Abstract
Background and objectives
Although rare, complications like skin dehiscence and necrosis after neurosurgery pose significant challenges by increasing the risk of infections spreading to the epidural, subdural, or intracerebral spaces. This retrospective, single-center study aims to assess the prior clinical courses, neuroplastic repair, and outcomes of patients with skin defects following cranial neurosurgical procedures, and to outline our interdisciplinary reconstructive protocol.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed on cranial surgeries conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, spanning from 2017 to 2023. Patients with skin defects requiring the combined expertise of neurosurgery and plastic surgery for effective treatment were included. The sizes of the skin defects were measured using intraoperative photographs analyzed with the freeware ImageJ software, version 2018. All patients provided informed consent for the surgeries. If informed consent was not possible due to neurological deterioration, consent was sought from adult representatives or next of kin except for acute circumstances. All patients admitted to our hospital agree to the pseudonymized use of their medical data and tissue specimens for research purposes in their treatment contract.
Results
A cohort of 24 patients experiencing wound healing complications after neurosurgical procedures underwent a total of 29 interdisciplinary surgeries for the reconstruction of skin, dural, and bone defects. After the neuroplastic surgery, 8 out of 24 patients (33.3%) developed surgical complications, with 6 of these requiring revision surgeries due to persistent cranial infection. In all cases, permanent wound closure was successfully achieved following adherence to the proposed treatment algorithm.
Conclusions
Our study underscores the necessity of an integrated neurosurgical and plastic surgical approach to effectively manage wound healing complications in a single stage surgery. Key interventions include differentiation between necrosis and gaping lesions, alongside precise management of neurosurgical issues like cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and hydrocephalus. Plastic surgical expertise in assessing the possibilities and limitations of both local and free flap surgeries is essential.
Keywords: Free flap, Necrosis, Question mark shaped incision, Scalp reconstruction, Wound dehiscence
Introduction
Causes of cranial wound healing disorders and regimens for scalp defect reconstructions have been described in the literature [5, 6, 9, 15, 17–19, 23, 24, 26]. Predisposing factors and comorbidities, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, diabetes mellitus, and prior irradiation, have been recognized as fundamental contributors to the development of postoperative wound healing disorders [4, 15, 18, 23, 28]. Additionally, question mark shaped incisions [16, 27] (widely used for decompressive craniectomies) as well as extracranial-intracranial bypass surgeries [4, 24], are known contributors to skin necrosis due to the partial disruption of the arterial supply to the skin flap.
In patients with a history of multiple surgeries, challenges such as complex scar formations, diminished skin elasticity, and wound margin inversion, complicate primary wound closure in subsequent revisions. These circumstances require plastic surgical techniques, including local or free flaps, chosen based on the quality of surrounding skin and the size of the defect. Additionally, infections in deeper cranial areas, potentially involving open paranasal sinuses or mastoid air cells, along with dural defects, demand neurosurgical intervention. An integrative, interdisciplinary approach can thus enable addressing these complexities in a single surgical session, enhancing patient outcomes [1, 11, 15, 20]. Leveraging our interdisciplinary expertise with this heterogeneous patient cohort, our goal was to formulate a treatment algorithm.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients operated between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023, who presented with wound dehiscence or necrotic scalp lesions. All patients were treated through a collaborative effort between plastic and neurosurgery teams. In contrast to the relatively straightforward cranial reconstructions performed for skin tumors, our study addresses the significantly more complex scenarios involving patients with complications arising from neurosurgical procedures. This distinction is crucial as the presence of underlying neurosurgical issues presents unique challenges and necessitates a nuanced, interdisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes [2]. Ischemic necrosis was defined as a grey/black discolorated and demarking skin area. Wound dehiscence primarily presented as circular or oval “hole like” openings, revealing underlying structures such as bone flaps, allografts, or the dura mater. Patients presenting with skin defects exceeding 1.5 cm², or exhibiting irradiated, thickened, thinned, and inelastic surrounding skin characteristics, underwent preliminary assessment by a plastic surgeon to evaluate the feasibility of achieving primary tension-free wound closure. In case primary closure appeared unfeasible, and additional plastic surgical expertise was needed, an interdisciplinary surgical strategy was formulated. This involved planning the ideal timing and extent of surgery, depending on the progression of necrosis demarcation and the presence of a CSF leak or further intracranial pathologies, as well as selection of the flap type and shape of skin incision. Surgeries were conducted interdisciplinarily from skin incision to skin closure.
Radiology
Preoperative MR-scans were performed to evaluate intracranial abscesses, as these findings determined the urgency for surgery. Postoperative CT- and MR- scans were conducted to evaluate blood collections and follow intracranial infectious changes. In preparation for free-flap surgery, we included angio CT scans or Doppler ultrasound in the preoperative diagnostic evaluation to visualize the donor and recipient vessels.
Surgery
At the request of the plastic surgeon, large skin areas were shaved to provide adequate space for skin mobilization and the potential for additional incisions. Skin shaving was performed using electric shavers, as disposable razors were avoided due to their tendency to damage superficial skin layers. Following the marking of the cranial skin incision, plastic and neurosurgical procedures were initiated concurrently, particularly in cases requiring the harvest of fascia lata or free flap preparation. Particular care was taken to avoid scratching the skin with the forceps, and skin wound clips were avoided due to their potential to compromise skin perfusion. Intraoperative bacterial swabs were taken. In most patients, careful debridement, including the removal of the bone flap or allograft, was performed. This was followed by smoothing of sharp bone edges using a high-speed drill to protect the overlying skin. Special care was taken to ensure closure of the paranasal sinuses and to achieve a watertight dural closure. Whenever possible, skin defects were covered with local flaps, whereas free flaps were reserved for large defects or when the surrounding skin quality was poor. A tension-free skin closure was paramount to ensure optimal blood supply to the wound margins. Clinical and radiological data were extracted from electronic medical records.
Perioperative antibiotic regimen
In cases involving cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage or extensive necrotic tissue, immediate antibiotic therapy was initiated. Standard perioperative broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered in all other cases. Microbiological swabs were collected intraoperatively, and following the availability of culture results and antibiogram data, targeted intravenous antibiotic therapy was administered for a minimum of one week before transitioning to oral therapy. Antibiotics were discontinued upon favorable progression of wound healing. In cases of persistent infection, antibiotic treatment was extended until clinical signs, laboratory values, and MRI findings confirmed the resolution of the infection.
Skin defect size analysis
Sizes of skin defects were calculated from intraoperative photographs with the freeware ImageJ software version 2018 [21]. A ruler was either placed next to the skin defect intraoperatively, or the bony defect measured on preoperative CCT scans was used as a reference.
Statistical analysis
The primary outcome of interest was patient survival. Patient demographics (sex and age), underlying neurosurgical pathologies, characteristics of the skin defect (size and type, distinguishing between necrosis and non-necrotic defects), comorbidities, the time elapsed between neurosurgery and interdisciplinary surgical intervention, and the presence of a question mark-shaped incision were among the variables assessed. Nominal variables were summarized using absolute and relative frequencies. The distribution of continuous variables was described by the mean ± standard deviation and the range (minimum-maximum). Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software R (Version 4.3.1).
Results
Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023, our institution performed 8,094 cranial surgeries, including burr holes for chronic subdural hematomas, shunt procedures, and more complex surgeries for tumor resections, trauma, or decompressive craniectomies. During the given period, 225 surgeries were performed due to wound healing complications, affecting 175 patients. Whilst most wound margins could be easily adjusted without the requiring interdisciplinary managemenent, 24 patients underwent a total of 29 surgeries involving both plastic surgery and neurosurgical teams. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. 24 patients − 16 males (66.7%) and 8 females (33.3%) - aged 27.3 to 86.5 years (57.9 ± 15.3) required 29 interdisciplinary surgeries due to wound healing disorders with skin defects. Underlying neurosurgical pathologies were traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 13 patients (54.2%), intracranial tumor in 6 patients (25%), neurovascular diseases in 4 patients (16.7%), and hydrocephalus with prior ventriculo-peritoneal shunt implantation in 1 patient (4.2%). During the initial combined plastic and neurosurgical intervention, 7 patients (29.2%) were neurologically intact, another 6 patients (25%) were comatose, 5 patients (20.8%) were hemiparetic and 6 patients (25%) presented with other focal neurological deficits.
Table 1.
Patient ID | Surgery ID | side | sex | age at interdisciplinary surgery | initial pathology | trauma flap (question mark incision) |
ischemic necrosis | skin defect size (cm2) | flap type | defect site | survival time (days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | left | m | 57 | trauma | yes | 11 | occipital rotation flap | temporooccipital | dead after 150 | |
1 | 2 | right | m | - | trauma | yes | 6 | bipedicled flap | temporooccipital | - | |
2 | 3 | left | m | 50 | cerebrovascular - EC/IC bypass | no | 39.9 | temporal rotation flap | frontotemporal | 1328 | |
3 | 4 | left | m | 67 | trauma | yes | 6.5 | occipital rotation flap | parietooccipital | dead after 26 | |
4 | 5 | left | m | 31 | AVM - resection | yes | n/a | occipital rotation flap | parietooccipital | 1176 | |
4 | 6 | left | m | - | heterologous CP | yes | no defect | flap reopening for CP | no defect | - | |
5 | 7 | right | f | 48 | trauma | yes | 38.1 | occipital rotation flap | parietooccipital | 925 | |
5 | 8 | right | f | - | autologous CP | yes | no defect | flap reopening for CP | no defect | - | |
6 | 9 | right | f | 43 | intracranial tumor | no | 0.8 | temporal rotation flap | parietooccipital | 813 | |
7 | 10 | right | m | 74 | trauma | yes | 19.2 | occipital rotation flap | parietooccipital | dead after 52 | |
8 | 11 | left | f | 27 | hydrocephalus - vp shunt | no | 0.4 | occipital rotation flap | temporal | 1659 | |
9 | 12 | right | m | 39 | trauma | yes | 11.1 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flaps | parietooccipital | 778 | |
10 | 13 | right | f | 56 | ischemic stroke | yes | 3.5 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontal | 951 | |
11 | 14 | right | m | 64 | intracranial tumor | no | 10.2 | occipital rotation flap | temporal | 757 | |
12 | 15 | left | f | 47 | intracranial tumor | no | 1.8 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | occipital | 1435 | |
13 | 16 | right | m | 60 | trauma | no | 3.4 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontal | 640 | |
14 | 17 | right | m | 49 | trauma | yes | 2.7 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | temporal | 504 | |
15 | 18 | right | m | 59 | trauma | yes | 7.6 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontoparietal | 473 | |
16 | 19 | right | m | 67 | intracranial tumor | no | 29.8 | free latissimus dorsi flap | frontotemporal | 459 | |
17 | 20 | left | m | 76 | intracranial tumor | no | 5.1 | occipital rotation flap | frontal | 441 | |
18 | 21 | left | m | 85 | trauma | yes | 26.4 | temporal rotation flap | frontotemporal | 1693 | |
19 | 22 | right | f | 49 | intracranial tumor | no | n/a | SCIP-flap | temporal | dead after 266 | |
19 | 23 | right | f | - | intracranial tumor | no | 5.9 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontotemporal | - | |
19 | 24 | right | f | - | intracranial tumor | no | no defect | direct closure | frontotemporal | - | |
20 | 25 | left | m | 86 | trauma | yes | 9.7 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | parietotemporal | dead after 8 | |
21 | 26 | left | f | 57 | intracranial tumor | no | 6.5 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontal | 61 | |
22 | 27 | left | f | 70 | subarachnoidal hemorrhage | yes | 13.4 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontotemporoparietal | 22 | |
23 | 28 | left | m | 65 | trauma | yes | 18.3 | frontal transposition flap | frontoparietal | 105 | |
24 | 29 | left | m | 65 | trauma | no | 11.3 | skin expansion through galeal scoring and advancement flap | frontal | 36 |
Abbreviations: AVM arteriovenous malformation, CP cranioplasty, EC/IC bypass extracranial to intracranial bypass, n/a not available, SCIP-flap superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, vp shunt ventriculoperitoneal shunt, survival time time between interdisciplinary surgery and of telefone interview or death, „ - “ = same patient as line above
Cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 8 patients (33.3%), followed by depression in 6 patients (25%), leading to suicide attempts with traumatic brain injury in 2 patients (8.3%). A history of extraaxial malignant tumor was noted in 3 patients (12.5%), diabetes mellitus in 2 patients (8.3%), smoking, chronic lung disease and drug abuse were each detectable in 2 patients (8.3%), whereas none of the patients was adipose. 8 patients (34.8%) did not suffer from any apparent comorbidities. For one patient comorbidities were not documented.
Pre-neuroplastic complications resulting in necrosis or wound gaping
17 of 21 patients (81%) who developed necrosis or wound gaping had at least one intra- and postoperative complication during or after the initial neurosurgical procedure. 5 patients (23.8%) had bleeding or rebleeding complications, in 5 patients (23.8%) a CSF-leak occurred after the previous neurosurgical treatment and 6 patients (28.6%) developed a mengingitis or ventriculitis. During their clinical progression, 7 patients (33.3%) experienced the development of a hydrocephalus. Three patients were previously operated in external institutions and therefore no exact data concerning complications was available.
The number of neurosurgical operations prior to interdisciplinary intervention ranged from 1 to 8 and was assessed in all 24 patients. Sixteen patients (66.7%) had undergone 2 or more neurosurgical procedures, and 5 patients (20.8%) had received prior tumor irradiation. Traumaflaps with a question mark shaped incision were found in 12 of the 24 patients (50.0%). In half of the patients, abscesses were identified via preoperative MRI scans or during surgery.
Skin defect type Skin defects appeared as necrosis in 11 of 24 patients (45.8%) and as wound dehiscence in 13 of 24 patients (54.2%). Notably, of the 11 patients with necrosis, 8 patients (72.7%) had a question mark shaped wound. Time intervals between the initial neurosurgical procedure and interdisciplinary surgery were shorter in the necrosis group than in the wound dehiscence group (9–95 days, 51.0 ± 35.7 vs. 13-7319 days, 1649.5 ± 2268.4).
Skin defect sizes ranged from 0.4 cm² to 39.9 cm² (12.6 ± 11.6 cm²). In two patients, no intraoperative photographs were taken, and therefore no defect size could be evaluated.
Surgery The average surgery duration for all patients was 171.30 min (51–424 min, 171.3 ± 99.2). The average intraoperative blood loss for all patients was 158 ml (100–500 ml, 158 ± 126).
In 24 out of 29 (82.8%) interdisciplinary surgeries, skin defects were covered with local skin flaps: 8 occipital rotation flaps (27.6%), 3 temporal rotation flaps (10.3%), 1 frontal transposition flap (3.5%), 11 skin expansions through galeal scoring and advancement flaps (37.9%) and 1 bipedicled flap (3.5%) (see Table 1). 2 skin defects (6.9%) were covered with free flaps: one superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap (defect size could not be determined) and one free latissimus dorsi muscle flap for a 30 cm [6] scalp defect. Both patients had a history of multiple previous intracranial tumor surgeries, radiation therapy and surgeries for wound infections (pat. 16 and pat. 19). In two trauma patients (8.3%), open paranasal sinuses or mastoid air cells were detected on preoperative CT scans and sealed intraoperatively. Fascia lata was harvested in 3 (10.3%) surgeries in order to close dural defects. In 3 cases (10.3%), the skin flap was reopened during an interdisciplinary follow-up surgery. In two cases (patients 4 and 5), bone defects were covered, while in one case (patient 19), an infected bone flap was removed, along with the resection of a recurrent intracranial tumor. For the first surgery of each patient, in 11 out of 24 patients (45.8%) the bone flap had already been removed in a previous surgery, in further 12 out of 24 patients (50%) the bone flap was removed in the neuroplastic procedure. Notably, only in the cases of patients 4 and 5, subsequent surgeries involved the implantation of one autologous and one heterologous bone flap, respectively. This decision was based on the patients’ younger age (32 and 48 years) and favorable neurological recovery.
Germs and antibiotic regimen
In both the necrosis and skin defect patient groups, a wide spectrum of 19 different bacteria was identified, with 13 of these (68.4%) identified as typical skin flora. This included Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus hominis. Notably, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) was exclusively detected in the necrosis group, affecting a significant 27.3% of patients (3 out of 11). The most frequently used antibiotics were cephalosporins, specifically Cefuroxim, Cefazolin, Cefepim, and Ceftriaxon. Additionally, Fosfomycin, from the phosphonic acid group, and Clindamycin, from the lincosamide group, as well as Meropenem, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic, were also utilized.
Hospital and ICU stay durations
The average hospital stay for our patients was 51.73 days (2–266 days, 51.7 ± 67.3) and the average ICU stay was 16.08 days (0–153 days, 16.1 ± 39.6). Patients with gaping lesions experienced considerably shorter hospital stays, averaging 17.93 days (2–55 days, 17.9 ± 14.6) and ICU stays with an average of 0.53 days (0–2 days, 0.5 ± 0.6). In contrast, those with necrosis had substantially longer hospital stays, averaging 97.82 days (2–266 days, 97.8 ± 83.5) and ICU stays averaging 37.27 days (0–153 days, 37.3 ± 55.4).
Outcomes and complications
No early flap related complications like venous thrombosis or arterial insuffiency resulting in flap necrosis were recorded. Nevertheless, 8 out of 24 patients (33.3%) experienced other surgical complications: persisting cranial infection necessitated revision surgeries in 6 of these patients. In 3 patients, the infection was related to allografts: one patient had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (pat. 11) and one patient had a bone flap (pat. 19) left in place during the first interdisciplinary surgery. One patient, with a previous history of bone flap explantation due to wound dehiscence and an epidural abscess, proceeded against our recommendation to delay covering the bone defect for at least 9 months: the bone defect was covered at an external institution only 4 months later. This premature intervention resulted in a new wound healing disorder and a septic condition within three months (pat. 14). One instance of epidural rebleeding occurred subsequent to galeal scoring and advancement flap. Revision surgery was performed without new neurological deficits (pat. 27). Another patient with a psychiatric history (pat. 28) exhibited destructive behavior towards the split skin graft, leading to visible periosteum. Through conservative treatment measures, successful healing was attained.
Ongoing infection, severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and underlying malignancy resulted in a substantial mortality rate of 20.8% (5 out of 24 patients) within nine months following the reconstruction surgeries.
The following patient cases highlight the heterogeneity in causes, comorbidities, and treatments within this patient population (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4):
Treatment algorithm
Based on our observations, and in accordance with principles fundamental to both neurosurgery and plastic surgery, we propose a treatment algorithm that requires further evaluation in larger cohorts (Figure 5). Since wound healing disorders requiring a multidisciplinary approach occur rarely, we invite neurosurgical colleagues to systematically analyse their cases with respect to the proposed strategy.
Discussion
In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies on the causes of wound healing disorders after neurosurgical interventions, especially after decompressive craniectomies and cranioplasties [4, 7, 10, 13–16, 25, 27, 29]. Skin defects may evolve as a result of ongoing chronic infection, skin thinning over implants or necrosis [4, 24, 27]. Their management can be complicated by additional pathologies such as CSF-leaks, hydrocephalus, abscesses or a reduced clinical/neurological condition. Defect sizes up to 4 cm [6] were designated as „small“ by other authors and primary wound closure was reported to be possible [9, 12]. In our series, due to chronic infection, previous radiotherapy or multiple surgeries, even minor skin defects of 0.4 cm [6] had to be closed with skin flaps in order to avoid tension on the wound margins. Whereas some other authors prefer free flaps [23, 28], our first choice were local flaps, as operating time and surgical morbidity is lower. In our experience, underlying sources of infection, especially bone flaps or allografts must be removed. Implants left in place lead to ongoing infection, repetent wound dehiscence and revision surgeries including finally also implant removal. Nevertheless, there are reports of bone - or artificial bone flaps left in place or successful immediate replacement by a new implant [3, 8, 15, 16]. Ideal timing of a subsequent cranioplasty is discussed controversely [13, 22]. According to a high implant associated failure rate in our small cohort of early performed cranioplasty, we advocate that cranioplasties following wound healing deficiencies should ideally be delayed for a minimum of six months, aiming to minimize the risk of recurrent infection.
Conclusions
Our findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive debridement, including bone or synthetic bone flaps, tension-free wound closure, and targeted antibiotic therapy for optimal outcomes. We identify ischemic necrosis and wound dehiscence as critical factors in determining the timing of surgical intervention. Early detection of CSF leaks is crucial for evaluating the urgency and extent of surgery. A tailored, single-stage approach integrating both neurosurgical and plastic surgical techniques proves to be both effective and patient-friendly. In most cases, skin defects can be successfully addressed using local flaps. Given the complex clinical scenarios encountered in this diverse patient cohort, we advocate for a standardized, interdisciplinary approach to achieve the best results.
Author contributions
KA, HS, TR, PR wrote the main manuscript and prepared the figures and tables. MA, WS, MG, AG critically reviewed the data and helped interpretating the data. HW and PH did the statistical analysis. MS is the senior author who supervised all work.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Johannes Kepler University Linz. The study was supported by a research grant from the Medical Society of Upper Austria.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the local ethics committee (EK 1177/2021), conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki 2016 and conducted and reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.
All patients admitted to our hospital give informed consent for the use of clinical data in pseudonymized form.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Anslow P (2004) Cranial bacterial infection. Eur Radiol Supplements 14(3):1–1. 10.1007/s00330-003-2049-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Butenschoen VM, Weitz J, Ritschl LM, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2021) CSF disturbances and other neurosurgical complications after interdisciplinary reconstructions of large combined scalp and skull deficiencies. Neurosurg Rev 44(3):1583–1589. 10.1007/s10143-020-01347-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen B, Li W, Chen D et al (2017) Partial titanium mesh explantation cured post-cranioplasty implant-associated scalp infection. J Clin Neurosci 44:196–202. 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chung J, Lee S, Park JC, Ahn JS, Park W (2020) Scalp thickness as a predictor of wound complications after cerebral revascularization using the superficial temporal artery: a risk factor analysis. Acta Neurochir 162(10):2557–2563. 10.1007/s00701-020-04500-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Denewer A, Khater A, Farouk O et al (2011) Can we put a simplified algorithm for reconstruction of large scalp defects following tumor resection? World J Surg Onc 9(1):129. 10.1186/1477-7819-9-129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Desai SC, Sand JP, Sharon JD, Branham G, Nussenbaum B (2015) Scalp reconstruction: an algorithmic approach and systematic review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17(1):56–66. 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Di Rienzo A, Pangrazi P, Riccio M, Colasanti R, Ghetti I, Iacoangeli M (2016) Skin flap complications after decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: proposal of classification and treatment options. Surg Neurol Int 7(29):737. 10.4103/2152-7806.193724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.dos Santos Rubio E, Bos EM, Dammers R, Koudstaal MJ, Dumans AG (2016) Two-stage cranioplasty: tissue expansion directly over the craniectomy defect prior to cranioplasty. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction 9(4):355–360. 10.1055/s-0035-1549011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ducic Y (2009) Reconstruction of the scalp. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 17(2):177–187. 10.1016/j.fsc.2009.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gerstl JVE, Rendon LF, Burke SM, Doucette J, Mekary RA, Smith TR (2022) Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy—a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir 164(12):3075–3090. 10.1007/s00701-022-05251-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gordon CR, Huang J, Brem H (2018) Neuroplastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 29(1):4–5. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gupta P, Srivastava S (2022) Reconstruction of scalp with local axial flaps. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 2):2265-2272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Iaccarino C, Kolias AG, Roumy LG, Fountas K, Adeleye AO (2020) Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy. Front Neurol 10:1357. 10.3389/fneur.2019.01357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim JS, Park IS, Kim SK et al (2015) Analysis of the risk factors affecting the surgical site infection after cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy. Korean J Neurotrauma 11(2):100. 10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krishnan KG, Müller A, Hong B et al (2012) Complex wound-healing problems in neurosurgical patients: risk factors, grading and treatment strategy. Acta Neurochir 154(3):541–554. 10.1007/s00701-011-1221-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kwiecien GJ, Sinclair N, Coombs DM, Djohan RS, Mihal D, Zins JE (2020) Long-term effect of cranioplasty on overlying scalp atrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg - Global Open. Publish Ahead of Print. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Leedy JE, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ (2005) Reconstruction of acquired scalp defects: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(4):54e–72e. 10.1097/01.prs.0000179188.25019.6c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic A (2006) Scalp reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 94(6):504–508. 10.1002/jso.20487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Okochi M, Komuro Y, Ueda K (2019) Emergency microsurgery for patients with soft tissue, skull, and dura complex defects after trauma: a case report. Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg 6(1):99–104. 10.1080/23320885.2019.1691922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Okochi M, Okochi H, Sakaba T, Ueda K (2019) Soft tissue augmentation using free tissue transfer for Artificial Bone infection or Skull Bone Sequestration after Neurosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg Open 04(01):e1–e8. 10.1055/s-0039-1678702 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schuss P, Vatter H, Marquardt G et al (2012) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 29(6):1090–1095. 10.1089/neu.2011.2176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steiner D, Horch RE, Eyüpoglu I et al (2018) Reconstruction of composite defects of the scalp and neurocranium—a treatment algorithm from local flaps to combined AV loop free flap reconstruction. World J Surg Onc 16(1):217. 10.1186/s12957-018-1517-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Takanari K, Araki Y, Okamoto S et al (2015) Operative wound-related complications after cranial revascularization surgeries. JNS 123(5):1145–1150. 10.3171/2014.12.JNS132602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thavarajah D, Lacy PD, Hussien A, Sugar A (2012) The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection- a case series of 82 patients. Br J Neurosurg 26(1):78–80. 10.3109/02688697.2011.603850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Uzun H, Bitik O, Ersoy US, Bilginer B, Aksu AE (2018) Comparison of musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous free flaps for the reconstruction of the extensive composite scalp and cranium defects. J Craniofac Surg 29(7):1947–1951. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Veldeman M, Daleiden L, Hamou H, Höllig A, Clusmann H (2021) An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy. J Neurosurg 134(4):1262–1270. 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang HT, Erdmann D, Olbrich KC, Friedman AH, Levin LS, Zenn MR (2007) Free flap reconstruction of the scalp and calvaria of major neurosurgical resections in cancer patients: lessons learned closing large, difficult wounds of the dura and skull. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(3):865–872. 10.1097/01.prs.0000240830.19716.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshioka N, Tominaga S (2018) Titanium mesh implant exposure due to pressure gradient fluctuation. World Neurosurg 119:e734–e739. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.