNA editing rhythm, short-cycle free running behaviour, and gene expression oscillation [94]. This further indicates that dsRNA A-to-I editing plays a crucial role in regulating circadian rhythms.
3.2. Autoimmune disorders
3.2.1. AGS
Immune diseases arise from dysregulation of immune responses that disrupt the body’s ability to defend against pathogens. AGS is an autosomal dominant autoimmune disorder characterized by cerebral atrophy, leukodystrophy, intracranial calcifications, and chronic cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis. ADAR1 mutants contribute to the development of AGS by activating immunoreactivity towards dsRNA or impairing Inosine production following IFN-induced intrinsic function inhibition [73]. Nine identified ADAR1 mutants have been associated with AGS [73,95], namely p. Pro193, Ala.Arg892His, p. Ala870Thr, p. Asp1113His, p. Gly1007Arg, p. Tyr1112Phe, p. Lys999Asn, p. Ile872Thr, and p. Lys359Argfs. Notably, G1007R mutation within the deaminase domain results in a complete loss of enzyme activity in ADAR1 [73]. Furthermore, the p193A missense mutation occurs outside of the deaminase domain. Mutagenesis in the first Z-DNA binding domain of ADAR1 p150’s N-terminal reduces enzyme activity, resulting in an overall discharge of IFN in AGS patients [96]. This suggests that the reduced RNA-editing activity of ADAR1 p150 is likely one reason for AGS pathogenesis. Therefore, targeting corresponding ADAR1 mutation sites may be an effective treatment strategy for Ai-cardi-Goutières syndrome. Additionally, ADAR1-specific knockout mice exhibit embryonic lethality with a type I IFN signature resembling AGS symptoms [38,97], which can be rescued by simultaneous knockdown of the Ifih1 gene encoding MDA5 [17,38,98]. E861A mutant mice are also embryonic lethal and deleting MDA5/MAVS can rescue this lethality while increasing IFN-stimulated gene expression [38,96,98]. All these findings suggest that pathogenesis caused by ADAR1 mutants is most likely mediated through an activated MDA5-sensing pathway and therefore makes ADAR1 a key target for treating AGS.
3.2.2. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
The RNA-sequencing dataset analysis reveals a significant upregulation trend of total ADAR1 in the synovium of patients with either early or established RA, particularly the pro-inflammatory isoform ADAR1p150 [99]. The expression of ADAR1p150 and the rates of dsRNA A-to-I editing in repetitive Alu elements are increased in circulating mononuclear cells from patients with active RA. Following 12 weeks of antirheumatic treatment, significant reductions in ADAR1p150 expression and dsRNA A-to-I editing rates are observed in patients who exhibit a favourable clinical response [99]. The correlation between increased dsRNA A-to-I editing and the expression of pro-inflammatory genes implies their potential involvement in chronic inflammation [100]. Although the aberrant expression of ADAR1 May be associated with the pathogenesis of RA, further investigation is still required to elucidate the specific underlying mechanisms.
3.2.3. SLE
The pathogenesis of SLE, a chronic autoimmune disease, is characterized by dysfunctions in the immune effectors of B-lymphocytes and T-lymphocytes [99]. The up-regulation of ADAR1, an interferon-inducible enzyme, in SLE T cells has been discovered [99,101]. ADAR2 selectively targets PDE8A1 as its substrate. Up-regulation of ADAR1 May suppress the function of ADAR2, leading to hypo-editing in the PDE8A1 gene transcriptomes of SLE T cells [102]. The modifications in editing multiple dsRNA sequences contribute to the modulation of gene regulation and immune function in SLE, playing a pivotal role in the initiation and propagation of SLE pathogenesis. Therefore, further investigations are warranted to elucidate the still ambiguous pathogenesis of SLE.
3.2.4. Viral infections
ADAR1-mediated dsRNA A-to-I editing plays a crucial role in various viral infections. For instance, ADAR1 enhances the replication of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) by inhibiting the kinase activity of PKR and suppressing eIF-2α phosphorylation, thereby facilitating VSV infection [103,104]. Additionally, knockdown or knockout of ADAR1 leads to a reduction in Zika virus(ZIKV) transcription, translation, and titres. This is attributed to the ability of ADAR1 to restore ZIKV replication by suppressing interferon production and PKR activation [105]. Recent RNA-seq data have been utilized to map RNA-editing sites in the SARS-CoV-2 genome [44]. ADAR signatures have been observed in 91 editing events within viral SARS-CoV-2 dsRNA intermediates. Furthermore, infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces type I and III IFNs in lung cancer cell lines, resulting in the inhibition of viral ssRNA replication but also triggering a cytokine storm that further exacerbates severe COVID-19. This dependence on the MDA5/MAVS/IRF3 axis for IFN induction has been identified as a major cellular sensor of SARSCoV-2 [43]. Additionally, knockdown or knockout of ADAR1 leads to a reduction in ZIKV transcription, translation, and titres. This is attributed to the ability of ADAR1 to restore ZIKV replication by suppressing interferon production and PKR activation.
3.3. Tumorigenicity
3.3.1. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
HCC exhibits the highest mortality rate among all subtypes of carcinomas worldwide. In contrast to other subtypes, such tumor demonstrates a profound disruption that results in an imbalance in dsRNA A-to-I editing. ADAR1 and ADAR2 modulate this imbalance through their differential expression in HCC compared to non-tumour liver tissues. Approximately 70% of cases exhibit overexpression of both ADAR1 p110 and p150, while half of the cases display downregulation of ADAR2 [106]. The differential expression of ADAR1 and ADAR2 in HCC patients is clinically indicative of a poor prognosis, as their overexpression and downregulation in tumours respectively are associated with adverse outcomes [106]. The differentially expressed ADAR1 and ADAR2 also induce specific editing activities, such as overexpression of AZINI and reduced editing of COPA, which are associated with its pathogenesis of [106,107]. The regulation of COPA editing by ADAR2 inhibits the development of HCC [108]. ADAR1 plays a pivotal role in the editing of AZIN1 [69]. The induction of tumorigenesis and enhancement of invasive capability by AZIN1 are positively correlated with the frequency of ADAR1-mediated editing. AZIN1 editing has been observed in HCC tumorigenesis, resulting in amino acid substitution from Ser to Gly. This recoding event can significantly impact protein function, thereby contributing to the tumor onset and development [69]. Additionally, research has demonstrated an escalation in the frequency of AZIN1 editing throughout the progression of diseases, ranging from cirrhosis and primary liver cancer to advanced carcinoma with recurrence and metastasis [69,109]. Given the oncogenic role played by AZIN1, it represents a promising target for future therapeutic interventions against HCC. Moreover, the upregulation of ADAR1 in HCC patients is associated with an increased risk of liver cirrhosis, postoperative recurrence, and unfavourable prognosis [110]. Therefore, the inhibition of ADAR1 or activation of ADAR2 may potentially mitigate the risk of postoperative recurrence in HCC.
3.3.2. Astrocytoma
Astrocytoma refers to a type of tumour formed by astrocytes, while Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a grade IV astrocytoma, is the most aggressive malignant tumour with an average survival time of 18 months [111]. The imbalance of ADAR2 plays a pivotal role in the development of cancer. Overexpression of ADAR2 in astrocytoma cell lines leads to reduced cell proliferation and decreased tumour volumes and weights in xenografting nude mice models [62]. The analysis of GBM tissue samples reveals a deficiency in editing at the GluA2Q/R site compared to the control [112]. Ozawa et al. elucidated the causal relationship between inadequate Q/R site editing and malignant astrocytoma tumours, subsequently discovering that GBM predominantly expresses Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptor subunits (GluA2 and GluA4), confirming that alterations in Ca2+ influx play a pivotal role in tumour growth. Additionally, transection of GBM cells with an edited version of GluA2 (GluA2R) inhibits cell migration and even induces apoptosis. In contrast, an unedited version of GluA2 (GluA2Q) enhances cellular malignant features [113]. The activation of the AMPA-Akt phosphorylation axis simultaneously promotes carcinoma proliferation by facilitating an excessive influx of Ca2+ [114]. The reduction of dsRNA editing levels at the GluA2Q/R site overall significantly enhances astrocytoma progression.
3.3.3. BC
The incidence of BC in women is characterized by a high mortality rate, making it the most malignant tumour among females and accounting for 7–10% of all types of malignant tumours in humans [115]. Among the subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) stands out as the most aggressive due to its lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and protooncogene HER-2. The potential therapeutic target for TNBC is ADAR1, which plays a role in mediating the dsRNA A-to-I editing process and influencing its target level in BC [116–119]. The enzyme Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) plays a pivotal role in the metabolic pathway of folate and serves as a prime target for methotrexate. Elevated expression of DHFR confers resistance to methotrexate treatment in tumours. Suppression of ADAR1 leads to reduced RNA editing on DHFR, resulting in significant decreases in both DHFR mRNA and protein levels [119,120]. The results suggest that ADAR1 enhances the expression of DHFR. Moreover, BC tissues exhibit higher levels of ADAR1 expression and dsRNA A-to-I editing rate within the 3’-UTR regions of DHFR compared to adjacent normal tissues [119]. Recent studies have indicated that elevated expression of ADAR1 in TNBC may lead to poor prognosis when accompanied by increased dsRNA A-to-I editing rates [121,122]. The expression of ADAR1 is notably high in all subtypes of BC, thus the knockdown of ADAR1 can effectively impede cell growth and tumorigenesis [123]. The collective findings indicate that therapeutic inhibitors directed towards ADAR1 present a promising approach for mitigating TNBC.
3.3.4. PC
PC is a prevalent malignancy in the human digestive system, characterized by its high degree of malignancy. The expression of ADAR1 is upregulated during the onset and progression of PC, where it serves as a crucial biomarker for diagnosis and development. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a classical subtype of PC. CircNEIL3, a circular RNA molecule, functions as an oncogene in PDAC through the circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1 axis, with ADAR1 being indirectly regulated by circNEIL3 as a downstream target of miR-432-5p. This regulatory loop involving circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1 governs the proliferation and metastasis of PDAC via downstream GLI signaling or cell cycle and EMT pathway [124]. This implies that ADAR1 could serve as a therapeutic target for PC. Inhibition of ADAR1 to block the circNEIL3/miR-432-5p/ADAR1 pathway may have potential clinical implications in intervening with PC treatment.
3.3.5. Gastric cancer (GC)
The incidence and fatality of GC are globally significant, with it ranking third in terms of mortality rate [72]. The catalytic deaminase domains of ADAR1 and ADAR2 confer distinct roles as oncogenes and tumour suppressors, respectively [72]. The expression of ADAR1 is significantly upregulated in primary GC, whereas ADAR2 exhibits significant downregulation [125]. The decrease in editing activity is correlated with the functional impairment of the ADAR2 enzyme. In GC, deletion of the ADAR2 gene results in a reduction in ADAR2 expression [72]. The high expression of ADAR1 in GC cells, as demonstrated by in vitro tumorigenicity assays, suggests that its overexpression may be a specific characteristic contributing to the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Additionally, the PODXL gene encodes a protein that undergoes an amino acid substitution from His to Arg at codon 241. The specific regulation of this protein by ADAR2 weakens the oncogenic potential of unedited PODXL [72]. The inhibition of ADAR1 or activation of ADAR2 could be potential therapeutic strategies for GC treatment.
3.3.6. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
The predominant histological form of oesophageal cancer is ESCC, characterized by a heterogeneous tumour exhibiting a complex array of genetic and epigenetic alterations [126]. ADAR1 is upregulated in primary ESCC because of gene amplification, and patients with overexpression of ADAR1 exhibit a poor prognosis. In vitro and in vivo assays confirm the oncogenic role of ADAR1 during the initiation and progression of ESCC. Moreover, ESCC patients with elevated levels of ADAR1 experience shorter survival periods compared to other tumour phenotypes. Therefore, it can be inferred that the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing mediated by ADAR1 May further exacerbate the disease [126]. Conversely, the overexpression of ADAR2 in ESCC results in a decrease in cellular proliferation and an increase in apoptotic events. Moreover, xenografting nude mouse models exhibit significant reductions in tumour volumes and weights compared to their wild-type counterparts [127]. In essence, employing specific agents to facilitate ADAR2-mediated dsRNA A-to-I editing could serve as an efficacious therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ESCC.
3.3.7. Cervical carcinoma (CC)
CC is a prevalent malignancy among females, particularly impacting the health of women in developing countries. dsRNA-editing ADAR1 has been implicated in the occurrence and progression of CC. Firstly, CC exhibits high expression levels of ADAR1 [65]. The expression of CC gradually intensifies as the stages progress [65]. The findings suggest that increased expression of ADAR1 May contribute to the development of CC. Interestingly, ADAR1 expression is not only associated with processes related to metastasis, such as invasion and migration, but also closely linked to parametrial invasion, which serves as a prognostic factor [65]. The investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms necessitates further studies.
3.3.8. Thyroid carcinoma (THCA)
THCA is the predominant type of thyroid malignancy, ranking ninth globally in terms of cancer incidence rates [128]. Numerous A-to-I editing sites have been identified in the untranslated dsRNA of THCA. The expression of ADAR1 and subsequent dsRNA A-to-I editing modulate the aggressiveness of THCA cells, thereby impacting their proliferation, invasion, migration, three-dimensional (3D) growth in vitro, as well as tumour growth in vivo [129]. The overediting of the tumour suppressor miR-200b in thyroid tumours is attributed to dsRNA A-to-I editing, which impairs its inhibitory effect on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker ZEB1. Restricting ADAR1 activity effectively curbs the proliferation, invasion, and migration capabilities of THCA [129]. The researchers have investigated that pharmacological inhibition targeting A-to-I editing in THCA cells leads to a reduction in aggressiveness in vitro [129]. The findings suggest that elevated levels of ADAR1 expression have a carcinogenic impact on THCA. In general, A-to-I editing sites could potentially serve as therapeutic targets for THCA. Targeted interventions directed at these specific sites would be significant in mitigating such tumours.
The expression of ADAR1 is observed to be upregulated across a range of cancers, including HCC, BC, PC, THCA, and GC. Conversely, there is a consistent downregulation of ADAR2 levels within these malignancies. Overall, depending on the tumour type and stage, ADARs exhibit diverse effects by influencing dsRNA editing processes that subsequently play distinct roles in carcinogenesis. Gaining insights into how ADARs contribute to the initiation and progression of human tumorigenesis could potentially lead to innovative approaches for developing anti-cancer therapies.
3.4. Metabolic diseases
3.4.1. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM)
The occurrence of metabolic diseases is attributed to disruptions in metabolic processes or excessive metabolic activities, which are indicative of systemic disorders affecting the human brain. T2DM is a metabolic disorder characterized by aberrant insulin secretion and impaired intracellular reuptake, often accompanied by hyperglycaemia and persistently elevated plasma glucose levels [130]. The glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of T2DM. Researchers have demonstrated that glucose stimulation upregulates the expression of ADAR2 in pancreatic β-cells via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 pathway [131,132]. Furthermore, accumulating evidence suggests that the downregulation of ADAR2 significantly compromises insulin secretion, thereby highlighting its crucial role in maintaining optimal pancreatic β-cell function [133]. However, the precise targets of ADAR2 in the context of insulin secretion remain poorly elucidated, necessitating further investigation into its role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion beyond pancreatic β-cells.
3.4.2. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
The clonal malignant disease known as CML arises from aberrant differentiations of haematopoietic stem cells. The co-expression of the JAK-STAT pathway and BCR-ABL1 synergistically activates interferon signal transduction, resulting in elevated levels of ADAR1 in CML [134,135] (Figure 3). Additionally, there is an increased expression of inflammation-associated pathways and ADAR1p150 subtypes in it as well[135]. The presence of an increased number of dsRNA A-to-I editors is observed in advanced leukaemia [136]. A study on CML has demonstrated that ADAR1 editing results in a reduction of let-7 miRNA family members, which are known for their tumour-suppressive role [110,134,137–139]. By assessing the re-inoculation capacity in BALB/c mice, it was observed that ADAR1 exerts its influence on the overall let-7 levels exclusively through activation of leukaemic stem cell self-renewal [134]. Furthermore, it has been confirmed that let-7d, a member of the let-7 family, possesses multiple A-to-I editing sites within its encoded dsRNA sequence; one specific site significantly impacts its maturation efficiency [134]. The findings suggest that ADAR1 exerts its influence on the carcinogenesis phenotype by impeding the maturation processes of specific miRNAs.
Figure 3.

The diagram illustrates the immune exchange pathway mediated by ADAR1, a dsRNA A-to-I editing transformation modulating enzyme. In blast crisis CML, progenitors exhibit elevated levels of IFNγR1 and IL-3 Rα that can be activated by the JAK2 signalling pathway. Furthermore, the JAK2/STAT signalling pathway enhances ADAR1-mediated dsRNA editing. Amplification of BCR-ABL1 serves as a biomarker for blast crisis transformation simulating JAK2 activation, promoting self-renewal of progenitors through upregulation of LIN28B expression while impairing let-7 miRNA biogenesis. There exists a mechanistic relationship between oncogenic signalling pathways driven by inflammatory cytokines and malignant reprogramming of progenitors driven by dsRNA editing.
3.4.3. Dyspigmentation symmetrical hereditary (DSH)
The DSH is an uncommon autosomal dominant skin disorder characterized by hyperpigmentation, primarily affecting the anterior and posterior aspects of the limbs during infancy or early childhood [140]. Mutations in ADAR1 can impair the development of DSH. The initiation and progression of DSH are linked to heterozygous ADAR mutants. Gene mutations occurring in the deaminase domain of ADAR1 contribute to the pathogenesis of DSH in humans. More than 130 DSH-related mutants have been identified within the gene sequence of ADAR1, leading to disruption of type I interferon homoeostasis and subsequent manifestation of DSH [141]. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that ADAR1 p150 plays a pivotal role in determining susceptibility to DSH, with haploinsufficiency serving as the genetic mechanism underlying this condition [142]. In zebrafish experiments, knockdown of ADAR1 resulted in aberrant migration of melanocytes and disrupted melanogenesis observed in skin lesions from patients with DSH [143]. Therefore, some researchers propose that the failure of RNA editing mediated by ADAR1 mutations hinders melanoblast differentiation, resulting in an uneven distribution of melanin and subsequent development of DSH skin lesions [144]. However, further research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis underlying DSH. Moreover, it should be noted that both AGS and DSH can coexist concurrently. Heterozygous mutations in ADAR1 have been reported to cause isolated instances of DSH; however, homozygous or compound mutations lead to a combined phenotype characterized by AGS features along with distinctive traits associated with DSH [145]. The investigation of ADAR1 mutations will contribute significantly to the elucidation of the underlying mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of DSH.
Taken collectively, the dsRNA A-to-I editing facilitated by ADAR enzymes can exert a profound influence on the development and progression of metabolic disorders. For instance, during the initiation of CML, an observed upregulation of ADAR1 May potentially exacerbate the disease. Moreover, mutagenesis in ADAR1 has been discovered to induce symmetrical hereditary dyspigmentation. In contrast, expression of ADAR2 is associated with T2DM. To summarize, interference with the expression of distinct ADAR enzymes can modulate this process and subsequently modify pathogenesis. These investigations have raised the possibility that such process could serve as disease biomarkers and underscore ADAR family enzymes as potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
4. Discussion and prospects
Through literature mining, we have discovered that ADAR enzyme-mediated dsRNA A-to-I editing is implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases. During tumorigenesis, ADAR1 exhibits high expression and functions as an oncogene, whereas ADAR2 acts as a tumour suppressor [34,146]. Additionally, we have observed that dsRNA A-to-I editing can interact with RNA modifications such as m6A and affect the expression of genes controlled by these modifications [23–25]. The impairment of disease progression has been reported in relation to various sites involved in this editing process, including the GluA2 Q/R site [59,60]. Although numerous functional dsRNA editing sites have been identified, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Modulating the expressions of ADAR family members to regulate the editing process could potentially serve as a gene therapy strategy for various diseases. However, effectively inhibiting ADAR1 expression or enhancing ADAR2 expression without adversely affecting other genes poses a challenge that necessitates further substantiation.
The expression of ADAR family enzymes is influenced by certain chemicals or small molecular inhibitors, which also intervene in the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing (Table 3). Consequently, these substances exert a regulatory effect on pathogenesis related to dsRNA editing or induced by it. For example, antidepressants have been found to enhance the editing activity in the encoded domain dsRNA sequences of 5-HT2C and GluA2 receptors [147]. The administration of compounds such as paroxetine and imipramine results in the upregulation of ADAR2 expression, thereby enhancing GluA2 editing ability at the Q/R site [92,148]. Reversely, cocaine decreases the expression of ADAR2 while diminishing its editing activity [149]. These pieces of evidence collectively suggest that natural herbs or chemical components may potentially play therapeutic roles in addressing neurological and neurodegenerative symptoms associated with dsRNA editing. Interestingly, Rebecsinib, a selective small-molecule inhibitor capable of eliminating ADAR1 splicing-mediated activations, can inhibit ADAR1p150 without causing significant adverse effects. This inhibition not only eradicates leukaemia stem cells but also preserves normal haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [150]. Curaxin CBL0137, another inhibitor, directly triggers Z-DNA formation and effectively activates ZBP1 while inhibiting ADAR1. By suppressing endogenous Z-RNA and ZBP1-mediated necroptosis, ADAR1 serves as an emerging determinant of tumour immunogenicity that is concealed by its presence. Therefore, therapeutically inducing ZBP1-induced necroptosis provides a readily translatable pathway for rekindling immunoreactivity in ICB-resistant human tumorigenesis [42].
Table 3.
Intervention and activation of dsRNA A-to-I editing process.
| Compound or Monomer Composition | ADAR | References |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | ADAR2 | [149] |
| Antidepressants | ADAR2 | [148] |
| Aflatoxin B1 | ADAR | [151] |
| Benzo (a) Pyrene (bap-a) | ADAR2 | [152] [153] |
| Hexavalent Chromium Ion (Potassium Chromate (VI)) | ADAR2 | [154] |
| Tetrachlorodibenzo Dioxin (TCDD) | ADAR2 | [155] |
| Acrylamide | ADAR3 | [156] |
| 8-Azaadenosine | ADAR1 | [129] [134] |
In conclusion, this review offers a comprehensive overview of the dsRNA A-to-I editing process implicated in pathogenesis and emphasizes the significance of small molecular inhibitors, encompassing chemicals and active components that activate ADAR family enzymes. Furthermore, it explores the regulation of dsRNA A-to-I editing by active components. Given the implication of such editing sites in multiple diseases, it is imperative to investigate inhibitors that target specific editing sites to potentially modify pathogenesis and provide valuable insights for personalized remedies and precision medicine.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (82104494, Z.Z.Y.), National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (U20A20405, X.B.S.), as well as Shanghai Pujiang Program (No.23PJ1412300, Z.Z.Y.).
Funding Statement
The work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [No.82104494]; National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [No.U20A20405]; Shanghai Pujiang Program [No.23PJ1412300].
Highlights
The ADAR family enzymes catalyzed the process of the dsRNA A-to-I editing, which is correlative to the pathogeneses such as tumorigenicity, autoimmune disorders, neurological and neurodegenerative symptoms as well as metabolic diseases.
The ADARs family enzymes are targeted by certain small molecule inhibitors, which then carry out modulation activities involved in the process of dsRNA A-to-I editing or induced pathogeneses.
The process of dsRNA A-to-I editing exerts an influence on RNA modifications, such as m6A, m5C and so on, thereby mutually impairing the pathogeneses.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Abbreviations
ADAR, adenosine deaminases ; A-to-I, Adenosine-to-Inosine; AGS, Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome; ALS, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; BLCAP, Bladder cancer-associated protein; BC, Breast carcinoma; BSN, Bilateral striatal necrosis; CML, chronic myeloid leukaemia; CC, Cervical carcinoma; CDC14B, cell division cycle 14B; DHFR, Dihydrofolate reductase; DSH, Dyspigmentation symmetrical hereditary; dsRNA, double-stranded RNA; ERE, endogenous retroviral elements; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ER, estrogen receptor; eIF2α, eukaryotic initiation factor 2α; Gly, Glycine; GC, gastric cancer; GBM, Glioblastoma multiforme; GluA2, Glutamate receptor 2; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN, interferon; ICB, Immune Checkpoint Blockade; m6A,N6-adenosine methylation, m5C, cytosine hydroxylation; m1A,N1-adenosine methylation; m7G,N7-methylguanosine methylation; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; PC, Pancreatic cancer; PDAC, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, Systemic lupus erythematosus; ssRNA, single-stranded RNA; Ser, Serine; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes; TNBC, triple-negative breast carcinoma; THCA, Thyroid carcinoma; Tetrachlorodibenzo Dioxin (TCDD); VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; ZIKV, Zika virus; 5-HT, serotonin receptor; 5-HT2CR, The 5-HT2C receptor.
Author contributions
Wanqing Liu and Yufan Wu: Writing original draft preparation; Zizhao Yang, Tong Zhang, Xiaobo Sun, and Dean Guo: providing the editing and writing assistance and suggestions; Zizhao Yang and Dean Guo: approving the final version for publication. All the authors have made contributions to both the manuscript’s initiation and submission.
Data availability statement
As a review paper, this manuscript does not contain the source or experimental data, so this statement is to announce that our manuscript is irrelevant to any potential source or experimental data conflicts or issues.
References
- [1].Gan WL, Ng L, Ng BYL, et al. Recent advances in adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in cancer. Cancer treatment and research. 2023;190:143–179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-45654-1_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Matthews MM, Thomas JM, Zheng Y, et al. Structures of human ADAR2 bound to dsRNA reveal base-flipping mechanism and basis for site selectivity. Nat Struct & Mol Biol. 2016;23(5):426–433. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Wulff BE, Nishikura K.. Substitutional A-to-I RNA editing. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA. 2010;1(1):90–101. doi: 10.1002/wrna.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Booth BJ, Nourreddine S, Katrekar D, et al. RNA editing: expanding the potential of RNA therapeutics. Mol Ther. 2023;31(6):1533–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Mendez Ruiz S, Chalk AM, Goradia A, et al. Over-expression of ADAR1 in mice does not initiate or accelerate cancer formation in vivo. NAR Cancer. 2023;5(2):zcad023. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcad023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Feng C, Cao X, Du Y, et al. Uncovering cis-regulatory elements important for A-to-I RNA editing in fusarium graminearum. mBio. 2022;13(5):e0187222. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01872-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Duan Y, Dou S, Porath HT, et al. A-to-I RNA editing in honeybees shows signals of adaptation and convergent evolution. iScience. 2021;24(1):101983. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Heraud-Farlow JE, Walkley CR. What do editors do? Understanding the physiological functions of A-to-I RNA editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNAs. Open Biol. 2020;10(7):200085. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Yang W, Chendrimada TP, Wang Q, et al. Modulation of microRNA processing and expression through RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Nat Struct & Mol Biol. 2006;13(1):13–21. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Ivanov A, Memczak S, Wyler E, et al. Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Liao Y, Jung SH, Kim T. A-to-I RNA editing as a tuner of noncoding RNAs in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;494:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Gerber A, O’Connell MA, Keller W. Two forms of human double-stranded rna-specific editase 1 (hRED1) generated by the insertion of an Alu cassette. RNA (New Y, NY). 1997;3(5):453–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Wang H, Chen S, Wei J, et al. A-to-I RNA editing in cancer: from evaluating the editing level to exploring the editing effects. Front Oncol. 2020;10:632187. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.632187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Wang C, Zou J, Ma X, et al. Mechanisms and implications of adar-mediated RNA editing in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017;411:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.09.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Wang Q, Miyakoda M, Yang W, et al. Stress-induced apoptosis associated with null mutation of ADAR1 RNA editing deaminase gene. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(6):4952–4961. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310162200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Higuchi M, Maas S, Single FN, et al. Point mutation in an AMPA receptor gene rescues lethality in mice deficient in the rna-editing enzyme ADAR2. Nature. 2000;406(6791):78–81. doi: 10.1038/35017558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Costa Cruz PH, Kato Y, Nakahama T, et al. A comparative analysis of ADAR mutant mice reveals site-specific regulation of RNA editing. RNA (New Y, NY). 2020;26(4):454–469. doi: 10.1261/rna.072728.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Mladenova D, Barry G, Konen LM, et al. Adar3 is involved in learning and memory in mice. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:243. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].George CX, Samuel CE. Human RNA-specific adenosine deaminase ADAR1 transcripts possess alternative exon 1 structures that initiate from different promoters, one constitutively active and the other interferon inducible. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(8): 4621–4626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].George CX, John L, Samuel CE. An RNA Editor, Adenosine Deaminase Acting on Double-Stranded RNA (ADAR1). J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2014;34(6):437–446. doi: 10.1089/jir.2014.0001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220). doi: 10.1126/science.1260419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Roundtree IA, Evans ME, Pan T, et al. Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell. 2017;169(7):1187–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Liu J, Eckert MA, Harada BT, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation regulates AKT activity to promote the proliferation and tumorigenicity of endometrial cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1074–1083. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0174-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Yang S, Wei J, Cui YH, et al. m(6)A mRNA demethylase FTO regulates melanoma tumorigenicity and response to anti-PD-1 blockade. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2782. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10669-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Li Y, Wang NX, Yin C, et al. RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 regulates METTL3 in an editing dependent manner to promote breast cancer progression via METTL3/ARHGAP5/YTHDF1 axis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17). doi: 10.3390/ijms23179656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Nishikura K. A-to-I editing of coding and non-coding RNAs by ADARs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(2):83–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Higuchi M, Single FN, Köhler M, et al. RNA editing of AMPA receptor subunit GluR-b: a base-paired intron-exon structure determines position and efficiency. Cell. 1993;75(7):1361–1370. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90622-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Yang W, Wang Q, Howell KL, et al. ADAR1 RNA deaminase limits short interfering RNA efficacy in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(5):3946–3953. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407876200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Su AA, Randau L. A-to-I and C-to-U editing within transfer RNAs. Biochem Biokhimiia. 2011;76(8):932–937. doi: 10.1134/s0006297911080098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Torres AG, Piñeyro D, Filonava L, et al. A-to-I editing on tRnas: biochemical, biological and evolutionary implications. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(23):4279–4286. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Noda Y, Okada S, Suzuki T. Regulation of A-to-I RNA editing and stop codon recoding to control selenoprotein expression during skeletal myogenesis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2503. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30181-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Huang W, Sun YM, Pan Q, et al. The snoRNA-like lncRNA LNC-SNO49AB drives leukemia by activating the rna-editing enzyme ADAR1. Cell discovery. 2022;8(1):117. doi: 10.1038/s41421-022-00460-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Yang Y, Zhou X, Jin Y. Adar-mediated RNA editing in non-coding RNA sequences. Sci China Life Sci. 2013;56(10):944–952. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4546-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Fritzell K, Xu LD, Lagergren J, et al. ADARs and editing: the role of A-to-I RNA modification in cancer progression. Semin Cell & Dev Biol. 2018;79:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].van der Kwast R, van Ingen E, Parma L, et al. Adenosine-to-inosine editing of MicroRNA-487b alters target gene selection after ischemia and promotes neovascularization. Circ Res. 2018;122(3):444–456. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.117.312345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Shoshan E, Mobley AK, Braeuer RR, et al. Reduced adenosine-to-inosine miR-455-5p editing promotes melanoma growth and metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(3):311–321. doi: 10.1038/ncb3110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Gannon HS, Zou T, Kiessling MK, et al. Identification of ADAR1 adenosine deaminase dependency in a subset of cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07824-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Liddicoat BJ, Piskol R, Chalk AM, et al. RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Sci (New Y, NY). 2015;349(6252):1115–1120. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Jha BK, Polyakova I, Kessler P, et al. Inhibition of RNase L and RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) by sunitinib impairs antiviral innate immunity. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(30):26319–26326. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.253443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].de Reuver R, Verdonck S, Dierick E, et al. ADAR1 prevents autoinflammation by suppressing spontaneous ZBP1 activation. Nature. 2022;607(7920):784–789. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04974-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Hartner JC, Walkley CR, Lu J, et al. ADAR1 is essential for the maintenance of hematopoiesis and suppression of interferon signaling. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(1):109–115. doi: 10.1038/ni.1680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Zhang T, Yin C, Fedorov A, et al. ADAR1 masks the cancer immunotherapeutic promise of ZBP1-driven necroptosis. Nature. 2022;606(7914):594–602. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04753-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Datta R, Adamska JZ, Bhate A, et al. A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR and its therapeutic applications: from viral infections to cancer immunotherapy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2024;2023(1):e1817. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Song Y, He X, Yang W, et al. Virus-specific editing identification approach reveals the landscape of A-to-I editing and its impacts on SARS-CoV-2 characteristics and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(5):2509–2521. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Del Toro Duany Y, Wu B, Hur S. MDA5-filament, dynamics and disease. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;12:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.01.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Duic I, Tadakuma H, Harada Y, et al. Viral RNA recognition by LGP2 and MDA5, and activation of signaling through step-by-step conformational changes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(20):11664–11674. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Kato H, Takeuchi O, Sato S, et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature. 2006;441(7089):101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature04734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Peisley A, Jo MH, Lin C, et al. Kinetic mechanism for viral dsRNA length discrimination by MDA5 filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(49):E3340–3349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208618109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Clerzius G, Gélinas JF, Daher A, et al. ADAR1 interacts with PKR during human immunodeficiency virus infection of lymphocytes and contributes to viral replication. J Virol. 2009;83(19):10119–10128. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02457-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Pfaller CK, George CX, Samuel CE. Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) and viral infections. Annual review of virology. 2021;8(1):239–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-091919-065320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Piontkivska H, Wales-McGrath B, Miyamoto M, et al. ADAR editing in viruses: an evolutionary force to reckon with. Genome Biol Evol. 2021;13(11). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Samuel CE. Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are both antiviral and proviral. Virology. 2011;411(2):180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Samuel CE. Adars: viruses and innate immunity. Current topics in microbiology and immunology. 2012;353:163–195. doi: 10.1007/82_2011_148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Pfaller CK, Donohue RC, Nersisyan S, et al. Extensive editing of cellular and viral double-stranded RNA structures accounts for innate immunity suppression and the proviral activity of ADAR1p150. PLOS Biol. 2018;16(11):e2006577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Wright A, Vissel B. The essential role of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunit RNA editing in the normal and diseased brain. Front Mol Neurosci. 2012;5:34. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, et al. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51(1):7–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Sommer B, Köhler M, Sprengel R, et al. RNA editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels. Cell. 1991;67(1):11–19. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90568-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Seeburg PH, Higuchi M, Sprengel R. RNA editing of brain glutamate receptor channels: mechanism and physiology. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;26(2–3):217–229. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00062-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Brusa R, Zimmermann F, Koh DS, et al. Early-onset epilepsy and postnatal lethality associated with an editing-deficient GluR-B allele in mice. Sci (New Y, NY). 1995;270(5242):1677–1680. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Warhaftig G, Sokolik CM, Khermesh K, et al. RNA editing of the 5-HT2C receptor in the central nucleus of the amygdala is involved in resilience behavior. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):137. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01252-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Yang W, Wang Q, Kanes SJ, et al. Altered RNA editing of serotonin 5-HT2C receptor induced by interferon: implications for depression associated with cytokine therapy. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004;124(1):70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Galeano F, Rossetti C, Tomaselli S, et al. ADAR2-editing activity inhibits glioblastoma growth through the modulation of the CDC14B/Skp2/p21/p27 axis. Oncogene. 2013;32(8):998–1009. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Yao J, Duan L, Fan M, et al. Overexpression of BLCAP induces S phase arrest and apoptosis independent of p53 and nf-kappaB in human tongue carcinoma: BLCAP overexpression induces S phase arrest and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;297(1–2):81–92. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9332-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Fan DG, Zhao F, Ding Y, et al. BLCAP induces apoptosis in human Ewing’s sarcoma cells. Experimental biology and medicine. Exp Biol and Med (Maywood NJ). 2011;236(9):1030–1035. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.010315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Chen Y, Wang H, Lin W, et al. ADAR1 overexpression is associated with cervical cancer progression and angiogenesis. Diagn Pathol. 2017;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13000-017-0600-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Hu X, Wan S, Ou Y, et al. RNA over-editing of BLCAP contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis identified by whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. Cancer Lett. 2015;357(2):510–519. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Villarino AV, Kanno Y, O’Shea JJ. Mechanisms and consequences of jak-stat signaling in the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(4):374–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.3691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Jiang L, Hao Y, Shao C, et al. ADAR1-mediated RNA editing links ganglioside catabolism to glioblastoma stem cell maintenance. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(6). doi: 10.1172/jci143397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Chen L, Li Y, Lin CH, et al. Recoding RNA editing of AZIN1 predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):209–216. doi: 10.1038/nm.3043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Fu L, Qin YR, Ming XY, et al. RNA editing of SLC22A3 drives early tumor invasion and metastasis in familial esophageal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(23):E4631–e4640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703178114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Sun Y, Fan J, Wang B, et al. The aberrant expression of ADAR1 promotes resistance to BET inhibitors in pancreatic cancer by stabilizing c-myc. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(1):148–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Chan TH, Qamra A, Tan KT, et al. ADAR-Mediated RNA editing predicts progression and prognosis of gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(4):637–650.e610. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Rice GI, Kasher PR, Forte GM, et al. Mutations in ADAR1 cause aicardi-goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature. Nat Genet. 2012;44(11):1243–1248. doi: 10.1038/ng.2414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;362(6415):59–62. doi: 10.1038/362059a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Spreux-Varoquaux O, Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, et al. Glutamate levels in cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a reappraisal using a new HPLC method with coulometric detection in a large cohort of patients. J Neurol Sci. 2002;193(2):73–78. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00661-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Hideyama T, Yamashita T, Aizawa H, et al. Profound downregulation of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR2 in ALS spinal motor neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45(3):1121–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Kawahara Y, Ito K, Sun H, et al. Glutamate receptors: RNA editing and death of motor neurons. Nature. 2004;427(6977):801. doi: 10.1038/427801a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Rosenthal JJ, Seeburg PH. A-to-I RNA editing: effects on proteins key to neural excitability. Neuron. 2012;74(3):432–439. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Akamatsu M, Yamashita T, Hirose N, et al. The AMPA receptor antagonist perampanel robustly rescues amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathology in sporadic ALS model mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28649. doi: 10.1038/srep28649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Yamashita T, Chai HL, Teramoto S, et al. Rescue of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotype in a mouse model by intravenous AAV9-ADAR2 delivery to motor neurons. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(11):1710–1719. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201302935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Meirinho S, Rodrigues M, Fortuna A, et al. Liquid chromatographic methods for determination of the new antiepileptic drugs stiripentol, retigabine, rufinamide and perampanel: a comprehensive and critical review. J Pharm Anal. 2021;11(4):405–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Herguedas B, Kohegyi BK, Dohrke JN, et al. Mechanisms underlying TARP modulation of the GluA1/2-γ8 AMPA receptor. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):734. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28404-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Huganir RL, Nicoll RA. AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years. Neuron. 2013;80(3):704–717. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Chen CX, Cho DS, Wang Q, et al. A third member of the rna-specific adenosine deaminase gene family, ADAR3, contains both single- and double-stranded RNA binding domains. RNA (New Y, NY). 2000;6(5):755–767. doi: 10.1017/s1355838200000170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Livingston JH, Lin JP, Dale RC, et al. A type I interferon signature identifies bilateral striatal necrosis due to mutations in ADAR1. J Med Genet. 2014;51(2):76–82. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-102038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Crow YJ, Zaki MS, Abdel-Hamid MS, et al. Mutations in ADAR1, IFIH1, and RNASEH2B presenting as spastic paraplegia. Neuropediatrics. 2014;45(6):386–393. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Yang Y, Okada S, Sakurai M. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in neurological development and disease. RNA Biol. 2021;18(7):999–1013. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1867797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Tojo K, Sekijima Y, Suzuki T, et al. Dystonia, mental deterioration, and dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria in a family with ADAR1 mutation. Mov Disord. 2006;21(9):1510–1513. doi: 10.1002/mds.21011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Jenck F, Bös M, Wichmann J, et al. The role of 5-HT2C receptors in affective disorders. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 1998;7(10):1587–1599. doi: 10.1517/13543784.7.10.1587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Niswender CM, Herrick-Davis K, Dilley GE, et al. RNA editing of the human serotonin 5-HT2C receptor. alterations in suicide and implications for serotonergic pharmacotherapy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(5):478–491. doi: 10.1016/s0893-133x(00)00223-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Dracheva S, Patel N, Woo DA, et al. Increased serotonin 2C receptor mRNA editing: a possible risk factor for suicide. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(11):1001–1010. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Iwamoto K, Kato T. RNA editing of serotonin 2C receptor in human postmortem brains of major mental disorders. Neurosci Lett. 2003;346(3):169–172. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00608-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Di Narzo AF, Kozlenkov A, Roussos P, et al. A unique gene expression signature associated with serotonin 2C receptor RNA editing in the prefrontal cortex and altered in suicide. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(18):4801–4813. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Terajima H, Yoshitane H, Ozaki H, et al. ADARB1 catalyzes circadian A-to-I editing and regulates RNA rhythm. Nat Genet. 2017;49(1):146–151. doi: 10.1038/ng.3731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Schmelzer L, Smitka M, Wolf C, et al. Variable clinical phenotype in two siblings with Aicardi-Goutières syndrome type 6 and a novel mutation in the ADAR gene. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22(1):186–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Mannion NM, Greenwood SM, Young R, et al. The rna-editing enzyme ADAR1 controls innate immune responses to RNA. Cell Rep. 2014;9(4):1482–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Ward SV, George CX, Welch MJ, et al. RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase is a restriction factor for controlling measles virus replication that also is required for embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(1):331–336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017241108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Pestal K, Funk CC, Snyder JM, et al. Isoforms of RNA-Editing enzyme ADAR1 independently control nucleic acid sensor MDA5-driven autoimmunity and multi-organ development. Immunity. 2015;43(5):933–944. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Laxminarayana D, O’Rourke KS, Maas S, et al. Altered editing in RNA editing adenosine deaminase ADAR2 gene transcripts of systemic lupus erythematosus T lymphocytes. Immunology. 2007;121(3):359–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02582.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Vlachogiannis NI, Gatsiou A, Silvestris DA, et al. Increased adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in rheumatoid arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2020;106:102329. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Crow MK, Wohlgemuth J. Microarray analysis of gene expression in lupus. Arthritis Res & Ther. 2003;5(6):279–287. doi: 10.1186/ar1015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Orlowski RJ, O’Rourke KS, Olorenshaw I, et al. Altered editing in cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 8A1 gene transcripts of systemic lupus erythematosus T lymphocytes. Immunology. 2008;125(3):408–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02850.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Baltzis D, Qu LK, Papadopoulou S, et al. Resistance to vesicular stomatitis virus infection requires a functional cross talk between the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2alpha kinases PERK and PKR. J Virol. 2004;78(23):12747–12761. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.23.12747-12761.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Nie Y, Hammond GL, Yang JH. Double-stranded RNA deaminase ADAR1 increases host susceptibility to virus infection. J Virol. 2007;81(2):917–923. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01527-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Zhou S, Yang C, Zhao F, et al. Double-stranded RNA deaminase ADAR1 promotes the zika virus replication by inhibiting the activation of protein kinase PKR. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(48):18168–18180. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Chan TH, Lin CH, Qi L, et al. A disrupted RNA editing balance mediated by ADARs (adenosine DeAminases that act on RNA) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2014;63(5):832–843. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Qi L, Chan TH, Tenen DG, et al. RNA editome imbalance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74(5):1301–1306. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-13-3485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Song Y, An O, Ren X, et al. RNA editing mediates the functional switch of COPA in a novel mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol. 2021;74(1):135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Frezza V, Chellini L, Del Verme A, et al. RNA editing in cancer progression. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(21). doi: 10.3390/cancers15215277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Kumar MS, Erkeland SJ, Pester RE, et al. Suppression of non-small cell lung tumor development by the let-7 microRNA family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(10):3903–3908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712321105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Wu W, Klockow JL, Zhang M, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): an overview of current therapies and mechanisms of resistance. Pharmacol Res. 2021;171:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Maas S, Patt S, Schrey M, et al. Underediting of glutamate receptor GluR-B mRNA in malignant gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(25):14687–14692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251531398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Ishiuchi S, Tsuzuki K, Yoshida Y, et al. Blockage of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors suppresses migration and induces apoptosis in human glioblastoma cells. Nat Med. 2002;8(9):971–978. doi: 10.1038/nm746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Ishiuchi S, Yoshida Y, Sugawara K, et al. Ca2±permeable AMPA receptors regulate growth of human glioblastoma via akt activation. J Neurosci. 2007;27(30):7987–8001. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2180-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Qin Y, Li C, Shi X, et al. MLP-Based regression prediction model for compound bioactivity. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2022;10:946329. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.946329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Gumireddy K, Li A, Kossenkov AV, et al. The mRNA-edited form of GABRA3 suppresses GABRA3-mediated akt activation and breast cancer metastasis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10715. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Binothman N, Hachim IY, Lebrun JJ, et al. CPSF6 is a clinically relevant breast cancer vulnerability target: role of CPSF6 in breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2017;21:65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.06.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Dave B, Gonzalez DD, Liu ZB, et al. Role of RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(6). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Nakano M, Fukami T, Gotoh S, et al. A-to-I RNA editing up-regulates human dihydrofolate reductase in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(12):4873–4884. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.775684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Zhang Q, Nguyen T, McMichael M, et al. New small-molecule inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase inhibit streptococcus mutans. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46(2):174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Song IH, Kim YA, Heo SH, et al. ADAR1 expression is associated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(10):1010428317734816. doi: 10.1177/1010428317734816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Sagredo EA, Blanco A, Sagredo AI, et al. ADAR1-mediated rna-editing of 3‘UTRs in breast cancer. Biol Res. 2018;51(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40659-018-0185-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Kung CP, Cottrell KA, Ryu S, et al. Evaluating the therapeutic potential of ADAR1 inhibition for triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene. 2021;40(1):189–202. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01515-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Shen P, Yang T, Chen Q, et al. CircNEIL3 regulatory loop promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression via miRNA sponging and A-to-I rna-editing. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01333-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Wu Y, Grabsch H, Ivanova T, et al. Comprehensive genomic meta-analysis identifies intra-tumoural stroma as a predictor of survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gut. 2013;62(8):1100–1111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Qin YR, Qiao JJ, Chan TH, et al. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing mediated by ADARs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74(3):840–851. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-13-2545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Chen YB, Liao XY, Zhang JB, et al. ADAR2 functions as a tumor suppressor via editing IGFBP7 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2017;50(2):622–630. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Ramírez-Moya J, Baker AR, Slack FJ, et al. ADAR1-mediated RNA editing is a novel oncogenic process in thyroid cancer and regulates miR-200 activity. Oncogene. 2020;39(18):3738–3753. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1248-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Roham PH, Save SN, Sharma S. Human islet amyloid polypeptide: a therapeutic target for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pharm Anal. 2022;12(4):556–569. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2022.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Gan Z, Zhao L, Yang L, et al. RNA editing by ADAR2 is metabolically regulated in pancreatic islets and beta-cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(44):33386–33394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604484200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Yang L, Huang P, Li F, et al. C-Jun amino-terminal kinase-1 mediates glucose-responsive upregulation of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR2 in pancreatic beta-cells. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(11):e48611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Yang L, Zhao L, Gan Z, et al. Deficiency in RNA editing enzyme ADAR2 impairs regulated exocytosis. Faseb J. 2010;24(10):3720–3732. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-152363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Zipeto MA, Court AC, Sadarangani A, et al. ADAR1 activation drives leukemia stem cell self-renewal by impairing let-7 biogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(2):177–191. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Jiang Q, Crews LA, Barrett CL, et al. ADAR1 promotes malignant progenitor reprogramming in chronic myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(3):1041–1046. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213021110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Paz-Yaacov N, Bazak L, Buchumenski I, et al. Elevated RNA editing activity is a major contributor to transcriptomic diversity in tumors. Cell Rep. 2015;13(2):267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, et al. Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 2004;64(11):3753–3756. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-04-0637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, et al. RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell. 2005;120(5):635–647. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Lu L, Katsaros D, de la Longrais IA, et al. Hypermethylation of let-7a-3 in epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with low insulin-like growth factor-ii expression and favorable prognosis. Cancer Res. 2007;67(21):10117–10122. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-07-2544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Zhang XJ, He PP, Li M, et al. Seven novel mutations of the ADAR gene in Chinese families and sporadic patients with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria (DSH). Hum Mutat. 2004;23(6):629–630. doi: 10.1002/humu.9246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Li M, Yang L, Li C, et al. Mutational spectrum of the ADAR1 gene in dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302(6):469–476. doi: 10.1007/s00403-010-1039-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Zhang JY, Chen XD, Zhang Z, et al. The adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 p150 isoform is involved in the pathogenesis of dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(3):637–644. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Zhang J, Jiang C, Wang Z, et al. Investigation of the pathogenesis of ADAR1 gene in dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33(2):e15031. doi: 10.1111/exd.15031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Miyamura Y, Suzuki T, Kono M, et al. Mutations of the rna-specific adenosine deaminase gene (DSRAD) are involved in dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. The Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(3):693–699. doi: 10.1086/378209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Kono M, Matsumoto F, Suzuki Y, et al. Dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria and aicardi-goutières syndrome 6 are phenotypic variants caused by ADAR1 mutations. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(4):875–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2015.12.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Baker AR, Slack FJ. ADAR1 and its implications in cancer development and treatment. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2022;38(8):821–830. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Burnashev N, Zhou Z, Neher E, et al. Fractional calcium currents through recombinant GluR channels of the NMDA, AMPA and kainate receptor subtypes. J Physiol. 1995;485 (Pt 2)(Pt 2):403–418. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Sawada J, Yamashita T, Aizawa H, et al. Effects of antidepressants on GluR2 Q/R site-rna editing in modified HeLa cell line. Neurosci Res. 2009;64(3):251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Schmidt HD, McFarland KN, Darnell SB, et al. ADAR2-dependent GluA2 editing regulates cocaine seeking. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20(11):1460–1466. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Crews LA, Ma W, Ladel L, et al. Reversal of malignant ADAR1 splice isoform switching with Rebecsinib. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30(3):250–263.e256. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Rieswijk L, Claessen SMH, Bekers O, et al . Aflatoxin B1 induces persistent epigenomic effects in primary human hepatocytes associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Toxicology 2016;350-352 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2016.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Kerley-Hamilton JS, Trask HW, Ridley CJ, et al. Inherent and Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Differential Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Greatly Affects Life Span, Atherosclerosis, Cardiac Gene Expression, and Body and Heart Growth in Mice. Toxicological Sciences, 2012;126(2):391–404. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Labib S, Guo CH, Williams A, et al . Toxicogenomic outcomes predictive of forestomach carcinogenesis following exposure to benzo(a)pyrene: Relevance to human cancer risk. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacol. 2013;273(2):269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.05.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Chen B, Xiong J, Ding J, et al . Analysis of the Effects of Cr(VI) Exposure on mRNA ModificationsAnalysis of the Effects of Cr(VI) Exposure on mRNA Modifications. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019; 32(10):2078–2085. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b0024910.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00249.s001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Henry EC, Welle SL, Gasiewicz TA . TCDD and a Putative Endogenous AhR Ligand, ITE, Elicit the Same Immediate Changes in Gene Expression in Mouse Lung Fibroblasts. Toxicological Sciences. 2010;114(1):90–100. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Collí-Dulá RC, Friedman MA, Hansen B, et al . Transcriptomics analysis and hormonal changes of male and female neonatal rats treated chronically with a low dose of acrylamide in their drinking water. Toxicol Rep. 2016;3:414– 426. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
As a review paper, this manuscript does not contain the source or experimental data, so this statement is to announce that our manuscript is irrelevant to any potential source or experimental data conflicts or issues.
