ABSTRACT
The SWI/SNF complex is a chromatin remodeling complex comprised by several proteins such as SMARCA4 or SMARCB1. Mutations in its components can lead to the development of aggressive rhabdoid tumors such as epithelioid sarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor or small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type, among others. These malignancies tend to affect young patients and their prognosis is poor given the lack of effective treatments. Characteristically, these tumors are highly infiltrated by TILs, suggesting that some lymphocytes are recognizing tumor antigens. The use of those TILs as a therapeutic strategy is a promising approach worth exploring. Here, we report the clinical protocol of the TILTS study, a Phase II clinical trial assessing personalized adoptive cell therapy with TILs in patients affected by these tumor types.
Clinical Trial Registration: 2023-504632-17-00 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Keywords: : adoptive cell therapy, immunotherapy, rhabdoid tumors, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, SWI/SNF complex, TILs, TILTS
Plain language summary
Article highlights.
Background & rationale
There is a group of tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex, such as epithelioid sarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor or small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type, among others. These tumors usually have rhabdoid features and tend to affect young patients.
Patients affected by these malignancies have poor prognosis since there are no effective standard treatments.
Tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex are generally infiltrated by a high number of TILs that have been able to recognize a tumor antigen. The use of those TILs as a therapeutic strategy is a promising immunotherapy approach.
The TILTS study
The TILTS study is a clinical trial designed to assess the activity of adoptive cell therapy with TILs in these tumor types.
The TILTS study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter Phase II study that uses personalized TILs treatment in advanced tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex.
The primary end point is ORR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. Secondary end points include toxicity evaluation, PFS and OS, among others. In addition, an associated translational study will be conducted in order to better understand the biology of these malignancies and their relationship with the immune system.
1. Background & rationale
1.1. The SWI/SNF complex
The SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex has recently become a novel target in cancer treatment since aberrations in genes encoding in its subunits have been found in almost 25% of malignancies. It is an ATP-dependent complex involved in the process of chromatin remodeling which is comprised of a variety of proteins from the SWI and SNF gene families along with additional polypeptides. This complex has ATPase activity and can disrupt histone-DNA interactions in nucleosomes in an ATP-dependent manner. Thus, the SWI/SNF subfamily is crucial for rearranging nucleosomes, making chromatin more accessible therefore allowing gene expression to be regulated [1–3].
1.2. Tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex
The role of the SWI/SNF complex in cancer was first suggested with the identification of SMARCB1. Inactivating mutations in SMARCB1 were found in rhabdoid tumors, a rare and aggressive pediatric soft-tissue sarcoma [4,5]. Later, studies on genetically modified mice lacking Smarcb1 showed that these mice developed cancer quickly and with complete penetrance [6]. The importance of SWI/SNF mutations became more evident with cancer genome-sequencing projects. Thus, mutations in ARID1A were described in almost half of ovarian clear-cell carcinomas and ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, making it the most frequently mutated SWI/SNF subunit found [7,8]. PBRM1 mutations were also discovered in 41% of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma cases [9]. Following these findings, numerous other cancers were found to have mutations in genes encoding the SWI/SNF complex. Overall, at least nine SWI/SNF subunits are recurrently mutated across different solid tumors, with these mutations present in nearly 25% of all tumor types [10]. These mutations can occur during tumor evolution in cancers with high genomic instability or as an initial oncogenic event in highly aggressive tumors. Such cancers, often with por prognosis and affecting young patients, include epithelioid sarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), renal medullary carcinoma, epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, myoepithelial carcinoma, extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, poorly differentiated chordoma, or sinonasal basaloid carcinoma [3]. Unfortunately, these malignancies, which typically present with in advanced stage, have no effective systemic treatments. Moreover, their rarity makes it challenging to conduct tumor-specific clinical trials.
1.3. Rationale for treatment with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are usually present in high numbers in tumors associated with SWI/SNF aberrations even though these malignancies do not usually show a high tumor mutation burden [11,12]. The biologic reasons for this feature are not clearly understood but might be associated with changes in gene expression due to aberrant chromatin remodeling [3].
Regardless of the underlying cause, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) suggests that some tumor antigens are being recognized by the immune system, highlighting a potential weakness that can be exploited by immunotherapy. Notably, a study showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors led to tumor regression in up to 70% of mice with Smarcb1-mutant rhabdoid tumors [11]. The underlying mechanism was unique compared with other SWI/SNF mutations, as the loss of SMARCB1 resulted in the expression of endogenous retroviruses, which activated double-stranded RNA-sensing pathways and triggered interferon signaling. Additionally, research involving patients with SMARCA4-mutant SCCOHT found that these tumors responded well to immune checkpoint inhibitors, probably because they have an immune-active microenvironment. even though they have a low number of mutations [13].
Another immunotherapy strategy, TILs treatment, represents a potentially effective treatment for patients with a variety of solid tumors. This treatment modality involves the recovery and ex vivo expansion of autologous antitumor lymphocytes that have infiltrated a patient's tumor. The basic concept of using lymphocytes for the therapy of cancer arose from animal experiments that demonstrated, by histologic analysis, the presence of T-lymphocytes within the microenvironment of most solid tumors and their metastases [14–16]. Subsequent findings have clearly shown a predictive relationship between the frequency and phenotype of TIL in solid tumors (especially CD8+ T-cells) and an increased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with melanoma [17–20], lung cancer [21–24], ovarian cancer [25,26], squamous cell carcinomas [27,28], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer [29], basal-like breast cancer [30–34], triple negative breast cancer [35] and colorectal cancer [36–39]. These findings support the development of therapies based on the isolation and expansion of autologous TIL cells as a therapeutic agent against solid tumors. Indeed, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved the TILs therapy lifileucel for advanced melanoma [40]. Moreover, in the first randomized Phase III clinical trial with TILs in solid tumors, an academic TILs therapy has demonstrated superiority in terms of PFS compared with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma [41].
TILs therapy has several theoretical and practical advantages over active immunization and non-specific immune stimulation. The ex vivo environment allows expansion/ production of very high cell numbers in the absence of suppressive factors (e.g., regulatory T-cells which are present in the tumor microenvironment), allowing re-infusion of much higher numbers of tumor-reactive T-cells versus other approaches [42–44]. The TILs product recognizes a wider array of tumor antigens such as mutated tumor neoantigens versus a single target [45–48].
Therefore, the objective of the TILTS study is to develop a personalized adoptive cell therapy using TILs in patients affected by advanced tumors associated with SWI/SNF complex alterations.
1.4. Objectives & end points
The objectives and end points of the TILTS study can be found in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of study objectives and end points of the TILTS study.
| Study Objectives |
Clinical: • Primary ○ To evaluate the efficacy of autologous TILs as a single therapy in patients affected by unresectable or advanced tumors with alterations in the SWI-SNF complex, as determined by ORR, using the RECIST v1.1, as assessed by investigator. • Secondary ○ To characterize the benefit in terms of survival as determined by PFS and OS. ○ To determine the exploratory response end points CRR, DOR and DCR. ○ To characterize the safety profile of the TILs therapy as a single therapy, as measured by the incidence of AEs according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Translational/exploratory: • To study mechanisms of immunogenicity, antigen recognition, TILs anti-tumor activity and changes in the stool microbiome and specific TCR population during treatment. • To analyze the tumor immune microenvironment in tumor samples. |
| End points |
Primary: • ORR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. Secondary: • Toxicity evaluation: nature and frequency of AEs, SAEs, alterations in laboratory test results, vital sign measurements, physical examination findings graded, when applicable, according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0. • CRR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. • DOR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. • DCR per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. • PFS per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigator. • OS |
AE: Adverse event; CRR: Complete response rate; DCR: Disease control rate; DOR: Duration of response; NCI-CTCAE: National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ORR: Overall response rate; OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival; RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor; SAE: Severe adverse event; SWI/SNF: SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable; TCR: T-cell receptor; TIL: Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte.
1.5. Trial design
The TILTS study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter Phase II study evaluating adoptive cell therapy with TILs as a single therapy in patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced solid tumors associated with SWI/SNF aberrations. Patients will be treated at 3 centers in Spain: Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona and Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (HM CIOCC), Madrid
The following study periods will take place:
1.5.1. Pre-screening phase
After signing the pre-screening informed consent form (ICF), a tumor sample will be obtained as the source of the TIL product.
1.5.2. Manufacturing of cell product
Minimum 26 days from tumor resection.
1.5.3. Screening & enrollment phase
Up to 4 weeks (28 days) from signing the ICF. Upon confirmation of study eligibility, patients will be elected for treatment.
1.5.4. Treatment period
Up to 10 days, including nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion (NMA-LD) chemotherapy (5 days), TILs infusion (1 day) followed by interleukin-2 (IL-2) administrations (1 to 4 days).
1.5.5. Assessment period
Begins after TILs infusion on Day 0 and ends upon disease progression, with the start of a new anticancer therapy, partial withdrawal of consent to study assessments, or 10 years, whichever occurs first.
1.5.6. Long-term follow-up period
Begins after the assessment period ends and stops at the end of study (EOS), where EOS can be due to death, patient lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination by sponsor, or 10 years from TILs infusion, whichever occurs first.
1.6. Eligibility criteria
Patients are eligible for the TILTS study if they have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of any of the tumor types stated in Table 2 in the advanced setting.
Table 2.
Tumor types associated with aberrations in the SWI/SNF complex eligible for the TILTS study.
| Eligible tumor types |
|---|
| Epithelioid sarcoma |
| Malignant rhabdoid tumor |
| Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) |
| Renal medullary carcinoma |
| Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST) |
| Myoepithelial carcinoma |
| Extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma |
| Poorly differentiated chordoma |
| Sinonasal basaloid carcinoma |
| Other tumors associated with SWI/SNFc mutations |
Main inclusion criteria can be found in Table 3 and main exclusion criteria can be found in Table 4.
Table 3.
Summary of main inclusion criteria for the TILTS study.
| Inclusion criteria |
|---|
| Pre-screening phase and screening and enrollment phase |
| Patients must be ≥18 years at the time of consent. |
| Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and an estimated life expectancy of ≥3 months in the opinion of the Investigator. |
| All patients must have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of solid tumors associated with SWI/SNFc-mutated monogenic diseases. These solid tumors include, but are not limited to: – Epithelioid sarcoma – Malignant rhabdoid tumor – Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) – Renal medullary carcinoma – Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST) – Myoepithelial carcinoma – Extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma – Poorly differentiated chordoma – Sinonasal basaloid carcinoma. – Other tumors associated with SWI/SNFc mutations |
| Patients must have at least 1 resectable/biopsiable lesion (or aggregate lesions) of a minimum 1.5 cm in diameter for TIL investigational product production. It is encouraged that tumor tissue be obtained from multiple and diverse metastatic lesions, as long as the surgical resection/biopsy do not pose additional risks to the patient. A minimum of 21 days must have elapsed from the last dose of chemotherapy/radiotherapy. |
| If the lesion considered for resection/biopsy for TIL generation is within a previously irradiated field, the lesion must have demonstrated radiographic progression prior to resection. |
| Patients must be seronegative for HIV antibody (patients who are HIV seropositive may be less responsive and more susceptible to toxicities related to this experimental treatment since they may have a decreased immune competence). |
| Patients must be seronegative for active hepatitis B (defined as having a negative hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] test), and seronegative for hepatitis C antibody. Patients with a history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and having a negative HBsAg test and a positive antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are eligible. Patients with the hepatitis C antibody test positive are eligible only if tested for the presence of antigen by RT-PCR and be HCV RNA negative |
| Patients must be seronegative for active CMV, HSV and EBV infections. |
| Patients must be seronegative for Treponema pallidum antibody. |
| Only for screening and enrollment phase |
| Patients must have a measurable disease as defined by RECIST 1.1. Lesions that are partially resected for TIL generation that are still measurable per RECIST may be selected as target lesions |
| Patients of childbearing potential or those with partners of childbearing potential must be willing to practice an approved method of highly effective birth control during treatment and for 12 months after receiving all protocol related therapy |
| Patients must have the following hematologic parameters: a. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1 × 109/l without the support of filgrastim. b. Hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dl c. Platelet count ≥100 × 109/l d. Patients must have adequate organ function: – Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/GOT ≤three-times the upper limit of normal (ULN), patients with liver metastasis ≤five-times ULN; – An estimated creatinine clearance ≥40 ml/min using the Cockcroft Gault formula at Screening; – Total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dl: Patients with Gilbert's Syndrome must have a total bilirubin ≤3 mg/dl. – Serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl or measured creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate estimation: (140 – age) × (weight in kg) × (0.85 if female)/72 × (serum creatinine in mg/dl). |
| Patients must have a washout period from prior anticancer therapy(ies) of a minimum duration, as detailed below prior to the first study treatment (ie, start of NMA-LD): – Chemotherapy: adjuvant, neoadjuvant or definitive chemotherapy/chemoradiation is allowed provided the washout is a minimum of 21 days, prior to the start of treatment. – Prior immunotherapy, checkpoint-targeted therapy, other monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), or vaccines are allowed if disease progression is confirmed prior to or within the washout period of ≥21 days prior to the start of NMA-LD. |
| Palliative radiation therapy: Prior external beam radiation is allowed at least 2 weeks before TILs infusion provided all radiation-related toxicities are resolved to Grade 1 or baseline, excluding alopecia, skin pigmentation change, or other clinically insignificant events, eg, small area radiation dermatitis or rectal or urinary urgency. |
| Previous surgical procedure(s) is permitted provided that wound healing has occurred, all complications have resolved and at least 14 days have elapsed (for major operative procedures) prior to the tumor resection |
| Patients must have recovered from all prior anticancer treatment-related adverse events to Grade ≤1 or baseline except for alopecia or vitiligo. |
| In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient must be able to complete all study required procedures and can understand the requirements of the study and freely give consent to participate. |
Table 4.
Summary of main exclusion criteria for the TILTS study.
| Exclusion criteria |
|---|
| Pre-screening phase and screening and enrollment phase |
| Patients who have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45% or who are New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or higher. |
| Patients who have obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease and/or have a documented FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) ≤50% of predicted normal. |
| Patients who have received an organ allograft or prior cell transfer therapy that included a nonmyeloablative or myeloablative chemotherapy regimen within the past 20 years. |
| Patients with symptomatic and/or untreated brain metastases: – Patients with definitively-treated brain metastases will be considered for enrollment if, prior to the start of treatment the patient is clinically stable for ≥2 weeks, there are no new brain lesions via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) post-treatment and the patient does not require ongoing corticosteroid treatment. |
| Patients requiring regular treatment with steroids at a dose higher than prednisone 10 mg/day (or equivalent). Use of inhaled, topical steroids and use of systemic physiologic corticosteroid replacement are permitted. |
| Patients who have an active medical illness(es), which in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose increased risks for study participation, such as systemic infections (e.g., syphilis or any other infection requiring antibiotics), coagulation disorders, or other active major medical illnesses of the cardiovascular, respiratory, or immune systems. |
| Patients may not have active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (including pneumonitis, inflammatory bowel disease [eg, colitis or Crohn's disease], diverticulitis [with the exception of diverticulosis], systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis syndrome, or Wegener syndrome [granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Graves' disease, rheumatoid arthritis, hypophysitis, uveitis, etc.]). The following are exceptions to this criterion: – Patients with vitiligo or alopecia; – Patients with hypothyroidism (eg, following Hashimoto syndrome) stable on hormone replacement; – Any chronic skin condition that does not require systemic therapy; or – Patients with celiac disease controlled by diet alone. |
| Patients who have received a live or attenuated vaccination within 28 days prior to the start of treatment. |
| Patients who have any form of primary immunodeficiency (such as severe combined immunodeficiency disease [SCID] and acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS]). |
| Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any of components of the study drugs and any component of TIL product formulation. |
| Patients who have had another primary malignancy within the previous 3 years (except for those which do not require treatment or have been curatively treated >1 year ago, and in the judgment of the Investigator, does not pose a significant risk of recurrence). |
| Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. |
1.7. Interventions
The TILs therapy is comprised of the following steps:
-
▪
Tumor resection or tumor biopsy to provide the autologous tissue that serves as the source of the TILs cellular product.
-
▪
TILs investigational product manufacturing at a central Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) facility located at the Blood and Tissue Bank (BST), Barcelona, Spain. TILs product is composed of live, autologous, tumor-derived T-lymphocytes, expanded, adjusted to the dose range of 5 × 108 – 1.1 × 1011 viable cells and resuspended in conditioning solution for iv infusion.
Tumor resection or tumor biopsy to provide the autologous tissue that serves as the source of the TILs cellular product.
TILs investigational product manufacturing at a central Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) facility located at the Blood and Tissue Bank (BST), Barcelona, Spain. TILs product is composed of live, autologous, tumor-derived T-lymphocytes, expanded, adjusted to the dose range of 5 × 108 – 1.1 × 1011 viable cells and resuspended in conditioning solution for iv infusion.
Patients will undergo baseline imaging during the screening period before the initiation of NMA-LD chemotherapy regimen.
A 5-day NMA-LD chemotherapy preconditioning regimen consisting of 2 days of iv cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) with mesna (per site standard of care) on day -5 and day -4 and 5 days of iv fludarabine (25 mg/m2: day -5 through day -1).
Infusion of TILs (day 0).
Following TILs infusion, up to 6 iv IL-2 600,000 IU/kg doses maximum will be administered. IL-2 administrations may begin as soon as 3 h after, but no later than 24 h after completion of the TIL infusion.
Figure 1 depicts a summary of the TILTS study interventions.
Figure 1.

Schema of interventions in the TILTS study.
EOS: End of study; EOT: End of treatment; IL-2: Interleukin-2; NMA-LD: Nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion; TIL: Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte.
1.8. Sample size & statistical considerations
The TILTS study is planned to include at least 11 patients to show an increase from 5% overall response rate (ORR) that would be expected with standard treatment to 35% with TILs therapy in the intention to treat (ITT) population, by using a one-sided binomial test with type I error 5%, power 80% and assuming 10% attrition rate. Enrolled patients who did not receive TILs infusion will be replaced.
The statistical analysis is based on use of descriptive. Continuous data will be summarized as the number of patients with no missing data, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum values. Categorical data will be summarized as counts and their related percentages, where applicable.
1.9. Ethics & dissemination
The TILTS study has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and has been granted the EUCT number 2023-504632-17-00. The study is being conducted in full compliance with the principles of the “Declaration of Helsinki” (as amended in Tokyo, Venice, Hong Kong and South Africa), International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines and with the local laws and regulations. All Investigators will ensure adherence to ICH guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Clinical Safety Data Management. All subjects give their written informed consent for inclusion before they participate in the study. The protocol was approved by a reference ethics committee (CEIm Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain).
The Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS), the Spanish Group for Investigation in Ovarian Cancer (GEICO) and the Spanish Group for Rare Tumors (GETHI) will disseminate the clinical study by publishing periodical newsletters in order to warrant the expected recruitment.
2. Conclusion
Patients affected by tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex usually have very poor prognosis due to the lack of effective treatments. Moreover, these malignancies tend to affect young patients so it is necessary to find novel therapeutic strategies in order to improve their survival.
This group of tumors are generally infiltrated by a high number of TILs, indicating that an immune response has been triggered. Therefore, immunotherapy might be an effective treatment strategy. Indeed, some preliminary reports using immune-checkpoint inhibition in these malignancies have shown promising results. Another immunotherapy approach, the use of TILs as a treatment, is a therapeutic strategy worth exploring.
Thus, the TILTS study aims to assess the activity of a personalized TILs treatment in patients affected by advanced tumors associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex. The results of this clinical trial will help to achieve the much-needed goal of improving these patients' prognosis.
Acknowledgments
This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project ICI21/00110. Funded by European Union – NextGenerationEU. We thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. This research has been funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (grant 53/2021).
Funding Statement
This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project ICI21/00110. Funded by European Union – NextGenerationEU. We thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. This research has been funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (grant 53/2021).
Author contributions
J Martin-Liberal, E Garralda, J García-Donas, JJ Soto-Castillo, C Codony, S Martin-Lluesma, S Muñoz, V Galvao, J Lostes, M Rotxes, A Gros and JM Piulats contributed to the design of the study and writing of the protocol. A Muñoz, R Moreno, R Alemany, A Gros and JM Piulats contributed to the analysis of study samples at the central laboratory. C Prat-Vidal, J Palomero and A Gros contributed to the manufacturing of the cell product. S Muñoz is the medical monitor of the study. J Martin-Liberal, E Garralda, J García-Donas and XG del Muro contributed to the identification and enrolment of patients in the study. A Mussetti and A Sureda contributed to the treatment of patients. J Martin-Liberal wrote this manuscript. All authors read, reviewed and approved the protocol and the final manuscript.
Financial disclosure
This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project ICI21/00110. Funded by European Union – NextGenerationEU. We thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. This research has been funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (grant 53/2021). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Competing interests disclosure
J Martin-Liberal has received lecture fees from Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi; advisory fees from BMS, Highlight Therapeutics, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi; and travel grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Ipsen. E Garralda has received grants from Novartis, Roche, Thermo Fisher, AstraZeneca, Taiho, BeiGene, Janssen; consulting fees from Roche, Ellipses Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Global Services, Seattle Genetics, Thermo Fisher, MabDiscovery, Anaveon, F-Star Therapeutics, Hengrui, Sanofi, Incyte, Medscape; lecture fees from MSD, Roche, Thermo Fisher, Novartis, SeaGen; and has stocks in 1TRIALSP. J García-Donas has received advisory fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Gilead, Roche, Incyte; research grants from Pfizer, Astellas, Gilead, Merck, GSK, Bristol-Myers Squibb; and travel grants from Ipsen. JJ Soto-Castillo has received travel and accommodations grants from Pfizer, Eisai and Seagen. A Mussetti has received consulting fees from Takeda, BMS, Merck, Jazz Pharma; and research funding from Gilead/Kite. XG del Muro has received lecture fees from Astellas, Pfizer, Eisai, Recordati; advisory fees from MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Ipsen, Roche, Pharmamar, GSK, Merck, Eisai, Deciphera, Recordati, Astellas; and travel grants from Merck, Pfizer, Roche. A Sureda has received honoraria from AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GenMab, Gilead, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda; speaker fees from Takeda; consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS/Celgene, GenMab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Takeda; and research grants from Takeda. R Alemany has received honoraria and research funding from Theriva Biologics. A Gros is a member of the scientific advisory board of Achilles Therapeutics, SingulaBIO, RootPath and BioNTech; consults for PACT Pharma, Instil Bio; and is co-inventor of patents licensed and with royalties E-059-2013/0 E-085-2013/0, E-149-2015/0. JM Piulats has received advisory fees from Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi; research grants from BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Mirati, MSD, Pfier; and travel grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer.
The authors have no other competing interests or relevant affiliations with any organization or entity with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Writing disclosure
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Ethical conduct of research
The TILTS study has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and has been granted the EUCT number 2023-504632-17-00. The study is being conducted in full compliance with the principles of the “Declaration of Helsinki” (as amended in Tokyo, Venice, Hong Kong and South Africa), International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines and with the local laws and regulations. All Investigators will ensure adherence to ICH guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Clinical Safety Data Management. All subjects give their informed consent for inclusion before they participate in the study. The protocol was approved by a reference ethics committee (CEIm Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain).
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
- 1.Shain AH, Pollack JR. The spectrum of SWI/SNF mutations, ubiquitous in human cancers. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(1):e55119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kadoch C, Hargreaves DC, Hodges C, et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):592–601. doi: 10.1038/ng.2628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Soto-Castillo JJ, Llavata-Marti L, Fort-Culillas R, et al. SWI/SNF complex alterations in tumors with rhabdoid features: novel therapeutic approaches and opportunities for adoptive cell therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):11143. doi: 10.3390/ijms241311143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Comprehensive review on the SWI/SNF complex and its implications in cancer development.
- 4.Biegel JA, Zhou JY, Rorke LB, et al. Germ-line and acquired mutations of INI1 in atypical teratoid and rhabdoid tumors. Cancer Res. 1999;59(1):74–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • One of the first descriptions of SMARCB1 mutations as oncogenic driver in rhabdoid tumors.
- 5.Sévenet N, Sheridan E, Amram D, et al. Constitutional mutations of the hSNF5/INI1 gene predispose to a variety of cancers. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65(5):1342–1348. doi: 10.1086/302639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roberts CW, Galusha SA, McMenamin ME, et al. Haploinsufficiency of Snf5 (integrase interactor 1) predisposes to malignant rhabdoid tumors in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(25):13796–13800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250492697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wiegand KC, Shah SP, Al-Agha OM, et al. ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(16):1532–1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jones S, Wang TL, Shih IM, et al. Frequent mutations of chromatin remodeling gene ARID1A in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Science. 2010;330(6001):228–231. doi: 10.1126/science.1196333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Varela I, Tarpey P, Raine K, et al. Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma. Nature. 2011;469(7331):539–542. doi: 10.1038/nature09639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mittal P, Roberts CWM. The SWI/SNF complex in cancer – biology, biomarkers and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(7):435–448. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0357-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leruste A, Tosello J, Ramos RN, et al. Clonally expanded T cells reveal immunogenicity of rhabdoid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2019;36(6):597–612.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chun HE, Johann PD, Milne K, et al. Identification and analyses of extra-cranial and cranial rhabdoid tumor molecular subgroups reveal tumors with cytotoxic T cell infiltration. Cell Rep. 2019;29(8):2338–2354.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jelinic P, Ricca J, Van Oudenhove E, et al. Immune-active microenvironment in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type: rationale for immune checkpoint blockade. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(7):787–790. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Rationale for the use of immunotherapy in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type, a malignancy associated with alterations in the SWI/SNF complex.
- 14.Rosenberg SA, Spiess P, Lafreniere R. A new approach to the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Science. 1986;233(4770):1318–1321. doi: 10.1126/science.3489291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Seminal report on the potentials of TILs therapy for cancer treatment.
- 15.Vose BM, Moore M. Human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: a marker of host response. Semin Hematol. 1985;22(1):27–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yron I, Wood TA, Spiess PJ, et al. In vitro growth of murine T cells. V. The isolation and growth of lymphoid cells infiltrating syngeneic solid tumors. J Immunol. 1980;125(1):238–245. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.125.1.238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haanen JB, Baars A, Gomez R, et al. Melanoma-specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes but not circulating melanoma-specific T cells may predict survival in resected advanced-stage melanoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55(4):451–458. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0018-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ladányi A, Kiss J, Somlai B, et al. Density of DC-LAMP(+) mature dendritic cells in combination with activated T lymphocytes infiltrating primary cutaneous melanoma is a strong independent prognostic factor. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007;56(9):1459–1469. doi: 10.1007/s00262-007-0286-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Azimi F, Scolyer RA, Rumcheva P, Moncrieff M, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte grade is an independent predictor of sentinel lymph node status and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2678–2683. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Erdag G, Schaefer JT, Smolkin ME, et al. Immunotype and immunohistologic characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72(5):1070–1080. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Horne ZD, Jack R, Gray ZT, et al. Increased levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with improved recurrence-free survival in stage 1A non-small-cell lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;171(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kilic A, Landreneau RJ, Luketich JD, et al. Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlates with disease recurrence and survival in patients with large non-small-cell lung cancer tumors. J Surg Res. 2011;167(2):207–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.08.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu H, Zhang T, Ye J, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to chemotherapy in patients with advance non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(10):1849–1856. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1231-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ruffini E, Asioli S, Filosso PL, et al. Clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in lung neoplasms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(2):365–371; discussion 71–72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.10.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hagemann AR, Hagemann IS, Cadungog M, et al. Tissue-based immune monitoring II: multiple tumor sites reveal immunologic homogeneity in serous ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;12(4):367–377. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.4.16908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Milne K, Alexander C, Webb JR, et al. Absolute lymphocyte count is associated with survival in ovarian cancer independent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Transl Med. 2012;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balermpas P, Michel Y, Wagenblast J, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to definitive chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(2):501–509. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang J, Jia Y, Wang N, Zhang X, et al. The clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and neutrophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2014;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luen SJ, Salgado R, Fox S, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab or placebo in addition to trastuzumab and docetaxel: a retrospective analysis of the CLEOPATRA study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):52–62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30631-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu S, Lachapelle J, Leung S, et al. CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration is an independent favorable prognostic indicator in basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/bcr3148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ali HR, Provenzano E, Dawson SJ, et al. Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12,439 patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(8):1536–1543. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe DG, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):1949–1955. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mahmoud SM, Lee AH, Paish EC, et al. The prognostic significance of B lymphocytes in invasive carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(2):545–553. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1620-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mahmoud SM, Lee AH, Paish EC, et al. Tumour-infiltrating macrophages and clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(2):159–163. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-20035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ibrahim EM, Al-Foheidi ME, Al-Mansour MM, et al. The prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148(3):467–476. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3185-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313(5795):1960–1964. doi: 10.1126/science.1129139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Galon J, Mlecnik B, Bindea G, et al. Towards the introduction of the ‘Immunoscore’ in the classification of malignant tumours. J Pathol. 2014;232(2):199–209. doi: 10.1002/path.4287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pagès F, Berger A, Camus M, et al. Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2654–2666. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pagès F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, et al. In situ cytotoxic and memory T cells predict outcome in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5944–5951. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sarnaik AA, Hamid O, Khushalani NI, et al. Lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(24):2656–2666. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Pivotal clinical trial for the first approved commercial TILs treatment.
- 41.Rohaan MW, Borch TH, van den Berg JH, et al. Tumor-Infiltrating lymphocyte therapy or ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(23):2113–2125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2210233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• First randomized Phase III clinical trial with adoptive cell therapy in solid tumors.
- 42.Strauss L, Bergmann C, Szczepanski M, et al. A unique subset of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T cells secreting interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-beta1 mediates suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4345–4354. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Martin-Orozco N, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Melanoma cells express ICOS ligand to promote the activation and expansion of T-regulatory cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70(23):9581–9590. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cao X, Cai SF, Fehniger TA, et al. Granzyme B and perforin are important for regulatory T cell-mediated suppression of tumor clearance. Immunity. 2007;27(4):635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Robbins PF, Lu YC, El-Gamil M, et al. Mining exomic sequencing data to identify mutated antigens recognized by adoptively transferred tumor-reactive T cells. Nat Med. 2013;19(6):747–752. doi: 10.1038/nm.3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tran E, Turcotte S, Gros A, et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science. 2014;344(6184):641–645. doi: 10.1126/science.1251102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kvistborg P, van Buuren MM, Schumacher TN. Human cancer regression antigens. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(2):284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van Rooij N, van Buuren MM, Philips D, et al. Tumor exome analysis reveals neoantigen-specific T-cell reactivity in an ipilimumab-responsive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(32):e439–e442. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.7521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
