Skip to main content
EuroIntervention logoLink to EuroIntervention
. 2024 Nov 4;20(21):e1330–e1339. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00362

Natural history of a newly developed calcified nodule: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes

Yoichiro Sugizaki 1,2,3,4, Mitsuaki Matsumura 5, YuWei Chen 6,7, Takunori Tsukui 8,9,10, Evan Shlofmitz 11, Susan V Thomas 12, Sarah Malik 13, Ali Dakroub 14, Mandeep Singh 15, Doosup Shin 16, Matthew J Granville 17, Jordan M Busch 18, Eric H Wolff 19, Genie M Miraglia 20, Jeffrey W Moses 21,22,23, Omar K Khalique 24,25, David J Cohen 26,27, Gary S Mintz 28, Richard A Shlofmitz 29, Allen Jeremias 30,31, Ziad A Ali 32,33,34,*, Akiko Maehara 35,36
PMCID: PMC11522861  PMID: 39492700

Abstract

Background

Calcified nodules (CNs) are an increasingly important, high-risk lesion subset.

Aims

We sought to identify the emergence of new CNs and the relation between underlying plaque characteristics and new CN development.

Methods

Patients who had undergone two optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies that imaged the same untreated calcified lesion at baseline and follow-up were included. New CNs were an accumulation of small calcium fragments at follow-up that were not present at baseline. Cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven revascularisation related to OCT-imaged, but untreated, calcified lesions were then evaluated.

Results

Among 372 untreated calcified lesions, with a median of 1.5 (first and third quartiles: 0.7-2.9) years between baseline and follow-up OCTs, new CNs were observed in 7.0% (26/372) of lesions at follow-up. Attenuated calcium representing residual lipid (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-9.98; p=0.03); log10 calcium volume index (length×maximum arc×maximum thickness; OR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.10-6.95; p=0.03); angiographic ∆angle between systole and diastole, per 10˚ (OR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.22; p=0.01); and time since baseline OCT, per year (OR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75; p=0.02) were all associated with new CN development. Clinical events were revascularisation and/or MI and were more frequent in lesions with versus without a new CN (29.3% vs 15.3%; p=0.04).

Conclusions

New CNs developed in untreated, lipid-containing, severely calcified lesions with a larger angiographic hinge motion (between systole and diastole), compared with lesions without CNs, and were associated with worse clinical outcomes.


Calcified nodules (CNs) are an important lesion subset because they are one of the thrombotic causes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and are associated with poor clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)1,2,3,4. From a pathological perspective, CNs are characterised by the luminal protrusion of an accumulation of small calcium deposits formed by fragmentation of sheet calcification. CNs have been classified into two types: (1) CNs with disruption of an overlying fibrous cap with thrombus (eruptive CN) or (2) the presence of an intact fibrous cap without thrombus (non-eruptive nodular calcium)5.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has a high resolution of 10-20 μm and is the only imaging modality to visualise features of an eruptive CN or non-eruptive nodular calcium similar to histopathological findings6,7,8. Previous OCT studies have reported that the prevalence of a CN ranged from 3.1 to 8.0%1,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 and that, compared with lesions without CNs, older patient age and chronic kidney disease (CKD)9,15, especially haemodialysis11, as well as a greater amount of calcium and a greater hinge motion between systole and diastole11 were associated with the presence of a CN. However, these clinical, pathological, and OCT observations were all based on cross-sectional studies.

To date, there are limited data on the natural history of a new CN, the time course of CN development, and the characteristics of lesions leading to a new CN. The principal study objective was to use serial OCT to document new CN development from calcified plaque and to establish the relation between high-risk characteristics of untreated calcified plaque and new CN development.

Methods

Study design and patient population

This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study at St. Francis Hospital (Roslyn, NY, USA) from January 2012 to December 2022. Patients who had undergone two OCT studies that imaged the same untreated calcified lesion in a native coronary artery were included (Supplementary Figure 1). CNs observed at baseline were excluded. In the case of multiple eligible calcified lesions in a single vessel, only the most proximal calcified lesion was included (1 calcified lesion per vessel). The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the institutional review board at St. Francis Hospital approved the protocol. Informed consent for retrospective record review was waived because of minimal risk. For patients without outcome records in the electronic database, a waiver of documentation of consent was approved by the institutional review board; after obtaining informed consent, these subjects were contacted by telephone to confirm subsequent outcomes.

OCT imaging acquisition

Frequency domain OCT (C7-XR, ILUMIEN, or ILUMIEN OPTIS [all Abbott]) was used. OCT was performed at the operator’s discretion, primarily to guide PCI or assess a stenosis. The OCT technique has been previously described17. In brief, the OCT catheter (Dragonfly, Dragonfly Duo, Dragonfly OPTIS, or Dragonfly OpStar [all Abbott]) was advanced distal to the lesion, contrast media was flushed through the guiding catheter at a rate of 3 to 4 mL/s, and the OCT fibre was pulled back automatically at a rate of 18 to 36 mm/s.

Quantitative coronary angiography

Quantitative and qualitative angiographic analyses were performed by experienced analysts (Y.-W. Chen and T. Tsukui), who were blinded to clinical and OCT findings, using QAngio XA (Medis Medical Imaging) and standardised methodology18. Angiographic calcification was classified as moderate (radiopacities noted only with cardiac motion) or severe (radiopacities seen without cardiac motion)19. A radiolucent mass was defined as a radiolucent filling defect in the lumen during contrast injection. The change in the angiographic angle of the lesion (∆angle) was the difference in the angle between systole and diastole using the view showing the maximum ∆angle11,20. Distal left main bifurcation was defined as a left main lesion that extended into the bifurcation including 5 mm segments of either the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and/or left circumflex artery ostium.

OCT definitions and analysis

All OCT images were analysed offline using proprietary OCT software (Offline Review Workstation software, version E.4.1 [Abbott]) as described previously17, and baseline (first) and follow-up (second) OCT images were compared side by side. A consensus of two experienced OCT analysts (Y. Sugizaki and M. Matsumura) was required; a third analyst (A. Maehara) was consulted if the two primary analysts disagreed. Calcium was defined as a signal-poor or heterogeneous region with a sharply delineated border. Calcium with signal attenuation, presumably representing residual lipidic plaque adjacent to or within the calcium, was defined as calcium with a sharply delineated inner border and a partially obscured outer border due to strong signal attenuation7,8,21 excluding gradual signal attenuation due to the limited OCT penetration depth. Untreated calcified lesions without a CN at baseline OCT were identified in a non-stented segment in a native coronary artery (Supplementary Figure 2). A CN was defined as an accumulation of small calcium fragments that protruded into the lumen (Figure 1); each CN was categorised as either an eruptive CN (disruption of the fibrous cap with irregular surface) or non-eruptive nodular calcium (smooth intact fibrous cap)6.

Figure 1. Representative images of new calcified nodule development.

Figure 1

A, A1-3) An OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesion of the left main coronary artery at baseline. B, B1-3) A new non-eruptive calcified nodule in the same lesion at follow-up, 1.1 years later. C) About 2.4 years after baseline OCT, an angiographic radiolucent mass, representing a massive, calcified nodule was seen. White arrowheads indicate lesions of interest. White arrows indicate CNs. CN: calcified nodule; OCT: optical coherence tomography

The maximum calcium arc, the maximum and minimum calcium thicknesses at the maximum calcium arc site, and contiguous calcium length were measured. The calcium volume index was calculated as calcium length×maximum calcium arc×maximum calcium thickness. Lipidic plaque was defined as a region with strong attenuation with an overlying fibrous cap, and a lipid arc >90° was defined as a lipid-rich plaque. Thin-cap fibroatheroma was defined as a lipid-rich plaque with a fibrous cap thickness <65 μm.

Clinical endpoints

The primary clinical outcome was OCT-imaged, but untreated, calcified lesion-related major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven revascularisation since the baseline OCT22. Based on event angiography, events were classified as attributable to OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesions, to other lesions, or were indeterminate. Definite or probable stent thrombosis was also determined. Clinical events after the baseline OCT were confirmed by investigators based on their review of electronic medical records and/or telephone contacts.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables are presented as medians with first and third quartiles and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter- and intraobserver variability for the diagnosis of calcium with attenuation were evaluated with kappa statistics using 40 randomly selected cases. Interobserver variability was assessed by two independent observers (Y. Sugizaki and M. Matsumura), and intraobserver variability was assessed with reanalysis by a single observer four weeks later. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the association between new CN development and clinical or morphological factors on baseline OCT. Covariates included calcium with attenuation, logarithm of calcium volume index, calcified lesion angiographic ∆angle between systole and diastole, and the duration between baseline and follow-up OCT. Covariates were chosen based on their clinical and pathophysiological relevance or univariable relationship to each dependent variable. The cumulative event rates were estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using a log-rank test. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was performed to evaluate the association between new CN development and the primary clinical outcome, adjusting for sex, age, diabetes mellitus, and haemodialysis. Covariates in the adjusted models were chosen based on their clinical relevance and prior reports6,11,23. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and significance was defined as p<0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package R, version 4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Incidence of a calcified nodule

Among a total of 720 patients with baseline and follow-up OCT imaging of the same native vessel, 361 patients were excluded for the following reasons: 259 patients had no calcium in the untreated segment on baseline OCT, 36 patients were lacking OCT imaging for the same calcified lesion either at baseline or at follow-up, 34 patients had an untreated CN lesion at baseline, and 32 patients had insufficient image quality (Supplementary Figure 1). Thus, we identified 372 untreated calcified lesions in 372 vessels (1 calcified lesion per vessel) in 359 patients with baseline and follow-up OCT. The median duration between baseline and follow-up OCT was 1.5 (first and third quartiles [Q1-Q3]: 0.7-2.9) years. Among 259 patients who had no calcium in the untreated segment at baseline OCT, no new CN developed during a median interval of 1.7 (Q1-Q3: 0.9-1.8) years.

Among the 372 calcified lesions, we identified 26 calcified lesions in 26 patients with a new CN seen on the follow-up OCT, whereas there were 346 calcified lesions in 333 patients that did not develop a new CN. The incidence of a new CN was 7.0% (26/372) (Central illustration), and a new CN was most frequent in the distal left main bifurcation (Figure 2). CNs developed more often in lesions with a greater maximum calcium arc seen on baseline OCT: 14.0% (6/43) in >270°, 11.4% (5/44) in 181-270°, 9.3% (14/151) in 91-180°, and 0.7% (1/134) in ≤90° (Supplementary Figure 3A). The incidence of a new CN tended to increase after 2 years beyond baseline OCT, although there were 7 new CNs (5.0%) within the first year (Supplementary Figure 3B).

Central illustration. Natural history of new calcified nodule development and its predictors.

Central illustration

A) The incidence of new CN development was 7.0% (26/372) per lesion with a median duration between the 2 OCTs of 1.5 (Q1-Q3: 0.7-2.9) years. B) In the multivariable logistic model, calcium with attenuation, log10 calcium volume index*, in-lesion ∆angle, and time since baseline OCT were associated with the presence of new CN development. *Calcium volume index=calcium length (mm)×maximum calcium arc (°)×maximum calcium thickness (mm). CN: calcified nodule; d: diastole; OCT: optical coherence tomography; Q: quartile; s: systole

Figure 2. Distribution of calcified nodules.

Figure 2

CN: calcified nodule; LAD: left anterior descending artery; LCx: left circumflex artery; LM: left main coronary artery; RCA: right coronary artery

Baseline clinical, angiographic, and OCT findings

Patients with new CN development were more frequently on haemodialysis than patients without new CN development (Table 1). Patients with new CN development tended to be older and to have a longer duration between baseline and follow-up OCTs than those without new CNs. Lesions that developed a new CN more often had baseline angiographic severe calcification and a greater ∆angle between systole and diastole (10.1° vs 4.9°; p=0.01) than lesions that did not develop a new CN (Table 2, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Table 2).

Table 1. Baseline and follow-up patient characteristics.

New CN at follow-up No new CN at follow-up p-value
(26 patients) (333 patients)
Age, years 73 (59-79) 68 (59-76) 0.07
Male 76.9 (20) 78.4 (261) 1
Diabetes mellitus 42.3 (11) 39.3 (131) 0.97
Hypertension 92.3 (24) 85.6 (285) 0.51
Dyslipidaemia 96.2 (25) 91.6 (305) 0.65
Current smoker 7.7 (2) 8.7 (29) 1
Chronic kidney disease* 34.6 (9) 23.4 (78) 0.26
Haemodialysis 11.5 (3) 2.1 (7) 0.02
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 69.2 (18) 57.1 (190) 0.32
Prior coronary bypass grafting 23.1 (6) 17.7 (59) 0.68
Prior myocardial infarction 34.6 (9) 28.8 (96) 0.69
Medication at discharge from the baseline procedure
Statin 80.8 (21) 87.1 (290) 0.54
Aspirin 92.3 (24) 89.5 (298) 0.9
P2Y12 inhibitor 100 (26) 89.8 (299) 0.17
Anticoagulant 15.4 (4) 8.7 (30) 0.43
Medication at admission to the follow-up procedure
Statin 84.6 (22) 89.2 (297) 0.7
Aspirin 88.5 (23) 85.0 (283) 0.68
P2Y12 inhibitor 42.3 (11) 39.0 (130) 0.75
Anticoagulant 23.1 (6) 12.0 (40) 0.19
Clinical presentation at lesion level 26 lesions 346 lesions
Duration between baseline and follow-up OCT, years 2.6 (1.0-3.2) 1.5 (0.7-2.8) 0.09
Clinical presentation at baseline procedure 0.88
STEMI 0 (0) 0.6 (2)
NSTEMI 3.8 (1) 7.8 (27)
Unstable angina 38.5 (10) 37.9 (131)
Stable coronary artery disease 57.7 (15) 53.8 (186)
Clinical presentation at follow-up procedure 0.22
STEMI 3.8 (1) 1.2 (4)
NSTEMI 15.4 (4) 6.6 (23)
Unstable angina 30.8 (8) 40.2 (139)
Stable coronary artery disease 50.0 (13) 52.0 (180)
Values are median (Q1-Q3) or % (n). *Chronic kidney disease was defined as glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. CN: calcified nodule; NSTEMI: non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; OCT: optical coherence tomography; Q: quartile; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Table 2. Angiographic and OCT findings at baseline OCT.

New CN at follow-up No new CN at follow-up p-value
(26 lesions) (346 lesions)
Angiographic findings
Calcium 73.1 (19) 43.3 (150) 0.001
Moderate 26.9 (7) 25.7 (89)
Severe 46.2 (12) 17.6 (61)
Radiolucent mass 0 (0) 0 (0) NA
∆angle of lesion, ° 10.1 (6.5-13.1) 4.9 (2.0-10.0) 0.01
OCT findings
Minimum lumen area, mm2 5.10 (4.05-7.71) 5.44 (4.04-7.30) 0.92
Calcium length, mm 14.0 (8.5-20.6) 6.9 (3.5-11.3) <0.001
Maximum calcium arc, ° 157 (106-254) 105 (73-166) 0.001
Maximum calcium thickness, mm 0.92 (0.67-1.10) 0.90 (0.69-1.09) 0.93
Minimum calcium thickness, mm 0.37 (0.23-0.46) 0.43 (0.27-0.59) 0.29
Calcium volume index, mm×mm×° 2,127 (764-5,310) 650 (218-1,846) 0.03
Calcium with attenuation 46.2 (12) 11.6 (40) <0.001
Lipidic plaque 38.5 (10) 27.7 (96) 0.35
Thin-cap fibroatheroma 7.7 (2) 5.2 (18) 0.93
Lipid-rich plaque (lipid arc >90°) 11.5 (3) 15.0 (52) 0.84
Maximum lipidic arc, ° 81 (74-115) 94 (81-129) 0.46
Values are median (Q1-Q3) or % (n). CN: calcified nodule; NA: not applicable; OCT: optical coherence tomography

Compared with lesions without new CN development, lesions that developed a new CN had greater baseline OCT calcium (longer calcium length [14.0 mm vs 6.9 mm; p<0.001] and a larger maximum calcium arc [157° vs 105°; p=0.001]), a higher prevalence of calcium with attenuation (46.2% vs 11.6%; p<0.001), and a greater increase in OCT calcium length, maximum calcium arc, and maximum calcium thickness from baseline to follow-up (Supplementary Figure 4).

Among 26 lesions with a new CN, there were 12 (46%) eruptive CNs, and 14 (54%) were classified as non-eruptive nodular calcium. Six eruptive CNs had thrombi, but no non-eruptive nodular calcium had thrombus (50.0% vs 0.0%; p=0.03). Lesions with new non-eruptive nodular calcium tended to have a larger maximum calcium arc on baseline OCT (Supplementary Table 3), compared with those that developed eruptive CNs.

Relation between high-risk characteristics of untreated calcified plaque and new CN development

In the multivariable logistic regression model, calcium with attenuation (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-9.98; p=0.03); log10 calcium volume index (OR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.10-6.95; p=0.03); angiographic ∆angle, per 10˚ (OR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.22; p=0.01); and time since baseline OCT, per year (OR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75; p=0.02) were significantly associated with new CN development (Table 3, Supplementary Table 4). There was excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the diagnosis of calcium with attenuation (κ=0.95 and 0.90, respectively).

Table 3. Factors associated with new calcified nodule development in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
Calcium with attenuation 3.38 (1.15-9.98) 0.03
Log10 calcium volume index* 2.76 (1.10-6.95) 0.03
∆angle of lesion, per 10° 2.30 (1.25-4.22) 0.01
Time since baseline OCT, years 1.36 (1.05-1.75) 0.02
*Calcium volume index=calcium length (mm)×maximum calcium arc (°)×maximum calcium thickness (mm). Covariates were chosen based on clinical and pathophysiological relevance or univariable relationship to each dependent variable (Supplementary Table 4). CI: confidence interval; OCT: optical coherence tomography

Clinical outcomes

Follow-up after baseline OCT was 5.0 (Q1-Q3: 3.3-6.8) years. The cumulative rate of OCT-imaged, but untreated, calcified lesion-related MACE was 16.4% (45 events) (Table 4). There were 45 clinically driven revascularisations, of which 6 were for an MI. There were no cardiac deaths that were clearly associated with an OCT-imaged, but untreated, calcified lesion. There were no episodes of definite or probable stent thrombosis.

Table 4. Clinical outcome after baseline OCT.

Lesions with a new CN Lesions without a new CN p-value
(26 lesions) (346 lesions)
OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesion-related MACE 29.3 (7) 15.3 (38) 0.04
Clinically driven revascularisation 29.3 (7) 15.3 (38) 0.04
Myocardial infarction 8.3 (2) 1.5 (4) 0.02
Indeterminant MACE 14.6 (3) 3.4 (4) 0.001
Cardiac death 14.6 (3) 3.4 (4) 0.001
Data are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimates (number of events). CN: calcified nodule; MACE: major adverse cardiac events; OCT: optical coherence tomography

Out of a total of 372 calcified lesions, the MACE rate for lesions that developed a new CN was higher than for the lesions that did not develop a new CN (29.3% vs 15.3%; p=0.04) (Figure 3). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard models demonstrated that new CN development was associated with untreated calcified lesion-related MACE (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% CI: 1.07-3.85; p=0.04) (Supplementary Table 5). At the follow-up procedure, 38 calcified lesions were revascularised. The MACE rate at the time of the follow-up OCT tended to be higher for lesions with new CN development compared with lesions without new CN development (22.1% vs 13.9%; p=0.18). Out of 334 untreated calcified lesions at follow-up, the subsequent MACE rate beyond the follow-up OCT was also higher for lesions with new CN development compared with lesions without new CN development (9.1% vs 1.7%; p=0.04) (Supplementary Figure 5).

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesion-related MACE after baseline OCT in patients with new CN development versus those without new CN development.

Figure 3

CN: calcified nodule; MACE: major adverse cardiac events; OCT: optical coherence tomography

Among 26 newly developed CNs in 26 patients, 5 CNs were revascularised at the time of the follow-up OCT; and an additional 2 new CNs were revascularised after the follow-up OCT (details are shown in Supplementary Table 6). Eruptive CNs had more events compared with non-eruptive nodular calcium (41.7% [5/12] vs 14.3% [2/14]), and CNs with thrombus had more events compared with CNs without thrombus (83.3% [5/6] vs 10.0% [2/20]), although this was statistically inconclusive.

Discussion

This serial OCT investigation is the first to report the natural history of a new CN - from its development within an untreated calcified lesion to subsequent cardiac events. The major findings were as follows: (1) the incidence of a new CN was 7.0% within a previously untreated calcified lesion; (2) greater amounts of calcium (length, arc, and thickness), calcium with attenuation (indicating calcium with residual lipid), greater hinge motion in the calcified lesion at baseline, and longer follow-up duration were associated with a new CN; and (3) the development of a new CN was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

New calcified nodule development

A CN has been reported by pathologists in 2.5-7.0% of patients with sudden cardiac death24,25. An OCT multicentre registry, including 702 ACS patients treated with OCT-guided PCI, demonstrated a similar prevalence of CNs (4.0%) as an underlying cause of thrombotic events15. Similarly, multiple OCT studies have shown a prevalence of CNs ranging from 3.1-8.0% in ACS patients1,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, and even higher (~30%) when only lesions with a large amount of calcium (>270°) were included11. In the current report, in which we observed a 7.0% incidence of a new CN, half of the patients presented with ACS. Thus, our findings indicated that there were high-risk calcified lesions that developed calcified nodules and that these calcified lesions were not stable.

High-risk untreated calcified plaque associated with new CN development

CNs have been found more frequently in older patients or those with CKD9,15, especially those receiving haemodialysis11. Additionally, Lee et al showed that angiographic hinge motion of the lesion and maximum calcium arc were associated with the presence of a culprit lesion CN11. Although the detailed mechanisms by which haemodialysis affects new CN development are still unclear, a larger amount of coronary calcium in renal dysfunction, especially haemodialysis26, may contribute to developing a new CN. Thus, our findings in the current serial OCT study were consistent with previous cross-sectional OCT studies.

In addition, we found that calcium with attenuation was associated with new CN development. Although the mechanism of CN development has been debated, one possibility suggested by pathologists is that small calcium deposits are formed by the fragmentation of necrotic core calcification (necrotic core adjacent to or within the calcium) within a severely calcified lesion coupled with external mechanical forces due to the cyclic hinge movement of the coronary artery5. Necrotic core calcification seems to be weak against external forces owing to the absence of underlying collagen, whereas flanking calcium sheets with a collagen matrix have greater strength. As a result, CNs tend to arise from necrotic core calcification rather than from collagen-rich calcification. Our findings seemed to support this hypothesis. A near-infrared spectroscopy/OCT study of de novo culprit lesions in patients with acute MI reported that the maximum lipid core burden index in 4 mm (maxLCBI4mm) was largest in OCT-defined plaque rupture (705 [interquartile range {IQR} 545 to 854]), followed by OCT-defined CN (355 [IQR 303 to 478]) and finally OCT-defined plaque erosion (300 [IQR 126 to 357]; p<0.001)27, also supporting the hypothesis that CN lesions have residual lipid components.

Previous ex vivo comparisons of histopathological and OCT findings reported that calcified plaque with strong attenuation had residual lipidic components that were adjacent to or within the calcium and that 45% of superficial dense calcium had an obscure outer border of calcification that contained a residual necrotic core7,8. A new CN develops more frequently in calcium with attenuation, presumably representing necrotic core calcification, rather than in calcium without attenuation. This is supported by a pathological report5.

Clinical implications

Lipid-rich plaques are strongly associated with future cardiac events28, whereas high-density matured calcified lesions are associated with a lower risk of future cardiac events29. In general, rupture-prone lipid-rich plaques evolve into stable calcified plaque30. However, CNs are also associated with future cardiac events in both stented1,2,23 and untreated lesions16. The subanalysis in the CLIMA Study of untreated proximal LADs analysed by OCT reported that the presence of eruptive CNs was associated with future cardiac events16. In the current study, untreated calcified lesions with large amounts of calcium with strong signal attenuation at a hinge motion location evolved into a CN resulting in clinical events. Taken together, there is a subset of high-risk calcified lesions that can develop into a CN; it is important to recognise that these calcified lesions may not be stable.

Limitations

This was a single-centre retrospective study. The duration between index and follow-up OCTs was relatively short, and the occurrence of a CN was low (26 newly developed CNs). Our study did not perform 3-vessel OCT evaluation. The indication of OCT and its timing were per clinical discretion. Not all patients with calcified lesions at the index OCT underwent follow-up OCT. Not all CNs were linked to clinical events, resulting in a small number of events due to lesions with a new CN development. However, the clinical events rate associated with a newly developed CN were not trivial even when compared with known high-risk plaques. The lesion-level event rate from untreated high-risk plaque was 10.4% at 1 year (19 events from 183 OCT-detected thin-cap fibroatheroma [TCFA] of untreated proximal LAD lesions) in CLIMA31; 3.9% at 4 years (20 events from 515 OCT-detected TCFAs) in a single-centre study from China32; 4.4% at a median of 3.4 years (26 events from 596 virtual histology TCFAs) in PROSPECT33; and 3.5% at a median of 3.7 years (30 events from 851 near-infrared spectroscopy-defined lipid-rich plaques) in PROSPECT II28. Furthermore, the interpretation of calcified nodule composition using OCT is supported by limited pathology data.

Conclusions

Untreated lesions with a large amount of calcium and strong OCT signal attenuation with a larger hinge motion movement and longer follow-up were associated with subsequent development of a new CN, and the development of a new CN was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Impact on daily practice

In the natural history of calcified nodules (CNs) in our study, a new CN developed in 7.0% of untreated calcified lesions. Compared with lesions without new CNs, a larger amount of calcium, larger systolic/diastolic in-lesion angiographic hinge motion, longer follow-up duration and calcified lesions with residual lipidic plaque were associated with the formation of new CNs, resulting in future cardiac events. Taken together, there is a subset of high-risk calcified lesions that can develop into a CN, and it is important to recognise that these calcified lesions may not be stable.

Supplementary data

Supplementary Table 1

Additional angiographic and OCT findings at baseline OCT.

Supplementary Table 2

Angiographic and OCT findings at follow-up OCT.

Supplementary Table 3

Clinical characteristics and OCT finding of newly developed CNs at follow-up comparing eruptive CNs versus non-eruptive nodular calcium.

Supplementary Table 4

Univariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with new calcified nodule development.

Supplementary Table 5

Clinical and morphological factors associated with OCT-imaged untreated lesion-related MACE in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models (lesion level).

Supplementary Table 6

Details of seven patients who underwent revascularisation for a newly developed CN.

Supplementary Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Supplementary Figure 2

Schema of an untreated calcified lesion.

Supplementary Figure 3

Incidence of a calcified nodule in relation to the maximum calcium arc and the time since baseline OCT.

Supplementary Figure 4

Comparison and absolute change of OCT findings between baseline and follow-up OCT.

Supplementary Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curves for OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesion-related major adverse cardiac events beyond follow-up OCT in patients with new calcified nodule development versus those without new calcified nodule development.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest statement

Y. Sugizaki - grant for research abroad from Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science; consultant for Boston Scientific. M. Matsumura - consultant for Terumo and Boston Scientific. E. Shlofmitz - consultant for Abbott, ACIST Medical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Philips, Shockwave Medical, and Terumo. J.W. Moses - equity in Orchestra Biomed and Xenter; and consultant for Medtronic. D.J. Cohen - research grant support from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Philips, and CathWorks; and consultant for Medtronic and Abbott. G.S. Mintz - honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott, SpectraWAVE, and Gentuity. A. Jeremias - consultant for Philips, Abbott, ACIST Medical, CathWorks, and Shockwave Medical. Z.A. Ali - institutional grant support for Abbott, Abiomed, ACIST Medical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, CathWorks, Canon, Conavi, HeartFlow, Inari, Medtronic, National Institute of Health, Nipro, Opsens Medical, Medis, Philips, Shockwave Medical, Siemens, SpectraWAVE, and Teleflex; consulting fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, CathWorks, Opsens, Philips, and Shockwave Medical; and equity in Elucid, Lifelink, SpectraWAVE, Shockwave Medical, and VitalConnect. A. Maehara - consultant for Boston Scientific, Philips, and SpectraWAVE; and speaker honoraria from Nipro. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

ACS

acute coronary syndrome

CI

confidence interval

CKD

chronic kidney disease

CN

calcified nodule

MACE

major adverse cardiac events

MI

myocardial infarction

OCT

optical coherence tomography

OR

odds ratio

PCI

percutaneous coronary intervention

Contributor Information

Yoichiro Sugizaki, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Mitsuaki Matsumura, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.

YuWei Chen, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Takunori Tsukui, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Evan Shlofmitz, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Susan V. Thomas, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Sarah Malik, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Ali Dakroub, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Mandeep Singh, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Doosup Shin, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Matthew J. Granville, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Jordan M. Busch, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Eric H. Wolff, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Genie M. Miraglia, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Jeffrey W. Moses, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Omar K. Khalique, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

David J. Cohen, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Gary S. Mintz, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.

Richard A. Shlofmitz, Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Allen Jeremias, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.

Ziad A. Ali, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA; New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA.

Akiko Maehara, Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

References

  1. Kobayashi N, Takano M, Tsurumi M, Shibata Y, Nishigoori S, Uchiyama S, Okazaki H, Shirakabe A, Seino Y, Hata N, Shimizu W. Features and Outcomes of Patients with Calcified Nodules at Culprit Lesions of Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Cardiology. 2018;139:90–100. doi: 10.1159/000481931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sugane H, Kataoka Y, Otsuka F, Nakaoku Y, Nishimura K, Nakano H, Murai K, Honda S, Hosoda H, Matama H, Doi T, Nakashima T, Fujino M, Nakao K, Yoneda S, Tahara Y, Asaumi Y, Noguchi T, Kawai K, Yasuda S. Cardiac outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome attributable to calcified nodule. Atherosclerosis. 2021;318:70–5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nozoe M, Nishioka S, Oi K, Suematsu N, Kubota T. Effects of Patient Background and Treatment Strategy on Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Intervention for Calcified Nodule Lesions. Circ Rep. 2021;3:699–706. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morofuji T, Kuramitsu S, Shinozaki T, Jinnouchi H, Sonoda S, Domei T, Hyodo M, Shirai S, Ando K. Clinical impact of calcified nodule in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:10–9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Torii S, Sato Y, Otsuka F, Kolodgie FD, Jinnouchi H, Sakamoto A, Park J, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, Cornelissen A, Kawakami R, Mori M, Kawai K, Amoa F, Guo L, Kutyna M, Fernandez R, Romero ME, Fowler D, Finn AV, Virmani R. Eruptive Calcified Nodules as a Potential Mechanism of Acute Coronary Thrombosis and Sudden Death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1599–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sato T, Matsumura M, Yamamoto K, Shlofmitz E, Moses JW, Khalique OK, Thomas SV, Tsoulios A, Cohen DJ, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz RA, Jeremias A, Ali ZA, Maehara A. Impact of Eruptive vs Noneruptive Calcified Nodule Morphology on Acute and Long-Term Outcomes After Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:1024–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ijichi T, Nakazawa G, Torii S, Nakano M, Yoshikawa A, Morino Y, Ikari Y. Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification - Ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:242–7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saita T, Fujii K, Hao H, Imanaka T, Shibuya M, Fukunaga M, Miki K, Tamaru H, Horimatsu T, Nishimura M, Sumiyoshi A, Kawakami R, Naito Y, Kajimoto N, Hirota S, Masuyama T. Histopathological validation of optical frequency domain imaging to quantify various types of coronary calcifications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:342–9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jia H, Abtahian F, Aguirre AD, Lee S, Chia S, Lowe H, Kato K, Yonetsu T, Vergallo R, Hu S, Tian J, Lee H, Park SJ, Jang YS, Raffel OC, Mizuno K, Uemura S, Itoh T, Kakuta T, Choi SY, Dauerman HL, Prasad A, Toma C, McNulty I, Zhang S, Yu B, Fuster V, Narula J, Virmani R, Jang IK. In vivo diagnosis of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome by intravascular optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1748–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Higuma T, Soeda T, Abe N, Yamada M, Yokoyama H, Shibutani S, Vergallo R, Minami Y, Ong DS, Lee H, Okumura K, Jang IK. A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Study on Plaque Rupture, Plaque Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Incidence, Morphologic Characteristics, and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1166–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee T, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Zhang W, Cao Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Maehara A. Prevalence, Predictors, and Clinical Presentation of a Calcified Nodule as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:883–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kajander OA, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Jolly SS, Bhindi R, Huhtala H, Niemelä K, Fung A, Vijayaraghavan R, Alexopoulos D, Sheth T. Culprit plaque morphology in STEMI - an optical coherence tomography study: insights from the TOTAL-OCT substudy. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:716–23. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang L, Parodi G, Maehara A, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Vergara R, Carrabba N, Mintz GS, Antoniucci D. Variable underlying morphology of culprit plaques associated with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an optical coherence tomography analysis from the SMART trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1381–9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shibuya J, Kobayashi N, Asai K, Tsurumi M, Shibata Y, Uchiyama S, Okazaki H, Goda H, Tani K, Shirakabe A, Takano M, Shimizu W. Comparison of Coronary Culprit Lesion Morphology Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography and Relation to Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome During Winter -vs- Other Seasons. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:31–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kondo S, Mizukami T, Kobayashi N, Wakabayashi K, Mori H, Yamamoto MH, Sambe T, Yasuhara S, Hibi K, Nanasato M, Sugiyama T, Kakuta T, Kondo T, Mitomo S, Nakamura S, Takano M, Yonetsu T, Ashikaga T, Dohi T, Yamamoto H, Kozuma K, Yamashita J, Yamaguchi J, Ohira H, Mitsumata K, Namiki A, Kimura S, Honye J, Kotoku N, Higuma T, Natsumeda M, Ikari Y, Sekimoto T, Matsumoto H, Suzuki H, Otake H, Sugizaki Y, Isomura N, Ochiai M, Suwa S, Shinke T TACTICS investigators. Diagnosis and Prognostic Value of the Underlying Cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e030412. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Prati F, Gatto L, Fabbiocchi F, Vergallo R, Paoletti G, Ruscica G, Marco V, Romagnoli E, Boi A, Fineschi M, Calligaris G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Ozaki Y, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Clinical outcomes of calcified nodules detected by optical coherence tomography: a sub-analysis of the CLIMA study. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:380–6. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, Bouma B, Bruining N, Cho JM, Chowdhary S, Costa MA, de Silva, Dijkstra J, Di Mario, Dudek D, Falk E, Feldman MD, Fitzgerald P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Gonzalo N, Granada JF, Guagliumi G, Holm NR, Honda Y, Ikeno F, Kawasaki M, Kochman J, Koltowski L, Kubo T, Kume T, Kyono H, Lam CC, Lamouche G, Lee DP, Leon MB, Maehara A, Manfrini O, Mintz GS, Mizuno K, Morel MA, Nadkarni S, Okura H, Otake H, Pietrasik A, Prati F, Räber L, Radu MD, Rieber J, Riga M, Rollins A, Rosenberg M, Sirbu V, Serruys PW, Shimada K, Shinke T, Shite J, Siegel E, Sonoda S, Suter M, Takarada S, Tanaka A, Terashima M, Thim T, Uemura S, Ughi GJ, van Beusekom, van der, van Es, van Soest, Virmani R, Waxman S, Weissman NJ, Weisz G International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT) Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1058–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Andalib A, Almonacid A, Popma J. Qualitative and quantitative coronary angiography. In: Topol E, Teirstein PS. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, 7th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
  19. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Chuang YC, Ditrano CJ, Leon MB. Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease. A statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions. Circulation. 1995;91:1959–65. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ino Y, Toyoda Y, Tanaka A, Ishii S, Kusuyama Y, Kubo T, Takarada S, Kitabata H, Tanimoto T, Mizukoshi M, Imanishi T, Akasaka T. Predictors and prognosis of stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circ J. 2009;73:2036–41. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Amemiya K, Maehara A, Yamamoto MH, Oyama Y, Igawa W, Ono M, Kido T, Ebara S, Okabe T, Yamashita K, Isomura N, Mintz GS, Ochiai M. Chronic stent recoil in severely calcified coronary artery lesions. A serial optical coherence tomography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36:1617–26. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01876-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137:2635–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iwai S, Watanabe M, Okamura A, Kyodo A, Nogi K, Kamon D, Hashimoto Y, Ueda T, Soeda T, Okura H, Saito Y. Prognostic Impact of Calcified Plaque Morphology After Drug Eluting Stent Implantation - An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Circ J. 2021;85:2019–28. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1262–75. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.5.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kono K, Fujii H, Nakai K, Goto S, Shite J, Hirata K, Fukagawa M, Nishi S. Composition and plaque patterns of coronary culprit lesions and clinical characteristics of patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012;82:344–51. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Terada K, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Matsuo Y, Ino Y, Emori H, Higashioka D, Katayama Y, Khalifa AKM, Takahata M, Shimamura K, Shiono Y, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Madder RD, Akasaka T. NIRS-IVUS for Differentiating Coronary Plaque Rupture, Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:1440–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Erlinge D, Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Bøtker HE, Maeng M, Kjøller-Hansen L, Engstrøm T, Matsumura M, Crowley A, Dressler O, Mintz GS, Fröbert O, Persson J, Wiseth R, Larsen AI, Okkels Jensen, Nordrehaug JE, Bleie Ø, Omerovic E, Held C, James SK, Ali ZA, Muller JE, Stone GW PROSPECT II Investigators. Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study. Lancet. 2021;397:985–95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00249-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Ix JH, McClelland RL, Wassel CL, Rifkin DE, Carr JJ, Budoff MJ, Allison MA. Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2014;311:271–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mori H, Torii S, Kutyna M, Sakamoto A, Finn AV, Virmani R. Coronary Artery Calcification and its Progression: What Does it Really Mean? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:127–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna, Burzotta F, Ozaki Y, Marco V, Boi A, Fineschi M, Fabbiocchi F, Taglieri N, Niccoli G, Trani C, Versaci F, Calligaris G, Ruscica G, Di Giorgio, Vergallo R, Albertucci M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:383–91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang S, Fang C, Xu X, Xing L, Sun S, Peng C, Yin Y, Lei F, Wang Y, Li L, Chen Y, Pei X, Jia R, Tang C, Li S, Li S, Yu H, Chen T, Tan J, Liu X, Hou J, Dai J, Yu B. Identification of High-Risk Coronary Lesions by 3-Vessel Optical Coherence Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:1217–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Additional angiographic and OCT findings at baseline OCT.

Supplementary Table 2

Angiographic and OCT findings at follow-up OCT.

Supplementary Table 3

Clinical characteristics and OCT finding of newly developed CNs at follow-up comparing eruptive CNs versus non-eruptive nodular calcium.

Supplementary Table 4

Univariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with new calcified nodule development.

Supplementary Table 5

Clinical and morphological factors associated with OCT-imaged untreated lesion-related MACE in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models (lesion level).

Supplementary Table 6

Details of seven patients who underwent revascularisation for a newly developed CN.

Supplementary Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Supplementary Figure 2

Schema of an untreated calcified lesion.

Supplementary Figure 3

Incidence of a calcified nodule in relation to the maximum calcium arc and the time since baseline OCT.

Supplementary Figure 4

Comparison and absolute change of OCT findings between baseline and follow-up OCT.

Supplementary Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curves for OCT-imaged untreated calcified lesion-related major adverse cardiac events beyond follow-up OCT in patients with new calcified nodule development versus those without new calcified nodule development.


Articles from EuroIntervention are provided here courtesy of Europa Group

RESOURCES